=== Lure [n=lure@ubuntu/member/lure] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === TheMuso [n=luke@ubuntu/member/themuso] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === dilinger [i=dilinger@mouth.voxel.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === zul [n=chuck@ubuntu/member/zul] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === nigel_1 [n=nigel@nigel.suspend2.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === nigel_1 is now known as nigel_c === johanbr [n=j@jupiter.physics.ubc.ca] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === BenC [n=bcollins@debian/developer/bcollins] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [03:48] BenC: hey how is it going [03:57] not bad [04:03] BenC: Hi - did you see my question about SMP on the -386 kernel? [04:07] mjg59: I beleive the problem is that we build some sketchy legacy ISA drivers into the 386 kernel (and only the 386 kernel) which refuse to compile and/or work on SMP-enabled kernels. [04:07] mjg59: This was proven true for the ltmodem driver in LRM as well, which is why it's only built for -386. [04:07] Oh lordy. [04:08] (It compiles against SPM headers fine, but won't run on SMP kernels, even on a UP machine with smpalternatives) [04:08] It's almost like it was some random binary obtained from Lucent via dubious means [04:08] Almost, yes. But there are drivers in the upstream kernel with similar issues, or so I've been told. [04:09] If that's no longer the case, and ltmodem is the only holdout, I'm happy to just drop it completely again. [04:09] Ok. The result seems to be that we're moving to the -686 kernel on the desktop CDs [04:09] Yes, we moved to -686 when edgy opened. [04:09] Which loses us a small amount of hardware support [04:09] Which makes sense, since you don't want to run the desktop CD or ubiquity on slow machines anyway. [04:09] I did some playing today [04:10] But keeping -386 as the d-i kernel for the alternate CD still makes sense. [04:10] We could easily run ubiquty on a 128MB machine [04:10] Well, assuming parted isn't /too/ pathological [04:14] Based on the hwdb data, about 0.5% of users are on 586 machines with 128MB or over [04:16] Of course, users already in hwdb are less likely to (re)install from scratch with the desktop CD than, say, someone with a new computer, or an enthusiast with fast hardware who nervously reinstalls every month. [04:17] Yeah [04:17] So, statstics of past hardware installed on aren't as useful as one might like. [04:18] In a way it'd be nice to be able to provide an SMP kernel that still ran on 586 machines and default to that [04:18] I'd love to get the desktop CD requirements down, but I also want to see it support SMP and such, so we have to draw a line somewhere. [04:18] But mdz's argument is that there's barely anyone that hits and they could use the alternate CD instead [04:18] Which is pretty understandable [04:18] Ben had discussed a unified -x86 kernel that would rewrite ops on the fly for the detected CPU. [04:18] Not sure where we went with that. [04:18] That would be very cool [04:20] We'd probably still need SMP and UP, because of the sketchy drivers previously-mentioned (unless they are, or will be, fixed), but we could scrap the distinction between -386,686,k7 [04:21] Running the desktop CD without Gnome drops memory usage by about 50MB. Running an Intel graphics system without 3D and in 16 bit drops memory usage by about another 50MB [04:21] Okay, that last data point is somewhat surprising. [04:22] I didn't realise X was that inefficient at higher colour depths. [04:22] it's probably more the lack of 3D [04:22] It's allocating system memory for video RAM [04:23] When you enable 3D, it needs texture memory plus approximately four times the amount used for the framebuffer [04:23] Oh, feh. Right. I don't have any systems without gobs of video RAM. [04:23] I'm spoiled. [04:23] some of us still have the cheap onboard graphics [04:23] The Intel stuff isn't especially cheap [04:23] But still [04:24] On some hardware, we can drop memory requirements for the install by 100MB [04:24] I think that's probably worth doing and providing as an option [04:24] Yeah, a lowmem boot option might be nice. Not quite as "lowmem" as d-i's similarly-named option, mind you. [04:25] just a light wm? [04:25] Don't really need a WM at all, if you're booting straight to X+ubiquity, though it's probably nice to be able to pop up an xterm to see why the world exploded, if it does. [04:25] No WM at all? [04:26] Ah, yes [04:26] I guess so [04:26] Though there's a certain appeal to using ubiquity as a kiosk-type application. [04:27] Which would avoid calling it a "lowmem" option and confusing people, and instead just be a "Boot directly to Installer" option. [04:27] Which, for the clever, would intuitively imply "no extra crap running, so probably less hard on my hardware", and would also indicate "this is what you want if you're doing a bunch of installs in a row and don't need the desktop". [04:28] And then have ubiquity check free memory and suggest it as an idea if resources are low [04:29] It would need an option to the X config to allow it to skip writing the 3D section [04:29] But that's about it [04:29] Pretty straightforward === BenC [n=bcollins@debian/developer/bcollins] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === johanbr [n=j@d154-20-189-105.bchsia.telus.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === johanbr [n=j@d154-20-189-105.bchsia.telus.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === BenC [n=bcollins@debian/developer/bcollins] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === Lure [n=lure@ubuntu/member/lure] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === doko [n=doko@dslb-088-073-074-120.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [12:42] c === TheMuso [n=luke@ubuntu/member/themuso] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === zul [n=chuck@CPE0006258ec6c1-CM000a73655d0e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === Lure [n=lure@ubuntu/member/lure] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === rodarvus [n=rodarvus@ubuntu/member/rodarvus] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === Keybuk [n=scott@quest.netsplit.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === tuxmaniac [n=aanjhan@unaffiliated/tuxmaniac] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === kernel_panic [n=ramattac@44.Red-80-35-101.staticIP.rima-tde.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [03:35] hi everybody [03:35] anybody there? === mjg59 [n=mjg59@cavan.codon.org.uk] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [03:57] I've got a problem with debian sarge and kernel 2.6.17.8 [03:57] kernel_panic: unfortunately for you this is #ubuntu-kernel, and not #debian, which would be a more suitable place for help with debian sarge === jwest- [n=jwest@83.110.124.125] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === fs [i=fs@213.178.77.98] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === kbyrd [n=Miranda@mailout1.vmware.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === rodarvus [n=rodarvus@ubuntu/member/rodarvus] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [07:27] "but it works with Xen's 2.6.16 kernel" [07:27] zul: I hate you [07:29] if there are bad blocks [07:29] nothing can be done about it other than having to reinstall? [07:30] del/create partition doesnt seem to help [07:45] there's something that can be done, but I'm not sure what it is [07:45] gar, this mptscsi is turning into a monster [07:46] jwest-: try the badblocks program [07:53] mjg59: "express installation" === jwest-- [n=jwest@83.110.124.125] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === jwest-- is now known as jwest- [08:00] BenC: damn, I wish people wouldn't hijack other people's bug reports [08:00] that "3 minute hang" one of yours has at least four people with four different problems [08:00] we should just have a single "something went wrong" bug that everyone can gripe in ... it'd make our BTS look so much cleaner [08:01] mdz: Nice name [08:08] hehe [08:08] Keybuk: Yeah, I have like 4 bugs for this "3 minute hang" problem [08:09] Keybuk: Problem I closed 2 of them because the reporters claimed it was fixed with the last dapper upload [08:09] a 3 minute hang is just udev's way of saying "uhhhhhhhh" [08:09] BenC: er, is there no bug contact set for linux-source-2.6.17? [08:09] it does alarm(180) in the child before embarking on any rule processing [08:09] so the fact it hangs for 3 minutes just means the child got deadlocked [08:09] it can be caused by just about anything [08:10] iftabbing two network cards to the same name [08:10] hdparm locking up [08:10] modprobe hanging [08:10] block device errors (if cdrom_id gets run for a duff cd) [08:11] if you get them, ask for /var/log/udev and toss it over to udev [08:11] I can always debug it [08:19] mdz: Should be [08:20] Keybuk: ok [08:24] BenC: I filed bug #55695 and it didn't get copied anywhere except ubuntu-bugs [08:24] BenC: https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.17/ says "No people or teams are subscribed to bugmail for this package." [08:24] BenC: each time we move to a different source package name for the kernel, you need to carry that over [08:25] via the "bugmail settings" link on the +source page === alex_joni [n=juve@dsplabs.cs.upt.ro] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [08:25] hello.. anyone around familiar with customizing a LiveCD for Dapper (mainly replacing the kernel) [08:26] BenC: no wonder you caught up with bug mail; you've probably been missing all of the new bugs ;-) [08:49] hehe === Lure [n=lure@ubuntu/member/lure] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [08:51] BenC: happen to know who's doing the install/live CD for dapper or edgy? [08:51] not spefically, but #ubuntu-devel might be a good place to start [09:03] alex_joni: there are how-tos on the web [09:06] mdz: found some info in the wiki, but nothing about kernel changing [09:06] mdz: I did manage to change the one for Breezy, but for Dapper it's quite different [09:07] alex_joni: with the kernel, it's the same as with any other package, except that you copy the kernel and initrd out of the squashfs into the ISO filesystem [09:07] alex_joni: we would greatly appreciate it if you would update the wiki documentation :-) [09:08] mdz: for breezy I had to tinker with udebs.. this all gone now? [09:09] mdz: here's the info I wrote about breezy http://dsplabs.utt.ro/~juve/blog/index.cgi/01147559232 [09:13] alex_joni: correct, no more messing with udebs [09:13] there's no more debian-installer on the CD, just an initrd which is generated by casper === rodarvus [n=rodarvus@ubuntu/member/rodarvus] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [09:15] or rather, by the usual initramfs-tools process with casper's participation [09:19] mdz: thank you [09:28] infinity: ping [10:31] mdz: isn't 54035 a dupe of 55695 (or vice a versa)? [10:38] bug 54035, bug 55695 [10:38] no ubugtu in this channel? [10:39] guess he left us again [10:39] mdz: they both appear to be bug in idecs [10:40] BenC: yes, you're right; I forgot I'd filed it already [10:40] marked 54035 as a dupe since 55695 has a bit more info [10:40] I still had it on my todo list to file for some reason === jwest- is now known as jwest-- === BenC forewarns everyone of a pending edgy kernel upload tonight [11:14] great, thanks :) [11:23] BenC: would it be possible to apply the following Kconfig aoa patch for -4-, too? http://hg-mirror.alsa-project.org/alsa-kernel?cmd=changeset;node=f72c2a462f761c14c6f8db314afbf1abb4b0a189;style=raw [11:24] (no git id to cherry-pick else I'd have recommended it) [11:31] crimsun: my sound/aoa/codecs/Kconfig doesn't even have the "select I2C_POWERMAC" line [11:31] err, the "select I2C" line [11:32] it shouldn't have either I2C or I2C_POWERMAC prior to the commit === crimsun checks ubuntu-2.6 [11:36] unless I'm missing something utterly obvious, those are the two lines that need to be added, and that matches both current ubuntu-2.6 and alsa-current git [11:37] (well, four lines) === derekS [n=dereks@unaffiliated/dereks] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [11:50] what gcc is 2.6.17-5-k7 compiled with? [11:50] cat /proc/version [11:50] crimsun: ahh :) [11:51] so i guess thats not the problem with my vmware [11:51] thanks === derekS [n=dereks@unaffiliated/dereks] has left #ubuntu-kernel []