[12:34] asac: bug 92731 looks like a feisty theme crash reported about 18 hours ago. hard to tell because stack doesnt give anything im used to seeing towards the end. the gtk_style_attach [12:34] Malone bug 92731 in firefox "[feisty] Firefox Crashed [@IA__gtk_style_unref] " [Undecided,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/92731 [12:35] ah the [@IA__gtk_style_unref] i missed that part. is this the same as the rest of the "new" non background ones? [12:40] gnomefreak: let me look [12:40] looks like my connection did last for 3 hours :) [12:40] success [12:40] im looking through the gtk ones for the slacker on ei saw a day ago [12:40] asac: sweet :) [12:41] hmm [12:41] let me think [12:41] search for InstantiatePlugin [12:41] iirc this was added to title [12:42] ah [12:42] searhc for reflow [12:42] i named it [12:42] crash in reflow [... something] [12:42] i have 2 IA_gtk_style_default_backgrounds here bugs 90994 bug 91011 mark as dupes make one a master? [12:42] Malone bug 90994 in firefox "firefox crash x86_64" [High,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/90994 [12:42] Malone bug 91011 in firefox "firefox crash x86_64" [High,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/91011 [12:43] ha i was just at this one :) [12:45] i have the feeling that the retrace is wrongful for them [12:46] could very well be [12:47] look at the first [12:47] bug 90994 [12:47] Malone bug 90994 in firefox "firefox crash x86_64" [High,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/90994 [12:47] the initial submitted stacktrace.txt [12:47] is already symbolized [12:47] its probably the gtk_style_realize thing [12:47] i have gtk_style_attach nsAppStartup::Run on a feisty bug [12:48] yeah ... i still think that it would be gtk_style_realize if it would be properly symbolized [12:48] keep those open ... maybe bdmurray did something wrong [12:48] this wasnt done by him this was reporters stack :) [12:48] bug 91054 [12:48] Malone bug 91054 in firefox "[Feisty FireFox crashed [@gtk_style_realize] " [High,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/91054 [12:48] the damn email malone didnt work :( [12:49] oh [12:49] i ment the x86_64 bugs [12:49] keep them open [12:49] :) [12:49] i will run them on automated machine [12:50] tomorrow [12:50] ok [12:50] noted: bug 90994 and bug 91011 ... need retrace tomorrow :) [12:50] Malone bug 90994 in firefox "firefox crash x86_64" [High,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/90994 [12:50] Malone bug 91011 in firefox "firefox crash x86_64" [High,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/91011 === gnomefreak wonders why email messed up bad :( [12:51] about your tb2 build [12:51] did patches really apply? [12:51] most of them [12:51] looks like they did [12:51] only 3 didnt [12:51] which did you disable? [12:51] omg i have to look but either way its a FTB [12:52] anyway [12:52] i think you lack some configure switches [12:52] but not sure [12:52] if you name patches I would have to drop I can try [12:53] pangoxft_linkage, 10_visablity_hidden [12:53] and replytolist [12:53] the rest took [12:54] firefox3.0 failed (dont htink i had source since no make file or configure file. gave up looking for source [12:54] hmmm freddy still sends html mail :( [12:54] hmm [12:54] and tb2 failed from that post i sent you [12:54] yeah [12:54] i will look tomorrow [12:55] should be fairly easy :) [12:55] k [12:55] i cannot see from error ... because I need to look where the symbol that it is not finding is actually implemented [12:55] bug 90112 to go witht he other 2 you are gonna look at [12:55] Malone bug 90112 in firefox "[feisty] Firefox Crashed x86_64" [Undecided,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/90112 [12:55] asac: ah [12:56] omfg [12:56] asac: i have more of them. [12:56] :) [12:56] i guess i can just search for x86_64 [12:56] :) [12:56] either this IA__gtk_style_apply_default_background is bad crash or something is wrong [12:57] bug 90159 :) [12:57] Malone bug 90159 in firefox "[feisty] Firefox Crashed x86_64" [Undecided,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/90159 [12:57] i think brian retraced amd64 on i386 [12:57] he might have [12:57] i tried to ask him but never got any answer [12:57] these are his too [12:57] i have another one :) [12:57] i gave him instructions to go for amd64 bugs [12:57] https://bugs.beta.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+packagebugs-search?field.searchtext=gtk&orderby=-importance&search=Search&field.status%3Alist=Unconfirmed&field.status%3Alist=Needs+Info&field.assignee=&field.owner=&field.omit_dupes=on&field.has_patch=&field.has_no_package=&field.distribution=ubuntu&field.sourcepackagename=firefox most of these are them [12:57] .... because i thought he has amd64 ... he started to backtrace amd64 and asked how to do properly [12:58] hmm so which one is the slacker.com [12:58] ? [12:58] its not instantiateplugin [12:58] apparently that one is the bug i visted right after slacker.com crash [12:59] thats why my brain mixed up [12:59] not sure yet one is bug 92921 [12:59] Malone bug 92921 in firefox "crashes upon loading slacker.com" [High,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/92921 [12:59] but there is another one out there but it might have gone to 72018 [12:59] hmm [12:59] has no summary [12:59] thought I already summarzied the slacker.com [12:59] one [01:01] nsAppShell::Run is the saem bug as the other ones as stack looks identical [01:01] which is it? [01:01] was filed on march 12th [01:01] bug 91758 [01:01] Malone bug 91758 in firefox "[feisty] Firefox Crashed x86_64 [@gtk_style_realize] " [Undecided,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/91758 [01:02] hmm [01:02] ok [01:02] i thik we should accept that the bug is not gone [01:02] however [01:02] hjmf is getting thosebackground ones too [01:02] question is still if rate has reduced [01:02] yeah [01:03] hmm [01:03] lets see what i get tommorow [01:03] it seems to but i would see how the background ones turn out. if they are same than still crashing alot [01:03] hmm [01:03] so you have one that hjmf did? [01:04] bug 92727 [01:04] Malone bug 92727 in firefox "[feisty] Firefox Crashed [@IA__gtk_style_apply_default_background] " [Undecided,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/92727 [01:04] ok ill be back i have to eat dinner (little late) [01:06] fine [01:08] hopefully we find a testcase for IA__gtk_style_apply_default_background soon [01:08] we saw any old reports that have the same element? [01:08] or is this really NEW ? [01:09] maybe its because feisty has now new gnome ... aka new gtk [01:09] and its in fact the same bug? [01:09] gnomefreak: what trace do you get from the apple ads page with latest feisty? [01:10] still gtk_style_realize [01:10] ... or maybe now IA__gtk_style_apply_default_background ? [01:10] :) [01:10] http://www.apple.com/getamac/ads/ [01:11] is the urls (out of my head) === ..[topic/#ubuntu-mozillateam:asac] : Home of Ubuntu Mozilla Team - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam | Bug Triagers read: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/States & https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/Tags | Preview archives at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/PreviewArchives === asac gone [03:28] asac: i get the gtk_style_realize but i will try again [03:30] i ant reproduce it at this time [03:30] cant === Admiral_Chicago [n=Admiral_@adsl-69-209-70-250.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === gnomefreak gone for night im finallly tired [03:41] night [03:41] night === omgponiezlol [n=Admiral_@adsl-68-255-100-205.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === omgponie1lol [n=Admiral_@adsl-69-209-74-9.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === omgponiezlol [n=Admiral_@adsl-69-209-49-62.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === Admiral_Chicago [n=Admiral_@adsl-69-209-66-214.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === asac_ [n=asac@debian/developer/asac] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === poningru [n=poningru@pool-72-64-213-219.tampfl.fios.verizon.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === asac_ [n=asac@debian/developer/asac] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === asac_ [n=asac@debian/developer/asac] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === asac [n=asac@debian/developer/asac] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === asac_ [n=asac@debian/developer/asac] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === AlexLatchford [n=alex@82-44-193-109.cable.ubr07.haye.blueyonder.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [12:02] Hey gnomefreak you about? === asac [n=asac@debian/developer/asac] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === hjmf [n=hjmf@62.Red-83-45-116.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [02:43] here [02:44] oh we are still frozen :( [03:01] asac: bug 90477 im still looking upstream but wouldnt this be more of a firefox-gnome-intergation feature more so than firefox? [03:01] Malone bug 90477 in firefox "Copy/paste does not work if Firefox is closed down" [Undecided,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/90477 [03:07] the widest search i could think of for upstream firefox https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=Copy%2Fpaste+ [04:05] asac: devel meeting it looks like [04:15] this still bothers me WARNING: library /var/cache/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so not found in system packages -- ignoring because i look in varr/cache and its there but this could be why most flash retraces are light. === gnomefreak gone for a while === AlexLatchford [n=alex@82-44-193-109.cable.ubr07.haye.blueyonder.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [05:36] gnomefreak: Mark Shuttleworth reports a bug and you set importance only to "medium"? [05:36] rofl === asac [n=asac@debian/developer/asac] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [06:38] hjmf: its not an important bug [06:39] its DOm imspector [06:46] this is strange [06:51] i cant reproduce it :( [06:52] asac: you around? [07:00] mozilla-firefox-dom-inspector needs to be rebuilt it looks like it depends on a package it conflicts with :) [07:02] grabbing source will look at it [07:34] this is bad IMHO [07:34] one depedns on other and the other conflicts with the first one === gnomefreak found own bug while working on marks :( [07:37] i guess its made to not be used if so i think it needs to be removed but will get with asac on mondayish about it === gnomefreak away now === hjmf [n=hjmf@62.Red-83-45-116.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === asac [n=asac@debian/developer/asac] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === AlexLatchford [n=alex@82-44-193-109.cable.ubr07.haye.blueyonder.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [09:07] bug 84716 [09:07] Malone bug 84716 in firefox "firefox crashes, screen divides after applying orca screen reader" [High,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/84716 [09:08] Think this guy isn't really experiencing a bug, think he may have just modified where the magnifier is set to appear and because it is fairly strange thing to see on your screen he thinks its a bug.. === poningru [n=poningru@pool-72-64-227-172.tampfl.fios.verizon.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [09:13] AlexLatchford: i would find out if there is a way to make it full screen or partial screen that way it should just be a setting. i cant find it atm on my system but will look in a bit [09:14] well there are 4 point you input to determine the 4 corners of the magnifier [09:15] orca is a speach thing? [09:15] speech even [09:15] Welcome to Orca setup. [09:15] Select desired speech server. [09:15] 1. eSpeak GNOME Speech Driver [09:15] 2. Festival GNOME Speech Driver [09:15] Enter choice: [09:15] No, it is also a magnifier [09:16] ok brb have to log out === gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [09:18] mine is split left to right [09:19] and it screws with the gtk windows [09:19] thats not good IMHO === gnomefreak doesnt know what im doing with it but i couldnt move it to full screen at all [09:25] asac: is java able to be backported? [09:32] asac: i talked to jdong about backporting java6 to edgy to fix bug 92880 im gonna play with it here see if i can build it and try it on edgy and i will get up with you when i have more [09:32] Malone bug 92880 in firefox "Firefox crashes with java applet" [High,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/92880 [10:08] gnomefreak: Tested, with java6 there is no crash [10:08] hjmf: im building now for backports on edgy and see if my build works ill send it to jdong :) [10:09] excellent :) [10:11] you have bug number handy? [10:11] oh duh nvm [10:24] that was easy enough [10:25] hjmf: do you have edgy to test this with the next few days? [10:26] gnomefreak: yes [10:27] ok uploading tonight will give link to you. this was a fast test build not official [10:27] ok, tell me then. [10:27] now I'm going to close till tomorrow. see you [10:28] ok see you check topic when you get online i wont be here tomorrow [10:28] k === ..[topic/#ubuntu-mozillateam:gnomefreak] : Home of Ubuntu Mozilla Team - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam | Bug Triagers read: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/States & https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/Tags | Preview archives at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/PreviewArchives | Java6 packages for testing in Edgy at http://gnomefreak.youmortals.com/Java6-Edgy/ | Please test java6 in Edgy so we can backport it without too much hassle. See bug 92880 for [11:04] ack === ..[topic/#ubuntu-mozillateam:gnomefreak] : Home of Ubuntu Mozilla Team - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam | Bug Triagers read: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/States & https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/Tags | Preview archives at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/PreviewArchives | Java6 packages for testing in Edgy at http://gnomefreak.youmortals.com/Java6-Edgy/ | Please test java6 in Edgy. See bug 92880 for one test. === ..[topic/#ubuntu-mozillateam:gnomefreak] : Home of Ubuntu Mozilla Team - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam | Bug Triagers read: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/States & https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/Tags | Preview archives at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/PreviewArchives [11:17] bug 92880 [11:17] Malone bug 92880 in firefox "Firefox crashes with java applet" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/92880 [11:34] priview archives? [11:42] its fixed look in backports [11:42] java6 is in backports [11:42] in edgy [11:42] he forgot so i built them