[12:30] nothing useful that i can tell in the 2.0+0 version. i have 9 threads but still no symbols found but more info than no debugging symbols [12:30] im gonna upload the one i got done tonight [12:35] New bug: #83653 in firefox (main) "pdf download in gmail close firefox" [Undecided,Unconfirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/83653 === gnomefreak gone again [12:42] gnomefreak: have you succeeded to retrace a report from a current firefox? [12:42] yes im gonna split it up and upload it [12:42] good [12:42] as soon as i figure out where to split it but that should be easy [12:43] 34.5 mb [12:46] stack trace would be nice :) [12:53] procmaps is large [12:59] ok got 3 uploaded so far [01:03] do you want the long ass coredump? [01:04] stacktrace is uploaded :) [01:06] all files uploaded now. [01:07] oops thats not the full coredump but i dont hink you need it anyway === gnomefreak out for dinner [01:55] hmmm unfortunately trace does not have line numbers :( [01:55] hmm [01:55] have to go to bed .... n8 [02:01] gnomefreak: one more ... does it make a difference if you run with firefox-dbg package installed (in addition to what apport-retrace installs) [02:52] ill try in the morning [02:56] pitti;s repo needs updating i can finally confirm that === asac_ [n=asac@debian/developer/asac] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [11:59] New bug: #71377 in mozilla-thunderbird (main) "Sent item message text won't initially display in preview pane for messages with attachments" [Low,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/71377 [12:58] anyone awake ? [01:23] yeah sort of [01:25] New bug: #41076 in firefox "GSSAPI unavailable, missing library" [Medium,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/41076 [01:29] gnomefreak: how is your gf doing? getting better? [01:30] she eh [01:30] shes still feeling sick but nothing as bad as yesterday. shes getting color back in her face [01:32] be back in a bit i have to get coffee so i can make it :( [01:32] iim trying retrace while im gone [01:36] coffee in a good idea... [01:37] :) === asac almost eats coffee ;) === Admiral_Chicago will grab a cup in a few [01:50] gnomefreak: did you mark the gtk_style_realize bugs as duplicates? [01:50] bug 81978 is another one ... and probably the one with the best info attached [01:50] Malone bug 81978 in firefox "[apport] firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV in raise() | gtk_style_realize " [Undecided,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/81978 [02:07] can we currently see all bugs that have not been active for a certain amount of time (e.g. 30 days) ? [02:07] i don't think so, hmmm [02:09] no [02:10] maybe a wishlist bug for launchpad then :) [02:11] yes I've been looking for that for a while [02:11] but I guess its already posted. I will raise this issue. The launchpad developers appeared keen to help us last time I talked to them === Admiral_Chicago is still miffed at LP team. [02:12] actually we have one of the most complex packages and we are a good example how complex bug workflows might look like [02:12] Admiral_Chicago: why? [02:12] the whole Karma thing. [02:12] any problems in recent history ;) ? [02:12] ahh .... karma-whore you are ;) [02:13] they completly threw out about a week of my work when they reduced the Karma [02:13] hmmm ... maybe an accident [02:13] there have been users like pitti that had karma numbers so high you couldn't even read them :) [02:14] so there was a need to do something about that i guess [02:14] probably, but I was hoping to apply for membership soon and now I look like a jabroni imo [02:14] AlexLatchford: you should consider membership soon as well :) [02:15] New bug: #83750 in firefox (main) "mailto protocol not supported in firefox" [Undecided,Unconfirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/83750 [02:16] I don't think that karma will be a problem in regards to membership. People new the scale before ... and now they get used to what karma means with the new scale :) [02:16] s/new/knew/ [02:17] yes, I may add my name to the next meeting. [02:18] Not just yet, I have only been around on the scene for 3 months or so [02:18] need to do a little more work [02:18] :) [02:19] ah I've been around since Breezy, started developing around end of Dapper [02:20] I started using Ubuntu at Breezy, but didnt really start helping until Edgy came out [02:22] ok ... i am out for some lunch === Admiral_Chicago leaves for class. gettting that cup of coffee... [02:24] New bug: #68456 in mozilla-thunderbird "Ctrl-Shift-K bound to 2 functions in Compose" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/68456 [02:44] asac: no i didnt [02:48] asac: i believe that all the ?? in the traces is from bug in feisty. [02:50] asac: also did you ping pitti about issues with apport &/or his repo needing updating? if not i will ping him later === gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [02:58] gnomefreak: actually I talked to him yesterday, but not about the edgy issues with apport nor with his repo [02:58] so feel free to do [02:58] k [03:12] asac: i just did apt-cache policy on firefox-dbgsym in edgy and it is wrong version this might be the cause of it (atleast leaning that way) [03:13] wonders if using pittis feisty repo will help but i doubt it [03:14] if in feisty is the same version ... then there is at least a chance [03:15] asac: but everything else outside of firefox will be different including depends but pitti isnt here atm so i cant ask him [03:15] so at this point im installing everything i didnt have like java and flash [03:16] maybe a build-dep too [03:18] n [03:18] hmmm try to install firefox-dbg too and see if it yields better symbols (including line-numbers and variables) [03:18] it already is [03:18] ah ok [03:18] no line numbers [03:19] i see alot of ?? int he stacktrace [03:19] bug? [03:19] assuming that is where line numbers should be [03:19] it is on feisty not on edgy though afaik [03:21] other than pittis debug repo being out dated (atleast with ff) and wrong version of apport im running low on ideas here but i will work as much as i can on it today and ill try to get upstairs to try the patch [03:21] gnomefreak: look at stacktrace of bug 81978 [03:21] Malone bug 81978 in firefox "[apport] firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV in raise() | gtk_style_realize " [Undecided,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/81978 [03:21] thats how it should look like ... if perfect [03:21] k [03:22] gnomefreak: if you are stuck ... maybe go through bug reports and add the retrace tag to it where appropriate :) ... maybe we should suspend the retracing until we know how to properly do it [03:22] line numbers you mean the #5 part of it? [03:22] http://librarian.launchpad.net/5911445/Stacktrace.txt [03:23] im looking at it [03:23] there you see line number for all methods that belong to mozilla [03:23] e.g. [03:23] #1 [03:23] at nsProfileLock.cpp:206 [03:23] then there are even stack variables filled in ... which are really helpful to see what went wrong [03:23] ok [03:23] like [03:23] styles = (GSList *) 0x0 [03:23] in #4 [03:24] i get things like #2 0x0805b2cc in ?? () from /usr/lib/firefox/firefox-bin [03:24] see the ?? [03:25] its missing symbols maybe [03:25] yes those are missing symbols [03:26] or compiler optimizations [03:26] that could be because pittis repo uses 2.0+0dfsg-0ubuntu3 instead of 2.0.0.1 [03:26] for the firefox-dbgsym: package [03:26] hmm [03:27] but why do we need firefox-dbgsym if we have firefox-dbg installed? [03:27] maybe try to not pass -d option ? [03:27] apport uses dbgsym from what i can tell [03:27] all the warnings are on dbgsym not dbg [03:28] maybe pitti made it to look at his repo? === gnomefreak guesses [03:28] yes ... if you use -d [03:28] ah i dont need the -d? [03:28] -d means "download dbgsym" afaik [03:29] don't know what happens without them though :) ... but maybe worth a try [03:29] k ill try without it im gonna start clean redownload the report [03:40] should i stick with flash 7 or should i grab flash 9 from backports for the debugging [03:42] depends on what the user had :) [03:42] probably try the non-backports first [03:43] i am [03:43] i wish it would tell me somehow what versions of what he had [03:45] hmm [03:48] some have version info encoded as sonames (es extension to the .so files)? [03:48] http://librarian.launchpad.net/5911443/ProcMaps.txt [03:48] e.g. look at /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0.1200.9 [03:48] or usr/lib/libXft.so.2.1.2 [03:48] maybe there is such version info for flash too? [03:54] ill look asap [03:58] New bug: #58808 in flashplugin-nonfree (multiverse) "Flash stalls on install freezing synaptic" [Medium,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/58808 [04:02] ok running it witho0ut the -d [04:09] #7 0xb7e9f369 in MarkGCThingChildren (cx=0x9e69700, thing=0xa266900, [04:09] its fixed [04:09] nice [04:09] line numbers too? [04:09] #8 0xb7e9f81d in js_MarkGCThing (cx=0x9e69700, thing=0xa266900) [04:09] at jsgc.c:2471 [04:09] flagp = (uint8 *) 0x0 [04:09] thats all of #8 [04:09] suberp ... you rock :) [04:09] :) [04:10] so we need full -dbg package instead of dbgsym ? [04:10] ok its large [04:10] yes and forget the -d [04:10] you can do the apport-unpack to split it up in pieces [04:10] apport-retrace file [04:10] and only attach stacktrace for now [04:10] oh cool [04:10] apport-unpack file? [04:11] Usage: /usr/bin/apport-unpack [04:11] i got that too when trying to run it :( [04:12] hehe ... so a double check :) [04:12] apport-unpack file whate3ver/dir/i/want [04:12] right [04:12] seems i have to do something else [04:12] ill try making a folder for it i guess [04:16] you want all 3 stacks? [04:16] yeah folder might need to exist [04:17] 3? [04:17] there s astacktrace stacktracetop and threadstacktrace [04:17] theres a stacktrace .... [04:17] yes attach all for now :) ... maybe we can reduce this to just stacktrace by default later [04:17] k === Ubugtu [n=bugbot@ubuntu/bot/ubugtu] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [04:19] uploaded :) [04:19] let me know if thats all and i will continue i hope [04:20] btw apport-unpack splits them up into maybe 15 files [04:20] make that 21 files [04:24] bug? [04:25] bug 47564 [04:25] Malone bug 47564 in firefox "closes when scrolling" [Medium,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/47564 [04:36] New bug: #63230 in firefox (main) "firefox crash after opening totem in a tab" [Medium,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/63230 === gavins is now known as gavin [04:40] gnomefreak: well done ... you can remove the retrace tag then and add a traced tag instead ... which means that I will look at the trace and see what is next [04:41] next time we only need stacktrace and threadstracktrace .... topstacktrace does not look particulary useful :) [04:41] ah ... maybe one should add info which crash report the trace comes from [04:42] e.g. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/47564/comments/4 [04:42] Malone bug 47564 in firefox "closes when scrolling" [Medium,Needs info] [04:42] in this case [04:43] looking [04:44] sounds good but how do we get people to comment like that :P [04:44] like what? [04:44] oh you mean like when i upload it comment that it is from crash report [04:45] yes [04:45] there are some reports [04:45] New bug: #69147 in firefox (main) "Firefox crash report" [Medium,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/69147 [04:45] the stacktraces i gave last are for adams [04:45] where multiple people post reports too [04:45] they might be unrelated [04:45] sorry forgot to add that [04:45] so it is helpful to know to which report they are related [04:46] im also going through and asking them for a crash report on newest version of ff in edgy [04:47] if they are using 2.0+0 if i dont get an answer i will go back and try to downgrade my ff and see if it works but i would rather have the newest version crash report so we know it wasnt fixed in 2.0.0.1 [04:47] yes ... first ask if they can still reproduce ... if not make a retrace with their version ... so we might be able to confirm that it was fixed upstream or something [04:48] if we find this too time-consuming we can decide to just close unreproducible crash reports. [04:48] however this should only be done as the last resort :) [04:48] agreed [04:49] bummer ... somehow have to write down all these tiny details somewhere :) [04:49] can i reassign but 47564 [04:50] bug 47564 [04:50] Malone bug 47564 in firefox "closes when scrolling" [Medium,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/47564 [04:50] asac: we can update the wikis we already have but we need people to get latest crash report than maybe assign it to me for retrace for now [04:50] now that i got it working right i can do a few a day i think [04:53] ok ... I will try to think about a tag ... maybe just a "getcrashreport" tag for bugs that need up to date crash reports? [04:53] sounds good to me [04:54] or badreport .... to indicate that there is either no, an incomplete or an outdated (for now) report attached? [04:56] badreport sounds kind of bad [04:56] ok then ... needreport :) [04:56] works [04:57] ok ... make use of it if you find such a report ... I will add "needreport" and "traced" to the wiki (later today) [04:58] running another one atm but again i need one updated :( [04:58] can we add 2 tags? [04:58] sure [04:58] keep [04:58] retrace [04:58] and just add needreport [04:58] of course general status should be "Needs Info" for those reports [05:00] apport takes alot of cpu :( [05:01] grrrrr [05:01] apport giving damn errors again let me see what i can do [05:02] AssertionError [05:02] hmm sounds bad :/ [05:03] yes very [05:04] more bad news. i dont think you can add more tags. it brings up the tag itself to either remove it or change it [05:05] Traceback (most recent call last): [05:05] File "/usr/bin/apport-retrace", line 292, in ? [05:05] report.write(out) [05:05] File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/problem_report.py", line 141, in write [05:05] assert v.find('\n\n') < 0 [05:05] AssertionError [05:05] thats full error [05:06] ha and its tag tag [05:10] what ... just one tag? [05:10] per report [05:10] bad [05:11] let me try :) ... bug? [05:11] yeah [05:11] you need to separate tags by space :) [05:11] :) [05:11] https://launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/15179 [05:11] Malone bug 15179 in firefox "Users should be discouraged from editing temporary files" [Medium,Confirmed] [05:12] you know how I can easily navigate to the Ubuntu bug from there? [05:12] do i still need my dir. for bug 47564 [05:12] Malone bug 47564 in firefox "closes when scrolling" [Medium,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/47564 [05:12] yeah i added a tag to bug 69147 [05:12] Malone bug 69147 in firefox "Firefox crash report" [Medium,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/69147 [05:14] for but 47564 ... just replace tag by 'traced' and reassign to team [05:14] can i get rid of my dir that i was working in or do you still need files? [05:15] don't need them ... if it is really hard to redo in case we really need more you might consider to keep it somewhere [05:15] case = unlikely [05:16] asac: its not too bad now that we got it working [05:17] if you nee di can retrace it but for now its gone [05:17] fine ... I don't think we need more [05:17] actually this stack looks familiar to me ... remember something like this being fixed in 2.0.0.1 === gnomefreak starting from old reports so it is possible [05:23] im wondering if this crash report is bad [05:24] im asking in -bugs if anyone has seen it [05:25] which crash ? [05:25] bug 69147 [05:25] Malone bug 69147 in firefox "Firefox crash report" [Medium,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/69147 [05:25] ? [05:25] yes === jwendell [n=wendell@ubuntu/member/wendell] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [05:25] f4hy's report [05:26] its a duplicate [05:26] you know this bug? [05:26] wait a sec [05:26] i processed it yesterday [05:27] :) [05:27] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/73536 [05:27] Malone bug 73536 in firefox "Firefox crashes on instant X server shutdown" [Medium,Needs info] [05:27] but its valid ... (if they are indeed the same) [05:27] wont know without the retrace will we? [05:27] actually it crashes when X is forcefully shutdown [05:27] and report is generated on next login [05:27] for that incident [05:29] yeah ... probably ... we should anyway ask if he forcefully shutdown his X server before [05:29] k [05:30] asked [06:09] filed a bug report on that error it looks like its his crash report === asac is temporarily away [06:16] be back in 50 min [06:16] k [07:01] ok if anyone needs a retrace for imporant bugs let me know ill be working on older bugs but i can always fit one in :) === gnomefreak might be retracting that statement :( [07:12] lets see how new apport works [07:21] asac: new comment from one of the reporters on bug 69147 (what would you like to do with this one?) [07:21] Malone bug 69147 in firefox "Firefox crash report" [Medium,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/69147 [07:27] god i hope your kidding on bug 45008 [07:28] Malone bug 45008 in firefox "Firefox Crashes on Saving Files" [Medium,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/45008 [07:30] will look in a secons [07:30] d [07:31] asac: we have issues im gonna upload stack for bug and i would like you to see if that is enough. im getting that error still and its not finishing [07:32] yeah ... apparently bug 45008 is a dupe. god guess I guess :-P [07:32] Malone bug 45008 in firefox "Firefox Crashes on Saving Files" [Medium,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/45008 [07:32] ups [07:32] sorry i ment 69147 [07:32] :) [07:32] so where are you stuck? [07:34] apport is erroring nad not finishing [07:34] and* [07:34] look at stack uploaded to bug 69315 let me know if its enough [07:34] Malone bug 69315 in firefox "random crash" [Medium,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/69315 [07:35] looks fine ... yes. [07:35] so what about bug 45008 ? [07:35] Malone bug 45008 in firefox "Firefox Crashes on Saving Files" [Medium,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/45008 [07:35] kidding? [07:35] lots of crash reports [07:36] will look at them see if i cant get them done [07:36] yupp [07:36] there are even lots of duplicates [07:37] do you want all the dupes too? [07:37] named: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/45008/comments/16 [07:37] Malone bug 45008 in firefox "Firefox Crashes on Saving Files" [Medium,Needs info] [07:37] i dunno ... maybe I should go through them and look [07:38] if you get time go through them and lists what ones you want done adn i will see if i can do them [07:38] i will add retrace on them :) [07:38] there should be already plenty with that tag :) [07:39] hopefully ... i will do retraces too soon ... but not before I have finished lots of other work still here (e.g. repackaging firefox, thunderbird ...) :) [07:39] i see a few with 2.0+0 version (i have that one installed at the moment) and a few with 2.0.0.1 [07:40] asac: you work on what you need to i can handle the retraces for now [07:40] grr...network...bothers...me === hjmf [n=hjmf@87.Red-83-40-226.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [07:41] javascript...I hate it so much... [07:45] ok went throught he ones on 45008 and i will try to get 6 done theres one with no version i will see if i can get that one done too but not holding breath [07:45] Admiral_Chicago: just annoying .. or you hate to code it? [07:46] asac: i sent myself a link and I realize I don't understand %247cae%413 etc [07:46] i figured it out [07:47] hehe [08:01] ok just updated pyton-apport this should fix the errors (atleast i hope) === gnomefreak keeps forgetting to email david about reading cras reports :( [08:27] you already know how to do it :) [08:27] you see the stacktrace [08:27] you can go to the sources and their lines :) [08:27] and look whats wrong ... considering variables set to their values etc. === gnomefreak cant understand all the crypic stuff in stacktraces :( [08:30] New bug: #83827 in firefox (main) "firefox memory leak -> crash" [Undecided,Unconfirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/83827 [08:31] i did email him to look into it and bughelper. if we get cluefiles done for bughelper we can mark dupes very very easy [08:31] s/mark/find [08:32] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozilla-thunderbird/+bug/24220 [08:32] Malone bug 24220 in mozilla-thunderbird "mozilla-thunderbird: SMTP down negotiation weakness" [High,Confirmed] [08:32] hjmf: if i get time in the next few days ill run the retrace on bug 83194 [08:32] Malone bug 83194 in firefox "Firefox crashes when switching video mode at filecabi.net" [Undecided,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/83194 [08:32] Anyone got any info on this? [08:34] lookijng\ [08:34] you know what i mean [08:35] looks like if its not fixed it just needs a rebuild [08:35] gnomefreak: Cool. Are you using edgy's or feisty's aport-retrace version? [08:36] i gather that froom mozilla and upstream its fixed but i might be wrong [08:36] hjmf: feistys with edgy chroot [08:36] i just updated it because i was getting errors [08:36] yeah gnomefreak I am not sure if this one has?# [08:36] I'll try it asap. Any other hints to avoid errors? [08:37] pray [08:37] lol [08:37] lol [08:37] hjmf: dont use the -d flag [08:37] and tee it off to a file other than that its working ok [08:38] are you running it directly to the crash file or to the unpacked report? [08:38] i havent run one since update of python-apport (that was in the traceback from the assertion error [08:38] directly to crash than unpacking it and just uploading stacktrace anf threadstacktrace [08:39] ok [08:39] its time consumming but without errors its nice :) btw cpu usage is high while running it [08:40] rrunning one now ill leet you know if it still errosr [08:43] I'm trying a test on edgy's patched apport, if I just only have ten minutes of free time :/ [08:43] gnomefreak: what do you want to do about the bug I linked? [08:45] no succeed :( [08:45] apport-retrace _usr_lib_firefox_firefox-bin.1000.crash -o out.crash [08:46] diff <(sed -n '1,/^CoreDump:/ {p;}' out.crash) <(sed -n '1,/^CoreDump:/ {p;}' _usr_lib_firefox_firefox-bin.1000.crash) [08:46] no differences [08:46] AlexLatchford: not sure yet. i think it just needs a rebuild (i havent finished working on building ff or tb since im on apport-retrace [08:46] hjmf: use feistys :) [08:47] I give up, I'll use feistys :) [08:47] but tomorrow [08:47] see you [08:48] i just do a simple apport-retrace file 2>&1 | tee debuginfo [08:48] new python-apport fixed it i think [08:49] oh that cant be good :( [08:51] hjmf: you might want to wait a minute before doing onee [08:52] im unpacking it now but looks like not everything was done [08:57] asac: might have found another bug in apport can you please take a look at the 2 files i uploaded to bug 45008 [08:57] Malone bug 45008 in firefox "Firefox Crashes on Saving Files" [Medium,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/45008 [08:57] running another on someone elses to see if it is the report or apport [08:58] oh crap [08:59] hjmf: also install the -dbg package for ff [08:59] im wondering if i need gtk crap [09:04] gnomefreak: what makes you think that there is a bug in apport? [09:04] installing gtk dbg package might help to get more symbols [09:04] still alot of ?? and in some of the parts of the report there are no symbols looks the same as the one i downloaded :( [09:06] yeah ... the ?? are normal I guess [09:06] thats how stacktraces look like :) [09:07] maybe its somewhere in the kernel user-space api for which you have no symbols [09:11] ah ok. im looking for all the gtk-dbg i can find would you like a rerun on that one? [09:12] not needed ... for now :) [09:13] thx [09:15] np [09:23] btw, if you ask users to test if problem disappears without extensions et al, ask them to run [09:23] firefox -safe-mode [09:23] thats easier [09:23] probably worth a wiki entry :) [09:23] k [09:29] anyone feel like building thunderbird for AlexLatchford ? [09:31]