[12:35] <Ubugtu> New bug: #66485 in malone ""show only duplicates" in advanced search options" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/66485
[12:40] <Ubugtu> New bug: #66486 in malone "subscribe reporter of dupe to original bug report" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/66486
[12:40] <Ubugtu> New bug: #66488 in malone "mark as duplicate should automatically reject a bug" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/66488
[01:00] <Ubugtu> New bug: #66490 in launchpad "display /calculation error for top contributors?" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/66490
[02:59] <mpt> Goooooooooooooooooood afternoon Launchpadders!
[06:02] <stub> Launchpad will be going down for about an hour in around 30 minutes time. Longer than usual downtime this week due to some data migration that needs doing.
[06:41] <jamesh> mpt: https://devpad.canonical.com/~jamesh/images/formlayout-product-new.png <- that's the new form layout with the (optional) tags
[06:42] <jamesh> mpt: for a smaller screen, it wouldn't leave much room for the actual form fields
[06:45] <stub> Gah... screwed up my cherry picking.
[06:58] <stub> Launchpad is going down in 15 minutes for a code update and data migration work. Estimated downtime is 1 hour but will hopefully be significantly less.
[07:07] <mpt> jamesh, nice work!
[07:09] <mpt> holy crap our product registration page is full of silly fields
[07:11] <jamesh> mpt: the alternative would be to put the (optional) text on a line below the main label.  What do you think?
[07:13] <stub> We should just strip out most of the optional fields, maybe with a note on the form informing that other fields can be set by clicking on the 'Edit' link after product creation. imo :)
[07:13] <stub> We already do this for Person I think.
[07:13] <mpt> yeah
[07:13] <stub> Display name and email address and off you go
[07:13] <mpt> but really, screenshots URL? wiki URL? We're not babysitters for their own Web site's design
[07:14] <mpt> Why not Weblog URL and news URL and release notes URL? :-)
[07:19] <mpt> jamesh, I think putting it on a separate line would look weird
[07:19] <mpt> The other option would be to put it after the field instead of before
[07:20] <jamesh> mpt: sure, but my browser window is almost 1280 pixels wide and the labels are taking up ~ a third of the content area
[07:20] <jamesh> I am not sure it'd be usable at lower resolutions
[07:21] <mpt> ok, try "(Optional)" after the field instead of before
[07:22] <mpt> That won't narrow wide optional rows, but it will narrow wide compulsory rows, because their labels aren't being padded by the "(Optional)" in other rows
[07:24] <mpt> It would be nice if Zope allowed form field widths specified in percentages rather than mysterious-HTML-units
[07:25] <mpt> (iirc 1 HTML width unit = the width of the letter "a" in sans-serif, or something like that)
[07:29] <jamesh> I would have thought they'd base it on digit width
[07:37] <lifeless> jamesh: which digit ;)
[07:38] <jml> lifeless: the thumb.
[07:39] <lifeless> thumbwars! return of the palm
[08:08] <lifeless> spiv: what did you need to do to get sodium running your cgi-stuff? just drop it in ~/public_html/cgi-bin ?
[08:09] <spiv> lifeless: I think so, let me take a look
[08:10] <spiv> lifeless: in fact, just in ~/public_html, named *.cgi
[08:10] <spiv> (and chmod +x, obviously)
[08:21] <mpt> gah, Launchpad's still down
[08:35] <stub> Having a few postgresql issues - trying to sort out now (data migration scripts are still running anyway)
[08:41] <jamesh> mpt: https://devpad.canonical.com/~jamesh/images/formlayout-product-new2.png <- look better?
[08:56] <mpt> jamesh, not noticably better or worse, but if that makes them more compact, it's fine
[08:56] <jamesh> mpt: it also doesn't affect the width of required fields, which is nice
[09:49] <lifeless> jamesh: looks nice to me
[10:13] <_thumper_> having major connectivity problems - on phone to isp now
[10:21] <stub> Launchpad, inc soyuz, is back up
[10:25] <mpt> oh, perfect timing, just as I finish for the day :-P
[10:39] <mpt> oy, what's happened to the portlet headings
[10:40] <mpt> They don't look like that on localhost
[10:40] <jamesh> mpt: cached CSS, maybe?
[10:41] <mpt> that was my first thought, and my second thought was "bother, I forgot to change the style sheet from launchpad.css to launchpad.css?foo=1"
[10:42] <mpt> but then I shift-reloaded and it's the same
[10:42] <jamesh> what page is looking wrong?
[10:42] <mpt> Any page with a portlet
[10:42] <mpt> but ... not in Firefox
[10:43] <lifeless> why does clicking through to translate my language show me translated applications first ?
[10:43] <lifeless> surely it should be untransalted first ?
[10:43] <lifeless> specifically, https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/dapper/+lang/en_AU
[10:43] <mpt> mmmm, transalted
[10:43] <stub> Making me hungry
[10:43] <stub> Ooh.... missed lunch
[10:44] <mpt> eh, must be a Safari problem, doesn't occur in Opera either
[10:44] <jamesh> blame andersca and maciej
[10:45] <mpt> It's even fine in Konqueror!
[10:46] <mpt> so I think I'll blame maciej and hyatt
[10:46] <lifeless> hmm
[10:47] <lifeless> 'canonical ltd, a holding company..'
[10:47] <lifeless> in the ubuntu desktop guide.
[10:47] <lifeless> that seems...wrong
[10:47] <jamesh> holding companies don't usually have so many employees
[10:47] <mpt> It is wrong if it has that capitalization
[10:47] <lifeless> it doesn't
[10:48] <lifeless> its grammar and punctuation is correct
[10:48] <lifeless> the content is whack
[10:48] <jamesh> holding companies usually have far fewer employees than their subsidiaries
[10:48] <lifeless> and hold things
[10:48] <lifeless> like other company shares
[10:48] <mpt> When Keybuk was on LugRadio someone referred to him as a Canonical employee, and he said, "Actually, I don'... never mind"
[10:48] <lifeless> or patents
[10:48] <lifeless> mpt: cause he works for Fieldwave
[10:48] <mpt> I know :-)
[10:49] <lifeless> which is technically subcontracted.
[10:49] <mpt> that too.
[10:50] <jamesh> mpt: https://launchpad.net/malone/bugtrackers/sf <- single SourceForge tracker entry now.
[10:50] <mpt> yay
[10:50] <mpt> So previously we had 14 Sourceforge entries for only 39 bug links? ouch
[10:51] <jamesh> 13 fewer tracker entries doesn't hurt ...
[10:51] <mpt> oh, I agree entirely, I just hadn't realized *quite* how silly the previous situation was :-)
[10:53] <Kamion> can I delete bug watches? the one on bug 44468 is crack
[10:53] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 44468 in Debian "Flight 7 Live CD Ubiquity Installer - Partitioning" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/44468
[10:55] <Ubugtu> New bug: #66515 in launchpad "Portlet headings look wrong in Safari" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/66515
[10:55] <mpt> Kamion, alas, that's bug 3140
[10:55] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 3140 in malone "Bug watches can't be removed" [High,Confirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/3140
[10:57] <stub> Perhaps we should just back Launchpad onto GoogleBase
[10:58] <jamesh> Kamion: you can edit the bug watch if there is an appropriate alternative
[10:58] <jamesh> but I doubt there is
[10:58] <Kamion> there is not
[10:59] <Kamion> (the Debian task is bogus too)
[10:59] <BjornT> mpt: do you have a quick suggestion for how the ui would look like for deleting bug watches? i don't see an obvious way of incorporating that functionality in the current ui.
[10:59] <jamesh> you could ask stub to remove it then ...
[10:59] <mpt> Yes, our current UI for that lives in Thailand
[11:00] <stub> handsum bug watch. I delete you now.
[11:00] <jamesh> stub: I found another tracker that should have been merged into "sf" -- emailed you the details plus SQL to clean it up
[11:01] <mpt> BjornT, I included a suggestion in the bug description -- give the watch a status menu with two values, "Automatic" and "Not a Bug Here"
[11:01] <Kamion> stub: thanks :)
[11:05] <BjornT> mpt: oh. i thought the description was obselete, since it talks about bug watches being tied one-to-one to the software it's watching. "Not a Bug Here" sounds strange to have on the bug watch edit page, since it's not obvious what 'Here' means.
[11:07] <mpt> BjornT, that wouldn't be on a separate page, it would be "inside" the Affects row associated with the bug watch.
[11:08] <mpt> Anyway, it's past 10pm and I'm starving, tchau
[11:09] <BjornT> mpt: so you are talking about the *bugtask* edit page? i implemented that once, but kiko rejected it. also, bug watches don't have to be linked to a bugtask.
[11:10] <sabdfl> mpt: could we make Fix Released (a) green and (b) not wrap, on all bug listing pages including the milestone page, please?
[11:11] <sabdfl> https://launchpad.net/malone/bugtrackers/sf
[11:11] <sabdfl> no need for date-and-time
[11:11] <sabdfl> also, none of those statuses are displayed
[11:11] <sabdfl> either a bug, or we should remove the column
[11:11] <sabdfl> that way, fewer lines would wrap
[11:14] <BjornT> sabdfl: the status isn't displayed because we haven't implemented syncing of sf bug watches yet, for bugzilla bugs the correct status is shown.
[11:15] <sabdfl> BjornT: we don't do ANY sync'ing from SF?
[11:17] <jamesh> we could do it by screenscraping individual bug pages
[11:18] <jamesh> which is inefficient, but not a problem if we've only got 40 of them
[11:18] <BjornT> sabdfl: not yet. it's not that easy to do, since SF doesn't provide a good interface for querying the bug status. but i should dedicate some time in implementing proper status syncing of all the bugtrackers we support.
[11:18] <BjornT> jamesh: or maybe you would have some time to look into that?
[11:18] <jamesh> BjornT: I suppose so.  Not in the next week or so though
[11:19] <jamesh> we'd need to put delays between page loads though
[11:20] <jamesh> SF.net blocks your IP address if you scrape them too quickly
[11:21] <BjornT> jamesh: yeah, putting delays also complicates the implementation a bit, but hopefully not too much.
[11:40] <Ubugtu> New bug: #66523 in malone "Date created isn't needed when listing bug watches for a bug tracker" [Medium,Confirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/66523
[11:45] <Ubugtu> New bug: #66524 in malone "Bug status name wrapping and colorisation" [High,Confirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/66524
[12:05] <BjornT> jamesh: i filed a bug about the SF bug syncing and assigned it to you. make sure to update the status of the bug if you start on it, since i might re-assign the bug to me if i'll find time to fix it.
[12:15] <Ubugtu> New bug: #66529 in malone "Sync the status of SourceForge bugs" [Medium,Confirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/66529
[12:28] <carlos> stub: hi, how much time did the translation copy took?
[12:29] <stub> Your asking me? You told me it would take half an hour I thought!
[12:29] <stub> It had to be killed after some time (don't know exactly how long) due to other database problems that needed sorting.
[12:29] <stub> Rescheduled for tomorrow 02:30 UTC
[12:30] <stub> (hopefully it will finish in the one hour downtime window. I think we should do a test on the language pack db if that won't affect things).
[12:31] <carlos> stub: I see, I was asking to know the real time it needs...
[12:32] <carlos> I try to execute it in carbon to get an estimation 
[12:32] <carlos>  /s/I/I will/
[12:34] <jordi> carlos: but it will be like zillion times faster in production right?
[12:34] <carlos> I don't know... carbon is supposed to be a backup server
[12:35] <carlos> and it's quite fast
[12:35] <Ubugtu> New bug: #64231 in update-manager "update-manager doesn't work" [Undecided,Needs info]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/64231
[01:09] <stub> jordi: carbon is identical to the production server. If anything it will be faster because it is less loaded.
[01:13] <jordi> stub: oh cool
[01:26] <stub> carlos: Let me know how long the test run goes. If it goes more than an hour mdz will need to know.
[01:33] <carlos> stub: ok
[01:34] <stub> ta
[01:38] <lifeless> kiko: mark says to ask you
[01:39] <lifeless> something, I'm not sure what... anyhow, he says +10!
[01:39] <salgado> stub, around?
[02:10] <Ubugtu> New bug: #66540 in malone "Bug watches via URL dont distinguish HTTPS" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/66540
[02:18] <carlos> later!!
[02:42] <Fujitsu> Hi... I got OOPS-290C258 when attempting to access https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/47848... Can somebody please have a look at that?
[02:42] <Ubugtu> https://devpad.canonical.com/~jamesh/oops.cgi/290C258
[02:44] <bradb> Fujitsu: looking into it now
[02:44] <Fujitsu> Thanks, bradb.
[02:45] <Fujitsu> bradb, looks to happen for bugs with large numbers of dupes.
[02:46] <Kamion> I was about to say that, yes
[02:46] <Kamion> 47848 is probably one of the most-duped bugs in Malone
[02:46] <Fujitsu> Kamion, exactly. I went to look at it after somebody wondered aloud about it in -motu.
[02:46] <bradb> Some changes to dupe subscriptions just got rolled out, so that may be it.
[02:47] <ajmitch> we were looking for the bug with the most duplicates :)
[02:47] <Fujitsu> #47046 (non-reformatted partitions causing Ubiquity to explode) also suffers from it, and it has a million dupes.
[02:53] <Kamion> looking at the oops, I think it might be more about bugs with large numbers of subscribers, although I'm no expert at reading Launchpad oopses
[02:53] <Kamion> or somewhere in between, perhaps
[02:54] <bradb> Kamion: might be that the new code is doing too many queries figuring out who is subscribed from dupe bugs.
[03:15] <Ubugtu> New bug: #66552 in launchpad ""Please fix the problems below and try again." occurs when filing bug in ubuntu with package field non-empty and invalid" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/66552
[03:17] <kiko> morning
[03:17] <kiko> back in black
[03:17] <fouadbajwa> hi, who should i post a feature request to for launchpad?
[03:18] <kiko> fouadbajwa, to launchpad-users, to the spec tracker, or to the bug tracker, depending.
[03:18] <fouadbajwa> okay
[03:45] <Ubugtu> New bug: #66562 in malone "BugSubscriberPortletView.getSubscribersFromDupes seems to cause timeouts" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/66562
[03:59] <danilos> who carlos
[03:59] <danilos> ok, he is not here ;)
[04:10] <Ubugtu> New bug: #66567 in malone "tag-restricted bug list browsing" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/66567
[04:32] <indu> kiko: hi, how  r u
[04:33] <SteveA> hello
[04:34] <indu> kiko: I want to register our Linux distro in launchpad distros list
[04:39] <indu> can some please give me kiko's email id
[04:40] <kiko> hello indu 
[04:40] <kiko> indu, I haven't replied to your email yet but I will do so today
[04:40] <kiko> sorry for the delay
[04:41] <indu> kiko: its ok, I am searching for your mail id
[04:41] <kiko> kiko@canonical.com
[04:41] <indu> kiko: I want to register our distro "BOSS" in the launchpad site
[04:41] <indu> kiko: ok
[04:42] <indu> kiko: can u please forward me the details for registration
[04:42] <kiko> indu, I'll email you about this.
[04:42] <indu> kiko: ok thankyou
[04:42] <indu> kiko: shall i mail u about this, so that u can reply me or else u will mail me
[04:43] <kiko> I have your email here already
[04:44] <indu> kiko: ok then will be waiting for you mail
[04:44] <indu> kiko: ok I am leaving, will be back tomorrow morning
[04:44] <indu> kiko: good day :-) , Bye
[04:50] <Ubugtu> New bug: #66570 in malone "Branch vocabulary search is restricted to context product" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/66570
[05:00] <Ubugtu> New bug: #66572 in malone "subscription behaves strangely when duplicates exist" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/66572
[05:10] <_thumper_> am I back or is it lying?
[05:35] <SteveA> hi _thumper_ 
[05:36] <_thumper_> hey SteveA
[05:36] <_thumper_> I got hit by a hardware failure at the exchange
[05:36] <_thumper_> bt engineers have swapped out a card
[05:36] <_thumper_> and it seems like things are ok again, connection wise
[05:39] <sivang> hi folks, how do I change a team's name ?
[05:39] <sivang> (I am the admin on this team, there is another owner)
[05:45] <salgado> sivang, launchpad.net/people/<team-name>/+edit
[05:46] <sivang> thanks salgado 
[05:49] <sivang> salgado: OOPS-290C385
[05:49] <Ubugtu> https://devpad.canonical.com/~jamesh/oops.cgi/290C385
[05:49] <sivang> salgado: on the change name and title action
[05:50] <SteveA> flacoste: ping
[05:51] <flacoste> SteveA: pong
[05:51] <SteveA> flacoste: I'm on the hook to do a largeish code review for you
[05:51] <SteveA> we didn't have a pre-implementation call, and I'm not up to speed with recent work in this area.  So I'd like to have a voice call with you before I do the review.
[05:52] <SteveA> Alternatively, a reviewer more familiar with the area can do the review.
[05:52] <flacoste> SteveA: yep, I saw
[05:53] <flacoste> SteveA: i'm available for a voice-call if you like
[05:54] <SteveA> ok, can we do the call in 1 hour from now?
[05:55] <flacoste> SteveA: ok, VoIP or real phone?
[06:01] <Ubugtu> New bug: #66583 in blueprint "Cannot add a dependency on a spec in a different product" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/66583
[06:04] <SteveA> flacoste: skype please
[06:05] <flacoste> SteveA: i never setup skype
[06:05] <flacoste> SteveA: i can give it a try though
[06:08] <SteveA> please do
[06:16] <SteveA> sivang: try again please
[06:16] <sivang> SteveA: btw, have you checked out the gizmo project?
[06:17] <sivang> SteveA: http://www.gizmoproject.com/ , seem sto be better then skype, and I think it all free
[06:18] <sivang> SteveA: thanks! it worked this time.
[06:18] <SteveA> thanks sivang 
[06:19] <sivang> SteveA: setup is also so painless
[06:19] <SteveA> should try it sometime, thanks
[06:20] <sivang> you're welcome.
[06:33] <Keybuk> IntegrityError
[06:33] <Keybuk> A server error occurred. 
[06:33] <Keybuk> -- 
[06:33] <Keybuk> that's bad, right?
[06:34] <ddaa> That merely means that form you just posted did not properly check input validity, and the input was caught by a database constraint.
[06:35] <ddaa> This sort of oops are usually fairly simple to fix. Thanks for exercising the bug, the error is logged, matsubara will file the appropriate bug if needed.
[06:36] <Keybuk> ok, I'll nag him when he gets back from lunch
[06:36] <Keybuk> we kinda need to be able to deal with UDS-MTV specs ;)
[06:36] <ddaa> well, matsubara does not fix most bugs
[06:36] <ddaa> he just file the u
[06:36] <ddaa> file the bugs from the oops reports
[06:36] <Keybuk> doesn't he fix the spec tracker?
[06:36] <Keybuk> he did the last patch
[06:37] <ddaa> *shrug* I'm bit at a loss on who's owning the spec tracker...
[06:37] <ddaa> AFAIK, the main developer of the spec tracker is sabdfl...
[06:37] <geser> hello, can somebody please fix the outdated Contents files on archive.u.c for edgy?
[06:45] <Ubugtu> New bug: #66586 in blueprint "Cannot accept or decline proposed specifications" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/66586
[08:09] <SteveA> flacoste: ping
[08:09] <flacoste> SteveA: pong
[08:13] <SteveA> hmm... just a moment.  I had a hard hang.
[08:13] <geser> can somebody please fix the outdated Contents files on archive.u.c for edgy?
[08:18] <SteveA> malcc / cprov: ^^^ ?
[08:19] <SteveA> flacoste: trying to call you
[08:19] <malcc> geser: Hopefully we'll run this tonight
[08:19] <geser> thanks
[08:19] <flacoste> SteveA: I missed your call...
[08:21] <SteveA> calling again
[09:13] <Ng> doh, I wanted to talk to matt
[09:13] <Ng> come back!
[09:35] <seb128> danilo_: do you work on template imports for rosetta too?
[09:44] <danilo_> seb128: I can help if it's needed, though it's not been in my high priority list
[09:44] <seb128> danilo_: I would like to get gnome-app-install template accepted to it can be correctly translated for edgy
[09:44] <seb128> danilos: language pack have to be rolled on friday, and I want to let some time to translators
[09:44] <seb128> template was not built for some time
[09:44] <danilos> seb128: ok, I'll see to it right now
[09:44] <seb128> and we get no feedback in such case :/
[09:45] <seb128> we just noticed the issue yesterday
[09:45] <seb128> thank you
[09:45] <seb128> danilos: and do you remember the URI magic to make rosetta display > 10 strings on a page? browsing 35 pages to find a string is getting on my nerves :p
[09:46] <danilos> seb128: just change the batch size, but it can easily timeout if you try too much
[09:46] <seb128> 'just'
[09:46] <seb128> I'm asking for how to change it
[09:47] <seb128> ?batch=<number>?
[09:47] <danilos> seb128: btw, you can also download PO file and look for a string that way (that's what translators have been doing for a while already)
[09:47] <seb128> I know
[09:47] <seb128> I just want to fix that string and jump to next bug
[09:47] <seb128> other way I've to wait for the mail to be sent to my debian email
[09:47] <seb128> and with the fast Debian servers it can take some time :p
[09:48] <danilos> seb128: btw, I don't see gnome-app-install template among needs review templates
[09:48] <seb128> it was this morning
[09:48] <danilos> ok, let me check approved and failed queues
[09:48] <seb128> https://launchpad.net/rosetta/imports?target=all&status=NEEDS_REVIEW&type=pot
[09:48] <danilos> oh, it's there, I just missed it
[09:49] <seb128>   	 po/gnome-app-install.pot in gnome-app-install in Ubuntu Edgy   	Needs Review  	
[09:49] <seb128> Uploaded by Rosetta Administrators on 2006-10-16 18:03:04 UTC
[09:49] <seb128> Will be imported into Template "gnome-app-install" in Ubuntu Edgy package "gnome-app-install"
[09:49] <seb128> 
[09:49] <seb128> k
[09:51] <seb128> danilos: I found my string, thanks for the batch hint ;)
[09:51] <danilos> seb128: np (btw, I didn't answer that; you could see the URL parameters by going to the second page ;)
[09:52] <seb128> danilos: no, just the start parameter, not the batch one
[09:52] <danilos> ah, it was there before ;)
[09:52] <danilos> anyway, I approved the gnome-app-install.pot, it should start importing with the next poimport run (every 10 minutes)
[09:53] <seb128> that was too easy to change probably :p
[09:53] <seb128> danilos: rock on, thank you!
[09:53] <danilos> yeah, we had a lot of timeouts because of that ;)
[10:10] <SteveA> flacoste: ping -- reviewed
[10:10] <flacoste> SteveA: already?
[10:10] <SteveA> flacoste: if you can get an answer within the next 1hr, I'll deal with it tonight
[10:10] <SteveA> the review was not so long
[10:10] <SteveA> you wrote the code and tests clearly in general
[10:10] <flacoste> SteveA: nice, i'm on it
[10:10] <SteveA> so there was little PEP-8 nit-picking
[10:11] <SteveA> but also, you did lots of random whitespace removal
[10:11] <SteveA> I found that distracting, and it inflated the apparent size of the diff
[10:11] <flacoste> SteveA: yeah, my editor does it for every file I save...
[10:11] <SteveA> so, please dont' do that in future
[10:11] <SteveA> or, save it, and commit that as a whitespace cleanup
[10:11] <SteveA> separately
[10:12] <flacoste> SteveA: I will try the separate whitespace commit approach
[10:12] <matthewrevell> SteveA: Got time for a quick question?
[10:14] <SteveA> matthewrevell: yes
[10:15] <matthewrevell> SteveA: Is Launchpad ever likely to provide projects with install-package hosting, much like Sourceforge? From what I've read, I think it's unlikely.
[10:15] <matthewrevell> Thought I'd check though
[10:16] <SteveA> what do you mean by "install-package hosting" ?
[10:16] <matthewrevell> Sorry, that wasn't particularly clear. I mean web space where projects can host packages for end users to download and install.
[10:18] <kiko> matthewrevell, "packages"? as in "soyuz-built binary packages"? or as in "random blobs"?
[10:19] <flacoste> SteveA: two questions
[10:20] <flacoste> 1) I fold back ITicketActor in IPerson? I think yes is the answer, but just want to be sure
[10:20] <matsubara> any reviewer available to review a 150 lines patch that's blocking the distro guys?
[10:20] <matthewrevell> kiko: I'm thinking along the lines of what Sourceforge offers. For example: imagine Gaim used Launchpad. Could there ever be a point where Gaim might send their Windows users, for example, to Launchpad.net/Gaim/Download to get the latest install-gaim.exe?
[10:21] <flacoste> 2) about the use of **kwargs, it is to make it easier to track the ITicketTarget.searchTickets signature
[10:22] <flacoste> the database classes (implementing that interface) delegates the implementation to a common class which lists the parameters explicitely
[10:22] <kiko> matthewrevell, you meant "random blobs" then. the answer is that we have no functionality planned for that, though it would be trivial to set up a basic system that offered downloads and people can already crib that by using bug attachments
[10:22] <flacoste> so, adding a new search parameter doesn't require updating the intermediary signature
[10:23] <matthewrevell> kiko: Okay, thanks.
[10:36] <MagicFab> hi
[10:36] <MagicFab> it seems someone has created a Colombia  team on LP, except it's not anyone in the current Loco team.
[10:37] <MagicFab> Its members seem to be dummy/empt accounts.
[10:37] <MagicFab> How can we address that ?
[10:39] <kiko> MagicFab, well... is the issue the name of the team?
[10:42] <MagicFab> yes, as I was planning to use LP to coordinate some team work
[10:43] <MagicFab> another issue, I just tried to register a "quebec" team and I get an error message
[10:43] <MagicFab> : Sorry, something just went wrong in Launchpad. Weve recorded what happened, and well fix it as soon as possible. Apologies for the inconvenience. If this is blocking your work, let us know on the launchpad-users mailing list (requires subscription). Include the error ID OOPS-290A574 in your message."
[10:43] <Ubugtu> https://devpad.canonical.com/~jamesh/oops.cgi/290A574
[10:44] <MagicFab> ah..
[10:44] <MagicFab> uh, password protected...
[10:50] <MagicFab> so anyways... I have to run, but would like to know how the Colombia team could use LP without the confusion of this (seemingly) empty, inactive team with the same name.
[10:50] <MagicFab> later :)
[10:52] <looksaus> how am I supposed to use the "roadmap" feature in launchpad functional specs?
[10:59] <matsubara> MagicFab_brb_l8r: you just found a brand new bug. Congratulations! :)
[11:02] <ddaa> Now that we got the exception count low, maybe we can resurrect the idea of oops karma? ;)
[11:02] <ddaa> Every time you find a new oops, you get karma, yay!
[11:03] <ddaa> (just in case somebody misunderstood me, I'm joking)
[11:15] <Ubugtu> New bug: #66622 in launchpad "Register a team with an email address crashes." [Medium,Confirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/66622
[12:10] <Ubugtu> New bug: #66631 in soyuz "please remove warty from the archive" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/66631
[12:14] <lifeless> mpt: why doesn't launhcpads product registration *ask* me about translations and bug reporting, in an optional couple of check boxen
[12:14] <kiko> yeah, good question
[12:14] <lifeless> I just had a subunit user ask me 'you said to use malone, but its not configured to'