/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2007/02/26/#ubuntu-x.txt

UbugtuNew bug: #87888 in xorg (main) "Correct resolution detected, but impossible to use" [Undecided,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/8788802:41
UbugtuNew bug: #46697 in xserver-xorg-video-mga (main) "I could not test out LiveCD at all" [Medium,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/4669703:25
=== mvo [n=egon@p54A660A0.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-x
=== seb128 [n=seb128@ubuntu/member/seb128] has joined #ubuntu-x
seb128tepsipakki: hi09:27
tepsipakkiso, what patch have you found?09:28
seb128tepsipakki: 42_build_int10_submodules.diff that you didn't apply for 'causes "some regression"' reason breaks the int10 module (undefined symbol and doesn't load)09:28
tepsipakkioh yes09:28
seb128what was the regression you found with it?09:28
tepsipakkithere was some discussion on debian-x I think09:28
tepsipakkilet me check09:28
seb128they do apply it09:29
seb128ok09:29
tepsipakkicould be that I just misunderstood something09:30
=== Treenaks [n=martijn@thuis.foodfight.org] has joined #ubuntu-x
seb128"dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/modules//libint10.so: undefined symbol: Int10Current"09:31
seb128that's the error without the patch09:31
tepsipakkiok, so apply it09:33
tepsipakkican't find any regression-talk about it :/09:34
seb128k09:34
seb128have you seen the changes I made for xorg before upload?09:35
UbugtuNew bug: #87973 in xserver-xorg-video-s3 (main) "Broken legacy S3 xorg driver in feisty (Fix included)" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/8797309:35
tepsipakkiah that09:38
tepsipakkiwhatever works ;)09:40
seb128yeah09:40
seb128ok, back to the server09:40
seb128update on http://people.ubuntu.com/~seb128/xorg-server/ for the source package, I'll upload deb soon for people who want to try it09:41
tepsipakkiupload to the archive?09:42
seb128no, on the same people place09:42
seb128I'll upload to the archive only when I'm confident it doesn't break for half of the world :p09:43
tepsipakkiyep, sure09:43
tepsipakkiI might try the EXA-thing on my radeon09:43
seb128that's not a blocker I think09:45
seb128I just had EXA enabled and I though the server was broken with radeon cards maybe09:46
seb128which it was not, it works fine without EXA09:46
tepsipakkiso i810 doesn't work right?09:46
tepsipakkiwe could put a new driver release for that, and see if they work together09:46
seb128for dholbach09:47
seb128yeah, would be nice09:47
seb128the EXA problem might be https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1007009:47
UbugtuFreedesktop bug 10070 in Acceleration/XAA "EXA & XAA RGB core line text performance regression" [Normal,New]  09:47
Treenaks'core line text performance'.. is that the 'gnome-terminal is slow' thing?09:48
seb128no, the gnome-terminal is slow is likely to be vte because people said than drowngrading to the edgy version fixes it09:50
seb128that would be nice to have somebody getting to problem looking at it09:51
seb128because it's not slow on my box or not enough to be annoying09:51
Treenaksseb128: I only have it on fglrx.. not my nvidia-box at work09:52
seb128I use the ati driver, not evil binary one :p09:52
Treenaks(also, it's the X server eating 100%, not vte/gnome-term)09:52
seb128not a lot we can do on fglrx09:52
Treenaksseb128: I would, if someone would fix bug 20283 :P09:52
UbugtuMalone bug 20283 in xserver-xorg-video-ati "[fgl v5000]  really bad sync" [Medium,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/2028309:52
Treenaks(but it probably depends on a rewrite of the ATOM bios parser, which is planned for Radeon/Randr1.2 work anyway)09:54
tepsipakkifglrx doesn't support xorg7.2 yet09:54
Treenakstepsipakki: no, but radeon is badly broken on my hardware (see that bug)09:55
tepsipakkiyep, saw that09:55
seb128tepsipakki: http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/rpms/xorg-x11-server/devel/xorg-x11-server-1.2.0-enable-composite.patch?rev=1.1&view=markup10:34
seb128what do you think about that?10:34
seb128do you know why that's not the default upstream?10:34
seb128tepsipakki: the previous Ubuntu package had a 019_ubuntu_enable_composite.diff10:40
seb128tepsipakki: any reason you dropped it?10:41
=== mvo_ [n=egon@p54A660A0.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-x
tepsipakkiseb128: no.. must be a mistake :/10:53
seb128tepsipakki: you dropped a lot of useful patch10:55
seb128I've undropped 4 of them10:55
seb128and I'm looking at others now10:55
tepsipakkimaybe they were lost during rename&re-merge10:57
seb128tepsipakki: dunno, 7 patches dropped by mistake already though10:58
tepsipakkiarf10:59
seb128not really fun :/10:59
tepsipakkino, and it took this long to find out :I10:59
tepsipakkibut.. without COMPOSITE I shouldn't be able to run compiz?11:00
seb128$ compiz --replace gconf11:00
seb128/usr/bin/compiz.real: No composite extension11:00
tepsipakkiok, so they were lost between -2ubuntu1/-3ubuntu111:05
tepsipakkidamnit11:05
seb128hum, in fact there might be some patches not required11:06
seb128the composite one is required though11:06
tepsipakkiyes11:06
seb128hum11:06
seb128tepsipakki: ok, I got pretty confused by your renaming11:19
tepsipakkioh!11:19
tepsipakki? rather11:20
seb128it made harder to compare the list of patches11:20
seb128well, I looked at the patches from previous packages and they were not there to the new package11:20
seb128like 38_Fix-pDRIPriv_NULL_deref.patch11:21
seb128it was not obvious that 124_fix-pdripriv_null_deref.patch was the same one11:21
tepsipakkihmm, ok11:21
seb128well, by readin the name it makes sense, from a quick look to the patches lsit no11:21
tepsipakkitrue11:21
seb128the only changes I made over your packages for the moment are to enable the 42_build_int10_submodules.diff11:22
seb128and undrop the enable composite one11:22
tepsipakkiI'll check the others11:22
tepsipakkifor validity11:22
seb128thank you11:22
tepsipakkino, thank you ;)11:22
seb128I think we should be mostly good one we have composite again11:22
seb128s/one/once11:22
tepsipakkiyep11:23
=== seb128 [n=seb128@ubuntu/member/seb128] has joined #ubuntu-x
tepsipakkiseb128: patches 005, 011, 012 are applied upstream12:11
tepsipakki009 is at least partly upstream, and not anymore in fedoras package12:11
seb128k12:12
tepsipakki013 doesn't seem to be necessary anymore (and doesn't apply as-is)12:12
tepsipakki015, 016, 017 upstream12:23
seb128I think that the update is ready for upload12:27
seb128we got some people who tested it12:27
seb128Debian has the package as well and not world breakage12:27
tepsipakki018 the same as with 013, not needed anymore12:30
tepsipakkiseb128: ok, rock12:30
tepsipakkiso, 019 was the only dropped patch by mistake, phew12:30
seb128would have made the bling addicts not happy ;)12:33
seb128I'll try the server on my laptop (i810) and upload after lunch if nobody has an objection12:33
tepsipakkiactually there was someone on the meta-bug who commented that compiz didn't work anymore..12:33
tepsipakkibut that didn't wake me up12:34
=== seb128 [n=seb128@ubuntu/member/seb128] has joined #ubuntu-x
=== mvo_ [n=egon@p54A660A0.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-x
=== cjwatson [n=cjwatson@82-69-40-219.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-x
=== cjwatson_ [n=cjwatson@82-69-40-219.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-x
tepsipakkiseb128: I wonder if we should take some patches from fedora (which are fixes from upstream)01:58
seb128I've looked at them01:59
seb128I want to get xorg-server uploaded today01:59
seb128I'll do bug fixing, and you are welcome to participate, then01:59
tepsipakkiyep, those can be added later02:00
seb128would be nice to look at drivers updates now02:00
seb128do you know if debian-x is working on those?02:00
seb128maybe we can start with simple ones (not i810, ati or nvidia)02:00
tepsipakkiyes02:01
tepsipakkiI mean, yes we can start with those :)02:01
tepsipakkiexperimental hasn't had an upload against 7.2 yet02:02
seb128do you know where are upstream tarballs for those?02:02
tepsipakkihttp://ftp.x.org/pub/individual/driver/02:03
tepsipakkifor instance02:03
seb128there is no drivers update for 7.2 then?02:04
seb128only i810, vmware and wsfb have tarballs from 2007 02:04
tepsipakkithat's right02:05
seb128ok, so once the server is uploaded we are basically done with xorg 7.2 update? ;)02:05
tepsipakkiwell, maybe the input-drivers?02:06
tepsipakkisorry02:06
tepsipakkino updates there either..02:06
tepsipakkineed to look more closely..02:06
tepsipakkithere are some updates, like -input-mouse and -keyboard02:10
tepsipakkialso some of the drivers have minor updates since our current versions02:10
seb128ok, let's look at those then02:11
seb128there is a xserver-xorg-input-mouse 1.2.1 upstream and fedora has it for some time02:13
seb128we have 1.1.102:13
seb128do you have any idea of why Debian didn't update it?02:14
seb128there is an 1.1.2 also02:14
tepsipakkino idea..02:14
tepsipakkijcristau: ping?02:15
seb128tepsipakki: I'm looking at the input mouse update02:20
tepsipakkiseb128: ok, I'll take a look at evdev02:21
seb128cool02:21
seb128xserver-xorg-input-mouse has almost no change02:25
tepsipakki1.1.1 vs 1.1.2 or 1.2.0?02:25
seb1281.1.1 against 1.2.102:26
seb128diffstat has 30 lines of code changes02:26
tepsipakkipretty mild :P02:26
seb128http://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/7638/02:27
seb128do you know when the ABI_XINPUT_VERSION changed?02:27
seb128hw/xfree86/common/xf86Module.h:#define ABI_XINPUT_VERSION       SET_ABI_VERSION(0, 7)02:28
tepsipakkino I don't ..02:28
tepsipakkiso it hasn't changed yet?02:32
seb128doesn't really mater, the source do an else if for that02:40
=== mvo [n=egon@p54A660A0.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-x
=== seb128 [n=seb128@ubuntu/member/seb128] has joined #ubuntu-x
=== Ubugtu [n=bugbot@ubuntu/bot/ubugtu] has joined #ubuntu-x
=== jcristau [n=jcristau@pdpc/supporter/basic/jcristau] has joined #ubuntu-x
=== crimsun [n=crimsun@pdpc/supporter/silver/crimsun] has joined #ubuntu-x
=== tepsipakki [n=tjaalton@replicant.hut.fi] has joined #ubuntu-x
=== Treenaks [n=martijn@thuis.foodfight.org] has joined #ubuntu-x
UbugtuNew bug: #87954 in xorg (main) "Edgy glxgears error - libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x4b" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/8795403:00
tepsipakkiwhat a lovely bugreport03:05
tepsipakkitons of output and of course not in attachments03:06
tepsipakkibesides a bogus one03:06
tepsipakki+being03:06
=== mvo_ [n=egon@p54A64F69.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-x
seb128tepsipakki: ok, BTW, do you know why the package doesn't ship utils like 03:28
seb128dh_install: debian/tmp/usr/bin/pcitweak exists in debian/tmp but is not installed to anywhere03:28
seb128dh_install: debian/tmp/usr/bin/scanpci exists in debian/tmp but is not installed to anywhere03:28
seb128dh_install: debian/tmp/usr/bin/xorgconfig exists in debian/tmp but is not installed to anywhere03:28
seb128it used to ship scanpci03:28
tepsipakkixorg-server?03:28
seb128tepsipakki: yep03:29
seb128tepsipakki: http://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/7643/03:30
seb128most are probably not useful, scanpci could be though, no?03:30
tepsipakkimaybe so03:30
tepsipakki  * Ship again ioport, gtf, pcitweak and scanpci.03:30
tepsipakki -- Fabio M. Di Nitto <fabbione@ubuntu.com>  Tue, 04 Apr 2006 16:33:00 +020003:31
seb128ah03:31
seb128I'll modify the package to ship them then03:31
tepsipakkimaybe that has been dropped some time03:31
tepsipakkiby accident or so03:31
seb128well, dropped by your merge03:31
tepsipakkireally?03:31
tepsipakkihrm03:31
seb128$ debdiff /var/cache/apt/archives/xserver-xorg-core_1%3a1.1.1-0ubuntu14_i386.deb xserver-xorg-core_1.2.0-3ubuntu1_i386.deb03:32
seb128...03:32
seb128Files in first .deb but not in second03:32
seb128-------------------------------------03:32
seb128...03:32
seb128-rwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/bin/gtf03:32
seb128-rwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/bin/ioport03:32
seb128-rwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/bin/pcitweak03:32
seb128-rwxr-xr-x  root/root   /usr/bin/scanpci03:32
tepsipakkiright..03:34
tepsipakkisigh, I'll make another check for xorg-server and see if there is anything else missing03:47
tepsipakkieh, 381000 lines in the debdiff03:48
tepsipakkiok maybe I'll just filter anything _not_ in debian/ :I03:52
seb128tepsipakki: don't bother, I think we are fine now03:53
seb128you checked the patches already03:53
seb128and a debdiff and dh_install --list-missing caught those03:53
seb128I'll upload rsn03:53
tepsipakkiok, thanks03:53
tepsipakkino word from Mithrandir yet, though?04:12
seb128no04:14
seb128I'll upload anyway if he doesn't reply04:14
seb128the new build is done04:14
seb128rebooting, if that works I'll upload04:14
=== seb128 [n=seb128@ubuntu/member/seb128] has joined #ubuntu-x
seb128hum04:26
seb128the server upgrade broke xorg on my laptop04:26
tepsipakkioh..04:27
seb128/usr/share/X11/fonts was existing and a real directoru04:27
seb128directory04:27
seb128from january 200604:27
tepsipakkiah04:28
tepsipakkiwhat package made it?04:28
seb128I might have changed things by hand for an xorg problem or something04:28
tepsipakkiok :)04:28
seb128none, there was nothing own by a package there04:28
seb128only font caches and the dir04:28
seb128but since the new server doesn't look to /usr/share/fonts/X1104:28
seb128it was failing on the "doesn't find fixed font" problem04:29
seb128anyway nobody else complained about that04:29
tepsipakkithere should be a symlink made by xorg04:29
tepsipakki-update04:29
seb128the symlink didn't work because there was a real dir04:29
tepsipakkitrue04:29
seb128I'll upload anyway, I might have changed things by hand04:29
seb128and if that's not the case we can track it04:29
tepsipakkithough it's silly that the server doesn't look there by default04:30
seb128it worked for the other people who tried04:30
seb128maybe we should patch it for that?04:30
tepsipakkiyes maybe04:30
seb128anyway going to upload the server now if nobody is against it, we need to get that done04:30
tepsipakkigo ahead04:31
tepsipakkihah, --with-default-font-path doesn't have the path for fixed04:34
tepsipakkirest is there04:35
tepsipakkimaybe there's a reason, dunno04:35
tepsipakkiactually, we used to have --with-fontdir=/usr/share/fonts/X1104:36
tepsipakkiand Debian changed that some time ago04:36
=== mvo__ [n=egon@p54A64F69.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-x
seb128tepsipakki: what do you think about http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/rpms/xorg-x11-server/devel/xorg-x11-server-1.1.1-builtin-fonts.patch?rev=1.1&view=log ?05:22
UbugtuNew bug: #22373 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.15 (restricted) "cant run fgl_glxgears" [Medium,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/2237305:25
tepsipakki--enable-kdrive is set, and so should KDRIVESERVER be as well05:28
tepsipakkibut maybe I'm missing something05:29
tepsipakkiah, maybe it is set for kdrive and _only_ kdrive05:30
tepsipakkiso using that patch uses the fallback for all servers05:31
seb128I'll try if that fixes the "xorg doesn't start when the symlink is not made" problem05:31
tepsipakkicool05:32
tepsipakkiseems that fedora has used it for quite a while05:32
seb128and then I'll upload05:32
=== mvo [n=egon@F8296.f.strato-dslnet.de] has joined #ubuntu-x
=== seb128 [n=seb128@ubuntu/member/seb128] has joined #ubuntu-x
=== seb128 [n=seb128@ubuntu/member/seb128] has joined #ubuntu-x
tepsipakkiok, I'm going to sauna now.. maybe that'll beat this frigging flu as well :P05:56
tepsipakkiI'll come back later ->05:56
seb128tepsipakki: doesn't fix the login without the correct font directory, I'm uploading without that05:57
=== mvo_ [n=egon@F8296.f.strato-dslnet.de] has joined #ubuntu-x
tepsipakkiseb128: ok06:38
seb128tepsipakki: I uploaded like half an hour ago but not sign of the upload, I probably screwed something, dunno what I didn't get mail yet06:38
tepsipakkiheh06:42
=== seb128 [n=seb128@ubuntu/member/seb128] has joined #ubuntu-x
tepsipakkiseb128: fedora has "--with-default-font-path="unix/:7100,built-ins", so maybe that's why the patch (alone) didn't work 07:15
seb128ah, probably07:15
seb128xorg-server upload accepted BTW07:16
tepsipakkiwhee07:16
seb128the first one was rejected because the email was not correct07:16
seb128"Ubuntu Core Developers <ubuntu-devel-discuss at lists.ubuntu.com>: no @ found in email address part."07:17
tepsipakkiah, that again :/07:17
tepsipakkihad the same problem with xorg07:17
tepsipakkithere were some xgettext problems because of that :)07:18
tepsipakkiI copied those from some feisty-changes post, so no wonder it didn't work07:19
seb128it's fixed anyway07:19
seb128I'm away for ~2 hours07:19
seb128time for the server to build and be available07:19
tepsipakkiyeah07:19
tepsipakkithanks07:19
seb128I'll look at bugs and breakages reported then07:19
tepsipakkiI'll monitor them as well07:19
seb128bbl07:19
seb128cool, thank you07:20
jcristautepsipakki: pong08:30
jcristau(just got back from brussels)08:31
tepsipakkihi.. I've already forgot what it was :)08:31
tepsipakkibut when I remember, I'll ping you again :)08:32
jcristauok :)08:32
tepsipakkioh yes, the 42_build_int10_submodules.diff.. IIRC you said once that it causes some regression, but I can't find anything related on debian-x list08:33
UbugtuNew bug: #88093 in xorg (main) "strange colors all over the screen" [Undecided,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/8809309:02
jcristautepsipakki: #41087909:07
seb128jcristau: hi09:08
jcristauhi seb128 09:08
seb128jcristau: without it the int10 module can't be used (missing symbol)09:08
jcristauseb128: did you autoreconf?09:08
seb128no, just the package update made by tepsipakki dropped the patch09:08
seb128I made the package use it again09:09
seb128jcristau: and any opinion on http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/rpms/xorg-x11-server/devel/xorg-x11-server-1.1.1-builtin-fonts.patch?rev=1.1&view=markup ? 09:10
jcristaunot really09:11
seb128the font path changes and if for whatever reason the new path is not made available xorg doesn't start, would be nice to get it robust to that problem09:12
jcristaufair enough09:12
seb128did Debian change from /usr/share/fonts/X11 to /usr/share/X11/fonts also or is that Ubuntu specific?09:13
tepsipakkiseb128: other way around09:13
seb128tepsipakki: hum09:13
tepsipakki /usr/share/fonts/X11 is what we use now ;)09:14
seb128why do we need the /usr/share/X11/fonts symlink then?09:14
jcristaudebian sarge has /usr/lib/X11/fonts, or /usr/X11R6/lib/something, IIRC09:14
jcristauso we never released with /usr/share/X11/fonts09:15
tepsipakkiseb128: the old configs have that09:15
seb128ah right, for configs not update09:15
seb128updated09:15
seb128makes sense yep09:15
tepsipakkibut I guess adding fixed to "--with-default-font-path" would solve this as well09:16
tepsipakkijcristau: do you know why debian changed --with-fontdir to --with-default-font-path ?09:16
jcristauno09:17
tepsipakkifedora uses both \o/09:17
tepsipakkiumm09:22
tepsipakki--with-default-font-path="/usr/share/fonts/X11/misc,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fon09:23
tepsipakkits/misc,/usr/share/fonts/X11/cyrillic,/usr/share/fonts/X11/100dpi/:unscaled,/usr/share/font09:23
tepsipakkis/X11/75dpi/:unscaled,/usr/share/fonts/X11/Type1,/usr/X11R6/lib/  X11/fonts/Type1,09:23
tepsipakkidamn09:23
tepsipakkithe point was that there is whitespace between "/usr/X11R6/lib/" and "X11/fonts/Type1"09:24
tepsipakkiwonder why09:24
UbugtuNew bug: #51775 in xserver-xorg-input-mouse (main) "Logitech usb mouse random freezes" [Undecided,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/5177511:20

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!