[12:14] <yogurtthewise> hi there
[12:15] <yogurtthewise> I just managed to create a package for moc 2.4 for ubuntu, compiles perfectly and package builds with no prob. what should I do to see it included?
[12:15] <yogurtthewise> there's an unofficial deb pkg I started with, it's very easy, but it diverges from debian repos, so dunno if it can actually be accepted by ubuntu
[12:15] <yogurtthewise> there are lots of important improvements over the available 2.3, that's why I'm mentioning it
[12:16] <Nafallo> it can, but what is the problem with the current debian packaging then?
[12:16] <yogurtthewise> I'm not a bleeding edge fan or something
[12:16] <Nafallo> where few packages diverge from debian that way see... those who does have good reasons
[12:17] <yogurtthewise> I'm actually wrong, sorry
[12:17] <yogurtthewise> 2.4.x is available in unstable
[12:17] <sistpoty> yogurtthewise: and is in edgy as well ;)
[12:18] <yogurtthewise> ewhehe, noticed it too late... it wasnt available in dapper so I thought it wasnt in debian either, sorry
[12:18] <yogurtthewise> it's been a nice exercise to port the one I found, tho :)
[12:19] <yogurtthewise> so I guess the question is rather: why isnt dapper shipping 2.4.0?
[12:19] <yogurtthewise>  *** 2.3.3-1 0
[12:19] <yogurtthewise>         500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com dapper/universe Package
[12:19] <yogurtthewise> that's apt-cache policy moc
[12:19] <ajmitch> because dapper's upstream version freeze was some time in january
[12:20] <Nafallo> we are working on edgy now. dapper is frozen since june.
[12:20] <yogurtthewise> I see, thanks
[12:20] <ajmitch> so nothing would have been automatically synced since at least then :)
[12:20] <Nafallo> ehrm, totally frozen, gone stable etc... :-)
[12:20] <ajmitch> Nafallo: yes, but the freeze was even earlier :)
[12:20] <ajmitch> people often ask why the latest & shiniest didn't make it into dapper :)
[12:21] <Nafallo> ajmitch: yea, but that wasn't TOTALLY frozen ;-)
[12:21] <ajmitch> just slushy
[12:21] <ajmitch> anyway, brb
[12:26] <huats_> I am trying to creaete a .deb I have a file debian/pyversion that contains 2.4- and during the sudo pbuilder build ../*.dsc it keeps searching for python2.5
[12:26] <huats_> does anybody know what can I do ?
[01:32] <imbrandon> ajmitch, you got a sec ?
[01:34] <ajmitch> imbrandon: not really, what's up?
[01:35] <imbrandon> why cant this be removed , or is there a was to force it ?http://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/23385
[01:36] <ajmitch> imbrandon: there's a bug open on it, look that up
[01:36] <ajmitch> ok, bug isn't open..
[01:36] <ajmitch> bug 42847
[01:36] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 42847 in mldonkey "mldonkey-server fails to uninstall" [Medium,Fix released]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/42847
[01:37] <ajmitch> or related closed bugs
[01:37] <imbrandon> kk
[01:41] <Nafallo> :-(
[01:41] <Nafallo> s/\(/\)/
[02:06] <bddebian> Heya gang
[02:07] <superm1> heya bddebian, thanks for the Revu.  appreciate it
[02:07] <bddebian> Heh, hello Nafallo
[02:07] <bddebian> superm1: NP
[02:07] <Nafallo> :-)
[02:13] <sistpoty> hey bddebian
[02:43] <CarlFK> http://packages.ubuntu.com/edgy/graphics/gocr
[02:43] <CarlFK> I just built a .deb from the .41 source - who should I tell that it works ?
[03:05] <zul> hey Hobbsee
[03:05] <Hobbsee> hey zul
[03:07] <ajmitch> Hobbsee!
[03:07] <Hobbsee> ajmitch!
[03:07] <ajmitch> hi
[03:09] <TheMuso> Hey Hobbsee, ajmitch.
[03:09] <ajmitch> hello TheMuso
[03:10] <Hobbsee> hey TheMuso
[03:30] <bddebian> Belated hello sistpoty
[03:30] <bddebian> Gah
[03:31] <bddebian> Heya Hobbsee, ajmitch
[03:31] <Hobbsee> hey bddebian
[03:33] <ajmitch> hi
[04:03] <jamadagni> hello anyone here?
[04:04] <jamadagni> can i ask for help on local repos here?
[07:15] <ispiked> where can I report a bug about a package dependency issue?
[07:16] <imbrandon> launchpad.net
[07:16] <ispiked> hrmph...
[07:17] <imbrandon> whats the problem ?
[07:17] <imbrandon> err what package
[07:18] <ispiked> well, it's weird. it's libgnomevfs2-0.
[07:18] <ispiked> on packages.ubuntu.com it's showing that 2.14.1-0ubuntu8 is the latest version, but in synaptic it's showing ubuntu1 for me.
[07:18] <ispiked> (trying to install the -dbg package so I can get symbols...)
[07:19] <ispiked> and when I install the -dbg package I get "libgnomevfs2-0 (=2.14.1-0ubuntu8) but 2.14.2-0ubuntu1 is to be installed
[07:20] <ajmitch> make sure you have dapper-updates/dapper-security enabled for all components (universe included)
[07:21] <ajmitch> though it appears to be in main
[07:30] <imbrandon> ispiked, that get you fixed up ?
[07:30] <ispiked> imbrandon: maybe...
[07:30] <imbrandon> k
[07:30] <imbrandon> just checkin
[07:30] <imbrandon> ;)
[07:32] <ispiked> now it's showing version 2.14.2-0... instead of 2.14.1-0...
[07:32] <ispiked> and that's not even listed on packages.ubuntu.com... :S
[07:33] <seth> packages is out of date often
[07:33] <ispiked> good to know!
[07:33] <lifeless> use launchpad, its always up to date
[07:33] <seth> yep
[07:34] <ispiked> I hate launchpad's UI...
[07:34] <ispiked> how would I do that starting from launchpad.com?
[07:34] <ispiked> err.. .net
[07:35] <ispiked> https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu ?
[07:35] <imbrandon> https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+search?text=libgnomevfs2-0
[07:35] <lifeless> https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+search?text=libgnomevfs2
[07:36] <lifeless> first hit
[07:36] <imbrandon> notice .2-0 is in the updates pocket
[07:36] <lifeless> https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/gnome-vfs2
[07:36] <imbrandon> ;)
[07:36] <ispiked> cool.
[07:37] <imbrandon> idk if p.u.c does -updates
[07:37] <StevenK> imbrandon: I doubt it
[07:37] <imbrandon> heya StevenK
[07:38] <imbrandon> hehe
[07:39] <imbrandon> ok whom can i get to eyeball a package for me on revu so i dont upload a broken^stupid mistake on my first go at a lib pkg
[07:40] <StevenK> imbrandon: Shoot yourself in the foot now, it saves time.
[07:40] <imbrandon> http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=3109  ajmitch ran revu-tools on it so it should be easy ;)
[07:40] <imbrandon> StevenK, hahaha
[07:45] <welshbyte> good morning
[07:45] <imbrandon> moins welshbyte
[07:46] <welshbyte> ello imbrandon
[07:57] <Kagou> good morning
[08:03] <Kagou> hey raphink
[08:05] <raphink> yop Kagou
[08:36] <superm1> hey are any MOTU's around that could do a REVU?
[08:45] <dholbach> good morning
[08:46] <Fujitsu> Morning.
[08:48] <dholbach> hi Fujitsu
[10:29] <xerxas_> Hi
[10:30] <Fujitsu> Hi.
[10:39] <jamadagni> hello anyone here?
[10:42] <Fujitsu> No.
[10:42] <jamadagni> haha
[10:42] <jamadagni> ok i have a q
[10:42] <Fujitsu> Fire away.
[10:42] <jamadagni> if the same package is found in two repositories, one signed and the other unsigned,
[10:43] <jamadagni> then apt-get will it take the signed packages?
[10:43] <jamadagni> or the unsigned/
[10:43] <Fujitsu> It will take whatever is newer, then whatever appears first in sources.list.
[10:46] <jamadagni> if that's so, then kdegames_4%3a3.5.2-0ubuntu3_all.deb is newer than kdegames_3.5.2-0ubuntu3_all.deb, right/
[10:47] <Fujitsu> Hm... I know little about package `epochs', as I believe the colon represents.
[10:49] <Fujitsu> I think it should be newer, yes.
[10:55] <jamadagni> ok leave that.
[10:57] <jamadagni> i have a local repo with tidy and libtidy. these are also present on the remote repos
[10:58] <jamadagni> and the local repo is configured before the remote repo in sources.list
[10:58] <jamadagni> but still apt-get goes and gets the remote file
[10:58] <jamadagni> why?
[11:00] <jamadagni> i remove the remote repo from the list
[11:00] <jamadagni> and then i try to isntall,
[11:00] <jamadagni> then it installs the file from the local repo
[11:04] <Fujitsu> Are the versions in the local repository newer?
[11:04] <jamadagni> same version
[11:05] <Fujitsu> Hm.
[11:24] <xerxas__> in edgy , python package should use 2.4 , right ?
[11:27] <Adri2000> hub: are you here ?
[12:29] <z\> hello
[12:41] <xopher> ,
[01:25] <beligum> Hello everybody, got another question \o/
[01:26] <beligum> What do I do to change a package name? I mean, what files should I edit? (just debian subdir, or anything else?)
[01:50] <phanatic> good afternoon
[02:57] <raphink> yop ledroide
[02:57] <ledroide> yop raphink
[03:09] <seth|away> beligum, debian/control needs changed (re: your earlier question)
[03:09] <beligum> thx, got that
[03:09] <beligum> apparently, changelog too
[03:10] <beligum> that's where the problem resided
[03:10] <seth|away> yeah, if you'd already added the changelog entry
[03:11] <beligum> seth, you an experienced packager?
[03:11] <beligum> Can you take a look at http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=3117 ?
[03:12] <beligum> This is my third revision, it's driving me crazy, never thought packaging would be so hard ...
[03:56] <reggaemanu_> hi
[03:57] <reggaemanu_> i'ml new to the universe contributors world, where i have to upload packages? is it on upload.ubuntu.com like described on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Uploads ?
[03:59] <zul> !revu
[03:59] <ubotu> REVU is a web-based tool to give people who have worked on Ubuntu packages a chance to "put their packages out there" for other people to look at and comment on in a structured manner. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Packages/REVU
[04:01] <reggaemanu_> ok, so on revu.tauware.de, thanks zul, i've read a lots of wepage about revu on the wiki but not that one
[04:16] <AnAnt> any MOTU here ?
[04:17] <AnAnt> or admin, I dunno
[04:24] <Adri2000> can someone help me to fix a diff.gz problem : "-please avoid having config.guess and config.sub in the diff." (http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=3071) ? what's the best way to fix that ?
[04:27] <sladen> Adri2000: at the top of each patch can you say what/why that patch is doing
[04:27] <sladen> Adri2000: and in the changelog from   Initial Release with
[04:27] <sladen>  + MP3 constructor naming fix (doesn't compile without)
[04:28] <sladen>  + BitmapSlider fix, control has XXX YYY bug otherwise
[04:28] <sladen>  + Also fix Bitmap Button class to solve ZZZ issue
[04:28] <geser> Adri2000: you could move the shiped files out of the way, copy those from autotools-dev and undo it when you are finished
[04:29] <Adri2000> sladen: ok
[04:30] <sladen>  + Fix libqt include directory
[04:31] <Adri2000> geser: look at the debian/rules, there are a few lines added by dh_make which copy these files config.{sub,guess}
[04:35] <geser> Adri2000: as you copy the new config.{sub,guess} you are changing them (from the view of diff) -> they are included in your diff.gz
[04:36] <geser> if you do a more intelligent approach and backup the original files and restore them afterwards they aren't changed anymore when diffing
[04:37] <volker> hi
[04:40] <Adri2000> geser: seems that i don't have the original files, because debuild already copied the new ones
[04:41] <VolkA> i have a question regarding merging of debian packages: yesterday a nice guy from this channel looked into merging the zeroc-ice package on my request and filed a merge request. could someone give me an estimate how long this will take to get into the distribution? (day, week?)
[04:41] <geser> !info zeroc-ice edgy
[04:41] <ubotu> zeroc-ice: Metapackage to install all Ice related packages. In component universe, is optional. Version 3.0.1-4 (edgy), package size 27 kB, installed size 64 kB
[04:42] <VolkA> cool bot :-)
[04:42] <geser> zeroc-ice 3.1.0 got uploaded but is sitting currently in the NEW queue
[04:44] <VolkA> ok, so i guess i can upgrade to get it in a matter of hours?
[04:45] <geser> unlikely
[04:45] <geser> they must be checked because they introduced a new binary package
[04:46] <geser> it can take several days till an archive admin reviews them
[04:46] <VolkA> ok, thanks for the info!
[04:47] <Nafallo> geser: it's friday tomorrow ;-)
[04:48] <geser> ok than it may be a matter of hours :)
[04:49] <VolkA> can i download the new binary packages from the new queue somewhere?
[04:49] <Mithrandir> VolkA: no
[04:50] <beligum> Can I seduce someone to take a look at my libinstrudeo package: http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=3119
[04:51] <VolkA> hm, thats bad ... i need to have a server with this new release up and running till tomorrow ... ok, then i think i'll have fun compiling it myself :-)
[04:55] <Nafallo> VolkA: either that or talk nicely to the archive admins :-)
[05:03] <bddebian> Heya gang
[05:20] <Lutin> Hi
[05:21] <Lutin> is to possible to create two different packages libfoo and libfoo-dbg (with debug symbols) using cdbs ?
[05:21] <azeem> Lutin: that is standard practise, many library packages do that
[05:23] <Lutin> azeem, and how can I do that ?
[05:23] <azeem> have a look at some existing library packages done with CDBS
[05:24] <Lutin> azeem, eg ?
[05:25] <azeem> I don't know off hand
[05:25] <Lutin> oh :(
[05:25] <azeem> Lutin: just check some library's package Build-Depends for cdbs and see whether they build a debug package
[05:25] <azeem> you should hit one soon enough
[05:27] <Lutin> azeem, ok , gonna try it
[05:28] <azeem> Lutin: the GNOME libraries are mostly done with CDBS, except for the low-level ones (gtk+, glib, atk)
[05:40] <VolkA> cu, and thanks for the help
[06:27] <[GuS] > Hi people!
[06:27] <[GuS] > some could point me a link to see how to make binary - dev and docs package from source?
[06:32] <bddebian> http://help.ubuntu.com  and look at the Packaging Guide
[06:32] <[GuS] > yeah i know that one...
[06:33] <bddebian> OK, what else do you need?
[06:33] <bddebian> Have you looked at the Debian New Maintainers Guide?
[06:34] <[GuS] > i need to know wich is necesary to make -dev and -doc packages... besides binary one...
[06:35] <Gloubiboulga> .install files :)
[06:35] <bddebian> Aye :-)
[06:35] <[GuS] > ?
[06:36] <bddebian> [GuS] : Make your package entries in debian/control  foo-dev and foo-doc with the appropriate info
[06:36] <[GuS] > ok
[06:36] <bddebian> Then you can make foo-dev.install and foo-doc.install files
[07:12] <bddebian> slomo: You around by any chance?
[07:18] <AnAnt> ping lionelp
[07:19] <AnAnt> lionelp: I made an elinks-full package: http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=3106
[07:20] <AnAnt> bddebian: thanks for the REVU
[07:21] <bddebian> AnAnt: NP
[07:21] <AnAnt> bddebian: does that mean that you don't have any other comments about freedict ?
[07:21] <bddebian> AnAnt: Nope.  Fix the version and I'll advocate.
[07:21] <AnAnt> bddebian: thanks
[07:22] <bddebian> Sure
[07:23] <AnAnt> bddebian: regarding elinks-full, how am I supposed to remove the autoconf files if they are in the orig tarball ?
[07:24] <bddebian> AnAnt: I believe you can just rm them in your clean target but don't quote me on that :-(
[07:28] <Adri2000> hub: i fixed what you asked for djplay : http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=3122, if you and someone else can take a look at it :)
[08:16] <AnAnt> may I suggest something for the REVU tool ?
[08:19] <AnAnt> to make it possible to upload diffs only instead of having to re-upload the orig tarball every time
[08:30] <AnAnt> ping
[08:31] <bddebian> AnAnt: Who are you pinging? :-)
[08:31] <crimsun> AnAnt: spec it and implement it
[08:31] <bddebian> Heh
[08:31] <AnAnt> crimsun: huh ?
[08:31] <Spec> ok
[08:32] <crimsun> 14:19 < AnAnt> to make it possible to upload diffs only instead of having to re-upload the orig tarball every time
[08:32] <AnAnt> I don't understand
[08:32] <AnAnt> what is "spec it" ?
[08:32] <crimsun> write up the specifications
[08:32] <Spec> to write a spec
[08:32] <bddebian> AnAnt: He is telling you to create a spec and then make it happen :-)
[08:33] <AnAnt> who wrote REVU ?
[08:33] <Spec> it's like the rtfm of the developers world
[08:33] <crimsun> Reinhard, Andrew, and Stefan iirc
[08:33] <AnAnt> what ir rtfm ?
[08:34] <bddebian> OMG
[08:34] <AnAnt> ir=is
[08:34] <bddebian> RTFM == Read The F**king Manual
[08:34] <Spec> stfw = search the f**king web
[08:35] <Spec> and jgaawasfi = just go ahead and write a spec for it
[08:35] <siretart> AnAnt: patches are always welcome, sourcecode is as bzr registered in launchpad.
[08:35] <AnAnt> siretart: thanks
[08:35] <bddebian> Heya siretart
[08:35] <siretart> huhu bddebian
[08:36] <AnAnt> Spec: ftp = file transfer protocol , right ?
[08:37] <bddebian> And my favorite: UTSL :-)
[08:37] <AnAnt> Spec: well it also means "foiled twisted pair"
[08:37] <AnAnt> bddebian: what's that ?
[08:37] <bddebian> Use The Source Luke
[08:37] <AnAnt> who's Luke ?
[08:38] <bddebian> D00d, what planet are you from? :-)
[08:38] <AnAnt> d00d=dude, right ?
[08:38] <bddebian> Yes
[08:39] <AnAnt> all I know is that Luke is one of 4 : John, Luke, Paul, Mathew
[08:39] <bddebian> No, Luke Skywalker, aka Star Wars
[08:39] <bddebian> s/aka/a la/
[08:39] <AnAnt> oh ok
[08:40] <bddebian> You know, "Use the force, Luke".. :-)
[08:40] <AnAnt> well, it's me who should ask you, what galaxy are you from ?
[08:40] <AnAnt> I am talking about ppl from earth, you talk about ppl in star wars
[08:40] <bddebian> If I only knew.. :-)
[08:42] <AnAnt> crimsun: ok, what if I can write a spec, but I can't implement (I never wrote big software)
[08:43] <AnAnt> crimsun: is there someone to send  the suggestion ?
[08:46] <AnAnt> ping lionelp
[08:48] <Spec> luke is played by an actor from earth
[08:48] <crimsun> AnAnt: everyone starts at the "I haven't written big software" stage
[08:48] <Spec> the other luke ... who knows, it's just text in a book that some people wrote :)
[09:33] <ajmitch> morning
[09:34] <ivoks> hi ajmitch
[09:35] <bddebian> Heya ajmitch, ivoks
[09:35] <zul> f-spot?
[09:35] <ajmitch> they file a bug on a package in testing, and they know that the fix is in unstable & will get there in a day or two :)
[09:35] <ajmitch> no
[09:35] <ajmitch> but there are annoying bugs filed there
[09:45] <crimsun> pascal80 really needs to stop filing bug reports that ask for multiple source package syncs within one report.
[09:52] <Adri2000> bddebian: ping
[09:53] <bddebian> Adri2000: Yessir?
[09:53] <Bazzi> hmmm I need Hobbsee :(
[09:55] <Adri2000> bddebian: http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=3122 have you seen the upload of September 14 12:50, patches are listed in the changelog
[09:59] <bddebian> Hmm, maybe I didn't get the latest somehow..
[10:04] <Adri2000> ok, and about the manpage, i have nothing interessant to put in it :/ so is it very useful to create one ?
[10:09] <Adri2000> bddebian: sorry, i'm having connection problems on irc
[10:10] <Adri2000> i said about the manpage that i have nothing to put in it, so is it very useful to create one ?
[10:10] <bddebian> Adri2000: Is this a GUI app?
[10:17] <beligum> I think my first package is quite ready now; http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=3125 anyone care to review?
[10:17] <Adri2000> yes
[10:20] <LaserJock> crimsun: "do not catalyse the sync process."? how professorly of you ;-)
[10:30] <Adri2000> bddebian: can you add a comment to the last upload ?
[10:31] <seth> beligum, you include FreeSans.ttf, but Ubuntu already includes this font. You should reference the user's local copy and not install your own
[10:33] <beligum> seth: with a symlink for now, and then changing the code for the next upstream release ?
[10:34] <seth> beligum, ah, you're the upstream author. Don't worry about it for this release
[10:34] <beligum> ok
[10:35] <seth> does your code actually reference that font? or does it copy it into the fonts directory, or what
[10:41] <bddebian> Adri2000: Yeah in a bit, sorry I'm at work
[10:43] <Adri2000> no problem, when you have some time
[10:43] <beligum> seth: what does the changelog-entry date stand for?
[10:43] <beligum> seth: the code references the font
[10:45] <seth> beligum, what do you mean about the changelog entry date? It should set automatically when you update the changelog with dch
[10:46] <beligum> seth: oh, didn't know that
[10:46] <seth> okay, just wasn't sure what you were asking about it :)
[10:46] <seth> beligum, it seems like non-optimal behavior to have an application use a font different than my current system fonts... not harmful, just maybe unexpected?
[10:46] <seth> but definitely not a showstopper problem
[10:46] <thansen> I'm trying to install the mono-xsp packages on edgy but it's crapping out...can anyone help me for a sec?
[10:47] <beligum> ok, I'll take care of it in the next release
[11:08] <crimsun> LaserJock: tact goes a long way.
[11:08] <crimsun> (or sometimes not at all, but it's arguably "better" than simply screaming)
[11:08] <seaLne> anyone else willing to look at http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=3123 ?
[11:09] <ajmitch> crimsun: words such as those may do wonders for the forums :)
[11:10] <seaLne> but more likely just confuse them
[11:12] <LaserJock> crimsun: true
[11:13] <ajmitch> LaserJock, crimsun: want to schedule another REVU day asap?
[11:14] <ajmitch> like in the next few days
[11:20] <LaserJock> ajmitch: we could certainly use it
[11:20] <LaserJock> do we have any stats on the last one
[11:20] <ajmitch> no idea
[11:20] <LaserJock> my impression was that it didn't get much action
[11:21] <ajmitch> LaserJock: well if we can get something done, it'd be good
[11:21] <ajmitch> raphink would be willing to help out, I'm sure :)
[11:22] <ajmitch> raphink: hi!
[11:22] <raphink> hi ajmitch
[11:22] <ajmitch> we're talking about having another REVu day
[11:22] <LaserJock> that's what we need
[11:22] <raphink> what are you talking about?
[11:22] <LaserJock> to get a group of reviewers together
[11:22] <ajmitch> LaserJock: which is why I asked you :)
[11:23] <raphink> ok
[11:25] <LaserJock> crimsun: is there *any* good times/days for you?
[11:25] <LaserJock> I'm of course totally swamped, but if we decide on a  day I'll try to clear it up as much as possible
[11:25] <LaserJock> ajmitch: anonymous?
[11:25] <ajmitch> LaserJock: well, not really, just a comment out of the channel
[11:26] <ajmitch> LaserJock: monday/tuesday? or is a weekend better?
[11:26] <LaserJock> weekend is not good for me
[11:26] <LaserJock> as long as I want to stay married
[11:26] <LaserJock> ... which I do
[11:27] <LaserJock> how's monday?
[11:27] <ajmitch> sounds good to me
[11:28] <ajmitch> if someone can put out a call for all willing MOTUs on the -devel & -motu lists
[11:29] <LaserJock> hmm, should I rather sent it to -devel-announce and -motu?
[11:31] <LaserJock> bddebian: can you do Monday?
[11:32] <bddebian> I do every day homeboy :-)
[11:32] <ajmitch> bddebian: then get to it!
[11:33] <bddebian> Uhm..
[11:40] <seaLne> bddebian: those man pages took ages to write :)
[11:47] <bddebian> seaLne: :-)
[11:51] <seaLne> i hate writeing man pages now and if i find the guy that wrote a format that randomly falls over because you have a double space it won't be pleasant
[11:51] <bddebian> Heh, no kidding :)
[11:52] <seaLne> and randomly for no reason that i can see it wouldn't allow me to include upstream authors email
[11:52] <seaLne> when i did it just corrupted from theat point on
[11:52] <bddebian> Nice
[12:04] <bddebian> Later gang
[12:04] <bddebian> Adri2000: I hit djplay again