[02:44] <poningru> thanks for the sata_promise thing
[02:44] <poningru> it works :D
[02:44] <BenC> did I do something? :)
[02:44] <BenC> Ah, cool
[02:45] <poningru> :D
[02:59] <Nafallo> BenC: is qc-usb trouble with the new kernel? or should I look in something other than ubuntu/ for it?
[03:00] <BenC> Nafallo: It's one of those things that wasn't working when I originally moved to the 2.6.19/20 tree's, so it wasn't included
[03:00] <BenC> maybe there's an update for it now
[03:00] <Nafallo> thought so.
[03:08] <Nafallo> looks like mandriva has it in there 2.6.20
[03:08] <Nafallo> gaah. to tired to spell :-P
[03:08] <Nafallo> their ofcourse
[03:09] <Nafallo> http://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/mandriva/devel/cooker/i586/media/contrib/release/kernel-tmb-source-2.6.20-2mdv-1-1mdv2007.1.i586.html
[03:10] <zul_> patch would probably be better
[03:10] <Nafallo> oki :-)
[03:10] <Nafallo> I'll try to work on it then :-)
[09:07] <H264> Hi
[09:13] <H264> anyone awake?
[10:13] <H264> hi
[11:24] <Nafallo> BenC: qc-usb works. just need to be added again. I just apt-get sourced qc-usb and compiled against our current headers
[11:48] <fdoving> are there plans to fix bcm43xx before feisty release? 
[11:50] <Nafallo> yes
[11:50] <Nafallo> AFAIK
[11:52] <fdoving> good thing. i've confirmed bug 85404
[02:33] <zul> BenC: its at 11 right?
[02:33] <BenC> zul: Yeah
[02:33] <zul> yippe skippe
[02:33] <BenC> Nafallo: Thanks
[02:34] <zul> hmmm...Power window kills 2 year old
[03:00] <secureboot_> when doing a build, how do I just build for 386, not everything?  I'm using 2.6.20-source from Fiesty
[03:02] <zul> secureboot_: check the wiki
[03:04] <secureboot_> zul: yeah, i'm doing that now - the flavours option, i presume?
[03:04] <zul> yep
[03:04] <secureboot_> is there a good way to see all possible flavours?
[03:05] <zul> check the debian/config but the flavours are generic,server,etc
[03:05] <secureboot_> zul: ah - i saw k7 as an example, and thought it was an arch designation
[03:06] <zul> its not
[03:06] <zul> not in fiesty
[03:06] <zul> but this channel is not for support
[03:10] <zul> BenC: the xen paravirt stuff is in mm tree fyi
[03:13] <BenC> zul: See if it applies against our tree?
[03:16] <zul> not yet
[03:16] <zul> but i can do it sometime today
[03:24] <crimsun> BenC: at your convenience, please pull in the pending HDA fixes I've emailed to your @ubuntu.com. There are also four pending patches sent Fri Feb 2 to kernel-team@ .
[03:25] <BenC> crimsun: The ones for kernel team are feisty?
[03:25] <BenC> crimsun: Note, I've pulled all the ones you sent directly to me
[03:25] <crimsun> yes.
[03:25] <BenC> ok, will do
[03:26] <crimsun> BenC: thanks. I believe Kyle asked me about them, so I resumed noting directly in the changesets. :)
[03:26] <kylem> morning.
[03:28] <Nafallo> afternoon kylem :-)
[03:28] <kylem> evening.
[03:49] <crimsun> BenC: apologies for pinging again, but ben.collins@u.c is preferred, correct? I don't see the ac'97, sigmatel or conexant ones I've sent there (at least according to gitweb via hera) on Feb 13, 14 & 17
[03:50] <BenC> crimsun: Try now, I just pushed my tree
[03:52] <crimsun> ok, thanks! (I probably need to wait a tick or two for the sync)
[05:02] <BenC> mjg59: ping, do you have time for kernel meeting in #ubuntu-meeting?
[05:07] <mjg59> BenC: Afraid not
[05:09] <BenC> mjg59: Any quick input on d80211?
[05:11] <mjg59> BenC: I think we ought to keep it, but possibly not as default
[05:11] <BenC> mjg59: Ok, sorry you couldn't make it
[05:11] <BenC> mjg59: Would you prefer I take you off the invite list, or are these meetings something you can make every so often?
[05:12] <mjg59> Daytime UTC is generally hard for me
[05:52] <crimsun> BenC: as a heads-up, my time is becoming more limited, but I'm working with Toby Smithe and Luke Yelavich to step in
[05:52] <crimsun> (they're already part of the LP ubuntu-audio team)
[05:52] <BenC> crimsun: Thanks for the info
[06:05] <Nafallo> :-)
[10:10] <kylem> we need to figure out how to evict lowlatency from the tree... it's kind of... annoying when doing a full build...
[10:10] <zul> but the number went up :)
[11:26] <jdong> if I would like to ask for new fglrx in Feisty, would a UVF be necessary?