[01:04] <lophyte> Burgwork: opensync has evo plugins
[01:05] <lophyte> opensync-plugin-evolution - Evolution plugin for opensync
[01:05] <Burgwork> exciting
[01:05] <Burgwork> we shoudl probably use opensysc
[01:05] <lophyte> it is :)
[01:05] <ajmitch> yes, we should
[01:06] <ajmitch> the debian maintainers are nice & friendly too
[01:06] <lophyte> maybe I'll give it a shot
[01:06] <Burgwork> ajmitch: are you a debian maintainer of opensync?
[01:06] <Burgwork> kde is moving towards it
[01:06] <ajmitch> Burgwork: mainly lifeless & azeem
[01:06] <Burgwork> ah, good people then
[01:07] <ajmitch> yep
[01:08] <ajmitch> I'm still in the LP team but haven't done much
[01:11] <lophyte> arr.. suppose I'll have to use the CLI tools
[01:11] <ajmitch> http://packages.qa.debian.org/libo/libopensync-plugin-evolution2.html
[01:11] <ajmitch> funny, I'm still listed as comaintainer
[01:12] <ajmitch> I should merge it in feisty if lifeless doesn't get to it first
[01:13] <lophyte> is it even usable o_o
[01:14] <ajmitch> ought to be
[01:14] <lophyte> all I get from opensyncutils package is
[01:14] <lophyte> osyncbinary  osyncdump    osyncplugin  osyncstress  osynctest
[01:19] <lophyte> yay, unmet deps
[01:19] <lophyte> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
[01:19] <lophyte>   libmultisync-plugin-palm: Depends: libpisock8 but it is not installable
[01:20] <Fujitsu> lophyte: multisync got obliterated from testing a while ago because it's no longer installable. Needs changes to work with pisock9.
[01:20] <lophyte> ah.
[01:20] <lophyte> guess I'm screwed then
[08:19] <ajmitch> hi Burgundavia
[08:20] <Burgundavia> hey ajmitch
[09:11] <siretart> wasabi_: nice  work on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/NetworkAuthentication/Client
[09:12] <ajmitch> hey siretart
[09:26] <siretart> huhu ajmitch
[02:57] <SimonAnibal> ahhhhh....coffee.....
[02:57] <SimonAnibal> good morning all
[03:17] <^robertj> howdy
[05:07] <cberlo> would this be the right place to ask about a samba acl issue with Ubuntu?
[05:11] <cberlo> Okay, let's put this out there anyway, and if you want to reply, thanks.  If not, oh well.  :)      I have a server that's mounting Windows user home drives to one share.  I'd like to create links for each user that logs in to their own "home drive" and give appropriate permissions.  I do not want other users to be able to have any access to other Windows home drives.  Can anyone suggest a way to go about doing this without having to mount ev
[08:00] <ajmitch> morning
[08:00] <tmh__> win 10
[08:06] <bmonty> hi ajmitch
[08:17] <Burgwork> woot!
[08:17] <Burgwork> work just got me a 19" monitor
[08:17] <bmonty> nice
[08:18] <bmonty> I just finished packaging the new version of gq (1.2.1)
[08:20] <Burgwork> cool
[08:20] <SimonAnibal> work just got me...more stuff to do!
[08:21] <Burgwork> can you do the new lat as well?
[08:22] <ajmitch> what is the latest version of lat?
[08:22] <bmonty> 1.2.1.1
[08:22] <bmonty> we have 1.0.7-1
[08:22] <ajmitch> debian has 1.2.0.1
[08:22] <ajmitch> do we need to fork from debian for yet more packages?
[08:23] <bmonty> i've never used lat
[08:23] <ajmitch> it's a mono package
[08:23] <bmonty> the screenshots look nice though
[08:25] <bmonty> does it work better than gq?
[08:27] <Burgwork> somewhat
[08:27] <Burgwork> UI is nicer, but have had a few crashing issues
[08:27] <Burgwork> 1.2.1 is latest stable
[08:27] <Burgwork> 1.3.0 is latest unstable
[08:27] <Burgwork> lat follows GNOME numbering scheme
[08:27] <ajmitch> debian should get 1.2.1 soon
[08:28] <Burgwork> lat is proposed for gnome-admin upstream
[08:29] <ajmitch> and the hordes of users will scream at more mono stuff being added
[08:30] <Burgwork> well, other people proposed gq in its place
[08:30] <Burgwork> radio silence since then
[08:31] <whiprush> ajmitch: confirmed the hotel
[08:31] <ajmitch> yay
[08:31] <whiprush> also added your name to the room, so you'll need id. (obviously)
[08:31] <ajmitch> well I'll obviously have my passport :)
[08:32] <whiprush> I am currently looking at how to walk there from the hotel
[08:32] <whiprush> which looks long and out of the way
[08:32] <whiprush> but still not too bad
[08:32] <ajmitch> to google?
[08:32] <whiprush> yeah
[08:33] <whiprush> moffett south to middlefield, then to shoreline, then left on charleston
[08:33] <ajmitch> pretty roundabout way to do it
[08:33] <whiprush> yeah
[08:33] <whiprush> I can't see a way to cross the 101 though
[08:33] <whiprush> and directly north is like a nasa facility.
[08:34] <whiprush> but, if you were planning on walking around and stuff when you get there, scouting out that way might work
[08:34] <ajmitch> moffett goes over 101 right by the hotel, if there's a footpath
[08:34] <whiprush> :)
[08:34] <whiprush> yeah
[08:34] <whiprush> that was my concern, a footpath
[08:34] <ajmitch> otherwise just run across 8 lanes of traffic, it'll be fine
[08:34] <ajmitch> get your exercise for the morning
[08:35] <bmonty> ajmitch: last time I was there I almost got a ticket for running across of the roads
[08:35] <bmonty> cops seem serious about jaywalking there
[08:35] <ajmitch> it looks like there's a footpath on moffett as it goes over
[08:35] <ajmitch> we'll find out on saturday
[08:36] <ajmitch> hard to tell
[08:36] <whiprush> "Hi everyone, well me made it, except for jorge, he won't be making the trip, he got killed on the highway .... well, let's get to work!"
[08:36] <ajmitch> heh
[08:41] <whiprush> I can't wait for this
[08:41] <whiprush> I haven't seen you guys in like 2 years.
[08:50] <ajmitch> not since sydney
[11:11] <Burgwork> we have had ~15 subscriptions to our mailgn list in 2 days
[11:14] <stelis> Burgwork: Is there a easy way to ping all the Ubuntu Directory team?
[11:14] <Burgwork> via our mailing list
[11:14] <stelis> There were 41 members listed on there this morning
[11:14] <stelis> So most probably aren't on the ML yet
[11:15] <Burgwork> likely
[11:15] <stelis> I didn't know that the ML was up until well, 30 seconds ago
[11:17] <ajmitch> I wonder how many team members are going to be inactive & just want to see stuff happen
[11:17] <Burgwork> yep
[11:17] <Burgwork> we need a good todo
[11:18] <Burgwork> who has a few cycles right now?
[11:19] <stelis> FWIW, I've been waiting on MV
[11:19] <Burgwork> creating a todo list now is good thing
[11:20] <stelis> Since I don't know what UDS *is* yet, software-wise
[11:20] <stelis> If that makes ssense
[11:20] <Burgwork> I am speaking todo for the whole team
[11:20] <Burgwork> then our todo is: evaluate fds vs openldap
[11:20] <stelis> OK.
[11:21] <stelis> I was puzzled by J Haltom saying that UDS would be directory independent
[11:21] <stelis> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-directory/2006-October/000002.html
[11:23] <stelis> ogra also talked about using smbldap on edubuntu-devel
[11:23] <stelis> Would it be worth calling a pre-MV meeting?
[11:24] <ajmitch> you've got about 2 days to do so
[11:25] <stelis> ajmitch: probably too late then
[11:25] <ajmitch> well MV starts on sunday, and people will be travelling
[11:25] <stelis> Yep
[11:25] <ajmitch> I'm only around for the next 2 days before I fly away
[11:25] <stelis> Should have double-checked the date
[11:26] <stelis> I just get the sense that we may have different people thinking of going in different directions
[11:26] <ajmitch> possibly
[11:27] <ajmitch> some of us will get together in MV & argue it out
[11:27] <ajmitch> input from the lists, etc is welcome
[11:27] <stelis> My two cents was really in the spec
[11:28] <ajmitch> ok
[11:28] <stelis> I think that the most important thing is that third party devs have one product to target
[11:28] <Burgwork> yes, that is a clear target
[11:29] <stelis> The other thing I'd like is one record for each host
[11:29] <Burgwork> add it to the spec
[11:29] <stelis> OK