[10:55] <gnomefreak> why do people do that crap :(
[11:33] <poningru> do what?
[11:35] <gnomefreak> attach crash reports to random bugs
[11:36] <gnomefreak> and he said this isnt the same as the above crashes :(
[12:00] <gnomefreak> i made bug 91582 master for @nsEventQueueImpl::GetYoungestActive] 
[12:00] <ubotu> Malone bug 91582 in firefox "MASTER [edgy]  firefox crash [@nsEventQueueImpl::GetYoungestActive] " [High,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/91582
[12:11] <gnomefreak> what is the 64bit tag for auto retrace?
[12:14] <hjmf> hi
[12:14] <hjmf> anyone knows why apport retracing service is trying to retrace already retraced reports?
[12:15] <hjmf> ie: bug 94882 and bug 95680
[12:17] <gnomefreak> hjmf: are they tagged?
[12:18] <gnomefreak> i just taged one not sure if one of those
[12:21] <hjmf> they are tagged but not sure who did. The first bug is already a dup and the second was assigned to flash
[12:23] <hjmf> bug 94882 is marked need-i386-retrace when it is already retraced :/
[12:23] <ubotu> Malone bug 94882 in firefox "[feisty]  Firefox Crashed -libjavaplugin- [@JavaPluginFactory5::CreateSecureEnv]  (dup-of: 86002)" [High,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/94882
[12:23] <ubotu> Malone bug 86002 in firefox "MASTER firefox crash in java [@JavaPluginFactory5::CreateSecureEnv]  [@ProxyJNIEnv] " [High,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/86002
[12:24] <hjmf> not a problem, but if it is done by some kind of bot it is a waste of resources
[12:24] <gnomefreak> im checking atm
[12:25] <hjmf> ... and bug 95680 was already retraced too
[12:25] <ubotu> Malone bug 95680 in firefox "firefox crash" [Undecided,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/95680
[12:26] <gnomefreak> fixed
[12:26] <gnomefreak> the logs doesnt say who changed tags :(
[12:27] <gnomefreak> looks like someone is just randomly tagging them without reading
[12:30] <hjmf> ** Tags added: need-i386-retrace < sender "Apport retracing service <apport@piware.de>"
[12:30] <hjmf> I guess that is some kind of automated task
[12:31] <hjmf> that's on a mail from bug 95680
[12:31] <ubotu> Malone bug 95680 in firefox "firefox crash" [Undecided,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/95680
[12:32] <gnomefreak> hmmmmm thats bad
[12:32] <gnomefreak> it shouldnt be set to auto tag bugs
[12:32] <gnomefreak> who is in charge of that?
[12:32] <hjmf> agree this will lead in to a mess in the trheads
[12:33] <hjmf> Daniel Holbach was doing tests last weeks
[12:33] <hjmf> s/weeks/week
[12:36] <hjmf> also from Martin Pitt email "In the future, apport will file crash bugs with the right tag already
[12:36] <hjmf> attached to it, so that the manual tagging will not be necessary any
[12:36] <hjmf> more."
[12:37] <hjmf> ... but those were already triaged reports...
[12:43] <gnomefreak> pitti did it for the 64bit bad retraces (i guess he automated something and it caused a bit of spam it seems
[12:45] <gnomefreak> im gonna mark some to see if him fixing chroot makes a difference.
[12:47] <gnomefreak> if someone gets time and energy and knows how to read stacks could that person work on the bugs tagged mt-needsummary/mt-confirm
[01:27] <gnomefreak> didnt we have a master for IM_get_input_context
[01:36] <hjmf> b
[01:36] <hjmf> gnomefreak: bug 85627
[01:36] <ubotu> Malone bug 85627 in firefox "MASTER firefox crash [@ IM_get_input_context]  when watching video" [High,In progress]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/85627
[01:39] <gnomefreak> ty
[02:51] <gnomefreak> asac: i assigned bug 48714 to you to look at
[02:51] <ubotu> Malone bug 48714 in firefox ""Getting started" and "Latest Headlines" not localized." [Medium,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/48714
[02:56] <asac> gnomefreak: ok
[02:56] <asac> 2.0.0.3 has gone up
[02:58] <gnomefreak> cool
[03:04] <asac> for bug 48714 ... i don't know ... probably low priority
[03:04] <ubotu> Malone bug 48714 in firefox ""Getting started" and "Latest Headlines" not localized." [Medium,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/48714
[03:04] <asac> i guess there should be a way to fix it somehow
[03:04] <gnomefreak> wtf :(
[03:05] <asac> we probably could use localized bookmarks.html ... which gets installed
[03:05] <asac> on first run
[03:05] <gnomefreak> feisty's apport wont retrace locally
[03:05] <asac> i guess we should figure out how to do it on our own
[03:05] <asac> e.g. with gdb + core dump
[03:05] <asac> i guess hjmf knows how :)
[03:05] <gnomefreak> thats only for LP retraces
[03:06] <gnomefreak> cant use gdb locally iirc
[03:06] <asac> ... should be possible
[03:09] <hjmf> gnomefreak: just run the gdb against the coredump file with ff -dbgsym installed
[03:11] <hjmf> the command was:
[03:11] <hjmf> gdb -nx /usr/lib/firefox/firefox-bin -core CoreDump 2>&1 | tee gdb.log
[03:11] <hjmf> with the uncompressed coredump file
[03:12] <gnomefreak> ill see if i can do that but im doubting it due to something with the report.
[03:12] <asac> hjmf: thanks!
[03:12] <hjmf> and inside gdb just exec the command 'bt' iirc
[03:12] <asac> can you add that to wiki?
[03:12] <asac> gnomefreak: can you try?
[03:12] <hjmf> asac: which wiki?
[03:13] <gnomefreak> im going to
[03:13] <asac> mozillateam :)
[03:13] <hjmf> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs
[03:13] <hjmf> I meant which page :)
[03:14] <asac> ah :)
[03:14] <asac> somewhere in bug triaging
[03:15] <asac> # MozillaTeam/Bugs/Triage/Debugging ?
[03:15] <hjmf> OK I'll have to look, lets confess that I haven't read the wiki for some time
[03:15] <hjmf> :)
[03:15] <asac> there is no suitable place for the momemt :)
[03:15] <asac> so we open a new page like above
[03:15] <asac> :)
[03:15] <hjmf> OK but my english sucs
[03:15] <asac> it might as well deserve infos on tricks on how to retrace properly :)
[03:16] <asac> hjmf: no problem ... just setup a draft
[03:16] <asac> without complete sentences
[03:16] <hjmf> :)
[03:16] <gnomefreak> add it to the apport page :)
[03:16] <asac> i think AlexLatchford or somewone will fix wording :)
[03:16] <gnomefreak> we need to rework it anyway for newest apport if we ever get the hang of it
[03:17] <asac> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/Apport/Retrace
[03:17] <asac> ok
[03:17] <asac> we can add that there
[03:17] <asac> and link from Triage page to it
[03:17] <hjmf> OK I'll add the gdb stuff to that page
[03:18] <asac> cool
[03:18] <asac> if you see outdated stuff on apport in general
[03:18] <asac> feel free to fix that :)
[03:18] <asac> gnomefreak: what happened to the apport hooks "micro-project" ?
[03:18] <asac> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/Apport
[03:19] <asac> is https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/Apport/Hooks
[03:19] <asac> in a releasable state?
[03:19] <asac> dfarning not here :(
[03:21] <asac> https://bugs.beta.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/88506
[03:21] <ubotu> Malone bug 88506 in firefox "apport hook patch" [Wishlist,In progress] 
[03:21] <asac> ok thats the bug
[03:29] <gnomefreak> ok ill be back i have some yard work to get done so the bug spam stops for a bit :)
[03:29] <hjmf> gnomefreak: have you tried apport-unpack v0.70 against edgy reports? I get an error
[03:29] <gnomefreak> i just got update for it right now
[03:30] <gnomefreak> any locally ran retrace on feisty apport 0.69 crashes
[03:30] <hjmf> Me too, but now it can't unpack those reports, want to see if it's only me
[03:30] <gnomefreak> so ill see if .70 works better
[03:32] <asac> hmm sounds bad
[03:32] <asac> broken apport-retrace
[03:39] <hjmf> no it's apport-unpack
[03:39] <hjmf> maybe they are focusing too much towards feisty
[03:40] <hjmf> but not a big problem
[03:40] <asac> ah 0.7 is broken in edgy?
[03:40] <asac> ok
[03:40] <hjmf> it's broken for unpacking edgy reports
[03:40] <hjmf> not in edgy
[03:41] <hjmf> I can do it by hand
[03:41] <hjmf> it's just that I was writing the howto retrace coredumps with gdb and I noticed whilw testing on edgy crash reports
[03:48] <asac> ah ok
[04:05] <hjmf> ... just noticed that apt-get didn't finished to upgrade my sistem
[04:05] <hjmf> apport-unpack 0.70 works as it should... my fault
[04:31] <asac> cool ... just out of the box?
[04:33] <gnomefreak> when someone has 30 seconds to a minute can you try to reproduce bug 66199
[04:33] <ubotu> Malone bug 66199 in firefox ""Choose Helper Application" dialogue doesn't offer access to /usr/bin/" [Medium,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/66199
[05:20] <hjmf> I can reproduce it, but is that a problem?
[05:20] <hjmf> I can click left arrow twice and go to /, then select /usr/bin
[05:21] <hjmf> but since in usr/bin there are hundreds of apps I guess that the best way is to type directly the path/to/the/app you want to use
[05:21] <hjmf> IMHO
[05:23] <gnomefreak> i didnt have to do anything i just clicked on filesystem and it gave me everything
[05:23] <hjmf> for me, on top was a right arrow and home_dir, but I saw your screeshot
[05:23] <hjmf> s/screeshot/screenshot
[05:24] <hjmf> I'm on feisty... but I don't see where is the problem that the reporter stats
[05:26] <gnomefreak> me neither
[05:26] <gnomefreak> maybe pure laziness?
[05:26] <hjmf> lol
[05:27] <hjmf> just close it, or put in the wishlist
[05:28] <gnomefreak> i might. want to have smoke first
[05:30] <asac> you already see 2.0.0.3 in archive?
[05:31] <gnomefreak> nope not as of 5 minutes ago
[05:31] <gnomefreak> checking agaiin now. brb smoke
[05:31] <asac> ok
[05:35] <gnomefreak> there are updates but hasnt finished runing update yet
[05:35] <gnomefreak> so not sure what they are
[05:35] <gnomefreak> hjmf: did you tell him to use the back arrow?
[05:36] <gnomefreak> no firefox upgrades
[05:36] <gnomefreak> compiz compiz-core compiz-gnome compiz-gtk compiz-plugins feisty-session-splashes gtkhtml3.8 libdecoration0 libgtkhtml3.8-15
[05:37] <gnomefreak> did someone need to push it? or are you able to push it yourself?
[05:37] <gnomefreak> after push to archives it should get updated within the next hour. iirc upgrades are done every hour
[05:45] <asac> dunno of build state
[05:45] <asac> there were problems which should be fixed by now
[05:45] <asac> e.g. infrastructure problems
[05:45] <gnomefreak> hmm
[05:46] <gnomefreak> ill be back later im having issues keeping eyes open
[05:47] <asac> https://beta.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/2.0.0.3+1-0ubuntu1
[05:47] <asac> i386 is built  so should be there soon
[05:55] <hjmf> ... a total freeze of the system
[05:55] <hjmf> back again 8(
[06:07] <hjmf> ~$ find /var/crash/ -ctime -1 | wc
[06:07] <hjmf>      10      10     456
[06:08] <hjmf> lol 10 crash reports to upload
[06:09] <hjmf> one from peercast and other from beryl ...
[06:09] <hjmf> which I wasn't aware that were running at all
[06:10] <hjmf> time to review which applications are running in my feisty desktop and why :/
[06:17] <hjmf> when did I ever installed peercast ?
[06:42] <asac> :)
[06:42] <asac> who knows
[07:02] <hjmf> yes, who knows :)
[07:24] <hjmf> gnomefreak: just noticed your post at bug 96544 after the upload of a second retrace
[07:24] <ubotu> Malone bug 96544 in firefox "[edgy]  firefox crash [@nsCOMPtr_base::assign_with_AddRef]  [@nsCSSSelector::Reset] " [Undecided,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/96544
[07:27] <gnomefreak> fixed'
[07:27] <hjmf> oh ok :)
[07:28] <gnomefreak> @schedule new_york
[07:28] <ubotu> Schedule for America/New_York: 27 Mar 04:00: MOTU | 27 Mar 16:00: Technical Board | 28 Mar 16:00: Edubuntu | 28 Mar 18:00: Xubuntu | 29 Mar 17:00: Ubuntu Development Team | 01 Apr 16:00: Marketing Team
[07:36] <asac> night gnomefreak
[08:09] <asac> hjmf: Bug 96571 :) has an attachment
[08:09] <asac> probably it took the user some time to upload :)
[08:10] <asac> ubotu: is dead?
[08:10] <ubotu> Sorry, I don't know anything about is dead? - try searching on http://bots.ubuntulinux.nl/factoids.cgi
[08:11] <hjmf> asac: noticed, I've already retraced the attachment :)
[08:11] <asac> ubotu: what about Bug 96571
[08:11] <ubotu> Malone bug 96571 in firefox "[edgy]  firefox crash [@nsMimeTypeArray::GetMimeTypes] " [Undecided,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/96571
[08:11] <asac> :)
[08:29] <hjmf> afk for a while
[08:35] <asac> Bug 96593
[08:35] <ubotu> Malone bug 96593 in firefox "Firefox crashes on using <Alt>+left arrow" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/96593
[08:35] <asac> what does the user claim? "... and so on"
[08:35] <asac> are those his bugs?
[08:35] <asac> bug 6215
[08:35] <ubotu> Malone bug 6215 in libranlip "libranlip: merge new debian version" [Medium,Fix released]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/6215
[08:35] <asac> bug 2122
[08:35] <ubotu> Malone bug 2122 in soyuz "+sources should include a link to batched list of all source packages" [Medium,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/2122
[08:35] <asac> 12385
[08:35] <asac> bug 12385
[08:35] <ubotu> Malone bug 12385 in firefox "Left and right arrow keys do not work correctly when entering text into text boxes" [Medium,Fix released]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/12385
[09:08] <gnomefreak> i need to learn to set my email for bugs up :(
[09:10] <gnomefreak> asac: do you have link to malone email site?
[09:16] <hjmf> https://help.launchpad.net/UsingMaloneEmail
[09:17] <gnomefreak> i found it and filed a test bug
[09:18] <hjmf> many features didn't work for me
[09:18] <hjmf> I guess that is related to lp permissions
[09:18] <gnomefreak> nothing worked for me last time.
[09:18] <hjmf> ie batch emails didn't work for me
[09:18] <hjmf> out for dinner
[09:18] <gnomefreak> to file a bug its sent to "new#bugs.launchpad.net"?
[09:18] <gnomefreak> @ even
[09:27] <gnomefreak> as you here?
[09:27] <gnomefreak> asac: you here?
[09:28] <asac> gnomefreak: yes
[09:28] <asac> you have to sign your mail
[09:28] <asac> with gpg
[09:28] <gnomefreak> the affects line in reporting a bug to LP from email should look like "affects ubuntu/mozilla-thunderbird?
[09:28] <asac> with the key you have in launchpad
[09:29] <gnomefreak> i sign all my emails :)
[09:31] <gnomefreak> no matter what i seem to use it fails on affects
[09:31] <gnomefreak> affects /distros/ubuntu/firefox
[09:31] <gnomefreak> what should i replace /distros/ with?
[09:33] <asac> hmm
[09:33] <asac> any answer?
[09:33] <asac> from malone
[09:35] <gnomefreak> i keep getting failed to send
[09:35] <gnomefreak> i used /ubuntu/mozilla-thunderbird im gonna try /distros/ubuntu/mozilla-thunderbird
[09:35] <asac> failed to send?
[09:36] <asac> sorry have not tried email interface
[09:36] <asac> its just tooo spartanic for me
[09:36] <asac> as i am used to debian bts mail interface
[09:36] <gnomefreak> oh i thought you were using it
[09:36] <asac> which is great :)
[09:36] <asac> i am just replying through it
[09:36] <asac> no modifications so far
[09:36] <gnomefreak> oh
[09:45] <gnomefreak> The following packages have been kept back: firefox-dbgsym firefox-gnome-support-dbgsym
[09:45] <gnomefreak> i guess waiting for firefox push?
[09:56] <hjmf> omg apport 0.71 is out. Five hours afeter apport 0.70
[09:57] <gnomefreak> yep
[10:04] <gnomefreak> bug 83422
[10:04] <ubotu> Malone bug 83422 in malone "Targeting sourcepackages in distroreleases using the email interfaces crashes the email handler" [Undecided,Fix committed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/83422
[10:05] <asac> firefox-dbgsym et al are in way for upgrading firefox
[10:05] <asac> so remove them if you want to upgrade
[10:05] <asac> new dbgsym will take a bit i guess
[10:07] <gnomefreak> k
[10:08] <gnomefreak> trying it again
[10:11] <gnomefreak> nope still not updating
[10:12] <gnomefreak> its not showing held back or anywhere
[10:12] <asac> still on 2.0.0.2?
[10:12] <asac> do you see 2.0.0.3 in apt-cache show firefox
[10:12] <asac> ?
[10:12] <gnomefreak> yep
[10:12] <gnomefreak> nope
[10:13] <asac> probably not yet on your mirror then
[10:13] <gnomefreak> uk mirror you would think would get it first
[10:13] <asac> first will be archive.ubuntu.com i guess
[10:13] <gnomefreak> we will see in a few hours
[10:13] <gnomefreak> thats what i got
[10:14] <gnomefreak> but depending wher eyou are will depends what mirror it uses
[10:14] <asac> yeah buts not there
[10:14] <gnomefreak> US archive.ubuntu.com its uk
[10:14] <gnomefreak> US uses
[10:14] <asac> k
[10:30] <gnomefreak> keeping busy with bugs?
[10:30] <gnomefreak> lol
[10:31] <gnomefreak> i think i got most of the email crap to malone working :(
[10:32] <gnomefreak> checking to see if edgys has been updated
[10:35] <gnomefreak> will play with apport tomorrow im no longer in the mood tonight
[10:36] <hjmf> :)
[10:51] <hjmf> no way even in the fakechroot created by apport-chroot I get a python exception when trying to retrace
[10:52] <hjmf> too late for me. see you tomorrow
[10:52] <gnomefreak> night
[10:53] <hjmf> good night
[11:23] <gnomefreak> asac: what is Spamato extension for thunderbird? something we support?
[11:30] <gnomefreak> it uses java it seems so im gonan try to rule out java before rejecting the bug.
[11:52] <asac> gnomefreak: don't think that we support Spamato ... but actually it depends
[11:52] <asac> if the bug is definitly Spamato only, we might consider to reject it
[11:52] <asac> otherwise probably not
[11:55] <asac> interesting
[11:55] <asac> Bug 89023
[11:55] <ubotu> Malone bug 89023 in firefox "Update of Firefox disables PSM (not more SSL or saved passwords)" [High,Fix released]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/89023
[11:55] <asac> google toolbar appears to cause https/PSM probleams
[11:55] <asac> can this really be the case?
[11:56] <asac> ubuntu-desktop-effects <gnomefreak@ubuntu.com> ??
[12:00] <asac> did you manage to update state by mail?
[12:00] <asac> gnomefreak: ^^^
[12:00] <asac> i think i should try it as well
[12:00] <asac> launchpad is just too slow some times