[12:39] <Odd_Bloke> Hmm, the Launchpad bug report emails make it really hard to filter them into a separate folder.
[12:39] <mdke> Odd_Bloke: they are quite easy to filter, they have their own headers :)
[12:39] <mdke> :0
[12:39] <mdke> * ^X-Launchpad-Bug.* 
[12:39] <mdke> .Bugs/
[12:39] <LarstiQ> Odd_Bloke: they filter really well :)
[12:40] <mdke> except, you can't filter them into lots of different folders very well
[12:40] <mdke> because they don't state the product/source package
[12:40] <mdke> that's a bit of a pain
[12:41] <LarstiQ> they do for products at least
[12:41] <LarstiQ> X-Launchpad-Bug: product=bzr; status=Confirmed; importance=Medium;                                                                                                       
[12:41] <LarstiQ> I'd think they also mention source package in case of distributions, but I'm an upstream kind of guy, so not sure.
[12:42] <mdke> oh yeah :)
[12:42] <mdke> still, that information should be in the body of the email, not just for filtering but for identifiability
[12:43] <Odd_Bloke> I noticed that but missed the filter by header option in my mail client. :S
[12:43] <Odd_Bloke> Thanks guys.
[12:43] <LarstiQ> procmail \o/
[01:05] <LaserJock> hi quick question. I'm trying to set up something that people can file a bug against to request a program's inclusion into Universe. Would a product be the right thing to create?
[01:05] <kiko> LaserJock, why not against ubuntu plain?
[01:05] <LaserJock> or can "dummy" packages be created
[01:06] <LaserJock> kiko: well, it will be quite a large number and perhaps hard to track if it's just against Ubuntu
[01:06] <kiko> LaserJock, use a tag to group them?
[01:06] <LaserJock> heh, maybe
[01:06] <LaserJock> it's hard to get people to do anything standard
[01:06] <LaserJock> if I can give them a URL it would be best
[01:07] <kiko> for +filebug you mean, right?
[01:07] <LaserJock> yeah
[01:07] <LaserJock> can you "preload" bugs with tags?
[01:07] <kiko> that's a good question. something like +filebug?tag=universe-request ?
[01:07] <LaserJock> yeah
[01:07] <kiko> you can't currently but that wouldn't be too hard to implement if you convinced BjornT :)
[01:08] <LaserJock> hmm
[01:08] <LaserJock> so you think registering a product wouldn't be good?
[01:08] <mdke> the bug on Ubuntu plain is kinda logical, given that the absence of a package in Ubuntu is a bug in Ubuntu itself
[01:08] <kiko> that's why I suggested it
[01:09] <kiko> LaserJock, I'd rather products be used for real products
[01:09] <LaserJock> I see
[01:09] <kiko> real upstreams IYKWIM
[01:09] <kiko> LaserJock, I am however game for trying to get preloading of tags going RSN for you
[01:10] <LaserJock> kiko-zzz: file a bug against Malone?
[01:10] <kiko-zzz> LaserJock, please do, and ping me about it tomorrow
[01:11] <kiko-zzz> I need to catch some zs
[01:11] <LaserJock> kiko-zzz: will do, thanks
[01:50] <LaserJock> kiko-zzz: Bug #79671, thanks
[01:50] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 79671 in malone "preload tags for +filebug" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/79671
[01:55] <Ubugtu> New bug: #79671 in malone "preload tags for +filebug" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/79671
[02:45] <Ubugtu> New bug: #79674 in rosetta "List translatable upstreams on separate page, sample on front page" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/79674
[04:47] <Mez> do the buildds email you only if it fails, or if it's successful aswell ?
[04:50] <ajmitch> only on failures, thankfully
[04:50] <ajmitch> I'd hate to get that much spam
[04:57] <thumper> ajmitch: you get out for lunch much?
[04:58] <ajmitch> yeah, I make sure I get out of the office
[04:58] <ajmitch> I'm in the octagon, so it's nice & easy to go somewhere for lunch
[05:00] <thumper> ajmitch: I was considering walking down the hill tomorrow, wanna meet for lunch?
[05:00] <ajmitch> sure, where do you want to meet up?
[05:00] <thumper> octagon sounds fine, I live in Roslyn now
[05:00] <ajmitch> ok
[05:00] <thumper> how about the Robbie statue around 12ish
[05:01] <ajmitch> sounds fine
[05:01] <thumper> I'll wear my geek tee-shirt
[05:01] <thumper> :)
[05:01] <ajmitch> yeah, I can't really wear my ubuntu shirt to work :)
[05:01] <thumper> damn
[05:02] <thumper> do you have a google calendar?
[05:02] <ajmitch> no, but I suspect I can set one up quickly
[05:03] <thumper> if you have a vodafone mobile, it can send you sms to remind you :)
[05:03] <ajmitch> ok, I do
[05:03] <ajmitch> oh that's useful
[06:59] <mruiz> Hi. I have a problem with launchpad email notification. I  received two emails, after I approved a member (ubuntu-cl).
[07:15] <Mez> mruiz, quite possibly due to you being an admin and you doing the change (you get one for doing the change, one for being an admin that goes to all admins)
[07:17] <mruiz> Mez, we only have one admin:  mruiz  :D
[07:18] <Mez> yes - but you're still an admin
[07:19] <mruiz> np Mez 
[07:20] <mruiz> I suspect that it is a bug/feature (since last commit)
[08:27] <Madpilot> Anyone with LP admin rights around? There's someone who's been spamming help.u.c/c - their account needs disabling...
[08:30] <Madpilot> here's the idiot: https://launchpad.net/~tuckeett
[08:30] <Mez> stub's the most recently active
[08:30] <Madpilot> check the attachments here: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Kypir
[08:31] <Madpilot> https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Kypir?action=AttachFile
[08:31] <Mez> Madpilot, no such page
[08:31] <Mez> oh
[08:31] <Mez> ouch
[08:31] <Madpilot> view attachements - URL I just pasted
[08:31] <Madpilot> he was around a few days ago, mdke & I cleaned up, but forgot to ping the LP admins to get the account frozen
[08:33] <Madpilot> seems to be some sort of pathetic attempt at linkfarming
[08:33] <Mez> even though the links dont go to any decent sites
[08:33] <Mez> :(
[08:33] <Mez> darn
[08:34] <Mez> I wanted free porn
[08:34] <Mez> Madpilot, might be better to email the canonical admin rt
[08:34] <Madpilot> "Free as in porn"? ;)
[08:34] <stub> disabled
[08:35] <Madpilot> stub, thanks. I'll clean the wiki up now
[08:35] <Mez> or wait for stub
[08:35] <Mez> Madpilot, it brings a whole new meaning to "free porn" doesnt it ?
[08:36] <Madpilot> heh
[08:41] <Madpilot> crap cleared up...
[09:47] <mdke> stub: thanks for that. It was the subject of https://launchpad.net/launchpad/+ticket/3175 - I'll close it, but I wanted to let you know because I'm slightly concerned that these support tickets don't get seen by you guys
[09:48] <stub> I have no idea who is supposed to be triaging them. Perhaps matsubara?
[09:49] <carlos> morning
[09:49] <stub> In theory, everyone here should be seeing the tickets: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-qa
[09:50] <mdke> stub: yeah, that's what I thought :(
[09:57] <mdke> stub: perhaps a way to add priority to tickets would assist
[09:57] <mdke> we could have avoided that spamfest
[10:20] <Ubugtu> New bug: #80209 in launchpad "LaunchpadBrowserPublication being used for XML-RPC" [Wishlist,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/80209
[10:51] <Bhaskar> jinty: hello
[10:54] <Bhaskar> jinty: i am preparing a list of missing string, i will send you after some hours
[10:55] <jinty> Bhaskar, please send it to the schooltool list rather
[10:55] <Bhaskar> jinty: ok
[12:54] <danilos> carlos: re bug 68201, I don't see any orca imports in the queue, and I don't know where else to look
[12:54] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 68201 in gnome-orca "No translations for gnome-orca" [Medium,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/68201 - Assigned to Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs)
[12:54] <danilos> carlos: and hi :)
[12:56] <carlos> danilos: hi
[12:57] <carlos> danilos: that kind of bugs is because either the package lacks the .pot file regeneration
[12:59] <danilos> or? (I know of that, but I am not sure how to best check that -- i.e. should I look into binary package or source package?)
[12:59] <danilos> carlos: ^
[01:00] <carlos> or we have the .pot file as FAILED (sorry, got distracted)
[01:01] <carlos> danilos: first you need to be sure that it's not BLOCKED or FAILED, our UI for that sucks
[01:01] <danilos> carlos: I checked by looking in the translationimportqueueentry table in the db, so that's covered :)
[01:02] <carlos> danilos: so I recomend you DB queries 
[01:02] <carlos> ok
[01:02] <carlos> then, check the source code of that package
[01:02] <danilos> ok, I'll let dholbach know about the possible problems and help him with identifying the culprit
[01:07] <carlos> hm, I thought I already answered a request like that for gnome-orca
[01:14] <danilos> carlos: btw, do you know what they need to do to fix the problem? iow, how to include the POT (it's indeed missing) in the generated file?
[01:15] <carlos> danilos: they know how to
[01:15] <carlos> it's a debbuild script
[01:15] <danilos> carlos: ok, good for them then :)
[01:15] <carlos> Martin prepared it in a standard way so it's just a rule to add
[01:25] <static> hello launchpad!
[01:25] <Ubugtu> New bug: #80238 in rosetta "language packages with kde help files missing" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/80238
[02:21] <Ubugtu> New bug: #80243 in malone "unknown bug watch url no instructions" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/80243
[02:26] <Ubugtu> New bug: #80244 in malone "Bugwatch update script failed to parse XML description" [Undecided,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/80244
[02:30] <Ubugtu> New bug: #80245 in launchpad "(critical) email disclosure from "add a subscriber"'s search function" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/80245
[02:37] <kiko> BjornT, have you noticed that the guided filebug form doesn't allow one to file security bugs?
[02:40] <BjornT> kiko: hmm, right. does it make much sense to file security bugs on the guided filebug, though? usually security bugs are private, so you won't find duplicates anyway.
[02:47] <kiko> BjornT, I think the issue is more that the user isn't aware of the fact that the advanced form does allow filing privates
[02:52] <BjornT> kiko: yeah. i guess putting a security checkbox on the +filebug page wouldn't hurt. or do you think modifying the text that links to the advanced filebug page would be better?
[02:54] <kiko> I'm actually not sure. I want to check with pitti/mdz that this feature is desireable at all first
[03:42] <kiko> stub, ping?
[03:42] <kiko> stub, any idea why we don't use CONTAINSSTRING in place of explicit LIKEs?
[04:06] <matsubara> does anybody know which bug tracker CUPS use?
[04:10] <kiko> it uses a really weird PHP thing
[04:10] <kiko> I've looked at it a few times
[04:10] <LarstiQ> kiko: have you progressed any on Mantis?
[04:12] <kiko> LarstiQ, I am stuck testing it, but I have it working 100%
[04:13] <LarstiQ> kiko: can I help get you unstuck?
[04:13] <kiko> LarstiQ, hmm, let me look at the branch again this afternoon
[04:14] <LarstiQ> k
[04:46] <stub> kiko-fud: no reason apart from people cribbing from code that didn't use it.
[04:46] <kiko-fud> heh
[04:46] <kiko-fud> stub, ok.
[04:58] <flacoste> kiko-fud, stub: can I use OUTER JOIN using SQLObject.select()?
[05:04] <salgado> flacoste, AFAIK, only if you do something .select("id in (... OUTER JOIN ...)"), which is not what you seem to want
[05:05] <flacoste> salgado: well, that could work
[05:08] <MagicFab> The importance status of upstream-reported bugs does not seem to be updated although it is set upstream - where should I look for an existing bug report fot his or to report it 
[05:08] <MagicFab> Example: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-panel/+bug/54034
[05:08] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 54034 in xfce4-panel "XFCE Kiosk Mode Broken" [Unknown,Fix released]  
[05:32] <flacoste> kiko-fud, matsubara-lunch: when you come back from lunch, can one of you run the following query on staging and report the runtime?
[05:33] <flacoste> kiko-fud, matsubara-lunch: https://devpad.canonical.com/~andrew/paste/file5SKxZ3.html
[05:35] <salgado> flacoste, I can do that for you
[05:35] <flacoste> salgado: you can! awesome!
[05:36] <salgado> flacoste, https://devpad.canonical.com/~salgado/flacoste.txt
[05:37] <flacoste> salgado: thanks!
[05:37] <salgado> flacoste, you're welcome. :)
[05:38] <salgado> flacoste, btw, how's the baby?
[05:39] <flacoste> salgado: he's really fine, complain a lot when he's hungry,  and a little when he's tired, but other than that he's really charming
[05:40] <flacoste> salgado: bunch of pictures available at http://www.contre.com/albums/Jules_Ulysse_Dumoulin
[05:40] <salgado> heh. I guess that's expected
[05:40] <salgado> ah, nice
[05:45] <MagicFab> The importance status of upstream-reported bugs does not seem to be updated although it is set upstream - where should I look for an existing bug report fot his or to report it 
[05:45] <MagicFab> Example: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-panel/+bug/54034
[05:45] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 54034 in xfce4-panel "XFCE Kiosk Mode Broken" [Unknown,Fix released]  
[05:49] <somerville32> kiko, :)
[05:50] <somerville32> kiko: Can we add Xubuntu to the the mirror prober?
[05:51] <somerville32> MagicFab: How long has the bug watch been there?
[05:51] <kiko> somerville32, nope, the prober isn't available to other distros at this time.
[05:51] <kiko> MagicFab, I think it's a bug in the importance mapping code.
[05:54] <somerville32> kiko: But Xubuntu isn't just another distro - It is Xubuntu! :(
[05:54] <kiko> somerville32, indeed it is!
[05:54] <MagicFab> somerville32, the bug is > 6 mo. old
[05:55] <somerville32> kiko: But we got semi-quasi official support from Canonical - unlike other distros.
[05:55] <MagicFab> somerville32, actually, no official support from Canonical for Xubuntu
[05:55] <MagicFab> I mean " commercial, paid "  support. 
[05:56] <somerville32> MagicFab: I'm not talking about that kind of support.
[05:56] <somerville32> No they don't sell support for it
[05:56] <somerville32> But we are supported by Canonical
[05:56] <MagicFab> and I mean " official "  as in " does not exclude ' best effort'  "  ;)
[05:56] <somerville32> They already do everything else for us, why not monitor our mirrors?
[05:56] <MagicFab> somerville32, just clarifying
[05:57] <MagicFab> somerville32, I can' t answer that / would need to know what " monitor our mirrors "  means :)
[05:57] <somerville32> They have a mirror prober then does magic things with the mirrors
[05:57] <salgado> somerville32, that's not a trivial thing to do. the mirror prober depends on the publication records that are created when launchpad process the uploaded packages
[05:57] <somerville32> salgado: All our packages are in main
[05:58] <somerville32> So it shouldn't be a problem (?)
[05:59] <salgado> somerville32, ah, so you're talking only about release mirrors (the ones that contain the released cd images)?
[06:00] <somerville32> Yes. Our archives are the exact same as Ubuntu, Kubuntu, and Edubuntu's.
[06:02] <salgado> somerville32, then you just need to get the xubuntu images on releases.ubuntu.com
[06:02] <somerville32> They already are
[06:02] <salgado> are they?
[06:02] <somerville32> Yes, very much so :)
[06:02] <Znarl> Xubuntu images are on cdimage, not releases.ubuntu.com
[06:03] <salgado> ah, right
[06:03] <somerville32> right
[06:04] <somerville32> Znarl: Is there anyway to get Xubuntu on releases.ubuntu.com as well?
[06:06] <Znarl> somerville32 : I am not the right peron to answer that, I'll try to find out about it.
[06:06] <somerville32> Znarl, k, thanks
[06:07] <somerville32> salgado, So do we need it on releases.u.c or is cdimages.u.c fine?
[06:13] <salgado> somerville32, releases.u.c
[06:16] <Znarl> somerville32 : Can I suggest you join #ubuntu-devel and ask there about Xubuntu on releases.ubuntu.com?
[06:22] <somerville32> salgado, [13:22]  <cjwatson> somerville32: link added
[06:24] <Znarl> somerville32 : I think cjwatson is talking about a URL link pointing to Xubntu on http://releases.ubuntu.com/, not a link to help with launchpad.
[06:25] <somerville32> oh
[06:28] <somerville32> [13:26]  <cjwatson> erm, that will have to be resolved some other way - releases.u.c has a lot of mirrors with disk space constraints and I can't just arbitrarily add another flavour to it
[06:28] <somerville32> [13:26]  <somerville32> cjwatson, Who should I chat with?
[06:28] <somerville32> [13:27]  <cjwatson> somebody on #launchpad, maybe salgado
[06:30] <flacoste> SteveA: i'm ready for the call when you are
[06:31] <SteveA> flacoste: 
[06:32] <SteveA> flacoste: I just tried calling using skype
[06:32] <flacoste> SteveA: indeed, everything froze for 15 seconds
[06:32] <flacoste> SteveA: I'll try calling you
[06:45] <Ubugtu> New bug: #80278 in rosetta "Selecting an alternative language loses any translation unsaved" [Medium,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/80278
[06:49] <somerville32> salgado, kiko: ping: ^^
[06:50] <flacoste> kiko: ping
[06:50] <kiko> yes?
[06:58] <somerville32> kiko: cjwatson says that you guys need to put Xubuntu on releases.u.c
[07:00] <kiko> somerville32, there are a few confusions going on it seems. first, Launchpad as best as I know doesn't manage releases.ubuntu.com. second, this does not necessarily have to do with mirrors or mirror probing. third, I am not sure exactly what you are looking for :-)
[07:00] <somerville32> salgado said that it is required and if we could get it on releases.ubuntu.com that we could setup the mirror prober for Xubuntu
[07:04] <elmo> there's a lot of confusion going on
[07:05] <elmo> somerville32: releases.ubuntu.com is not going to contain xubuntu anytime soon - as colin already explained to you, it would need to be officially supported for it to be on there, and AFAICS that's not on anyone's roadmap anytime soon
[07:05] <elmo> somerville32: if your goal here is to have mirror probing for launchpad, then ask for that and stop focusing on releases.ubuntu.com
[07:05] <somerville32> That is my goal but salgado said that it must be on releases.ubuntu.com
[07:06] <elmo> that's not strictly true
[07:06] <somerville32> If it is not required, then yes, I would like to have mirror probing.
[07:06] <elmo> right now the mirror prober supports probing two types of mirror: archive and releases
[07:06] <salgado> as of now, it's required
[07:07] <salgado> we don't have plans to support probing cdimage mirrors (cdimage.u.c), so if somerville32 could get xubuntu into releases.u.c that'd automatically give us probing of xubuntu mirrors
[07:08] <elmo> salgado: that's not remotely viable
[07:08] <somerville32> elmo: Who would I have to talk to to see about getting Xubuntu "official status" like Kubuntu and Edubuntu?
[07:08] <salgado> then we have to consider probing cdimage mirrors
[07:08] <elmo> a) xubuntu isn't officially supported (and all of releases.ubuntu.com is), b) releases.ubuntu.com has space restraints that are already being pushed
[07:10] <elmo> somerville32: if your only goal here is getting mirror probes happening, official support is completely tangential
[07:10] <Ubugtu> New bug: #80283 in rosetta "Add a template for gnunet and gnunet-gtk" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/80283
[07:11] <elmo> somerville32: official support involves a large finacial commitment from Canonical - if you're going after that "because it gets you mirror probing" you're doomed from the get go
[07:12] <somerville32> elmo: I too would hope that I would have a better reason then that
[07:14] <elmo> but as to who you would talk to, I don't know honestly know sorry.  I guess you could start with Matt Zimmerman
[07:15] <somerville32> Thanks :) 
[07:15] <matsubara> carlos: re: the just reported bug ^. gnunet and gnunet-gtk are both universe packages, but it seems the upstream developer wants to adopt rosetta as the main translation tool. How do we handle cases like that?
[07:15] <somerville32> salgado, How much time would be required to support proving cdimages mirrors?
[07:16] <somerville32> *probing
[07:17] <matsubara> carlos: I was about to answer that report with my canned "sorry, rosetta does not support universe packages yet" response, but perhaps it's better if you comment on it.
[07:17] <carlos> matsubara: well, the solution is easy, import it as a product not in Ubuntu
[07:17] <carlos> matsubara: anyway, I will answer it
[07:19] <matsubara> thanks carlos 
[07:19] <carlos> matsubara: in fact, they are requesting for such import 
[07:26] <salgado> somerville32, we don't have any concrete plans for doing that, so I can't tell you how long it would take
[07:28] <matsubara> carlos: yeah, you're right, misread it. I thought they're requesting the templates for the ubuntu package.
[08:12] <carlos> see you!
[08:29] <mpt> Goooooooooooooooooooooood morning Launchpadders!
[08:44] <kiko> hey emptee
[08:57] <mpt> hi keekoe
[08:57] <salgado> mpt!
[08:58] <salgado> mpt, I had to do a small change on that email template you wrote to me yesterday, so that I can send it to team owners to talk about their teams
[09:00] <salgado> mpt, I changed the middle paragraph to https://devpad.canonical.com/~andrew/paste/filevoou0L.html, so that it doesn't refer to "you"
[09:08] <mpt> salgado, sorry, what was that link?
[09:09] <salgado> mpt, https://devpad.canonical.com/~andrew/paste/filevoou0L.html
[09:11] <kiko> mpt, remember back in the day when your IRC client used to highlight for empty words?
[09:14] <mpt> salgado, I can't remember anything different between that and what I suggested
[09:14] <mpt> oh, "this membership"?
[09:14] <mpt> kiko, yes
[09:15] <salgado> mpt, exactly, the 'this membership' part
[09:15] <mpt> why?
[09:16] <kiko> mpt, otherwise the text needs to vary for team memberships that are for teams versus for people.
[09:16] <kiko> and if the text needs to vary the implementation will get /really/ complicated
[09:16] <mpt> oh, fair enough
[09:16] <mpt> kiko, I upgraded from ShadowIRC to X-Chat
[09:16] <kiko> it's unfortunate but salgado and I couldn't find a way to avoid this nicely
[09:16] <mpt> once I figured out how to get X-Chat to append its logs to ShadowIRC's
[09:17] <mpt> so no more false positives
[09:25] <kiko> mpt, they were fun though.
[09:28] <mpt> They were scrumptious.
[09:30] <Ubugtu> New bug: #80309 in launchpad "Don't claim that non-LP distributions have no releases" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/80309
[09:35] <Ubugtu> New bug: #80311 in launchpad "Remove wrong package search for non-LP distributions" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/80311
[09:36] <kiko> I wish we didn't have to file those bugs :-(
[09:38] <mpt> You wish that Fedora used Launchpad? :-)
[09:39] <kiko> I wish we better handled non-LP distros.
[09:40] <mpt> Just by those bugs being fixed? Or do you have something grander in mind?
[09:45] <Ubugtu> New bug: #80315 in soyuz "Don't make claims about builds for non-LP distributions" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/80315
[10:12] <j-a-meinel> When registering a bugfix branch and linking it to the bug, does it send an email saying that there was an update on the bug?
[10:12] <j-a-meinel> Specifically, if you use something like: https://launchpad.net/bzr/+bug/55951/+addbranch
[10:13] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 55951 in bzr "error when trying to get branch status" [Medium,Confirmed]  
[10:50] <Ubugtu> New bug: #80336 in malone "Clarify meaning of bug listings for products/distributions that don't use Launchpad" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/80336
[11:05] <Ubugtu> New bug: #80340 in launchpad-support-tracker "Need ability to search all questions ever asked" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/80340