[02:27] <ubotu> In ubotu, jrib said: no hostname is should mention the gui way to change the hostname permanently:  system > administration > networking  "General" tab
[02:30] <PriceChild> !hostname
[02:30] <ubotu> Use hostname <somehostname> to set the hostname, or to do it permanently: edit /etc/hostname  and /etc/hosts . WARNING! Make sure that /etc/hostname and /etc/hosts match, otherwise sudo may not work properly
[02:31] <PriceChild> does the networking one actually change your whole hostname?
[02:31] <jrib> "whole hostname"?
[02:32] <PriceChild> i mean your "real" hostname...
[02:32] <PriceChild> I thought it only changed it for the outside world's image... although I'm probably wrong :)
[02:33] <PriceChild> Uuu I just tried it and I'm wrong :)
[02:33] <jrib> I didn't know you could do that to be honest, but yes I believe it has the same effect as editing /etc/hosts and /etc/hostname
[02:34] <PriceChild> Use hostname <somehostname> to set the hostname, or to do it permanently: edit /etc/hostname  and /etc/hosts . WARNING! Make sure that /etc/hostname and /etc/hosts match, otherwise sudo may not work properly. Alternatively, use the gui at system>administration>networking on the "General" tab
[02:34] <PriceChild> whoops
[02:34] <PriceChild> !no hostname is <reply> Use hostname <somehostname> to set the hostname, or to do it permanently: edit /etc/hostname  and /etc/hosts . WARNING! Make sure that /etc/hostname and /etc/hosts match, otherwise sudo may not work properly. Alternatively, use the gui at system>administration>networking on the "General" tab
[02:34] <ubotu> I'll remember that PriceChild
[02:34] <jrib> PriceChild: thanks
[02:35] <PriceChild> no problem :)
[02:40] <Hobbsee> SportChick: no
[02:40] <Hobbsee> SportChick: thanks
[02:41] <PriceChild> strange entrance... :)
[02:42] <Hobbsee> hey PriceChild
[02:42] <Hobbsee> PriceChild: she noticed me
[02:43] <PriceChild> hehe i guessed :)
[02:49] <Mez> ^lart Hobbsee
[02:49] <Mez> @lart Hobbsee
[02:49] <SD-Plissken> PriceChild your everywhere.. lol
[02:49] <Hobbsee> @lart Mez
[02:50] <PriceChild> how do you spank someone with a tutu...
[02:50] <SD-Plissken> lol
[02:51] <Mez> PriceChild, lol - i like being spanked thoguh
[02:52] <PriceChild> i didn't want to know Mez :)
[02:54] <Hobbsee> Mez: is just crazy
[02:54] <Mez> i like spanking more though
[02:54] <Hobbsee> more than?
[02:55] <SportChick> Hobbsee: actually, I memo'd you
[02:56] <Mez> more than being spanked
[02:57] <Hobbsee> SportChick: sorry, yes.
[02:57] <kgoetz> PriceChild: perhaps Mez is in the tutu, not spanked withit
[02:57] <Mez> kgoetz, only on weekends
[02:58] <kgoetz> Mez: naturally
[02:58] <PriceChild> kgoetz, I still don't want to picture that either :)
[02:58] <Mez> PriceChild, why not?  :(
[02:58] <Hobbsee> Mez: ah
[02:58] <kgoetz> PriceChild: aw, you hurt his feelings :(
[02:58] <kgoetz> (however, i do agree with you :P)
[02:59] <kgoetz> hi Hobbsee
[02:59] <Mez> kgoetz, :'(
[02:59] <kgoetz> Mez: </3
[02:59] <Hobbsee> hey kgoetz :)
[02:59] <kgoetz> *waves*
[03:00] <Mez> s/flame//
[03:00] <Mez> s/ant/ed/
[03:00] <Hobbsee> not from purple flames
[03:01] <kgoetz> error: no ed\n
[03:01] <Mez> Hobbsee, purple flames are my friends
[03:01] <Hobbsee> Mez: pink ones too?
[03:02] <kgoetz> Hobbsee: they go with his tutu
[03:02] <Mez> Hobbsee, ESPESCIALLY pink
[03:02] <Mez> all kinds of flames ;)
[03:02] <Mez> Hobbsee, that was a mere puddle
[03:03] <Hobbsee> you wish
[03:05] <Mez> I'm off to bed now
[03:05] <Hobbsee> bye Mez
[03:06] <Mez> Hobbsee, not joining me ? :P
[03:06] <Mez> oh, no
[03:06] <Mez> it's mid afternoon for you
[03:06] <Mez> :P
[03:06] <Mez> lol
[03:06] <Hobbsee> Mez: nope.  wouldnt anyway.
[03:07] <Hobbsee> it's 1pm, actually
[03:07] <Mez> Hobbsee, I was actually amking a reference to seperate beds
[03:07] <Mez> but ... meh
[03:07] <Hobbsee> Mez: oh really now?
[03:08] <Mez> Hobbsee, yes, as it was meant as a double entendre ;)
[03:09] <Hobbsee> heh
[03:09] <Mez> see, my mate walked into a bar the other day and asked for a double entendre
[03:09] <Mez> so the barman gave him one
[03:13] <Hobbsee> heh
[03:23] <Hobbsee> !ping
[03:23] <ubotu> pong
[06:11] <ubotu> In ubotu, frogzoo said: resize_ntfs is caution: gparted 0.1 does NOT play nice with resizing NTFS - best solution is to get a latest copy of garted 0.3 on usb, boot off a live cd, & run gparted from the usb - but by rights even this can fail, so any data you can't replace, backup.
[07:28] <Madpilot> samin on #ubuntu just earned himself 24hrs ban for deliberate /away spamming
[07:32] <Jucato> wow
[07:34] <jenda> deliberate?
[07:34] <jenda> good morning, btw.
[07:34] <Madpilot> morning, jenda - yes, it was deliberate. !language issues, too
[07:34] <jenda> ok
[07:34] <Madpilot> * samin is away: Oooh, my ass is chafing! I'll be back in a jiffy!
[07:34] <Madpilot> * samin is back (gone 00:00:05)
[07:34] <Madpilot> * Aardfox has quit ("Leaving")
[07:34] <Madpilot> * cstrippie has quit (Client Quit)
[07:34] <Madpilot> * samin is away: Oooh, my ass is chafing! I'll be back in a jiffy!
[07:34] <Madpilot> * samin is back (gone 00:00:04)
[07:34] <Madpilot> * samin is away: Oooh, my ass is chafing! I'll be back in a jiffy!
[07:35] <nalioth> gotta watch those deliberate /away spammers
[07:37] <jenda> ooh, Pelicano paid us a visit...
[07:43] <Madpilot> evidently he was too L337 to stay, tho ;)
[09:05] <nalioth> mneptok: so if it doesn't work, can i come and drop centipedes and ants in your underwear?
[09:06] <jenda> o.O
[09:07] <mneptok> nalioth: why would you thank me if it doesn't work?
[09:08] <nalioth> mneptok: i'm watching #ubuntu for your answer to my last question
[09:10] <mneptok> USB? WiFi? ugh.
[09:11] <mneptok> i have a suggestion. don't use USB for networking. :)
[09:13] <nalioth> not my equipment, i'm searching for a client requested solution
[09:14] <mneptok> nalioth: i frankly have no first hand experience, and so would be starting from scratch-
[11:37] <ubotu> In ubotu, mneisen said: !foo is bar
[11:37] <ubotu> In ubotu, mneisen said: !kernelheldback is <reply> Updates to linux kernel-related packages being held is a known issue. A fix is currently being worked on. Accepting or updating will do nothing, as no package will be installed or upgraded anyway. Please ignore the update notification for now. See https://launchpad.net/soyuz/+bug/83976 for reference/updates
[12:57] <hbaigu> hey, i don't have the router
[12:57] <hbaigu> it the first time i enter today
[12:58] <apokryphos> hbaigu: have you followed the instructions for fixing it?
[12:58] <hbaigu> i don't have the router
[12:59] <hbaigu> i don't have any router
[12:59] <apokryphos> the router/modem you are connecting through has a problem
[12:59] <apokryphos> you are obviously using a router/modem otherwise you wouldn't be on IRC
[12:59] <nalioth> apokryphos: older unpatched versions of mirc were affected by it, too
[12:59] <hbaigu> it happen, that i enter #ubuntu when the outher also entered
[01:00] <mneptok> apokryphos: telepathy > telephony
[01:00] <apokryphos> hbaigu: you can get around this by either getting a software upgrade for your router (if available) or by reconnecting on port 8001
[01:00] <hbaigu> i don't have any router
[01:00] <apokryphos> hbaigu: just set your client to reconnect on port 8001
[01:00] <hbaigu> soory, but i don't
[01:00] <apokryphos> ...
[01:00] <hbaigu> only adsl modem
[01:00] <apokryphos> as you are, you are vulnerable
[01:00] <mneptok> hbaigu: it could be your *modem*
[01:00] <apokryphos> hbaigu: hence router/modem
[01:01] <apokryphos> !dcc | hbaigu
[01:01] <ubotu> hbaigu: There are people around who think it is funny to abuse a bug in certain routers by sending invalid DCC commands. When bitten by this bug ops in #ubuntu remove users so they are no longer targets. To fix it have a look here: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/FixDCCExploit
[01:01] <hbaigu> i know
[01:01] <apokryphos> hbaigu: so reconnect on 8001, we will test you, and then you can rejoin
[01:02] <mneptok> !dcc > mneptok
[01:02] <mneptok> ohyes
[01:03] <hbaigu> but, i only haved the bad luck to enter #ubuntu, at the same time as the outhers
[01:03] <apokryphos> hbaigu: so reconnect on 8001, we will test you, and then you can rejoin
[01:08] <hbaigu> i am in the port 8001
[01:10] <Hobbsee> seems fine
[01:11] <Hobbsee> hbaigu: try joining?
[01:11] <hbaigu> i am there
[01:12] <apokryphos> good to go
[01:12] <hbaigu> but, i don't have any router, and i only had the bad luck to enter #ubuntu at the same when the outhers entered, it was my first time today that i connected to freenode
[01:13] <elkbuntu> you should probably register your nick as well
[01:13] <hbaigu> probably
[01:13] <apokryphos> hbaigu: hm, that looks to have been the case
[01:13] <apokryphos> You are right; I'm sorry about that.
[01:13] <PriceChild> better safe than sorry.
[01:14] <hbaigu> np
[01:41] <Hobbsee> @lart mneptok
[01:42] <elkbuntu> Hobbsee, you didnt hear the decree. mneptok must be larted with #37
[01:43] <Hobbsee> elkbuntu: true.
[01:43] <Hobbsee> Seveas: yes, LongPointyStick is me.  you find out if you check my alternate names (although it wasnt authed - that connection dropped from freenode a while ago, and didnt reidentify)
[02:19] <jrib> Hi, can I suggest that !fishing not have that thread at the end?
[02:19] <jrib> threat even
[02:19] <Hobbsee> !fishing
[02:19] <apokryphos> !fishing
[02:19] <ubotu> Please investigate with me only in /msg or in #ubuntu-bots (see also !Bot). Abusing the channel bots will only result in angry ops...
[02:19] <apokryphos> fishing is an alias for investigate
[02:21] <apokryphos> I don't really have any objection to it either way. Hobbsee?
[02:21] <Hobbsee> apokryphos: neither.   although, of course abuse will annoy channel ops, and if you keep doing it, will likely make them remove you, just to stop creating noise
[02:22] <jrib> or at least an alternative without it?
[02:23] <elkbuntu> jrib, pray tell, why do you want the string removed?
[02:24] <elkbuntu> jrib, if it annoys some people, then they're likely to be the type to be a PITA anyway
[02:25] <jrib> elkbuntu: well if someone is new to the channel and sees other people using the bot, it's natural to try to use the bot in the same way.  I'd like to just inform them that they can message the bot without the threat at the end.  I don't see the point in it.  Obviously, if they don't follow the rules the ops will get angry
[02:26] <elkbuntu> jrib, it's not a threat, it's a safety warning
[02:28] <jrib> elkbuntu: how come the other rule !factoids don't have the "safety warning"?  like !enter or !coc
[02:28] <elkbuntu> jrib, you're right. we should add warnings to those as well.
[02:28] <jrib> heh
[02:29] <apokryphos> I guess we can try it out for now and see people's response to it
[02:29] <apokryphos> if they don't "back off" after the factoid as it is, we can reconsider changing it back, I guess.
[02:29] <elkbuntu> apokryphos, a reword of the warning would be better than removing the string
[02:29] <apokryphos> what do you suggest?
[02:31] <elkbuntu> what about: Please investigate with me only in /msg or in #ubuntu-bots (see also !Bot). I am not a toy, and using me as such will be frowned upon by the ops.
[02:33] <apokryphos> hm, I dunno
[02:33] <apokryphos> I'm a real boy!
[02:33] <apokryphos> I think it might be good to try it without, and see how it goes
[02:33] <apokryphos> But I have to shoot off for a lecture; see you 8)
[02:34] <jrib> bye
[02:36] <jrib> elkbuntu: I guess what bothers me is that if the bot wasn't around I wouldn't mention the ops at all.  I would just let someone know that they should message the bot instead of spamming the channel.  But it was only a suggestion, I'll just setup my own bind if you feel people don't take it seriously without mentioning the ops
[03:05] <ubotu> In ubotu, erUSUL said: upgradeproblem is There is a problem with the latest linux-image-generic package (is broken as for now) it is a known bug that is being sorted out here: https://launchpad.net/soyuz/+bug/83976
[03:06] <elkbuntu> hmm... i guess it is worth it
[03:06] <elkbuntu> !upgradeproblem is There is a problem with the latest linux-image-generic package (is broken as for now) it is a known bug that is being sorted out here: https://launchpad.net/soyuz/+bug/83976
[03:06] <ubotu> I'll remember that, elkbuntu
[03:06] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 83976 in soyuz "-security vs. -updates/-proposed version comparison needs to be removed" [Critical,In progress] 
[03:07] <elkbuntu> other editors, feel free to remove that when the issue is resolved
[03:13] <Thunderbolt_> Hi. I got sent here as my router is vunerable to a DCC Exploit. I've read the instruction page and changed my connection port. And my router firmware is up to date
[03:13] <Thunderbolt_> what do I do next?
[03:14] <Hobbsee> Thunderbolt_: /join #thunderbolt
[03:33] <elkbuntu> hmmm is yipe banned in -offtopic or just muted?
[03:36] <jenda> muted, AFAIK
[03:36] <jenda> yup, muted.
[04:03] <LjL> are you getting PMs saying "by berkk_01", as well as german spam?
[04:04] <elkbuntu> not i
[04:06] <Hobbsee> LjL: who's it by?
[04:07] <LjL> Hobbsee: 85.101.118.182 85.99.137.81 81.214.42.249
[04:07] <LjL> nicks are useless as they change it as fast as lightning
[04:07] <Hobbsee> LjL: meant as in what nick
[04:07] <Hobbsee> ahhh
[04:07] <LjL> emalia cem_36 meliha anyway
[04:07] <Hobbsee> got one
[04:07] <Hobbsee> SportChick: ping?
[04:08] <Hobbsee> rob: ping?
[04:08] <LjL> i've already queried stats p
[04:08] <LjL> oh, now ^^BARIS too
[04:08] <LjL> ah same IP as meliha
[04:08] <elkbuntu> still nothing
[04:08] <Hobbsee> are they in #ubuntu?
[04:09] <LjL> yeah they join and part quickly
[04:09] <LjL> now ilknur
[04:09] <LjL> idents change less often
[04:09] <arualavi> hello everybody, my name is Iv and I'm from #ubuntu-cat
[04:09] <Hobbsee> LjL: what are they joining?
[04:10] <elkbuntu> hi arualavi
[04:10] <LjL> Hobbsee: weird... this IlkNur one didn't seem to join anything at all
[04:10] <LjL> the ones i checked had joined #ubuntu
[04:10] <Hobbsee> LjL: probably a spambot
[04:10] <Hobbsee> LjL: they were doing this yesterdya, too
[04:11] <LjL> though what's weird is that they only say "by berkk_01"
[04:11] <Hobbsee> yeah
[04:11] <LjL> well, the first of them spammed some porn, but the others didn't
[04:11] <Hobbsee> [02:11]  [Who]  berkk01Sciprt6 is n=gekolnv@85.99.137.81 (mustafa43_)
[04:11] <Hobbsee> [02:11]  [Whois]  berkk01Sciprt6 has been idle for 8 minutes and 34 seconds.
[04:11] <LjL> yes mustafa43_ is one of them, though the nick was different when he spammed me
[04:12] <Hobbsee> that's the only person on the /who list for berkk*
[04:12] <LjL> uhm, either i missed that /who before
[04:12] <Hobbsee>  /who berkk*
[04:12] <LjL> Hobbsee: sure, but the IP is the same as cem_36, who spammed me, so i should have seen the /who
[04:13] <elkbuntu> they're hitting up #debian as well it seems
[04:13] <LjL> either he wasn't online with that nick yet or i forgot to /who that one IP
[04:13] <Hobbsee> LjL: dunno
[04:13] <LjL> i probably just didn't /who
[04:14] <LjL> oh, the spam again... now it's in turkish, but same site
[04:14] <LjL> (well, actually the site was the old turkish one we already got acquainted with... even though the first message was in german)
[04:14] <elkbuntu> why do i always miss out on this fun?
[04:14] <LjL> elkbuntu: dunno, it's not quite clear to me how they target people
[04:15] <LjL> last time i just joined 5 or 6 clones with very different nicknames to gather as much spam as possible
[04:17] <Hobbsee> [02:16]  [Who]  berkk01Sciprt482 is n=buduo`@88.254.61.53 (HPwHk)
[04:17] <Hobbsee> is the new one
[04:26] <PriceChild> arualavi, hey, anything we could help you with?
[04:27] <arualavi> hi PriceChild, i only introduce myself
[04:27] <PriceChild> Ah ok
[04:29] <LjL> uh, i just received a VERSION from freenode
[04:29] <arualavi> PriceChild: hope to learn something to op #ubuntu-cat...
[04:30] <arualavi> PriceChild: is it the correct channel?
[04:30] <elkbuntu> LjL, still getting the messages?
[04:31] <LjL> elkbuntu: nope, they've stopped about when hobbsee left
[04:31] <elkbuntu> aha! hobbsee is to blame! :
[04:31] <LjL> the dark side of the hobbsee spammeth
[04:31] <PriceChild> arualavi, This is the home of Ubuntu operators, but not sure what you can learn from us... mostly learn by doing IMO :)
[04:32] <arualavi> PriceChild: ah ok ,thanks
[04:37] <SportChick> hob: pong?
[04:38] <LjL> SportChick: it was about the PM spam, i think
[04:38] <LjL> i've already bothered stats p about it anyway, and it seems to have stopped for me
[04:38] <SportChick> LjL: I just woke up, haven't read my backlog yet
[04:38] <SportChick> ok
[04:46] <apokryphos> aha, good to see +J survived the netsplit very well
[04:57] <Tm_T> apokryphos: +J ?
[04:57] <apokryphos> throttle
[04:57] <apokryphos> we had it disabled in #ubuntu until recently
[04:58] <Tm_T> Hmm, ok.
[05:03] <SportChick> good morning, folks
[05:04] <PriceChild> morning :)
[06:12] <ubotu> In #ubuntuforums, tsmithe said: ubotu, nick is <alias> nickspam
[06:12] <PriceChild> I think nick would be better off aliased to registering your nick...
[06:13] <Tm_T> PriceChild: Yup
[06:13] <Tm_T> !nickspam
[06:13] <ubotu> You should avoid changing your nick in a busy channel like #ubuntu - it causes unrequired scrolling which is unfair on new users. The same goes for using noisy away messages (see !Away for more details): use the command "/away <reason>" to set your client away silently
[06:13] <Tm_T> !nick
[06:13] <ubotu> Sorry, I don't know anything about nick - try searching on http://bots.ubuntulinux.nl/factoids.cgi
[06:13] <LjL> !nick is <alias> register
[06:13] <ubotu> I'll remember that, LjL
[06:53] <BearPerson> hrm, my bad
[06:56] <LjL> what?
[06:57] <BearPerson> I saw them come in, set #ubuntu +r, saw them head elsewhere, set it -r
[06:57] <BearPerson> didn't see them turn around and head in then
[06:57] <SportChick> Seveas or nalioth: you might want to set an onjoin message on -unregged saying to register and rejoin #ubuntu
[07:02] <Seveas> \o/ SportChick
[07:02] <SportChick> :)
[07:03] <SportChick> I suggested LjL do it, but only you and nalioth have sufficient access rights, Seveas
[07:03] <LjL> keep in mind that people read onjoin notices about as much as they read channel topics :P
[07:06] <SportChick> LjL: true, but it might get some of them :)
[07:14] <apokryphos> are we still under iminent threat? ;-)
[07:15] <apokryphos> *imminent
[07:17] <apokryphos> BearPerson: are they still around or is it safe to -r?
[07:17] <BearPerson> I guess -r should work again for now
[07:20] <apokryphos> Aysha: ok, you're good to go.
[07:20] <apokryphos> you can join #ubuntu directly now
[08:23] <SportChick> apokryphos: I'm not racing anyone - not in _this_ condition :)
[08:23] <apokryphos> what's that?
[08:24] <SportChick> apokryphos: I now have pneumonia, too :(
[08:24] <apokryphos> dang
[08:24] <SportChick> heh, that's what I said
[08:25] <apokryphos> how serious is it?
[08:26] <SportChick> apokryphos: http://www.kirkanddonna.com/donna/
[08:28] <apokryphos> short updates are never short :P
[08:29] <apokryphos> ack, broken shoulder? Yeah, infections cause it a lot of the time.
[08:29] <apokryphos> Sorry to hear :(
[08:29] <SportChick> apokryphos: yeah, it turned out longer than I thought
[08:29] <SportChick> I had lots of stuff to talk about but for _me_ that was rather short considering the content
[08:30] <apokryphos> not sure I could trust myself with a blog, really 8)
[08:30] <SportChick> apokryphos: hehe
[08:31] <SportChick> apokryphos: well, I sort of was used to it after our trip
[08:31] <apokryphos> might need to have one soon though for our master plan to slowly completely take over planetsuse.org
[08:31] <SportChick> basically journaled for a year with an accompanying (edited) version online
[08:31] <apokryphos> which is filled with a lot of Mono/GNOME guys advertisement nonense *shock*
[08:31] <PriceChild> Not to sway the topic too much, but I'm hearing that the edgy kernel issues are fixed...
[08:33] <apokryphos> cool
[08:35] <apokryphos> what exactly happened with Canonical's ircd?
[08:44] <jenda> Welcome P3L|C4N0
[09:24] <LjL> [21:23:16]  <hellmet> Dwonload The Offical Ubuntu book here http://ubuntuforums.info/showthread.php?p=745 <- #ubuntu
[09:24] <LjL> in the doubt, i banned... but just how illegitimate is that?
[09:29] <hellmet> Yes LjL..
[09:30] <hellmet> I didn't mean to spam the channel. I thought it would be helpful for users
[09:30] <LjL> hellmet: i'm presently trying to find out if the link you gave is something illegitimate or not... for i don't quite know what the official ubuntu book is, what its copyright and distribution status is, etc
[09:30] <LjL> hellmet: for sure, however, coming into a support channel and pasting a link out of the blue isn't contemplated by the channel guidelines, you understand
[09:30] <hellmet> you should have asked me once na. Its ok. Its legal to distribute etcetera.
[09:30] <hellmet> Oh k.
[09:31] <hellmet> I won't paste links again just like that.
[09:31] <hellmet> unless asked by someone .. sorry
[09:31] <LjL> hellmet: i'll take your word on it - at any rate, you see, we have tons of more or less useful links (in our bot for instance), but if everyone just posted random ones all the time, the channel wouldn't be quite... usable
[09:31] <LjL> hellmet: it's alright, i'll remove the ban in a second
[09:31] <hellmet> please unban me. I do love that channel a lot.. many a time, I just look at people's posts and learn stuff.
[09:32] <hellmet> Thank You ..
[09:34] <LjL> is this book actually legitimately available though? google points me to paper editions mostly
[09:42] <PriceChild> LjL, ubuntuforums.info ?
[09:43] <LjL> PriceChild: it says "ubuntuforums india" on the top PNG
[09:43] <PriceChild> LjL, Yeah just clicked.... hmm...
[09:45] <PriceChild> LjL, That download isn't legal is it...?
[09:46] <LjL> PriceChild, i dunno. reading the thread, they do claim it's CC licensed... i'll check out the PDF. assuming the PDF actually contains the real license
[09:47] <PriceChild> LjL, in the book it says This book is published under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 open publication
[09:47] <PriceChild> license, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/.
[09:49] <PriceChild> I'm not happy at all with ubuntuforums.info... They've copied our entire layout etc.
[09:49] <nalioth> LjL: you pushing the pR0nZ0rs in here? lolol
[09:49] <nalioth> PriceChild: join the club
[09:49] <PriceChild> lol :)
[09:51] <LjL> nalioth: no, i keep those for myself, i just give you the boring ones with ubuntu-related, if slightly irrelevant and possibly illegal, links :P
[10:15] <jenda> Very interesting catch, BTw.
[10:53] <Hoosteen> ok..i got the redirect for the dccexploit..just checking if i'm good
[11:02] <Hoosteen> anybody?
[11:03] <PriceChild> Hoosteen, hey there
[11:03] <Hoosteen> PriceChild, hey there...just checking to make sure i'm good to go
[11:03] <PriceChild> Hoosteen, It seems like there's no-one currently around and I'm not a #ubuntu op so I'm afraid you're just going to have to be patient for someone to test you
[11:03] <Hoosteen> d'oh
[11:04] <Hoosteen> oh well...hehe
[11:04] <PriceChild> Sorry Hoosteen :) And I can't see any ops active anywhere so I'm hesitant to ping a random one
[11:04] <PriceChild> Just be patient and someone will notice you soon :)
[11:05] <Madpilot> Hoosteen, I'm around, and am an op in #ubuntu
[11:05] <PriceChild> woo :)
[11:06] <Madpilot> Hoosteen, please join #madpilot for a DCC test
[11:15] <Madpilot> Hoosteen, ping - you need to join #madpilot if you want me to clear your #ubuntu ban - I have to test that you've actually fixed your settings...
[11:16] <ompaul> mc44, stop haunting IRC :)
[11:16] <mc44> boooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
[11:22] <Seveas> @lart mc44
[11:22] <mc44> Seveas: just cos you didnt include the link :p
[11:23] <Hoosteen> PriceChild, thanks for your help...hehe
[11:24] <PriceChild> No probs Hoosteen, see you in #ubuntu :)
[11:24] <Hoosteen> yeppers!
[11:27] <SportChick> @hug Seveas