[02:11] <Admiral_Chicago> asac: you should add yourself to the ML
[02:12] <Admiral_Chicago> :)
[06:52] <Admiral_Chicago> seems like karma got fixed today. it doubled for me
[11:38] <asac> Admiral_Chicago: yep ... though who knows if this is a fix or another bug :)
[01:36] <asac> anyone running feisty avail?
[01:54] <asac> gnomefreak: hi ... how is your baby doin?
[01:58] <asac> gnomefreak: I have extended the bugs/states page a bit ... if you have comments let me know
[01:58] <asac> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/States
[01:58] <gnomefreak> shes doing good :) they are both sleeping atm
[01:58] <gnomefreak> ok ill look
[02:00] <asac> gnomefreak: are they at home already?
[02:01] <gnomefreak> yeah i was able to bring them home this morning
[02:02] <gnomefreak> what happened to the show bugs link on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/Tags
[02:03] <asac> they will be extended ... but in general tags used there as quickreferenced should be explained in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/States too
[02:03] <asac> as each state has his own set of valid tags
[02:04] <asac> anyway ... someone has to update the urls for them :)
[02:04] <asac> dunno why they are not there anymore
[02:05] <Admiral_Chicago> 06:36 < asac> anyone running feisty avail?
[02:05] <Admiral_Chicago> I am
[02:05] <gnomefreak> Admiral_Chicago: did you make it?
[02:05] <Admiral_Chicago> gnomefreak: yes
[02:05] <asac> yeah ... great
[02:05] <gnomefreak> congrats
[02:05] <Admiral_Chicago> gnomefreak: thanks
[02:05] <gnomefreak> yw
[02:05] <asac> Admiral_Chicago: I will upload a new firefox package ... can you at least try if it still integrates well in gnome desktop?
[02:06] <Admiral_Chicago> sabdfl was highly impressed by my work with our team. well our team in general
[02:06] <asac> Admiral_Chicago: i am not sure because I switched to use official branding build infrastructure und had to revert several patches
[02:06] <Admiral_Chicago> well i don't run GNOME but i'll install it when i'm in class
[02:07] <asac> you run kde?
[02:07] <Admiral_Chicago> yes
[02:07] <asac> or what?
[02:07] <asac> hmmm
[02:07] <gnomefreak> kde should have kde-intergation afaik the spec was oked
[02:07] <gnomefreak> asac: are you uploading it to ubuntu servers?
[02:08] <asac> today sometime ... but want to test desktop integration before
[02:08] <gnomefreak> s/servers/repos
[02:08] <gnomefreak> asac: ok give me about an hour?
[02:08] <asac> hour for what?
[02:08] <gnomefreak> i have feisty i just need to do a few things than i can revert the symlinks and test it
[02:09] <asac> ok ... I still need an hour too :)
[02:09] <gnomefreak> ah good
[02:09] <asac> have to once again walk through the latest interdiff :)
[02:09] <Admiral_Chicago> asac: unfortunetly I just woke up and have class from 8am - 5pm. it is 7.09 here
[02:11] <asac> Admiral_Chicago: that sound like a filled schedule
[02:12] <Admiral_Chicago> yes, so I can test at 24 UTC at the earliest
[02:27] <gnomefreak> um wtf is Could not open the address "https://launchpad.net/bugs/85094":
[02:27] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 85094 in firefox "[apport]  firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall()" [Undecided,Unconfirmed] 
[02:27] <gnomefreak> There was an error launching the default action command associated with this location.
[02:27] <gnomefreak> can anyone open that link?
[02:28] <gnomefreak> i can open it by copying nad pasting the link into ff but not ctrl+left click :(
[02:30] <gnomefreak> i cant launch any link from irssi anymore :(
[02:30] <asac> gnomefreak: opening link from terminal works
[02:30] <asac> i use irssi too in console
[02:30] <asac> but use gnome terminal feature to open links
[02:31] <gnomefreak> i cant open it :( i removed ff3 and now no links will open from terminal. (using gnome-terminal
[02:31] <asac> ah
[02:31] <asac> go to preferences->preferred applications
[02:31] <asac> there firefox has probably changed your default browser
[02:32] <asac> fix it by resetting to default app firefox
[02:32] <gnomefreak> ah thats right
[02:32] <asac> :)
[02:32] <asac> yeah ... the great "register as default browser feature" :)
[02:33] <asac> which is broken if you install firefox in /usr hierachy properly
[02:33] <asac> it just works for dist/bin installs :)
[02:33] <asac> at least for thunderbird
[02:33] <Admiral_Chicago> i'm off everyone. long day ahead af me.
[02:33] <gnomefreak> its no longer there :(
[02:34] <asac> Admiral_Chicago: cu
[02:35] <gnomefreak> should be firefox %u right?
[02:35] <gnomefreak> have fun Admiral_Chicago
[02:35] <Admiral_Chicago> yes and i will gnomefreak
[02:35] <asac> dunno ... if you select firefox from drop down than it should be right
[02:35] <gnomefreak> asac: no drop down :(
[02:36] <asac> gnome preferred application dialog?
[02:36] <gnomefreak> the drop down only says custom. i think this is a bug in gnome-control-center
[02:36] <asac> or where are you?
[02:36] <gnomefreak> asac: in perferred apps
[02:36] <asac> ah
[02:36] <asac> ok
[02:36] <asac> than you have no firefox package installed _:) ?
[02:37] <asac> the preferred application dialog looks if there is an executable /usr/bin/firefox to enable the firefox entry
[02:37] <gnomefreak> sure i do :)
[02:37] <asac> then you messed something else up
[02:37] <asac> but should be
[02:37] <asac> firefox %s
[02:38] <gnomefreak> it works now
[02:38] <gnomefreak> i think it the control ceter that is bugged
[02:43] <asac> have you tried beryl?
[02:44] <gnomefreak> yes ofcourse :)
[02:44] <asac> ok ... going to lunch .. thing the firefox package should ready for preview upload when I return :)
[02:44] <asac> really?
[02:44] <asac> great
[02:44] <asac> will definitly come back to you :)
[02:45] <gnomefreak> ok and yep :)
[03:42] <asac> gnomefreak: you can try
[03:42] <asac> http://people.ubuntu.com/~asac/feisty/firefox
[03:42] <asac> either pull by hand or add to sources.list
[03:42] <asac> thx
[03:56] <gnomefreak> ok will do
[03:59] <gnomefreak> aded repo to sources : its easier that way :)
[04:00] <gnomefreak> and what do you mean by better intergration in gnome? its in the menus its got a launcher already ;)
[04:06] <gnomefreak> asac: what package am i wanting? upgrade isnt grabbing it
[04:06] <gnomefreak> hold that thought smart didnt see your repo
[04:09] <gnomefreak> wont let me add your repo it keeps saying malformed line and i had added deb to the front
[04:10] <asac> wait
[04:10] <asac> http://www.asoftsite.org/s9y/archives/81-APT-repository-Backports-for-sarge-available-+-testing-dropped!.html
[04:11] <gnomefreak> wth is that
[04:11] <asac> the line should look like that (of course replace the proper url)
[04:12] <gnomefreak> deb http://people.ubuntu.com/~asac/feisty/firefox is what i added since that is where the packages are
[04:12] <asac> yeah ... append ./
[04:12] <gnomefreak> ah
[04:13] <asac> like in the examples above
[04:13] <gnomefreak> ok trying again ty
[04:23] <gnomefreak> they seem to be all amd64.debs that are upgrading my 32bit (this mistake in naming?)
[04:24] <asac> yeah ... sorry
[04:24] <asac> can you respin on i386?
[04:24] <gnomefreak> its all good :) might want to change it for upload
[04:24] <asac> upload will be source only
[04:24] <asac> thats ubuntu policy
[04:25] <gnomefreak> ah ok
[04:25] <gnomefreak> respin as in rebuild?
[04:25] <asac> yep
[04:26] <gnomefreak> should be easy enough not really any file changes just grab source diff and dsc and just runt he commands?
[04:26] <gnomefreak> run the*
[04:27] <gnomefreak> will try it in a few
[04:33] <gnomefreak> Host 'FeistyFawn', running Linux 2.6.20-8-generic - Cpu0: Intel 1681 MHz; Up: 17:05; Users: 4; Load: 0.06; Free: [Mem: 26/250 Mio]  [Swap: 1398/1459 Mio] ; Vpenis: 20.9 cm;
[04:34] <asac> just make
[04:34] <asac> apt-get source firefox
[04:34] <asac> then go to the firefox-2.0.0.1+1 dir
[04:34] <asac> and run dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot
[04:34] <asac> and resolve missing build dependencies
[04:34] <asac> until it builds
[04:35] <gnomefreak> ah easy enough
[04:35] <asac> of course you need to add deb-src line
[04:35] <asac> for apt-get source
[04:35] <gnomefreak> yep
[04:35] <asac> there is some apt(itude) command to install build depends
[04:35] <asac> but I forgot
[04:35] <asac> and do it manually (like described above)
[04:35] <gnomefreak> sudo apt-get build-dep <package>
[04:35] <asac> ah ... will not build on edgy
[04:35] <asac> yeah
[04:35] <asac> :)
[04:35] <asac> great
[04:35] <gnomefreak> on feisty :)
[04:35] <asac> good
[04:43] <gnomefreak> you want firefox-gnome-support firefox and firefox-dbg respun? or all of the packages?
[04:43] <asac> just all
[04:43] <asac> just
[04:43] <asac> dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot
[04:43] <gnomefreak> for all the packages though right?
[04:44] <asac> no ... just once in the extracted source directory
[04:44] <gnomefreak> ah ok for firefox
[04:55] <asac> does it build?
[04:55] <asac> gnomefreak: ^^
[04:58] <gnomefreak> dont know still getting the 64bit named packages from update when thats done ill build it
[04:59] <gnomefreak> asac: if i get building ff comfortable i can build the 32bit. respinning should be no issue at all
[04:59] <gnomefreak> lol i cant update ill begin rebuilding them now
[05:00] <asac> you probably shouldn't be able to upgrade
[05:00] <asac> either you install is 32 or 64 bit
[05:00] <gnomefreak> 64bit name stopped me from upgrading them
[05:01] <asac> gnomefreak: i would be fine if you can contribute i386 builds for preview packages ... you have a place where you can put them up temporarily, so I can sync them to my people.ubuntu.com directory from there?
[05:02] <gnomefreak> i should have a place but it will be downloadable not repo type
[05:03] <asac> thats no problem ... i will sync them to my place so we have one place for all ... there I can generate repo files
[05:03] <gnomefreak> k
[05:13] <asac> does it work well?
[05:13] <gnomefreak> havent ran it yet
[05:13] <gnomefreak> grabbing build-deps and source for firefox atm
[05:14] <asac> ah ok :) now I remember that your connection is on the low end :)
[05:14] <gnomefreak> yep :(
[05:15] <gnomefreak> about 23 minutes left for the source
[05:15] <asac> just to be sure everything is right:
[05:15] <asac> does it pull the source from my repo?
[05:16] <gnomefreak> yep
[05:16] <asac> fine
[05:16] <asac> then its just a matter of time. Maybe I will manage to setup a system soon where you all can log in and build ... with some more decent bandwidth :)
[05:17] <gnomefreak> :)
[05:17] <asac> no
[05:17] <asac> as i said
[05:17] <asac> there is just one source tree
[05:17] <asac> if you build from there
[05:17] <asac> everything will be build
[05:17] <gnomefreak> ohhh
[05:17] <gnomefreak> sweet
[05:17] <asac> you end up with a firefox-xxxx/ directory
[05:17] <asac> running dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot
[05:17] <asac> produces all packages defined in debian/control
[05:17] <gnomefreak> ah
[05:18] <gnomefreak> thats easy enough :)
[05:18] <asac> you will even end up with transitional packages that i didn't upload
[05:18] <gnomefreak> oh damn
[05:18] <asac> e.g. mozilla-firefox mozilla-firefox-dom-inspector et al
[05:18] <asac> those are no problem
[05:18] <asac> as they are pretty small
[05:19] <asac> a problem?
[05:19] <gnomefreak> ah ok
[05:19] <gnomefreak> not a bit
[05:19] <gnomefreak> asac: when im done let me know what you want uploaded and ill upload them to a firefox dir on the server so you can grab them
[05:19] <asac> yep
[05:20] <asac> we need all (non transitional) debs produced ... but not the orig.tar.gz nor the .dsc file
[05:20] <asac> nor the diff.gz and .changes
[05:21] <gnomefreak> k
[05:22] <asac> the easiest way to ensure that you don't miss a package is to setup dput or dupload
[05:22] <asac> but maybe later :)
[05:23] <gnomefreak> :)
[05:44] <gnomefreak> its building but i didnt use -k<KEYID> so i might have to redo it
[05:47] <asac> yeah if you want to sign the result then yes
[05:48] <asac> would be ok to just sign the .changes manually afterwards so I can at least do some basic verification
[05:48] <asac> whats your id?
[05:48] <asac> ah ... lp
[05:49] <gnomefreak>  3C1C3C2A
[05:49] <gnomefreak> key id
[05:50] <asac> yep already have it
[06:05] <dfarning> good morning all
[06:05] <gnomefreak> morning
[06:06] <gnomefreak> this is taking longer than i thought. but its all good :)
[06:06] <dfarning> what are you working on;)
[06:06] <gnomefreak> 32bit firefox packages :)
[06:06] <gnomefreak> just repackaging them for 32bit
[06:07] <dfarning> nice are you packaging them from scratch from mozilla tarball?
[06:07] <gnomefreak> from 64bit builds from asac
[06:07] <dfarning> is there a bzr branch were you are doing this work?
[06:08] <gnomefreak> no not yet
[06:08] <gnomefreak> i was trying to test the builds but they wouldnt install due to being 64bit
[06:08] <asac> dfarning: me?
[06:09] <gnomefreak> you ;)
[06:09] <dfarning> would it be much work to set up a bzr branch?
[06:09] <asac> yep from scratch :)
[06:09] <asac> i have a git archive now ... but more to organize patches than to keep a histroy atm
[06:09] <asac> actually I like some features and still had not time how to properly do it in bzr
[06:09] <dfarning> while i was asking gnomefreak but if you have something that would be great
[06:10] <asac> dfarning: you know bzr a bit?
[06:10] <dfarning> crikey i'm still trying to get IRC to work;)
[06:11] <dfarning> I have played with it bit
[06:12] <dfarning> I could set up something up and put up a short wiki page on how to use it.
[06:12] <asac> or just link a good tutorial :) there are plenty I gues
[06:12] <dfarning> It may be crude but it will work
[06:13] <dfarning> ok Will work on this later today
[06:13] <dfarning> asac, did you get the mail from Martin about bug-report?
[06:14] <dfarning> it is really useful
[06:14] <asac> dfarning: let me play a bit with bzr first
[06:14] <asac> yes I got ... what does it do?
[06:15] <dfarning> basically, we can write some hooks for individual programs so that wecan have specific information automatically reported to us.
[06:16] <asac> sounds interesting
[06:16] <asac> can one extend command-line arguments of bug-report too?
[06:16] <dfarning> the hooks can take care of frequently asked question such as flash version
[06:17] <dfarning> I don't thinks so yet
[06:17] <asac> so we can run arbitrary scripts?
[06:17] <dfarning> but we can write a number of scripts and have them include in the apport package
[06:17] <dfarning> it will take some planning ahead
[06:18] <asac> will those hooks work on poth ... crash report as well as menu link?
[06:18] <asac> s/poth/both/
[06:18] <dfarning> yes
[06:18] <asac> ... we cannot install extension scripts from our packages?
[06:19] <asac> e.g. ship the scripts on our own?
[06:19] <dfarning> We will have to look
[06:19] <dfarning> currently the hooks are stored in //usr/bin/apport/package-hooks
[06:20] <dfarning> that is a good idea
[06:21] <dfarning> each package _should_ install its own hook rather than have apport worry about it
[06:21] <asac> yes, i think if this is not yet done, it will be soon.
[06:21] <dfarning> gnomefreak, I'll post some sample hooks and their results this afternoon on the wiki
[06:21] <asac> does bug-report include any information on its own (e.g. like package version, distribution, etc.)?
[06:22] <gnomefreak> dfarning: ty
[06:22] <dfarning> at this point no but that would be easy to implemt as it is already part of crash report
[06:24] <dfarning> I'll file some feature requests and send you the links
[06:24] <asac> gnomefreak: build still running?
[06:24] <gnomefreak> yep
[06:25] <asac> if you have enough memory it might not be that bad.
[06:26] <gnomefreak> 256 :(
[06:26] <dfarning> I have posted a clue file  that reflects the current /states page at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/Bughelper/ClueFile
[06:27] <gnomefreak> some sort of differnet ram than normal so its too much money to spend on this pc
[06:27] <asac> dfarning: so do we want to prefix?
[06:27] <asac> that would the match even more unique
[06:27] <asac> like
[06:28] <asac> mt:needtester
[06:28] <asac> ?
[06:28] <dfarning> Yes, I think that would be good to reduce confussion
[06:29] <asac> now to create namespace? ... colon, dash, slash ??
[06:30] <dfarning> yikes I hate naming
[06:31] <dfarning> are their any tools where a colon in the sting will cause them to barf?
[06:31] <dfarning> s/sting/string
[06:35] <dfarning> offtopic: AlexLatchford  has done already done two months of good work with us.  Should we encourage him to apply for ubuntu membership next month?
[06:36] <dfarning> good bug work and really good wiki work
[06:36] <asac> i think so ... but lets him decide if he feels ready :)
[06:37] <gnomefreak> yes i think we should
[06:39] <dfarning> ok sounds good i'll email him know that we are behind him if he is ready to apply;
[06:40] <gnomefreak> :)
[06:40] <dfarning> I'll be off line for the next several hours. hope to have some hooks ready to go
[06:41] <dfarning> bye
[06:41] <asac> great ... i will be away for 2 hours or so from now
[06:54] <asac> gnomefreak: ty
[06:54] <gnomefreak> yw
[08:13] <gnomefreak> built and being uploaded atm
[08:20] <dfarning_> New wiki summarizing how we are you bughelper at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/Bughelper
[08:20] <dfarning_> s/you/using/
[08:20] <gnomefreak> ty
[08:21] <dfarning_> gnomefreak, next is the apport stuff espically for you;)
[08:21] <gnomefreak> :) ty
[08:33] <gnomefreak> asac: all you need uploaded is firefox ff-dom-inspector -dbg -dev -gnome-support libnspr libnspr-dev libnss libnss-dev (all .debs of those packages) you dont need changes, source, dsc or diff
[08:34] <gnomefreak> and you dont need the mozilla-* packages?
[09:01] <gnomefreak> uploaded all just in case should be done in an hour or so. not uploading source since its already uploaded unless you need it just let me know
[09:31] <AlexLatchford> Meh?
[09:32] <gnomefreak> AlexLatchford: how about going up for membership next CC meeting?
[09:33] <AlexLatchford> maybe in a few months
[09:33] <AlexLatchford> think I need to build up a bit more Karma before I try
[09:33] <gnomefreak> no your ok on that
[09:34] <AlexLatchford> nah I have only been involved for a few months also
[09:34] <AlexLatchford> feel like I should contribute a bit more
[09:34] <gnomefreak> if you document what youve done and what your plans to learn to do or do on your wiki you will be fine :)
[09:34] <gnomefreak> asac: ok built almost done uploaded and im gonna test it now
[09:35] <gnomefreak> bad news:  it kills your icon :(
[09:36] <gnomefreak> its not letting me set one either
[09:42] <gnomefreak> ok cant use the firefox icon mozilla-firefox.xpm but seem to beablet o use .png icons in pixmaps
[09:48] <gnomefreak> looks like icon was left out of build
[09:57] <gnomefreak> asac: ok here is the link it should be fully complete in about 28-30 minutes from now. http://gnomefreak.youmortals.com/FireFox/ but looks like we are gonna have to rebuild after icon is included (or fixed) other than that testing is going well.
[10:51] <asac> gnomefreak: but only in the menu, right? can you please try to cp /usr/share/firefox/icons/mozicon128.png /usr/share/pixmaps/firefox.png  as well as to /usr/share/pixmaps/mozilla-firefox.png helps?
[10:57] <gnomefreak> asac: menu and launcher
[10:57] <asac> tried?
[10:58] <gnomefreak> where am i getting them from?
[10:58] <asac> /usr/share/firefox/icons/mozicon128.png
[10:58] <asac> that should exist
[10:58] <asac> the other two should exist too
[10:58] <gnomefreak> ah ok
[10:58] <asac> so just copy it over for now ... I create links in package
[10:59] <asac> actually /usr/share/pixmaps/mozilla-firefox.png should already be a link to nowhere
[10:59] <asac> so maybe remove it
[11:00] <gnomefreak> that works
[11:00] <gnomefreak> still cant expect users to have to do that?
[11:02] <asac> they don't need to
[11:02] <asac> i update package to link it
[11:02] <asac> please try:
[11:02] <asac> rm those new files
[11:02] <asac> again
[11:02] <asac> and link:
[11:03] <asac> ln -s /usr/share/firefox/icons/mozicon128.png /usr/share/pixmaps/firefox.png
[11:03] <asac> ln -s /usr/share/firefox/icons/mozicon128.png /usr/share/pixmaps/mozilla-firefox.png
[11:04] <gnomefreak> works also
[11:06] <asac> fine
[11:06] <asac> then it will be fixed i guess
[11:07] <gnomefreak> can it be fixed without having to rebuild it?
[11:07] <asac> gnomefreak: do you find a place where something is not called "Mozilla Firefox" .. .e.g. like BonEcho
[11:07] <asac> ?
[11:08] <gnomefreak> nope its called mozilla-firefox everywhere that i can tell
[11:08] <gnomefreak> without the -
[11:09] <asac> great
[11:09] <asac> aehm
[11:09] <asac> one more thing
[11:09] <asac> wait a sec
[11:09] <asac> if you reset your homepage to default
[11:09] <asac> is the homepage in place?
[11:09] <asac> or not found?
[11:10] <gnomefreak> it works it brings up file:///usr/share/ubuntu-artwork/home/index.html
[11:10] <asac> in my chroot it appears to not exit
[11:10] <asac> does it exist for you?
[11:10] <gnomefreak> but its Edgys page :(
[11:10] <asac> maybe not yet been updated?
[11:10] <gnomefreak> guess not
[11:10] <asac> but it exists in feisty for you?
[11:10] <asac> then its fine
[11:10] <gnomefreak> yes
[11:12] <gnomefreak> i dont remember seeing that befor
[11:12] <gnomefreak> e
[11:12] <asac> what happens if you use it?
[11:12] <asac> at least we should remove the translate entry
[11:12] <asac> its of no use atm
[11:12] <gnomefreak> brings me to LP
[11:13] <asac> yeah
[11:13] <asac> unknown page
[11:13] <asac> quite a mess
[11:13] <gnomefreak> yeah the translate doesnt seem to work
[11:13] <asac> maybe we should drop it for now
[11:13] <AlexLatchford> Admiral_Chicago: can you take a look at the membership page and tweak it to suit the new membership requirements?
[11:13] <AlexLatchford> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Membership
[11:13] <asac> mozilla already asked us to better work together with them if we want to translate
[11:13] <gnomefreak> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/feisty/+sources/firefox/+gethelp that is where the get help online brings me
[11:14] <asac> and not to do it on our own
[11:14] <asac> makes sense imo
[11:14] <gnomefreak> i agree if they are willing to help us
[11:14] <asac> there are already a good bunch of translations available
[11:14] <asac> they all come from them
[11:14] <gnomefreak> cool
[11:14] <asac> if we want a new, we can help them?
[11:15] <asac> look at source firefox-locales
[11:15] <asac> or thunderbird-locales
[11:15] <asac> the translations are already maintained under their patronage
[11:16] <gnomefreak> i agree to work with them for translations/locales (does that mean i need to send locale issues upstream?)
[11:16] <asac> depends of what kind
[11:17] <asac> po files we maintain ... but there shouldn't be any necessary for us in the long run
[11:17] <asac> maybe thunderbird sill has a debconf template ... firefox not
[11:17] <asac> mostly people ask us to add new .xpi ... because they exist upstream
[11:17] <asac> quite similar to the request about the lt.xpi
[11:18] <asac> you remember?
[11:18] <gnomefreak> yes
[11:20] <gnomefreak> it doesnt seem we have any lang packs installed
[11:20] <gnomefreak> i cant change the language the page displays in
[11:20] <gnomefreak> oh i have a crash report too :)
[11:21] <gnomefreak> i mean :(
[11:23] <gnomefreak> and i dont see anything at all usful in it. it looks like its missing parts
[11:23] <asac> gnomefreak: changing the language is not what is achieved, rather translation for the UI
[11:23] <asac> hmm
[11:24] <asac> when did it happen?
[11:24] <asac> opening some dialog?
[11:24] <gnomefreak> when i closed ff after changing default lang.
[11:24] <gnomefreak> sorry after oipening it after closing it
[11:24] <gnomefreak> opening*
[11:25] <gnomefreak> no stacktrace nor threadstacktrace
[11:25] <gnomefreak> i just unpacked it
[11:25] <asac> hmm not so good ... anyway, there will be others with more success I guess
[11:25] <asac> :)
[11:25] <gnomefreak> and i dont mean no symbols i mean its missing them totally
[11:26] <gnomefreak> but i will keep playing with it while i can. can we build this version of edgy by chance?
[11:26] <gnomefreak> or is a backport needed for that
[11:29] <asac> what do you want for edgy?
[11:29] <gnomefreak> this version of firefox
[11:29] <gnomefreak> less issues with feistys version than edgys afaics
[11:29] <asac> its not yet that new ... its just build with official branding
[11:30] <asac> aren't they the same build?
[11:30] <gnomefreak> thats what i thought (versioning is different) but i dont see why so many crashes in edgy not so many in feisty
[11:30] <asac> more edgy users of course :)
[11:30] <asac> most have edgy i guess
[11:31] <gnomefreak> could be
[11:31] <asac> i think it is ... we will see that in feisty too as soon as its out
[11:31] <asac> the idea is to push upstream to wink needed changes in before we release or in one of the security/stability updates
[11:31] <gnomefreak> they havent released 2.0.0.2 yet?
[11:31] <asac> not yet
[11:31] <asac> 23
[11:32] <asac> is projected date
[11:32] <asac> might be latest
[11:32] <asac> later
[11:32] <gnomefreak> 23rd as in next week?
[11:32] <asac> yes
[11:32] <asac> i will try to land the package on the day they release :)
[11:32] <gnomefreak> thtas concidered an update right?
[11:32] <asac> because of freeze?
[11:32] <gnomefreak> yes
[11:33] <asac> we can do what we want :)
[11:33] <gnomefreak> oh sweet
[11:33] <asac> otherwise I would have to stop working :)
[11:33] <asac> no
[11:33] <gnomefreak> :)
[11:33] <asac> we even push full new versions as security updates
[11:33] <asac> so a freeze should not be a problem at all
[11:33] <asac> as long as we don't switch from 2.0 -> 3.0
[11:33] <gnomefreak> ah ok cool
[11:34] <asac> actually most importantly 2.0.0.2 is a security update
[11:34] <asac> upstream already enforced quite hard branch policies
[11:34] <asac> enforces
[11:34] <gnomefreak> so that should be no issue with feisty but what about edgy?
[11:35] <gnomefreak> all thought edgy is very broken for some people anyway
[11:35] <gnomefreak> though
[11:36] <asac> edgy will get security update too
[11:36] <asac> so new version as well
[11:36] <gnomefreak> ok cool
[11:36] <asac> dapper and breeze get latest from 1.5 branch
[11:37] <gnomefreak> yeah
[11:37] <gnomefreak> not sure why we didnt run 1.6 in them though
[11:37] <asac> yeah
[11:37] <asac> i think it was because 1.5 was an unplanned branch which was introduced because it would have taken too long to go 2.0 in one step
[11:38] <gnomefreak> ah
[11:38] <asac> but maybe i am completely wrong ... just have the feeling that i remember that from somewhere :) not more.
[11:46] <gnomefreak> asac: so if ther eis a depends bug ff depends on this and should depend on bleh all i would really have to do is change it in control update changelog and just build as i did today?
[11:47] <asac> i would say yes :)
[11:47] <gnomefreak> sweet
[11:48] <asac> did you ever setup a xen VM?
[11:48] <gnomefreak> nope pc doesnt have enough mem for xen iirc
[11:49] <gnomefreak> never ran any VM due to that
[11:52] <gnomefreak> did you ever push that patch in? the one with the download progress bar?
[11:52] <asac> no ... its not finished ... I still need tests for the second half :)
[11:52] <gnomefreak> ah
[11:53] <gnomefreak> if you have it by say friday i can get it and test it on the slow pc this weekend
[11:55] <asac> sure
[11:55] <asac> hope she is doing better soon
[11:55] <gnomefreak> me too but i dont mind waiting on her hand and foot :)
[12:16] <Admiral_Chicago> AlexLatchford: will do