[12:38] <AlexLatchford> dfarning: gammar :P
[12:38] <AlexLatchford> grammar even
[09:21] <AlexLatchford> Anyone else find that renaming a folder in 1.5.0.10 TB produces an error
[09:22] <AlexLatchford> No wait, changing its capitals does..
[09:22] <AlexLatchford> so from 'test' to 'Test' produces an error
[09:47] <asac> hmm
[09:47] <asac> problem with case sensitiveness?
[11:00] <asac> ok fellows ... totem will be fixed soon ... please search through db and mark all bugs that have gtk_style_realize in trace as duplicate of the master filepicker bug ... and merge all current gtk_style_realize bugs as well as theme crash master bug in one bug
[11:00] <asac> as soon as totem is uploaded we will close all these ande then look if any such thing is ever reported again :)
[11:08] <gnomefreak> asac: i got alot of them yesterday if i am ablet o get on line today i will try
[11:08] <asac> good
[11:08] <asac> in fact all gtk_realize belong to the same bug
[11:09] <asac> so ::nsFilePicker ... nsAppShell::Run ... etc.
[11:09] <asac> all are one ;)
[11:09] <asac> and should be gone :)
[11:09] <gnomefreak> they are all one?
[11:09] <asac> yes
[11:09] <gnomefreak> goodie
[11:10] <asac> all crashes will be gone :)
[11:10] <asac> finally some chance to clean things up in bts :)
[11:10] <asac> ok ... i am out for 10 minutes ... got to get narcotics like cigarettes, bread, coffee :)
[11:13] <asac> bug 90333
[11:13] <gnomefreak> as soon as i find out wtf is going on ill be starting my coffee iv
[11:13] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 90333 in totem "totem plugin causes frequent gecko crashes because NPPVpluginKeepLibraryInMemory is broken" [High,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/90333
[11:13] <asac> is the one that works around it
[11:14] <asac> maybe drop a note to the master bugs
[11:14] <asac> that this workaround fixes this for us
[11:14] <asac> i will open a new bug, which will deal with NPPVpluginKeepLibraryInMemory is broken in mozilla
[11:14] <asac> as this is just bad
[11:14] <asac> though totem is the only plugin we have in archive that uses this option
[11:14] <gnomefreak> k
[11:15] <asac> ok got to got and find things above
[11:15] <gnomefreak> someone is saying 1.5.0.10 tb is borked
[11:16] <asac> about what?
[11:16] <gnomefreak> im trying to find out
[11:16] <gnomefreak> heno in -devel is saying it
[11:18] <asac> https://beta.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozilla-thunderbird/+bugs?field.searchtext=&orderby=-datecreated&search=Search&field.status%3Alist=Unconfirmed&field.status%3Alist=Confirmed&field.status%3Alist=In+Progress&field.status%3Alist=Needs+Info&field.status%3Alist=Fix+Committed&field.assignee=&field.owner=&field.omit_dupes=on&field.has_patch=&field.has_no_package=
[11:18] <asac> i don't see new bugs
[11:18] <asac> at least not frequent ones
[11:21] <gnomefreak> bug 90066
[11:21] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 90066 in mozilla-thunderbird "[apport]  mozilla-thunderbird-bin crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall()" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/90066
[11:21] <gnomefreak> it looks like a crash without coredump :(
[11:22] <gnomefreak> but take a look at those if you find them able to be retraced i will try them.
[11:25] <asac> me too
[11:25] <asac> :)
[11:25] <asac> buy narcotics (see above)
[11:36] <asac> gnomefreak: can we retrace tbir?
[11:36] <asac> or are there no -dbgsym packages?
[11:44] <asac> there should be -dbgsym packages ... but do they yield good traces?
[11:51] <asac> reassigne two tbird crashes to gnomefreak ... maybe you can retrace :)
[12:34] <gnomefreak> ill try
[12:34] <gnomefreak> in feisty ther eis
[12:38] <gnomefreak> bug 90066 needs coredump ;)
[12:38] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 90066 in mozilla-thunderbird "[apport]  mozilla-thunderbird-bin crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall()" [High,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/90066
[12:39] <gnomefreak> asac: i only see one report assigned to me. what was the 2nd one?
[12:40] <asac> hmm
[12:40] <asac> bug 90346
[12:40] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 90346 in mozilla-thunderbird "[apport]  mozilla-thunderbird-bin crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall() (dup-of: 90348)" [High,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/90346
[12:40] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 90348 in mozilla-thunderbird "[apport]  mozilla-thunderbird-bin crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall()" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/90348
[12:41] <asac> ah ... he posted a new one and closed the original
[12:41] <asac> maybe the new one already has symbols?
[12:41] <gnomefreak> i got it :)
[12:42] <asac> close bug 90066
[12:42] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 90066 in mozilla-thunderbird "[apport]  mozilla-thunderbird-bin crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall()" [High,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/90066
[12:42] <asac> with "please report new bug if you ever get a new crash report. thank you"
[12:42] <asac> we should really eliminate the mt-needreport imo
[12:43] <gnomefreak> i asked for full report on that one
[12:43] <asac> its just not worth to take care
[12:43] <asac> better close right away and let reporter know how to better report next time
[12:43] <asac> gnomefreak: ok ... you can always do what you like of course :)
[12:43] <asac> https://beta.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozilla-thunderbird/+bug/90348
[12:43] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 90348 in mozilla-thunderbird "[apport]  mozilla-thunderbird-bin crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall()" [High,Needs info] 
[12:43] <gnomefreak> :) i want to try feisty retrace locally to see if i can get a good stack
[12:43] <asac> bad?
[12:44] <asac> heno installed -dbgsym
[12:44] <asac> crazy that such a bad stack came out of it
[12:44] <asac> i would really like to know if thunderbird retraces work at all
[12:44] <asac> maybe -dbgsym pacckages are borked
[12:44] <asac> and i have to do something about this when building package
[12:45] <gnomefreak> well lets see what happens with the retrace first. im not sure the -dbgsym help without retrace.
[12:45] <asac> :)
[12:45] <asac> sure
[12:45] <gnomefreak> brb
[01:00] <gnomefreak> IMHO we need -dbg packages for everything we support and add them as depends of the main package. this way when we get a crash report most of the stack should be good
[01:00] <asac> hmmm probably it won't work ... i am build dbgsym packages for now
[01:00] <asac> hehe
[01:00] <asac> no
[01:00] <asac> definitly not
[01:00] <asac> depends of main package would mean:
[01:00] <gnomefreak> why too big?
[01:00] <gnomefreak> like tb or ff
[01:00] <asac> yes
[01:00] <gnomefreak> tb more so
[01:00] <asac> tb just has no  proper dbgsym package
[01:00] <gnomefreak> ah
[01:00] <asac> because the package does not work well with dbg_create_dbgsym
[01:01] <asac> i am producing one for now
[01:01] <asac> and will upload fixed version to feisty, so we get good dbgsym in future automatically
[01:01] <gnomefreak> ok cool
[01:03] <gnomefreak> this is crap but there are a few things in threadstack that have info but not much help im gonna assume.
[01:04] <gnomefreak> my retrace looks exactly like his stack and thread stack
[01:04] <gnomefreak> but thats good because im not seeing the errors i do with ff.
[01:04] <gnomefreak> im gonna run a firefox one to see whats up :)
[01:14] <gnomefreak> asac: did heno give you a testcase on the tb crash by chance?
[01:15] <asac> hmmm not
[01:15] <asac> maybe ask him
[01:15] <asac> but i think its not reproducible
[01:16] <asac> at least not easily
[01:16] <gnomefreak> well ill put it on hold till you get the package ready
[01:21] <asac> yup
[01:23] <asac> mozilla-thunderbird-dbgsym
[01:25] <asac> damn
[01:25] <asac> X crashed
[01:25] <asac> somehow
[01:25] <asac> no crash report though
[01:27] <asac> ok
[01:27] <asac> dbgsym are in mt-feisty
[01:27] <asac> you need to pull them by hand i guess
[01:27] <asac> they appear to be not included in Packages
[01:27] <asac> file
[01:27] <asac> so
[01:27] <asac> if version is wrong, let me know
[01:28] <asac> i can respin with -1
[01:29] <gnomefreak> they are on preview archive?
[01:31] <gnomefreak> asac: version should be ubuntu1 iirc butt i will check soon. you also need to respin 386 unless you want me to
[01:32] <asac> oh
[01:32] <asac> yes i'll do
[01:32] <asac> let me first upload the fixed package
[01:32] <asac> then I do a respin for i386
[01:32] <asac> for ubuntu1
[01:33] <gnomefreak> ok coll im working on a ff retrace atm so whenever you get it just ping me
[01:33] <asac> will take at least 40min ... because i386 chroot is indeed slower than mighty amd64 ;)
[01:40] <gnomefreak> thast fine ill do it later this afternoon than. my aunt has a meeting in 20 minutes and than 2 others after that i would rather not tie up bandwidth incase she needs pc during meetings
[01:41] <gnomefreak> and i really dont like this "Backtrace stopped: previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)"
[01:41] <asac> yes thats a pita
[01:41] <asac> we could close these bugs ... but hjmf apparently can retrace them
[01:45] <gnomefreak> he can?
[01:45] <gnomefreak> oh on fx?
[01:47] <asac> yes
[01:47] <asac> afaik
[01:47] <asac> he managed to do traces on reports that you (an me) failed on
[01:47] <gnomefreak> im trying one more fx retrace before im done for a the morning.
[01:47] <gnomefreak> im kind of wondering how (what does he do differently :(
[01:51] <gnomefreak> bbl
[01:51] <asac> ok ... i can do ppc retraces :)
[01:51] <asac> on ubuntu machine
[01:52] <asac> so if you have one let me know
[01:52] <asac> gnomefreak: you have one bug that you got frame PC on ?
[01:53] <asac> i have access to pitti on-server-retrace environment and want to see what those yield
[01:53] <gnomefreak> there is on eor 2 ppc bugs needing retracing in you look at the tags page under mt-needretrace. ( i think i changed sumary to add PPC in it
[01:53] <gnomefreak> i dont have bug off hand
[01:55] <asac> yeah ... but one with those "no frame PC" ?
[01:55] <asac> i would like to try if pitti i386 environment fixes it
[01:55] <gnomefreak> k its bug 90027 that does that here
[01:55] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 90027 in firefox "[apport]  firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall()" [High,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/90027
[01:56] <gnomefreak> im in middle of trying something on it atm
[01:56] <asac> ok
[01:56] <asac> will try
[01:56] <gnomefreak> Backtrace stopped: previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)
[01:57] <gnomefreak> that is after thread 10 #19
[01:57] <asac> ok
[01:58] <gnomefreak> full stack that i get --- stack trace ---
[01:58] <gnomefreak> #0  0xb7f8b410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
[01:58] <gnomefreak> #1  0xb7ddd4f1 in raise () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
[01:58] <gnomefreak> #2  0x08057836 in ?? ()
[01:58] <gnomefreak> #3  0x0000000b in ?? ()
[01:58] <gnomefreak> #4  0xbfe5f2ec in ?? ()
[01:58] <gnomefreak> #5  0x00000000 in ?? ()
[01:58] <gnomefreak> --- thread stack trace ---
[01:58] <asac> lets see
[01:58] <asac> on ronne
[01:58] <gnomefreak> ok im gone for a while
[01:58] <asac> yeah same dump
[01:58] <asac> trace
[01:58] <asac> cu
[02:00] <gnomefreak> if you get around to it ask him what that error means and see if he can figure out why we cant retrace it even on his pc please. im going back to bed i think
[02:01] <asac> ok sleep well
[02:02] <asac> ill wait and see if hjmf can retrace
[02:02] <asac> anyway ...in this case stack looks really corrupted
[02:02] <asac> its not the same message with frame PC ... you know
[02:02] <asac> anyway ... relax
[02:04] <AlexLatchford> gnomefreak: you called last night?
[02:06] <asac> gnomefreak: ok dbgsym packages for tbird are in mt-feisty
[02:06] <asac> ubunt1 + i386
[02:13] <AlexLatchford> asac: whats the package name?
[02:21] <asac> of dbgsym?
[02:22] <asac> AlexLatchford: ^
[02:22] <asac> ?
[02:22] <AlexLatchford> oh dbgsym lol
[02:22] <AlexLatchford> mewh ill keep quiet
[02:22] <asac> http://people.ubuntu.com/~asac/mt-feisty/mozilla-thunderbird-dbgsym_1.5.0.10-0ubuntu1_i386.ddeb
[02:22] <asac> i think you have to install by hand
[02:22] <asac> aka dpkg -i
[02:22] <AlexLatchford> yes
[02:22] <asac> do to retraces
[02:23] <AlexLatchford> yeah I need to read the guide first, should be able to get through it later on tonight
[02:23] <AlexLatchford> have to go out to College now
[02:23] <AlexLatchford> :( talk to you guys later
[02:23] <asac> its just that tbird debian/rules was broken so pittis dbgsym were not proper for tbird
[02:23] <asac> cu
[02:44] <asac> hmm ... so how big are firefox-dbg packages? maybe tbird -dbgsym are only that small because they are not proper?
[02:45] <asac> firefox-dbgsym package i mean
[02:58] <asac> ok found ... -dbgsym packages are ment to be same size as -dbg
[02:58] <asac> uploaded fixed -dbgsym now
[04:11] <asac> poningru: gavinbaker?
[06:22] <hjmf> hello all
[06:22] <hjmf> asac: when you have some time. Take a look to bug #90039 and bug #90037
[06:22] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 90039 in firefox "[apport]  firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall()" [Undecided,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/90039
[06:22] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 90037 in firefox "firefox crash in libflashplayer.so [@g_timeout_dispatch]  " [Undecided,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/90037
[06:23] <hjmf> I couldnt get a good retrace but both seem to be caused by flashplugin
[06:24] <hjmf> what is our policy then? should I close them?
[06:27] <asac> hmm for bug 90039
[06:27] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 90039 in firefox "[apport]  firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall()" [Undecided,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/90039
[06:27] <asac> we have no chance
[06:27] <asac> maybe ensure that xorg dbgsym packages are installed
[06:27] <asac> as well as libc
[06:28] <asac> to get at least line numbers for
[06:28] <asac> #26 0xb6703395 in XtDispatchEventToWidget () from /usr/lib/libXt.so.6
[06:28] <asac> and libc code above
[06:28] <asac> otherwise close
[06:28] <asac> i already added summary to bug 90037
[06:28] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 90037 in firefox "firefox crash in libflashplayer.so [@g_timeout_dispatch]  " [Undecided,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/90037
[06:28] <asac> this can stay that way
[06:28] <asac> we already have a master bug for that
[06:28] <asac> will look at some time if they are really duplicates
[06:29] <hjmf> asac: ok I'll retrace it again with those packages but apport didn't complaint about them
[06:29] <asac> yeah
[06:29] <asac> maybe install -dbg packages for them by hand
[06:29] <asac> if that does not help
[06:29] <asac> kill it
[06:30] <hjmf> ok
[06:30] <asac> we should definitly find some adobe tech contact we can forward flashplayer crashes to
[06:30] <asac> otherwise we have to close them
[06:30] <asac> except we have something similar already (e.g. like g_timeout_dispatch)
[06:43] <hjmf> see you
[08:25] <gnomefreak> I cant file a frigging bug. im going to walk away now and come back later as i have been at this for a long time.
[08:38] <gnomefreak> asac: can you package a -dbg package for edgy thunderbird (just for our use) so we can retrace tb crashes on edgy? i tried the -dbgsym package for tb 1.5.0.10 and it didnt make a difference on bug 90348, i think we should see if hjmf can come up with a better one using the -dbgsym package. i tried both with the crashreport locally and from bug report same thing happens. i am told "Backtrace stopped: previous frame inner to this f
[08:38] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 90348 in mozilla-thunderbird "[apport]  mozilla-thunderbird-bin crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall()" [High,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/90348
[08:41] <gnomefreak> s/sot/not
[09:52] <gnomefreak> asac: we dont have a master bug for nsAppStartup::Init crashes? referring to bug 88503. or are we just marking all of the GTK ones dupes of any of the GTK master bugs?
[09:52] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 88503 in firefox "Firefox crash while scrolling a mapquest map" [High,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/88503
[09:53] <gnomefreak> or its nsAppShell::Release
[10:19] <gnomefreak> hjmf: you here?
[10:20] <gnomefreak> I think we need to make one of the [@g_timeout_dispatch]  bugs a master bug. If there were others marked that way before bug 89601 than the other one but if not mark 89601 as master IMHO
[10:20] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 89601 in firefox "firefox crash in libflashplayer.so [@g_timeout_dispatch] " [Undecided,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/89601
[10:27] <hjmf> gnomefreak: agree, would you change that bug's summary
[10:28] <gnomefreak> yep
[10:28] <hjmf> I'm going to log off
[10:28] <gnomefreak> ok
[10:28] <hjmf> gnomefreak: good night
[10:28] <gnomefreak> hjmf: night
[10:41] <gnomefreak> asac: also what can we do about bug 48714
[10:41] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 48714 in firefox ""Getting started" and "Latest Headlines" not localized." [Medium,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/48714