=== doko_ [n=doko@dslb-088-073-122-003.pools.arcor-ip.net]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== BenC [n=bcollins@debian/developer/bcollins]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== holycow [n=hello@mail.wjsgroup.com]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== TommyBJ [n=JensenTB@mopo.frinorge.no]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== bernard_ [n=bernard@mersenne.largestprime.net]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== thom [n=thom@amnesiac.heapspace.net]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== smurf [n=smurf@debian/developer/smurf]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== BenC [n=bcollins@debian/developer/bcollins]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== lfittl [n=lfittl@213.129.230.12]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== philwyett [n=philwyet@bb-87-81-146-45.ukonline.co.uk]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== kkubasik [n=kjk38@kjk38-laptop.STUDENT.CWRU.Edu]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== johanbr_ [n=j@blk-137-114-65.eastlink.ca]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== johanbr [n=j@blk-137-114-65.eastlink.ca]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== kkubasik [n=kjk38@kjk38-laptop.STUDENT.CWRU.Edu]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== rikai [n=rikai@unaffiliated/rikai]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== Lure [n=lure@external-7.hermes.si]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== Starting logfile irclogs/ubuntu-kernel.log
=== ubuntulog [i=ubuntulo@ubuntu/bot/ubuntulog]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== Topic for #ubuntu-kernel: Ubuntu kernel development discussion ONLY | Kernel Wiki: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam | 2.6.20-9.15 Uploaded - Things are getting solid now. Use it, but there are still a few missing modules. | BUG STATUS (2.6.20): 281 Open, 70 Unconfirmed, 165 Unassigned
=== Topic (#ubuntu-kernel): set by BenC at Mon Feb 26 16:28:31 2007
=== cassidy [n=cassidy@host-213-189-171-21.brutele.be]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== cjwatson [n=cjwatson@82-69-40-219.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== Keybuk [n=scott@quest.netsplit.com]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== rikai_ [n=rikai@unaffiliated/rikai]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== ivoks [n=ivoks@backup.grad.hr]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== varkatope [n=varkatop@p54A5E7B7.dip.t-dialin.net]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
[12:12] <Mithrandir> BenC: ps3-kboot> uh, another copy of the linux kernel in the archive?
[12:13] <varkatope> can i ask for a specific kernel driver module availability in feisty here?
[12:16] <cjwatson> Mithrandir: it's necessary unfortunately - kboot doesn't work with 2.6.20 yet
[12:16] <cjwatson> Ben tried fairly hard to make that work
[12:16] <Mithrandir> cjwatson: hm, but it doesn't seem to actually build the kernel at any point?
[12:17] <Mithrandir> sorry, it does.
[12:17] <Mithrandir> I guess he'll want this in main too?
[12:19] <cjwatson> yeah, it's needed for PS3s
[12:19] <cjwatson> I think Ben's still working on making it work with 2.6.20
[12:19] <Mithrandir> ok.
[12:20] <Mithrandir> I'm not happy with it, but I see the point of it not working with 2.6.20 yet.  I wonder if having a policy that such packages should build-depend on the current linux-source and then ship the patches to go down to the version they want, then building with that would make sense or just be utterly insane.
[12:21] <cjwatson> I think the patch might well be about as big as the kernel, so I don't see the point in this kind of case
[12:22] <cjwatson> the only result of that would be that it would be a lot less comprehensible
[12:22] <Mithrandir> extra incentive to get stuff working for the latest kernel because of the pain involved. :-)
[12:22] <cjwatson> I understand the incentive, but I think the method is misplaced
[12:25] <varkatope> where to ask/look if a specific chipset is supported by the kernel of feisty fawn?
[12:27] <cjwatson> varkatope: look> apt-get source linux-source-2.6.20, debian/config/wherever; ask> bug report on linux-source-2.6.20
[12:28] <varkatope> cjwatson: thx
=== pkl_ [n=phillip@lougher.demon.co.uk]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== gilligan_ [n=gilligan@p549AB364.dip0.t-ipconnect.de]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
[01:34] <gilligan_> hi
=== zul [n=chuck@ubuntu/member/zul]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== ivoks [n=ivoks@backup.grad.hr]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== tuxmaniac [n=aanjhan@unaffiliated/tuxmaniac]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
[01:48] <doko> bug 89851
[01:48] <doko> <fabbione> doko: the heartbeat problem might be a missing kernel header..
[01:48] <doko> <fabbione> ia64: checking for linux/icmpv6.h... no
[01:48] <doko> <fabbione> i386: checking for linux/icmpv6.h... yes
[01:48] <doko> <fabbione> doko: ^^ this one is the problem for sure.. you can see in the i386 build log that it then builds IPv6addr
[01:49] <fabbione> doko: i said probably.. you need to check the header packages
=== sdrik [n=sdrik@ip-93-4.dsl.newel.net]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
[01:49] <doko> on the list, but low prio
[01:54] <gilligan_> http://gilligan.neuecouch.de/nl_socket.txt <-- could someone do me a favor and check if he can see what the problem with this simple netlink socket test is ?
[01:55] <gilligan_> I don't get it
=== zul [n=chuck@CPE0006258ec6c1-CM000a73655d0e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
[02:22] <BenC> Mithrandir: has to be a certain version. The 2.6.20 can't kexec kernels
=== abogani [n=abogani@adsl203-157-083.mclink.it]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== jamesh [n=james@203-59-195-215.dyn.iinet.net.au]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== BenC_ [n=bcollins@12.145.6.2]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
[02:49] <zul> besides sometimes its not trivial to go one from one version to the next.
[03:05] <zul> there is a meeting today isnt there?
[03:07] <gilligan_> hm.. still looking for some help on a netlink problem.. anyone?
=== BenC [n=bcollins@12.145.6.2]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== BenC [n=bcollins@debian/developer/bcollins]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== rtg [n=rtg@12.145.6.117]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
[03:22] <zul> hah...http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2007-03/msg00166.html
[03:22] <zul> 13 year olds..
=== kkubasik [n=kjk38@kjk38-laptop.STUDENT.CWRU.Edu]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
[03:33] <Keybuk> zul: why does Xen need such an old kernel version?
[03:33] <mjg59> Because Xen isn't in the main kernel tree?
[03:34] <zul> Keybuk: Xensource doesnt even track the latest kernels and the one we have is from redhat
[03:34] <Keybuk> right, I just mean has there been some known difficulty updating it to 2.6.20 or is it just that nobody's tried yet
=== BenC_ [n=bcollins@12.145.6.2]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== BenC [n=bcollins@debian/developer/bcollins]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
[03:35] <zul> Keybuk: there is some dificulty because of the workqueue changes and the paravirt-ops changes but opensuse only ported to 2.6.20 very recently and its not really tested yet
[03:35] <zul> quintela from redhat is still in the process of porting 3.0.3 to 2.6.20
[03:35] <Keybuk> *nods*
[03:36] <zul> and Im in the process of porting xen-unstable from 2.6.18 to 2.6.21
[03:36] <Keybuk> the reason that check is there is because we had some problems getting the feisty udev to work with older kernels than 2.6.19
[03:36] <Keybuk> that could be fixed now though
[03:36] <zul> cool
[03:36] <Keybuk> I'll investigate and see whether we can't drop that back to a minimum 2.6.17 dep
[03:37] <zul> that would be nice for the xen users who still want to use their compiled kernels as well
[03:37] <Keybuk> I'm not sure how broken feisty would be with an older kernel though
[03:38] <Keybuk> things like apport might not work, and may fail badly
[03:38] <zul> true..Im hoping for feisty to base it off the proper kernel
[03:42] <zul> mjg59: I doubt Xensource is looking for inclusion now
[03:42] <kylem> xensource are <censored by the CoC>
[03:43] <zul> heh...a bunch of <censored by the CoC>? :)
[03:44] <kylem> jeremy has been doing a decent job getting xen-paravirt up to snuff.
[03:44] <kylem> i'd be happy to do a backport in my spare time if you need help.
[03:44] <zul> kylem: sure I was toying around with it this weekend
=== Nafallo [n=nafallo@ubuntu/member/nafallo]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== Lure [n=lure@clj46-234.dial-up.arnes.si]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== ivoks [n=ivoks@34-62.dsl.iskon.hr]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== pmjdebruijn [n=pmjdebru@pmjdebruijn.xs4all.nl]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
[05:58] <zul> *sigh* https://launchpad.net/bugs/89665
[06:01] <gilligan_> wow..what an idiot
=== johanbr [n=j@JBrannlund.MathStat.Dal.Ca]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== ivoks [n=ivoks@34-62.dsl.iskon.hr]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== Starting logfile irclogs/ubuntu-kernel.log
=== ubuntulog [i=ubuntulo@ubuntu/bot/ubuntulog]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== Topic for #ubuntu-kernel: Ubuntu kernel development discussion ONLY | Kernel Wiki: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam | 2.6.20-9.15 Uploaded - Things are getting solid now. Use it, but there are still a few missing modules. | BUG STATUS (2.6.20): 281 Open, 70 Unconfirmed, 165 Unassigned
=== Topic (#ubuntu-kernel): set by BenC at Mon Feb 26 16:28:31 2007
=== Keybuk [n=scott@wing-commander.netsplit.com]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== Keybuk [n=scott@wing-commander.netsplit.com]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== bleinmon1 [n=toffel@ppp85-141-150-71.pppoe.mtu-net.ru]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== bleinmon1 [n=toffel@ppp85-141-150-71.pppoe.mtu-net.ru]  has left #ubuntu-kernel [] 
=== philwyett [n=philwyet@bb-87-81-146-45.ukonline.co.uk]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
=== Kazz [n=kazz@ip68-231-27-66.ph.ph.cox.net]  has joined #ubuntu-kernel
[11:12] <Kazz> Hey, does anyone know if there are problems with LDM (for accessing windows dynamic disks)?  It's part of the kernel, so I hope you don't mind me asking here...it seems to be compiled in, but it doesn't seem to be doing its job.
[11:14] <Kazz> It wasn't working with 2.6.17-10-generic and it's still just showing everything as 1 SFS partition with -11 too when it should be showing the individual partitions inside of the "dynamic disk".