[12:24] omg, you all destroyed my inbox [12:29] sorry [12:29] :) [12:30] would like to add more but i dont think i can [12:30] haha, no apologies neccesary, i just want to know what you did [12:30] im gonna leave it for 30 minutes see if it ever gives me anything [12:30] retraces [12:30] automatically? [12:30] no using apport [12:31] than all the changes i have to make per bug cant be done in one interface [12:32] 98% of what you have in your box from me is all retraces [12:32] oh i see, i still am not sure what apport and bughelper do. [12:33] apport is used in my case to pull debugging symbols out of coredumps [12:33] so all the reports you see with (nodebiggong symbols found) or whatever it says i use apport to get them :) [12:34] oh cool. [12:34] so we dont need user input as much (they dont need to run dbg) [12:34] even better. [12:36] ok who are the nitwits that keep marking upstream with no upstream bug and closing reports when they dont need to be closed? [12:38] im getting real tired of this shit [12:38] not sure I *just* got back to my desk [12:38] power went out for the whole area. [12:38] gnomefreak: .... i added upstream bugs without bug number :) ... closing don't know. [12:39] look advanced search [12:39] it wasnt you [12:39] some guy trying to show hes working on bugs :( i had to reject 6 of them the past couple days [12:39] in advanced search there is: "Show only bugs that need to be forwarded to an upstream bugtracker" [12:39] they werent even retraced yet :( [12:39] those without bug number pop up [12:40] anyway, i did it to try that feature, but since there are not enough of those features, we need to use tags for now :) [12:40] k [12:40] might i suggest a tag for them. since we have other users doing it to so we dont get confused. i havent redone any of yours [12:40] mt-needupstream? [12:40] tags for what? [12:41] ah [12:41] there is alrady one [12:41] oh we are using it? [12:41] i havent seen it yet [12:41] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/States#head-20d2a91720844f0d557f4dcf89321a0074734f57-3 [12:41] first step in confirmed in case we think its upstream is [12:41] mt-upstream [12:42] k [12:42] do we remove it once upstream bug is found? [12:42] if no bug is there mt-postupstream is used to show that someone should file one [12:42] mt-confirm is again said [12:42] we have to ensure that upstream recognizes bug properly [12:42] read description of state confirmed in wiki [12:42] if you have questions ask [12:42] i will fix doc then [12:43] k [12:43] just 6 sentences :) [12:43] when bug is properly processed upstream, its state "In progress" for us. [12:44] as its out of our hand [12:44] other then pinging upstream from time to time [12:44] works for me [12:44] no more tags for now [12:45] its already quite a lot to remember for time-to-time triagers [12:45] there should be better task descriptions so people can just work on what they want [12:47] wish we had tasks to hand out but still not enough memebers example(people triaging bugs, people retracing bugs, ect...) but it will be a while i would say do what you can. i would like to take some work off your back if possible so you can focus on devel and upstream as main points [12:48] yes probably right. [12:48] but good documentation might help people to become involved more easily === gnomefreak dont mind taking simple patches from you ;) [12:48] true [12:49] 48minutes and its still not doing anything [12:49] hmm [12:49] Admiral_Chicago: you busy? [12:49] maybe the attachment names are ambiguous [12:49] apport uploaded them [12:49] maybe two people attached report? [12:49] bug 71048 [12:49] Malone bug 71048 in firefox "Crash when removing private data" [Medium,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/71048 [12:49] oops [12:50] no sorry bug 87859 [12:50] Malone bug 87859 in firefox "[apport] firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall()" [High,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/87859 [12:50] isn't this an edgy report [12:50] ? [12:50] the second one [12:50] thought apport auto download works for report since feisty? [12:50] the first one listed was mistake [12:50] gnomefreak: no. just getting through emails. [12:50] i need retrace tests on bug 87859 [12:50] Admiral_Chicago: just delete bug mail :) if its not of your bugs of course ;) [12:51] can I help you with anything. [12:51] okay I'll look at that [12:52] gnomefreak: file names look good. Don't know [12:52] if apport still works on other bugs and those attachments can be downloaded .. wierd [12:52] i might not need it try it though anyway it seems my load just got real heavy [12:53] so are you picking unconfirmed sigsegv bugs? [12:53] or sould i go through first? [12:54] you have a script you can add a bug list and things get auto done? [12:54] would that help? [12:56] it would if it works and i know how it works [12:56] will you write one? [12:56] its working now it took 55 minutes to connect to LP bug and start working :( [12:57] or should i drop it? [12:57] i dont know bash that well [12:57] ok [12:57] give me apport-retrace command [12:57] with some random bugnumber [12:57] i can do simple little scripts like just run a few commands [12:58] apport-retrace -s -v -d bug# 2>&1 | tee retrace.log [12:58] that is for feisty reports that have it attaches already unpacked [12:58] the edgy ones are gonna be a beast to make a script for [12:58] does apport produce any garbage file in directory you are currently in? [12:59] nope just the retrace.log that i end up attacjing [12:59] attaching* [01:00] to do edgy ones, they are done localy so you mkdir bug#88888 cd bug#88888 mkdir parts than wget than apport-retrace -o retrace.crash -v -d 2>&1 | tee retrace.log [01:01] http://people.ubuntu.com/~asac/multi-retrace.sh [01:01] and with edgy if more than 1 report i cd bug#88888 than mkdir cd mkdir parts [01:01] i think all with standard sigsegv summary should work [01:01] will produce retrace.$bugnumber.log in current directory [01:02] for each bug number given as argument [01:02] cool nothing is there [01:02] cool, nothing is there [01:02] nothing? [01:02] nvm [01:02] it popped up [01:03] if script does not work, let me know [01:03] k [01:03] ty will try it soon as this one is done [01:04] cool [01:09] ok did pre setup. on script so it should be multi-retrace bug#? [01:13] looks like its working :) [01:13] it echoed the command [01:24] yes [01:24] good ... already retrace.$bug.log there? [01:25] what kind of pre setup? [01:30] chmod a+x script cp it into /usr/bin/local [01:30] /usr/local/bin [01:32] yeah [01:32] or run sh ....sh :) [01:32] so run it and go to sleep :) [01:33] i can do that too ... now taht i have a 686 chroot [01:33] :) [01:34] i have someone complaing atm i cant go to bed yet [01:36] oh [01:36] ;) [01:37] i can ban anyone without the "it wasnt me someone hacked me" crap [01:37] cant [01:54] who tells such stories? [01:55] everyone :( [01:56] eagles0513875 > how was i i only asked a question 2 times in the chat [01:56] 19:32 < gnomefreak+> sorry cant get into bt atm as you can see above to show logs [01:56] 19:32 < eagles0513875 > unless someone hacked my comp [01:57] script is working :) [01:57] i think problem with LP is causing it to be so damn slow [02:00] sure launchpad creeps day in day out === AlexLatchford [n=alex@82-44-193-109.cable.ubr07.haye.blueyonder.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [02:05] hehe [02:05] finally made it over to Feisty [02:05] darn the new Network manager is good [02:10] asac: script worked like acharm :) [02:10] AlexLatchford: look at your menus in gnome :) [02:10] meh? [02:10] the Control Centre? [02:10] yep [02:10] yeah I know its annoying.. [02:11] but oh well [02:11] very much so === hellcattrav [n=tmoney@ip70-174-174-217.dc.dc.cox.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [04:18] admiral chicago hello? [04:18] hey there [04:19] open up a terminal and try this... firefox --profile-manager [04:19] ok [04:20] admiral_chicago: what am i looking for, FF started and its at my home page(google) [04:21] okay wait a second... [04:22] ok [04:22] hellcattrav: try with a new profile 'firefox -ProfileManager' is the terminal...no quotes [04:25] what do you mean profile? [04:26] i typed firefox --Profile-Manager in the konsole, would you like me to take the - out between profile and manager? [04:26] hellcattrav: firefox -profilemanager [04:28] or -P [04:28] yup [04:29] ok [04:30] i get teh same thing, it goes to homepage [04:30] is it supposed to be somethign different? [04:31] hellcattrav: how did you install fx? [04:32] aptitude install firefox [04:32] okay. [04:32] i used apt-get to install it the first time and then to remove it and the second time i installed it i did it with aptitude [04:34] that's fine. hmm, what command did you run ? [04:38] just now...? i [04:38] or with the firefox -profileManager? [04:39] hellcattrav: yes, what the last command you put in a terminal [04:40] litterly firefox -profilemanager just like that [04:41] firefox -p [04:41] huh? [04:42] actually in a terminal do 'sudo killall firefox-bin && firefox -p' [04:42] no quotes [04:44] ok [04:44] what does this do? [04:45] make sure profile manager comes up, we want to make sure that its not your profile causing allthi [04:45] oh [04:45] whats the &&? [04:45] links commands [04:45] ok, now what [04:46] Admiral_Chicago: good call [04:47] ok i see firefox choose user profile [04:47] what am i looking for? [04:47] oh it also gave me some sort of error [04:48] Error: BadDevice, invalid or uninitialized input device 166 [04:48] Major opcode: 144 [04:48] Minor opcode: 3 [04:48] Resource id: 0x0 [04:48] Failed to open device [04:48] X Error: BadDevice, invalid or uninitialized input device 166 [04:48] Major opcode: 144 [04:48] Minor opcode: 3 [04:48] Resource id: 0x0 [04:48] Failed to open device [04:51] hello? [04:53] hello> [04:53] is someone there? === asac_ [n=asac@debian/developer/asac] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [11:22] hello [11:22] that looks like he is on kde with those errors [11:23] ther eis a work around for it. its not a ff issue its kde issue [11:23] hi ... what are you doing here? [11:23] hello asac [11:23] what time is it? [11:23] sleep working :) [11:23] its 5:23am [11:23] oh man ... you should probably smoke some pot or something ;) [11:23] your really gonna love what i got for you today ;) [11:24] Done downloading [11:24] --- stack trace --- [11:24] --- thread stack trace --- [11:24] oh ... thats not much [11:24] donedoh [11:24] its a 64bit :( [11:25] you want it? [11:25] can you assign? [11:25] yep ;) [11:25] its all yours [11:27] damn [11:28] 693 bugs [11:28] total [11:28] open [11:28] most of those should be ready to be summarized. i will go through the unconfirmed bugs and get them started [11:29] ok ... for now there are just two bugs assigned with retrace for me [11:29] looks like i could handle them :) [11:30] you already tried to summarize? [11:30] i can find more for ya [11:30] no not yet was working on retracing lastnight [11:30] what the script helpful? [11:30] could you just run and go away? [11:31] yep :) [11:31] fine [11:32] bug 87942 [11:32] Malone bug 87942 in firefox "[apport] firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV in raise()" [High,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/87942 [11:32] ah ok [11:32] thats yours [11:32] thought it was another number [11:36] bug 86414 ... is mine too? [11:36] Malone bug 86414 in firefox "[apport] firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV in raise()" [High,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/86414 [11:36] probably yes [11:36] taking [11:39] asac: you want them something like bug 87956? [11:39] Malone bug 87956 in firefox "firefox crashed several times unexpectidly [@gtk_style_realize] " [Undecided,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/87956 [11:45] something like? [11:45] you mean how summary is written? [11:46] usually just [11:46] firefox crash [@...] [11:46] should be enough [11:46] s/several times unexpectidly// [11:53] ok [12:00] what do we do if out of 3 reports on one bug only one is gtk_style? [12:05] the rest? [12:05] depends [12:06] if other reports show up something else, we will forget about gtk_style report .. .because we have others for that [12:06] k [12:11] if we have three different stacktraces in one bug [12:11] we should open new bugs for each stack [12:12] and declare the original bug to be owned by some random stack [12:12] and rememberr to subscribe the report reporter to the new bug [12:13] ok that sounds reasonalbe [12:31] for new reports as stated above. Do you want stacktrace and orig. crash log? [12:58] stacktrace should be enough ... but only if its nearly zero work to copy it out of log [01:03] im adding link tot he comment to orig. crash report === gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === Admiral_Chicago [n=Freddy@ubuntu/member/admiral-chicago] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === poningru [n=poningru@adsl-074-245-140-197.sip.gnv.bellsouth.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === joejaxx [i=joejaxx@ubuntu/member/joejaxx] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === asac [n=asac@debian/developer/asac] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [01:08] hmm [01:09] apparenlty i was offline === gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [01:33] gnomefreak: have you been offline too? [01:33] netsplit [01:33] i than restarted irssi by mistake [01:34] bug 86002 <<< asac [01:34] Malone bug 86002 in firefox "[apport] firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall()" [High,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/86002 [01:35] ah [01:37] yeah ... we already had that one [01:37] didn't we? [01:37] exact same site in backtrace [01:37] not sure ive seen it a few times [01:38] http://www.rockradioaz.cz/azlive.php?choice=0 [01:38] we have tested it yesterday [01:38] or did we talk aabout the same bug [01:38] ? [01:38] same guy too iirc [01:39] we did that was the one i got the popup dialog to accept to play the stream [01:39] but i never crashed on it [01:40] I think we need to use mt-needsummary as a single tag. right now we add it to tags mt-needreport/mt-needretrace. cause going through these alot dont have reports attached [01:41] use [01:41] firefox crash in java [@JavaPluginFactory5::CreateSecureEnv] [@ProxyJNIEnv] [01:42] ok ... makes sense [01:42] k [01:42] will stop adding double tags then :) [01:42] me too [01:59] am i still here? [02:00] thats weird :( [02:02] gnomefreak: no [02:07] mozilla folks are sometimes ... aehm ... weird :) [02:07] push a follow-up advisory sunday night ... after release: http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/ [02:12] ajmitch: freenode pinged me again so i was wondering if i lost connection [02:14] asac: well than 2.0.0.2 im guessing is #1 piority for you than :) [02:14] thats not a good announcment IMHO [02:15] well good they see it and announce it [02:19] yeah ... have to find CVE id for that new announcement before i can release [02:20] otherwise our automatic security check will not be able to verify that this issue is fixed for us [02:22] ah === gnomefreak out for a bit. === joejaxx [i=joejaxx@ubuntu/member/joejaxx] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === poningru [n=poningru@adsl-074-245-140-197.sip.gnv.bellsouth.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === Admiral_Chicago [n=Freddy@ubuntu/member/admiral-chicago] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === ajmitch [n=ajmitch@ubuntu/member/ajmitch] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === Ubugtu [n=bugbot@ubuntu/bot/ubugtu] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === asac [n=asac@debian/developer/asac] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === rhelmer [n=rhelmer@people.mozilla.com] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === \sh_away [n=nnnnnnnn@server3.servereyes.de] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === crimsun [n=crimsun@pdpc/supporter/silver/crimsun] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [02:52] hmm splitting all away [04:07] what is package name of proprietary flash player? [04:16] flashplugin-nonfree [04:16] or do you mean stand alone? [04:16] no [04:16] i cannot find it [04:16] what repo? [04:16] swflash i believe is the stand alone flash player and flashplugin-nonfree is plugin in mulitverse [04:16] multiverse [04:17] asac: you wont have it on 64bit [04:17] just like i wont have 64bit packages in my repos :( [04:17] hehe [04:17] right :) [04:17] second time i ran into this trap [04:17] :) [04:18] so no flash player tests for me :( [04:18] but java6? === pradeep [n=pradeep@59.92.86.243] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [04:19] not in edgy :( [04:19] nope just feisty [04:19] unles syou install it from feisty or java :( [04:19] what package is it? [04:21] can i unsubscribe from ubuntu-bugs when in QA team? [04:23] not sure [04:23] in feisty its sun-java6-jre or plugin or bin [04:23] sun-java6-plugin installs all of the above [04:23] Hello, can someone please confirm bug 64844 ? [04:23] Malone bug 64844 in firefox "Firefox starts very slowly" [Low,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/64844 [04:24] no [04:24] :) [04:25] What more info does that need? [04:25] not exactly info, but a tester who can show up and help to test here throughout the process of tackling this :) [04:25] so if you volunteer, we can confirm it :) [04:26] ok so if there are no volunteers, it will remain open? [04:26] maybe you could profile both applications and post the statistics, so we can see where the time is used? [04:27] not exactly ... if i (or some other team member) comes around and can reproduce this, then i will confirm [04:27] but that might take a little longer [04:28] could that be pango? [04:28] performance? [04:29] as weve found out in dapper that pango caused ff to run slower than official build [04:29] lots of options ... pango might be one, but we load more .so files at startup, which upstream links in statically [04:29] true [04:29] another option is, that we use flat chrome layout while upstream uses jarred up chrome [04:29] testcase == strart disabling options till you find it :) [04:30] we would have to test all options to see [04:30] start* [04:30] no [04:30] you can disable pango by [04:30] export MOZ_DISABLE_PANGO=1 [04:30] pradeep: does this improve startup for you? [04:31] sec [04:31] pradeep: do: [04:31] export MOZ_DISABLE_PANGO=1 [04:31] firefox [04:31] in the console [04:31] pradeep: how to you measure the startup time? [04:31] asac: you opinion on bug 44016 when you get time (going for smoke) [04:31] Malone bug 44016 in firefox "grep: /var/lib/locales/supported.d/*[^~] : No such file or directory" [Undecided,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/44016 [04:33] gnomefreak: is mt-needtestcase [04:33] updated comment [04:35] pradeep: if you have tested this, does the time diff decrease if you compare second run results? [04:40] ok taking break from mt-summary and doing a few retraces :) [04:42] asac, it's fluctuating...sometimes it's low sometimes high: 2.80s-3.20s range [04:42] k [04:42] how about pango ... any improvement? [04:43] that's what I said, it varies between tests [04:43] ok ... 2.8-3.2s absolute time or time diff? [04:43] is this default home page or is this a user set homepage? === gnomefreak wopnders if reporter has set different home pages. (would test both with default mozilla page to get diff in times) [04:45] pradeep: is homepage different for mozilla.org and ubuntu install? [04:45] asac, 'user' time [04:45] default ubuntu [04:45] ubuntu.com might be slower to render than mozillas default [04:45] can you try to set both homepages to the same page [04:46] isn't the default one a local file? [04:46] e.g. set some custom homepage for you profile [04:46] ? [04:46] what is mozilla.org default one? [04:46] file:///usr/share/ubuntu-artwork/home/index.html [04:46] mozilla.com for the vanilla one [04:50] pradeep: so ... *vanilla* is user time: '2.176s'; *disabled pango* is '3s'; *all default* is '4.8s' ? [04:50] can you still reproduce these values? [04:51] asac, it's a higher value with a home page set [04:52] 3.76s (pango enabled), 3.31s (disabled) === asac still wonders how you stop the timer in a reproducible fashion [04:53] anyway, if you are subscribed to the bug and you stay available for further tests, we can move this to confirmed [04:56] done [04:56]