[12:25] <KirillZ> Hey guys, I get "Couldn't find package courier-imap" after doing "apt-get install courier-imap". Any help would be greatly appreciated, thanks for the help :)
[12:26] <fernando> Tjikkun_, enable your universe repository and try again
[02:51] <dthacker> When a triager requests more info, how long should he/she wait before moving to rejected for lack of response?
[05:36] <marnanel> hey, when I add an upstream dependency on a bug in launchpad, it says there is no upstream maintainer for metacity that it knows about
[05:36] <marnanel> may I be that upstream maintainer?
[05:36] <marnanel> how do I let it know that I am?
[06:25] <lifeless> marnanel: I think that means it wants the metacity product setup in launchpad, at launchpad.net/products
[06:25] <lifeless> have a look, see if there is one, if there isn't, make it - and set it up appropriately (to use the gnome bugtracker etc)
[07:52] <marnanel> lifeless: thank you!
[02:14] <kyja> edgy is unstable for me.
[02:14] <kyja> Linux kyja-laptop 2.6.17-10-386 #2 Tue Dec 5 22:26:18 UTC 2006 i686 GNU/Linux
[02:14] <kyja> on HP zd8000
[02:14] <kyja> it runs for 24 hours and then loses the ability to launch programs
[02:15] <kyja> I am unable to open a new terminal or even open the dialog to reboot.
[02:24] <jwendell> does someone know about a libssl-dev bug? it's unistalable in edgy
[02:25] <jwendell> i did not found any bug like that in LP...
[02:25] <jwendell> i don't believe nobody else noticed this :)
[02:25] <geser> what's the exact error message?
[02:25] <Hobbsee> it should have been picked up by the automatic unmet deps
[02:28] <jwendell> libssl-dev: Depends: libssl0.9.8 (= 0.9.8b-2ubuntu2) but 0.9.8c-3 is to be installed
[02:29] <Hobbsee> jwendell: please paste apt-cache policy libssl0.9.8
[02:30] <jwendell> relevant lines:
[02:30] <jwendell> Source: openssl
[02:30] <jwendell> Version: 0.9.8b-2ubuntu2
[02:30] <jwendell> Depends: libssl0.9.8 (= 0.9.8b-2ubuntu2), zlib1g-dev
[02:30] <jwendell> Conflicts: ssleay (<< 0.9.2b), libssl08-dev, libssl09-dev, libssl095a-dev, libssl096-dev
[02:30] <jwendell> Depends line is wrong...
[02:30] <Hobbsee> no, wrong thing.
[02:30] <Hobbsee> i asked for apt-cache policy libssl0.9.8
[02:30] <Hobbsee> what have you been installing that from debian for?
[02:31] <Hobbsee> depends line is perfectly correct, you've been installing from unofficial repos for something
[02:31] <jwendell> sorry, one sec
[02:32] <jwendell> sorry, my mistake
[02:32] <jwendell> i have installed it from debian
[02:32] <Hobbsee> indeed.
[02:33] <Hobbsee> what from?
[02:33] <Hobbsee> s/from/for/
[02:57] <dthacker> If a triage person requests more info on a bug, what is the customary amount of time to wait before moving the bug to rejected?
[02:57] <Hobbsee> until they reply, or until the bug is no longer in the program
[02:57] <Hobbsee> usually
[03:08] <dthacker> Hobsee: If I don't receive any reply, and it is never assigned to upstream or the ubuntu maintainer, how will it get fixed?
[03:09] <gnomefreak> dthacker: 30 days is a good time normally if ther eis no responce
[03:13] <Hobbsee> assigning doesnt actually do tha tmuch...
[03:19] <dthacker> tnx
[03:23] <jwendell> Hobbsee, i needed to install rdesktop 1.5, which depends on libssl >= 0.9.8c
[03:23] <Hobbsee> !info rdesktop
[03:23] <ubotu> rdesktop: RDP client for Windows NT/2000 Terminal Server. In component main, is optional. Version 1.4.1-1.1 (edgy), package size 98 kB, installed size 388 kB
[03:23] <Hobbsee> ah
[03:23] <Hobbsee> !info rdesktop feisty
[03:23] <ubotu> rdesktop: RDP client for Windows NT/2000 Terminal Server. In component main, is optional. Version 1.5.0-1 (feisty), package size 118 kB, installed size 444 kB
[03:24] <jwendell> Hobbsee, i got it from debian, i guess it's the same of feisty
[03:24] <jwendell> a long time ago...
[03:28] <Hobbsee> ah
[04:12] <bddebian> Boo
[04:13] <marnanel> boo
[04:13] <jelmer> *schrik*
[04:19] <bddebian> schrik?
[04:20] <jelmer> dutch for *scared*
[04:49] <bddebian> jelmer: Ah :)
[09:51] <cge> Is it actually a hug day today, or has that been there all week?
[09:52] <nixternal> every day is a hug day if you ask me :)
[09:53] <nixternal> although it seems bug mail is broke, as I am not receiving any in my email either
[09:54] <cge> Ah - I was wondering why I hadn't received any.
[09:54] <dthacke1> I think the mail broke yesterday
[09:59] <dthacke1> so I picked up some old skool bugs
[10:04] <gnomefreak> anyone speak multi languages?
[10:04] <Adri2000> cge: I think today is hug day, it's wednesday :)
[10:05] <Adri2000> gnomefreak: I speak french
[10:05] <gnomefreak> hmmmmm
[10:06] <bddebian> No habla espanol
[10:06] <gnomefreak> Nemohu opravit problmy, nkter balky drte v porouchanm stavu
[10:06] <gnomefreak> i dont think thats french is it?
[10:06] <Adri2000> no, I don't think so :P
[10:06] <bddebian> Looks more Russian to me but I'm an idiot :)
[10:06] <nixternal> looks polish
[10:06] <nixternal> or russian
[10:06] <gnomefreak> nope not it
[10:06] <gnomefreak> polish or check is what im thinking
[10:06] <nixternal> czech?
[10:06] <gnomefreak> neither google has translaters for
[10:06] <nixternal> check..hhaha
[10:07] <gnomefreak> :(
[10:07] <bddebian> heh
[10:07] <gnomefreak> yes that
[10:08] <gnomefreak> ha it is cz
[10:09] <gnomefreak> now to find a translator
[10:17] <gnomefreak> they dont get much more generic than that error:(