[12:41] <Hobbsee> hey all
[12:43] <geser> hello
[12:44] <phanatic> hey Hobbsee
[12:46] <Hobbsee> hey phanatic, geser
[12:55] <geser> what's the best way to ask for an ACK for a sync request?
[01:32] <geser> somerville32: does bug 58493 still exists with dapper-updates for universe?
[01:32] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 58493 in Ubuntu "Broken Package: totem-gstreamer-firefox-plugin" [Untriaged,Confirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/58493
[01:34] <somerville32> Geser: I just got home so I dunno <g>
[01:34] <somerville32> I'll have to take a look
[01:34] <geser> ok, no hurry
[02:58] <neutrinomass> when a package has an icon in /usr/share/foobar/blah/icon.png and we also want the icon in /usr/share/applications, is duplication or a symlink preferred? Is there a specific way the symlink should be created ?
[03:00] <zakame> hi all! :D
[03:00] <zakame> neutrinomass: hmm dh_link? dh_installsomething could do too :D
[03:01] <neutrinomass> ahh, dh_link sounds good :)
[03:04] <sladen> neutrinomass: I don't know of any reason not to do a symlink
[03:06] <neutrinomass> OK. Just double checking, given that I've got close to zero packaging experience ....
[03:07] <neutrinomass> I thought I had heard something about avoiding symlinks, but it was probably in a different context (heh, or I'm imagining things :-) )
[03:08] <zakame> for some stuff, yes; iirc elisp packages for example
[03:13] <sladen> neutrinomass: do it, and see if anyone complains :)
[03:15] <neutrinomass> Ok, although I don't think anybody will object (it's a menu icon for an obscure package nobody even uses ;) )
[03:40] <Cogito_ergo_sum> hi good night
[03:45] <Cogito_ergo_sum> buenas noches... algun mentor que sea de habla hispana?
[03:46] <bddebian> Heya gang
[03:52] <welshbyte> hey bddebian
[03:52] <LaserJock> Cogito_ergo_sum: hablas ingls?
[03:53] <bddebian> Heya welshbyte
[04:47] <linlin> Hello
[04:48] <linlin> I'm wondering if someone would possibly build a program that is complatible for ubuntu and add it to the repos since I cant not appear to get it to work on my own.
[04:48] <linlin> Its for my friend in college, and we would both appreciate it alot if someone could help us out
[04:49] <linlin> The program is IDEFisk, an IAX softphone
[04:49] <linlin> for VoIP
[04:49] <linlin> I think it would make a good addition to the repos as well.
[05:13] <Hobbsee> hey all
[05:13] <imbrandon> heya Hobbsee
[05:13] <Hobbsee> hi imbrandon
[06:47] <welshbyte> cool
[06:48] <welshbyte> i'll be 24 in a few days :)
[06:48] <grexk> lol
[06:51] <Hawkwind> imbrandon: It already turned 15 about 5 - 6 days ago actually
[06:52] <imbrandon> nope the 17th is when he uploaded 0.1
[06:52] <imbrandon> the first time
[06:52] <Hawkwind> Hmmm, the article I read the other day posted by Linus said that on the day I read it was Linux's 15th b-day
[06:53] <Hawkwind> I forget where I read it now, but it was an article by Linus himself
[06:53] <imbrandon> http://www.linux-aktivaattori.fi/projects/15_year_linux_birthday/   <-- finland celebrations
[06:54] <imbrandon> bbiab
[06:54] <Hawkwind> http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2006/08/linux-15th-anniversary.html
[06:54] <Hawkwind> August 25th, 1991 according to that
[06:55] <welshbyte> let's just celebrate for a whole month to make sure :)
[06:56] <Hawkwind> Hah, good idea
[06:57] <imbrandon> ;)
[06:58] <welshbyte> g'night guys
[06:59] <imbrandon> Hawkwind: ahh yea i just looked, thats when he was asking what poeple would have liked to see in it on the newsgroup but he never uploaded it to the public till the 17th of sept
[06:59] <imbrandon> anyhow its all gravy ;)
[08:00] <Kagou> hi
[08:32] <Kagou> raphink: around ?
[08:33] <Sp4rKy> Kagou, so it's right, you upload in REVU now ?
[08:34] <Kagou> Sp4rKy: yes i can do uploads on revu. But for the moment i can't login on revu.tauware.de so i'm searching for an admin :)
[08:35] <Sp4rKy> Kagou, why do you want login on revu ?
[08:35] <Sp4rKy> for upload you just have to be a member on universe contributors
[08:35] <Sp4rKy> only MOTU really have an account on REVU :)
[08:35] <Hobbsee> MOTU isnt the same as universe contributers
[08:36] <Sp4rKy> an i think you're not one of them actually :)
[08:36] <Kagou> Sp4rKy: i can't open some files
[08:36] <Sp4rKy> Kagou, you're an universe contributers, so you just (d)put your files on REVU
[08:36] <Sp4rKy> Kagou, yes
[08:36] <Sp4rKy> Kagou, but you can't run build process
[08:36] <Hobbsee> Kagou: the source.changes?  it's a permissions thing
[08:37] <Kagou> i believe that if i login i can put comments on uploads no ?!
[08:37] <Sp4rKy> Kagou, only motu have an account and can start a build/check process on packages
[08:37] <Fujitsu> Kagou, yes.
[08:37] <Sp4rKy> Kagou, but you can be login _ONLY_ if you're a MOTU
[08:37] <Kagou> Sp4rKy: are you sure ?
[08:37] <Sp4rKy> yes
[08:38] <Kagou> sr et certain ?!
[08:38] <Sp4rKy> Hobbsee, right, i don't see wrong things ? :)
[08:38] <Sp4rKy> Kagou, yes
[08:38] <Kagou> ok :)
[08:38] <Hobbsee> Sp4rKy: define your "MOTU" - are you meaning the people who can upload straight to the archives, or the people in universe contributors?
[08:39] <Sp4rKy> hobsee motu can upload on universe AND check the packages of other universe contributors and then upload to universe if packages seems good
[08:40] <Sp4rKy> and comment packages if not :)
[08:40] <Sp4rKy> Kagou, Hobbsee gloubigoulga, Toadstool are MOTU's
[08:40] <raphink> Sp4rKy: anybody can login to REVU
[08:40] <Sp4rKy> me, mr_pouit, you ... are only universe contributors
[08:40] <Hobbsee> Sp4rKy: actually, anyone can check.  you guys dont get the button to advocate an upload
[08:40] <raphink> as soon as they have uploaded one package
[08:40] <Sp4rKy> really ?
[08:40] <raphink> only MOTUs can login in ssh to the machine though
[08:41] <raphink> if they are given an account
[08:41] <raphink> but login in the web-based REVU system is for all uploaders
[08:41] <Hobbsee> raphink: hehe.  i was wondering, after i read that first line :P
[08:41] <raphink> and yes Kagou, login allows you to comment on your own uploads only
[08:41] <Kagou> raphink: as described on wiki pages
[08:41] <Kagou> raphink: ok
[08:41] <raphink> yes Kagou
[08:41] <Hobbsee> oh does it?
[08:41] <Hobbsee> hmmm okay
[08:41] <raphink> now what's your problem Kagou?
[08:42] <Sp4rKy> oups, i didn't know that
[08:42] <raphink> yes, Hobbsee, unless you are marked as a reviewer
[08:42] <Sp4rKy> but what account need i use for revu so ?
[08:42] <raphink> or, even, an admin
[08:42] <Kagou> raphink: recover password is crashed so i'm searching for an admin to create a password for me ?!
[08:42] <Hobbsee> raphink: ahh...
[08:42] <raphink> what's your email-add?
[08:42] <Sp4rKy> is it the lp account ?
[08:42] <raphink> Sp4rKy: not yet
[08:42] <Kagou> raphink: vetsel.patrice@wanadoo.fr
[08:43] <Sp4rKy> raphink, so how can i create an acount on revu ?
[08:43] <raphink> Sp4rKy: upload a package
[08:44] <Sp4rKy> raphink, i ahve already upload a few packages
[08:44] <raphink> and what's your GPG key Kagou?
[08:44] <raphink> Sp4rKy: then  you already have an account
[08:44] <Sp4rKy> raphink, but what's this account ?
[08:44] <Kagou> raphink: https://launchpad.net/people/vetsel-patrice
[08:44] <luckyone> hey gang
[08:44] <raphink> Sp4rKy: read on wiki.ubuntu.com/REVU
[08:46] <Sp4rKy> i've no text under "Now paste the text below, and enter EOT<return>"
[08:46] <Sp4rKy> :/
[08:46] <Sp4rKy> i have to go
[08:46] <Sp4rKy> i'll check this later
[08:46] <Kagou> Sp4rKy: it's the problem since some days
[08:46] <Sp4rKy> thx all
[08:46] <Sp4rKy> ok
[09:24] <dholbach> good morning
[09:25] <Kagou> hi dholbach
[09:25] <Hobbsee> hey dholbach
[09:26] <dholbach> hey Kagou, hey Hobbsee
[09:27] <Mithrandir> good morning, Daniel
[09:27] <dholbach> hellas Tollef! :-)
[09:29] <ivoks> hi all :)
[09:29] <Hobbsee> hey ivoks
[09:52] <mick_home> well i see tht i have some reading to do from looking at the topic :)
[09:52] <mick_home> i just wanted to know if becoming an ubuntu dev is as insain as becoming a dd
[09:53] <lifeless> mick_home: a core dev - moreso if anything. Less time, more effort - you have to do shit.
[09:53] <lifeless> mick_home: becoming a MOTU is much saner than becoming a DD
[09:53] <mick_home> :)
[09:53] <lifeless> you can read about all this via the wiki
[09:53] <slomo> mick_home: it's harder and a bit annoying... and probably more time-consuming ;)
[09:53] <lifeless> http://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU
[09:53] <mick_home> i'm reading
[09:57] <Boll> What's the most sensible approach for existing DD's to help out with maintaining the ubuntu-incarnations of their packages?
[09:57] <Boll> That info isn't immediately available on the wiki I think.
[10:00] <lucas> Boll: if your package has diverged in ubuntu, the best thing to do is to ping the last developer who touched your package
[10:00] <lucas> if it hasn't, and you just want it to be synced from Debian, just ask here
[10:01] <imbrandon> or if you want to actively maintain both you can also apply for MOTU ( it wouldent be much work if your a DD )
[10:01] <imbrandon> as you know most of the ropes etc
[10:02] <Boll> What I really want is to be notified of bugs/divergences in ubuntu and fix it in Debian uploads.
[10:02] <lifeless> Boll: so we try to run with little-delta againt debian
[10:02] <Boll> If at all possible.
[10:03] <lifeless> Boll: I think you can set yourself as the bug contact on the package in malone
[10:03] <lifeless> Boll: then you'll be notified of all bugs, dunno about uploads - but filing a bug on soyuz is a good way to get that done [eventually] 
[10:03] <imbrandon> Boll: yea set your self as a bug contact and you can put a watch on the dir at patches.u.c
[10:03] <lifeless> (all bugs are sent to ubuntu-bugs automatically. They are additionally copied to the bug-contact for the package in the distro.
[10:04] <Boll> Uhm, where to set myself as the bug contact :)
[10:04] <Mithrandir> Boll: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebianCollaboration is probably a useful starting point.
[10:04] <Tonio__> hello
[10:04] <imbrandon> d-lined ?
[10:04] <Boll> Mithrandir: I will definitely check that out
[10:05] <imbrandon> Boll: and if you notice one MOTU moreso than others uploads your packages more then you might poke them also to politely mail you ;)
[10:06] <imbrandon> that wont work for all packages but some have not "maintainers" but people that regularly upload them
[10:08] <Boll> imbrandon: I cant seem to figure out where to go to set myself as the bug contact
[10:08] <imbrandon> ok give me a package example and i'll walkyou through one
[10:08] <imbrandon> Boll: ^^
[10:09] <Boll> pan
[10:09] <Boll> That would seem to be the one most likely to be useful in ubuntu
[10:09] <imbrandon> ok goto https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/pan
[10:09] <imbrandon> and then see the "bugmail settings" in the very top left
[10:09] <Boll> yup.
[10:09] <imbrandon> click that and add yourself
[10:10] <Boll> doing that.
[10:10] <imbrandon> and also for any other packages/groups you want
[10:10] <imbrandon> then you'll get copies of any bug reports ( with links ) in your email as they come in
[10:11] <Boll> Perfect.
[10:11] <imbrandon> also you can
[10:11] <imbrandon> ....
[10:11] <Boll> yes?
[10:11] <imbrandon> keep an eye on http://patches.ubuntu.com/p/pan/
[10:11] <imbrandon> or use like "websec"
[10:12] <imbrandon> to watch it
[10:12] <imbrandon> thats will have any patches that are applied to that package that arent in debian
[10:12] <imbrandon> s/thats/that
[10:12] <Boll> Ok.
[10:12] <imbrandon> standard pool layout for other packages
[10:13] <Boll> yup.
[10:14] <imbrandon> .oO ( hrm might not be a bad idea to brew up a script that can be run on cron to watch the patches.u.c )
[10:14] <imbrandon> maybe some other time ;)
[10:14] <imbrandon> heh
[10:14] <Boll> How is ubuntu-specific stuff handled. Eg. http://patches.ubuntu.com/p/pan/pan_0.14.2.91-5ubuntu1.patch contains lines like X-Ubuntu-Gettext-Domain
[10:14] <Boll> That probably doesn't belong in a Debian package :)
[10:15] <Boll> So I should do parallel maintainance of ubuntu patches?
[10:16] <imbrandon> you pick and choose what you want to put back in debian , then the next type its time to sync from debian "we" ( said witha grain of salt , e.g. a MOTU ) will compaire and drop our patch and only apply whats nessesary that you havent adopted upstream
[10:16] <imbrandon> some packages will always have deltas , ok take for example ......
[10:17] <imbrandon> i maintain "apt-mirror" in both debian and ubuntu
[10:17] <imbrandon> i do all my changes ( as far as code etc ) to the debian package
[10:17] <imbrandon> upload it to unstable , then
[10:18] <imbrandon> i sync it to ubuntu and apply the one delta that will always be there ( becosue the config is debian / ubuntu spcific )
[10:18] <imbrandon> so best case senerio in that package there is only one delta, but best case overall there are 0
[10:18] <imbrandon> for something like kbfx ( another i watch )
[10:19] <imbrandon> its just streight syncd from unstable
[10:19] <imbrandon> becouse we dont need any changes that upstream / debian hasent taken
[10:19] <imbrandon> that make sense or am i rambling ?
[10:19] <imbrandon> heh
[10:19] <Boll> That makes perfect sense.
[10:20] <imbrandon> ;) brb mt dew run to the fridge
[10:21] <Boll> So, if I want to help out by maintaining/applying any necessary ubuntu-specific patches to the debian edition of the packages I maintain, I go through the MOTU stuff linked in the topic?
[10:22] <imbrandon> well depends on what you mean, ok if i understand you correct your already a DD and have a package in mind say pan ( just to make this easy )
[10:22] <imbrandon> then
[10:22] <imbrandon> the best case would be for you to actively maintain it in debian ( and watch for patches.u.c ) and apply those to the debian package if they apply and arent ubuntu specific
[10:23] <imbrandon> then if you also wish to doso you are more than welcom to apply for MOTU status and get direct upload to
[10:23] <imbrandon> ubuntu and maintain it there also
[10:23] <Fujitsu> And a DD should have no trouble achieving MOTUship :)
[10:23] <Boll> That's exactly what I would like to do.
[10:23] <imbrandon> applying only what is specificly needed for ubuntu
[10:23] <imbrandon> or just syncing from unstable if no changes are needed
[10:24] <imbrandon> well tbh if you are a DD its just learing the "ubuntu way" and that is simple
[10:24] <Boll> I will take a stab at reading the MOTU documentation tonight
[10:24] <imbrandon> then applying to the TB
[10:24] <imbrandon> you shouldent have any problems
[10:25] <Fujitsu> Shouldn't the CC be dealt with first, for membership?
[10:25] <imbrandon> and feel free to ask , if someone is alive in here we'll help out any way we can
[10:25] <Boll> Yeah. Your help, and the overall attitude in here is much appreciated.
[10:25] <imbrandon> true you will probably have to become a member first then a MOTU but its all formaities , you sign the CoC on LP and goto a CC meeting to become a member
[10:26] <sistpoty> hi folks
[10:26] <imbrandon> heya sistpoty
[10:26] <sistpoty> h imbrandon
[10:26] <siretart> moin sistpoty :)
[10:26] <sistpoty> hi siretart
[10:26] <sistpoty> :)
[10:26] <Boll> imbrandon: you might wanna expand those acronyms, given that I am a complete ubuntuy n00b.
[10:26] <Boll> -y
[10:26] <Fujitsu> Boll, Code of Conduct, Launchpad, Community Council.
[10:26] <imbrandon> heh ok CoC Code of Conduct , LP Launchpad
[10:26] <Boll> Thanks :)
[10:26] <imbrandon> CC Community Counctil , TB Tech Board
[10:27] <imbrandon> sounds scary but MOTU is easier IMHO than DD
[10:27] <imbrandon> ;)
[10:27] <siretart> DD Debian Developer
[10:27] <imbrandon> siretart: hehe yea he IS a DD so i figured he knew that one ;)
[10:27] <mick_home> that part he gets ;)
[10:28] <Boll> I will give it a try tonight. For now I should probably get back to hacking on .NET/C#
[10:28] <siretart> becoming a DD takes a lot more time and energy than becoming a MOTU
[10:28] <siretart> oh. :)
[10:28] <imbrandon> ;)
[10:28] <Boll> imbrandon: thanks for your help.
[10:28] <imbrandon> Boll: np , stop in anytime and/or idle ;)
[10:29] <imbrandon> siretart: we were going over what it would take to go from DD ( he is now ) to a MOTU
[10:29] <imbrandon> ;)
[10:30] <siretart> oh. I assume its quite easy, since contributions to debian are credited by the CC for ubuntu membership
[10:30] <imbrandon> yup yup
[10:31] <imbrandon> its realy all just formality stuff and learing the diffrences in the "ubuntu way"
[10:31] <imbrandon> even though there isnt many
[10:31] <siretart> the TB then checks if the candidate is able to teamwork with the other motus, which is verified by some other advocates on irc, usually
[12:00] <sistpoty> cya
[12:04] <heno> Hello
[12:04] <heno> Anyone have time to look at https://launchpad.net/people/onboard/+branch/onboard/main today?
[12:05] <heno> also in REVU at http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=2993
[12:15] <tortoise_> heno: I've corrected those packages on revu but it wont let me upload them.
[12:16] <tortoise_> I need an admin to try and fix it
[12:16] <heno> tortoise_: do you have a login there (I can't even see where to register)
[12:17] <heno> siretart: are you able to help tortoise_ upload his updated package (to REVU)?
[12:17] <tortoise_> heno: Got to ask an admin.  The login just lets you comment on packages though.
[12:18] <Fade> how do I find which patches were made against linux-image-2.6.17.6-powerpc shipped in the current knot2?
[12:18] <siretart> heno: /me looks
[12:18] <tortoise_> siretart: thanks
[12:18] <slomo> fabo: apt-get source linux-source-2.6.17
[12:19] <Fade> slomo -- thx
[12:19] <Fade> incidentally, i think the initrd is bad. vfs can't mount root on reiserfs on my powerbook. :)
[12:20] <siretart> tortoise_: are you having problems uploading it to revu or doesn't your upload show up in revu?
[12:21] <tortoise_> I have two problems. I have upload a package with the same name I get an ftp error. if I bump the version number it doesn't show up.
[12:21] <siretart> ah. I see
[12:21] <siretart> syncing keyring now and trying to manually process lost uploads
[12:35] <tortoise_> siretart: any joy?
[12:44] <siretart> tortoise_: hang on, still processing
[12:45] <ajmitch> siretart: what's the current issue with the lostpw.py? just things in the wrong place?
[12:45] <Mithrandir> ajmitch: have you forgotten to push stuff to the networkauth repo?
[12:46] <ajmitch> Mithrandir: things are at revno 86 there, right?
[12:46] <siretart> ajmitch: some scripts seem to have gotten lost during the svn->bzr conversion
[12:46] <siretart> ajmitch: I'm currently moving, so my time is quite limited
[12:47] <ajmitch> ok
[12:47] <Mithrandir> ajmitch: I don't remember, I just remember the last commit being end of july or thereabouts.
[12:48] <ajmitch> fixed most of the bugs that showed up since then, which have stopped me from uploading - there have been a couple of delays along the way
[12:48] <ajmitch> not nearly as good as I'd hoped it to be, but I'll keep at it
[12:53] <siretart> tortoise_: ok, queue cleared, feel free to reupload
[12:53] <tortoise_> siretart: thanks
[01:07] <geser> could a motu please review the fix for bug 58564?
[01:07] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 58564 in php4-yaz "php4-yaz won't install (broken dependency)" [Untriaged,Unconfirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/58564
[01:07] <geser> I try to get it included in dapper-updates
[01:20] <tortoise_> siretart: No luck still not working :(
[01:25] <tortoise_> uploads fine but revu doesn't show the change
[01:26] <siretart> tortoise_: what package did you upload?
[01:26] <siretart> don't tell me virkey
[01:26] <siretart> virtkey
[01:26] <tortoise_> yep
[01:27] <siretart> virtkey_0.41_i386.changes
[01:27] <tortoise_> yep
[01:27] <siretart> don't upload binaries, as we cannot review them
[01:27] <tortoise_> Uploading via ftp virtkey_0.41.dsc: done.
[01:27] <tortoise_> Uploading via ftp virtkey_0.41.orig.tar.gz: done.
[01:27] <tortoise_> Uploading via ftp virtkey_0.41.diff.gz: done.
[01:27] <siretart> the processor only reacts to *_source.changes files. there is no point in uploading anything else as it keeps blocking further uploads
[01:28] <ajmitch> that reminds me that I have to write that queue cleaner
[01:28] <siretart> tortoise_: you did that on a _i386.changes file. don't do that. use '-S -sa' on debuild/dpkg-buildpackage
[01:28] <siretart> ajmitch: just do it in a local branch, we can merge it in the production branch
[01:28] <tortoise_> oh ok, I was just using -sa.  apologies
[01:29] <siretart> no problem
[01:29] <siretart> it happens from time to time
[01:31] <tortoise_> siretart: Is it ready for me to try again or will that screw things further?
[01:32] <siretart> tortoise_: I cleaned, feel free to upload
[01:39] <ajmitch> siretart: ignore the f-spot binary upload, I'm just testing out a script :)
[01:39] <siretart> ajmitch: no problem :)
[01:53] <lucas> ajmitch: note that your cdbs upload is not compliant with the new "log entries for merged packages" I've been pushing
[01:56] <slomo> lucas: is my avahi and mono upload from yesterday fine? ;)
[01:57] <lucas> didn't read it, sorry :)
[01:58] <tortoise_> Could anyone take a peak at my packages onboard and virtkey?
[02:02] <ajmitch> lucas: gee thanks
[02:03] <grandmax> bonjour
[02:04] <grandmax> j'ai un problme, quelqu'un saurait m'aider ? je ne sais pas quoi faire d'un fichier bin pour installer un jeu sur ubuntu ( planeshift )
[02:05] <lucas> grandmax: use #ubuntu (english) or #ubuntu-fr (french) for this
[02:05] <grandmax> oops sorry
[02:06] <grandmax> so i go on french one :)
[02:43] <Hobbsee> hey all
[02:44] <ajmitch> hello Hobbsee
[02:44] <zul> hey crazy person
[02:44] <Hobbsee> hehe
[02:45] <zul> heh
[03:05] <geser> what's the best way to ask for an ACK for a sync request?
[03:05] <geser> ask here? do something else?
[03:30] <Hobbsee> geser: ask here, or subscribe ubuntu-universe-sponsors
[03:35] <geser> I've subscribed ubuntu-universe-sponsors to the both sync requests waiting for an ACK
[03:35] <geser> could a motu please review the fix for bug 58564 to get it included in dapper-updates?
[03:35] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 58564 in php4-yaz "php4-yaz won't install (broken dependency)" [Untriaged,Unconfirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/58564
[03:36] <Hobbsee> geser: you'll have to talk to the archive admins for that
[03:36] <geser> I asked in #ubuntu-devel an pitti created an dapper task for it
[03:37] <geser> and told me I should look here for a review
[03:40] <Hobbsee> ah
[03:46] <Hobbsee> geser: i just ack'd the other two listed as unconfirmed, subscribed to ubuntu-universe-sponsors.  i wouldnt be confident to confirm the yaz one though, not knowing enough
[03:46] <Hobbsee> hey ogra
[03:46] <ogra> hey Hobbsee
[03:48] <Hobbsee> ogra: likes reviewing things though :P
[03:48] <ogra> suure
[03:48] <ogra> heh
[03:48] <ogra> after feature freeze :P
[03:49] <Hobbsee> ogra: :P
[03:50] <Hobbsee> ogra: how are the features going?
[03:50] <Hobbsee> yay.  nothing listed as requiring sponsoring on that list now.
[03:51] <ogra> *ltsp
[03:52] <ogra> i heard you lost a national hero today :/
[03:52] <kelmo> to a sting ray no less . . .
[03:53] <kelmo> that guy was awesome
[03:53] <Hobbsee> ogra: indeed.
[03:54] <geser> Hobbsee: thanks for the ACKs
[03:54] <geser> Hobbsee: have you a suggestion who should I ask about the review for php4-yaz?
[03:54] <Hobbsee> geser: not a problem
[03:55] <Hobbsee> geser: not really.  someone around here should do it
[04:12] <crimsun> geser: for dapper-updates?
[04:18] <geser> yes, for dapper-updates
[04:18] <geser> dapper and edgy had the same problem
[04:18] <geser> for edgy you already sponsored a package
[04:19] <crimsun> if you have a debdiff, e-mail mdz about it
[04:20] <geser> a debdiff is already attached to the bug
[08:51] <seaLne> any revu admin feel like comenting on http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=3028 to say k3b 0.12.17 is already in the archive, and archiving k3b on revu?
[08:57] <tortoise_> Could anyone take a peak at my packages onboard and virtkey?
[09:16] <dholbach> good night
[09:16] <dholbach> tortoise_: I did and sent you a mail.
[09:16] <dholbach> tortoise_: (you and henrik)
[09:16] <ryanakca> why am I getting these errors http://pastebin.ca/160826 ?
[09:16] <ryanakca> hey dholbach
[09:16] <tortoise_> thanks dholbach
[09:17] <tortoise_> mail hasnt come through yet
[09:17] <dholbach> tortoise_: (I suppose you're Chris Jones, aren't you)?
[09:17] <tortoise_> dholbach: yes
[09:17] <dholbach> I sent to the address in debian/changelog
[09:18] <dholbach> have a nice evening - see you tomorrow
[09:23] <ivoks> http://www.tortall.net/mu/wiki/Cankiri - someone should package this for revu, if interested
[09:31] <phanatic> good evening
[09:51] <ryanakca> why am I getting these errors http://pastebin.ca/160826 when running cdbs-edit-patch 01-no-ferny-klogo.patch  ?
[10:37] <welshbyte> good evening
[10:40] <phanatic> evening welshbyte
[10:40] <welshbyte> ello phanatic
[11:46] <Whoopie> LaserJock: did you hear anything related to the dapper-backports issue we discussed some days ago?
[11:48] <LaserJock> no
[11:48] <|-|ank> yes?
[11:51] <ryanakca> why am I getting these errors http://pastebin.ca/160826 when running cdbs-edit-patch 01-no-ferny-klogo.patch  ?