[01:04] <ogra> LaserJock, any news on the tux* front ?
[01:05] <LaserJock> ah, not yet
[01:05] <LaserJock> I'll work on that some tonight
[01:05] <LaserJock> got a lot of MOTU and work stuff to do as well today
[01:06] <ogra> oki, i'll start on some now, gcompris is done ....
[01:06] <LaserJock> darn, you're too fast :/
[01:06] <ogra> heh, i have to use the awesome fast bandwih as much as i can here ;)
[01:07] <ogra> i'll be travelling next week so i try to get the merges done this week if i can ...
[01:08] <LaserJock> oh ok
[01:08] <LaserJock> I thought you were waiting
[02:18] <LaserJock> ogra: you still around?
[02:54] <ogra> we're just wrapping up
[02:56] <LaserJock> ogra: I just had a quick question about the tuxpain merge
[02:56] <LaserJock> there are a lot of pot changes in the previous Ubuntu version
[02:56] <ogra> :)
[02:56] <LaserJock> heh, tuxpaint :-)
[02:57] <LaserJock> I don't see a mention of that anywhere in the changelog so I wondered if that was intentional (something to do with langpacks)
[03:02] <ogra> hmm, mom didnt pick them up
[03:03] <LaserJock> well, MoM merged them in
[03:03] <LaserJock> I was just wondering where they came from
[03:03] <ogra> wonderful
[03:03] <ogra> probably rosetta
[03:03] <LaserJock> so we keep them?
[03:03] <ogra> just use the mom package  ... 
[03:04] <ogra> she's usually right
[03:04] <ogra> we can drop them later if they cause any problem (which i dont belive)
[03:04] <LaserJock> well, they existed in the Edgy package so assume they are ok
[03:07] <LaserJock> ogra: ok, you'll have a debdiff in your mailbox shortly, unless you want me to put in in a bug report
[03:12] <ogra> debdiff is fine :)
[04:04] <sbalneav> ogra: ping, about?
[04:04] <sbalneav> Does ubuntu have inotify?
[04:16] <whiprush> sbalneav: yes.
[04:17] <whiprush> sbalneav: I want to say since 2.6.13 but I might be off on that.
[04:25] <sbalneav> I am programming inotify stuff as we speak.
[04:25] <sbalneav> We'll see if it works. :)
[04:28] <Burgundavia> sbalneav: ok, you rock
[04:29] <Burgundavia> I wish our (Userfuls) platform had sane people like you working on it
[04:45] <sbalneav> Hmm, appears I need to READ from the file after the select()'s returned :)
[04:45] <sbalneav> However, inotify works. :)
[04:46] <ajmitch> hi
[04:46] <sbalneav> Hello ajmitch
[04:53] <LaserJock> yay, got 1 reviewer on the menu spec
[04:54] <LaserJock> to bad I had a stupid incomplete sentence :/
[03:45] <bddebian> Heya
[03:47] <bddebian> Heh, Hi Kamping_Kaiser
[03:47] <Kamping_Kaiser> :)
[03:50] <sbalneav> Morning all
[03:51] <Kamping_Kaiser> hi :)
[03:55] <bddebian> Heya sbalneav
[03:56] <sbalneav> Hello bddebian
[05:48] <stgraber> hi
[06:57] <wasabi> ogra: I'd like to report: OpenAFS rocks now. It is a very good solution and a very appropiate replcaement for NFS. It doesn't do disconnected operation yet though (in progress), but our unison idea still applies, and is now easier with afs.  Unison sync from /afs/$realm/home/$uid to > /local/home.
[07:16] <Burgwork> wasabi: I am having major headaches from NFS, so that is good news
[07:16] <wasabi> AFS sort of requires Krb5 now too.
[07:42] <ogra> wasabi, doesnt AFS require multiple servers ?
[07:43] <wasabi> Nope.
[07:45] <wasabi> It allows multiple servers, and does replicas.
[07:45] <wasabi> I'm configuring it up here. 
[07:47] <ogra> we have GFS in the kernel by default anyway ... why not use that ?
[07:49] <wasabi> GFS isn't a networked file system.
[07:49] <wasabi> It's a cluster file system.
[08:33] <robertj> hey all, is there a list anywhere of features that need to be added to EDSAdmin?
[08:35] <juliux> hi RichEd 
[08:41] <RichEd> hi juliux
[08:41] <juliux> RichEd, lwe was great for edubuntu
[08:41] <juliux> RichEd, there were many people from schools
[08:42] <RichEd> great ... you can tell me all about it in person nest week ... we can use that as a "test case" to define a conference report for the country template we will plan
[08:42] <juliux> RichEd, we will have meeting with a school here in germany;)
[08:42] <juliux> RichEd, ok
[08:42] <RichEd> excellent ...
[08:43] <RichEd> jono bacon and I have been having some great chats around community & loco's so what you and I will be prototyping will be reused not only by other education country contacts, but also be generalised for loco teams 
[08:44] <juliux> cooool
[08:44] <juliux> at the moment i try to get the ok from jono that we can show one of the linuxnewmedia awards in germany on the expos;)
[08:49] <pygi> hello everyone
[08:50] <juliux> hi pygi 
[09:30] <pygi> hey ho cbx33 
[09:30] <cbx33> hi pygi 
[09:31] <pygi> sbalneav: you followed -devel about burning stuff? :)
[09:31] <sbalneav> Which? Edubuntu-devel?
[09:31] <pygi> sbalneav: nah, #ubuntu-devel ^_^
[09:32] <pygi> sbalneav: in theory, libburn now has full capacity of cdrecord when regarded cd burning ^_^
[09:32] <sbalneav> Good news!
[09:32] <sbalneav> Congrats!
[09:32] <pygi> -multi, -tao, and all that implemented
[09:32] <pygi> new release in a week or two
[09:33] <pygi> won't hit archives that moment tho, have to make Brasero compatible with it first
[09:36] <pygi> sbalneav: will you require me to do any changes to libburn source so we could do what we need?
[09:36] <pygi> sbalneav: that is apart for iscsi, which is/will be a separate library
[09:37] <sbalneav> Don't know at this point, I've been busy with dealing with merging ssh and xdmcp localdev access, so haven't had much of a chance to look at what will be needed.
[09:38] <pygi> oki, and I guess even that we won't have this in feisty
[10:07] <Elwell> hey folks, is there a netinstall version of edubuntu 6.10?
[10:13] <Burgwork> yes
[10:15] <Elwell> ah, cos a diff of /install/netinstall on the CD looked the same as the normal edgy one
[10:15] <Elwell> (I'm trying to netinstall 2 desktops not do a full LTSP)
[10:31] <Burgwork> right
[11:02] <pygi> hey ogra ^_^