[12:15] <Ubugtu> New bug: #64599 in ubiquity "Installer should check partitionsize" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/64599
[01:20] <Villarroel> Hi / Hola.
[01:21] <Villarroel> I forgot my registration email!
[01:46] <Ubugtu> New bug: #64610 in malone "Finding/reporting bugs through launchpad is cumbersome" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/64610
[10:08] <jenda> Hello
[10:09] <jenda> I wanted to assign a wikipage to a spec, but found that there already is a spec assigned to that wiki. Is there a way to find that spec?
[10:09] <jenda> (no, it's not linked on the wiki)
[12:49] <lucasvo> where did the calendar go?
[12:49] <lucasvo> I can't find the link to create one
[01:33] <jenda> lucasvo: it's temporarily disabled.
[01:34] <lucasvo> why?
[01:35] <Nafallo> to many bugs and ENOTIME to fix them.
[03:01] <ddaa> it was not considered up to standard for 1.0, and there was no time to fix that
[03:06] <lucasvo> ddaa: that's not very good, to first put it in and afterwards move it back out
[03:06] <lucasvo> but I guess I have to live with it.
[03:06] <lucasvo> will 1.0 be opensource?
[03:07] <ddaa> I think not. That will come in its own time.
[03:08] <ddaa> lucasvo: what with asking for a launchpad source code release, I do not really understand, do people ask for a Google release?
[03:08] <lucasvo> ddaa: I try to avoid using google
[03:08] <lucasvo> ddaa: and yes, I would ask them but I knwo they wouldn't do it
[03:09] <lucasvo> ddaa: the google search algorythm would be easy exploitable if it was open 
[03:10] <ddaa> lucasvo: I do not really want to have that argument
[03:10] <lucasvo> ddaa: that does not apply for launchpad
[03:10] <lucasvo> ddaa: ok..
[03:11] <jelmer> hi ddaa, lucasvo
[03:11] <lucasvo> hi jelmer
[03:12] <ddaa> launchpad is service, work we do on infrastructure software we try to get integrated upstream, and I want to release some infrastructure we put a lot of work into.
[03:12] <ddaa> Eventually launchpad will be released because Canonical understands how that can be beneficial, but there are business reasons to wait for the right time for that.
[03:13] <ddaa> jelmer: https://features.launchpad.net/products/bzr/+spec/smartserver-accept-svn
[03:13] <lucasvo> ddaa: yes. I wouldn't create my own launchpad just becuase it's opensource. I would still use official launchpad. But I try to use only opensource software for opensource development
[03:14] <ddaa> lucasvo: we can have this discussion in private if you want
[03:18] <jelmer> ddaa: Yeah, I saw that. tbh, I think a bzr backend to svn would make more sense
[03:20] <jelmer> trying to avoid the protocol implementation if we can
[03:20] <jelmer> for example, a lot of people use svn+ssh:// or https://, and smartserver-accept-svn will require separate implementations for those
[03:21] <jelmer> Where am I supposed to give feedback ? In the wiki?
[03:30] <lucasvo> jelmer: yes
[03:33] <ddaa> jelmer: I guessed you'd have insights about implementation.
[03:33] <ddaa> Whatever floats the boat. I was wondering whether libsvn was layered to allow reusing the server front-end.
[03:34] <jelmer> Well, the question is whether we can define bzr in terms of their fs backends
[03:34] <jelmer> (so you can have fsfs, bdb and bzr)
[03:34] <ddaa> mh... dunno, probably not I guess.
[03:34] <ddaa> I think we might have to be a bit higher level than that.
[03:35] <jelmer> that would be ideal, otherwise, we'd have to figure out how to reuse some of the higher level code
[03:35] <ddaa> the one-huge-versioned-fs model is not a good fit to bzr
[03:35] <ddaa> so I expect we would have to restrict some functionality
[03:36] <jelmer> Hmm, indeed
[03:54] <lucasvo> cya ddaa
[05:41] <sivang> is launchpad down?
[05:41] <sivang> I seem to not be able to view access it at all...
[05:45] <dsas> sivang: I can browse it
[05:46] <sivang> dsas: k, was something local with the network here, thanks
[09:44] <SteveA> _thumper_away_: ping
[09:53] <SteveA> _thumper_away_: unping
[10:31] <mpt> Goooooooooooooooooooood morning Launchpadders!
[10:41] <lucasvo> hi mpt
[11:50] <Ubugtu> New bug: #64758 in blueprint ""Change status" link appears even if I don't have permission to use it" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/64758