[11:18] <AlexExtreme> will logd ever have the functionality to replace sysklogd?
[11:19] <Keybuk> that's not the plan
[11:19] <Keybuk> I'd rather sysklogd grew the functionality to replace logd ;)
[11:19] <AlexExtreme> heh, ok
[11:20] <thom> can we bin both and use syslog-ng? :-)
[11:21] <Md> looks like a good plan
[11:22] <AlexExtreme> yeah, syslog-ng is better ;)
[11:22] <Keybuk> thom: if it's better, sure
[11:24] <AlexExtreme> i'll look around at it when i get home
[11:25] <AlexExtreme> anyway
[11:25] <AlexExtreme> bbl, got a few lessons now
[11:25] <Keybuk> AlexExtreme: not much, I suspect
[11:25] <Keybuk> it needs to cope with /var/log not being writable, and buffer into memory if not
[11:25] <Keybuk> and needs to have some mechanism to log things to a particular "job name"
[11:29] <thom> the latter is probably easy
[11:29] <thom> dunno about the former
[11:30] <Keybuk> I must admit, I've not looked at syslog-ng
[11:30] <Keybuk> I'd hope it has more than LOG_LOCAL0 thru 7, though
[11:30] <Keybuk> some nice way for apache to be apache, not LOCAL4 :p
[11:31] <Keybuk> briefly looking over the FAQ, I'd guess one would just need to write an upstart source
[11:33] <thom> yeah, that was the conclusion i was reaching
[06:10] <AlexExtreme> yawn
[06:10] <AlexExtreme> let's take a look at syslog-ng then
[06:18] <AlexExtreme> Keybuk: have you had time to take a look at the patches i submitted on launchpad? or are you still busy with other stuff?