[12:58] <asac> gnomefreak: pong
[12:59] <asac> sorry did take (mostly) of on sunday :)
[02:54] <asac> oh ... sick?
[02:55] <gnomefreak> yeah been for a few dys
[02:55] <gnomefreak> shoot i lost the bug number.
[02:56] <asac> :)
[02:57] <gnomefreak> the tb reply-to-list bug someone asked for a testing 1.5.0.2 package using that patch. i thought it was there already but i have it built already here from new description i will upload to my server
[02:57] <gnomefreak> bug 52667
[02:57] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 52667 in mozilla-thunderbird "Thunderbird doesn't support RFC-2369 based Reply-To-List" [Undecided,Fix committed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/52667
[02:57] <asac> gnomefreak: in feisty its included
[02:57] <asac> iirc
[02:57] <gnomefreak> thats what i thought oo
[02:57] <gnomefreak> too
[02:57] <asac> other branches will not receive that patch
[02:57] <asac> hmm
[02:57] <asac> let me see
[02:58] <asac> yes it has
[02:58] <asac> replytolist.dpatch
[02:58] <asac> u close?
[02:58] <asac> or me?
[02:59] <gnomefreak> ill close it if you like
[02:59] <gnomefreak> im there commenting anyway
[03:00] <gnomefreak> i cant close upstream bug though and since the patch works isnt that good enough to be closed?
[03:00] <asac> oh
[03:00] <asac> i just did it
[03:01] <asac> commented as well (e.g. pasted changelog
[03:01] <asac> )
[03:01] <asac> :)
[03:01] <asac> probably he will now understand ;)
[03:01] <gnomefreak> ah ok ty
[03:11] <dfarning> asac, ping
[03:13] <asac> dfarning: pong
[03:13] <dfarning> Hey busy week last how are things?
[03:14] <dfarning> did you get a chance to look at the LP thoughts page?
[03:14] <asac> still busy ... currently trying to update thai patch to latest
[03:14] <asac> dfarning: its on top of my TODO ... just need to get this thai thing going as beta is near
[03:15] <dfarning> sounds good I am working a turning it into some feature specs
[03:16] <dfarning> asac, is -retrace working better?
[03:18] <asac> i didn't do much retraces last week so I can't really tell. will do amd64 and ppc64 retraces tomorrow (on ubuntu machines available now) ... so then I can give feedback
[03:19] <dfarning> Thanks, I'm off to work on the crash db;)
[03:19] <asac> crash db?
[03:19] <asac> did you manage to tune into mozilla meeting?
[03:20] <asac> did you hear of anybody that did?
[03:21] <gnomefreak> i was there
[03:22] <asac> and?
[03:22] <asac> anything noteworthy?
[03:23] <gnomefreak> i missed alot of it because it started early and it was short because the calls were disconneted if you want i can post logs
[03:23] <dfarning> asac, I thought you were asking for a crash db last week;)
[03:24] <gnomefreak> ill be back in a few
[03:27] <asac> dfarning: sure i would like to see it ... just didn't know that your currently on it
[03:28] <asac> dfarning: so you're writing spec for that?
[03:28] <dfarning> I should have it pretty much together in a few days
[03:28] <asac> or just trying to gather information
[03:29] <asac> ... or even implementing ;)
[03:29] <dfarning> I'm putting together enough to have a bof at uds;)
[03:30] <dfarning> It is going to depend on buy in from a bunch of people
[03:30] <dfarning> I am taking the point of veiw that a crash db is the bottle neck to scaling Launch Pad
[03:32] <asac> yes, it is critical for crash processing ... though don't know why you say "bottleneck" in regards to launch pad?
[03:33] <asac> but i think i get it :)
[03:40] <gnomefreak> db == database?
[03:40] <dfarning> yes
[03:41] <gnomefreak> ah
[03:41] <gnomefreak> what day was our last meeting? march 6th?
[03:42] <dfarning> the first step is getting -retace to be run as a servece as soon as reports come in
[03:43] <dfarning> then get the ability to run something like bughelper to run when ever a report comes in to check for dupes
[03:43] <gnomefreak> what is ldd (WARNING: library linux-gate.so.1 not available to ldd -- skipping)
[03:43] <dfarning> then add a web interface to add new bughelper clues in real time
[03:44] <gnomefreak> that would make life easy but wont it conflict with mozilla's new backtrace thingy?
[03:44] <dfarning> linked Library
[03:45] <dfarning> just need to make them work together;)
[03:45] <gnomefreak> i might just have to look into those warnings (unless asac knows what im missing :)
[03:49] <gnomefreak> what tag are we using for duplicates?
[03:50] <dfarning> I don't think we have one yet
[03:52] <gnomefreak> ok i used mt-confirm for that one
[03:52] <gnomefreak> gnome-panel crashed damnit
[03:53] <dfarning> Got to run before I get a parking ticket. The guy just chalked my tire;(
[04:02] <gnomefreak> anyone know what file libflashplayer.so is in? is it flashplugin-nonfree or a different version?
[04:02] <gnomefreak> s/version/package
[04:04] <Admiral_Chicago> gnomefreak: yes
[04:04] <Admiral_Chicago> flashplugin-nonfree
[04:05] <gnomefreak> i have it why doies it keep failing damnit
[04:05] <gnomefreak> brb
[04:05] <asac> gnomefreak: duplicates?
[04:05] <asac> tags?
[04:05] <asac> mark duplicate? ... or you mean for proposed duplicates?
[04:05] <gnomefreak> asac: are we not tagging duplicates?
[04:05] <gnomefreak> no i mean it is a dupe (no tag?)
[04:06] <asac> you mean a tag so someone shall verify ?
[04:07] <gnomefreak> example bug xxx1 is a dupe of bug xxx2 do we tag bug xxx1?
[04:07] <asac> no ... if its marked as duplicate, then not
[04:07] <gnomefreak> k
[04:08] <asac> but maybe a tag to show that a bug is likely a duplicate ... but not sure would be good too
[04:08] <gnomefreak> i have this WARNING: library /usr/lib/firefox/plugins/libflashplayer.so not found in system packages -- ignoring
[04:08] <asac> yeah
[04:08] <gnomefreak> wtf is it ignoring for :(
[04:08] <asac> non-free
[04:08] <asac> i guess
[04:08] <asac> otherwise try gnash
[04:09] <Admiral_Chicago> if it is a duplicate and you tag it, it will not show up in search results
[04:09] <Admiral_Chicago> tag bug xxx2
[04:10] <gnomefreak> Admiral_Chicago: you can search "do not hide duplicates"
[04:10] <asac> yeah ... i mean ... don't mark it duplicate if unsure, but add tag
[04:10] <gnomefreak> brb i need to walk away for a bit before i through pc out 3rd story window
[04:10] <asac> but not sure if that is needed
[04:10] <gnomefreak> asac: im sure it was a dupe :)
[04:11] <asac> hope not ... and if eventually a false-positive bug drowns as duplicate ...
[04:11] <asac> it will reduce our bug count :)=
[04:11] <asac> damn keyboard
[04:18] <gnomefreak> this was gtk_style dupe :)
[04:21] <gnomefreak> :( flashplugin-nonfree conflicts with flashplayer-mozilla
[04:23] <gnomefreak> has anyone played with the responces wiki?
[04:24] <gnomefreak> s/responces/responses
[04:25] <asac> gnomefreak: not yet ... i started to work on some greasemonkey stuff
[04:25] <asac> but not yet usable
[04:26] <gnomefreak> k
[04:27] <gnomefreak> for flash we need one like " what flash package do you have installed and what version, can you please tun dpkg -l flash*)
[04:28] <asac> usually you can guess flash package by lib listed in report
[04:28] <asac> version of course not
[04:28] <asac> or maybe?
[04:28] <asac> what .so do you see?
[04:29] <gnomefreak> well apt-file tells me libflashplayer.so is in flashplayer-mozilla
[04:30] <gnomefreak> it doesnt list flashplugin-nonfree (maybe because i uninstalled it) but running retrace with flashplugin-nonfree and flashplayer-mozilla turns out the same
[04:30] <Admiral_Chicago> is it a transition package
[04:31] <gnomefreak> not sure it might be (atleast -mozilla package might be
[04:31] <gnomefreak> nope not from what show tells me
[04:31] <Admiral_Chicago> i see no flashplayer-mozilla for feisty
[04:32] <asac> i see libflash-mozplugin mozilla-plugin-gnash
[04:33] <asac> but i am on amd64 and have no non-free anyway :)
[04:33] <gnomefreak> Candidate: 6.0.79-0.2
[04:33] <gnomefreak>   Version table:
[04:33] <gnomefreak>      6.0.79-0.2 0
[04:33] <gnomefreak>         500 http://archive.ubuntu.com edgy/multiverse Packages
[04:33] <Admiral_Chicago> gnomefreak: http://packages.ubuntu.com/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=flashplayer-mozilla&searchon=names&subword=1&version=all&release=all
[04:33] <Admiral_Chicago> not in feisty though.
[04:33] <gnomefreak> oh im not in feisty im in edgy chroot
[04:34] <Admiral_Chicago> its flash player 6 afaik
[04:37] <gnomefreak> it is but there are so many flash packages i can sit here and guess at it all day so i asked him package and version of flash he uses
[05:43] <gnomefreak> asac: we have master bug for @g_timeout_dispatch right?
[05:44] <asac> yep
[05:45] <asac> 76608D
[05:45] <asac> ups
[05:45] <asac> bug 76608
[05:45] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 76608 in firefox "MASTER [@g_timeout_dispatch]  [@nsAppShell::Run] " [High,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/76608
[05:45] <asac> hmm
[05:45] <asac> bug 89601
[05:45] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 89601 in firefox "MASTER [@g_timeout_dispatch]  libflashplayer.so" [Undecided,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/89601
[05:45] <asac> exists as well
[05:46] <gnomefreak> i see nsAppShell in mine. What is the other one for?
[05:46] <asac> don't know
[05:46] <asac> i didn't mark it master afaik
[05:47] <gnomefreak> ok ill look at it in a moment
[05:47] <asac> its a dupe
[05:47] <asac> you can merge it down
[05:47] <asac> oldest bug should be master then
[05:47] <gnomefreak> k
[05:50] <gnomefreak> fixed
[05:51] <AlexLatchford> bug 91646
[05:51] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 91646 in gnome-panel "[apport]  gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_menu_shell_deactivate()" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/91646
[05:52] <AlexLatchford> pretty damn cool what David Linked
[05:53] <asac> so it works?
[05:53] <asac> or was that just a testrun?
[05:54] <dfarning> I thought might work remotely
[05:54] <dfarning> but maybe only from the DC
[05:55] <asac> dfarning: does run automatically?
[05:57] <dfarning> not yet this was Martin implementing the new LP feature of attaching file to existing issue
[06:00] <asac> ah :)
[06:03] <gnomefreak> wtf is that
[06:04] <gnomefreak> Apport retracing service? i wanna play ;)
[06:04] <asac> i guess not much to play
[06:04] <asac> it will *just* work if done :)
[06:04] <dfarning> no not yet sorry;)
[06:05] <dfarning> one more step though;(
[06:05] <gnomefreak> oh that is automatic when apport sends crash report on feisty?
[06:06] <dfarning> not yet
[06:06] <AlexLatchford> gnomefreak: nah its automatic uploading on retrace I believe
[06:06] <dfarning> yes
[06:07] <AlexLatchford> dfarning: got a Derivative Team meeting soon right?
[06:07] <dfarning> yes an hour or so
[06:07] <gnomefreak> so when apport uploads the files the bot automaticlly retraces it?
[06:07] <AlexLatchford> dfarning: ill lend my ears to that one :)
[06:07] <gnomefreak> what is the derivative team?
[06:07] <dfarning> AlexLatchford,  thanks
[06:08] <asac> unfortunately i will be a away soon for tonight :/
[06:08] <dfarning> gnomefreak, I have start another team to help bring ubuntu derivivatives into the ubuntu community
[06:08] <asac> will read logs
[06:08] <gnomefreak> oh cool
[06:09] <gnomefreak> finding a bunch of gtk_style_attach bugs :)
[06:09] <dfarning> it lets us get more leverage to implement the crash handling stuff we would like to do;)
[06:11] <dfarning> asac, just a meeting to set the mission and priorities and other admin stuff
[06:12] <gnomefreak> do you have wiki/LP page?
[06:13] <dfarning> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DerivativeTeam
[06:19] <gnomefreak> ty
[06:27] <gnomefreak> asac: if you are here can you look at stacktrace on bug 91504  hes using java6 on edgy and it looks like a java crash (what do we do keep it or reject it)
[06:27] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 91504 in firefox "Firefox frequently crashes" [High,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/91504
[06:33] <asac> its not java
[06:33] <asac> but javascript garbage collector
[06:33] <asac> there should be another already
[06:33] <asac> search js_Mark
[06:33] <asac> or MarkGCThingChildren
[06:34] <asac> i guess i already set summary for that to master
[06:34] <asac> maybe search MarkScopeProperty
[06:34] <asac> ok
[06:44] <gnomefreak> asac: when you get back. I am unable to find anything with those summaries and i dont see one on js_* that looks right.
[06:51] <asac> gnomefreak: maybe  ask dfarning how we can search with bughelper
[06:51] <gnomefreak> k
[06:51] <asac> i have seen the MarkGCThing more then once
[06:51] <asac> i swear
[06:51] <asac> :)
[06:51] <gnomefreak> i saw that one
[06:51] <gnomefreak> but its not same stacktrace
[06:51] <asac> bug 90566
[06:51] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 90566 in firefox "Firefox crashed [@js_MarkGCThing] " [Undecided,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/90566
[06:52] <asac> according to hjmf bug 90540 is similar
[06:52] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 90540 in firefox "[feisty]  Firefox Crashed [@js_atom_marker] " [High,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/90540
[06:52] <gnomefreak> 90540 has #6  0xb7ebe5e3 in JS_DHashTableEnumerate
[06:53] <gnomefreak> 91504 #6  0xb7e77469 in MarkGCThingChildren
[06:54] <asac> bug 91504
[06:54] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 91504 in firefox "Firefox frequently crashes" [High,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/91504
[06:54] <gnomefreak> oh wait i see js_DHas.... lower in #9
[06:55] <asac> hmm
[06:55] <asac> don't merge them from how
[06:55] <gnomefreak> it looks different
[06:55] <asac> just fix summary
[06:55] <asac> and set to mt-confirm
[06:55] <gnomefreak> ok
[06:55] <asac> i have to look into them
[06:55] <asac> maybe try to gather infos of users on what they did at that time or before
[06:56] <asac> probably they closed a tab of something
[06:56] <asac> or so
[06:56] <asac> ok gone for sure now
[06:56] <asac> infos from users of all three bugs :)
[06:57] <gnomefreak> i still have a feeling its the version of java installed on users systems but i will see what i can come up with
[06:57] <asac> maybe
[06:57] <asac> its related
[06:57] <asac> but the bug is definitly a firefox one
[06:57] <asac> at least most most likely
[06:58] <asac> best: we can reproduce
[07:27] <gnomefreak> bug 90376
[07:27] <Ubugtu> Malone bug 90376 in firefox "Firefox https broken in some cases" [Undecided,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/90376
[08:07] <gnomefreak> @schedule new_york
[08:07] <Ubugtu> Schedule for America/New_York: Current meeting: Derivative Team | 13 Mar 12:00: Forum Council | 13 Mar 16:00: Technical Board | 14 Mar 16:00: Edubuntu | 15 Mar 15:00: Audio Team | 15 Mar 17:00: Ubuntu Development Team