[09:46] <bluffer_> i had a query yesterday in #ubuntu but the irc logs say no one has replied is some on up now and have a few minutes to spare
[09:46] <bluffer_> lamont 
[04:29] <JaccoH> anyone using the BNX2 module? im referring to bugreport 86965.
[04:31] <jbailey> BenC: Up for another round of talking about kernel modules shipped with packages? =)
[04:31] <BenC> jbailey: shortly
[04:32] <jbailey> BenC: All good.  Ping when ready.
[04:33] <BenC> jbailey: Ok
[04:35] <JaccoH> you box with kernel modules? :)
[04:36] <jbailey> JaccoH: Sure.  What's a scarier weapon than, say, ACPI? =)
[04:36] <JaccoH> you can like beat up the bnx2 module if you like :) 
[04:36] <JaccoH> piece o #$3 :)
[04:37] <JaccoH> mm anyway
[04:39] <zul> JaccoH: can you attach lspci -vvv to that bug as well?
[04:39] <JaccoH> besides the other lspci output you mean?
[04:39] <zul> yep
[04:39] <JaccoH> sure 
[04:40] <zul> ill have a look when i can
[04:47] <JaccoH> its pretty hard to get this info of of it .. the network is pretty much crappy :)
[04:55] <JaccoH> there you go zul
[04:56] <zul> thanks..
[04:57] <JaccoH> i first had to unset bonding.. cause I cannot work around the issue with bonding enabled
[05:02] <JaccoH> anyway .. speak to you all later .. getting myself some food :)
[06:03] <zul> BenC: ping
[06:04] <BenC> zul: yo
[06:04] <zul> 2.6.20 xen tree should be out today hopefully
[06:04] <BenC> nice
[06:04] <zul> gives me the weekend to play with it/package it
[07:11] <zul> BenC: it crashes from time to time so I dont know if we want to put it in the archive...
[07:25] <jbailey> BenC: Is "shortly" up yet? =)
[07:26] <BenC> jbailey: Just about :)
[07:26] <jbailey> Just making sure.
[07:27] <zul> heh getting your workout today arent you?
[08:58] <jbailey> BenC: *poke*
[08:59] <BenC> jbailey: Hey, I'm having a hard time staying at the keyboard...might be best over the weekend
[08:59] <jbailey> BenC: I'm conscious of the fact that at any item, I'm going on leave for 5 weeks.
[09:00] <jbailey> BenC: So I don't mind defering, but if I disappear, we'll need to get this sorted out anyway so that we can get the various commercial packages done that we're committing to.
[09:01] <BenC> ok
[09:05] <zul> BenC: how long are we waiting for a response from the user these days?
[09:06] <BenC> zul: I'm generally giving 30-60 days depending
[09:06] <BenC> if there's no response for the first inquiry, 30 days
[09:06] <BenC> if they've responded and then stopped, I give 60
[09:06] <BenC> but if there's enough info there, then I wont close it
[09:07] <zul> cool thanks
[09:38] <mgalvin> quick question... there are mactel kernel patches available at:
[09:38] <mgalvin> http://mactel-linux.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/mactel-linux/trunk/kernel/mactel-patches-2.6.20/
[09:38] <mgalvin> would those have been applied to the ubuntu kernel by any chance?
[09:41] <kylem> likely, yes.
[09:41] <kylem> but i don't recall for sure.
[09:42] <zul> i think they were applied early on in feisty
[09:42] <mgalvin> ah, cool, thanks
[11:41] <bdmurray> Howdy.  I ran across an interesting kernel bug in lp.
[12:10] <crimsun> which?
[12:16] <bdmurray> crimsun: kylem checked it out