=== doko_ [n=doko@dslb-088-073-069-095.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-java | ||
=== peeps [n=peeps@cpe-70-112-25-110.austin.res.rr.com] has joined #ubuntu-java | ||
=== nikk [n=niccolo@host223-253-dynamic.8-87-r.retail.telecomitalia.it] has joined #ubuntu-java | ||
nikk | hi to all!! someone knows a wrapper for java under linux?? | 01:19 |
---|---|---|
=== pombred1 is now known as pombreda | ||
=== pombred1 [n=pombreda@c-71-198-188-62.hsd1.ca.comcast.net] has joined #ubuntu-java | ||
=== tmarble [n=tmarble@64.73.245.242] has joined #ubuntu-java | ||
doko | tashiro: swt still broken on amd64 :/ | 05:44 |
=== tashiro_ [n=stephan@e180152059.adsl.alicedsl.de] has joined #ubuntu-java | ||
doko | tashiro_: ping | 07:04 |
=== pombreda [n=pombreda@dsl017-042-217.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net] has joined #ubuntu-java | ||
=== tashiro [n=stephan@e180152059.adsl.alicedsl.de] has joined #ubuntu-java | ||
=== vil [n=vladimir@catv-tisnov-86.selfnet.cz] has joined #ubuntu-java | ||
vil | hi tashiro, I have question regarding your lost bioclipse package | 08:31 |
tashiro | Hi vil | 08:31 |
vil | it depends on the eclipse.core. so how did you package? as a plugin for the standard eclipse right next to the JDT and others? | 08:32 |
tashiro | What? The org.eclipse.core plugins are in eclipse-platform | 08:35 |
vil | and also I want to congratulate you guys, today I updated Eclipse in my Edgy and so far it works perfect! | 08:35 |
tashiro | Uhh ha. doko was able to upload it ? | 08:36 |
tashiro | I hope that it's too buggy | 08:37 |
vil | did you put the bioclipse plugins to /usr/lib/eclipse/plugins? which would mean that you could use bioclipse from within eclipse. or did you make a standalone application? | 08:37 |
tashiro | For bioclipse you can see how I tried to package EMF in eclipse-emf | 08:37 |
vil | I am looking at eclipse-emf right now | 08:38 |
tashiro | Hmm, yes. We havn't talk much about rcp clients yet | 08:38 |
tashiro | I would use /usr/lib/bioclipse/{features,plugins} and use a separate install site /usr/lib/eclipse | 08:39 |
vil | this way it would still be available in full eclipse. I mean that it does not make much sense to be able to switch from bioclipse to java. | 08:42 |
tashiro | With a similar file like /usr/lib/eclipse/links/local.link | 08:42 |
vil | what do you think about it? | 08:46 |
tashiro | Hmm, I don't. It has pros and cons to put the bioclipse plugins in /usr/lib/eclipse | 08:47 |
vil | would you consider it better to have the option to switch? I am interrested in the pros, because I do not know bioclipse very much. | 08:50 |
tashiro | The pro is that you can use Bioclipse's plugins in your Workbench. The con is that you have more unnecessary plugins in Eclipse | 08:52 |
tashiro | I think the cons outweigh the pros | 08:53 |
tashiro | SO, as I said I would use /usr/lib/bioclipse with a link(not a fs link) to /usr/lib/eclipse | 08:54 |
vil | for me it would be more confortable to have it standalone, but this is just my opinion. | 08:55 |
tashiro | Yes, it's standalone | 08:56 |
tashiro | But to copy existing plugins is a preferred option. | 08:56 |
vil | what exactly does this /usr/lib/eclipse/link do? | 08:58 |
tashiro | It's used by the OSGi framework to specify an additional location where plug-ins can exist | 08:59 |
vil | ok, so far for my theoretical lessons, now I should do some real work ;) see you after some months (hopefully not) | 09:01 |
tashiro | months? | 09:01 |
tashiro | What do you plan to do? | 09:02 |
vil | just kidding. but it does not seem very easy to package it. | 09:02 |
tashiro | No, definitely not | 09:02 |
vil | btw. were you able to spawn Help Contents in the newly packaged Eclipse? it works using sun's java but not with gcj. | 09:03 |
tashiro | No, I hadn't time yet to look into that issue. And overholt doesn't know anything about it. | 09:04 |
vil | ok | 09:05 |
tashiro | vil: I just found following interesting documentation : http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/library/os-ecl-manage/ | 09:16 |
vil | thanks, seems interresting | 09:22 |
doko | tashiro: doesn't work on amd64 :-/ | 09:41 |
tashiro | doko: What doesn't work. The problem with TomcatApserver and GCJ? | 09:43 |
doko | swt-gtk | 09:43 |
doko | Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: memmove | 09:44 |
doko | at org.eclipse.swt.internal.gtk.OS.memmove(org.eclipse.swt.gtk.linux.x86_64_3.2.1.v3235.jar.so) | 09:44 |
doko | at org.eclipse.swt.internal.Converter.wcsToMbcs(org.eclipse.swt.gtk.linux.x86_64_3.2.1.v3235.jar.so) | 09:44 |
doko | at org.eclipse.swt.internal.Converter.wcsToMbcs(org.eclipse.swt.gtk.linux.x86_64_3.2.1.v3235.jar.so) | 09:44 |
doko | at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.<clinit>(org.eclipse.swt.gtk.linux.x86_64_3.2.1.v3235.jar.so) | 09:44 |
doko | at java.lang.Class.initializeClass(libgcj.so.70) | 09:44 |
doko | google for java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError org.eclipse.swt.internal.gtk.OS.memmove ... | 09:45 |
tashiro | I saw that we also disabled the swttools patch, which is necessary AFAIK for 64bit platforms | 09:46 |
=== vil [n=vladimir@catv-tisnov-86.selfnet.cz] has joined #ubuntu-java | ||
tashiro | doko: I will try to convert the latest patches from the Fedora Repo in the next time and hope we can such things | 09:50 |
doko | tashiro: that would be great | 09:52 |
tashiro | doko: I got a different error with Azureus: http://rafb.net/paste/results/sO21vy75.html | 09:54 |
doko | tashiro LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/jni azureus | 09:57 |
=== vil [n=vladimir@catv-tisnov-86.selfnet.cz] has left #ubuntu-java [] | ||
=== vil [n=vladimir@catv-tisnov-86.selfnet.cz] has joined #ubuntu-java | ||
vil | doko: do you know anything about org.eclipse.resources.linux? | 11:03 |
doko | vil: no | 11:07 |
vil | doko: never mind, good night | 11:11 |
doko | good night :) | 11:18 |
=== vil [n=vladimir@catv-tisnov-86.selfnet.cz] has left #ubuntu-java [] | ||
=== marcin_ant [n=marcin@194.114.146.126] has joined #ubuntu-java |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!