=== porkpie [n=mark@cpc1-bsfd5-0-0-cust929.cmbg.cable.ntl.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [12:59] BenC:hi [01:18] zul / BenC: Do you know if that ich8 fix has made it into a daily yet? I'm looking at training down to london to get this machine going next weekend and don't want to waste any money :p [01:19] notice/pm if you prefer === _MMA_ [n=mma@cpe-071-070-203-016.nc.res.rr.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === _MMA_ [n=mma@cpe-071-070-203-016.nc.res.rr.com] has left #ubuntu-kernel [] === human_blip [n=mike@220.157.65.29] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === jldugger [n=jldugger@adsl-66-142-214-78.dsl.tpkaks.swbell.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === jldugger [n=jldugger@adsl-66-142-214-78.dsl.tpkaks.swbell.net] has left #ubuntu-kernel ["Leaving"] === rodarvus [n=rodarvus@ubuntu/member/rodarvus] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === zul_ [n=chuck@CPE0006258ec6c1-CM000a73655d0e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === tonfa_ [n=tonfa@footwar.residence.ens-lyon.fr] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === Lure [n=lure@ubuntu/member/lure] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [09:01] zul_: hmm, isn't the master branch of the xen repo supposed to be 2.6.17 now? [09:02] there's an ubuntu-xen-2.6.17 repository [09:02] but it doesn't have the changes of the last week [09:03] oh, there's another repo, not just a branch? [09:03] yep === tonfa_ is now known as tonfa === mayday_jay [n=mayday_j@maydayjay.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === Keybuk [n=scott@syndicate.netsplit.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [10:20] BenC: hi did you manage to build the power edge 1950 kernel ??? [12:07] BenC: are you or somebody else working on a main inclusion report for kexec-tools? === gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === rodarvus [n=rodarvus@ubuntu/member/rodarvus] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === zul [n=chuck@CPE0006258ec6c1-CM000a73655d0e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === AnAnt [n=anant@81.10.9.182] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [01:59] anyone knows the difference between -386 & -generic kernels ? [02:01] generic is x86 + x86_64 [02:01] No it isn't [02:02] generic supports SMP. -386 doesn't. [02:02] -386 supports a small number of drivers that -generic doesn't. [02:02] mjg59: then the info in dpkg is wrong :) [02:02] ic [02:02] mjg59: so for dual core I would use -generic ? [02:03] tonfa: No, the description is unclear, but that's because the package name is the same on x86 and amd64 [02:03] AnAnt: Yes === tuxmaniac [n=aanjhan@unaffiliated/tuxmaniac] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [02:04] mjg59: thanks === AnAnt [n=anant@81.10.9.182] has left #ubuntu-kernel [] [02:10] tfheeE: Does kexec-tools need to be in main? [02:11] tfheen: ^^ [02:12] mj59: Patches I have from you are the toshiba fix and the shut-up patch...is that it? [02:12] BenC: either that, or linux-image-kdump must be demoted to universe. [02:13] tfheen: I'd rather the latter [02:13] BenC: There's two that I put with bugs in launchpad [02:13] #61981 is one [02:13] what's the other? [02:13] BenC: Uh. That is, there should also be a Sony fix [02:13] 61981 is the toshiba_acpi [02:14] BenC: ok. It's currently listed in supported, so we need to change it there. [02:14] There should also be a diff for libata [02:15] BenC: Subject: [PATCH] - fix regression in suspending on some Toshibas [02:15] mjg59: the toshiba fix is the libata one [02:15] No [02:16] "..on some Toshibas" :) [02:16] BenC: isn't the kexec thingy part of some spec of yours? [02:16] the toshiba_acpi one is different [02:16] Oh, right [02:16] Sorry - you've got both of those. Ok. [02:16] tfheen: Yes, but it isn't completed...there's a lack of usable userspace stuff to capture the dumps [02:17] BenC: ok [02:17] BenC: https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.17/+bug/61515 [02:18] mjg59: Do you think the libata patch will also fix: https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.17/+bug/64430 ? [02:19] BenC: If you want it demoted, can you change debian/control to toss the -kdump stuff in universe/devel, so my beain doesn't bleed when processing queue/new for ABI bumps? [02:19] infinity: Sure thing [02:20] Oh, not that it will have an ABI bump anyway, cause it's a single unversioned package.. [02:21] BenC: What was the rationale for that, rather than having it versioned and using linux-meta? [02:22] infinity: Because kdump is not really important enough to follow an ABI...it just needs to boot to an initrafs and capture the dump [02:23] infinity: Also, I don't want it to be possible for there to be 4-20 kdump kernels laying around through ABI bumps [02:23] is there anything other than a bad hd that would cause noise on shutdown? [02:23] he filed it under kernel thats why i ask here [02:25] BenC: Sounds fair. [02:25] BenC: Nope [02:25] gnomefreak: What sort of "noise"? [02:25] BenC: That seems to be some bizarre conflict between the radeon drm and e1000 [02:26] gnomefreak: PCI bus contention (which is both the fault of hardware and drivers, pick one) can cause garbled noise out of sound cards sometimes. [02:26] he found an already reported bug after bugging me all morning :( it seems it on one type of laptop [02:27] gnomefreak: Which bug? [02:28] http://launchpad.net/bugs/63937 and now he tells me his dell is doing it [02:29] I've no idea what "a sound like in the case of disk failure" means [02:29] Anyway, I've got a Dell [02:30] me too but i dont have sata === Hobbsee [n=Hobbsee@ubuntu/member/hobbsee] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [02:31] mjg59: btw, I looked over the diff between dapper and edgy's ata_piix, and none of the PCI id's were lost [02:32] I'm hoping that the changes to the guts don't cause any problems [02:32] BenC: Right, but the change in the mapping stuff will impact some people [02:32] The earlier driver has less idea about whether a port is SATA or PATA [02:32] but it's weird, I tried stock 2.6.17 source, and it breaks for a lot of newer ich8 chipsets [02:33] ok, well, those people will have to deal with it, unless I get that board from montreal in time to debug the 2.6.17 stock driver === JanC [n=janc@lugwv/member/JanC] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [02:56] BenC: What priority should regressions from dapper with easy fixes be? [02:56] mjg59: high [02:57] BenC: I've just linked to a patch in 60231 [03:12] BenC:Hi === gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === kylem_ [n=kyle@206-248-151-76.dsl.ncf.ca] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === ..[topic/#ubuntu-kernel:BenC] : Ubuntu kernel development discussion ONLY | Kernel GIT tree info (updated): https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelGitGuide | 2.6.17-10.29 uploaded. | Daily kernel builds (for debug and testing purposes only) http://people.ubuntu.com/~bcollins/kernels-daily/ | Kernel Wiki: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CategoryKernel | KernelFreeze in effect [03:29] porkpie: Hey [03:36] BenC:Hi [03:36] BenC:How are you [03:37] BenC:Did you manage to finish the Kernel === kbyrd [n=Miranda@mailout1.vmware.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [03:43] porkpie: I got side tracked with edgy kernel stuff, I'll try to get it uploaded today [03:44] OK ...cool [03:45] BenC:we are desperate ...now [03:49] porkpie: should be ready in about 30-45 minutes [03:53] BenC:excellent ....I owe you a beer or 3 [03:54] BenC:we have complied the debian x86_64 smp kernel and it boots OK but we don't see multiple cpu's in top [04:37] BenC:hi ....are we there :) [04:37] BenC: Have you fixed the acx111 firmware version stuff? [04:38] mjg59: Fixed it how? [04:38] BenC: Set the correct default version [04:38] yeah [04:38] Ok, cool [04:38] BenC:hi [04:39] porkpie: Almost done...taking longer than I thought [04:39] BenC:Sorry I am chasing....I am being chased === gila [n=gila@cc785458-a.ensch1.ov.home.nl] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [05:15] BenC:Hello .....is it done boss === kylem_ is now known as kylem [05:28] porkpie: give me a little bit, I'll let you know when it's done [05:29] OK [06:00] porkpie: 15 minutes [06:10] porkpie: Damnit, I built the dapper-security git repo, and not the updates one...starting a fresh build [06:31] BenC: ...:( [06:31] BenC:how long will it take ...40 mins === Lure [n=lure@ubuntu/member/lure] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === zul [n=chuck@CPE0006258ec6c1-CM000a73655d0e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === Lure [n=lure@ubuntu/member/lure] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [07:29] BenC:hey === zorglu_ [n=zorglub@134.43.102-84.rev.gaoland.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === Keybuk [n=scott@syndicate.netsplit.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [07:54] q. i run a 2.6.15-26-386 but the kernel header for it are no more in the repository (based on apt-get on my local box or from ubotu), how come ? is this a mistake or made on purpose ? === lloydinho [n=andreas@host81-159-84-6.range81-159.btcentralplus.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === gila [n=gila@cc785458-a.ensch1.ov.home.nl] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [08:29] BenC:how's the fresh build going ?? [08:29] porkpie: Still running [08:30] hey [08:31] OK ....how long do you think it will take ? :) === Lure [n=lure@ubuntu/member/lure] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === rodarvus [n=rodarvus@ubuntu/member/rodarvus] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === zul_ [n=chuck@CPE0006258ec6c1-CM000a73655d0e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [09:13] BenC:are you about sir ? === rodarvus [n=rodarvus@ubuntu/member/rodarvus] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [09:48] porkpie_: Yeah, let me check the build [09:51] porkpie_: Another compile failure, restart with a fix [09:51] porkpie_: BTW, you can keep checking http://people.ubuntu.com/~bcollins/kernels/ for when it's ready === SFA_AOK [n=chatzill@host86-138-118-241.range86-138.btcentralplus.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === Lure [n=lure@ubuntu/member/lure] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === johanbr [n=j@d154-20-238-192.bchsia.telus.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === jldugger [n=jldugger@adsl-66-142-214-78.dsl.tpkaks.swbell.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === BenC [n=bcollins@debian/developer/bcollins] has joined #ubuntu-kernel === svu_ [n=svu@83.167.239.56] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [11:58] BenC, ping? [11:58] svu_: does the latest linux-restricted-modules work for you? [11:59] svu:pong [11:59] tfheen, that's what I was going to complain:) restructed acx module works on x86 but not on ppc64smp [11:59] it cannot load firmware for some reason === Keybuk [n=scott@syndicate.netsplit.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel [12:00] [ 547.921561] acx: Loaded combined PCI/USB driver, firmware_ver=default [12:00] [ 547.921574] acx: compiled to use 32bit I/O access. I/O timing issues might occur, such as non-working firmware upload. Report them [12:00] [ 547.923361] acx_usb: probe of 4-2.2:1.0 failed with error -5 [12:00] [ 547.923390] usbcore: registered new driver acx_usb [12:00] [ [12:00] that's what I get in dmesg [12:00] ouch, ok [12:00] you want BenC then, yes, agreed. [12:00] the dmesg explains it [12:01] BenC, what's wrong with the probe? [12:01] what are the missing lines? [12:01] nothing is missing here === svu_ can send entire dmesg if it is any help [12:03] -5 == EIO, I/O error [12:03] but it is the same hardware, on both x86 and ppc - some old usb wifi dongle [12:04] so it is IO error within USB host or smth [12:05] not a firmware upload error it seems [12:05] not sure [12:05] I'd need you to compile acx with debug enabled [12:06] BenC, NP. Just show me the way. apt-get source it? [12:06] topic has some links [12:06] using git [12:07] ok, I'll try. [12:07] thanks a bunch === gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-kernel