/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2007/02/26/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

Admiral_Chicagoomg, you all destroyed my inbox12:24
gnomefreaksorry12:29
Admiral_Chicago:)12:29
gnomefreakwould like to add more but i dont think i can12:30
Admiral_Chicagohaha, no apologies neccesary, i just want to know what you did12:30
gnomefreakim gonna leave it for 30 minutes see if it ever gives me anything12:30
gnomefreakretraces12:30
Admiral_Chicagoautomatically?12:30
gnomefreakno using apport12:30
gnomefreakthan all the changes i have to make per bug cant be done in one interface12:31
gnomefreak98% of what you have in your box from me is all retraces12:32
Admiral_Chicagooh i see, i still am not sure what apport and bughelper do.12:32
gnomefreakapport is used in my case to pull debugging symbols out of coredumps12:33
gnomefreakso all the reports you see with (nodebiggong symbols found) or whatever it says i use apport to get them :)12:33
Admiral_Chicagooh cool.12:34
gnomefreakso we dont need user input as much (they dont need to run dbg)12:34
Admiral_Chicagoeven better.12:34
gnomefreakok who are the nitwits that keep marking upstream with no upstream bug and closing reports when they dont need to be closed?12:36
gnomefreakim getting real tired of this shit12:38
Admiral_Chicagonot sure I *just* got back to my desk12:38
Admiral_Chicagopower went out for the whole area.12:38
asacgnomefreak: .... i added upstream bugs without bug number :) ... closing don't know.12:38
asaclook advanced search12:39
gnomefreakit wasnt you12:39
gnomefreaksome guy trying to show hes working on bugs :( i had to reject 6 of them the past couple days12:39
asacin advanced search there is: "Show only bugs that need to be forwarded to an upstream bugtracker"12:39
gnomefreakthey werent even retraced yet :(12:39
asacthose without bug number pop up12:39
asacanyway, i did it to try that feature, but since there are not enough of those features, we need to use tags for now :)12:40
asack12:40
gnomefreakmight i suggest a tag for them. since we have other users doing it to so we dont get confused. i havent redone any of yours12:40
gnomefreakmt-needupstream?12:40
asactags for what?12:40
asacah12:41
asacthere is alrady one12:41
gnomefreakoh we are using it?12:41
gnomefreaki havent seen it yet12:41
asachttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/States#head-20d2a91720844f0d557f4dcf89321a0074734f57-312:41
asacfirst step in confirmed in case we think its upstream is12:41
asacmt-upstream12:41
gnomefreakk12:42
gnomefreakdo we remove it once upstream bug is found?12:42
asacif no bug is there mt-postupstream is used to show that someone should file one12:42
asacmt-confirm is again said12:42
asacwe have to ensure that upstream recognizes bug properly12:42
asacread description of state confirmed in wiki12:42
asacif you have questions ask12:42
asaci will fix doc then12:42
gnomefreakk12:43
asacjust 6 sentences :)12:43
asacwhen bug is properly processed upstream, its state "In progress" for us.12:43
asacas its out of our hand12:44
asacother then pinging upstream from time to time12:44
gnomefreakworks for me12:44
asacno more tags for now12:44
asacits already quite a lot to remember for time-to-time triagers12:45
asacthere should be better task descriptions so people can just work on what they want12:45
gnomefreakwish we had tasks to hand out but still not enough memebers example(people triaging bugs, people retracing bugs, ect...) but it will be a while i would say do what you can. i would like to take some work off your back if possible so you can focus on devel and upstream as main points12:47
asacyes probably right.12:48
asacbut good documentation might help people to become involved more easily12:48
=== gnomefreak dont mind taking simple patches from you ;)
gnomefreaktrue12:48
gnomefreak48minutes and its still not doing anything12:49
asachmm12:49
gnomefreakAdmiral_Chicago: you busy?12:49
asacmaybe the attachment names are ambiguous12:49
gnomefreakapport uploaded them12:49
asacmaybe two people attached report?12:49
gnomefreakbug 7104812:49
UbugtuMalone bug 71048 in firefox "Crash when removing private data" [Medium,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/7104812:49
gnomefreakoops12:49
gnomefreakno sorry bug 8785912:50
UbugtuMalone bug 87859 in firefox "[apport]  firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall()" [High,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/8785912:50
asacisn't this an edgy report12:50
asac?12:50
gnomefreakthe second one12:50
asacthought apport auto download works for report since feisty?12:50
gnomefreakthe first one listed was mistake12:50
Admiral_Chicagognomefreak: no. just getting through emails.12:50
gnomefreaki need retrace tests on bug 8785912:50
asacAdmiral_Chicago: just delete bug mail :) if its not of your bugs of course ;)12:50
Admiral_Chicagocan I help you with anything.12:51
Admiral_Chicagookay I'll look at that12:51
asacgnomefreak: file names look good. Don't know12:52
asacif apport still works on other bugs and those attachments can be downloaded .. wierd12:52
gnomefreaki might not need it try it though anyway it seems my load just got real heavy12:52
asacso are you picking unconfirmed sigsegv bugs?12:53
asacor sould i go through first?12:53
asacyou have a script you can add a bug list and things get auto done?12:54
asacwould that help?12:54
gnomefreakit would if it works and i know how it works12:56
asacwill you write one?12:56
gnomefreakits working now it took 55 minutes to connect to LP bug and start working :(12:56
asacor should i drop it?12:57
gnomefreaki dont know bash that well12:57
asacok12:57
asacgive me apport-retrace command12:57
asacwith some random bugnumber12:57
gnomefreaki can do simple little scripts like just run a few commands12:57
gnomefreakapport-retrace -s -v -d bug# 2>&1 | tee retrace.log12:58
gnomefreakthat is for feisty reports that have it attaches already unpacked12:58
gnomefreakthe edgy ones are gonna be a beast to make a script for12:58
asacdoes apport produce any garbage file in directory you are currently in?12:58
gnomefreaknope just the retrace.log that i end up attacjing12:59
gnomefreakattaching*12:59
gnomefreakto do edgy ones, they are done localy so you mkdir bug#88888 cd bug#88888 mkdir parts than wget <crashreport> than apport-retrace -o retrace.crash -v -d <crashreport> 2>&1 | tee retrace.log01:00
asachttp://people.ubuntu.com/~asac/multi-retrace.sh01:01
gnomefreakand with edgy if more than 1 report i cd bug#88888 than mkdir<usersname> cd <usersname> mkdir parts01:01
asaci think all with standard sigsegv summary should work01:01
asacwill produce retrace.$bugnumber.log in current directory01:01
asacfor each bug number given as argument01:02
gnomefreakcool nothing is there01:02
gnomefreakcool, nothing is there01:02
asacnothing?01:02
gnomefreaknvm01:02
gnomefreakit popped up01:02
asacif script does not work, let me know01:03
gnomefreakk01:03
gnomefreakty will try it soon as this one is done01:03
asaccool01:04
gnomefreakok did pre setup. on script so it should be multi-retrace bug#?01:09
gnomefreaklooks like its working :)01:13
gnomefreakit echoed the command01:13
asacyes01:24
asacgood ... already retrace.$bug.log  there?01:24
asacwhat kind of pre setup?01:25
gnomefreakchmod a+x script cp it into /usr/bin/local01:30
gnomefreak/usr/local/bin01:30
asacyeah01:32
asacor run sh ....sh :)01:32
asacso run it and go to sleep :)01:32
asaci can do that too ... now taht i have a 686 chroot01:33
gnomefreak:)01:33
gnomefreaki have someone complaing atm i cant go to bed yet01:34
asacoh01:36
asac;)01:36
gnomefreaki can ban anyone without the "it wasnt me someone hacked me" crap01:37
gnomefreakcant01:37
asacwho tells such stories?01:54
gnomefreakeveryone :(01:55
gnomefreakeagles0513875 > how was i i only asked a question 2 times in the chat01:56
gnomefreak19:32 <      gnomefreak+> sorry cant get into bt atm as you can see above to  show logs01:56
gnomefreak19:32 <   eagles0513875 > unless someone hacked my comp01:56
gnomefreakscript is working :)01:57
gnomefreaki think problem with LP is causing it to be so damn slow01:57
asacsure launchpad creeps day in day out02:00
=== AlexLatchford [n=alex@82-44-193-109.cable.ubr07.haye.blueyonder.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
AlexLatchfordhehe02:05
AlexLatchfordfinally made it over to Feisty02:05
AlexLatchforddarn the new Network manager is good02:05
gnomefreakasac: script worked like acharm :)02:10
gnomefreakAlexLatchford: look at your menus in gnome :)02:10
AlexLatchfordmeh?02:10
AlexLatchfordthe Control Centre?02:10
gnomefreakyep02:10
AlexLatchfordyeah I know its annoying..02:10
AlexLatchfordbut oh well02:11
gnomefreakvery much so02:11
=== hellcattrav [n=tmoney@ip70-174-174-217.dc.dc.cox.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
hellcattravadmiral chicago hello?04:18
Admiral_Chicagohey there04:18
Admiral_Chicagoopen up a terminal and try this... firefox --profile-manager04:19
hellcattravok04:19
hellcattravadmiral_chicago:  what am i looking for, FF started and its at my home page(google)04:20
Admiral_Chicagookay wait a second...04:21
hellcattravok04:22
Admiral_Chicagohellcattrav: try with a new profile  'firefox -ProfileManager' is the terminal...no quotes04:22
hellcattravwhat do you mean profile?04:25
hellcattravi typed firefox --Profile-Manager in the konsole, would you like me to take the - out between profile and manager?04:26
Admiral_Chicagohellcattrav: firefox -profilemanager04:26
poningruor -P04:28
Admiral_Chicagoyup04:28
hellcattravok04:29
hellcattravi get teh same thing, it goes to homepage04:30
hellcattravis it supposed to be somethign different?04:30
Admiral_Chicagohellcattrav: how did you install fx?04:31
hellcattravaptitude install firefox04:32
Admiral_Chicagookay.04:32
hellcattravi used apt-get to install it the first time and then to remove it and the second time i installed it i did it with aptitude04:32
Admiral_Chicagothat's fine. hmm, what command did you run ?04:34
hellcattravjust now...? i04:38
hellcattravor with the firefox -profileManager?04:38
Admiral_Chicagohellcattrav: yes, what the last command you put in a terminal04:39
hellcattravlitterly firefox -profilemanager   just like that04:40
Admiral_Chicagofirefox -p04:41
hellcattravhuh?04:41
Admiral_Chicagoactually in a terminal do 'sudo killall firefox-bin && firefox -p'04:42
Admiral_Chicagono quotes04:42
hellcattravok04:44
hellcattravwhat does this do?04:44
Admiral_Chicagomake sure profile manager comes up, we want to make sure that its not your profile causing allthi04:45
hellcattravoh04:45
hellcattravwhats the &&?04:45
Admiral_Chicagolinks commands04:45
hellcattravok, now what04:45
poningruAdmiral_Chicago: good call04:46
hellcattravok i see firefox choose user profile04:47
hellcattravwhat am i looking for?04:47
hellcattravoh it also gave me some sort of error04:47
hellcattrav Error: BadDevice, invalid or uninitialized input device 16604:48
hellcattrav  Major opcode:  14404:48
hellcattrav  Minor opcode:  304:48
hellcattrav  Resource id:  0x004:48
hellcattravFailed to open device04:48
hellcattravX Error: BadDevice, invalid or uninitialized input device 16604:48
hellcattrav  Major opcode:  14404:48
hellcattrav  Minor opcode:  304:48
hellcattrav  Resource id:  0x004:48
hellcattravFailed to open device04:48
hellcattravhello?04:51
hellcattravhello>04:53
hellcattravis someone there?04:53
=== asac_ [n=asac@debian/developer/asac] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
asachello11:22
gnomefreakthat looks like he is on kde with those errors11:22
gnomefreakther eis a work around for it. its not a ff issue its kde issue11:23
asachi ... what are you doing here?11:23
gnomefreakhello asac11:23
asacwhat time is it?11:23
gnomefreaksleep working :)11:23
gnomefreakits 5:23am11:23
asacoh man ... you should probably smoke some pot or something ;)11:23
gnomefreakyour really gonna love what i got for you today ;)11:23
gnomefreakDone downloading11:24
gnomefreak--- stack trace ---11:24
gnomefreak--- thread stack trace ---11:24
asacoh ... thats not much11:24
gnomefreakdonedoh11:24
gnomefreakits a 64bit :(11:24
gnomefreakyou want it?11:25
asaccan you assign?11:25
gnomefreakyep ;)11:25
gnomefreakits all yours11:25
asacdamn11:27
asac693 bugs11:28
asactotal11:28
asacopen11:28
gnomefreakmost of those should be ready to be summarized. i will go through the unconfirmed bugs and get them started11:28
asacok ... for now there are just two bugs assigned with retrace for me11:29
asaclooks like i could handle them :)11:29
asacyou already tried to summarize?11:30
gnomefreaki can find more for ya11:30
gnomefreakno not yet was working on retracing lastnight11:30
asacwhat the script helpful?11:30
asaccould you just run and go away?11:30
gnomefreakyep :)11:31
asacfine11:31
gnomefreakbug 8794211:32
UbugtuMalone bug 87942 in firefox "[apport]  firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV in raise()" [High,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/8794211:32
gnomefreakah ok11:32
gnomefreakthats yours11:32
gnomefreakthought it was another number11:32
asacbug 86414  ... is mine too?11:36
UbugtuMalone bug 86414 in firefox "[apport]  firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV in raise()" [High,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/8641411:36
asacprobably yes11:36
asactaking11:36
gnomefreakasac: you want them something like bug 87956?11:39
UbugtuMalone bug 87956 in firefox "firefox crashed several times unexpectidly [@gtk_style_realize] " [Undecided,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/8795611:39
asacsomething like?11:45
asacyou mean how summary is written?11:45
asacusually just11:46
asacfirefox crash [@...] 11:46
asacshould be enough11:46
asacs/several times unexpectidly//11:46
gnomefreakok11:53
gnomefreakwhat do we do if out of 3 reports on one bug only one is gtk_style?12:00
asacthe rest?12:05
asacdepends12:05
asacif other reports show up something else, we will forget about gtk_style report .. .because we have others for that12:06
gnomefreakk12:06
asacif we have three different stacktraces in one bug12:11
asacwe should open new bugs for each stack12:11
asacand declare the original bug to be owned by some random stack12:12
asacand rememberr to subscribe the report reporter to the new bug12:12
gnomefreakok that sounds reasonalbe12:13
gnomefreakfor new reports as stated above. Do you want stacktrace and orig. crash log?12:31
asacstacktrace should be enough ... but only if its nearly zero work to copy it out of log12:58
gnomefreakim adding link tot he comment to orig. crash report01:03
=== gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
=== Admiral_Chicago [n=Freddy@ubuntu/member/admiral-chicago] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
=== poningru [n=poningru@adsl-074-245-140-197.sip.gnv.bellsouth.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
=== joejaxx [i=joejaxx@ubuntu/member/joejaxx] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
=== asac [n=asac@debian/developer/asac] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
asachmm01:08
asacapparenlty i was offline01:09
=== gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
asacgnomefreak: have you been offline too?01:33
gnomefreaknetsplit01:33
gnomefreaki than restarted irssi by mistake01:33
gnomefreakbug 86002   <<< asac01:34
UbugtuMalone bug 86002 in firefox "[apport]  firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall()" [High,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/8600201:34
asacah01:35
asacyeah ... we already had that one01:37
asacdidn't we?01:37
asacexact same site in backtrace01:37
gnomefreaknot sure ive seen it a few times01:37
asachttp://www.rockradioaz.cz/azlive.php?choice=001:38
asacwe have tested it yesterday01:38
asacor did we talk aabout the same bug01:38
asac?01:38
gnomefreaksame guy too iirc01:38
gnomefreakwe did that was the one i got the popup dialog to accept to play the stream01:39
gnomefreakbut i never crashed on it01:39
gnomefreakI think we need to use mt-needsummary as a single tag. right now we add it to tags mt-needreport/mt-needretrace. cause going through these alot dont have reports attached01:40
asacuse01:41
asacfirefox crash in java [@JavaPluginFactory5::CreateSecureEnv]  [@ProxyJNIEnv] 01:41
asacok ... makes sense01:42
gnomefreakk01:42
asacwill stop adding double tags then :)01:42
gnomefreakme too01:42
gnomefreakam i still here?01:59
gnomefreakthats weird :(02:00
ajmitchgnomefreak: no02:02
asacmozilla folks are sometimes ... aehm ... weird :)02:07
asacpush a follow-up advisory sunday night ... after release: http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/02:07
gnomefreakajmitch: freenode pinged me again so i was wondering if i lost connection02:12
gnomefreakasac: well than 2.0.0.2 im guessing is #1 piority for you than :)02:14
gnomefreakthats not a good announcment IMHO02:14
gnomefreakwell good they see it and announce it02:15
asacyeah ... have to find CVE id for that new announcement before i can release02:19
asacotherwise our automatic security check will not be able to verify that this issue is fixed for us02:20
gnomefreakah02:22
=== gnomefreak out for a bit.
=== joejaxx [i=joejaxx@ubuntu/member/joejaxx] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
=== poningru [n=poningru@adsl-074-245-140-197.sip.gnv.bellsouth.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
=== Admiral_Chicago [n=Freddy@ubuntu/member/admiral-chicago] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
=== ajmitch [n=ajmitch@ubuntu/member/ajmitch] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
=== Ubugtu [n=bugbot@ubuntu/bot/ubugtu] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
=== asac [n=asac@debian/developer/asac] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
=== gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
=== rhelmer [n=rhelmer@people.mozilla.com] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
=== \sh_away [n=nnnnnnnn@server3.servereyes.de] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
=== crimsun [n=crimsun@pdpc/supporter/silver/crimsun] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
asachmm splitting all away02:52
asacwhat is package name of proprietary flash player?04:07
gnomefreakflashplugin-nonfree04:16
gnomefreakor do you mean stand alone?04:16
asacno04:16
asaci cannot find it04:16
asacwhat repo?04:16
gnomefreakswflash i believe is the stand alone flash player and flashplugin-nonfree is plugin in mulitverse04:16
gnomefreakmultiverse04:16
gnomefreakasac: you wont have it on 64bit04:17
gnomefreakjust like i wont have 64bit packages in my repos :(04:17
asachehe04:17
asacright :)04:17
asacsecond time i ran into this trap04:17
asac:)04:17
asacso no flash player tests for me :(04:18
asacbut java6?04:18
=== pradeep [n=pradeep@59.92.86.243] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
asacnot in edgy :(04:19
gnomefreaknope just feisty04:19
gnomefreakunles syou install it from feisty or java :(04:19
asacwhat package is it?04:19
asaccan i unsubscribe from ubuntu-bugs when in QA team?04:21
gnomefreaknot sure04:23
gnomefreakin feisty its sun-java6-jre or plugin or bin04:23
gnomefreaksun-java6-plugin installs all of the above04:23
pradeepHello, can someone please confirm bug 64844 ?04:23
UbugtuMalone bug 64844 in firefox "Firefox starts very slowly" [Low,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/6484404:23
asacno04:24
asac:)04:24
pradeepWhat more info does that need?04:25
asacnot exactly info, but a tester who can show up and help to test here throughout the process of tackling this :)04:25
asacso if you volunteer, we can confirm it :)04:25
pradeepok so if there are no volunteers, it will remain open?04:26
asacmaybe you could profile both applications and post the statistics, so we can see where the time is used?04:26
asacnot exactly ... if i (or some other team member) comes around and can reproduce this, then i will confirm04:27
asacbut that might take a little longer04:27
gnomefreakcould that be pango?04:28
asacperformance?04:28
gnomefreakas weve found out in dapper that pango caused ff to run slower than official build04:29
asaclots of options ... pango might be one, but we load more .so files at startup, which upstream links in statically04:29
gnomefreaktrue04:29
asacanother option is, that we use flat chrome layout while upstream uses jarred up chrome04:29
gnomefreaktestcase == strart disabling options till you find it :)04:29
asacwe would have to test all options to see04:30
gnomefreakstart*04:30
asacno04:30
asacyou can disable pango by04:30
asacexport MOZ_DISABLE_PANGO=104:30
asacpradeep: does this improve startup for you?04:30
pradeepsec04:31
asacpradeep: do:04:31
asacexport MOZ_DISABLE_PANGO=104:31
asacfirefox04:31
asacin the console04:31
asacpradeep: how to you measure the startup time?04:31
gnomefreakasac: you opinion on bug 44016 when you get time (going for smoke)04:31
UbugtuMalone bug 44016 in firefox "grep: /var/lib/locales/supported.d/*[^~] : No such file or directory" [Undecided,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/4401604:31
asacgnomefreak: is mt-needtestcase04:33
asacupdated comment04:33
asacpradeep: if you have tested this, does the time diff decrease if you compare second run results?04:35
gnomefreakok taking break from mt-summary and doing a few retraces :)04:40
pradeepasac, it's fluctuating...sometimes it's low sometimes high: 2.80s-3.20s range04:42
asack04:42
asachow about pango ... any improvement?04:42
pradeepthat's what I said, it varies between tests04:43
asacok ... 2.8-3.2s absolute time or time diff?04:43
gnomefreakis this default home page or is this a user set homepage?04:43
=== gnomefreak wopnders if reporter has set different home pages. (would test both with default mozilla page to get diff in times)
asacpradeep: is homepage different for mozilla.org and ubuntu install?04:45
pradeepasac, 'user' time04:45
pradeepdefault ubuntu04:45
gnomefreakubuntu.com might be slower to render than mozillas default04:45
asaccan you try to set both homepages to the same page04:45
pradeepisn't the default one a local file?04:46
asace.g. set some custom homepage for you profile04:46
asac?04:46
asacwhat is mozilla.org default one?04:46
pradeepfile:///usr/share/ubuntu-artwork/home/index.html04:46
pradeepmozilla.com for the vanilla one04:46
asacpradeep: so ... *vanilla* is user time: '2.176s'; *disabled pango* is '3s'; *all default* is '4.8s' ?04:50
asaccan you still reproduce these values?04:50
pradeepasac, it's a higher value with a home page set04:51
pradeep3.76s (pango enabled), 3.31s (disabled)04:52
=== asac still wonders how you stop the timer in a reproducible fashion
asacanyway, if you are subscribed to the bug and you stay available for further tests, we can move this to confirmed04:53
asacdone04:56
asacpradeep: at some point i might ask you to test preview packages, please provide feedback, so we can find the cause of this.04:56
pradeepasac, thanks for confirming04:58
asacnp ... stay tuned :)05:01
gnomefreakasac: you have about 100+ emails most are due to that damn gtk retraces thing (its too damn early to think05:04
asacgnomefreak: GREAT ...w ill look05:06
=== pradeep [n=pradeep@59.92.86.243] has left #ubuntu-mozillateam ["Leaving"]
asaclp is damn slow :/05:13
gnomefreakyep05:13
=== Admiral_Chicago [n=Freddy@st074039212101.monm.edu] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
gnomefreakthose are done :)05:26
gnomefreakfor now atleast05:26
asacgnomefreak: 2.0.0.2 bits for i38605:26
asacare there for testing in people.ubuntu.com/~asac/mt-feisty/05:26
asacthose are the ones that will probably go up05:27
gnomefreakok downloading now05:28
gnomefreakwill install when im done with feisty retraces for the day05:28
Admiral_Chicagoasac: is that a testing 2.0.0.2 repo?05:47
asacfor now ... actually those are send up ... so its more a last minute testing repo05:55
gnomefreakit has a ./ or /. at the end?05:56
Admiral_Chicagoclass now05:57
asac./05:59
asachttp://www.asoftsite.org/apt-archives.html :)05:59
gnomefreakty06:00
asacgnomefreak: we really need someone who can reproduce one of those gtk_style crashes06:00
asacit is said that it crashes after one closes a tab with a plugin like totem installed06:00
asace.g. on side where video is embedded06:01
gnomefreakthere are so many of them do we really need to?06:01
asacyeah06:01
asacwe have to verify if a fix fixes it06:01
asaci have a patch at hand, but it is not clear if and which variants it fixes06:01
gnomefreakdo we have a step by step example for one of them06:02
asacif not, we probably should try to fix it on our own, as upstream appears to be out of resources here.06:02
gnomefreaki can work on it today if we have one with link that crashes and so on06:02
gnomefreaki can try it in between house work while im getting ready for my trip on thursday06:03
asacty06:03
gnomefreakasac: is ther ea bug with a good testing instructions?06:18
asacnot that i have seen06:19
asacnavigating to site with embed video, then closing tab and opening filedialog on other tab (via save link as) ... might do :)06:20
gnomefreakAttempted to load file chooser dialog from gmail file attachment button. not very helpful nad is same stack as the rest of the gtk things06:20
asacyes ... as i said ... close a tab with running video before06:21
asacor other embedded plugin (flash??)06:21
asacthen open file chooser via link06:21
asacor drag a link to/from gnome desktop06:21
asacsomething that causes a restyle :)06:21
asac(don't ask me how :))06:22
asacthose are my best guesses from what i have red so far06:22
gnomefreakok06:22
asaci have no flash player plugin, ... and i don't know a site where video is embedded06:22
asacbtw, totem destructor patch is already fix released by seb12806:23
asacso we might now be able to reproduce this bug with totem again :)06:23
gnomefreaktrue06:24
=== gnomefreak doesnt seem to be crashing at all :(
asacwhich site do you use?06:33
gnomefreaki was using youtube06:34
gnomefreakhint flash06:34
asacwhere is a totem site?06:37
gnomefreakdont know off hand i dont really watch movies from online. too much buffering with slow net connection06:37
poningruwhen are we releasing 2.0.0.2?06:37
gnomefreaksoon06:38
poningruif there is anything I can do...06:38
gnomefreakponingru: test a firefox crash :)06:42
asacponingru: search for gtk_style_realize ... and try to figure out how to reproduce ;)06:43
poningruyes sir06:43
poningrus06:43
asacthere are a hundreds of duplicates ... so it should be possible ;)06:44
poningruon lp.net right?06:44
asacyeah ... firefox source06:44
asachttps://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bugs?field.searchtext=gtk_style_realize&orderby=-importance&search=Search&field.status%3Alist=Unconfirmed&field.status%3Alist=Needs+Info&field.status%3Alist=Confirmed&field.status%3Alist=In+Progress&field.status%3Alist=Fix+Committed&assignee_option=any&field.assignee=&field.owner=&field.status_upstream=&field.status_upstream-empty-marker=1&field.omit_dupes.used=&field.omit_dupes=on&field.has_patch06:45
asacbetter  (shorter url):06:45
asachttps://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bugs?field.searchtext=gtk_style_realize&orderby=-importance&search=Search&field.status%3Alist=Needs+Info&assignee_option=any&field.assignee=&field.owner=&field.status_upstream=&field.status_upstream-empty-marker=1&field.omit_dupes.used=&field.omit_dupes=on&field.has_patch.used=&field.tag=mt-confirm06:45
asacwhen watching embedded video06:47
asacand bookmarking a page opened in another tab i get06:47
asaclots of 18:47:11: ERROR: move_display_object() -- can't find object at depth 306:47
asacin console06:48
asacbookmarking: dragging page into bookmark menu06:48
asacmaybe it happens only on feisty?06:52
asacare there reports on edgy for this stack too?06:53
gnomefreaknot sure im using feisty06:53
gnomefreakyes06:53
gnomefreakif you mean the gtk one06:53
gnomefreakjust tryed the gmail one with gtk issue and it works fine for me06:57
gnomefreaki tried 10ish and still cant reproduce any of these as they state to do it07:02
asachmm07:03
asaci hate field tests ... we should actually be able to reproduce such a common crash ... damn07:03
gnomefreakhere bug 70411 has decent instructions and i cant reproduce it at all07:04
UbugtuMalone bug 70411 in firefox "Firefox Crash [@gtk_style_realize] " [Medium,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/7041107:04
gnomefreakeven a link07:04
asachttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35987007:04
UbugtuMozilla bug 359870 in Plug-ins "crash on style reset after closing tab with xembed plugin" [Critical,New] 07:04
asacmaybe this helps07:05
asacthere is a brief outline07:05
asacthough this might not be our bug07:05
gnomefreaktotem hasnt crashed for me since i patched totem07:06
gnomefreakfx and totem work fine here together07:06
asachmm ... maybe it just doesn't happen on gnome because all styles are already initialized?07:06
asacany hint in those reports that at least some have kde?07:07
gnomefreakdont know there are so many ways to reproduce this (seems like they are all differnet)07:07
gnomefreakno07:07
gnomefreaknot one that i saw and i saw alot of them this am07:07
asacyeah ... maybe ping a few about desktop environment specs?07:08
asacwhat theme they are using, etc.07:08
asace.g. firefox theme + gnome theme .... if kde07:08
Admiral_Chicagoor version.07:11
Admiral_Chicago3.5.6 would have some bug fixes over 3.5.507:11
gnomefreakasac: problem there is kde doesnt use gtk by default07:12
asacyes but if firefox installed it is used07:12
gnomefreakyou have to install firefox07:12
Admiral_Chicagoit does handle gtk07:12
asacmaybe styles are not setup properly from the beginning07:12
asacthus my guess07:12
Admiral_Chicagoit even has options about how to handle GTK apps07:13
gnomefreakAdmiral_Chicago: not by default you have to install gtk libs or qt-gtk something cant think of package name07:13
asacAdmiral_Chicago: can you reproduce the bug?07:13
Admiral_Chicagowhich one.07:13
asacany gtk_style_realize bug07:13
gnomefreakpick one there is only like 200 of them :(07:13
asachttps://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bugs?field.searchtext=gtk_style_realize&orderby=-importance&search=Search&field.status%3Alist=Needs+Info&assignee_option=any&field.assignee=&field.owner=&field.status_upstream=&field.status_upstream-empty-marker=1&field.omit_dupes.used=&field.omit_dupes=on&field.has_patch.used=&field.tag=mt-confirm07:13
Admiral_Chicagookay let me see07:13
asacAdmiral_Chicago: what i understand is this:07:14
asacsomething like you need some plugin running (embedded) and need to trigger a gtk restyle07:14
asacthey appear to be able to do that by opening some dialog (e.g. file-picker, or other warning)07:15
asacor by dragging bookmarks07:15
asaci cannot see any crash here07:15
asacconsole output though shows some ERRORs07:15
Admiral_Chicagoyou mean Fx calls GTk to do some action and crashes?07:15
Admiral_Chicagofor example, create a new window.07:15
asacno ... gtk decides that it has to initialize some more styles07:15
asacthen it tries to restyle a ffox widget that cannot deal with it07:16
asachowever the decision to restyle is triggered by one of the actions above07:16
asacthat is sure07:16
asacfile-picker, warning other dialog ... or dragging07:16
Admiral_Chicagoyea i'm looking at the gtk bugs now.07:16
asacdon't think its a gtk bug07:17
asacrestyle is a valid operation ... but ffox hand-crafted widget for embed objects cannot properly deal with it07:17
Admiral_Chicagois there anything upstream?07:17
asacyes07:17
asacone or two07:17
asachttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35987007:18
asacthat is one07:18
UbugtuMozilla bug 359870 in Plug-ins "crash on style reset after closing tab with xembed plugin" [Critical,New] 07:18
Admiral_Chicagoi've tried to drag links and all but that don't recall crashing ever07:18
gnomefreaki cant seem to reproduce any still07:18
asacyes07:18
asacbut with plugin running07:18
gnomefreakcould the totem fix cause us not to reproduce?07:19
asacor a tab with embed plugin (totem, flash) closed just before?07:19
asacdon't know ... did reports of this issue stop?07:19
asacit might really be a follow up crash of totem trashing memore in destructur07:19
asacbut i doubt it is07:19
Admiral_Chicagoi am running mplayer though07:20
=== gnomefreak doubts it too but would be nice if i could crash it
asacwe have reports for flash too07:20
asacon this07:20
Admiral_Chicagohaha, you hope to crash Fk :)07:20
Admiral_Chicagoerr Fx.07:20
Admiral_Chicagoreally? flash causing this?07:20
Admiral_Chicagoor making it come out?07:20
asaci saw reports about flash running and totem07:20
asacnot cause ... it triggers a bug in plugin impl of firefox side07:21
asacat least thats what i understand07:21
Admiral_Chicagoi wonder if I can crash it by installing totem and trying to play a video.07:21
asacnot just playing07:21
asacmaybe playing in background07:21
asacand dragging in some other tab07:22
Admiral_Chicagookay i'll try that once apt is done with its operation07:22
asaci think you have at least to close one instance of tab with totem running to trigger07:22
asacso play video before07:22
asacclose tab ... then cause restyle07:22
gnomefreaklow memory causing gtk windows to not draw correctly causing crash?07:23
gnomefreakplaying video is  a load on cpu/mem07:23
Admiral_Chicagoi have a gig in my box atm07:23
gnomefreaki have 256 and cant crash it no matter what i do07:24
Admiral_Chicagowell maybe we can rule that out. what are minimum requirements for Ubuntu...128?07:25
gnomefreakyep07:25
asacdon't think that we have so many crashes from users with low memory07:26
asachttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24153507:27
UbugtuMozilla bug 241535 in Plug-ins "Assertion failure on destroying XEmbed plug-in" [Normal,New] 07:27
asacthat one has a patch07:27
asacis the second one that might be related07:27
asacits referred in initial description from the other bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35987007:28
UbugtuMozilla bug 359870 in Plug-ins "crash on style reset after closing tab with xembed plugin" [Critical,New] 07:28
asacSteps to reproduce (taken from07:29
asachttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210151 ):07:29
asac0) Install totem plugin, start firefox07:29
asac1) Go to a site with movie links, for example07:29
asachttp://digital-desert.com/mpg-videos/07:29
asac2) Open a non-movie link in a new tab, close the new tab [not sure this step is07:29
UbugtuRed Hat bug 210151 in firefox "Totem-mozilla plugin crashes firefox" [Normal,New: ] 07:29
asacnecessary] 07:29
asac3) Open a movie link in a new tab; wait for it to load in the totem plugin;07:29
asacclose the tab07:29
asac4) Right-click the movie link, Save Target As07:29
asaccan someone confirm a crash here?07:29
Admiral_Chicagoyup i'm looking at that now. have to wait for apt...slow network07:30
asacmaybe trying multiple times07:30
=== asac has to get some food -> shopping
gnomefreaki reproduced it on 2.0.0.207:31
Admiral_Chicagoi don't have .2 but I want it. this bookmark thing is driving me nuts07:32
gnomefreakhttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35987007:33
UbugtuMozilla bug 359870 in Plug-ins "crash on style reset after closing tab with xembed plugin" [Critical,New] 07:33
gnomefreakfollowing that crashed me07:33
gnomefreakAdmiral_Chicago: its on asac repo07:33
gnomefreakits not final though07:33
asacgnomefreak: can you redo?07:33
gnomefreakyes07:33
asaccan you redo with previous?07:34
gnomefreakfollowing upstream instructions07:34
Admiral_Chicagognomefreak: i figured but that discussion was while i was in class. maybe i'll look up his bazaar branch07:34
gnomefreaki will install and try07:34
gnomefreakAdmiral_Chicago: deb http://people.ubuntu.com/~asac/mt-feisty/ ./07:34
gnomefreakis the repo07:34
Admiral_Chicagocool. thanks07:34
asacofficial build should land too every minute07:35
asachttps://beta.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/2.0.0.2+1-0ubuntu107:35
Admiral_Chicagoblah, my network won't finish this update for a while07:35
asacstill building07:35
asacfoir i38607:36
Admiral_Chicagowell then i'll look at this bug after class.07:36
=== gnomefreak not gonna send crash report in
asacso previous crashes too?07:58
asacwhat trace do you have?07:58
asacthe filepicker one?07:58
gnomefreakhold on ill try to get it08:07
gnomefreakoh well guess im retracing it08:08
asac:)08:08
asacmaybe you can reproduce with bookmark drag in the end too?08:09
asace.g. instead of save file as .... as last step, drap url to bookmark panel/menu ?08:09
asacsorry, but i don't see any crash here.08:09
asacmaybe 64 bit08:09
gnomefreakno i tried bookmark08:10
gnomefreaki cant reproduce book mark but there might be more to it. the upstream bug has good instructions for the one i reproduced08:10
asacmaybe in redhat btsa08:11
asacbts08:11
asaci crashed now on edgy too08:15
asacbut no crash report for me08:15
gnomefreakasac: i dont see anything in stack about file picker08:38
asacpaste08:39
asacpls08:39
gnomefreakok let me get a pastebin open08:39
gnomefreak#22 0xb6c5d38d in nsFilePicker::Show (this=0x8809a00, aReturn=0xbfeeadac)08:40
gnomefreakfound it still pasting though08:41
asacj08:41
asaccan you search for nsFilePicker::Show and update bug description with testcase from bugzilla?08:41
asacthere should be already a master bug with nsFilePicker::Show in title08:41
gnomefreaklook in upstream bugs?08:42
gnomefreakhttp://gnomefreak.pastebin.ca/373402 heres most of it08:42
asacone click too much for the horde08:43
asacso which bug is the master bug?08:44
asacok  found08:44
asacthe closed one08:44
gnomefreakim on upstream and that search returns everything but what the search is for :(08:45
asachehe08:46
gnomefreakmozilla 31465208:46
UbugtuMozilla bug 314652 in Widget: Gtk "Crash when opening a new file / saving page with Firefox 1.5 Beta2 on HPUX [@ nsFilePicker::Show] " [Critical,Unconfirmed]  http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31465208:46
asacalready searched a good bunch08:46
asacfound not much that was ours08:46
gnomefreakthat doesnt look like mine but might be08:47
asacyeah don't search for new filepickers please08:47
asac:)08:47
gnomefreakoh08:47
asacthe upstream bug is yours08:47
asacwe need bugs for bookmark drag08:47
asacthat crashes in gtk_style_realize08:47
asacor link drag08:47
asacor other drag08:47
asacbut they don't have any08:47
asacmaybe you will find08:50
asacsearch for xembed instead of gtk_style_realize08:50
asacor something :)08:50
asacthe bad ... if its fixed on trunk, they close bug, though still open for us08:54
gnomefreakthis is the one i followed to get it to crash. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=359870   i was unable to get bookmark crash08:55
asacif luck we can still find duplicates, but not original bugs if closed08:55
UbugtuMozilla bug 359870 in Plug-ins "crash on style reset after closing tab with xembed plugin" [Critical,New] 08:55
asacyep08:55
asaci pasted description to MASTERCRASH summary :)08:55
asacwill try patch from it08:55
asacand you can try if its gone08:55
asacwill build a build that includes that patch + a patch to fix theme switch crashes08:56
gnomefreakk08:56
asaci don't thin that the patch in related bug really fixes this08:56
asacthough would be nice :)08:56
asacmaybe the drag et al stuff will still crash08:57
asacbut we cannot reproduce08:57
asac:(08:57
gnomefreaktony comes in i think08:58
gnomefreakim gonna try to repro this crash on 2.0.0.108:58
=== tonyyarusso [n=anthony@ubuntu/member/tonyyarusso] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
asacgnomefreak: ty08:59
gnomefreakyw08:59
tonyyarussoasac: Hi there :)08:59
asachello08:59
gnomefreaki cant even get it to play on 2.0.0.108:59
asacwhat?08:59
asacany sane reason for that?09:00
asacdid you properly downgrade?09:00
gnomefreakcant get mpg to play :( let me try a few otheres09:00
gnomefreakyes09:00
asactonyyarusso: you maintain some mozilla app?09:01
tonyyarussoasac: not sure how much you've been told already, but I've been attempting to package something called KompoZer, a stopgap bugfix of Nvu.  It works on x86 and amd64 currently, but the one PPC machine I have access too failed.09:01
tonyyarussoSo, no, I don't maintain yet, but if I can get it to build and can get a UVF exemption I will.09:01
asacwhat did fail?09:01
asacbuild?09:01
asacdon't think that new upstream packages are accepted atm09:02
asacanyway .. having it in the long run is good09:02
asacdoes it include all mozilla code or do you link against firefox-dev ?09:02
tonyyarussoYeah, trying to build a .deb from the source package fails.  From what I can tell, it seems to be attempting to run an x86 binary partway through the process, and I have no idea why.09:03
tonyyarussoIt includes mozilla stuff, standalone.09:03
asachmmm ... probably you miss a patch09:03
asacis it ppc64 ?09:03
tonyyarussoThe particular machine I used, yes.  Dual G5 ppc64.09:04
asacthen its reasonable09:04
asacwait09:04
tonyyarussoI have a collection of patches from edgy's nvu package, but I'm not sure how to tell which have been applied and which have not yet, so that is a very likely explanation.09:05
tonyyarussoI did have to use one already to build on amd64.09:05
asacah ... drop them09:05
asacat least all architecture specifics09:05
asacif nvu comes from debian its a piece of shit :) from package state pov09:05
gnomefreakits unmaintained09:06
asacafaik it never made it do debian testing/stable09:06
tonyyarussoNeither is in debian atm.09:06
asacso what mozilla version does it use as base?09:06
tonyyarussoI think it's the same as firefox 1.0 or 1.5 - not the newest anyway.09:07
asacok09:07
asactry add to debian/rules09:07
asac+ifeq ($(DEB_BUILD_ARCH),ppc64)09:07
asac+       OPTFLAGS = -mminimal-toc09:07
asac+endif09:07
asacthose lines (of course without +)09:07
tonyyarussoOkay - and what does that do?09:08
asac--- firefox-1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.9.orig/security/coreconf/Linux.mk09:08
asac+++ firefox-1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.9/security/coreconf/Linux.mk09:08
asac@@ -56,6 +56,10 @@09:08
asac        OS_REL_CFLAGS   = -DLINUX1_2 -D_XOPEN_SOURCE09:08
asac        CPU_ARCH        = m68k09:08
asac else09:08
asac+ifeq ($(OS_TEST),ppc64)09:08
asac+       OS_REL_CFLAGS   = -DLINUX1_2 -D_XOPEN_SOURCE09:08
asac+       CPU_ARCH        = ppc6409:09
asac+else09:09
asac ifeq ($(OS_TEST),ppc)09:09
asac        OS_REL_CFLAGS   = -DLINUX1_2 -D_XOPEN_SOURCE09:09
asac        CPU_ARCH        = ppc09:09
asac@@ -119,6 +123,7 @@09:09
asac endif09:09
asac endif09:09
asac endif09:09
asac+endif09:09
asac LIBC_TAG               = _glibc09:09
asacthat patch is probably the most important one09:09
asacit sets CPU_ARCH variable properly09:09
asacotherwise it will go x86 road ... as you observed09:09
asacadding this patch might help you09:09
tonyyarussoI'll have to change the filename, no doubt.09:10
gnomefreakok found out why and i fixed it. i got it to crash. had to downgrade the libs with firefox09:10
asacmaybe patch -p1 < patchfile.diff09:10
asacwill do it09:10
asacif you are inside your mozilla tree09:10
asacits more likely that it does not apply cleanly if you are not from 1.5 branch09:10
asacdoes your package use dpatch?09:11
tonyyarussoasac: not yet at least09:11
asachttp://people.ubuntu.com/~asac/90_ppc64-build-fix.dpatch09:11
gnomefreaki still have upstream tar for that might be a bit old but if you want to look at it i can upload it for you09:12
asactry to use that patch09:12
asacjust download09:12
asacand then09:12
asacpatch -p1 < /tmp/90_ppc64-build-fix.dpatch09:12
asacinside your dir09:12
tonyyarussook09:12
tonyyarussowith regard to the other patches I have, which may or may not still be necessary - the upstream dev was going to check for me soon hopefully, but how can one tell if they've been applied or not?09:13
tonyyarussoAs they were patches to fix things in Nvu, and KompoZer exists to fix things in Nvu.09:13
asacdon't know09:14
asacwithout a case09:14
asaci would do this:09:14
asacuse latest unmodified kompozer09:14
asacand drop all patches from ubuntu so far09:14
asacthen add patches as needed09:14
asacat best use dpatch or cdbs right ahead09:14
asacits just not worth to fix it09:14
tonyyarussoRight09:15
tonyyarussoOne other thing:09:15
asacif you use dpatch you can pull almost all patches from debian iceape i would suggest09:15
asacor icedove09:15
asacok09:15
tonyyarussoThe way things are currently, a whole pile of image files get put in /usr/lib instead of /usr/share, which makes lintian have a small aneurism.  Is there any reasonably simple way to fix that on my end, or does that have to be upstream?09:16
asachow does your file system structure look like?09:16
asac/usr/lib/kompozer/icons ... ?09:16
tonyyarussoWorse...naming consistency are not us.09:16
asaclook how firefox does it ... usually you link all directories that contain indep files to a dir in /usr/share/... and then just move files before packaging things up.09:17
asaccan you paste file list of instlal somewhere?09:17
tonyyarusso/usr/lib/nvu-0.77/{icons,res} are the offenders.09:17
asacyes09:17
asacthat is fine09:17
asacyou probably have .../chrome too09:17
tonyyarussoyeah09:17
asacthose should go to /usr/share as well09:17
asacand if you are anal ... also all .js files in components/09:17
asacbut those are not really needed imo09:18
asac:)09:18
asaclook how firefox does it09:18
asaclook in firefox.install ... firefox.links09:18
asacfirefox.dirs maybe as well09:18
tonyyarussoSo, I move the files, add symlinks for the dirs, and diffing it to the .orig.tar.gz does the rest?09:18
asacno09:18
asacyou move it on in package only09:18
asacyou run make install DESTDIR=debian/myapp/09:19
asacthen you use myapp.install to not install debian/myapp/usr/lib/myapp/icons in /usr/lib/myapp/, but in /usr/share/myapp/ instead09:19
tonyyarussoah, ok09:19
asacdo you run make install at all in debian/rules?09:19
tonyyarussoYeah - I'll get the line09:20
asacyes ... and then you add a link from usr/lib/myapp/icons to usr/share/myapp/icons ... so your app won't notice09:20
asacin myapp.links :)09:20
asacyeah ... you probably should fix the versioned dir thing too09:20
tonyyarussothis should be it:   cd mozilla && $(MAKE) install DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/install09:21
tonyyarussoThere's a patch for that I think.09:21
asacwe want it in /usr/lib/kompozer ... not in /usr/lib/kompozer-version/09:21
asacyes09:21
asacfine09:21
tonyyarussoyep09:21
asacyou can also look at mozilla-thunderbird09:21
tonyyarussoand certainly not /usr/lib/nvu....silliness09:21
asachas dpatches too09:21
asacyes09:21
asacmight be right09:21
asac<<- the install tidr09:22
gnomefreakwhy me :(09:22
asaci think you should use09:22
asac$(MAKE) -C mozilla/ install DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/install09:22
asacinstead09:22
asacnot cd before09:22
tonyyarussosure09:23
gnomefreakmost people dont know how to use apport to pull info out of a coredump and people pming me left and right now have thier coredumps removed from LP09:23
asacto remove because of privacy issues?09:23
asacyeah ... imo there should be a *BIG* warning in apport09:23
asactonyyarusso: you should try to push upstream to support building against system installed mozembed libraries09:24
gnomefreakasac: yeah09:24
asaceach mozilla app ships so much duplicated code they should better link against existing libs09:25
gnomefreakbig warning == noone attaching coredump we cant retrace.09:25
asacgnomefreak:  ... sure ... but most don't know09:25
asacits a security and privacy hazard09:25
gnomefreaktrue09:25
tonyyarussoasac: I can mention it, but I'm doubtful.  He intends this to be a temporary solution, just a stopgap bugfix, until Daniel Glazman finishes Composer2 (using XULrunner), so he's said he's hesitant to do very significant changes.09:25
asaci would find it fair to educate them09:25
asacapport should do retrace locally09:26
asacand don't submit coredump imo09:26
asacah ok09:26
gnomefreakwould be nice if it did09:26
asactonyyarusso: fine09:26
asacif they plan to switch to xulrunner, then its good09:26
tonyyarussoyup09:26
asacgnomefreak: i think its the best... the user has all libs, it does not generate much waste after runing ... so why not09:26
asacjust submit stacktraces09:27
asacto a stacktrace db09:27
gnomefreaki agree but it would have to be done right away in that case since you cant rely oon user to run command09:27
asacsure09:27
asacalways ... for every crash report ... if the user clicks submit: retrace, submit, done09:28
gnomefreaknext time you talk to martin pass it by him ;) if i do it he will tell me to make it do that :(09:29
asacany bug rampage from new upload in sight?09:29
asacotherwise, i would stop for today09:29
asaci will raise it09:29
asacdefinitly09:29
asaci first have to figure out, what is already in work09:29
asaci think it should be given higher priority ... not because of better stacktraces, but more because of user security and privacy issues09:31
=== gnomefreak pretty much done for today its 15:30 and i have alot of other shit to get done before thursday
asacyeah ... go ahead ... take a break ;)09:32
asacyou already did too much for last few weeks09:32
=== gnomefreak waiting for email from matt revell and cleaning up emails and crap
gnomefreakif i didnt it would double for me when i got home09:32
=== gnomefreak keeps eyes open for tb 1.5.0.10 still
asacguess not this week09:34
asacprobably in two weeks09:34
asacif ever09:34
asacthere are just a few java script crashes fixed that might be security relevant09:34
asacso no problem for them ... and for me too :)09:35
asactonyyarusso: when do you expect to start repackag your app?09:36
tonyyarussoasac: I'll get back at trying to fix those things within a few hours, after I've done some other stuff to apease my mom.09:36
asaci ask, because i currently work on the future mozilla app blueprint package :) ... so all mozilla apps get to a single packaging standard etc.09:36
tonyyarusso*appease09:37
tonyyarussoaaah09:37
tonyyarussoThat would be very handy09:37
asaci plan to consolidate firefox/thunderbird in feisty+109:37
asacand we need to add seamonkey to universe too imo09:37
asacas well as sunbird and lightning09:38
tonyyarussoI'm still kind of hoping I might be able to get an exception to get into feisty, but if not I'll release standalones for feisty and get on feisty+1 instead.09:38
gnomefreaklightning?09:38
tonyyarussoLightning would be nice.09:38
tonyyarussocalendar extention09:38
gnomefreakah09:38
asaci think unless your package is at really good state with most recent mozilla codebase, i guess you will not get exception09:38
asacat least I wouldn't grant one09:38
tonyyarussoNeeds ONE feature, IMO.  Keyboard shortcut to add/remove from the window, like the contacts sidebar.09:38
gnomefreakasac: can we make them all like tb with the archives folder?09:39
asaci work on prototype09:39
asacwill be much better then thunderbird09:39
asacbut will have embedded tarball probably09:39
asacbut cdbs09:39
asacwith dpatch09:39
gnomefreaktb == easy09:39
asacnot dpatch alone09:39
gnomefreakah good09:39
asacmaybe i will even use quilt instead of dpatch, because its a bit more comfortable. but depends how mature quilt module for cdbs is09:40
asacstay tuned ... guess in two weeks or so i will have firefox 3 as blueprint :)09:41
gnomefreaki might be bring pc with me on thursday cause its looking like ill be gone for about a month so i may be in and out not steady like i am now though09:42
asacthat would be great09:42
asac:)09:42
asacok ... cu maybe tommorow09:43
gnomefreaki should be here09:44
gnomefreakout for a bit.09:44
=== dfarning [n=dfarning@s3-165.rb2.lax.centurytel.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
asachi david10:10
=== Admiral_Chicago waves
dfarningHey how are you?10:12
asacgreat ... wanted to be off ... but now i am here again for a few minutes :)10:13
dfarningIs everything going ok10:13
asaci really think upstream relationship to adobe is really possible in the near future10:13
asacisn't10:13
asac:)10:13
asacbut why do gnashers think we are a bit evil?10:14
dfarningAll  we need is a little more market share for adobe to jump on board;)10:14
dfarning18 million users instead on 'only' 8 million;)10:15
Admiral_Chicagoyup, but I think getting them quality crash reports will improve our relations10:15
asacreally ... they gave numbers?10:15
asacor is that just your guess?10:16
Admiral_Chicagoor helping them triage a bit if they want volunteers10:16
dfarningwe are willing to work with propriatry flash10:16
asacAdmiral_Chicago: how do you want to triage closed source?10:16
dfarningjust makin up those numbers10:16
Admiral_Chicagooh ya....haha just realized that10:16
asacstill ... near future ... not possible, right?10:17
dfarningwho would have thought 8 million is too small to worry about10:17
asacfor gnash we still have debian upstream10:17
asaci would have told you if you asked10:17
asac:)10:17
asacanyway ... my guess is you don't get to the right persons10:18
asacdon't want to go in detail10:18
dfarningI agree10:18
asacbut i think its all a matter of who you can reach. If you find the right person, things might go fast10:18
dfarningthat is what happened with linspire10:18
asacotoh, adobe is in what way?10:19
asacups10:19
asac:)10:19
asacerase that line10:19
asacin what way?10:19
dfarningups?10:19
asacoops10:19
asac:)10:19
asacgnash is still maintained at debian, isn't it?10:20
asacaren't they a good enough upstream for now?10:20
dfarningto triage closed source I would like to be able to id that the problem lies with their package.  Then send all of the necessary stuff so that they can run retrace them selves and fix the problem.10:22
asacwe cannot verify ... because we cannot see10:22
asacsome might be obvious related to their software, some might be not.10:22
asacwho packages it for ubuntu?10:23
asacflashplayer-nonfree i mean?10:23
dfarningcrimson i think10:23
asaccrimsun ?10:23
dfarningI'll look10:23
dfarninghttps://beta.launchpad.net/~crimsun10:25
asacyou know if i can disable beta for longer than 2 hours?10:25
dfarningwith regard to gnash,  when I was filling upstream bugs I tried to file them with both debian and their upstream so as to not piss off the debian guys with our issues10:27
dfarningnot sure about the beta issues10:27
asacdfarning: you have some bugs we filed at gnash?10:30
dfarningno, not yet that we my policy when firefox was iceweasle and you were not here to shepard those issues.10:32
dfarnings/we/was/10:32
asacok ... we have gnash issues that are ready for submission?10:33
asacdid not even take a look at gnash so far10:33
dfarningI'll follow this up with an email10:34
=== dfarning goes to get more coffee
asacok ... looking at malone for gnash, there are not many issues filed10:35
asacbug 86547 ... is a real deep recursion10:36
UbugtuMalone bug 86547 in gnash "Gnash crashed when trying to open last.fm "play" from Firefox" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/8654710:36
asaclooks like stack overflow10:37
gnomefreak@schedule new_york11:03
UbugtuSchedule for America/New_York: 26 Feb 18:00: Community Council | 27 Feb 15:00: Technical Board | 27 Feb 18:00: New York LoCo Team | 28 Feb 13:00: Accessibility Team | 28 Feb 15:00: Edubuntu | 28 Feb 17:00: Xubuntu11:03
gnomefreakoh thats at 611:03
gnomefreakdid everyone say ok to march 6th at 20:00 UTC for hte meeting?11:10
gnomefreakthe*11:10
Admiral_Chicagoworks for me.11:11
Admiral_Chicagoi have midterms that week, no promises11:12
=== dfarning agrees
dfarninggnomefreak: will you be around to run it?11:13
gnomefreakdont count on it11:13
dfarningok11:13
gnomefreaki wont know til than. i asked alexL if he would chair in my place unless you want to do it11:13
dfarningOk cool I was thinking of either freddy or alex11:14
Admiral_Chicagoi don't mind chiring11:14
dfarningI would rather not because I don't want to be viewed as a dictator11:14
Admiral_Chicagobut i think Alex said he didn't mind11:15
gnomefreakdfarning: oh come on screw them ;)11:15
Admiral_Chicago:(11:15
poningruI for one welcome dfarning as our dictator11:15
dfarningand I would rather not put add more stuff to alexanders todo list;)11:15
dfarningwe really need to keep him heatlhy11:15
poningrunaah work him to death, replace with new mofo bitch11:16
dfarningWell yes, but we need him to teach us how first;)11:16
=== gnomefreak trying to keep him working on building but bugs are getting to get to me
=== ..[topic/#ubuntu-mozillateam:gnomefreak] : Welcome to the home of the Ubuntu Mozilla Team | Web-Home is: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam | totem anti-crash preview is at: http://gnomefreak.youmortals.com/Totem/ | Next meeting will be on March 6th 2007 at 20:00UTC | Meeting agenda is at: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Meetings
dfarningAdmiral_Chicago: so we can count on you to set up the meeting?  If you can't make it we will ask Alex.11:19
gnomefreaki put in the request for the fridge already too so it should be there by mid week (i would think)11:20
Admiral_Chicagobetter ask alex, i'm swampped with work now11:20
dfarningman you are quick!  I just noticed that you updated the wiki!11:20
gnomefreaki have 5 retraces atm that i will work on getting done before i leave :)11:20
gnomefreaki already asked him but will remind him.11:20
dfarningAdmiral_Chicago: ok will do so11:20
gnomefreakdfarning: trying to get things set up before i dont have a pc to do it :)11:21
dfarningthanks gnomefreak11:21
gnomefreaknp11:21
Admiral_Chicagoty11:21
=== dfarning off to take a look at packages hooks again;(
gnomefreakdfarning: oh btw about the traigers i think i emailed you about it. it WOULD be nice if we can get them to stop doing stupid crap and having to go behind the same people11:22
gnomefreakover and over and over again :(11:22
dfarninggnomefreak: could you forward the bug issue reports if you get a chance.  I'll see what we can do11:24
gnomefreaki dont have them anymore that i would beable to find in the crap that ive done11:25
gnomefreakdfarning: took me about 30minutes a day fixing what others do and explaining to them why11:25
gnomefreaknext few i see ill foward to you11:25
dfarningty11:26
gnomefreakyw11:26
=== ryanh [n=ryanh@gateway.linspire.com] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
=== theresab [n=root@gateway.linspire.com] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
gnomefreakwasnt someone from our team going for membership?11:53
gnomefreakor is it just me?11:53
dfarningI was hoping the Alex would;)11:54
gnomefreakah thats right he is still waiting for the useless thing :()11:54
gnomefreakoh damn i totally miss read theresa's nick and was reading mail at same time :(11:55
gnomefreakwelcome linspire people :)11:56
theresabHello!11:56
poningruwth11:56
ryanhHello11:56
=== poningru waves at the linspire people
gnomefreaksomeone tell asac to stop working11:57
ryanhI am Ryan... who would have guessed?11:57
=== gnomefreak after i figured out theresab;s nick
theresabRyan is our QA Lead.11:58
=== ryanh waves
=== gnomefreak waves
dfarningtheresab: did you see the article at http://www.itwire.com.au/content/view/9927/1090/11:58
dfarningpretty well stated11:59
=== gnomefreak will be in meeting for next 16 1/2 hours :( its the CC meeting
tonyyarussolol11:59
theresabDavid: No, thank you for passing it on.12:00
tonyyarussoLinspire people?  cool12:00
tonyyarussotheresab, ryanh: I'm new on this team (though not to Ubuntu), as I recently started attempting to package KompoZer, the unofficial (for now?) stopgap bugfix for Nvu.12:01
poningrutonyyarusso: hey man glazman is working on it12:01
tonyyarussoponingru: The thing after it, yeah.  This is meant to be a temporary solution until Glazman finishes his project (as Nvu is unsupported by him now and that leaves folks in a bit of a limbo for now)12:02
dfarningryanh: are you familar with apport new crash anc bug reporting system?12:02
gnomefreakthat name is becomming very evil to me12:03
ryanhheh12:03
gnomefreakbecoming*12:03
ryanhdfarning, cannot say I am.12:03
gnomefreakapport is fun for the first 500 retraces12:03
dfarningit is a new system that automatically reports crashes and bugs to our issue tracker12:04
=== gnomefreak heads for smoke before the meeting
ryanhhttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/Apport12:05
dfarningI am working on adding a feature so that it detects which repo a package has come from and redirect the issue report to the proper tracker12:05
theresabTonyyarusso:  I am aware of the efforts of KompoZer and Nvu 1.1 are you working with Brian T here at Linspire on this effort?12:05
poningruoh thats right12:05
tonyyarussotheresab: I haven't spoken to him yet, no.  I only just reached Fabien a few days ago.12:06
poningrudidnt linspire give some monies to glazman for nvu?12:06
tonyyarussoContact info welcome :)12:06
ryanhdfarning, thats pretty cool12:07
tonyyarussoponingru: I think it was some sort of contracted work, yes.12:07
theresabtonyyaruss: We have been in touch with Fabien.12:07
tonyyarussoSo he mentioned.  He was hoping to figure out what to call it soonish and get back to me.12:08
=== dfarning off to cc meeting i'll follow up with an email on the apport information for ryanh tonight
theresabsend Brian and email and introduce yourself - brian@linspire.com12:08
theresabthanks David.12:08
ryanhthanks12:08
gnomefreakdfarning: you have tiem12:08
ryanh=)12:08
gnomefreakdamn typing sucks tonight12:09
tonyyarussotheresab: Will do, thanks.12:09
dfarningyea, making Ubuntu derivative friendly is at the top of my list to solve bug #112:10
UbugtuMalone bug 1 in ichthux "Microsoft has a majority market share" [Critical,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/112:10
ryanhAgreed12:10
gnomefreakgood dfarning you solve bug #1 and ill take care of rest ;)12:10
ryanhI like your bug bot12:10
ryanhheh12:10
tonyyarussotheresab: btw, is there any chance you're aware of issues building nvu/kompozer on PPC?12:10
=== gnomefreak doesnt like bug 1
gnomefreaktonyyarusso: yeah its ppc12:11
tonyyarussoCrazy thing tried to run an x86 binary partway through the build I did last time, which clearly doesn't work.12:11
theresabtonyyarusso:I have requested Brian to join us.12:12
tonyyarussoHaven't tried asac's patches yet - they might work.12:12
gnomefreakmost of his patches have worked so far :)12:12
=== gnomefreak trusts them
tonyyarussoI'm just trying to get as much different input at a time as possible between builds at this point, since having to wait half an hour for it to compile before it finally errors out gets old really fast...12:13
dfarningryanh: do you have time for a call this  week?  I would like to explain apport in more detail.12:13
=== LinspireBrian [n=brian@gateway.linspire.com] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
gnomefreakhi brian12:14
tonyyarussoHi LinspireBrian12:14
LinspireBrianHello there12:14
LinspireBrianI'm busy trying to get my boss lady off of her root shell when running irc12:15
ryanhhah12:15
LinspireBrianyou know us evil Linspire folk12:16
poningrueek12:16
ryanhdfarning, If its okay, I would prefer next week12:16
ryanhtrying to release an alpha snapshot on Thursday12:16
LinspireBriantonyyarusso, I hear you have interest in packaging the next nVu based on the KompoZer base?12:16
tonyyarussoLinspireBrian: I guess I can do my introduction here then:  My name is Tony, and I just picked up on KompoZer (Fabien's project), attempting to package it for Ubuntu (and possibly Debian if all goes well/they want it).  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TonyYarusso for more info on me and such.  Currently my issue is getting it to build on PPC.12:17
dfarningryanh: ok next week is fine.  Let me know what time is good12:17
tonyyarussoYes.12:17
LinspireBriantonyyarusso, I had trouble getting it to link on an i686 box12:17
ryanhyour PST, yes?12:17
LinspireBriantonyyarusso, we don't doo PPC so I hadn't seen that12:17
LinspireBrianDid you get the tarball I sent with all the nVu branding changes back in place?12:17
dfarningcentral12:18
tonyyarussoLinspireBrian: Not yet, no.12:18
tonyyarussoLinspireBrian: So that means it was decided to let it be Nvu 1.1 officially then?12:18
LinspireBrianlet me send that on so you don't duplicate work, not that there was a lot to it but still12:18
LinspireBrianyes12:18
tonyyarussocool12:18
LinspireBrianas long as noone on your end has an issue with that12:18
tonyyarussoI did get it to build and run on 686 on this machine - haven't tested extensively, but it looks fine.12:19
LinspireBrianWe no longer fund Daniel on it so it has somewhat stagnated12:19
tonyyarussoShould be okay, with a little explanation (ie, "yes, we said Nvu was unsupported now - ignore that)12:19
LinspireBriancan you message me your email?12:19
LinspireBrianI saw that nVu sucks message :-)12:19
=== theresab [n=theresa@gateway.linspire.com] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam
tonyyarussoLinspireBrian: No need for msg really - this nick at ubuntu.com works fine :)12:20
LinspireBrianim paranoid these days12:20
LinspireBrianI gave out my email once and got 4 spam messages today12:20
tonyyarussoUnderstandable - I just don't bother.12:21
=== tonyyarusso adds linspire.com to allowed domains
LinspireBrianmight not want to do that, you may get inundated with Linspire Letters :-)12:22
LinspireBrianforwarded the url to the nvu tarball12:23
tonyyarussoThanks12:23
LinspireBrianshould include the strange link error we saw, if it doesnt, please lmk12:23
LinspireBrianim fairly ld illiterate12:23
tonyyarussoCould you describe what sort of link error?12:23
tonyyarussoI had to do some weird symlink stuff b/c of the nvu/kompozer naming inconsistency, but other than that it was ok.12:24
LinspireBrianyes, let me go find it.  it doesnt appear to be in that email.  Some googling revealed only one other person with the problem when compiling mysql and no apparent fix12:24
ryanhdfarning, is 2pm pacific on Monday okay?12:25
asachi all12:26
ryanhhello12:26
dfarningsounds good to me12:26
LinspireBrian`__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx':12:26
LinspireBrian: multiple definition of `__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx'12:26
LinspireBrian/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/3.3.5/crtbeginS.o(.gnu.linkonce.t.__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx+0x0): first defined here12:26
LinspireBrian../util/Linux2.6_x86_glibc_PTH_OPT.OBJ/secdig.o(.gnu.linkonce.t.__i686.get_pc_thunk.cx+0x0): In function `__i686.get_pc_thunk.cx':12:26
LinspireBrian: multiple definition of `__i686.get_pc_thunk.cx'12:26
LinspireBrianLinux2.6_x86_glibc_PTH_OPT.OBJ/nssinit.o(.gnu.linkonce.t.__i686.get_pc_thunk.cx+0x0): first defined here12:26
LinspireBriancollect2: ld returned 1 exit status12:26
dfarningryanh: best number is 608-781-194112:27
tonyyarussoDefinitely didn't see that.12:27
tonyyarussoHowever, Linux2.6_x86_glibc_PTH_OPT.OBJ is implicated in the PPC build issue.12:27

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!