[12:25] <dfarning> shoud be the forth link down on the lp page
[12:26] <dfarning> https://bugs.launchpad.net/~mozilla-bugs/+packagebugs
[12:26] <asac> dfarning: hmmm i don't come to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox hierarchy from there
[12:27] <asac> i mean ... those are just quicksearches for bugs ... but no links to the main page of the package
[12:28] <dfarning> i have not found out how to link directly yet
[12:28] <dfarning> we could list each package manually on the lp
[12:28] <asac> yeah ... but on our home page it should be pretty easy :)
[12:29] <dfarning> i'll take that hint;)
[12:29] <dfarning> on my todo
[12:29] <asac> ty
[12:30] <asac> but maybe it should be something that is automatically shown by lp ?
[12:31] <dfarning> we have already been hammering the lp team with enough requests for this week;)
[12:31] <asac> i still don't get it why we need a subteam mozilla-bugs
[12:31] <asac> whats the difference other than more maintenance overhead :)
[12:32] <asac> can you setup a list on what requests we have submitted and that are pending?
[12:32] <asac> would help a lot not to submit duplicates :)
[12:32] <dfarning> in order to make the -bugs mailing list work
[12:33] <asac> ok ... and on what purpose do we assign bugs to that team?
[12:33] <asac> to allow opt-out from bugmail?
[12:33] <dfarning> we want -bugs subscribbed to bugs so bug spam is directed to the mailing list rather then mt members
[12:33] <asac> hehe bug spam :)
[12:33] <dfarning> right
[12:34] <dfarning> also the bugbot in irc is a member of -bugs
[12:34] <asac> hmmm ... am i subscribed already?
[12:34] <asac> i can't remember :)
[12:35] <asac> otherwise I won't be subscribed to bugs anymore :/
[12:35] <dfarning> I don't think so but...
[12:35] <Admiral_Chicago> asac: you are just on mt, not -bugs
[12:35] <asac> k
[12:35] <dfarning> I am still trying to unsubscribe mt from the bugs
[12:36] <asac> where are links to our mailing lists?
[12:36] <dfarning> that is what AlexLatchford  was asking about this morning
[12:36] <dfarning> checking
[12:37] <dfarning> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam under contacts
[12:38] <asac> dfarning: ... but no word about -bugs :)
[12:38] <dfarning> i will add -bugs
[12:38] <asac> :)
[12:38] <asac> ok subscribed ... will i receive duplicates for now?
[12:39] <dfarning> evolution is filtering out my dups;)
[12:40] <asac> i think my mail setup does that too ... but depends on how mails are send
[12:42] <dfarning> asac, what is our agreement with mozilla on patching fx?
[12:43] <Admiral_Chicago> afk people. let me know if you need anything
[12:43] <Admiral_Chicago> btw, i edited wiki.ubuntu.com/FirefoxNewVersion
[12:43] <Admiral_Chicago> should clear up some issues people were telling me about
[01:00] <asac> dfarning: we currently ship it with original branding
[01:00] <asac> we submit patches for approval
[01:01] <asac> they review with high priority ... at least i hope so :)
[01:02] <asac> Admiral_Chicago: maybe that page should be split in pieces?
[01:02] <Admiral_Chicago> asac: how can I make it better? i mean what pieces specifically
[01:05] <asac> Admiral_Chicago: maybe move specific install approaches to separate page each and just outline existing methods on main page?
[01:05] <Admiral_Chicago> hmm, I saw that, maybe I'll print it out and hack on paper
[01:08] <Admiral_Chicago> i'm going to return to my homework though
[01:08] <Admiral_Chicago> i do work offline sometimes.
[01:10] <asac> good for your eyes :)
[01:10] <Admiral_Chicago> blah, my eyes are terrible. I'm at my desk but reading at a book and not looking at the screen
[01:13] <gnomefreak> asac: http://gnomefreak.youmortals.com/Thunderbird-Edgy/ its done uploading
[01:14] <gnomefreak> uploading feistys atm
[01:14] <Admiral_Chicago> btw, latest fx isn't in feisty yet
[01:14] <asac> not yet built
[01:14] <asac> :)
[01:15] <asac> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/2.0.0.1+1-0ubuntu1
[01:15] <gnomefreak> latest fx? you mean 2.0.0.1?
[01:15] <gnomefreak> oh been there done that
[01:15] <gnomefreak> :)
[01:16] <asac> should be built for i386 too soon i guess
[01:16] <gnomefreak> asac: should i mark the bug as fix released after done uploading feistys patched tb?
[01:16] <gnomefreak> asac: didnt i build that yesterday?
[01:16] <asac> gnomefreak: ... we don't fix it :)
[01:16] <asac> you can mark it as fix committed
[01:17] <gnomefreak> ah ok who fixes it than?
[01:17] <asac> we don't upload to feisty with new patches
[01:17] <gnomefreak> oh
[01:17] <asac> these are packages for our convenience atm
[01:18] <asac> until thinks with mozilla have worked out
[01:18] <gnomefreak> ah ok
[01:18] <asac> aka patch approval process is running
[01:18] <asac> s/think/thing/
[01:18] <gnomefreak> you have to ok all patches with mozilla?
[01:20] <asac> i don't think that this will be an issue in the long run
[01:21] <gnomefreak> ok but edgys can still be uploaded (after checking with mozilla)?
[01:21] <asac> will work out quite well once we have reviewed our current patches
[01:21] <asac> what do you mean?
[01:21] <asac> on security updates, we update edgy, of course
[01:22] <gnomefreak> asac: the replytolist patch for edgy's tb
[01:22] <asac> no ... new features are for new relesaes
[01:22] <gnomefreak> oh ok
[01:23] <asac> but that has nothing to do with mozilla, but rather sane release policy
[01:23] <asac> you just cannot update features if you want to maintain huge software collection in a stable fashion
[01:24] <gnomefreak> oh ok
[01:24] <gnomefreak> asac: i know i figured atleast backport this to edgy (many people are looking for this fix)
[01:24] <gnomefreak> including AlexLatchford
[01:25] <asac> yeah we can release it from an mozillateam repository
[01:26] <gnomefreak> oh your repo is gonna be the latest/greatest patches features we cant release to archive.u.c
[01:27] <asac> gnomefreak: we can do that ...but maybe we have to build firefox with unoffical branding for that repository. mozilla.org does the same for nightlies, so it is fair imo.
[01:28] <gnomefreak> agreed
[01:28] <Admiral_Chicago> can we chose one that doesn't suck (blue globe is terrible)
[01:28] <asac> gnomefreak: actually i don't want to setup a repo to upload arbitrary improvements to. But if there is demand it can be included.
[01:29] <Admiral_Chicago> i'd like a testing repository so we can mark bugs as fix release
[01:29] <gnomefreak> Admiral_Chicago: the one we have is fine :) i have  ablack ff logo but shhhh
[01:29] <Admiral_Chicago> black? i use the original Fk logo
[01:29] <Admiral_Chicago> Fx*
[01:30] <asac> Admiral_Chicago: release to a testing repository is fix committed for us i would say
[01:31] <asac> released is only when uploaded to main
[01:31] <asac> reasonable?
[01:32] <Admiral_Chicago> oh right, i thought commit was main, release was fixed in testing
[01:32] <asac> release and rejected are final states (as far as I understood) ... commit is available for testing/preview
[01:33] <Admiral_Chicago> i'll check on Bugs wiki
[01:33] <asac> k
[01:35] <gnomefreak> if you have another patch handy to build i can run it over night
[01:36] <asac> hey ... you could replace the included tarball in archives directory with original upstream tarball and see what happens :)
[01:36] <Admiral_Chicago> bear with my paste..
[01:36] <Admiral_Chicago> #
[01:36] <Admiral_Chicago> nah, pastebin
[01:37] <asac> Admiral_Chicago: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/2.0.0.1+1-0ubuntu1
[01:37] <asac> i386 is built
[01:37] <asac> :)
[01:37] <gnomefreak> thats a bit over my head i think
[01:37] <Admiral_Chicago> http://pastebin.ca/357976
[01:38] <asac> yep
[01:38] <asac> 'that a fix was uploaded' ... refers to main
[01:38] <asac> :)
[01:38] <gnomefreak> oh hell i can do that
[01:39] <asac> gnomefreak: you want to?
[01:39] <gnomefreak> and rebuild it and hope it doesnt break it ;)
[01:39] <gnomefreak> asac: sure
[01:39] <asac> ok:
[01:39] <asac> in changelog ... choose new upstream version
[01:39] <asac> as this will be a new orig.tar.gz
[01:39] <asac> what is the current version ?
[01:40] <gnomefreak> of what tb?
[01:40] <asac> j
[01:40] <asac> y
[01:41] <asac> 1.5.0.9-0ubuntu1+mt
[01:41] <gnomefreak> you want this with tb or ff
[01:41] <asac> tb
[01:41] <asac> firefox is already migrated :)
[01:42] <gnomefreak> ah ok
[01:42] <gnomefreak> yes thats tb version
[01:42] <asac> you can take
[01:42] <asac> 1.5.0.9+1-0ubuntu0+mt for the version :)
[01:42] <gnomefreak> what do i rename it to?
[01:42] <gnomefreak> ah ok
[01:43] <gnomefreak> no need to play with rules or control right?
[01:43] <asac> not atm
[01:43] <asac> ok
[01:43] <asac> 1. adapt version (done)
[01:43] <asac> 2. replace tarball inside archives/ dir
[01:43] <asac> 3. tar the archives dir up
[01:44] <asac> -> new orig.tar.gz ... look at how the directory layout is in current orig.tar.gz
[01:44] <asac> then you just need to replace the proper filename of the original tar.bz2 you placed inside the archives dir
[01:44] <asac> in debian/rules
[01:45] <asac> that should at least allow you to build
[01:45] <asac> ad 2. ... replace the tar.bz2 file in archives/ with the original upstream tar.bz2 from ftp.mozilla.org
[01:46] <gnomefreak> ok ill give it a shot. and this is for tb 1.5newest not 2.0 right
[01:46] <asac> yes
[01:46] <asac> 1.5.0.9
[01:46] <gnomefreak> k
[01:46] <asac> or was it 10 already?
[01:46] <asac> hmm
[01:46] <asac> latest available
[01:46] <asac> :)
[01:46] <asac> same as in archives/ directory
[01:46] <asac> i would say
[01:46] <gnomefreak> ok
[01:47] <asac> maybe you get something done... might brake branding here and there ... but maybe it will just build and we can look on what is broken then :)
[01:47] <asac> good luck ... have to go to bed soon :)
[01:48] <gnomefreak> k ill give it a shot. the archive dir only has a tar in it
[01:48] <asac> yes ... replace that
[01:48] <asac> adapt filename of that in debian/rules
[01:49] <asac> but remember to retar orig.tar.gz
[01:49] <asac> with the new upstreamversion
[01:49] <asac> 1.5.0.9+1
[01:49] <asac> in its name
[01:49] <asac> so ... mozilla-thunderbird_1.5.0.9.orig.tar.gz i guess
[01:49] <asac> so ... mozilla-thunderbird_1.5.0.9+1.orig.tar.gz i guess
[01:49] <asac> of course
[01:49] <gnomefreak> ok
[01:50] <gnomefreak> here is feistys tb you wanted give it a while to finish uploading http://gnomefreak.youmortals.com/Thunderbird-Feisty/
[01:50] <asac> ok will do tomorrow .. have bookmarked
[01:51] <asac> cu ... thx :)
[08:44] <Admiral_Chicago> newest Fx has been put on the repos
[08:44] <Admiral_Chicago> installing it now
[08:45] <AlexLatchford> which repos?
[08:45] <Admiral_Chicago> feisty
[08:45] <AlexLatchford> oh ok
[08:45] <AlexLatchford> whats Feisty like>
[08:46] <AlexLatchford> stable?
[08:46] <Admiral_Chicago> 2.0.0.2 i think. should have a bug fix to one that I have
[08:46] <Admiral_Chicago> pretty stable, a lot more stable than Edgy testing was
[08:46] <AlexLatchford> hmm okay
[08:46] <Admiral_Chicago> I have four bugs but they are all reported
[08:46] <AlexLatchford> I am thinking about making the update at Herd4 or 5
[08:47] <Admiral_Chicago> 2 related to X, one to desktop icons, one related to screen resolution.
[08:47] <AlexLatchford> really want to try out the new network Manager
[08:47] <AlexLatchford> hmm okay
[08:47] <Admiral_Chicago> oh and one related to Fx, but that was upstream
[08:47] <AlexLatchford> aha ok
[08:47] <Admiral_Chicago> i don't use GNOME so I'm not sure
[08:47] <Admiral_Chicago> there is some really cool stuff in Feisty
[08:48] <Admiral_Chicago> the Herd 4 page should be done by now
[08:49] <Admiral_Chicago> anyways, don't you have class ever?
[08:56] <dfarning> Admiral_Chicago,  speaking of class. don't you sleep?
[08:56] <Admiral_Chicago> dfarning: reading.
[08:56] <Admiral_Chicago> I have a test tomorrow, have to read up on the Qur'an
[08:57] <dfarning> enjoy, I am going back to bed.  Just got up for a snack;)
[08:57] <Admiral_Chicago> dfarning: i wish I could go to bed. I have another 40 pages.
[08:57] <Admiral_Chicago> night
[08:57] <dfarning> ouch good luck
[08:58] <Admiral_Chicago> it's not intense, just tedious. well see ya around
[09:04] <AlexLatchford> lol I go to class Freddy, but its normally when you are asleep
[09:05] <AlexLatchford> I have a few mornings and afternoons off a week though, only have 1 day where I have to go in for all lessons
[09:05] <Admiral_Chicago> ah well my classes are usually 16 UTC - 23 UTC
[09:06] <Admiral_Chicago> man I got lucky Alex, one class on Tuesdays and Thursday at 2 - 3.30 PM
[09:06] <Admiral_Chicago> slept all morning, almost missed lunch
[09:07] <Admiral_Chicago> have you seen this: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FeistyFawn/Herd4
[09:07] <Admiral_Chicago> i really like the migration stuff
[12:19] <asac> hi
[12:19] <asac> you had problems with the new build so far?
[02:01] <dfarning> morning all
[02:06] <gnomefreak> morning ill be around (on phone with irs
[02:08] <dfarning> phone with irs? sounds like a lot of time on hold
[02:09] <gnomefreak> btw asac there is no 1.5.0.10 release. the latest is 1.5.0.9
[02:09] <gnomefreak> it is
[02:10] <asac> yep
[02:10] <asac> will be out soonish
[02:10] <gnomefreak> k
[02:11] <asac> gnomefreak: can you give me your url please?
[02:11] <asac> once more
[02:11] <asac> :(
[02:12] <gnomefreak> http://gnomefreak.youmortals.com/
[02:12] <gnomefreak> pick a file you want from ther
[02:13] <gnomefreak> why cant a talk to a frigging person :(
[02:15] <asac> dunno ... pulling
[02:18] <gnomefreak> i foresee this being an all day afair :(
[02:19] <asac> gnomefreak: oh
[02:19] <asac> edgy-security
[02:19] <asac> hmm
[02:20] <asac> thing it should be edgy :)
[02:20] <asac> but doesn't matter for now
[02:20] <gnomefreak> asac: what?
[02:20] <gnomefreak> what should be in edgy-security?
[02:21] <asac> ah
[02:21] <asac> in changelog
[02:21] <asac> first line
[02:21] <asac> you use edgy-security as target distribution
[02:21] <asac> which should be edgy i guess
[02:22] <asac> as this is not a security upload
[02:22] <gnomefreak> ah oops :( can be changed
[02:22] <asac> can keep it now
[02:22] <asac> i won't upload the .changes file anyway ... so nobody can just reupload to official archive
[02:23] <asac> so it doesn't matter if I don't get things wrong
[02:23] <gnomefreak> ah
[02:28] <Admiral_Chicago> have a good day everyone!
[02:32] <gnomefreak> you too
[02:38] <dfarning> asac, where was the link to fx patches? I lost it
[02:40] <gnomefreak> do we have patches ready for implmenting into either?
[02:47] <gnomefreak> that way at the very least i have .debs for it
[02:58] <gnomefreak> asac: is that even worth a try? this way i can build -snapshot .debs (including patches like the replytolist one) mainly for my own personal use since i love tb 2.0
[03:15] <asac> gnomefreak: I guess patches will not apply
[03:15] <gnomefreak> oh :(
[03:15] <asac> gnomefreak: but try :)
[03:26] <gnomefreak> i will try if you need something more pressing let me know
[04:20] <gnomefreak> asac: it looks like only patch 91_fontsfix_359763 will stick. it failed on everyother patch including the one i wanted in there. :( oh well worth a shot
[04:23] <gnomefreak> looking in the tb archive to see if it was added or not
[05:05] <gnomefreak> it doesnt look like it was included in the tb build. (the replytolist patch) atleast for feistys build
[05:41] <gnomefreak> ok oops forgot to install the .xpi ;)
[05:43] <gnomefreak> i just uploaded the .xpi to my thunderbird feisty and edgy folders
[05:59] <poningru> asac: I had couple of other ideas for mozteam
[05:59] <poningru> like having a peter6 like posts in ubuntu forums for all the moz packages
[06:00] <gnomefreak> peter6?
[06:00] <poningru> its a well known guy in mozzine forums
[06:00] <asac> poningru: peter6?
[06:00] <poningru> hold on
[06:01] <poningru> http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewforum.php?f=23
[06:01] <poningru> take a look at the posts created by peter6
[06:01] <poningru> we can provide a .deb for testers
[06:01] <poningru> or a repo
[06:01] <asac> poningru: ah ... ok you want automated rc builds somewhere
[06:01] <asac> hmm
[06:01] <poningru> yeah
[06:02] <poningru> I just dont have the proc power for such a project
[06:02] <gnomefreak> what packages do you want us to put in a forum? me confused
[06:02] <poningru> gnomefreak: like latest builds of firefox
[06:02] <poningru> firefox gp
[06:02] <poningru> and mf
[06:02] <asac> gnomefreak: he wants that we upload weekly builds to my people.ubuntu.com repo for instance
[06:03] <poningru> right
[06:03] <gnomefreak> are we doing weekly builds?
[06:03] <asac> not yet
[06:03] <gnomefreak> :)
[06:03] <poningru> yeah I didnt know that either
[06:03] <poningru> but doing that for all moz packages
[06:03] <asac> we just have tbird and ff for now
[06:04] <poningru> :(
[06:04] <asac> the main problem i see is that I don't have all archs here
[06:04] <poningru> what are we missing?
[06:04] <gnomefreak> asac: i have 386 for all your needs
[06:04] <poningru> lol
[06:04] <gnomefreak> edgy+fesity
[06:04] <poningru> gnomefreak: I dont think he is missing that ;)
[06:04] <gnomefreak> poningru: he has 64
[06:04] <asac> yeah ... but as soon as you (gnomefreak) contribute, I would need to setup a real upload queue with gpg check and all
[06:04] <poningru> oh...
[06:05] <asac> which of course needs some time to setup :)
[06:05] <poningru> asac: or you know provide you with a account on the ssh capable box
[06:05] <gnomefreak> asac: well i am fairly comfortable with contributing when you are ready :)
[06:05] <asac> poningru: can you be here on monday?
[06:05] <asac> 2000 UTC?
[06:05] <poningru> yes sir
[06:06] <gnomefreak> poningru: 3pm for you :)
[06:06] <asac> we have a meeting then ... maybe you can put this on the agenda
[06:06] <poningru> uh... wait what?
[06:06] <poningru> crap
[06:06] <poningru> no I cant
[06:06] <asac> i will think about  how much work it would be for me to set things up
[06:06] <poningru> oh wait yes I can
[06:06] <asac> :)
[06:06] <poningru> I will be like 5 mins late
[06:06] <poningru> but is cool
[06:06] <poningru> my class gets out then
[06:07] <gnomefreak> add it to agenda and we will wait for you on that agenda point
[06:07] <poningru> awesome
[06:07] <asac> great ... can't promiss that we will get started with weekly builds in the next 2 weeks ... but at some point we should definitly have some
[06:07] <poningru> awesome
[06:08] <poningru> also I wanna decrease the release time of firefox security point releases
[06:08] <gnomefreak> asac: are the patches made per version of package? like the replytolist.dpatch is only for tb versions 1.5*?
[06:08] <asac> mostly yes ... some might still apply cleanly on 2.0 branch ... but some might not
[06:09] <gnomefreak> poningru: seeing as we didnt have a maintainer until a week or 2 ago poningru it should get closer together
[06:09] <gnomefreak> 2-3 maybe
[06:09] <asac> poningru: i have to work with pitti on improving responsiveness with security builds
[06:10] <poningru> asac: let me know what I can do to help
[06:11] <asac> poningru: what is your feature-set?
[06:11] <poningru> what do you mean?
[06:11] <poningru> my featureset?
[06:11] <asac> yeah :) ... what can you do and what not :) ... what do you want to learn, what not :)
[06:11] <poningru> oh hehe
[06:12] <gnomefreak> i guess i can build the snapshots without the patches :(
[06:13] <poningru> um... not much really, I am not really that good of a coder
[06:13] <poningru> but I can do patching, testing etc.
[06:14] <gnomefreak> poningru: patching? as in repackage with the patch added?
[06:14] <poningru> I dont know the moz codebase as much as I would like to
[06:14] <poningru> gnomefreak: :p
[06:14] <poningru> yeah I know... trivial
[06:14] <gnomefreak> not really
[06:14] <asac> poningru: .... so you can do basic packaging work?
[06:14] <asac> poningru:
[06:14] <poningru> yeah learning that right now
[06:14] <poningru> would love to
[06:14] <gnomefreak> hint that all goes towards the decreased point releases
[06:15] <asac> poningru: thats fine ... i think there are plenty of things to do :) ... but most importantly we need more people that lurk on bug mail and care for those that lack information :)
[06:18] <asac> its best to start working on need info issues ... in that way one gets a good overview on what bugs exist and what symptoms they have
[06:18] <asac> later one can help out in screening newly posted bugs and working to ensure that a bug getse properly processed upstream
[06:27] <gnomefreak> is it safe to remove all ubuntu patches and build it?
[06:28] <asac> no :)
[06:28] <asac> it might be safe to drop all patches that do not effect a Makefile.in or configure.in
[06:28] <gnomefreak> makefile patch wasnt allowed
[06:29] <asac> but that is quite a shot in the dark :)
[06:29] <poningru> makefile?
[06:29] <asac> what?
[06:29] <poningru> what happened to mozconfig?
[06:29] <asac> does not exist :)
[06:29] <poningru> waah
[06:29] <gnomefreak> hold on let me see if i still have the errros.
[06:29] <asac> i plan to consolidate packages post feisty
[06:29] <asac> then I will use mozconfig
[06:29] <gnomefreak> poningru: all ubuntu packages need a make file or they wont be allowed in ubuntu
[06:29] <poningru> 0.0
[06:29] <asac> for now configure switches are carefully selected :)
[06:29] <poningru> ok did not know that
[06:29] <poningru> eek
[06:30] <asac> poningru: what is the source of scaryness?
[06:30] <asac> :)
[06:30] <poningru> has never tried building any moz packages without mozconfig
[06:30] <asac> poningru: ... its pretty much the same
[06:31] <asac> in debian/rules
[06:31] <gnomefreak> 50_arch_mips_Makefile_fix not applied to ./ .   was not gonna be applied and killed the build
[06:31] <poningru> ah
[06:31] <asac> configure is invoked with all the options
[06:31] <asac> that make -f client.mk would use
[06:31] <asac> gnomefreak: you can drop all mips/arm/m68k patches
[06:31] <asac> those are for architectures we don't have in ubuntu
[06:31] <poningru> ah gotcha
[06:32] <gnomefreak> http://gnomefreak.pastebin.ca/359237 were all the ones i had to remove
[06:32] <gnomefreak> the only one that would build was a font patch
[06:32] <asac> why?
[06:32] <gnomefreak> 91_fontsfix_359763
[06:33] <asac> all failed?
[06:33] <gnomefreak> asac: didnt ask it :(
[06:33] <asac> the output in pastbin is not a fail
[06:33] <gnomefreak> yes
[06:33] <gnomefreak> i can paste the failures if you like
[06:33] <asac> no ... if you say they failed
[06:33] <asac> then you are right
[06:33] <gnomefreak> applying patch 10_pangoxft_linkage to ./ ... failed.
[06:34] <asac> gnomefreak: what did you try? which upstreawm version?
[06:34] <gnomefreak> 2.0b2
[06:34] <asac> just the font patch applied?
[06:34] <gnomefreak> but it would fail 1 or 2 than i would remove them run it again failed another few and did that until all patches were gone
[06:35] <asac> hmm
[06:35] <asac> did you edit 00list
[06:35] <asac> ?
[06:35] <gnomefreak> thats the only one i didnt get an fail notice on i didnt try to build it after that
[06:35] <gnomefreak> yep
[06:35] <gnomefreak> removed patch than deleted it from 00list
[06:35] <asac> yeah ... then you are probably out of luck
[06:36] <asac> 70_single_typeaheadfind_package
[06:36] <asac> is needed
[06:36] <gnomefreak> k
[06:36] <asac> without that the typehaeadpackage will be messed up
[06:36] <gnomefreak> will try again to make sure :)
[06:36] <asac> otherwise ... will do it eventually ... but takes some time:)
[06:38] <gnomefreak> and it wouldnt let me name it bleh0ubuntu1+mt becasue of the ubuntu so i figured i wouod use dfsg
[06:38] <asac> hmm
[06:38] <asac> version would be 1.99+2.0b-0ubuntu1
[06:38] <gnomefreak> it said something about the maintainer didnt have a ubuntu address
[06:39] <asac> did you add yourself as maintainer?
[06:39] <gnomefreak> nope
[06:39] <gnomefreak> lol
[06:39] <asac> or just in changelog?
[06:39] <gnomefreak> changelog
[06:39] <asac> what did you do?
[06:39] <asac> took 1.5.0.9 package ... replaced upstream tarball ... changed changelog ... and what else?
[06:39] <gnomefreak> just added my the stuff to changelog and rules
[06:40] <gnomefreak> left control alone
[06:40] <asac> paste your chlog
[06:40] <asac> entry
[06:40] <gnomefreak> dont have it anymore :( since the patches wouldnt apply but im gonna redo it in a few monutes
[06:40] <asac> yeah ... probably just apt-get source
[06:41] <asac> replace upstream tarball
[06:41] <asac> change name of tarball in debian/rules
[06:41] <gnomefreak> yep
[06:41] <asac> tar up new orig :)
[06:41] <asac> use version as above
[06:41] <gnomefreak> no +mt?
[06:42] <asac> ah ... yeah use ... 1.99+2.0b-0ubuntu0+mt1
[06:42] <gnomefreak> k
[06:42] <gnomefreak> and remove patches as they fail?
[06:43] <asac> just remove from 00list
[06:43] <gnomefreak> k
[06:43] <asac> ok ... unavail for a few hours again :)
[06:44] <gnomefreak> keep maintainer feild with you
[06:44] <gnomefreak> have fun ill let you know how it goes later
[07:29] <gnomefreak> dpkg-source: error: Version number suggests Ubuntu changes, but Maintainer: does not have Ubuntu address.   is the error i get with 0ubuntu0+mt1
[08:16] <gnomefreak> asac: thats the error i get with your email in control.
[08:45] <dfarning> poningru, don't belive I have met you;)
[09:05] <dfarning> asac, ping
[09:26] <gnomefreak> @schedule
[09:27] <gnomefreak> grrrrrr
[09:29] <dfarning> @schedule
[09:29] <gnomefreak> the plugin is disabled in here
[09:30] <dfarning> just wondering what it did;)
[09:30] <dfarning> hows the build going
[09:31] <gnomefreak> im stuck. im working on the beta thunderbird and the versioning is clashing with asac's email as maintainer
[09:31] <dfarning>  some thing new to learn;)
[09:33] <gnomefreak> yep :)
[09:34] <gnomefreak> ok just pinged the guy i need
[09:36] <gnomefreak> i can change the package version but i kind of like the 0ubuntu0+mt setup as it is
[09:36] <dfarning> is the -mt portfix a permanent thing or just for testing
[09:37] <dfarning> postfix
[09:37] <gnomefreak> not sure im thinking permanent but would have to ask asac  on that
[09:37] <dfarning> ok
[09:38] <gnomefreak> wiki is slow as crap today :(
[09:38] <gnomefreak> agenda == https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Meetings please add to agenda with anything that needs to be discussed
[09:40] <dfarning> but i'll wait til you are done working on the page
[09:40] <gnomefreak> dfarning: i should be out of it
[09:41] <dfarning> ok thanks
[09:41] <dfarning> also going to work on the todo page
[09:41] <gnomefreak> cool
[09:41] <dfarning> going to add external contacts section
[09:41] <gnomefreak> i thin kwe have one already just not sure wher eit is
[09:41] <gnomefreak> poningru: whats your LP ID?
[09:42] <dfarning> so we know who is talking to who
[09:42] <gnomefreak> ok cool
[09:42] <dfarning> it is poningru i looked him up a few hours aga;)
[09:42] <gnomefreak> ah ok i had it but couldnt remember it
[09:45] <dfarning> i think several of us spamed mdz with trademark question a few days ago
[09:45] <dfarning> opps
[09:48] <dfarning> gnomefreak sticks to safe stuff like packaging the most popular application in the distro:)
[09:49] <gnomefreak> yep :) it works for me. i got the 2 thunderbird builds set so the replytolist works :)
[09:49] <dfarning> thank goodness we have asac to herd us. I was starting to worry;(
[09:52] <gnomefreak> ok fixed a link on the todo page
[09:52] <dfarning> ty
[09:53] <gnomefreak> hmmmmm
[09:53] <dfarning> I am subscribe to all of the wiki pages so i can follow changes
[09:55] <dfarning> I have asked Helio if he would be interest in maintaining our bughelper stuff
[09:56] <gnomefreak> has our changes been uploaded to bughelper or just on you local bughelper
[09:57] <dfarning> I have not yet committed our cluefile.
[09:57] <dfarning> I will do so. to figure out bzr if nothing else
[09:59] <dfarning> what do you mean
[10:01] <gnomefreak> a wiki on how to use bughelper for best results when it comes to mozilla bugs
[10:02] <dfarning> ok Ill add that to my todo list
[10:02] <dfarning> the really cool thing is the ability to scan for strings in attachment
[10:03] <gnomefreak> :)
[10:03] <dfarning> will help to find related crashes--after they are retraced
[10:15] <gnomefreak> what firefox release did you upload to feisty asac ?
[10:21] <gnomefreak> nvm seems to be 2.0.0.1+1-1 :)
[10:43] <gnomefreak> wth is wrong with linking
[10:44] <dfarning> on the wiki?
[10:45] <gnomefreak> yeah
[10:45] <dfarning> what problems are you having
[10:46] <gnomefreak> found a dead link and im trying to fix it no matter how i do it it shows up as the full link. here ill show you page let me save it
[10:46] <gnomefreak> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs
[10:46] <gnomefreak> the last section
[10:46] <gnomefreak> i tried  with [bleh]  and {{{  }}}
[10:46] <dfarning> checking
[10:47] <gnomefreak> here is the linking page https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/Procedures
[10:48] <gnomefreak> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/BugProcedures will make it show as link but its wrong link
[10:49] <dfarning> [https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/Procedures BugProcedures]  seem to work
[10:51] <gnomefreak> hm tried that
[10:51] <dfarning> it worked for me in preview
[10:53] <gnomefreak> its not showing up right here
[10:53] <gnomefreak> Visit https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/Procedures BugProcedures for an Introduction
[10:53] <gnomefreak> is how i see it
[10:56] <dfarning> try view the page now
[10:56] <dfarning> your lock times out so i save the change
[10:56] <dfarning> looks right here
[10:56] <gnomefreak> now it looks right. maybe it is my lock
[10:57] <gnomefreak> ty
[10:57] <dfarning> could be the wiki save really sloooowly
[10:57] <dfarning> yw
[11:04] <gnomefreak> asac: the new version of ff in feisty only had trademark changes?
[11:10] <asac> gnomefreak: the version in feisty is a repackaged package ... i worked hard to have nothing changed though :)
[11:10] <asac> anyone read bugmail today? are there new bugs introduced by this upload?
[11:11] <gnomefreak> well we have changes from what one reporter says
[11:11] <gnomefreak> i have atleast one
[11:11] <asac> let me know
[11:11] <asac> what has changed?
[11:11] <gnomefreak> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/85587
[11:11] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 85587 in firefox "[feisty]  Back/Forward buttons cease to work" [Undecided,Needs info] 
[11:11] <gnomefreak> bunch of crashes too but havent looked at what version yet
[11:12] <asac> can you reproduce?
[11:12] <gnomefreak> no
[11:12] <asac> can you purge firefox ... and install from feisty
[11:13] <asac> and see what happends?
[11:13] <Admiral_Chicago> can't reproduce either
[11:15] <gnomefreak> i tried it earlier before i commented on it
[11:16] <asac> yeah ... but you used your build?
[11:17] <asac> that might make a difference as the current package has been build on autobuilders
[11:17] <gnomefreak> ah ok ill try in a bit
[11:19] <gnomefreak> working through these crash reports with no info :(
[11:21] <gnomefreak> ok give me a minute
[11:22] <asac> sure :)
[11:23] <gnomefreak> im about to lose everything too
[11:25] <asac> hah?
[11:26] <Admiral_Chicago> talk to you all tomorrow
[11:26] <dfarning> have a good weekend
[11:27] <Admiral_Chicago> you too.
[11:27] <asac> bye
[11:27] <Admiral_Chicago> i'll be back sometime tomorrow but I'm going to be out and about
[11:38] <gnomefreak> the hell do they do that stupid shit
[11:39] <gnomefreak> in an hour or so i will beable to test it
[11:40] <Admiral_Chicago> good work gnomefreak. blew up my inbox but that's okay
[11:40] <gnomefreak> now everything is fucking crashing including hald and gdm and there are about 20 total
[11:40] <gnomefreak> im still getting crashes
[11:40] <gnomefreak> xorg
[11:41] <gnomefreak> *warning* DONT EVER REMOVE --PURGE FIREFOX WHILE ON GNOME
[11:41] <gnomefreak> ty Admiral_Chicago more to come i crashed before i could finish
[11:42] <gnomefreak> what is the agenda page?
[11:42] <gnomefreak> i have no browser installed atm since removing firefox take all other gecko browsers
[11:43] <Admiral_Chicago> gnomefreak: yes, that info is on wiki.ubuntu.com/firefoxnewversion
[11:45] <Admiral_Chicago> Warning: If you use this guide, do not remove the Ubuntu version of Firefox. Doing so will break the following packages: Yelp (help viewer), Epiphany, Gnome-app-install (Add Applications), Liferea, Blam and any application requiring the Gecko rendering engine.
[11:45] <gnomefreak> when was that changed?
[11:46] <gnomefreak> it used to only be 3-4 packages
[11:46] <gnomefreak> dont forget ekiga gnome-desktop-enviornment and so on
[11:46] <Admiral_Chicago> that info has been around, I cleaned up that page several wonts ago
[11:46] <Admiral_Chicago> months*
[11:47] <gnomefreak> gnome-core
[11:48] <dfarning> just a couple of the important ones;(
[11:49] <gnomefreak> doesnt understand why they have ff as a depend when ubuntu-desktop has it
[11:51] <gnomefreak> hint removing ff should not make X and gnome crash EVER
[11:53] <gnomefreak> dfarning: apt-cache policy show :)
[11:54] <gnomefreak> but they are mostlike reverse depends
[11:55] <gnomefreak> what was the bug number?
[11:55] <gnomefreak> ah i got it :)
[11:55] <dfarning> I meant add why are they depends
[11:55] <gnomefreak> asac: unable to reproduce
[11:56] <dfarning> do you guys have any stuff you would like me to do or followup on this weekend?
[11:57] <Admiral_Chicago> i'd say take a break and relax, after last weekend I am going to be a vegetable