[01:44] <kmc> hellow
[01:44] <kmc> question
[01:44] <kmc> not sure if this is the right place
[01:45] <kmc> but does anybody know if we will get updated fuse modules
[01:45] <kmc> to fix this bug
[01:45] <kmc> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3752
[02:52] <zul> cool...i have my security clearance now..
[02:52] <zul> i can go see if area 51 is true
[02:54] <kylem> they had to move it because of you.
[02:54] <zul> dang it
[03:40] <CanadianMan> hello there
[03:41] <CanadianMan> i came here cuz #ubuntu seemed a little over crowded and i think i might beable to get my question answered here
[03:49] <CanadianMan> is anyone here answering questions?
[03:50] <gnomefreak> ubuntulog: this is not a support channel
[03:50] <gnomefreak> damn
[03:50] <CanadianMan> opps my fault
[03:50] <gnomefreak> CanadianMan: this is not a support channel
[03:50] <CanadianMan> sorry
[04:31] <n0u> is the lastest 2.6.20-5.7 fixed against rpc/krb oops ? (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/483786/focus=484322)
[04:36] <n0u> btw linux-image-2.6.20-* should depends/recommends iptables 1.3.6+ (because of the netfilter changes in .20-rc)
[04:37] <fabbione> nope it doesn't need to either Depends or Recommends
[04:37] <n0u> for ex, using a efty 2.6.20 linux image on edgy (with its 1.3.5 iptables) doesn't work well, -m owner doesn't not work
[04:38] <fabbione> you are not supposed to mix stuff.. and we don't support partial upgrades
[04:38] <fabbione> either your run edgy or you run feisty
[04:38] <n0u> ok i shouldn't use a efty kernel on edgy :)
[04:39] <n0u> anyway, the most important thing is that you take trond's patch into consideration :)
[04:39] <n0u> i'll find a way to have a recent kernel/iptables on edgy on my own :)
[06:12] <jwendell> is true that feisty kernel recognizes ide as sata?
[06:12] <jwendell> s/sata/scsi
[06:14] <jwendell> like says https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/76194
[06:15] <jwendell> BenC, is that true?
[07:19] <Opu> .
[10:17] <tepsipakki> can someone confirm if dapper kernel supports Intel 82573E gigabit ethernet OOTB?
[10:24] <tepsipakki> at least the driver (e1000) mentions it, so I guess it's supported
[10:29] <tepsipakki> I'll just advice the local math department to get Fujitsu Esprimos with those instead of the still non-working Broadcom :)