=== Monk-e [n=guido@c529dd229.cable.wanadoo.nl] has joined #ubuntu-devel === jrib [n=jasonr@upstream/dev/jrib] has joined #ubuntu-devel === mbiebl [n=michael@e180071170.adsl.alicedsl.de] has joined #ubuntu-devel === jsgotangco [n=jsg123@ubuntu/member/jsgotangco] has joined #ubuntu-devel [12:51] Riddell: Fixed. [12:52] infinity: what was up? === dsas [n=dean@cpc3-stok6-0-0-cust253.bagu.cable.ntl.com] has joined #ubuntu-devel === Monk-e [n=guido@c529dd229.cable.wanadoo.nl] has joined #ubuntu-devel === illovae [n=illovae@uni14-1-82-233-221-131.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel === khermans__ [i=administ@nat/cisco/x-88dea5508e96366d] has joined #ubuntu-devel === doko_ [n=doko@dslb-088-073-088-010.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel === illovae [n=illovae@uni14-1-82-233-221-131.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel === ailean [n=ailean@82-40-205-105.cable.ubr07.uddi.blueyonder.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-devel === illovae [n=illovae@uni14-1-82-233-221-131.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel [01:08] Riddell: A bit of a hiccup on drescher, s'all. [01:13] infinity: Hi. Any progress on the HASH bug in the buildds? === ogra [n=ogra@ubuntu/member/ogra] has joined #ubuntu-devel === illovae [n=illovae@uni14-1-82-233-221-131.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel === ogra_ [n=ogra@p548AFD38.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel === illovae [n=illovae@uni14-1-82-233-221-131.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel === illovae [n=illovae@uni14-1-82-233-221-131.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel === illovae [n=illovae@uni14-1-82-233-221-131.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel === Mez [n=Mez@ubuntu/member/mez] has joined #ubuntu-devel [01:30] keescook: gnupg2 2.0.3 was released today (primarly including a patch for the gnupg security problem). I've already new packages ready. [01:30] Should I try to get an UVF exception for it? [01:32] geser: yeah, go for it. [01:33] I need to do the gnupg2 backports still, but it's currently a lower priority than other stuff [01:36] the security announcement also provides a patch for gpgme 1.1.3 [01:36] but we still have gpgme 0.3.16 (first uploaded to warty) :( [01:37] geser: there's also gpgme1.0 [01:37] that would explain why it's so old :) === sistpoty [n=sistpoty@ubuntu/member/sistpoty] has joined #ubuntu-devel === pax [n=pax@pdpc/supporter/student/pax] has joined #ubuntu-devel === stdin_ [n=tez@unaffiliated/binary2k2] has joined #ubuntu-devel === freeflying [i=root@ubuntu/member/freeflying] has joined #ubuntu-devel [01:44] tfheen: How many packages would fall under [01:45] tfheen: sorry, wrong question... copy/paste error... just wanted to ping you about binary only removals, thx === TomB_ [n=tomb@host217-44-151-84.range217-44.btcentralplus.com] has joined #ubuntu-devel === illovae [n=illovae@uni14-1-82-233-221-131.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel [01:46] tfheen: as in if ubuntu-archive came to a decision already === licio [n=licio@ubuntu/member/licio] has joined #ubuntu-devel === illovae [n=illovae@uni14-1-82-233-221-131.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel === illovae [n=illovae@uni14-1-82-233-221-131.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel === illovae [n=illovae@uni14-1-82-233-221-131.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel === fbond_ is now known as fbond === _jason [n=jasonr@upstream/dev/jrib] has joined #ubuntu-devel === iceman [n=iceman@cable-87-244-154-165.upc.chello.be] has joined #ubuntu-devel === bddebian [n=bdefrees@c-71-224-172-103.hsd1.pa.comcast.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel === j_ack [n=rudi@p508DBE1A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #ubuntu-devel === cr3 [n=marc@pdpc/supporter/bronze/cr3] has joined #ubuntu-devel === lukaswayne9 [n=lukas@c-68-84-69-12.hsd1.nj.comcast.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel === Hobbsee [n=Hobbsee@ubuntu/member/hobbsee] has joined #ubuntu-devel === slomo_ [n=slomo@ubuntu/member/slomo] has joined #ubuntu-devel === ryan [n=ryan@ip68-230-209-186.rd.hr.cox.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel === ScottLij [n=roivas@66-227-218-192.dhcp.klmz.mi.charter.com] has joined #ubuntu-devel === zul [n=chuck@CPE0006258ec6c1-CM000a73655d0e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has joined #ubuntu-devel === Hobbsee [n=Hobbsee@ubuntu/member/hobbsee] has joined #ubuntu-devel === theCore [n=alex@ubuntu/member/theCore] has joined #ubuntu-devel === quail [n=quail@unaffiliated/quaillinux/x-000001] has joined #ubuntu-devel === johanbr [n=j@blk-137-114-65.eastlink.ca] has joined #ubuntu-devel === nags [n=nags@122.167.110.76] has joined #ubuntu-devel === beuno [n=martin@host66.201-253-136.telecom.net.ar] has joined #ubuntu-devel === exobuzz [n=jools@82-70-241-14.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk] has left #ubuntu-devel ["Konversation] === stub [n=stub@ppp-58.8.13.46.revip2.asianet.co.th] has joined #ubuntu-devel === Arrogance [n=aks@ottawa-hs-209-217-84-120.d-ip.magma.ca] has joined #ubuntu-devel === illovae [n=illovae@uni14-1-82-233-221-131.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel === stub [n=stub@ppp-58.8.13.46.revip2.asianet.co.th] has joined #ubuntu-devel [04:36] elkbuntu: have you considered openid for ubuntucounter? :P === illovae [n=illovae@uni14-1-82-233-221-131.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel === illovae [n=illovae@uni14-1-82-233-221-131.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel === j_ack [n=rudi@p508DBE1A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #ubuntu-devel === delire [n=delire@lawn-128-61-118-174.lawn.gatech.edu] has joined #ubuntu-devel === AnAnt [n=anant@62.114.91.143] has joined #ubuntu-devel [05:15] Hello, anyone knows what has changed from Edgy to Feisty regarding virtual console (keymap,translations,...) ? === asac_ [n=asac@debian/developer/asac] has joined #ubuntu-devel === `anthony [n=anthony@ekorp-60-242-130-196.eoff.ekorp.com] has joined #ubuntu-devel === nags [n=nags@125.16.129.16] has joined #ubuntu-devel === ScottLij [n=roivas@66-227-218-192.dhcp.klmz.mi.charter.com] has joined #ubuntu-devel === Fujitsu [n=Fujitsu@ubuntu/member/fujitsu] has joined #ubuntu-devel === jdong [n=jdong@ubuntu/member/jdong] has joined #ubuntu-devel [06:15] anyone have experience with the Python bugtracker? [06:15] I found a typo in Python.... [06:15] >>> (1-24j)**34324324 [06:15] OverflowError: complex exponentiaion [06:16] it seems to have survived from python2.3 to 2.5, at least [06:22] what's wrong with that? [06:24] "exponentiaion" [06:25] Chipzz: are you a Python developer by any chance? ;-) [06:26] jdong: no, not at all :) [06:27] jdong: I was looking at the code instead of the line below ;) [06:27] hehe [06:27] silly me :P [06:27] found it while... err... traversing a polynomial for a real solution [06:28] (and of course it didn't have any) [06:28] brute-force attack? :) [06:28] of course :) [06:28] we got an e-mail a week and a half ago stating that spawning mathematica/matlab is not an acceptable algorithm anymore [06:28] the "anymore" part concerned me :D [06:29] heh [06:29] you really don't want to program in matlab anyway :P [06:29] I know, but when your assignment is to write an arbitrary matrix inverter, it's tempting. [06:30] especially since you know the validator has mathematica and matlab installed.... [06:30] from the little experience I have with matlab, it looks impossible to create a clean solution to certain problems [06:30] it's ok but not fantastic [06:30] simulink is cool though [06:30] realtime workshop.... click button and C code comes out [06:30] the lack of any kind of references sucks monkey balls [06:31] it's not that kind of programming language, lol === stephanbuys [n=stephanb@196.44.1.98] has joined #ubuntu-devel [06:32] the problem I once had was a large matrix, and I needed to call a function which changed it quite a lot of times [06:33] ah [06:33] yeah then performance will blow [06:33] the solution to that is to give the matrix as a parameter, and return a copy of the modified version [06:33] yeah [06:33] it copies it every time [06:33] so [06:33] it was either that [06:33] or use a global variable [06:33] both solutions suck :P [06:34] well you're supposed to cave into global variable peer pressure [06:34] a reference type would have helped there [06:35] no. bad compiz. do that again and beryl's going back on. === jdong hates it when windows get stuck in infinite wobble-snap [06:36] jdong: I've only ever had that issue with Beryl. [06:36] Fujitsu: really? [06:37] compiz is doing that to me like every 1 of 10 times I maximize a terminal [06:37] with other maximized apps in the background [06:37] it simply wiggles forever [06:37] it's very annoying when trying to type into it [06:37] Hah. [06:37] it's like giving a directional derivatives lecture to a room of people with ADD. [06:37] A couple of weeks back, I made the mistake of shrinking a window slightly vertically. [06:38] It proceeded to bounce between the two ends for eternity. [06:38] "now you... you take the gradient.... the grad.. HEY SIT DOWN. STOP JUMPING" [06:38] ha, we should have a silly beryl tricks contest :) [06:39] submission #1: Compiz: [06:39] http://web.mit.edu/~jdong/www/wobble.ogg [06:39] got 3 windows to wobble indefinitely [06:39] and for some reason firefox started bouncing a bit too [06:39] Nice, jdong. [06:40] :) === jdong gets bored, and contemplates between sleeping or filing more wisecrack bugs === Chipzz goes to sleep [06:42] bug 54776 was pretty good.... despite it was a dupe :( [06:42] Malone bug 54776 in openoffice.org "font hinting does not work with libfreetype6 v. 2.2.1" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/54776 [06:42] umm [06:42] bug 90636 [06:42] rather :) [06:42] Malone bug 90636 in openoffice.org "Openoffice fonts aren't blurry enough (dup-of: 54776)" [Undecided,Unconfirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/90636 [06:42] Malone bug 54776 in openoffice.org "font hinting does not work with libfreetype6 v. 2.2.1" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/54776 [06:47] oh for the love of libpthread, come up you stupid mailserver :( === Hobbsee [n=Hobbsee@ubuntu/member/hobbsee] has joined #ubuntu-devel [06:50] Hobbsee: waah, make it work... poke my mailserver with your long pointy stick === Hobbsee pokes the mailserver with the Long Pointy Stick of DOOM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [06:51] yay! [06:51] jdong: what's it doing? [06:51] Hobbsee: well apparently it's been fscking for the past 30 hours [06:52] fun [06:52] That's NOTHING. [06:52] snapshot.debian.net was fscking for a couple of months, I believe. [06:52] well... I was supposed to be getting 2 homework assignemnts thru e-mail [06:52] due tomorrow === pax_ [n=pax@ool-4579df6e.dyn.optonline.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel [06:52] and it's 1AM :( === jdong brews more coffee [06:53] Fujitsu: well, I shall see how long the mailserver takes.... apparently they've given up on fsck and are mounting it ro and copying everything onto a new RAID === j1mc [n=jim@adsl-75-21-78-129.dsl.chcgil.sbcglobal.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel === khermans__ [i=administ@nat/cisco/x-8c8d547158208495] has joined #ubuntu-devel === tkjacobsen [n=tkjacobs@105.18.235.85.dk-boa.res.dyn.perspektivbredband.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel === shackan [n=shackan@85-18-14-13.fastres.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel === marilize [n=marilize@dumbledore.hbd.com] has joined #ubuntu-devel === delire [n=delire@lawn-128-61-118-174.lawn.gatech.edu] has joined #ubuntu-devel === Lure [n=lure@external-7.hermes.si] has joined #ubuntu-devel === pitti [n=pitti@195.227.105.180] has joined #ubuntu-devel [08:08] Good morning [08:10] Morgen pitti :) [08:10] hi pitti === pitti hugs tepsipakki and ajmitch [08:11] pitti: seems that I forgot to create the series-file for quilt in libxcb, crimsun fixed it [08:11] tepsipakki: ah, toss me a debdiff, then I'll upload [08:12] it's uploaded already, -1ubuntu2 === Hobbsee hugs pitti === fabbione wonders who did pull in libglade2/3 in main [08:15] glide even [08:16] installing those libraries is a moot point without a bunch of other stuff includeing the 3dfx kernel module [08:17] and they ask questions at install time that needs to be preseeded with sane defaults to be of any use [08:17] otherwise default install will suck [08:17] they were left out for a veeeeery good reason [08:18] tepsipakki: anyway you are doing a really good job up till now.. i am impressed [08:22] fabbione: thanks ;) [08:23] fabbione: libglide2/3 are in main? Seem to be in universe here.. [08:23] fabbione: how do you mean? glide source and binaries are in universe === giftnudel [n=mb@p54A93122.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #ubuntu-devel === viviersf [n=cain@196.44.1.98] has joined #ubuntu-devel [08:37] pitti: they have been pulled in by this morning update... might be a depends: change.. [08:37] tepsipakki: ^^ [08:38] this damn developers that needs stuff from universe.. [08:39] <_ion> Hi pitti [08:39] <_ion> Did you get my email? [08:39] fabbione: right, but there's no MIR, thus noone promotes it; it's just a broken Dependency then, I guess [08:40] _ion: yup, saw it, thank you! will merge and answer you [08:40] pitti: ok :) [08:40] <_ion> pitti: If you use bzr merge --pull, it will probably just pull the change, unless the branches have diverged, btw. === Riddell [i=jr@muse.19inch.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel [08:42] _ion: right, or just 'bzr pull' :) [08:43] <_ion> Yeah, that works if one already knows they haven't diverged. :-) === robitaille [n=daniel@ubuntu/member/robitaille] has joined #ubuntu-devel === jsgotangco [n=jsg123@ubuntu/member/jsgotangco] has joined #ubuntu-devel === Riddell [i=jr@muse.19inch.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel === Monk-e [n=guido@c529dd229.cable.wanadoo.nl] has joined #ubuntu-devel [08:59] argh, no LP === eXistenZ [n=existenz@unaffiliated/eXistenZ] has joined #ubuntu-devel === pitti throws the archive admin hat back into the corner then === mdke puts it on, just for fun === Zdra [n=zdra@56.179-247-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be] has joined #ubuntu-devel === bluefoxicy puts on the hat; the White Spy subsequently drops a piano on his head. === delire [n=delire@lawn-128-61-118-174.lawn.gatech.edu] has joined #ubuntu-devel === carlos [n=carlos@163.pool85-48-166.static.orange.es] has joined #ubuntu-devel === lfittl [n=lfittl@213.129.230.12] has joined #ubuntu-devel === thekorn [n=markus@a89-182-9-46.net-htp.de] has joined #ubuntu-devel === hunger [n=tobias@pd95b0676.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #ubuntu-devel [09:12] <_ion> Hey, that's offensive! You must surely mean the Caucasian Intelligence Officer. === delire [n=delire@lawn-128-61-118-174.lawn.gatech.edu] has joined #ubuntu-devel === Nuscly [n=nuscly@29-231.206-83.static-ip.oleane.fr] has joined #ubuntu-devel === jinty [n=jinty@247.Red-83-49-51.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel [09:31] tepsipakki: just curious but won't the xcb patch lead to apps deadlocking instead of aborting them? [09:32] no, it will ignore the locking check altogether === jack_wyt [n=jack@61.51.188.71] has joined #ubuntu-devel === raphink [n=raphink@ubuntu/member/raphink] has joined #ubuntu-devel [09:36] tepsipakki: hmm... but isn't this assertion done just before locking (or unlocking) to prevent a deadlock? i don't see how that patch could do something good ;) [09:37] the links are there for reference, pitti just reversed the logic ;) [09:40] tepsipakki: ok... do we have the mesa patch btw? and the locking issue in gtk was fixed some hours ago fortunately :) [09:41] oh, do you have the link to the gtk-fix? === mvo [n=egon@p54A67E49.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel [09:42] what was that mesa patch again? [09:42] tepsipakki: http://svn.gnome.org/viewcvs/gtk%2B/trunk/gdk/x11/gdkasync.c?r1=17436&r2=17435&pathrev=17436 [09:42] tepsipakki: i wanted to ask seb128 if he can include it with his next upload later [09:43] mvo: do you know a bit about python-notify? pynotify.defs has attach_to_status_icon(), but the .so doesn't [09:43] mvo: and I actually need this for restricted-manager [09:43] tepsipakki: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8521 [09:43] Freedesktop bug 8521 in GLX "AllocAndFetchScreenConfigs unlocks twice" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] === shiyee [n=Shiyee@0x503e778e.abnxx4.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk] has joined #ubuntu-devel [09:45] slomo_: you wanted that for dapper/edgy? [09:46] tepsipakki: hm? no [09:46] tepsipakki: i only wanted to know if we have this patch in feisty ;;) [09:46] that's in mesa-6.5.2 [09:46] which is in feisty [09:46] perfect [09:50] pitti: I haven't used that yet, but what about attach_to_widget? [09:51] mvo: a gtk.StatusIcon is not a widget [09:51] pitti: righ, you could just pack it into a eventbox to get a widget [09:52] mvo: yup, but how do I add the statusicon into it? [09:53] mvo: I think for precisely this problem libnotify has an attach_to_status_icon() :) [09:53] just the Python binding seems to be missing [09:53] pitti: some of the language-pack bits in http://people.ubuntu.com/~robertc/possible-conflicts/feisty/main.txt look like they just need extra Replaces [09:53] pitti: I'm done with the uploads [09:53] doko_: yay, thanks [09:54] cjwatson: ah, thanks; those are probably the ones that have never been updated since I added the misssing replaces [09:55] ok === dholbach [n=daniel@i59F752B1.versanet.de] has joined #ubuntu-devel [09:57] good morning === lfittl [n=lfittl@86.59.100.35] has joined #ubuntu-devel === seb128 [n=seb128@ubuntu/member/seb128] has joined #ubuntu-devel === lfittl_ [n=lfittl@213.129.230.12] has joined #ubuntu-devel [10:03] morning [10:04] pitti: I've started to look at the KDE packages waiting to NEW yesterday and I've questions about them [10:05] urgh, NEW? [10:05] does debian/copyright needs to list the copyright holders? [10:05] seb128: yes, it does [10:05] pitti: yeah, you know, where new source packages go [10:05] seb128: ah, you mean for feisty, not for the edgy-proposed thing [10:05] seb128: sorry, wrong mental context :) [10:05] np ;) [10:05] k, because they don't [10:06] another weird thing is [10:06] mvo: ah, simple bug, pynotify.c is not regenerated properly [10:06] aha [10:08] k, can't get it from NEW, will look later === delire [n=delire@lawn-128-61-118-174.lawn.gatech.edu] has joined #ubuntu-devel === lfittl [n=lfittl@213.129.230.12] has joined #ubuntu-devel === Gman [i=gman@nat/sun/x-3916c1debd932619] has joined #ubuntu-devel === delire_ [n=delire@lawn-128-61-118-174.lawn.gatech.edu] has joined #ubuntu-devel === arre [n=ac@alchemist.openend.se] has joined #ubuntu-devel === seb128 [n=seb128@ubuntu/member/seb128] has joined #ubuntu-devel === jinty [n=jinty@247.Red-83-49-51.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel === jono_ [n=jono@88-107-37-235.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com] has joined #ubuntu-devel === cassidy [n=cassidy@host-213-189-171-21.brutele.be] has joined #ubuntu-devel === Riddelll [n=jr@jasmine.wyrdweb.com] has joined #ubuntu-devel [10:54] wow, Riddell grew another 'l' :) [10:56] tepsipakki, mvo: so, can you please have a look at http://pastebin.ca/387387 if it looks sane for fglrx? [11:02] pitti, http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.quality/browse_thread/thread/9d42950d1147e8ed [11:02] (don't know whether you're interested) [11:03] mpt: indeed I am, and I saw it this morning; unfortunately I'm at a concert tonight, but I'll join the next meeting [11:04] pitti: looks good [11:04] mpt: are you going to be listening in? [11:05] if nobody else can, I might, although the timing isn't good for me either [11:05] pitti: looks good === Gman is now known as GmanZZZ [11:05] tepsipakki, mvo: thanks === jdub_ [n=jdub@home.waugh.id.au] has joined #ubuntu-devel === jdub_ is now known as jdub === Riddell [n=jr@muse.19inch.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel === dsas [n=dean@cpc3-stok6-0-0-cust253.bagu.cable.ntl.com] has joined #ubuntu-devel [11:16] cjwatson, sorry, I'll be busy being a weekend tourist guide [11:17] (and I probably couldn't contribute/understand much anyway, I iz just a UI designah) [11:23] Riddell: I just uploaded a new example-content and did some small changes - if you want to update Kubuntu related changes, I added the branch URL in XS-Vcs-Bzr [11:24] Riddell: or if you know somebody who'd like to do that (maybe kwwii?) [11:24] cjwatson, if you attend, be aware that Benjamin Smedberg's PT-to-UTC conversion isn't accurate [11:25] dholbach: did a lot change? [11:25] kwwii: no, I merely changed some occurences of 6.06 and 6.10 [11:26] kwwii: I just saw that the Kubuntu presentation has "Add Image Here" in it and still mentions powerpc [11:26] kwwii: and it's 3 times as big as the ubuntu one :) === sky_walkie [i=czzhrd02@xdsl-563.lodz.dialog.net.pl] has joined #ubuntu-devel [11:30] dholbach: I'll look into that [11:31] kwwii: super [11:32] beta.lp sure is oopsing a LOT [11:35] Seveas: every 3rd HTTP request or so, it seems. [11:38] beta's working again? [11:38] hm, I had two 'oops -- no css -- looks normal' cycles now [11:38] ah, thanks for the notification Seveas :-) [11:39] pitti, the technical term for that is FOUC [11:39] Flash Of Unstyled Content [11:39] mpt: but certainly not for the oopses :) [11:39] The non-technical term is "Style sheet, I've waited too long for you to arrive, so I'm going to draw the page anyway" [11:40] True, not for the oopses [11:40] mpt: No, it's style-sheet, I got an OOPS page in return, so it's not valid, so I'm not going to render you. [11:40] Top Men are working on those [11:41] Fujitsu, I find it very difficult to believe that the style sheet would return an OOPS [11:41] we don't do any database queries for the style sheet :-) [11:41] It did. [11:41] Try it. [11:41] Refresh a few times. [11:41] You'll get one (/+icing/style.css, for example) [11:42] mpt: heh, good point [11:42] You get a nice beta-styled oops. [11:42] WOW [11:43] Or I've somehow managed to insert OOPS-433BD703 into the magical database. [11:43] haha [11:43] I was going to say "Loaded it ten times, no oopses" [11:43] mpt: Hah. [11:43] even mpt is suprised about LP - scary! [11:43] but then it oopsed at the bottom of the ninth [11:43] with bases loaded [11:43] mpt: Any idea what's happening!? [11:43] all your launchpad are belong to OOPS [11:43] Surely there's no DB-foo behind it... [11:43] Fujitsu, I said Top Men are working on it [11:43] "Launchpad will be going offline for maintenance very very soon." [11:43] Honestly, do I look like a Top Man? [11:43] hmm, I thought it just came back? [11:44] mpt, yes [11:44] I don't even have any muscles. [11:44] mpt: Ah, didn't see that. [11:44] pitti: it did. it decided it didnt like life, so is in hiding again. [11:44] Hobbsee, lp has a marvin attitude? [11:44] Seveas: seems so... [11:45] Lp. DOn't talk to me about lp. [11:45] haha [11:45] I think you ought to know, I'm feeling very OOPS'ed [11:46] lol === sladen [i=paul@starsky.19inch.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel === xerxas [n=r67894@AGrenoble-257-1-39-9.w86-206.abo.wanadoo.fr] has joined #ubuntu-devel === Spads [n=spacehob@217.205.109.249] has joined #ubuntu-devel [11:50] OOPS has taken the BSOD top spot ;) === cypher1 [i=cypher1@nat/hp/x-2a33c65a42378ae6] has joined #ubuntu-devel === Riddell [i=jr@kde/jriddell] has joined #ubuntu-devel [11:53] pitti: I screwed up again, the python-kde package is missing the necessary new function and a symlink [11:54] pitti: which is all very annoying, it's not like I didn't test this stuff three times [11:54] pitti: http://kubuntu.org/~jriddell/tmp/pykde.debdiff === KP202 [n=ach@cp106356-a.tilbu1.nb.home.nl] has joined #ubuntu-devel [12:00] pitti: and http://kubuntu.org/~jriddell/tmp/adept.debdiff [12:05] Riddell: looks fine [12:06] Riddell: not sure whether uploads will work, though, but just try :) [12:06] mm, but it looked fine last time. grump [12:06] thanks === Keybuk [n=scott@quest.netsplit.com] has joined #ubuntu-devel === pitti waves to Keybuk [12:08] heyhey [12:08] Hi Keybuk. === Hobbsee waves to Keybuk too, and drops an anvil on pitti's head [12:09] ouch [12:09] Hobbsee: how did I earn that? [12:09] pitti: the lack of greeting from earlier :P [12:09] Riddell: your new KDE4 packages have no copyright holders listed to debian/copyright [12:09] Hobbsee: *big hug* [12:10] pitti: :D *big hug back* === Fujitsu runs off with the anvil. [12:10] kde4multimedia has files under the LGPL, it doesn't ship a copy of the text though [12:11] that is weird [12:11] " * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or [12:11] * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public [12:11] * License version 2 as published by the Free Software Foundation. [12:11] ... [12:11] * You should have received a copy of the GNU Library General Public License [12:11] * along with this library; see the file COPYING.LIB. If not, write to [12:11] * the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor," [12:11] [12:11] is that normal to have file under the GPL with an indication of where to get the LGPL? [12:12] seb128: it's the same copying file as in the KDE 3 package [12:12] which probably hasn't changed much since KDE 0.1 === sahin_h [n=ezaz@dsl5400DACF.pool.t-online.hu] has joined #ubuntu-devel [12:12] seb128: the 'a little bit more than lesser GPL'? === giftnudel [n=mb@x429.vpn.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de] has joined #ubuntu-devel [12:13] pitti: no, just wondering why it says the file is "under the terms of the GNU General Public" and mentions the "GNU Library General Public License" then [12:14] seb128: right, I noticed [12:14] that's from kdeadmin [12:16] oh joy I think I've deleted all the kde4* packages from my local hard disk [12:16] seb128: if you reject them can you put the sources somewhere I can get at them? [12:17] Riddell: I'm not going to reject them, I'm not comfortable enough on source NEW yet, I'll let tfheen or pitti do them [12:17] Riddell: I think you have to ship at least the LGPL text with the package [12:18] seb128: if debian/copyright does not have copyright holders, and the upstream license is wrong, then they need to be rejected [12:18] dunno if debian/copyright has to list the copyright holders, they don't [12:18] or point to it in common licences === stu1 [n=stub@ppp-58.8.5.151.revip2.asianet.co.th] has joined #ubuntu-devel [12:18] Riddell: no [12:18] but it's no worse than what's in the current KDE 3 packages in debian and ubuntu [12:18] Riddell: pointer is good for debian/copyright, but *not* for orig.tar.gz's [12:18] pitti: why not? [12:18] and dunno if source mentionning the GPL and then the LGPL is a problem to fix [12:18] oh, I see [12:19] seb128: can you put the sources somewhere I can get at them? [12:19] seb128: it's ok to license some parts as lgpl and some as gpl, but upstream's files have to tell which license applies in the file headers, and debian/copyright needs to list the various parts [12:21] pitti: could you have a look to kdeadmin, kuser/ku_usermodel.cpp for example? === pitti gives up doing SRUs and syncs due to LP being too broken [12:21] and let me know if you think it's correct [12:21] seb128: fetching [12:21] Riddell: will do [12:23] pitti: was supposed to be more fixed, too [12:23] seb128: looks fine to me, what's wrong wit it? [12:24] pitti: k, I was not sure about the file being GPL and then pointing to LGPL and COPYING.LIB (which is not shipped with the tarball) === jack_at_home [n=jack@221.223.21.60] has joined #ubuntu-devel [12:24] Riddell: d/copyright also needs to point out which parts are under the docbook license [12:24] seb128: it's certainly weird that it's COPYING.LIB, and not COPYING; so if COPYING.LIB is the GPL, that's fine [12:25] seb128: oh, indeed that doesn't exist. that's wrong then [12:25] pitti: well, it's written "You should have received a copy of the GNU Library General Public License" [12:25] seb128: ah, you are right [12:25] this is completely screwed up then [12:25] seb128: sorry, I didn't read hard enough [12:26] np [12:27] pitti: since it's your archive day I'll let you reject the uploads if that's ok with you. Could you also copy them on chinstrap or somewhere for Riddell? [12:27] seb128: sure [12:27] thank you [12:29] pitti, seb128: by the way I care less about KDE 4 today than about libkexiv getting through NEW [12:29] Riddell: trying, depends on how much lp loves me [12:30] Riddell: ah, I though tfheen was going to do it since he said it was ok during the meeting [12:31] Riddell: I guess you want it in main; is there a MIR or is it a code splitout? [12:32] pitti: it's code that has been split out of the previous version of digikam [12:32] Riddell: ah, so main [12:32] yes please === Hobbsee wonders what the point of KDE4 is if MOTU is wanting to veto it going into universe, without uvfe's === stu1 [n=stub@ppp-58.8.5.151.revip2.asianet.co.th] has joined #ubuntu-devel [12:35] Riddell: libkexiv2 source-NEWed [12:35] pitti: thanks === gismo [n=stef@89.28.145.214] has joined #ubuntu-devel [12:36] Riddell: http://people.ubuntu.com/~pitti/tmp/kde4/ [12:36] Riddell: I'll reject kde4network then, do you need another mail or is above IRC discussion enough? [12:37] Riddell: erm, s/network/admin/ [12:37] seb128: did you already check the other kde packages, too? [12:38] pitti: admin and multimedia [12:38] not the others [12:39] seb128: mm had the same problem or was ok? [12:39] is has problems [12:39] at least not shipping the LGPL text and no copyright holder [12:40] seb128: no copyright holder where? [12:41] pitti: irc is fine [12:42] Riddell: debian/copyright has no copyrights [12:42] seb128: Have you seen an issue with Edgy where icons for the Games don't show up in the menu and the update-notifier icon doesn't display either? [12:43] hmm, right === pkl_ [n=phillip@lougher.demon.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-devel [12:44] StevenK: no, looks like an outdated cache [12:45] brb === jwendell [n=wendell@ubuntu/member/wendell] has joined #ubuntu-devel === lotusleaf [n=drywind@kernel-panic/member/carne.asada.burrito] has joined #ubuntu-devel === WaterSevenUb [n=WaterSev@azevedo.astro.up.pt] has joined #ubuntu-devel === seb128 [n=seb128@ubuntu/member/seb128] has joined #ubuntu-devel === lotusleaf [n=drywind@kernel-panic/member/carne.asada.burrito] has left #ubuntu-devel ["trombone"] [12:54] Riddell: kde4edu is hte same problem: missing COPYING.LIB and no copyright in debian/copyright; === cerbero_626 [n=kvirc@p213.54.182.217.tisdip.tiscali.de] has joined #ubuntu-devel [12:56] pitti: ok [12:57] I'll need to fix this all upstream [12:57] which is not a-typical of KDE [12:57] right, probably the other sources have a similar problem [12:58] pitti: adept and pykde seem to be accepted into edgy-proposed ready for approval [12:58] Riddell: done [01:00] seb128: Your cache answer was spot-on, thanks. [01:00] StevenK: np === Eons [n=asd@host-84-220-118-229.cust-adsl.tiscali.it] has joined #ubuntu-devel === supervillain [n=joelbrya@124.104.11.164] has joined #ubuntu-devel [01:02] Riddell: which package provides kde-config? I need to rebuild skim for the Maintainer: change [01:03] hello, is apt-proxy secure? can I trust an apt-proxy server? [01:03] pitti: kdelibs4c2a [01:04] urgh, 20 MB deps just to rebuild a source package :/ [01:04] pitti: don't build it, just debuild -S and upload ;) [01:04] seb128: right, but even that needs kde-config, scons, and everything [01:05] ah [01:05] debuild -S shouldn't, only scons and cdbs [01:06] Riddell: scons -c is called in clean, that needs all the stuff [01:06] ah well, I guess there's a reason KDE dropped scons :) [01:06] Checking for the qt library : qt was not found [01:07] grr [01:07] I have libqt3-mt-dev [01:08] supervillain: ask the guys that wrote it? [01:08] tfheen: did you see that sync-request about discover-data? === juell [n=jga@p213.54.182.217.tisdip.tiscali.de] has joined #ubuntu-devel === jsgotangco [n=jsg123@ubuntu/member/jsgotangco] has joined #ubuntu-devel === cerbero_626 [n=kvirc@p213.54.182.217.tisdip.tiscali.de] has left #ubuntu-devel [] === TeTeT [n=spindler@modemcable178.77-70-69.static.videotron.ca] has joined #ubuntu-devel === rpereira [n=rpereira@ubuntu/member/rpereira] has joined #ubuntu-devel === digitalspaghetti [n=digitals@host217-37-122-77.in-addr.btopenworld.com] has joined #ubuntu-devel === roico [n=roico@bzq-88-154-133-185.red.bezeqint.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel === kagou [n=kagou@86.75.162.18] has joined #ubuntu-devel === kwwii_ [n=kwwii@p549551D6.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel [01:28] cjwatson: I just noticed that libgucharmap is NBS in feisty (gucharmap builds soname 6 now); do these packages need to be removed manually, or will you do it in a big wave at some point? [01:29] pitti: archive-cruft-check scans for that; feel free to remove stuff in there after a cursory check [01:29] (remove-package.py -m '(pitti) NBS' -b foo bar baz) === ajmitch [n=ajmitch@port166-123.ubs.maxnet.net.nz] has joined #ubuntu-devel [01:29] cjwatson: right, I checked rdepends in this case, I just wondered whether there was some automagic script for it [01:30] pitti: I generally give things at least a few days before removing them to make transitions less painful [01:30] pitti: archive-cruft-check for finding them, but nothing automatic for removing them [01:30] cjwatson: I think this one has been around for at least two weeks [01:30] erm, archive-cruft-check -n too, IIRC [01:30] cjwatson: ah, I see; alright, I'll clean up a little [01:30] I usually do archive-cruft-check -n | sed 's/,//g' to make it easier to paste bits of the output === Sp4rKy [n=maxenced@ubuntu/member/sp4rky] has joined #ubuntu-devel === Gerrath_svolpe [n=Gerrath_@70.89.111.251] has joined #ubuntu-devel [01:32] cjwatson: is there anything we need to do about the ASBA lines? === BenC [n=bcollins@debian/developer/bcollins] has joined #ubuntu-devel === silwol [n=silwol@teacheradsl241.eduhi.at] has joined #ubuntu-devel === pirast [n=martin@p508B26A9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #ubuntu-devel === digitalspaghetti [n=digitals@host217-37-122-77.in-addr.btopenworld.com] has left #ubuntu-devel ["Time] === mbiebl [n=michael@e180066043.adsl.alicedsl.de] has joined #ubuntu-devel === mvo [n=egon@p54A67E49.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel === arre [n=ac@alchemist.openend.se] has joined #ubuntu-devel === ajmitch [n=ajmitch@port166-123.ubs.maxnet.net.nz] has joined #ubuntu-devel [01:47] mvo: is update-manager the only place which prompts you to download and run the dist-upgrade tool in ubuntu? [01:48] Riddell: yes [01:48] Riddell: well, and update-notifier if a CD is inserted [01:48] Riddell: with a update image [01:48] mvo: how do you run dist-upgrade if there's no packages in the stable release to update and pop up the update-notifier icon? === abattoir [n=abattoir@cm109.omega23.maxonline.com.sg] has joined #ubuntu-devel [01:50] Riddell: currently there is only update-manager. it could be made part of update-notifier I think, but that makes matters more complicated [01:52] Riddell: could you please fix kdemultimedia and juk to not b-dep on libtunepimp-bin any more? it's not built any more [01:52] pitti: ok [01:52] mvo: so if there's no stable release updates you can't run the dist-upgrade tool? [01:52] Riddell: (and rebuild kid3 if you like to keep it installable) [01:52] Riddell: thank you [01:52] Riddell: no, just just need to run it manually [01:53] mvo: from the command line? [01:53] Riddell: there is no notification in the tray [01:53] Riddell: from the menu [01:53] ah, right [01:53] thanks mvo [01:53] cjwatson: is it generally safe to remove all the older kernel ABI debs now? [01:54] Riddell: so far this was not a limitation === dholbach_ [n=daniel@i59F74CEC.versanet.de] has joined #ubuntu-devel [01:57] mvo, i'v looked at displayconfig-gtk. My screen is missing from your MonitorsDB [01:58] mvo, where this file come from ? [01:58] pitti: can you nuke the asterisk upload to Feisty before publisher runs, or not? [01:58] Fujitsu: I think I can [01:58] Fujitsu: but it's not in accepted [01:59] kagou: its part of the source right now, displayconfig/ldetect-lst/MonitorsDB [01:59] It was uploaded about 10 minutes ago, I believe. === Hobbsee hasnt gotten an accepted mail for it yet either [01:59] mvo, yes but how did you have generated it ? [01:59] pitti: ignore ASBA, not much you can do about it [02:00] pitti: normally yes, though check that all the bits that need to be rebuilt for a new kernel ABI have been rebuilt [02:00] cjwatson: that is, d-i and ubiquity? [02:00] pitti: not ubiquity; linux-restricted-modules, linux-meta, linux-backports-modules, d-i [02:00] mvo, i'v an belinea.inf from windows driver, i will try to parse it and try to make a diff with your file [02:00] cjwatson: ah, ok; thanks [02:01] kagou: its taken from kde-guidance and they have it from Xconfigrator === freeflying [n=freeflyi@ubuntu/member/freeflying] has joined #ubuntu-devel === Artemis3 [n=artemis3@201.208.169.151] has joined #ubuntu-devel [02:01] kwwii_: just a warning, various artwork packages depend on usplash-dev; this needs to be fixed to libusplash-dev [02:02] mvo, oh ! so may be i should make a diff for Xconfigurator. It's a better choice no ? [02:03] kagou: I'm not sure how active Xconfigrator is actually :) so a diff against the one in displayconfig-gtk is a saver choice for now. it should also go to the kde-guidance people [02:05] cjwatson: how do I check d-i? [02:05] ok mvo thanks === mbiebl [n=michael@e180066043.adsl.alicedsl.de] has joined #ubuntu-devel [02:07] pitti: where does one change that? [02:07] kwwii_: debian/control, 'Build-Depends:' [02:09] pitti: cool, thanks...dholbach will help me on that, I am sure :-) === ogra [n=ogra@ubuntu/member/ogra] has joined #ubuntu-devel [02:22] pitti, hmm, restricted manager doesnt do the right thing for me it seems ... intrestingly lsmod|grep fglrx doesnt show the module anymore now ... [02:22] ogra: --verbose, please [02:22] lsmod --verbose ? [02:22] ogra: you are using 0.4? [02:22] ogra: no, your explanation :) [02:22] ah [02:23] yes, i upgraded the whole system, removed the fglrx driver and reinstalled it with r-m to test the functionallity [02:23] since thne my lsmod [02:23] doesnt show the module anymore [02:24] apart from that [02:24] ogra@edubuntu:~$ glxgears [02:24] Xlib: extension "XFree86-DRI" missing on display ":0.0". [02:24] ogra: xorg.conf has ati or fglrx? [02:24] fglrx [02:24] apparently its also using it ... [02:24] le huh? [02:25] (there are massive font differences between ati and fglrx ... according to the font i'm using the fglrx driver) [02:25] (and according to xorg.conf) [02:25] its just the module i dont see [02:25] that works without the kernel module? [02:25] nor any traces in dmesg [02:25] ogra: ah, wait, that might just be the module for DRI [02:26] right [02:26] still === rtg [n=timg@gn-216-166-171-58.mtwireless.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel [02:26] ogra: can you please ugprade x11-common to 7.2-0ubuntu7? [02:26] ogra: this dexconf fixed DRI handling [02:26] for fglrx [02:26] it just silently fails ... i'd at least expect anything in dmesg [02:26] my system is up to date and rebooted [02:27] ogra: what's your version? might not yet have been built [02:27] pitti: /srv/launchpad.net/ubuntu-archive/ubuntu/dists/feisty/main/installer-i386/current/images/MANIFEST.udebs [02:27] ah, right [02:27] ubuntu7 [02:27] cjwatson: thanks [02:27] ogra: ah, so you hhave the Extensions section with composite disabing? [02:28] in xorg.conf [02:29] there is: [02:29] Section "Extensions" [02:29] Option "Composite" "Enable" [02:29] EndSection [02:29] hmm [02:29] dunno where that comes from though ... it wasnt there before [02:29] ogra: hm, current dexconf should set it to '0' for driver == fglrx === mjr [i=mjrauhal@myntti.helsinki.fi] has joined #ubuntu-devel [02:29] and dexconf doesn't write Extensions otherwise [02:30] ogra: sudo dexconf -o /tmp/conf produces a different one? [02:32] ogra@edubuntu:~$ diff -ruN /etc/X11/xorg.conf /tmp/conf [02:32] --- /etc/X11/xorg.conf 2007-03-09 14:16:05.000000000 +0100 [02:32] +++ /tmp/conf 2007-03-09 14:30:46.000000000 +0100 [02:32] @@ -153,7 +153,3 @@ [02:32] Section "DRI" [02:32] Mode 0666 [02:32] EndSection [02:32] - [02:32] -Section "Extensions" [02:32] - Option "Composite" "Enable" [02:32] -EndSection [02:32] yep [02:32] ogra: that's still wrong; can you double-check that driver is fglrx? [02:33] ogra@edubuntu:~$ grep fglrx /etc/X11/xorg.conf [02:33] Driver "fglrx" [02:34] dpkg -l x11-common | grep -q 0ubuntu7 || echo OUTOFDATE === zul [n=chuck@CPE0006258ec6c1-CM000a73655d0e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has joined #ubuntu-devel [02:36] ogra@edubuntu:~$ dpkg -l x11-common | grep -q 0ubuntu7 || echo OUTOFDATE [02:36] OUTOFDATE [02:36] ogra: if that doesn't do anything, can you please get me a sh -ex output of dexconf? [02:36] aaah [02:36] ogra: as I said, 0ubuntu7 is necessary [02:36] didnt i say i have ubuntu6 only ? [02:37] ah, right [02:37] ubuntu7 [02:37] ogra: just a misunderstanding then, sorry :) [02:37] oh, crap [02:37] ogra: amd64? http://people.ubuntu.com/~pitti/tmp/x11-common_7.2-0ubuntu7_amd64.deb [02:37] i shouldnt have six conversations simultaneously, sorry [02:37] i386 [02:37] ogra: it's not yet on archive [02:38] yep, i can wait, just wanted to notify you that it doesnt work yet for me [02:38] ogra: http://people.ubuntu.com/~pitti/tmp/dexconf, please put into /usr/bin [02:38] but more weird is the module thing [02:38] ogra: oh, it's just the script that's wrong [02:38] ogra: right, that module thing is the bit I'd like to find out [02:39] ogra: if it's not loaded automatically by the fglrx X driver, we might need to stuff it into /etc/modules or so === allee [n=ach@dialin-145-254-252-093.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel [02:39] it should load automatically [02:40] Mhh, why does autobuilder complain about already existing Orig-maintainer field? it's a 0ubuntu1 pkgs. so I thought I have to add it. pkgmaintainermangler: Error: /build/buildd/libkexiv2-0.1.1/debian/libkexiv2-0-dbgsym/DEBIAN/control already contains an Original-Maintainer field; === cr3 [n=marc@pdpc/supporter/bronze/cr3] has joined #ubuntu-devel [02:41] well, usually the Xserver wouldnt start or at least complain if it werent loaded [02:41] https://launchpad.net/+builds/+build/308754 [02:41] allee: it's XSBC-Original-Maintainer [02:41] pitti: that's what I added [02:41] so it *mus* be loaded ... i wnder if the kernel has a bug in listing it somehow [02:41] ogra: in this case it seems to go on without DRI [02:41] hmm [02:41] ogra: sudo modprobe fglrx? [02:41] allee: looking [02:42] $ grep Maintainer libkexiv2-0.1.1/debian/control [02:42] Maintainer: Achim Bohnet [02:42] XSBC-Original-Maintainer: Debian KDE Extras Team [02:42] pitti, done 1000 times today [02:42] its not showing up [02:42] ogra: dmesg? [02:42] ogra: hm, that seems to be outside of r-m's domain then === AlinuxOS [n=vsichi@host35-132-dynamic.1-87-r.retail.telecomitalia.it] has joined #ubuntu-devel [02:43] allee: can you please put that debian/control somewhere? [02:44] tepsipakki, just to repeat myself, nothing in dmesg, no commandline output etc ... no trace of the module, but its in /lib/modules where it belongs [02:44] is it wrong that a package won't install in a chroot? [02:44] allee: nevermind, I'll try it myself here [02:44] mooey: depens on the package, which one is it? [02:44] ogra: ok, strange.. [02:45] mvo, sun-java6-jre from edgy backports, it installs out of a chroot fine but it fails consistantly in a chroot [02:45] mooey: /proc, /sys, and /dev not mounted perhaps? [02:46] mooey: does it ask you about the license? [02:46] mooey: we need the output of the postinst, preferably as sh -ex /var/lib/dpkg/info/.postinst configure [02:46] tepsipakki, [02:46] Mar 9 11:26:57 edubuntu kernel: [663600.348000] [fglrx] total TIM = 0 [02:46] ogra@edubuntu:~$ date [02:46] Fr 9. Mr 14:46:36 CET 2007 [02:46] tepsipakki, it does yea [02:46] pitti, one moment [02:47] tepsipakki, last trace of fglrx is 11:26 ... its now 14:46, i upgraded inbetween and had more than 60 reboots during that time (two fsck's) === Monk-e [n=guido@c529dd229.cable.wanadoo.nl] has joined #ubuntu-devel [02:48] ogra: try reinstalling l-r-m [02:48] oops, mounting /proc fixed it [02:49] ogra: just guessing here.. [02:49] allee: alright, reproduced locally; I'll fix this in pkgmaintainermangler and ask for a rebuild [02:54] allee: fixed pkgbinarymangler uploaded; sorry for the hassle === cr3 [n=marc@pdpc/supporter/bronze/cr3] has joined #ubuntu-devel === finalbeta [n=finalbet@d54C689F7.access.telenet.be] has joined #ubuntu-devel === alex-weej [n=alex@halls-129-31-82-59.hor.ic.ac.uk] has joined #ubuntu-devel [02:55] pitti: okay, thx a lot! === ivoks [n=ivoks@89-172-17-173.adsl.net.t-com.hr] has joined #ubuntu-devel === Keybuk hates gcov [03:05] every time I modify the file, I have to "make clean all" otherwise it complains about "Merge mismatch for summaries" [03:05] tepsipakki, [03:05] ogra@edubuntu:~$ sudo apt-get install --reinstall linux-restricted-modules-2.6.20-9-generic === angasule [n=angasule@190.49.204.229] has joined #ubuntu-devel [03:05] ogra@edubuntu:~$ sudo modprobe fglrx [03:05] ogra@edubuntu:~$ dmesg|grep fgl [03:05] ogra@edubuntu:~$ lsmod|grep fgl [03:05] nothing ... [03:07] weird === mc44 [n=mc44@unaffiliated/mc44] has joined #ubuntu-devel [03:08] ogra: rmmod radeon ? [03:09] ogra@edubuntu:~$ lsmod|grep radeon [03:09] ogra@edubuntu:~$ [03:09] :) [03:09] nothing to rmmod [03:15] elmo: ping I should have xen-2.6.20 this weekend hopefully [03:16] zul: wow - with what version hypervisor? [03:16] ogra: xorg-driver-fglrx [03:16] 3.0.3 === Bubble [i=Bubble@unaffiliated/bubble] has joined #Ubuntu-devel === giskard [n=giskard@213-140-22-74.fastres.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel === MagnusR [n=magru@c83-252-237-96.bredband.comhem.se] has joined #ubuntu-devel [03:17] seb128, what about it ? [03:18] elmo: Im actually building the x86 version right now [03:18] ogra: it looked like you were trying to get fglrx from linux-restricted-modules-2.6.20-9-generic === jono [n=jono@ubuntu/member/jono] has joined #ubuntu-devel [03:18] zul: hmm, how come 3.0.3 and not 3.0.4? [03:18] seb128, yes ... and even everything is installed, the module doesnt show up anywhere [03:18] even if i modprobe ... [03:18] not even in dmesg ... [03:19] no error, no success .... [03:19] elmo: because redhat didnt have a kernel for 3.0.3 at the time and 3.0.4 was giving users grief with timing issues [03:19] ogra: tried to modprobe it from a VT? [03:19] zul: hmm, ok [03:19] 3.0.5 for feisty+1 though [03:20] seb128, good idea ... but same symptoms [03:20] ogra: you should get errors on the command line from a VT [03:20] seb128: but those errors should appear in kern.log/dmesg, too, no? [03:21] seb128, nope, absolute silence [03:21] pitti: right [03:21] seb128, are you using fglrx anywhere atm ? [03:22] ogra: no, but I can try it quickly on my desktop [03:22] i wonder if the l-r-m package is broken [03:22] I tried a week ago and it was working fine [03:22] well, yesterday it was working fine for me :) [03:22] until i upgraded and tried out restricted-manager [03:23] seb128: use r-m :) [03:24] r-m- is cool btw ... kudos pitti [03:24] seb128: and, before that, please install http://people.ubuntu.com/~pitti/tmp/dexconf [03:24] ogra: Keybuk did most of the work so far :) [03:24] the "in use" column doesnt show anything yet ... [03:24] seb128: to /usr/bin/dexconf; it's uploaded, but not yet on the archive, it fixes the composite setting [03:24] ogra: the 'in use' column basically does lsmod|grep module [03:24] ah [03:25] ogra: but for fglrx we probably need some additional magic, like grepping the X.org log or hacky stuff [03:25] ogra: unless you happen to know a command or call how to determine the *currently running* X driver? === EtienneG [n=etienne@modemcable178.77-70-69.static.videotron.ca] has joined #ubuntu-devel === Monk-e [n=guido@c529dd229.cable.wanadoo.nl] has joined #ubuntu-devel [03:27] pitti: does r-m magically makes fglrx work with older cards (Mobility FireGL 9000) too? :-) === NthDegree [n=NthDegre@tapthru/resident/NthDegree] has left #ubuntu-devel ["Leaving"] [03:27] torkel: I don't have an ATI card, I don't know; feedback and bug reports appreciated === bddebian [n=bdefrees@63.81.56.182] has joined #ubuntu-devel [03:27] pitti, usually the lsmod should work as well [03:27] ogra: it does for nvidia at least, it won't start up without the module [03:27] but apparently the fglrx driver can do without DRI [03:28] Heya === pradeep [n=pradeep@59.92.51.204] has joined #ubuntu-devel [03:29] pitti, hmm, right ... [03:29] pitti: ok, what should I do to try fglrx? [03:29] seb128: download above dexconf, stick it into /usr/bin === cypherbios [n=cypher@ubuntu/member/cypherbios] has joined #ubuntu-devel [03:30] seb128: (that will happen once x11-common reaches the archive) [03:30] seb128: and then just start restricted-manager (make sure to have 0.4) and enable the driver [03:30] pitti: they have dropped a lot of older cards in later versions of fglrx (see also #83958) [03:31] torkel: it doesn't magically fix that, no [03:32] tepsipakki: I know, it was an attempt to a joke [03:33] torkel: this is serious :) [03:35] pitti: I just got both a reject and accept e-mail for xdg-utils, do you know what that's about? [03:35] Riddell: yes, sorry; first I rejected it because of the wrong .changes [03:35] Riddell: then I noticed that it was universe in edgy, and accepted it === pochu [n=pochu@ubuntu/member/pochu] has joined #ubuntu-devel [03:36] Riddell: for main I'm stricter about following the policy [03:36] pitti: ok, thanks === Zdra_ [n=zdra@37.218-242-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be] has joined #ubuntu-devel === seb128 [n=seb128@ubuntu/member/seb128] has joined #ubuntu-devel [03:47] pitti: works fine (activating fglrx) [03:47] seb128: yay! [03:48] seb128: you have the composite disabling in xorg.conf, too? [03:48] yep === mbiebl [n=michael@e180066043.adsl.alicedsl.de] has joined #ubuntu-devel [03:48] dunno if that's required though [03:48] I tried without that option and xorg was working fine [03:49] ogra: there is no fglrx kernel module, that's a video driver BTW, what do you try to modprobe? === hawkeye [n=hawkeye@68.216.18.194] has joined #ubuntu-devel [03:51] seb128, ls /lib/modules/2.6.20-9-generic/volatile/ [03:51] do you see fglrx.ko ? [03:51] BenC: can we have fglrx 8.34.8, pretty please? Fixes suspend and resume. [03:51] $ ls /lib/modules/2.6.20-9-generic/volatile/ [03:51] ls: /lib/modules/2.6.20-9-generic/volatile/: No such file or directory [03:51] and oh yeah. xv on amd64 doesn't segfault anymore [03:51] seb128, hmm, intresting [03:52] jdong: Sure [03:52] seb128: Uh, there really is an fglrx module [03:52] mjg59: I'm using fglrx without it [03:52] BenC: thanks! [03:52] ogra@edubuntu:~/devel$ dpkg -S /lib/modules/2.6.20-9-generic/volatile/fglrx.ko [03:52] dpkg: /lib/modules/2.6.20-9-generic/volatile/fglrx.ko nicht gefunden. [03:52] seb128: Can you put xorg.conf somewhere, please? [03:52] hmm, dpkg disagrees with mjg59 [03:52] seb128: Then you aren't using the Xorg fglrx in xorg.conf [03:53] ogra: Yes, that's because it's a generated file [03:53] ah [03:53] seb128: Also Xorg.0.log [03:54] mjg59, same goes for me, i'm using fglrx without th ekernel module ... which doesnt show up anywhere or doesnt show any output to modprobe [03:54] mjg59, BenC: http://people.ubuntu.com/~seb128/xorg.conf [03:54] i start to suspect l-r-m is borked [03:54] http://people.ubuntu.com/~seb128/Xorg.0.log [03:54] the xorg fglrx driver should choke if it can't load the fglrx kernel module [03:54] ogra: dpkg installs fglrx.o in /lib/l-r-m [03:55] BenC: actually it doesn't... [03:55] BenC: it falls back to 2D [03:55] jdong, yes, i see it === jdong eyes nvidia to follow suit.... [03:55] its there, but modprobe remains silent ... === Gman [i=gman@nat/sun/x-c4d24cafa032ba64] has joined #ubuntu-devel [03:55] ogra, run depmod -a [03:55] and try again [03:55] seb128: You have a /dev/dri/foo. That means there's a kernel driver there. === lamont grumbles at openoffice [03:56] Oh, on the other hand, (WW) fglrx(0): Failed to open DRM connection [03:56] mjg59: [03:56] $ sudo lsmod | grep fglrx [03:56] $ [03:56] (WW) fglrx(0): * DRI initialization failed! * [03:56] (WW) fglrx(0): * (maybe driver kernel module missing or bad) * [03:56] seb128, ogra: See what "sudo modprobe fglrx" says === alleeHol [n=ach@dialin-145-254-252-093.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel [03:56] kylem, did that already ... but for you .... [03:56] ogra@edubuntu:~/devel$ sudo depmod -a && sudo modprobe fglrx && lsmod |grep fgl [03:56] Password: [03:56] ogra@edubuntu:~/devel$ [03:57] ogra, special. [03:57] BenC, nothing, not eve in kern.log or anywhere [03:57] $ sudo modprobe fglrx [03:57] FATAL: Error running install command for fglrx [03:57] oh, you have a modprobe.d file ? [03:57] sudo /etc/init.d/linux-restricted-modules start [03:57] there are modprobe.d files [03:57] calls an lrm tool [03:57] ogra@edubuntu:~/devel$ sudo /etc/init.d/linux-restricted-modules start [03:57] sudo: /etc/init.d/linux-restricted-modules: command not found [03:57] BenC: l-r-m-common [03:57] $ sudo /etc/init.d/linux-restricted-modules start [03:57] sudo: /etc/init.d/linux-restricted-modules: command not found [03:57] hmm [03:57] lol [03:58] it's -common [03:58] make no difference [03:58] seb128: s/modules/modules-common/ [03:58] $ sudo /etc/init.d/linux-restricted-modules-common start [03:58] * Preparing restricted drivers... === Monk-e [n=guido@c529dd229.cable.wanadoo.nl] has joined #ubuntu-devel [03:58] $ sudo modprobe fglrx [03:58] FATAL: Error running install command for fglrx [03:58] seb128: have cat xorg.conf | grep fglrx? [03:58] ogra@edubuntu:~/devel$ sudo /etc/init.d/linux-restricted-modules-common start [03:58] * Preparing restricted drivers... [ OK ] [03:58] ogra@edubuntu:~/devel$ [03:58] jdong: xorg.conf is fine [03:58] seb128: Do you even have lrm-commone installed? [03:58] mjg59: mmm ok [03:58] they both seem to [03:59] ogra@edubuntu:~/devel$ sudo modprobe fglrx && lsmod|grep fgl [03:59] ogra@edubuntu:~/devel$ [03:59] or lrm for that matter [03:59] it's the post-install command that apparently borks out [03:59] that big ugly sed thing :) [03:59] ii linux-restricted-modules 2.6.20.2-9.8 Non-free Linux 2.6.20 modules helper script [03:59] BenC, until 11:26 am today i had fglrx :) it vanished with an upgrade ... (16:00 now here) [04:00] <_ion> '/sbin/modinfo -F alias nvidia' lists a bunch of 'pci:' aliases, but '/sbin/modinfo -F alias fglrx' lists none. Could that be related to the problem at all? [04:00] BenC, i really think something in l-r-m is broken === j1mc [n=jcampbel@157.199.22.99] has joined #ubuntu-devel === seb128 installs linux-restricted-modules-2.6.20-9-generic [04:00] sudo apt-get install linux-generic [04:00] make sure you have all the meta packages installed === glatzor [n=sebi@p549664ED.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel [04:01] ogra@edubuntu:~/devel$ LANG=C sudo apt-get install linux-generic [04:01] Reading package lists... Done [04:01] Building dependency tree [04:01] Reading state information... Done [04:01] linux-generic is already the newest version. [04:01] BenC: I don't have linux-restricted-modules-2.6.20-9-generic installed [04:01] nope ... [04:01] installing ... [04:01] seb128: installing linux-generic should pull it in [04:01] <_ion> Even easier: apt-get install linux :-) It depends on linux-generic. [04:01] BenC: yeah, it does [04:01] linux-generic linux-image-generic linux-restricted-modules-2.6.20-9-generic linux-restricted-modules-generic [04:02] seb128: Ok, so yours we can chalk up to a meta-package desync local to your system [04:02] ogra: I'm concerned about why yours isn't working. What ATI chip do you have? [04:03] radeon mobility r200m [04:03] 01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc ATI Radeon XPRESS 200M 5955 (PCIE) [04:03] to be precise [04:04] xpress 200m is notorious [04:04] fglrx worked with it at some point ... [04:04] If by "notorious" you mean "shit", then yes [04:04] the DRI developers don't know how to initialize memory for it, dunno about fglrx [04:04] But that's not really the point [04:04] I wonder if the newer driver doesn't support it anymore [04:05] mjg59, yes I do mean "shit", but true, beside the point. I was just setting up my further comment. [04:05] anyone know how to get to the latest ATI beta drivers? [04:05] i havent tried 3D stuff for a while, but it worked before todays upgrade ... which must have been the ats 2.6.20-9 package [04:05] *last [04:05] normal support link goes to 8.32.5 [04:05] The 200M is supposed to be supported [04:05] yes [04:06] the silence of modprobe is very suspicious /me thinks [04:06] xpress 200m works nowaays [04:06] BenC: [04:06] the feed shows 8.34.8, but doesn't link to the download [04:06] $ sudo modprobe fglrx [04:06] FATAL: Error running install command for fglrx [04:06] I've helped many people get fglrx+xgl to dthat [04:06] ogra: What does modinfo fglrx give you? [04:06] after package install and sudo /etc/init.d/linux-restricted-modules-common start [04:06] BenC: go to ATI.com, download Linux drivers for the highest radeon model [04:06] BenC: their stupid release notes don't link to drivers [04:06] ogra@edubuntu:~/devel$ modinfo fglrx [04:06] filename: /lib/modules/2.6.20-9-generic/volatile/fglrx.ko [04:06] depends: agpgart [04:06] vermagic: 2.6.20-9-generic SMP mod_unload 586 [04:06] license: Proprietary. (C) 2002 - ATI Technologies, Starnberg, GERMANY [04:06] ... [04:06] seems fine [04:06] kernel: [19204.817528] [fglrx] Maximum main memory to use for locked dma buffers: 929 MBytes. [04:07] kernel: [19204.817731] [fglrx:firegl_init_module] *ERROR* firegl_stub_register failed [04:07] seb128: cool, I saw that at dell [04:07] Seb loses. [04:07] :) [04:07] err, on a dell [04:07] seb128: are you running amd64 or something? [04:07] seb128, thats kern.log ? [04:07] jdong: i386 distro on an amd64 box [04:07] ogra: yep [04:07] ogra: ls /sys/module/*fgl* ? [04:07] that shouldn't do it then :( [04:08] ogra: my computer has no brand ;) [04:08] ups [04:08] jdong: Drivers shouldn't bail out with cryptic errors on load? Shock! [04:08] ogra@edubuntu:~/devel$ ls /sys/module/*fgl* [04:08] ls: /sys/module/*fgl*: No such file or directory === tkjacobsen [n=tkjacobs@105.18.235.85.dk-boa.res.dyn.perspektivbredband.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel [04:08] mjg59, ^^ [04:08] BenC: my computer has no brand ;) [04:08] seb128: poor thing, you need to help it find an identify :) [04:08] ogra@edubuntu:~/devel$ grep fglrx /var/log/kern.log [04:08] ... [04:08] Mar 9 11:26:57 edubuntu kernel: [663600.348000] [fglrx] max single Inv = 0 [04:08] Mar 9 11:26:57 edubuntu kernel: [663600.348000] [fglrx] total TIM = 0 [04:08] ogra@edubuntu:~/devel$ date [04:08] Fr 9. Mr 16:08:33 CET 2007 [04:08] ogra: In that case, the modprobe.d fragment is under the impression that you don't need fglrx, and so is refusing to load it [04:08] BenC: :) [04:08] mjg59: usplash shouldn't destory all my vt's? *shock* (kidding!) [04:09] mjg59, hmm ... l-r-m common intalls these snippets ? [04:09] Yes [04:09] the modprobe.d just calls a script in lrm-common [04:10] install fglrx /sbin/lrm-video fglrx $CMDLINE_OPTS [04:10] ogra@edubuntu:~/devel$ LANG=C dpkg -S /etc/modprobe.d/fglrx [04:10] dpkg: /etc/modprobe.d/fglrx not found. [04:10] intresting [04:10] doko_: you around? [04:10] so you can actually do: sudo lrm-video fglrx [04:10] doko_: how come oopenoffice.org says it built successfully on ia64, but didn't deliver openoffice.org-writer? [04:10] ogra: /etc/modprobe.d/lrm-video [04:11] right [04:11] i wonder if that fglrx file pverrides it [04:11] *overrides [04:11] and where that comes from ... i surely didnt create it [04:11] ogra: They're shell scripts. It's easy to have a play. === shackan [n=shackan@85-18-14-13.fastres.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel [04:12] ogra: $ dpkg -S /etc/modprobe.d/lrm-video linux-restricted-modules-common: /etc/modprobe.d/lrm-video [04:12] missing \n, but it's lrm-common [04:12] BenC, i meant /etc/modprobe.d/fglrx in my dir ... [04:12] ogra: Oh, that sounds like just you :) [04:13] i didnt create it [04:13] the lrm-video has been in use since I started in ubuntu, IIRC [04:13] and fglrx worked until last upgrade ... [04:13] ogra: Try removing that file [04:13] see if things work after that [04:14] lamont: libmythes-dev only; you didn't port ooo, did you? [04:14] ogra@edubuntu:~/devel$ sudo mv /etc/modprobe.d/fglrx . [04:14] ogra@edubuntu:~/devel$ sudo modprobe fglrx [04:14] ogra@edubuntu:~/devel$ lsmod |grep fgl [04:14] nope === HiddenWolf [n=HiddenWo@136.225.dynamic.phpg.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel [04:14] ogra: check /var/log/dpkg.log for changes after you had it working [04:14] lamont: but I can make it ftbfs for you ;-p === phanatic [n=phanatic@ubuntu/member/phanatic] has joined #ubuntu-devel [04:15] ankpelle:~# dpkg -S /etc/modprobe.d/fglrx [04:15] xorg-driver-fglrx: /etc/modprobe.d/fglrx [04:17] interesting that there's an override on that [04:17] torkel: What does the file contain? [04:17] install fglrx if cat /etc/X11/xorg.conf 2>/dev/null | sed -n -e '/^[ \\t] *section[ \\t] *"device"/I,/^[ \\t] *endsection/I{/^[ \\t] *driver[ \\t] */I{s/^[ \\t] *driver[ \\t] *"*//I;s/"*[ \\t] *$//;p}}' | grep -q -w fglrx; then modprobe --ignore-install -Qb $CMDLINE_OPTS fglrx; else echo "Not loading fglrx module; not used in /etc/X11/xorg.conf" 1>&2; fi [04:17] only one line [04:18] that is so ugly [04:18] yeah [04:18] generally, it's the xorg driver that loads it, so I suspect that snippet is overkill [04:19] except to save people who manually add fglrx to /etc/modules or something [04:19] I wonder if that's from ati's driver...maybe I could just leave it out [04:20] The /sbin/lrm-video script has a similar snippet [04:20] so it is overkill [04:21] cat /etc/X11/xorg.conf | sed -n -e '/^[ \t] *section[ \\t] *"device"/I,/^[ \t] *endsection/I{/^[ \t] *driver[ \t] */I{s/^[ \t] *driver[ \t] *"*//I;s/"*[ \t] *$//;p}}' [04:21] ogra: What does that command output for you? [04:22] AHA !!!! [04:22] ogra@edubuntu:~/devel$ sudo insmod /lib/modules/2.6.20-9-generic/volatile/fglrx.ko [04:22] ogra@edubuntu:~/devel$ lsmod |grep fglrx [04:22] fglrx 527192 0 [04:22] agpgart 33480 2 fglrx,ati_agp [04:22] ogra@edubuntu:~/devel$ sudo modprobe fglrx [04:22] ogra@edubuntu:~/devel$ lsmod |grep fglrx [04:22] ogra@edubuntu:~/devel$ [04:22] oh. [04:23] modprobe is broken ! [04:23] BenC: no, the xorg driver makes no attempt at loadking fglrx.ko.... [04:23] (that's nvidia you're thinking of) [04:23] most people do put fglrx in /etc/modules [04:23] ogra: Most likely the lrm-video and fglrx modprobe.d snippet isn't liking your xorg.conf...what does that cat/sed command above shows for you? === tkjacobsen [n=tkjacobs@105.18.235.85.dk-boa.res.dyn.perspektivbredband.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel === delire [n=delire@lawn-128-61-118-174.lawn.gatech.edu] has joined #ubuntu-devel [04:24] ogra@edubuntu:~/devel$ cat /etc/X11/xorg.conf 2>/dev/null | sed -n -e '/^[ \\t] *section[ \\t] *"device"/I,/^[ \\t] *endsection/I{/^[ \\t] *driver[ \\t] */I{s/^[ \\t] *driver[ \\t] *"*//I;s/"*[ \\t] *$//;p}}' | grep -q -w fglrx [04:24] ogra@edubuntu:~/devel$ [04:24] jdong: Ah, I thought fglrx tried to load it like nvidia [04:24] niente .... [04:24] ogra: Minus the final grep, what does it actually output [04:24] nothing either [04:24] jdong: btw, sorry for so many needsinfo sync bugs; the backports process was more or less dead for quite a while, but it's settled now [04:25] ogra: And use the one I pasted, since that's the one lrm-video uses [04:25] pitti: no sweat, thanks archive team for all the backports processed :) [04:25] ogra: Uploading your xorg.conf somewhere would be nice too [04:25] BenC, fglrx [04:25] i don't think you can have the kernel agp drivers loaded along with fglrx... i think you need to blacklist them... [04:25] ogra: So the fglrx modprobe.d file is broken === hunger [n=tobias@pd95b0676.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #ubuntu-devel [04:26] BenC, but removing it doesnt fix it [04:26] kylem: no, that's fine.... [04:26] I've had a few bad runins with the insmod sedjob thingie [04:26] BenC, http://people.ubuntu.com/~ogra/xorg.conf [04:26] its freshly generated [04:26] where it would not believe at times fglrx is needed [04:26] two hours ago or so [04:27] BenC, what bothers me is that insmod works but modprobe doesnt === giskard [n=giskard@213-140-22-74.fastres.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel [04:28] doko_: ooffice was using ia32-libs-openoffice.org on ia64 and amd64 - did that change? [04:30] lamont: we don't have the ia32 package anymore (builds native on amd64), already in edgy [04:30] figures === Monk-e [n=guido@c529dd229.cable.wanadoo.nl] has joined #ubuntu-devel === lamont wonders if maybe lying to oo.o and pretending it's amd64 will do the trick... how much asm is there? === roico is now known as roico_not_here [04:33] ogra: modprobe --ignore-install -Qb fglrx [04:33] oops === ogra [n=ogra@ubuntu/member/ogra] has joined #ubuntu-devel [04:34] ogra: modprobe --ignore-install -Qb fglrx [04:34] that'll probably work [04:34] wait ... [04:34] ogra@edubuntu:~$ modprobe --ignore-install -Qb fglrx [04:34] ogra@edubuntu:~$ lsmod |grep fgl [04:34] nop [04:35] ogra: Run depmod -a === lamont ponders where in the cube to stick his zx2000 for actual use. [04:35] did that several times ... but will do again [04:35] lamont, duct taped to the ceiling. [04:35] ogra: Does "modinfo fglrx" show it? [04:35] ogra@edubuntu:~$ sudo depmod -a [04:35] ogra@edubuntu:~$ modprobe --ignore-install -Qb fglrx [04:35] ogra@edubuntu:~$ lsmod |grep fgl [04:35] ogra@edubuntu:~$ [04:35] kylem: iz t-bar ceiling --> won't hold it [04:36] ogra@edubuntu:~$ modinfo fglrx [04:36] filename: /lib/modules/2.6.20-9-generic/volatile/fglrx.ko [04:36] depends: agpgart [04:36] ... [04:36] all fine [04:36] ogra: does "rgrep fglrx /etc/modprobe.d/" show any other references? [04:37] ogra: and did you remove /etc/modprobe.d/fglrx? [04:37] /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-restricted:blacklist fglrx [04:37] ugh [04:37] feh [04:37] where does that come from ? [04:37] lol [04:37] I don't have that file [04:37] ogra: can I buy you a legal nonalcoholic beverage next time I see you? [04:37] :D [04:38] ogra: Did you get OSS anal one day and add that file? :) [04:38] BenC, me neither [04:38] ogra@edubuntu:~$ LANG=C dpkg -S /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-restricted [04:38] dpkg: /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-restricted not found. [04:38] ogra@edubuntu:~$ cat /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-restricted [04:38] # This file is used to disable restricted drivers [04:38] blacklist fglrx [04:38] sudo apt-get --purge remove rms [04:38] ogra@edubuntu:~$ ls -lh /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-restricted [04:38] -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 66 2007-03-09 12:53 /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-restricted [04:38] BenC: RMS found his ssh key.... [04:39] and its brandnew [04:39] pitti, ??? ^^^ [04:39] does r-m create it ? [04:39] oh wtf BenC you already made an RMS joke :D [04:39] ogra: I just did a dist-upgrade and don't have that file [04:39] and I have lrm+lrm-common installed [04:39] brb [04:39] BenC, did you use restricted-manager to switch it on and off ? [04:40] ogra: you fired up r-m and disabled it then [04:40] restricted-manager --enable fglrx [04:41] Keybuk, i disabled and enabled it through the gui as that was my testcase for pitti :) [04:41] you didn't enable it hard enough [04:41] but i cant enable it again ... [04:41] heh [04:41] what does that command say? [04:41] "FreeSoftwareError: RMS is going to murder you" [04:41] Must be run as root :P [04:41] jdong: I did originally name it "Restricted Module Setup" [04:42] Keybuk, "fglrx is already enabled" [04:42] ogra: I assume you know what to do next [04:42] :) [04:42] Keybuk: HA! that's priceless [04:42] Keybuk, but still [04:42] ogra@edubuntu:~$ cat /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-restricted [04:42] # This file is used to disable restricted drivers [04:42] blacklist fglrx [04:42] can anyone reproduce? [04:42] tfheen: could you please throw a look at bug 85403? both elmo and seb128 think that's a good idea [04:42] Malone bug 85403 in vnc4 "ship xvnc4viewer by default (in main)" [Undecided,Unconfirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/85403 [04:42] ogra: you must have disabled it with an earlier version of restricted-manager [04:43] (not biologically, that bug) [04:43] just remove that file [04:43] (pitti has added an fglrx module handler to it) [04:43] Keybuk, indeed, that might be [04:44] ogra: ah, it was still blacklisted? now that explains a lot :) [04:44] r-m uses the blacklist to enable/disable modules when there's no specific handler for it [04:44] yeah [04:44] jdong: hi [04:44] works fine now :) [04:44] but when there's a specific handler, it doesn't use the blacklist since the specific handler overrides the enable() function :p [04:44] ogra: however, this transition should be handled more cleanly; can you please file a bug for me to remember? [04:44] will do [04:44] ogra: in this case the enabling/disabling should *also* handle module blacklisting [04:44] jdong:is somebody else authorized to approve backport requests? [04:44] ogra: thanks a lot! [04:45] tanks for the help :) [04:45] *thanks as well :) [04:47] ogra: No, haven't touched that. Maybe that's it === beuno [n=martin@68-155-114-200.fibertel.com.ar] has joined #ubuntu-devel [04:48] seb128: imbrandon, slomo_, anyone on the Backports team I fully trust to approve them [04:48] seb128: ubuntu-backporters team, or at least that's who I've been trusting [04:48] BenC, yes, its the r-m 0.3 version i used ... [04:50] jdong: ok, because I did a round of edgy backports approval yesterday, I was not sure who else than you is authorized to do that, do you use a special status like "In Progress" when the backport has been accepted? [04:50] random people do +1 on bugs [04:50] seb128: In Progress == accepted [04:50] it's not clear if they are accepted or not though [04:50] cjwatson: ok [04:50] seb128: +1 people are my testing drones... only In Progress counts :) [04:51] jdong: ok [04:51] well, off to lecture [04:51] will see everyone later :) === jono [n=jono@ubuntu/member/jono] has joined #ubuntu-devel [04:52] pitti: did you process the backports today? [04:52] seb128: yes, all of them [04:53] pitti: utch :/ [04:53] seb128: well, except those which aren't confirmed, of course [04:53] pitti: you did backport a lot of things not accepted I think [04:53] pitti: "confirmed" is not to backport [04:53] "in progress" are those to backport [04:53] seb128: right [04:53] seb128: I meant 'I looked at all the backport bugs, did the ones with jdong's approval, and triaged the rest' [04:54] seb128: I set back some to needsinfo which were out of sync, for example [04:54] and which had been inprogress before [04:54] weird, there was like backports 30 bugs open yesterday and ubuntu-archive list of subscribed bug is 18 bugs today [04:54] did you close all the "SRU should be consider first"? [04:54] there was a bunch of them [04:54] seb128: right, I did my best to clean up u-archive/+subedbugs [04:54] ah ok [04:54] seb128: I unsub'ed u-archive from the SRUs [04:55] seb128: since they cannot be fixed immediately, and ubuntu-sru/+subscribedbugs is much better for this [04:55] they just clutter up the archive team bug list [04:55] pitti: I don't do sru, I just looked at backport yesterday [04:55] tfheen: can you please give-back libkexiv2? fixed pkgbinarymangler is in the archive now [04:55] I'm just surprised that you manager to reduce the backport list so much [04:56] managed [04:56] I had the impression than many of them were waiting on approval yesterday [04:56] seb128: *shrug*, there were some approved dapper-backports requests where you only did the edgy one [04:56] seb128: feel free to check the list, but I'm fairly sure I checked them correctly [04:57] I did backports for the first time yesterday, just wondering if I'm too cautious [04:57] seb128: maybe the confusion comes from the bug status [04:57] not questioning what you did [04:57] seb128: it's likely that there were approved bugs with 'confirmed' status [04:57] seb128: I looked at the actual bug comments and 'approved' mails from jdong [04:58] pitti: ok, in fact I got confused because you changed to Needs Info the things that need to be confirmed [04:59] that's all fine ;) === glatzor [n=sebi@p549664ED.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel === pitti hugs seb128, great === seb128 hugs pitti back === pitti is happy that fglrx now works for both seb128 and ogra, thanks for testing [05:01] np [05:01] :) [05:01] I'll be back to ati to next xorg restart though :p [05:01] I prefer composite to 3d ;) [05:01] i whish comosite would work for me [05:01] *composite [05:02] seb128: right, if the free driver works, so much the better [05:02] yeah [05:02] pitti: I'm confused by https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive/+subscribedbugs now :/ === ogra wants sockets for graphics boards in laptops [05:02] seb128: however, compiz gets better - I managed to work with it yesterday for a whole 30 minutes! that's absolute record so far [05:02] pitti: it used to list all the edgy-backport tasks, no? [05:03] seb128: right [05:03] seb128: it still lists some which are needsinfo and such [05:03] k, that's why the list changed so much [05:03] there is still lot of bugs open on https://bugs.launchpad.net/edgy-backports/+bugs [05:03] ubuntu-archive is just not subscribed to them [05:04] oh, indeed [05:04] I never looked at the edgy-backports/+bugs page [05:04] yesterday there was like 40 bugs I did close [05:04] I didn't get how you manager to close them [05:04] oh [05:04] well, lp must have changed [05:04] or teams [05:04] there are a bunch of backport bugs assigned to me [05:04] because yesterday they were listed on ubuntu-archive subscribed [05:04] seb128: no, probably those bugs have never been subscribed to u-archive [05:04] could someone redirect them somewhere appropriate? they may also be entirely obsolete [05:04] they were yesterday [05:04] seb128: are you sure? [05:05] hum, no [05:05] elmo: those all belong to {dapper,edgy}-backports product? if so, we'll get them [05:06] pitti: k, maybe I switching from ubuntu-archive/+bugs to edgy-backport/+bugs yesterday while working [05:06] pitti: breezy-backports actually :) [05:06] switched [05:06] elmo: *cough* not worth bothering about those, I guess [05:06] seb128: I'll walk though those lists again [05:07] pitti: I did read almost all the edgy backports bugs yesterday, not real need to bother with them [05:07] feel free to do the dapper ones if you want ;) [05:07] alright [05:08] The Ubuntu list servers are going down for 30 mins or so for a hardware upgrade. [05:08] pitti: good work on the ubuntu-archive list of bugs BTW, nice to have it so short again ;) === seb128 hugs pitti [05:11] seb128: then let's formalize this by unsub'ing u-archive from the rest of the backports bugs and I'll change the wiki page [05:11] pitti: ok, thank you === vciaglia [n=vciaglia@87.17.1.141] has joined #ubuntu-devel [05:11] only backports that need to processed should have ubuntu-archive subscribed === sacater [n=sacater@host81-152-158-36.range81-152.btcentralplus.com] has joined #ubuntu-devel [05:12] seb128: why, filtering the products for confirmed+inprogress does this more reliably, right? [05:13] alright, that works as well [05:13] seb128: but as you wish, I can leave them subscribed [05:13] "in progress" only [05:13] but personally I prefer canned searches over manual subscribing [05:13] jdong said those are the ones approved [05:13] ok, if we can rely on that, sure [05:19] seb128: yay, https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive/+subscribedbugs is even shorter now :) === seb128 hugs the great pitti [05:20] awesome work ;) === gismo [n=stef@89.28.145.214] has joined #ubuntu-devel [05:39] keescook: I've prepared debdiffs for gpgme1.0 at bug #90864 [05:39] Malone bug 90864 in gpgme1.0 "Debdiff to fix CVE-2007-1263 in feisty and edgy" [Undecided,Unconfirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/90864 [05:40] geser: you rule! thank you! :) === Magnus1 [n=magru@c83-252-237-96.bredband.comhem.se] has joined #ubuntu-devel [05:42] keescook: thanks for your patch in debbugs! did you see the additional hunk A Menucc posted? === pirast [n=martin@p508B26A9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #ubuntu-devel [05:43] siretart: I just started checking email. what's the url? [05:45] keescook: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=414072;msg=12 [05:45] Debian bug 414072 in xine-lib "Bug#414072: CVE-2007-1246: DMO decoder heap allocation overflow" [Grave,Closed] === delire [n=delire@lawn-128-61-118-174.lawn.gatech.edu] has joined #ubuntu-devel [05:46] siretart: cool, thanks. [05:58] hey all, per the instructions near the bottom of this page (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/ReportingResults), shouldn't new "bugs" be created for each nightly release for ISO testers to report their results (see here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-iso-tests/+bugs)? it looks like we're a bit behind. === LaserJock [n=mantha@ubuntu/member/laserjock] has joined #ubuntu-devel [05:59] should individual testers just create a new "reporting bug" if one doesn't already exist for their most recent nightly image? === ivoks [n=ivoks@39-213.dsl.iskon.hr] has joined #ubuntu-devel [06:07] KMAP=$(echo "get xserver-xorg/config/inputdevice/keyboard/layout"|debconf-communicate 2>/dev/null|cut -d ' ' -f 2) [06:07] j1mc: no, individual testers shouldn't create bugs, just comment existing ones [06:07] j1mc: looking the wiki [06:08] ^^ does anybody have a hint how to make that return noting if the debconf value doesnt exist ? [06:08] *nothing [06:08] seems denconf communicate just reached the path through if xserver-xorg/config/inputdevice/keyboard/layout isnt existing [06:08] *reaches [06:10] pochu: are the last set of images created really from 20070302, or are people just behind in creating new reporting bugs? === silwol [n=silwol@85-124-254-11.wels.xdsl-line.inode.at] has joined #ubuntu-devel [06:11] j1mc: the last images are of today, [06:12] j1mc: people shouldn't create them === pradeep [n=pradeep@59.92.56.64] has joined #ubuntu-devel === jdong [n=jdong@ubuntu/member/jdong] has joined #ubuntu-devel [06:14] pochu: sorry for any confusion, but ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-iso-tests/+bugs ) only shows xubuntu builds as of March 1st. [06:14] of course, you can download nightlies that are more recent than that. [06:15] j1mc: the reports are for testing the release candidates (herd candidates, beta candidates...) but not for testing daily builds [06:15] j1mc: so all the reports are all [06:16] tfheen: am I right? (not sure hehe) [06:16] j1mc: the reports are done by a script, so you shouldn't create new reports [06:17] pochu: thanks . . . do you know where should testers be reporting results off of nightly images? [06:18] j1mc: I think there is no need to report results of daily builds, ATM [06:18] j1mc: just reports bug against the right packages :) === mbiebl [n=michael@e180066043.adsl.alicedsl.de] has joined #ubuntu-devel [06:19] is there a #ubuntu-games-devel channel? or anyone who cares about games on ubuntu? the current status isn't very good [06:19] pochu: thanks. :) i'll relay this to the xubuntu testers. i take it that nightly tests will pick back up as we approach the first beta? [06:19] j1mc: but we are going to test the images for the beta this weekend, so we should create reports for that [06:19] :-) [06:20] j1mc: sure :) [06:20] pochu: thanks . . . talk to you later. [06:20] j1mc: when you want :) [06:21] j1mc: and thanks for you work ;) [06:21] pochu: you're welcome! [06:24] ha. Ubuntu. gaming [06:24] the only game is let's see if Xgl can break even more. === j1mc [n=jcampbel@157.199.22.99] has left #ubuntu-devel [] [06:25] jdong: are some people still using Xgl? [06:25] anyone? I was thinking ubuntu could include an updated OpenAL (the current version is years old) as well as some other libraries that are good for games [06:25] seb128: quite a few, I hear a few mentions of xgl on #beryl every now and then [06:25] seb128: fglrx people have no choice [06:25] seb128: and nvidia-legacy people [06:25] jdong: why? [06:25] seb128: no AIGLX [06:26] ? [06:26] no composite you mean? [06:26] the drivers do not support AIGLX [06:26] no composite, too [06:26] glx_ext_texture_from_pixmap [06:26] The drivers do support aiglx [06:26] They don't support glx_ext_texture_from_pixmap === mc44 [n=mc44@unaffiliated/mc44] has joined #ubuntu-devel [06:26] seb128: and for most desktop effects, Xgl is actually faster/smoother. Many nvidia MX440 users I know choose Xgl [06:27] because effects are markedly smoother. [06:27] especially full screen video textures [06:27] It's still not trivially supportable [06:27] of course, MX440 and the like should die as soon as possible... [06:27] mjg59: at least it should not be totally borken in feisty [06:27] :( [06:27] mjg59: please? [06:28] fglrx and aiglx work fine on my desktop [06:28] I'm on my knees and begging about this [06:28] seb128: WHAT? === wasabi_ [n=jhaltom@ubuntu/member/wasabi] has joined #ubuntu-devel [06:28] there is no composite, out of that it works fine [06:28] seb128: how do you have AIGLX??? [06:28] install feisty [06:28] seb128: I am on feisty. [06:28] jdong: aiglx isn't difficult. It's just not what you want. [06:28] use restricted-manager and click ati [06:29] seb128: you cannot start beryl/compiz [06:29] no, there is no composite [06:29] seb128: no glx_ext_texture_from_pixmap [06:29] that's what matters at the end of the day. [06:29] I'll patch compiz with the no-tfp patch [06:29] jdong: AIGLX does not mean what you think it means [06:29] mjg59: hmm ok [06:29] seb128: cool, analogous to Beryl's "Copy" mode? [06:29] seb128: Is that useful without composite? [06:29] seb128: it still needs Composite, no? [06:30] mjg59: it makes it work when glx_ext_texture_from_pixmap is not available [06:30] If not, I wouldn't bother [06:30] seb128: that still requires composite to work right? [06:30] seb128: glx_ext_texture_from_pixmap is available on all the systems we support [06:30] jdong: I don't know much about beryl [06:30] mjg59: it's not with fglrx [06:30] seb128: But fglrx doesn't support composite when 3D is enabled [06:30] seb128: and compiz works on fglrx with that patch? [06:30] So you can't run compiz [06:30] hum [06:30] seb128: DRI acceleration and Composite are mutually exclusive in fglrx [06:31] turn on one and the other is forced off [06:31] Nicolas who works on compiz and sent me the patch told me it makes compiz work with fglrx [06:31] I need to try [06:31] seb128: hum, I'd love to hear if that works === Skorgu|Work [n=patrick@pool-71-247-105-9.nycmny.east.verizon.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel [06:34] Is this the right place to ask a packaging question (about my own package, not an ubuntu one)? [06:34] nope.... [06:34] -motu at best [06:34] thanks === Skorgu|Work [n=patrick@pool-71-247-105-9.nycmny.east.verizon.net] has left #ubuntu-devel [] === tsmithe` [n=tsmithe@82-70-109-22.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-devel === mbiebl [n=michael@e180066043.adsl.alicedsl.de] has joined #ubuntu-devel === sistpoty [n=sistpoty@ubuntu/member/sistpoty] has joined #ubuntu-devel === mvo [n=egon@p54A67E49.dip.t-dialin.net] has left #ubuntu-devel ["Ex-Chat"] === mvo [n=egon@p54A67E49.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel === mbiebl [n=michael@e180066043.adsl.alicedsl.de] has joined #ubuntu-devel === jcole [i=jcole@nat/hp/x-7d26d84cf2b3756d] has joined #ubuntu-devel === angasule [n=angasule@190.49.204.229] has joined #ubuntu-devel [06:47] geser: have you got any time to snag gnupg2's 2.0.3 release? I need to backport that to edgy too, but it seems they only released patches for gpg and gpgme. I suspect it'll be close to the gpg patch. [06:49] keescook: I've packages ready for 2.0.3 but not a separated patch for it [06:50] the diff between 2.0.2 and 2.0.3 isn't that large [06:51] geser: cool, I can do the edgy patch. do you have a UVFe open for 2.0.3? That should be pretty easy to get approved, and then I can upload it for you. === j1mc [n=jcampbel@157.199.22.99] has joined #ubuntu-devel === j1mc [n=jcampbel@157.199.22.99] has left #ubuntu-devel [] [06:52] I've send a mail to tfheen and cjwatson but not opened a bug for it [06:52] keescook: but you can find it on http://members.ping.de/~mb/gnupg2/ === _TomB [n=tomb@host217-44-151-84.range217-44.btcentralplus.com] has joined #ubuntu-devel [06:52] geser: great, thanks! === pax [n=pax@pdpc/supporter/student/pax] has joined #ubuntu-devel [06:55] tfheen: did ubuntu-archive come to a decision about removing binary packages of unsupportable software yet? [06:57] wait, before Xgl goes, can I make a eulogy? [06:58] meh I still need to write one up === khermans__ [i=administ@nat/cisco/x-db0dbbb7d5add191] has joined #ubuntu-devel === jdong_ [n=jdong@W20-575-10.MIT.EDU] has joined #ubuntu-devel === mmax [n=mmax@AAmiens-152-1-90-30.w90-34.abo.wanadoo.fr] has joined #ubuntu-devel === _stefan_ [n=sistpoty@DSL01.83.171.182.3.ip-pool.NEFkom.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel === _stefan_ is now known as sistpoty === pax [n=pax@pdpc/supporter/student/pax] has joined #ubuntu-devel [07:16] ogra: the first bit of the output from debconf-communicate will be something other than "0" if the question doesn't exist [07:17] yeah [07:17] i got it fixed [07:17] ogra: is there a reason you can't just . /usr/share/debconf/confmodule and do if db_get xserver-xorg/config/inputdevice/keyboard/layout; then KMAP="$RET"; else KMAP=; fi ? [07:17] (there might be such a reason - just wondering) [07:17] no, there is none ... [07:18] i was just lazy copying the other preseed code we use in the initscript for setting preseed values [07:19] hmm, I don't think it's a good idea for an initscript to load debconf [07:19] is this the place to discuss versions of included libraries and general game support or not? [07:19] better to do that in a maintainer script [07:20] well, the ltsp-client initscript needs to preseed the X values if they are set in lts.conf ... [07:20] we use it like that since the first release [07:21] the current code i'm working on is rather to preseed the chroot values from the server during chroot build ... [07:21] noooooooo my ghost died [07:21] your code looks a lot better than mine, so i'll use it ;) [07:21] ok === holycow [n=hello@mail.wjsgroup.com] has joined #ubuntu-devel [07:22] hi, I'm running edgy with edgy-backports actived and there is a problem with a package from backports, is it the good place to speak about that and to expose the problem? [07:23] mmax: from what repository? [07:24] http://archive.ubuntu.com edgy-updates/main [07:24] mmax, that's not backports, that's edgy-updates [07:25] but yeah, this can be a good place to discuss issues [07:25] sorry [07:25] http://archive.ubuntu.com edgy-backports/main [07:25] ok, that's me. [07:25] past/copy error ;) [07:25] what's up? [07:26] I have done an upgrade and libgphoto2-2 version 2.3 has been installed from backports [07:26] there is a problem (not critical) with the udev rules generated by the postinstall script of this package [07:26] the rules are created for udev >=0.98 but edgy provides 0.93, so at booting I saw lots of these two error messages repeated many times: [07:26] add_to_rules: unknown key 'ATTRS{idVendor}' [07:27] add_to_rules: unknown key 'ATTRS{idProduct}' [07:27] lovely... [07:27] so I manually replace ATTRS by former SYSFS in this rules file [07:27] that wasn't an issue when the backport was initially approved === jdong_ stifles some grumbles [07:27] the line in the post-install script is: [07:27] but yeah, I will after class prepare an upload that fixes the issue [07:28] cjwatson, you ok with sponsoring a fix to mmax's bug? [07:28] print-camera-list udev-rules-0.98 mode 0660 group plugdev etc. [07:28] jdong_: sure [07:28] (s/ATTRS/SYSFS/) [07:28] mail me a debdiff [07:28] and should replace udev-rules-0.98 argument by udev-rules in order to generate rules for udev < 0.98 [07:28] cjwatson, should I prepare a debdiff or is it trivial enough that you can handle it? [07:28] jdong_: I'd rather you did it and tested it and such, I'm kinda swamped [07:28] or another solution would be to get udev version with udevinfo, and the script woulb be compatible with any version of udev [07:29] cjwatson, yeah sure [07:29] mmax, well fixing the package is an easier way [07:30] mmax, I've filed bug 90905 against gphoto, I will prepare a fix in about 1:30h [07:30] Malone bug 90905 in libgphoto2 "Should depend on newer udev" [Undecided,Unconfirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/90905 [07:31] mmax, thanks for letting me know [07:31] can we sync from debian/testing as well? [07:31] ok [07:31] sistpoty: yes [07:31] greate! [07:31] -e [07:31] thanks to have listening to me === dadi [n=dadi@lns-bzn-57-82-249-41-48.adsl.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel [07:35] besoin d'info sur la construction de paquets de lib et lib-dev [07:36] dadi: tu veux #ubuntu-fr :) [07:36] scuze merci [07:36] de rien [07:37] pochu, you hablo jamaican? [07:37] didnt' know that! === theCore [n=alex@ubuntu/member/theCore] has joined #ubuntu-devel === holycow [n=hello@mail.wjsgroup.com] has left #ubuntu-devel ["Ex-Chat"] === ivoks [n=ivoks@39-213.dsl.iskon.hr] has joined #ubuntu-devel === mmax [n=mmax@AAmiens-152-1-90-30.w90-34.abo.wanadoo.fr] has left #ubuntu-devel ["Konversation] [07:42] jdong_: jajaja [07:42] :) [07:42] pochu, ey manne! === j_ack [n=rudi@p508D95BA.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #ubuntu-devel === Lure [n=lure@clj46-234.dial-up.arnes.si] has joined #ubuntu-devel === jcole [i=jcole@nat/hp/x-7d26d84cf2b3756d] has left #ubuntu-devel [] === lfittl [n=lfittl@213.129.230.12] has joined #ubuntu-devel === mayday_jay [n=mayday_j@gimel.nas.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel === robitaille [n=daniel@ubuntu/member/robitaille] has joined #ubuntu-devel === zenrox [i=zenrox@pool-71-115-200-45.spknwa.dsl-w.verizon.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel [08:06] geser: if you make a bug for UVFe on gnupg2, I can upload it when it's been +1'd. I've got it built and ready for upload. :) [08:07] is it bug + mail or only mail to get an UVF exception in main? [08:08] geser: I've always just done bugs, but I haven't done that many... [08:08] I figure a bug is better in case other people want the same UVFe. :) === geser files bugs to be on the safe side === Artemis3 [n=artemis3@201.208.169.151] has left #ubuntu-devel ["Abandonando"] === supervillain [n=joelbrya@124.105.155.241] has joined #ubuntu-devel === sharms [n=sharms@ubuntu/member/sharms] has joined #ubuntu-devel === marcel [n=marcel@cust-02-D536.adsl.scarlet.nl] has joined #ubuntu-devel === Gman [i=gman@nat/sun/x-0c5f5f63d1df105f] has joined #ubuntu-devel === Monk-e [n=guido@cust-03-55bf3757.adsl.scarlet.nl] has joined #ubuntu-devel === seb128 [n=seb128@ubuntu/member/seb128] has joined #ubuntu-devel [08:17] hey guys [08:17] I would need a sponsor for bzr/bzrtools [08:17] I also have bzr-gtk, but I can ask a MOTU for that one === jack_wyt_ [n=jack@61.51.188.71] has joined #ubuntu-devel === hoora_ [i=ariel@gateway/tor/x-b76c0ebba3958434] has joined #ubuntu-devel === TeTeT [n=spindler@modemcable178.77-70-69.static.videotron.ca] has joined #ubuntu-devel === mdke [n=matt@212-139-96-9.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com] has joined #ubuntu-devel === cr3 [n=marc@pdpc/supporter/bronze/cr3] has joined #ubuntu-devel === mneptok [n=mneptok@modemcable178.77-70-69.static.videotron.ca] has joined #ubuntu-devel === Spads [n=spacehob@host-87-74-55-87.bulldogdsl.com] has joined #ubuntu-devel === mooey [n=cdr@service1.off-network.vault5.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel === daq4th [n=darkness@netstation-004.cafe.zSeries.org] has joined #ubuntu-devel === zenrox [n=zenrox@pool-71-115-200-45.spknwa.dsl-w.verizon.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel === frafu [n=frafu@vodsl-10088.vo.lu] has joined #ubuntu-devel [08:51] sigh. ENODOKO === BenSee [n=bcollins@collinsap1.phunnypharm.org] has joined #ubuntu-devel === roico_not_here is now known as roico === silwol [n=silwol@85-124-254-11.wels.xdsl-line.inode.at] has joined #ubuntu-devel === mdke [n=matt@212-139-96-9.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com] has joined #ubuntu-devel === Keybuk [n=scott@wing-commander.netsplit.com] has joined #ubuntu-devel === Keybuk [n=scott@wing-commander.netsplit.com] has left #ubuntu-devel [""] === Keybuk [n=scott@wing-commander.netsplit.com] has joined #ubuntu-devel [09:02] have a nice evening everybody! see you next week! [09:02] take care, dholbach [09:02] kylem: you too :-) [09:02] Later dholbach === tokj [n=tokj@151.82.4.114] has joined #ubuntu-devel [09:02] bye bddebian === Lure [n=lure@clj46-234.dial-up.arnes.si] has joined #ubuntu-devel === dholbach packs his record bag === kent [n=kent@82.145.145.166] has joined #ubuntu-devel === hoora_ [i=ariel@gateway/tor/x-cf5337a695517d88] has joined #ubuntu-devel === ivoks [n=ivoks@39-213.dsl.iskon.hr] has joined #ubuntu-devel === jdong [n=jdong@ubuntu/member/jdong] has joined #ubuntu-devel === bureado [n=bureado@200.84.252.214] has joined #ubuntu-devel === gicmo [n=gicmo@p5491DFC0.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel === thunderstruck [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-devel === herz1 [n=herzi@pD9E29098.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel [09:34] cjwatson: I've attached the debdiff onto bug 90724 [09:34] Malone bug 90724 in libgphoto2 "March 8 2007 updates caused EPSOn CX6400 to not be recognised" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/90724 === Lure [n=lure@clj46-234.dial-up.arnes.si] has joined #ubuntu-devel === raphink [n=raphink@ubuntu/member/raphink] has joined #ubuntu-devel === tsmithe [n=tsmithe@ubuntu/member/tsmithe] has joined #ubuntu-devel === finalbeta [n=finalbet@d54C689F7.access.telenet.be] has joined #ubuntu-devel === silwol [n=silwol@85-124-254-11.wels.xdsl-line.inode.at] has left #ubuntu-devel [] === kent [n=kent@82.145.145.166] has joined #ubuntu-devel === sacater_ [n=sacater@host81-152-158-36.range81-152.btcentralplus.com] has joined #ubuntu-devel === hoora_ [i=ariel@gateway/tor/x-3af97408394d3b4e] has joined #ubuntu-devel === Monk-e [n=guido@cust-03-55bf3757.adsl.scarlet.nl] has joined #ubuntu-devel === thunderstruck [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-devel === stub [n=stub@ppp-58.8.5.151.revip2.asianet.co.th] has joined #ubuntu-devel === wick2o [n=frank@72.25.42.88] has joined #ubuntu-devel [10:38] evening === saispo [n=saispo@ryu.zarb.org] has joined #ubuntu-devel === gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-devel [10:46] jdong: please do mail me a note at least, otherwise I'm guaranteed to forget === Mez [n=Mez@ubuntu/member/mez] has joined #ubuntu-devel [10:50] cjwatson: ok, sure === shackan [n=shackan@87.11.189.1] has joined #ubuntu-devel [11:19] uh, lp doesn't allow to close old bugs which are marked for xserver-xorg-driver-* if xorg is already marked for that bug [11:19] since it would rename the component to xorg which it can't do === Arrogance [n=aks@ottawa-hs-209-217-84-120.d-ip.magma.ca] has joined #ubuntu-devel === pax [n=pax@pdpc/supporter/student/pax] has joined #ubuntu-devel === greff [n=greff@fw.bcp.org] has joined #ubuntu-devel === lfittl [n=lfittl@chello080109027166.17.14.vie.surfer.at] has joined #ubuntu-devel === RadiantFire [n=ryan@c-69-180-43-27.hsd1.ga.comcast.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel [11:30] Hello. If any package maintainer / developer here has enough free time to manage a few new packages, then can he/she please look into adding pam_cups and pam_script into the Ubuntu repositories? [11:31] greff: -motu, better luck there [11:31] we're also a fair ways past NewPackageFreeze (or whateve we're calling it) [11:31] LaserJock: NewPackagesFreezeUnivere, in fact. [11:32] greff: You'll likely have to wait until after April. [11:32] ha, the new package police is out in full patrol! [11:32] testing alarm system.... fglrx. x264. mencoder. xgl. beryl. === Fujitsu screams. === Sanne [n=Sanne@p548D84AF.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #ubuntu-devel [11:33] lol === illovae [n=illovae@uni14-1-82-233-221-131.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel [11:33] Beryl! Attack! [11:33] Do a beryl roll! [11:33] wow, that was a bad pun. [11:33] ugh beryl [11:40] elmo: any progress on the screencasts.u.c request? === j1mc [n=jcampbel@157.199.22.99] has joined #ubuntu-devel [11:49] jdong: still around? [11:49] jdong: I don't think that fix is right - there are other keys to change [11:49] cjwatson: oh, there are? [11:50] does anyone's ipods work? Or is it just me? [11:50] jdong: can I suggest instead changing udev-rules-0.98 to udev-rules in debian/libgphoto2-2.postinst? [11:50] mdke: mine works fine. === poningru [n=poningru@pool-72-64-213-219.tampfl.fios.verizon.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel [11:50] that seems to be the "approved" method [11:50] jdong: aha. I'll go to lp then [11:50] ty [11:51] cjwatson: hmm, I'm really a clueless one when it comes to udev and friends [11:51] jdong: would be nice to try it out on an edgy-backports system ... === Sanne [n=Sanne@p548D84AF.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has left #ubuntu-devel ["Bye"] [11:51] sudo sh -c '/usr/lib/libgphoto2/print-camera-list udev-rules mode 0660 group plugdev > /etc/udev/rules.d/45-libgphoto2.rules' [11:52] cjwatson: yeah; I was under the impression that line caused the problems === lbm [n=lbm@0x555373ab.adsl.cybercity.dk] has joined #ubuntu-devel [11:52] jdong: right, but before it was "udev-rules-0.98" not "udev-rules" [11:52] and I grepped for ATTRS and that was all that came up code-wise [11:52] if you read the source for print-camera-list, it has switchability built in [11:52] you just need to call it with a different argument and you'll get SYSFS instead of ATTRS and BUS instead of SUBSYSTEM [11:53] cjwatson: oh, oops, how embarrasing :) [11:53] cjwatson: one general concern regarding this kind of situation.... if on a backports request I approve a particular version, will archive be able to process that version? [11:53] cjwatson: this situation only happened because the backport was processed some month after it was approved [11:53] sorry, what do you mean? [11:53] ah [11:54] um, can be difficult, the tool can only backport from whatever's current in a suite [11:54] s/suite/distrorelease/ [11:54] hmm [11:54] best fix is really just for us to be better about processing them quickly [11:54] the unpredictable archive turnaround time is a plaguing issue :( [11:55] or possibly to add intelligence to the tool to let us specify a version so that it will fail if there's a mismatch [11:55] elmo: is the affected laptop in LP #88332 running the latest BIOS revision? [11:55] jdong: how about http://people.ubuntu.com/~cjwatson/tmp/90724.diff ? === j1mc [n=jcampbel@157.199.22.99] has left #ubuntu-devel [] [11:56] cjwatson: yeah, a quick test-run on my feisty box does confirm that command generates SYSFS{} rules [11:59] jdong: I've diffed the rules output and it looks sensible [12:00] righto, I'll go with that then [12:00] cjwatson: yeah, awesome :) [12:02] ok, should build RSN === Monk-e [n=guido@cust-03-55bf3757.adsl.scarlet.nl] has joined #ubuntu-devel === mbiebl [n=michael@dialin-145-254-250-241.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-devel [12:05] jdong: off to bed now, if it breaks shout and either I'll look at it at some point tomorrow or somebody will beat me to it [12:05] cjwatson: haha, ok, hopefully that closes off This Month in Backports :D [12:06] Can dh_make handle zip source archives? === angasule [n=angasule@190.49.204.229] has joined #ubuntu-devel