[12:33] <jenda> hehe
[12:55] <LarstiQ> mdke: btw, do you want a CC on that mail from/to danilo?
[12:59] <mdke> LarstiQ: no, that's ok
[01:00] <LarstiQ> k
[02:05] <alefteris> packages that are in universe dont get a project made automaticaly for them in launchpad?
[02:06] <alefteris> s/project/product
[02:18] <alefteris> also can i set a bug contact for a product?
[02:18] <alefteris> how?
[02:19] <LaserJock> I know how to do it for a package
[02:19] <LaserJock> but not sure about a product
[02:26] <mdke> I think it might be Maintainer
[02:27] <alefteris> i tryed to triage a bug for tidle (that lives in universe), but when tryed to link it to upstream i got a page saying that there is no product named tilda in launchpad. So I created on in: https://launchpad.net/tilda/
[02:28] <mdke> strange system. I would have thought you can link to an upstream bugtracker without creating a product
[02:32] <alefteris> mdke, i had the same thought, that's why i wasnt so sure about making one
[02:32] <alefteris> i though every package had a product assigned to it
[02:33] <mdke> no, not all packages use launchpad at all
[02:33] <mdke> some have products created for internal launchpad reasons, but many don't, I think
[02:33] <alefteris> but maybe because its in universe it hasnt got one?
[02:33] <mdke> I'm not sure how it works, unfortunately launchpad's handling of upstream vs downstream is very confusing at the moment
[02:34] <somerville32> They changed how it works
[02:34] <somerville32> You are now required to create a product to link to a remote bug tracker
[02:35] <alefteris> ok i did that. But how can i set the Bug contact for it? 
[02:35] <mdke> surely if it uses an upstream bugtracker, you don't have bugs on the product in launchpad
[02:36] <mdke> so you shouldn't have a bug contact, I guess
[02:36] <somerville32> alefteris, You now need to associate the source package with the bazaar branch of the product
[02:37] <somerville32> or sorry: *series
[02:38] <somerville32> And when you create the product, you can also associate an upstream bugtracker (Though it doesn't seem to make a difference when actually adding a remote bug watch)
[02:38] <somerville32> You still have to provide the full link
[02:38] <somerville32> IIRC
[02:38] <somerville32> It is an interesting workflow, for sure
[02:38] <alefteris> i linked to the remote bug tracker: https://launchpad.net/tilda/
[02:39] <alefteris> im not sure how to do the bazzar thing :(
[02:39] <somerville32> You do it mean you associate the package with the product
[02:39] <somerville32> You don't actually associate the package with the product, you associate it with a release series
[02:40] <alefteris> also i have to notify upstream maintainers and transfer maintenance to them? 
[02:40] <somerville32> no
[02:43] <alefteris> ok i dont know how to do that correctly.. is there any documentation for this? I am afraid I will do something wrong and mess the packages :)
[02:43] <somerville32> You can't screw anything up
[02:44] <somerville32> Besides, if you do, the launchpad admins will just eat you
[02:44] <somerville32> and we'll never hear from you again
[02:44] <somerville32> So it's all good
[02:44] <mikl> :D
[02:45] <alefteris> hehe good to hear that
[02:46] <alefteris> so what should i put in name the unix name together with release number?
[02:46] <alefteris> like: tilda-0.09.3 ??
[02:48] <somerville32> ...
[02:48] <somerville32> what are you doing? :P
[02:48] <alefteris> there is a truck series already, why should I make a separate series?
[02:48] <alefteris> sorry havent done it before..
[02:48] <alefteris> ;P
[02:49] <somerville32> You *shouldn't* make a separate series
[02:49] <alefteris> ok i didnt
[02:50] <alefteris> you said before that i should: associate the source package with the bazaar branch of the product, sorry: *series
[02:51] <somerville32> Right
[02:51] <somerville32> Don't create a new one
[02:51] <somerville32> One already exists
[02:51] <alefteris> so im set
[02:54] <alefteris> thanks for the help
[02:55] <somerville32> np
[02:55] <somerville32> Happy launchpadding
[05:04] <Rinchen> somerville32, lol  Launchpad admins eating you 
[05:04] <somerville32> ;] 
[11:02] <tsmithe> could someone tell me about fix-it-friday?
[11:18] <mpt> tsmithe, Fix-It Friday is where the Launchpad developers stop working on big features and instead fix small problems that have been annoying people for a while.
[11:19] <mpt> You're welcome to suggest your own small problems for Fix-It Friday on the launchpad-users@ mailing list.
[11:19] <tsmithe> ahh ok
[11:19] <tsmithe> that's great
[11:19] <tsmithe> hi Hobbsee
[11:20] <Hobbsee> hey tsmithe!
[04:46] <ryanakca> why does https://code.launchpad.net/~ryanakca/+branch/+junk/vareac say "Launchpad could not mirror this branch at 2007-01-21 10:40:29 EST.  The error was: Not a branch: /srv/sm-ng/push-branches/00/00/09/3e/"... and does +junk/ ever get cleaned up?
[04:49] <ryanakca> (I last commited to it sometime in late November, early December, btw)
[07:21] <mpt> ryanakca, you'll have most luck asking that question when ddaa (David Allouche) is around
[07:22] <ryanakca> mpt: kk, thanks
[07:22] <mpt> Though you could make a support request at https://launchpad.net/launchpad-bazaar/+tickets
[07:29] <mpt> and on a related note
[07:29] <mpt> Gooooooooooooooooooooooooood morning Launchpadders!
[07:30] <mpt> Any day now, I will start remembering that it's 2007, not 2006
[07:34] <ryanakca> lol
[07:34] <ryanakca> mpt: kk, will do :)
[08:59] <gouki> Hi. Is it possible to edit a comment made on a bug?
[09:14] <mdke> gouki: no
[09:14] <mpt> no
[09:15] <mpt> What's the situation? Did you make a typo or language error, or is it something more serious?
[09:16] <kiko> third request
[09:21] <mpt> kiko, hmmm?
[09:21] <kiko> for a comment edit
[09:21] <kiko> gouki?
[09:21] <mpt> oh
[09:21] <mpt> I have a cunning idea about that, actually
[09:22] <mpt> because we don't send out mail notifications until five minutes later
[09:22] <mpt> we could give people five minutes to say "augh! that wasn't really what I meant"
[09:22] <kiko> and?
[09:23] <mdke> they can still do that... by commenting again :)
[09:23] <ajmitch> and have a big clock counting down, flashing red? :)
[09:23] <mdke> it's only a problem if they paste their root password in, or divulge a cia secret or something
[09:23] <crimsun> a big notification bubble with a countdown timer just for mpt?
[09:24] <mpt> mdke, or insult someone horribly
[09:24] <mdke> mpt: that happens?
[09:24] <kiko> mdke, we would need to erase every single comment by iwj
[09:24] <mdke> lol
[09:25] <mdke> kiko: only on Launchpad bugs, surely
[09:25] <kiko> I think insulting comments should instead go to a hall of fame
[09:25] <kiko> <Induct this comment to the Insult Hall Of Fame>
[09:25] <mdke> lol
[09:25] <kiko> and /bugs/+insult-hof
[09:25] <mpt> +what-did-hof-do-to-deserve-such-insults
[09:26] <mpt> or /+insult-hof, /+annoy-hof, and /+Hassel-hof
[09:27] <kiko> the latter one would be for hellen
[09:44] <gouki> kiko and mpt: Sorry, I was away
[09:44] <kiko> gouki, ok we forgive you this once, but your 5 minutes are up
[09:44] <gouki> It's actually a typo, but it's no big deal.
[09:44] <kiko> ah! that's not so bad
[09:45] <gouki> kiko: Yeah. Thanks though.
[09:50] <Ubugtu> New bug: #80895 in malone "Give people five minutes to edit/delete their comment" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/80895
[10:21] <Rinchen> mpt, I prefer /+dev/null
[10:23] <Rinchen> =)
[11:14] <ryanakca> Is there a limit to how many bazaar branches you can store on launchpad?
[11:38] <mpt> ryanakca, probably after a few billion the database will get a bit flaky
[12:14] <kiko-afk> mpt, you are so cute