[12:42] <BenC> dilinger: probably about two weeks unless some nasty security issue comes up
[12:43] <dilinger> oh, ok
[12:43] <mjg59> BenC: I sent you a couple of patches
[12:43] <mjg59> Did you get those?
[12:43] <mjg59> (Some time last week)
[12:43] <dilinger> guess i'm sticking w/ the git checkout, then; i'm be working for a different company by then
[12:43] <dilinger> thanks
[12:43] <BenC> mjg59: don't show them, but I had issues last week with email
[12:43] <BenC> mjg59: can you resend?
[12:43] <mjg59> BenC: Sure
[12:43] <BenC> thanks
[12:44] <BenC> mjg59: Might be better to send them to kernel-team@
[12:44] <BenC> either way is fine though
[12:44] <mjg59> BenC: Will do in future
[12:44] <mjg59> On their way to you now
[03:37] <zul_> BenC: ping did you do anything special for ipw3945?
[07:42] <BenC> infinity: ping
[07:42] <infinity> BenC: pong
[07:42] <BenC> infinity: I have a lrm 2.6.17.3-1 upload pending
[07:43] <BenC> it contains a crap load of changes for the new kernel flavours plus vmware-player modules
[07:43] <infinity> Oh, we got the clickwrap removed?  Yay.
[07:43] <BenC> there was never a click-wrap on the kernel modules, just the player itself
[07:43] <infinity> Can you put it somewhere, and I'll roll new fglrx crap into it as well, and upload for you?
[07:43] <BenC> kbyrd ok'd the inclusion, and I checked the package, and he was right
[07:44] <infinity> Yeah, no idea why they originally did it seperately, then.  Oh well.
[07:44] <infinity> Did you add their license to the incresingly huge debian/copyright?
[07:44] <BenC> I can give you access while I'm in germany (willing to bet the hotel has better upload b/w than I do)
[07:44] <BenC> not yet, but will
[07:44] <BenC> just got the build working and tested
[07:45] <BenC> I don't plan on doing the next kernel upload till next week, so that's when lrm will get uploaded to
[07:45] <infinity> Oh, then I guess I can do my LRM changes now, then.
[07:45] <infinity> And you'll just have to re-roll your .orig to include them. :P
[07:45] <BenC> no!!
[07:45] <infinity> (Or, trickle that upload at chinstrap now, and I'll just tidy up)
[07:45] <BenC> there's lots more changes than just the orig :P
[07:46] <infinity> Oh, but it matches the new kernel.  Right.
[07:46] <infinity> Feh.
[07:46] <infinity> Stupid renames and such.
[07:46] <BenC> yeah, but it's actually a lot cleaner
[07:46] <infinity> Well, I want the new fglrx to happen soon, so I guess we have no choice but to merge later.
[07:46] <BenC> basically just a new tarball for fglrx?
[07:47] <infinity> Assuming it builds, yes.
[07:47] <BenC> I can merge your changes into mine (easier than merging mine into yours :)
[07:47] <infinity> Yeah.
[07:47] <infinity> My changes will be minimal.
[07:47] <infinity> New tarballs, changelog, maybe a tweak to debian/rules, and maybe a patch or two.
[07:47] <infinity> But nothing big.
[07:48] <BenC> I can incr diff -1 and -2, so no biggy
[07:48] <infinity> Well, .3-1 and .4-1, but yeah. :)
[07:48] <infinity> (Since it's a new .orig both times)
[07:48] <infinity> Whee.
[07:49] <BenC> oh, duh
[07:49] <BenC> so you're still not coming to wiesbaden?
[07:49] <infinity> Yeah.  Just can't do it right now, sadly.
[07:49] <infinity> I'll be at the next conf, with bells on.
[07:49] <infinity> Perhaps literally.
[07:50] <BenC> I'll see if I can find a place that serves "Massive Destruction Weapon's" and drink one for you :)
[07:50] <infinity> I don't even remember what was in it..
[07:50] <infinity> It was like a Long Island with a shot of Kahlua or something.
[07:50] <BenC> probably a good idea not to remember what was in that thing
[07:50] <infinity> Not bad, just not ideal to have 6 in a row.
[07:50] <BenC> especially since I think the bartender started making it up
[07:51] <infinity> I'm seriously never going to live that down, am I?
[07:51] <infinity> shawarma keeps poking fun at me for those things too.
[07:52] <infinity> The dude had almost as many as I did, so I'm don't think he has a leg to stand on.
[07:52] <infinity> s/I'm/I/
[08:33] <lifeless> it does not sound like either of you had legs to stand on:)
[08:33] <BenC> infinity: it was definitely a funny site...wish I had stuck around till you made it into the bathroom and scared the janitor :)
[01:11] <zul> hey
[01:34] <Keybuk> Recent changes to -mm include a reworking of the serial ATA configuration options ("If you blindly run `make oldconfig' you won't have any disks.")
[01:34] <Keybuk> mmmm
[01:49] <infinity> Keybuk: Awesome.
[01:55] <Keybuk> http://lwn.net/Articles/194866/
[01:56] <Keybuk> interesting
[04:27] <zul> hey kbyrd 
[04:28] <kbyrd> hey zul.
[07:32] <mdz> BenC: please remember to update all of the seeds approximately in sync with the kernel renames
[08:06] <BenC> mdz: Can I do that, or does someone else need to?
[08:12] <mdz> BenC: you can do that
[08:12] <BenC> mdz: ok, but I don't know how :)
[08:12] <BenC> is it a package?
[08:13] <mdz> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SeedManagement
[08:14] <BenC> thanks
[09:48] <zul> later..
[09:55] <AnAnt_> BenC: you there ?
[09:56] <BenC> AnAnt: yes
[09:57] <AnAnt_> BenC: ok, I wanted to suggest some things
[09:57] <AnAnt_> BenC: using latest version of ipw2200 instead of the one supplied with the kernel
[09:57] <AnAnt_> BenC: the one supplied is 1.1.1 , while latest is 1.1.3
[09:59] <AnAnt_> BenC: and same for ieee80211 driver
[09:59] <BenC> please file a bug report for that against linux-source-2.6.17
[09:59] <BenC> ieee80211 probably wont be updated
[09:59] <AnAnt_> why's that ?
[09:59] <BenC> too many wireless drivers are dependent on it
[10:00] <AnAnt_> oic
[10:00] <AnAnt_> so ?
[10:00] <BenC> updating it tends to break existing drivers
[10:00] <AnAnt_> oh ok
[10:00] <AnAnt_> BenC: btw, my MMC card reader used to work in dapper
[10:00] <AnAnt_> I tried knot1 and it didn't work
[10:00] <BenC> do you have certain reasons for these suggestions?
[10:00] <BenC> ok, please file a bug about that too
[10:01] <BenC> attach dmesg from dapper and edgy boots
[10:01] <AnAnt_> BenC: well, I needed to run aircrack-ng
[10:01] <BenC> what is that?
[10:01] <mjg59> BenC: We dropped support for TI parts in the sdhci driver and you haven't merged the replacement yet
[10:01] <BenC> mjg59: is that your patch?
[10:02] <mjg59> Yes
[10:02] <AnAnt_> BenC: and I found on the website, that to inject packets, I have to use the latest ieee80211 & ipw2200 driver (and also patch ipw2200 driver )
[10:03] <AnAnt_> aircrack-ng: Wireless WEP/WPA cracking utilities
[10:03] <BenC> AnAnt: what constitutes "latest" for ieee80211?
[10:03] <BenC> because we have a fairly recent version in edgy
[10:03] <AnAnt_> BenC: the one I got is 1.1.14
[10:04] <AnAnt_> the one in edgy is git-1.1.7
[10:04] <BenC> no, the one in edgy is git-1.1.13
[10:04] <BenC> include/net/ieee80211.h:#define IEEE80211_VERSION "git-1.1.13"
[10:05] <AnAnt_> mjg59: you mean TI card readers won't be supported anymore ?
[10:05] <BenC> AnAnt: no, he means we lost the patch that enabled support, it just needs to be reapplied
[10:05] <AnAnt_> BenC: maybe that was after Knot1 ?
[10:05] <AnAnt_> oh ok
[10:05] <BenC> very possible, but if you install Knot1, and then upgrade to latest, you should be good
[10:05] <AnAnt_> so do I still need to file a bug report on that MMC matter ?
[10:06] <mjg59> No
[10:06] <AnAnt_> ok
[10:06] <BenC> mjg59: I don't see a TI patch in sdhci's git history
[10:07] <mjg59> BenC: We shipped one in dapper
[10:07] <AnAnt_> BenC: ok, I'll try using ipw2200-1.1.3 with the ieee80211 that is in edgy
[10:07] <mjg59> It did mad fudging to a bit in pci config space if there was a TI card
[10:07] <BenC> fudge_ti() ? :)
[10:07] <mjg59> But now there's a separate driver for the part instead
[10:08] <BenC> so your patch will add that separate driver, I understand now
[10:08] <BenC> AnAnt: your TI sdhci should be fixed in the next edgy kernel, no need to file a bug
[10:08] <BenC> mjg59: both your patches are for edgy?
[10:09] <AnAnt_> back to the ipw2200, is it possible to add that patch (that enables injection) too ?
[10:09] <BenC> AnAnt: I'll see about updating ipw2200 as well
[10:09] <BenC> depends on how intrusive and ugly it is
[10:10] <mjg59> BenC: Both?
[10:10] <BenC> send it to me, bcollins@ubuntu.com
[10:10] <mjg59> BenC: Oh, everything I've sent is for edgy, yes
[10:10] <BenC> mjg59: I have two patches from you right now
[10:10] <BenC> ok
[10:10] <AnAnt_> what do you mean by "intrusive" ?
[10:14] <BenC> I mean it changes too much
[10:14] <AnAnt_> ok
[10:14] <BenC> plus I need to be sure it isn't opening up any security issues...that sort of patch is tricky
[10:15] <AnAnt_> ok
[10:15] <AnAnt_> where do I file the request ?
[10:15] <BenC> just email me the patch, bcollins@ubuntu.com
[10:16] <BenC> I'll give it a quick review
[10:16] <AnAnt_> ok
[10:22] <AnAnt_> BenC: sent
[10:22] <AnAnt_> thanks  !
[11:57] <crimsun> BenC: thanks for the merges!