[12:11] <Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas.
[12:42] <Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas.
[12:46] <mc44> Seveas: Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas :)
[12:48] <Seveas> mc44, it probably is saying that for 2 hours already
[12:48] <mc44> indeed
[12:49] <Seveas> I've switched mailservers
[12:49] <Seveas> no more courier
[12:49] <Seveas> postfix+dovecot now
[01:12] <Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas.
[01:42] <Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas.
[02:12] <Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas.
[02:13] <bddebian> Boo
[02:43] <Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas.
[02:45] <gnomefreak> Seveas: just checking all the pinging. looks like bot is down
[02:45] <crimsun_> he says he has switched mail servers
[02:45] <gnomefreak> ah ok
[03:13] <Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas.
[03:43] <Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas.
[04:13] <Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas.
[04:21] <owh> I've been working with sistpoty on fixing a number of dosfstools bugs. sistpoty has now attached a patch to one of the bugs, and another patch to another of the bugs. I own one bug, he owns another. He's gone off to bed and this is the first bug I'm fixing for Ubuntu. How do I tell the system that there is a fix? Do I just set the status to "Fix Committed", or do I need to do some steps first?
[04:21] <owh> He's already marked his bug as fixed and the upload was completed before he went to sleep. I'm just doing my bit :-)
[04:22] <Hobbsee> !info dosfstools feisty
[04:22] <ubotu> dosfstools: Utilities to create and check MS-DOS FAT filesystems. In component main, is standard. Version 2.11-2.1ubuntu1 (feisty), package size 50 kB, installed size 144 kB
[04:22] <Hobbsee> owh: what's the bug # of yours?
[04:23] <owh> Bug #68153
[04:23] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 68153 in dosfstools "fsck.vfat hangs after renaming to FSCK9999.REN" [Undecided,Confirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/68153
[04:23] <owh> His is Bug #62831
[04:23] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 62831 in dosfstools "fsck.vfat truncates files of 4294967295 bytes length to 0 bytes at boot-time" [High,Fix committed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/62831
[04:23] <owh> We were working on it together, he uploaded his fix and I pointed out another problem.
[04:24] <owh> So, I'm just trying to figure out how that is supposed to work.
[04:24] <Hobbsee> owh: ubuntu-main-sponsors is subscribed to the bug, so they should upload it for you.  however, feel free to ask sistpoty to upload it when he wakes up again
[04:24] <Hobbsee> nice :)
[04:25] <owh> Do I need to change the status, or will ubuntu-main-sponsors take care of that?
[04:25] <owh> I can set it to In Progress
[04:25] <Hobbsee> they'll do it
[04:26] <owh> Should I set it to "In Progress" to show that we're working on it?
[04:26] <Hobbsee> you dont need to - the main sponsoring people tend to do that, once one of them is
[04:27] <owh> Cool, so my work here is done :-)
[04:28] <owh> Thanks Hobbsee for your time.
[04:30] <Hobbsee> not a problem :)
[04:30] <Hobbsee> yeah, should be

[04:31] <owh> Hiya, thanks for your initial introduction Admiral_Chicago, much appreciated. How did you go with your paper?
[04:32] <Admiral_Chicago> owh: it went well, almost done with finals
[04:32] <Admiral_Chicago> rocked it on my calc final too
[04:32] <owh> All good then. Next you'll need to shave ;-)
[04:33] <Admiral_Chicago> owh: teed any help with any tricky bugs
[04:34] <owh> Not at the moment. I'm about to pack up my satellite dish and get ready to move to another town 600km up the road, then I'll come back on-line and do some more work :-)
[04:34] <owh> http://itmaze.com.au/locations/
[04:37] <Admiral_Chicago> good
[04:38] <Hobbsee> owh: nice.  keep fixing :)
[04:44] <Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas.
[04:47] <bddebian> heh
[04:47] <Jucato> weeeee :)
[04:50] <Hobbsee> ajmitch: email, or irc?
[04:51] <ajmitch> email
[04:52] <ajmitch> it looks like my isp just sent me mail that's been queued for up to 2 weeks
[04:52] <ajmitch> since it appears to all be to one email address
[04:52] <Hobbsee> ouch
[04:54] <ajmitch> yeah
[04:54] <ajmitch> 400+ spam messages into my inbox
[04:54] <Admiral_Chicago> maybe one of you wants to try this bug, it's really a feature request
[04:55] <Admiral_Chicago> if you have a user who isn't in the "admin" group
[04:55] <Admiral_Chicago> and you hit sudo anything, nothing happens, however there is no output
[04:56] <Admiral_Chicago> however, i think the user shold have SOME output, "hey you don't have admin rights" etc
[04:56] <nixternal> doesn't it say that you have insufficient rights?
[04:56] <Admiral_Chicago> no
[04:56] <Admiral_Chicago> nothing
[04:57] <nixternal> does it ask for a password?
[04:57] <nixternal> and after you enter it, what happens?
[04:57] <Admiral_Chicago> err, i don't think so
[04:58] <nixternal> umm..sounds like a booged sudoers
[04:58] <Admiral_Chicago> I did "sudo dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg" and I got no output
[04:59] <nixternal> no editing was done to the sudoers file was it?
[04:59] <Admiral_Chicago> no
[04:59] <Admiral_Chicago> although i put the insult flag to my sudo file...
[05:00] <ajmitch> usually it says that you've been naughty, the access will be logged (iirc)
[05:01] <nixternal> ya
[05:02] <ajmitch>   /win 28
[05:14] <Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas.
[05:44] <Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas.
[06:14] <Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas.
[06:32] <lifeless> Seveas: pke
[06:32] <lifeless> Seveas: Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveass
[06:45] <Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas.
[07:05] <DarkMageZ> lifeless, he's well aware of the issue :p
[07:15] <Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas.
[07:45] <Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas.
[08:15] <Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas.
[08:45] <Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas.
[09:16] <Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas.
[09:41] <dholbach> good morning
[09:46] <Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas.
[09:57] <Seveas> @unload Bugtracker
[10:16] <Ubugtu> WARNING: No bugmail received in 30 minutes. Please poke Seveas.
[10:19] <Seveas> argh
[04:41] <bddebian> Boo
[04:57] <ogra> bee
[05:01] <bddebian> :-)
[08:25] <Yawner> Ubugtu broken again?
[08:25] <palski> seems so
[08:26] <sfllaw> Hmm.
[08:26] <sfllaw> Just upgraded Feisty again and it seems to have broken Nautilus's default application choices.
[08:27] <sfllaw> Now it says things like:
[08:27] <sfllaw> Could not open location 'file:///home/sfllaw/Photos'
[08:27] <Yawner> nice
[08:27] <sfllaw> There is no default action associated with this function.
[08:32] <Admiral_Chicago> sfllaw: i think i saw a bug report about someting like that
[08:32] <sfllaw> I've been searching for a while.
[08:32] <sfllaw> It's obviously a Nautilus bug.
[08:32] <sfllaw> seb128 uploaded a new version yesterday.
[08:35] <sfllaw> bug 76482
[08:37] <seb128> sfllaw: that bug is weird
[08:38] <sfllaw> seb128: Well, I can reproduce it right here.
[08:38] <seb128> sfllaw: folders are not handled the same way as datas, they should not break
[08:38] <sfllaw> seb128: Can I get you any information off my machine?
[08:38] <seb128> sfllaw: I can with some openoffice.org file, not with a directory though
[08:38] <seb128> sfllaw: yeah, a sec
[08:38] <seb128> sfllaw: what mimetype do you have to the folder properties?
[08:39] <sfllaw> sfllaw@jamaica:/etc/gnome$ gnomevfs-info $HOME
[08:39] <sfllaw> Name              : sfllaw
[08:39] <sfllaw> Type              : Directory
[08:39] <sfllaw> MIME type         : x-directory/normal
[08:39] <sfllaw> Size              : 4096
[08:39] <sfllaw> Blocks            : 8
[08:39] <sfllaw> I/O block size    : 4096
[08:39] <sfllaw> Local             : YES
[08:39] <sfllaw> SUID              : NO
[08:39] <sfllaw> SGID              : NO
[08:39] <sfllaw> Sticky            : NO
[08:39] <sfllaw> Permissions       : 1600755
[08:39] <sfllaw> Link count        : 79
[08:39] <sfllaw> UID               : 1000
[08:39] <sfllaw> GID               : 1000
[08:39] <sfllaw> Access time       : Tue Dec 19 14:34:18 2006
[08:39] <sfllaw> Modification time : Tue Dec 19 14:15:40 2006
[08:39] <sfllaw> Change time       : Tue Dec 19 14:15:40 2006
[08:39] <sfllaw> Device #          : 2049
[08:39] <sfllaw> Inode #           : 9732098
[08:39] <sfllaw> Readable          : YES
[08:39] <sfllaw> Writable          : YES
[08:39] <sfllaw> Executable        : YES
[08:41] <seb128> hum
[08:42] <sfllaw> For what it's worth, `nautilus $HOME` works.
[08:43] <seb128> ok, so I can get the same here
[08:43] <seb128> I misread what you were saying
[08:43] <sfllaw> Ha ha!  I'm not insane!
[08:43] <seb128> I though nautilus was broken on folders for you
[08:44] <sfllaw> Should this be filed under libgnome2-0?
[08:44] <sfllaw> That hasn't been changed in a while, though.
[08:46] <seb128> ah ah
[08:46] <seb128> iz glib bog
[08:46] <sfllaw> OK.
[08:46] <seb128> I'm on it
[08:47] <sfllaw> Ah.
[08:47] <sfllaw> I'll change the bug package.
[08:47] <seb128> sfllaw: don't bother, I'll close it soon and update that :)
[08:47] <sfllaw> Eep.  Too late!
[08:47] <seb128> np, that's fine too ;)
[08:47] <sfllaw> seb128: Thanks for the fast response!
[08:48] <seb128> np
[08:48] <seb128> sfllaw: BTW could you approve #73115?
[08:48] <seb128> that's a trivial one line
[08:48] <seb128> and upstream keep pinging me about it
[08:49] <sfllaw> I was just about to, actually.
[08:49] <sfllaw> When I dist-upgraded.
[08:49] <sfllaw> :)
[08:52] <seb128> good ;)
[08:53] <sfllaw> Gah!  Now VMware is broken.
[08:53] <sfllaw> Running feisty is painful.
[08:53] <sfllaw> :)
[11:51] <Adri2000> sfllaw: bug 76490 importance should be medium or high?
[11:51] <Adri2000> https://bugs.launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/egnome/+bug/76490
[11:54] <Adri2000> hmm, would be medium since the package is installed and should work, but the docs are not built
[12:01] <sfllaw> Adri2000: That's a medium bug.
[12:02] <sfllaw> It's not installable, which is bad.
[12:02] <sfllaw> But it's also not a main package.
[12:03] <Adri2000> ok :)