[01:13] <BenC> infinity: You probably already know, but soyuz is borked
[01:13] <BenC> s/is/was/
[01:19] <infinity> BenC: Nah, had no clue, I'm trying to ignore work. :)
[01:20] <infinity> BenC: What sort of borkage?
[01:20] <BenC> it was telling me that linux-meta failed to build, but the log showed a build for some other package
[01:20] <infinity> !
[01:21] <infinity> BenC: On the website, or in the email sent to you, or both?
[01:21] <BenC> website
[01:21] <BenC> actually it showed dep-wait, because the package couldn't install all the deps it needed
[01:21] <fabbione> yo guys
[01:21] <derekS> is hald/udev related to the kernel? ie if they are having a bug, and i switch kernels, would that bug still be there?
[01:22] <infinity> Oh wow, the web interface is completely borked...
[01:23] <BenC> fabbione: Hey, how was your flight?
[01:23] <BenC> infinity: So is it ok, just that the web interface is broken?
[01:23] <infinity> BenC: No, I think the web breakage is a symptom of deeper arghitude.
[01:24] <infinity> BenC: I'm going to leave it in cprov's hands, and go back to VACing, but I'll check in later.
[01:24] <fabbione> BenC: almost eventless.. slept a lot.. talk with a couple of blonde hot chicks.. otherwise all good :)
[01:24] <BenC> fabbione: sounds like a pleasant flight :)
[01:25] <fabbione> yeah it was good
[01:25] <fabbione> Seattle airport sucks tho.. passport check is REALLY slow'
[02:09] <fabbione> infinity, BenC: did you guys already reported the problem to cprov?
[02:11] <infinity> fabbione: Yes.
[02:11] <infinity> fabbione: He's looking into it.
[02:11] <fabbione> infinity: ok thanks
[02:11] <fabbione> i assume we have no ETA..
[02:12] <infinity> Hard to have an ETA without knowing what broke.
[02:12] <fabbione> well they must have a record of the changes they did last week
[03:53] <infinity> BenC: should be all better now.
[03:56] <derekS> infinity: are hal/udev problems kernel issues?
[03:59] <infinity> derekS: They're userspace issues, though obviously, kernel changes can affect them.
[03:59] <infinity> derekS: This isn't a channel for reporting bugs either way.  File bugs on udev or hal (wheverever the problem is), and let it get triaged.
[04:00] <derekS> ok
[04:00] <derekS> thanks
[04:00] <derekS> i am trying to fix myself :)
[06:24] <infinity> [  160.240000]  fglrx: Unknown symbol sys_call_table
[06:24] <infinity> BenC: ^^^
[06:24] <BenC> where's that?
[06:24] <infinity> BenC: When trying to load fglrx.
[06:25] <BenC> which kernel I mean
[06:25] <infinity> BenC: -2-generic
[06:25] <infinity> (base)adconrad@cthulhu:~$ cat /proc/version /proc/version_signature 
[06:25] <infinity> Linux version 2.6.20-2-generic (root@vernadsky) (gcc version 4.1.2 20061212 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.1-21ubuntu2)) #3 SMP Sat Dec 16 12:28:13 UTC 2006
[06:25] <infinity> Ubuntu 2.6.20-2.2-generic
[06:26] <BenC> ok
[06:27] <infinity> BenC: Want a bug report with more useful info, or is that enough for you?
[06:27] <BenC> just a quick email to help me remember in the morning
[06:27] <infinity> benc@ or bcollins@ ?
[06:28] <infinity> I can never remember.
[06:28] <BenC> latter
[06:28] <fabbione> BenC: 
[06:28] <fabbione> git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bcollins/ubuntu-2.6.git ubuntu-2.6
[06:28] <fabbione> remote: Generating pack...
[06:28] <fabbione> remote: Done counting 398707 objects.
[06:28] <fabbione> fatal: unexpected EOF
[06:28] <fabbione> fatal: early EOF
[06:28] <fabbione> fatal: index-pack died with error code 128
[06:28] <fabbione> fetch-pack from 'git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bcollins/ubuntu-2.6.git' failed.
[06:28] <fabbione> any idea what could cause that?
[06:29] <infinity> BenC: Sent.
[06:29] <BenC> sounds like something on kernel-org
[06:29] <BenC> fabbione: try rookery:/srv/kernel-team
[06:29] <BenC> infinity: thanks
[06:29] <fabbione> BenC: ok
[06:32] <kkubasik> do kernel crash messages go to  a log file?
[06:32] <kkubasik> scratch that, I found it
[06:37] <kkubasik> ok, i am experiancing a crash with 2.6.20 386
[06:37] <kkubasik> http://pastebin.ca/283250
[06:38] <fabbione> kkubasik: file a bug in launchpad.'
[06:38] <kkubasik> alright, just wanted to make sure
[06:40] <fabbione> BenC: did you notice any regression on PB G4 with .20-1 ?
[06:40] <fabbione> it seems like the fn key is gone for good
[06:40] <fabbione> gonna check with older or newer kernel later
[12:53] <tepsipakki> what's the status of tg3-backport to dapper? Since there was a security-release last week, I suspect it will still take a while?
[02:44] <Lure> BenC: just noticed this on 2.6.20: 
[02:44] <Lure> [   25.304000]  speedstep-centrino with X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPIconfig is depr
[02:44] <Lure> ecated.
[02:44] <Lure> [   25.304000]   Use X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ (acpi-cpufreq instead.
[03:44] <BenC> Lure: good to know, thanks
[03:44] <Lure> BenC: not sure if this was before in -17 and -19 - I just noticed it today on -20-2
[03:45] <BenC> I think it has to do with some new config options that weren't adjusted for
[03:45] <BenC> would be nice to have gotten a compile time warning about that
[03:45] <kylem> moo.
[03:46] <BenC> kylem: Roar! (like a bear)
[03:51] <kylem> gah. enough with the bloody bear.s :)
[03:53] <BenC> I showed me family the good/bad bear at an early Christmas gathering yesterday
[03:53] <BenC> I think I ruined Christmas
[03:59] <Lure> BenC: more info: http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/1/25
[04:08] <BenC> Lure: Thanks, made the config changes
[05:27] <mjg59> BenC: I don't quite understand your objection to the dscape patch
[05:28] <BenC> mjg59: No objections, just somehow I managed not to have the ieee80211_ptr part of it in there
[05:28] <BenC> Going to try having it in there next upload
[05:28] <mjg59> BenC: Ah, ok. 
[05:29] <mjg59> That would explain things :)
[05:38] <luneo> I have a question.... Is there any way to maintain a Ingo Molnar rt patch based kernel? and I know that the rt patch from Molnar breaks the others ubuntu patches...
[05:39] <BenC> bug 76294
[05:39] <BenC> luneo: Sure, you are more than welcome to do that
[05:44] <luneo> Another question... I am trying to cross-compile the rt15 kernel from Molnar... my host system is a ia32... and I am trying to compile for x64 systems... but the toolchain-source dosen't compile... gcc dosen't compile... so I used some wrappers... to parse the m64 thing,.. but at the infiniband driver, I get and error 1 and 2, (2.6.19.1 kernel), and the config is based on the Molnar x64 config... and he didn't had any problem... is the
[05:44] <luneo>  a solution for the toolchain-source...
[05:47] <luneo> for the toolchain-source I just did, tpkg-make amd64-linux, debuild binutils and debi, and then, tpkg-install-libc amd64, debuild gcc...
[06:00] <luneo> ok, thanks for the effort tough...
[07:24] <\sh> moins
[07:25] <\sh> did anybody have a clue about this error message? Dec 18 19:23:11 fai-noc kernel: [361111.808688]  sudosh[31758]  general protection rip:402fd3 rsp:7fffffa6a6d0 error:0
[07:26] <joejaxx> BenC: is 20-2 compiled with cell support enabled?
[07:26] <BenC> yeah
[07:26] <joejaxx> BenC: thank you :)
[07:27] <BenC> you going to test it?
[07:27] <joejaxx> i have someone to test it
[07:27] <BenC> I'd really like to know if it works on ps3 :)
[07:27] <joejaxx> yeah :) i am going to build a fluxbuntu feisty image with that kernel
[07:28] <joejaxx> for testing
[07:28] <joejaxx> BenC: i will let you know how it goes :)
[07:28] <BenC> thanks
[07:28] <joejaxx> BenC: you are most welcome
[07:28] <pmjdebruijn> Cell support is going to be included on the PPC iso?
[07:29] <BenC> the kernel has the cell options enabled
[07:29] <BenC> whether we support it or not is a different story
[07:29] <pmjdebruijn> ok, unofficially support it
[07:30] <joejaxx> BenC: i think the biggest problem whould be the fact that people do not have machines to test it
[07:31] <pmjdebruijn> won't that be just a matter of time?
[07:31] <joejaxx> BenC: everyone has i386's and powerpcs
[07:31] <pmjdebruijn> I mean Cell is just one configuration, just the PlayStation III, it's not like with a PC that you can have a quadrilion hardware configurations
[07:31] <joejaxx> pmjdebruijn: i do not know if everyone is going to go out and buy a $600 gaming system for testing support
[07:35] <pmjdebruijn> joejaxx, of course not... but some folks are bound to buy a PS3
[07:44] <Keybuk> BenC: OOPS are not my friends
[08:03] <BenC> pmj: question is will those ppl be capable of getting it working
[08:03] <BenC> hmm, he left
[08:03] <ivoks> eh :/
[08:03] <ivoks> um, BenC i know this isn't support channel, but i'm kind of clueless where to look :)
[08:04] <ivoks> BenC: do you know what could cause high loand (kacpid-work-0 takes 100% proc) with amd64 version of kernel (dapper) on intel xeon?
[08:04] <BenC> not off hand
[08:04] <ivoks> ok, thanks :)
[08:32] <joejaxx> BenC: the G5's use the powerpc64 kernel?
[08:33] <BenC> yes
[08:33] <joejaxx> hmmm interesting
[08:47] <PriceChild> ping BenC
[08:47] <BenC> PriceChild: pong
[08:47] <PriceChild> Hi there :)
[08:48] <PriceChild> I'm a moderator from ubuntuforum. I'm here regarding a thread which has turned into actively suggesting people use the feisty kernel packages on their edgy system for "testing"
[08:48] <BenC> who started the thread?
[08:48] <BenC> or started the suggestion I mean
[08:48] <PriceChild> was talking to laser jock about it who referred me to you to check what we thought
[08:49] <BenC> basically it's a good idea, as long as initramfs-tools, module-init-tools and udev are also upgraded from feisty
[08:50] <BenC> I still run edgy on all the machines I use for kernel testing
[08:50] <PriceChild> pochu, tormod, 
[08:50] <PriceChild> Ok
[08:51] <PriceChild> I posted a big scary red message telling people that they shouldn't be doing this... I'll edit it to say it is "sort of ok" if they upgrade those packages. However may still have problems and it will be hard for people to support them?>
[08:54] <PriceChild> BenC: also what about bug reports from users using this method?
[08:55] <BenC> as long as it's a kernel bug, and not some userspace issue, then file it as normal
[08:55] <PriceChild> ok thankyou for your clarifcations :)
[08:55] <PriceChild> *clarifications
[08:56] <BenC> np
[09:17] <zul> mmmm...evil
[09:17] <zul> ..
[10:23] <dade`> 516M    ubuntu-2.6
[10:23] <dade`> never noticed :)
[11:10] <Toadstool> heya!
[11:13] <Toadstool> http://librarian.launchpad.net/5420830/buildlog_ubuntu-feisty-amd64.ifplugd_0.28-2.1ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz <-- does anybody have any idea why the build worked on i386 and failed on the other archs?
[11:20] <thom> Toadstool: looks like a linux-libc-dev bug
[11:47] <BenC> Toadstool: It should not include linux/types.h
[11:48] <Toadstool> ok thanks a lot :)