[12:12] <jdong> Seveas: return poke
[12:26] <jdong> crimsun: flash9 is perfect in Edgy, gave the go-ahead for it already... Also testing it on Dapper and appears to work too
[12:27] <jdong> crimsun: is it ok to backport to Dapper also?
[12:27] <jdong> it's a blast :D
[12:27] <jdong> oops wrong window
[12:28] <crimsun> jdong: I ran some rudimentary tests in 6.06.1 and 6.10, and both seemed ok, before I mentioned it to you, so if you're fine with them, I have no further qualms.
[12:28] <jdong> crimsun: what's the default DEBCONF_FRONTEND in Dapper?
[12:28] <jdong> crimsun: in my debootstrapped chroot it defaults to noninteractive which obviously doesn't work :D
[12:29] <jdong> crimsun: hopefully update-manager uses an interactive one by default?
[12:29] <crimsun> I believe it's non-
[12:29] <jdong> :-/
[12:30] <jdong> that's a bit shaky....
[12:30] <crimsun> you could recommend people reconfigure debconf first
[12:31] <jdong> crimsun: true
[12:31] <jdong> crimsun: I expect flash users to have java anyway, which needs an interactive debconf too :D
[12:32] <dsas> jdong: That'd probably be a bad guess.
[12:32] <jdong> :-/
[12:32] <jdong> well... I don't want 200 bug tickets on flashplugin failing on postinst (again)
[12:34] <crimsun> that's easily avoidable if, when you mention the backports being available, you mention that debconf may need to be reconfigured prior
[12:34] <jdong> ok
[12:35] <crimsun> (not that many people will notice such a mention, but...)
[12:36] <jdong> crimsun: well, the UWN should reach a few and I'll also keep forum staff on alert
[12:36] <jdong> hopefully between those two that's enough coverage
[12:44] <crimsun> as long as it's done in blazing, garish letters
[02:25] <_ion> Yay, my system failed to boot after upgrading to feisty. :-) It was simple to fix, though: bug 72387
[02:25] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 72387 in lvm-common "Incorrect dependency in initramfs script, system fails to boot. Patch attached" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/72387
[02:49] <minghua> _ion: you are my hero.  I'll test your patch soon
[09:12] <zOrK> hey, I am doing an easy-ndiswrapper script, is anyone insterested on help me?
[09:14] <highvoltage> zOrK: that's a question for #ubuntu
[09:14] <zOrK> no man,  I am provramming an easy-ndiswrapper program
[09:14] <zOrK> *programming
[09:15] <zOrK> I've read in launchpad.net that they are needing one
[09:15] <highvoltage> zOrK: aah, sorry, misread you there.
[09:15] <zOrK> it's ok
[09:15] <zOrK> highvoltage, does ubuntu recognizes all the wireless cards without even took ndiswrapper?
[09:22] <highvoltage> zOrK: it recognises a large variety of cards, I've used mostly Intel cards (ipw2100, ipw2200, ipw3945) and they all work out the box on ubuntu.
[09:22] <zOrK> ok
[09:23] <zOrK> without use ndiswrapper, right?
[09:23] <highvoltage> yes, without ndiswrapper.
[09:23] <highvoltage> I would never buy hardware that would require ndiswrapper :)
[09:23] <zOrK> thanks.. do you know where can I find a list of wireless cards which are not regoznied by the kernel?
[09:24] <highvoltage> I think there's a page on the ubuntu wiki with a full list, perhaps try a search on that.
[09:25] <highvoltage> zOrK: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/?action=fullsearch&context=180&value=wireless&titlesearch=Titles
[09:25] <zOrK> thanks
[09:25] <highvoltage> zOrK: this looks like what you're looking for: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/WifiDocs/WirelessCardsSupported
[09:26] <zOrK> sweet.
[09:26] <zOrK> thanks
[09:26] <zOrK> would you like to program it with me ?
[09:26] <zOrK> there are not much time
[09:28] <zOrK> Works "out of the box"
[09:28] <zOrK> what does that exactly mean ?
[09:28] <highvoltage> heh, that's my #1 problem as well. your best bet is probably to ping the ubuntu-devel mailing list and make a call for contributions.
[09:29] <highvoltage> zOrK: it means that I install Ubuntu and my card works without me having to touch a config file or install any additional software.
[09:29] <zOrK> ok
[09:29] <zOrK> you've been helpful tonight
[09:29] <zOrK> thanks
[09:29] <highvoltage> :)
[11:31] <mdke_> I can use comments in debian/rules right? with compat 5
[11:34] <mdke_> and while lines are ignored alright?
[11:34] <mdke_> s/while/white
[11:45] <giskard> mdke_, yes, but this is not a feature of debhelper5
[11:46] <mdke_> giskard: so it's a feature of an earlier version?
[11:47] <giskard> mdke_, i guess blank lines and # comments are supported from debhelper0
[11:47] <mdke_> giskard: ah good. Thanks for your help.
[01:33] <pygi> sivang: ping
[01:34] <ulaas> i want to go feisty. changing edgy repos to feisty is enough?
[01:35] <jsgmobile> Pretty much, yes
[01:36] <ulaas> then i do a dist-upgrade or the usual apt-get upgrade?
[01:38] <Hobbsee> ulaas: dist-upgrade.  please see the /topic 
[02:00] <giskard> hello pygi 
[02:02] <pygi> hey giskard, how are you?
 hey giskard, how are you?
[02:26] <pygi> in case you havent seen :P
[02:41] <tormod> ulaas, we might help you in #ubuntu+1 :)
[02:49] <mdke_> can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong under the section entitled "Ubuntu documents", the bash script isn't working as I thought it would. http://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/32736/
[03:03] <tormod> mdke_, is it ubuntu/dir/* or ubuntu/$$dir/* ?
[03:04] <mdke_> tormod: aha, nice catch. I suspect however that that isn't the only error, lemme try fixing that
[03:05] <tormod> mdke, the same for generic/dir/*
[03:05] <mdke_> yeah, it still doesn't like it. Error is:
[03:05] <mdke_> /bin/sh: Syntax error: end of file unexpected (expecting "done")
[03:06] <mdke_> tormod: yep, changed that now, thanks. Still the same error tho
[03:06] <Hobbsee> mdke_: does 53. 	done need to be done; \ like the others?
[03:08] <mdke_> Hobbsee: I don't think so, that was one of the things I didn't change since it last worked
[03:08] <Hobbsee> ah
[03:08] <Hobbsee> like i say, i know close to nothing about such things :P
[03:09] <gnomefreak> did ian stop maintaining FF?
[03:13] <tormod> mdke_, check for trailing spaces after \ (just guessing)
[03:14] <mdke_> tormod: double aha, I think that's it
[03:15] <mdke_> tormod: yep. Thanks!
[03:35] <mdke_> ok, next problem. I need to exclude certain types of files from the "for x in ubuntu/$$dir/*" line, such as files ending in ".sh" and ".pot". How can I do that? Apologies if it is veering off topic
[03:44] <bddebian> Howdy
[03:51] <sivang> pygi: pong
[04:59] <highvoltage> someone contacted me and he wants to host an official Ubuntu mirror, who is the right people I should put him in touch with? elmo or Znarl?
[05:01] <Seveas> highvoltage, #ubuntu-mirrors (and tell the person to have patience, admins are busy)
[05:12] <highvoltage> Seveas: ok :)
[05:12] <highvoltage> Seveas: thanks
[07:37] <_TomB> how do you rebuild a deb package after you've edited some stuff
[07:41] <pygi> _TomB: #ubuntu-motu, and "debuild -S -sa"
[07:41] <_TomB> thanks
[09:50] <Thigied_Asourer> hallo!
[09:54] <Thigied_Asourer> hm, jemand da?
[10:06] <popey> is it try that the *386 kernels dont have support for SMP? and the generic kernels have to be used?
[10:10] <_ion> fabbione: Hi. Have you noticed bug 72387?
[10:10] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 72387 in lvm-common "Incorrect dependency in initramfs script, system fails to boot. Patch attached" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/72387
[10:38] <jordi> jdub: pong?
[10:43] <jdub> jordi: hi!
[10:43] <jdub> jordi: do you know where the scan of mako on the mataro newspaper is?
[10:47] <jordi> jdub: hm hm
[10:47] <jordi> no, qgil might know?
[11:27] <ph8> hi all, I don't seem to have /lib32/libfl.a
[11:27] <ph8> does anyone here have it on their 64-bit system? if so would you mind telling me which package i need to get to get it!
[11:28] <ph8> i've got flex libraries in /lib
[11:28] <ph8> but i'm after the 32-bit equivalent