[12:31] <funman> crimsun ?
[12:33] <crimsun> funman: hi
[12:34] <funman> i'm just looking at your mail
[12:34] <funman> the fix is in 3 changesets
[12:34] <funman> it was fixed by me, then i fixed my fix, and finally someone cleverer than me fixed the whole thing
[12:35] <funman> :)
[12:35] <funman> 16949, 16953, 16956
[12:35] <crimsun> funman: thanks, I'll do that tonight
[12:35] <popey> mjg59: ping
[12:35] <mjg59> popey: Hi
[12:35] <popey> hi, that MP-BIOS bug seems to be somewhat erratic
[12:35] <popey> sometimes the machine boot fine, sometimes not
[12:36] <popey> now it seems to be fine, tried warm and cold
[12:36] <mjg59> Hm
[12:36] <popey> also, don't know if it's related but the cpu frequency doofer in gnome claims that this cpu doesn't support frequency scaling
[12:37] <mjg59> What is it?
[12:37] <popey> core2duo
[12:37] <mjg59> Ok, so that's clearly a lie
[12:37] <mjg59> Can you pastebin your dmesg?
[12:37] <popey> :)
[12:37] <popey> yus
[12:37] <popey> http://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/25928/
[12:39] <mjg59> popey: What happens if you try to modprobe speedstep-centrino?
[12:39] <popey> FATAL: Error inserting speedstep_centrino (/lib/modules/2.6.17-10-generic/kernel/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.ko): No such device
[12:39] <mjg59> And anything added to dmesg?
[12:39] <popey> no
[12:39] <mjg59> un
[12:39] <mjg59> Fun
[12:40] <popey> report bug?
[12:40] <mjg59> Yeah
[12:40] <Fujitsu> popey, you mean it fails to boot about 1 in 20 or 30 boots?
[12:40] <popey> Fujitsu: yeah, possibly more frequently than that
[12:41] <Fujitsu> I've got a Dell Inspiron 630m (PM 1.6GHz) that does the same, although it's not very frequent.
[12:41] <popey> mjg59: what else shall I tack on the bug report besides dmesg? lspci -vv ?
[12:41] <Fujitsu> But I have got frequency scaling.
[12:41] <mjg59> popey: Nah, lspci isn't useful
[12:44] <popey> ok, done, bug 64605
[12:44] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 64605 in linux-source-2.6.17 "No frequency scaling on Core2Duo " [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/64605
[12:44] <popey> thanks mjg59 
[02:23] <Hobbsee> BenC: you around?
[03:58] <mjg59> Hurrah!
[03:59] <ajmitch> excellent!
[03:59] <_ion> What was the problem?
[04:00] <mjg59> No idea
[04:00] <mjg59> I've updated the x86emu code used
[04:00] <mjg59> And now it seems happy
[04:10] <mjg59> Awh crpa.
[04:15] <mjg59> Grah.
[04:16] <mjg59> So it /did/ work
[04:16] <mjg59> And now it works no longer
[04:16] <_ion> Ouch.
[04:21] <mjg59> Damnit.
[04:23] <mjg59> Clearly something I did at some point changed the state of the chip in some way
[05:03] <_ion> Re: bug 64324, does usplash use svgalib on Macs?
[05:03] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 64324 in usplash "usplash screen corrupted on old iBook" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/64324
[05:06] <_ion> mjg59: Btw, the picture someone attached to bug 64624 is exactly what usplash looks like on my computer.
[05:06] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 64624 in usplash "[edgy]  usplash corrupted" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/64624
[12:32] <finalbeta> Edgy does spell checking in xchat 2. Will spell checking be available in more programs in the future as an operating system option? or does this remain an individual program choice? Can one change languages in the fly? Personally I have to use two all the time, and a third every X time.
[12:34] <highvoltage> finalbeta: best to ask on #ubuntu
[12:35] <finalbeta> It's edgy tech. But it's more a question as to where the dev team is going to take this.
[12:36] <Treenaks> this is a channel about development, not user questions
[03:02] <bddebian> Howdy
[03:03] <highvoltage> howdy, bddebian!
[03:04] <bddebian> Heya highvoltage
[04:33] <Fade> quiet in here today.
[04:34] <HiddenWolf> Fade: it's sunday, everyone with half a brain or half a life is taking a day off. :)
[04:36] <funman> i guess we have none of both :/
[04:37] <HiddenWolf> :)
[05:47] <Fade> HiddenWolf: heh. I wish I had both. ;) I'm stuck at werk today.
[06:11] <smurf> cupsys bug: removing usb printer #0 hides any other USB printer you might have. Duh.
[06:13] <HiddenWolf> Fade: ugh, nice job. :)
[06:14] <Treenaks> but now it's almost done \o/
[06:16] <HiddenWolf> heh, write loads of code for mine too, pretty please? :P
[06:32] <Fade> so this xemacs situation is seriously getting on my nerves.
[06:33] <pepsiman> use gvim instead
[06:34] <Fade> https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/xemacs21/+bug/57586
[06:34] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 57586 in xemacs21 "XEmacs segfaults on startup in Edgy" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  
[06:34] <Fade> I think that should be confirmed. reported on two arches now. :(
[08:43] <tortoise_> onboard has just been put into main but unfortunately a dodgy revision was picked up from bzr that has loads of bugs.  Is there any way this can be updated before release?
[08:45] <Burgundavia> tortoise_: file a bug against it
[08:46] <sivang> tortoise_: and I'd also say subscribe ubuntu-core-dev team
[08:49] <tortoise_> Burgundavia sivang: ok
[08:52] <tortoise_> Burgundavia: What do I file a bug against? If i file it against onboard only I get notified an I can't do anything about it
[08:53] <Burgundavia> tortoise_: against onboard. If ou cannot file a bug against it, file a bug against Malone about not being able to file a bu
[08:55] <tfheen> sivang: no, don't subscribe ubuntu-core-dev.
[08:56] <sivang> tfheen: oh, oops sorry 
[08:56] <sivang> tfheen: I just noticed the maintainer is 'ubuntu-core-dev'
[08:56] <tfheen> tortoise_: please file a bug against onboard and tell me the bug #.  I'll target it for 6.10 so we'll pick it up.
[08:56] <sivang> tfheen: so my poor reasoning followed
[08:56] <tortoise_> tfheen: thnaks
[09:00] <RicardoPerez> doko: ping
[09:00] <sivang> tortoise_: fixing this would be as simple as pulling latest branch into the ubuntu package?
[09:01] <tortoise_> sivang: yep
[09:01] <tortoise_> revision 38 from http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~onboard/onboard/main
[09:01] <sivang> hi ivoks 
[09:02] <ivoks> hi
[09:02] <sivang> ivoks: did you manage to have a connection with pygi?
[09:02] <ivoks> i didn't spoke with him for couple of days
[09:02] <sivang> ivoks: are you able to text him?
[09:03] <ivoks> no :/
[09:03] <sivang> ah, I see never mind, thanks anyway
[09:03] <ivoks> what's the problem?
[09:03] <sivang> :)
[09:03] <sivang> ivoks: we're having issue swith spammers spamming all over libburn in trac
[09:03] <ivoks> :)
[09:04] <tortoise_> tfheen: https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/onboard/+bug/64736
[09:04] <sivang> ivoks: I suggested switching to LP, and some other devs suggested other login protected solutions. bottom line, we need to talk to him to see what he says.
[09:04] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 64736 in onboard "Bad revision picked up from bzr - many bugs" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  
[09:04] <sivang> tfheen: I can probably do this "fix", will it require UVF or so ?
[09:05] <ivoks> sivang: i think he'll be ok with LP, but, of course, you should contact him
[09:05] <sivang> ivoks: indeed.
[09:05] <tfheen> sivang: I'd prefer to have Henrik's input on it, actually.
[09:06] <sivang> tfheen: okay, sure.
[09:37] <Fade> tfheen: I have a workaround for that xemacs bug.
[09:38] <tfheen> Fade: oh?
[09:39] <Fade> the fact that it segfaults is an upstream bug, but basically it was dying due to font resolution.
[09:39] <Fade> reordering the font loadpaths in xorg.conf works around the problem.
[09:41] <Fade> I think this might be related to defoma, but if the xorg.conf has been brought forward from an older ubuntu installation, the font lines in the configuration file cause a bunch of applications to have conniptions.
[09:42] <Fade> in xemacs' case, it results in a segfault, but it also fixes the GNU emacs problem I tied to that bug report. I'll add another comment to my bug when I get back from dinner.
[09:44] <dtamas> hi! I just want to know, when will firefox 2.0b update to rc2? or it will be change to iceweasel?
[09:47] <dtamas> where can i get answer to this question?
[09:50] <gnomefreak> dtamas: i doubt it will be before release but i cant answer that for sure
[09:51] <dtamas> ok, thanks
[10:16] <windshear_> hello
[10:18] <windshear_> i have a problem with the kernel, it hangs on the first time after shutdown that i try to boot,   the second try works
[10:18] <windshear_> i've removed the quite splash option from the kernel
[10:19] <windshear_> i can now see that it hangs at usb 3-2: usb disconnect, adress 3
[10:19] <windshear_> anyone know why I always have to try 2 times to be able to boot?
[10:42] <robertj_> would patches be accepted that allowed gksu & friends to use the keychain?
[11:35] <probono> hi all, i'd like to bring your attention to bug # 59779 - the solution is stated there as well but i don't know who would need to take action to implement the solution
[11:35] <probono> https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/casper/+bug/59779
[11:35] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 59779 in klik "Loop-mount doesn't work on Live CD (Casper)" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  
[11:37] <gnomefreak> probono: the people that need to know know about it he even replied to the bug
[11:38] <probono> gnomefreak, thank you
[11:39] <gnomefreak> yw
[11:45] <mjg59> Right. usplash palette issue sorted
[11:46] <HiddenWolf> unless I'm mistaking you did that in your off-hours. :)
[11:47] <mjg59> "off-hours"?
[11:47] <mjg59> You realise I don't work for Canonical, right? :)
[11:47] <HiddenWolf> You don't? *feels reality hit with a thud*
[11:48] <HiddenWolf> You do so much work, I just assumed. :)
[11:48] <mjg59> The only time I have to work on this stuff is my off-hours...
[11:48] <HiddenWolf> Still, messing with usplash on a sunday-night deserves a hug. Doubly so now. :)
[11:49] <zul> ...or a beer
[11:49] <mjg59> Bleah. Right, dapper kernel doesn't magically make X start working again.
[11:49] <mjg59> (over suspend/resume)
[11:49] <HiddenWolf> zul: beer-over-irc protocol isn't yet perfect. I wouldn't want to get freenode wet.
[11:50] <mjg59> Hrm.
[11:50] <mjg59> Reinstalling this machine would be awkward.