=== doko [n=doko@dslb-088-073-102-194.pools.arcor-ip.net]  has joined #ubuntu-toolchain
=== fabbione [i=fabbione@gordian.fabbione.net]  has joined #ubuntu-toolchain
=== Dvalin [i=hawkeye@terror.sintrax.net]  has joined #ubuntu-toolchain
=== infinity [n=adconrad@cerberus.0c3.net]  has joined #ubuntu-toolchain
=== Keybuk [n=scott@wing-commander.netsplit.com]  has joined #ubuntu-toolchain
=== tmarble [n=tmarble@user-38q4et6.cable.mindspring.com]  has joined #ubuntu-toolchain
=== jb-home [n=jbailey@modemcable173.9-56-74.mc.videotron.ca]  has joined #ubuntu-toolchain
[04:30] <jb-home> doko: ping
[04:30] <doko> jb-home: pong
[04:30] <jb-home> doko: They might be, I read the changelogs of them and pull out changes occasionally.  Mostly they've been updating to new freebsd support and such.
[04:31] <jb-home> It's worth subscribing to the changelog.
[04:31] <jb-home> But our glibc is always going to ride ahead of Debian's.
[04:31] <jb-home> We also differ in a number of significant ways - they're still dragging along LT patches, for instance.
[04:31] <doko> well, if you do have packages which can be installed on top of dapper ...
[04:32] <jb-home> Dapper?
[04:32] <doko> or was it breezy?
[04:32] <doko> the last hp ...
[04:32] <jb-home> Dapper still had LT support.
[04:32] <jb-home> on i386, that is.
[04:32] <jb-home> Edgy dropped it there, too.
[04:33] <doko> so where are your glibc hppa packages?
[04:33] <jb-home> Oh!  I see. =)
[04:34] <jb-home> I have them on a500-hppa.montreal.canonical.com.  The binutils CVS that we've updated to is more picky about CFI constraints.
[04:34] <jb-home> I updated to that after I got ubuntu10 building.
[04:37] <jb-home> diff -uNr glibc-2.5.orig/ports/sysdeps/hppa/dl-trampoline.S glibc-2.5/ports/sysdeps/hppa/dl-trampoline.S
[04:37] <jb-home> --- glibc-2.5.orig/ports/sysdeps/hppa/dl-trampoline.S	2006-09-07 16:34:43.000000000 +0000
[04:37] <jb-home> +++ glibc-2.5/ports/sysdeps/hppa/dl-trampoline.S	2007-01-30 15:15:58.000000000 +0000
[04:37] <jb-home> @@ -284,5 +284,6 @@
[04:37] <jb-home>  	bv,n	0(%r2)
[04:37] <jb-home>          .EXIT
[04:37] <jb-home>          .PROCEND
[04:37] <jb-home> +	cfi_endproc
[04:37] <jb-home>  	.size   _dl_runtime_profile, . - _dl_runtime_profile
[04:37] <jb-home> Is what's needed with the new binutils.
[04:38] <jb-home> So I'll start that build in a moment.
[04:39] <doko> I'll have a new binutils tomorrow
[04:39] <fabbione> so we need new binutils and new gcc and we are good to go?
[04:39] <fabbione> and new binutils will be able to build a working kernel?
[04:40] <doko> for feisty+1 ...
[04:40] <jb-home> fabbione: The binutils and gcc are already in the snapshot archive.  But they uncovered another bug in glibc.
[04:40] <doko> snapshot archive? did I miss something?
[04:40] <fabbione> so there is no hope to get hppa running for feisty?
[04:40] <jb-home> doko: http://people.ubuntu.com/~jbailey/snapshot/hppa-feisty/
[04:40] <fabbione> doko: it's his personal archive
[04:40] <doko> ahh
[04:40] <fabbione> brb.. my son is crying
[04:41] <jb-home> fabbione: I haven't tested a kernel build with the binutils yet.  The kernel FTBFSs at the moment.
[04:41] <jb-home> I think the hppa patches haven't been updated.
[04:42] <jb-home> That'll block going ahead still, since we need the linux-libc-dev from it.
[04:42] <jb-home> doko: I'm still hoping for at least main for feisty.
[04:43] <jb-home> doko: For binutils, We had been using the bzr repo before, I think.
[04:43] <jb-home> Would you mind going back to using it so we can share a bit easier?
[04:44] <doko> yes, I can check in things there ... did debian packages yesterday
[04:45] <jb-home> Cool.
[04:45] <jb-home> What prompted the update?
[04:47] <fabbione> jb-home: feh
[04:48] <jb-home> fabbione: Eh, you know the life of a non-archive port as well as I do.
[04:48] <fabbione> oh fuck... my son can't fall asleep
[04:48] <fabbione> BRB
[04:48] <jb-home> It's like chasing a train that's running just a bit faster than you are.
[04:52] <doko> jb-home: the powerpc binutils could not built with themself, that works in the update
[04:52] <jb-home> Ah, cool.
[04:53] <jb-home> Well, binutils -ubuntu11 building on my hppa box.
[04:53] <jb-home> LaMont offered to help with the hppa porting stuff, so I'm going to ask him to please twiddle the kernel into a buildable state.
[05:01] <fabbione> jb-home: ok... well do you recall where the kernel FTBFS?
[05:02] <fabbione> perhpas we can get kyle or Ben to fix it
[05:02] <fabbione> i am sure Ben can do it
[05:02] <jb-home> Nope, but it was about 30 seconds into the build, less than a page of "CC "...
[05:02] <fabbione> ok
[05:02] <fabbione> i might take a look at it sometimes next week
[05:02] <fabbione> but i don't promise
[05:02] <jb-home> Sure, I wanted to hand off to lamont because 1) He offered. 2) It means thatI can totally drop it from my thoughts.
[05:03] <fabbione> sounds like a plan :)
[05:03] <fabbione> but without running/building kernel we will still hit other issues
[05:03] <jb-home> I need building kernel ASAP.
[05:03] <jb-home> Running kernel can wait a week or two if it needs to.
[05:04] <fabbione> i suggest we talk to Ben.. specially because we will need a kernel source in the archive for the bootstrap to happen
[05:04] <fabbione> he has hppa in his barn
[05:04] <jb-home> I'm sure Ben will be involved.
[05:04] <jb-home> But you missed the point.
[05:04] <jb-home> I don't want to care about the kernel at all.
[05:04] <jb-home> I'm handing that off to someone else as quickly as I can. =)
[05:05] <fabbione> yeah yeah i got it
[05:05] <fabbione> we as in lamont/me
[05:05] <fabbione> there... so you are happy ;)
[05:05] <jb-home> \o/
[05:59] <jb-home> Whee, the new glibc build appears to have gotten past the stage where it died last time.
[05:59] <jb-home> So hopefully one more upload and we're all good. =)
=== jbailey_ [n=jbailey@modemcable173.9-56-74.mc.videotron.ca]  has joined #ubuntu-toolchain
=== doko_ [n=doko@dslb-088-073-085-168.pools.arcor-ip.net]  has joined #ubuntu-toolchain
=== lamont [i=lamont@nat/hp/x-8fb7c5c076c51d29]  has joined #ubuntu-toolchain