[01:48] <zul> hi
[05:04] <kylem> morning zul.
[05:06] <zul> hi kylem how goes it?
[05:06] <kylem> it goes, it goes.
[05:07] <zul> did you got to linux in the wild?
[05:08] <kylem> no, slept in.
[05:08] <kylem> :)
[05:09] <zul> hehe..
[05:13] <Kamion> zul: otavio asked me to nudge you about grub
[05:16] <zul> Kamion: yeah its on my todo list
[05:16] <zul> xen is a horrible bitch goddess
[05:19] <makx> infinity: jbailey merged initramfs-tools 2 weeks ago, do you wana do a follow-up :)
[05:20] <makx> infinity: add 2.6.18 drivers and small fixes all over the place
[05:20] <makx> infinity: 0.71b is latest
[06:28] <zul> http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/ols_2006_keynote.html
[08:55] <johanbr> Hi. As I mentioned in the channel yesterday, kernel.org kernels do not build in Edgy, due to problems with the stack smashing protection. Against which package should the bug be filed? gcc-4.1 ?
[08:55] <zul> linux-source-2.6.17 but it might not get fixed but it would be nice to reference it
[09:09] <johanbr> Are you sure that's the right package? Since I got the kernel from kernel.org, I don't quite see what linux-source has to do with it. Does the Ubuntu kernel not compile either?
[09:11] <zul> yes it compiles with -fno-stack-prtoector turned off
[09:12] <crimsun> meaning it compiles with -fno-stack-protector, johanbr.
[09:12] <crimsun> johanbr: so filing a bug against linux-source-2.6.17 is valid, and while it may not be fixed, it'll be a reference point as zul mentioned.
[09:14] <johanbr> Okay, will do. I'm trying to compile 2.6.18-rc2 and I have this in the kernel Makefile:  "CFLAGS          += $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-protector-all,  -fno-stack-protector)", but it doesn't seem to help.
[09:16] <crimsun> erm
[09:16] <crimsun> adjust HOSTCFLAGS
[09:16] <crimsun> according to my $COLUMNS, it's line 210
[09:17] <crimsun> also CFLAGS, which is line 359
[09:18] <johanbr> Alright, I'll give that a try and see if it helps. Thanks.
[11:21] <Keybuk> that's a weird one
[11:21] <Keybuk> this kernel didn't appear in menu.lst
[11:29] <cjb> It's a bug.  Thought it was fixed in latest edgy, though.
[11:31] <Keybuk> it could have been fixed since yesterday
[11:38] <Keybuk> me
[11:38] <Keybuk> h
[11:38] <Keybuk> I cannot find a "clean" way of doing this upgrade without causing initramfs-tools to depend on udev
[12:03] <zul> hey
[12:05] <Keybuk> hihi
[12:05] <zul> hey Keybuk how is it going?
[12:07] <Keybuk> well
[12:07] <Keybuk> yourself?
[12:07] <zul> good
[12:08] <crimsun> Keybuk: Is usbfs not mounted by default in Edgy?
[12:08] <Keybuk> crimsun: no, I'm weening everyone off it
[12:08] <Keybuk> use /dev/bus/usb
[12:09] <crimsun> all right, thanks.
[12:09] <Keybuk> I enabled it for the dapper release, but disabled it again immediately after