[01:58] <doko> should I report a bug, if the stylesheet isn't correctly loaded, and the page looks messy?
[02:00] <beuno> doko: yes, with as much information as possible
[02:01] <doko> beuno: well, it's not reproducible ... even reloading makes the stylesheet appear
[02:01] <beuno> doko: konqueror?
[02:01] <doko> no, standard ubuntu firefox
[02:02] <beuno> well, it's a glitch in your system then probably
[02:02] <beuno> if you can reproduce it again, then report it please
[02:07] <jamesh> doko: there is an intermittent bug where firefox receives zero length replies to some requests
[02:07] <jamesh> doko: that is probably what you are seeing
[02:08] <doko> jamesh: should that be reported as a firefox issue?
[02:09] <jamesh> doko: I'm not sure it is a firefox issue -- I think it is specific to our site
[02:11] <doko> hmm, ok. fortunately it's a known issue
[02:13] <pochu> jamesh: doko has a different issue than the bin file... which is that the page loads, but without the css, which makes the page looks really ugly
[02:14] <pochu> doko: I also have that issue, but it's not very frequently
[02:14] <jamesh> pochu: I think it's the same issue, but occuring when loading CSS or javascript rather than the main page
[02:14] <pochu> well, then fixing it will fix the 3 problems :)
[02:15] <pochu> I have all them :(
[02:30] <doko> jamesh: interesting? on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/2.2.0-0ubuntu2 I get the stylecheet, but not on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org-l10n/2.2.0-0ubuntu2
[02:31] <pochu> doko: aren't you using the beta?
[02:31] <pochu> I have the stylesheet in both pages, though I'm with the beta
[02:32] <doko> no beta
[02:34] <doko> anyway, good night
[02:35] <jamesh> doko: consistently?
[02:36] <jamesh> doko: I haven't found a consistent way to trigger the problem (if it fails on one load, it passes the next time, etc)
[02:36] <doko> jamesh: you're right, a reload may fix it :-(
[02:57] <lcampagn> Anybody else having a hard time logging in to launchpad?
[02:58] <spiv> lcampagn: it's working ok for me.
[03:00] <lcampagn> When I try to log in, I just get the login screen again. No wrong password error message, just a fresh login screen.
[03:07] <zyga> I cannot access bug pages that are filed for my package
[03:07] <zyga> there are non-closed bugs around but the bug page says there are none
[03:10] <zyga> bah I got it 
[03:10] <zyga> pages for specific release (feisty) do not contain bugs listed in the distro
[03:10] <zyga> that's not so good really - there are 3 places one can report a bug
[03:11] <zyga> 1) to a product
[03:11] <zyga> 2) to ubuntu source
[03:11] <zyga> 3) to ubuntu source for a specific release
[03:35] <ubotu> New bug: #98826 in launchpad-bazaar "codebrowse urls are long and confusing" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/98826
[03:40] <ubotu> New bug: #98828 in launchpad-bazaar "codebrowse source listings don't contain line number anchors" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/98828
[07:20] <ubotu> New bug: #98867 in launchpad-bazaar "LP shows the http:// URL for branches that haven't been published yet." [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/98867
[09:06] <dneary> hi
[09:38] <carlos> morning
[09:40] <LaserJock> morning
[09:40] <LaserJock> I'm guessing it's time for me to go to bed
[09:40] <LaserJock> I've say good night and good morning to carlos in the same day
[09:41] <carlos> LaserJock: ;-)
[09:41] <LaserJock> good night all :-)
[09:47] <sadleder> hi, anyone here able to do a rename of a launchpad product
[09:47] <sadleder> ?
[10:00] <carlos> sadleder: If you are the owner, you should be able to do it
[10:01] <sadleder> carlos: am I?
[10:01] <carlos> sadleder: do you see an 'Administer' action on the Overview section ?
[10:02] <sadleder> carlos: I am not the owner of https://launchpad.net/gnomescan, but tienne told me he was not able to rename it
[10:03] <carlos> hmm, maybe is restricted to some admins, let me check
[10:03] <sadleder> hmm, "Project Maintainer: Registry Administrators"
[10:04] <carlos> sadleder: gnomescan is owned by Etienne
[10:06] <sadleder> ok, so how is he supposed to rename the product?
[10:06] <sadleder> it's name is now gnome-scan, not gnomescan
[10:10] <carlos> ok, it's something available only to admins
[10:10] <carlos> so he's not able to do that
[10:11] <carlos> and the fact that I have access to that page is just an accident
[10:11] <carlos> please, file a ticket at https://launchpad.net/launchpad/+tickets requesting the rename
[10:11] <carlos> so the admin that is suppsed to handle that request does it
[10:28] <sadleder> carlos: ok, thank you
[10:34] <carlos> sadleder: you are welcome
[12:20] <ubotu> New bug: #98950 in launchpad "Batched result pages break "click-sortable" columns" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/98950
[12:29] <cprov> morning folks !
[12:50] <pochu> is LP down?
[12:51] <totalwormage> no
[12:51] <pochu> no, works now
[12:51] <pochu> :)
[12:51] <totalwormage> :p
[01:42] <Kuhrscher> Hello
[01:43] <Kuhrscher> carlos: Is it possible that k3b (version 1.0 in Feisty) still has the old 0.12.x template and translations in Rosetta?
[01:44] <Kuhrscher> carlos: Perhaps this happend because the translations have been released in a separate i18n package...
[02:44] <carlos> Kuhrscher: maybe, if the package is still in universe as it used to be in Edgy...
[02:45] <carlos> Kuhrscher: let me check...
[02:57] <dem> hmm, i submmited updated po/pot files to launchpad's translation tool like a few days ago and they are still not showing up in launchpad
[02:57] <dem> who do i need to gt in touch with
[03:00] <ubotu> New bug: #98942 in launchpad "Launchpad typo error -1" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/98942
[03:00] <ubotu> New bug: #98944 in launchpad "Launchpad typo error -2" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/98944
[03:01] <salgado> dem, carlos 
[03:02] <dem> okay
[03:02] <carlos> Kuhrscher: new translations are imported, seems to be an outdated .pot file, but I can fix it quite easily, thanks for the warning
[03:02] <carlos> dem: doing .po uploads?
[03:04] <dem> yeah, sent them in (i think) tue morning
[03:04] <dem> checked on them today still not update
[03:04] <dem> the project name is: drapes
[03:05] <carlos> the queue is a bit busy right now
[03:06] <carlos> so unfortunately, is normal
[03:07] <carlos> dem: we are working to give high priority to non Ubuntu imports so when Ubuntu has a bunch of imports, products are not affected
[03:19] <dem> ok
[04:32] <Kuhrscher> Carlos: Thanks for checking the k3b issue
[04:32] <carlos> np, thanks for tell us about the problem
[04:33] <Kuhrscher> Btw, is there any progress regarding these desktop-* po files?
[04:34] <Kuhrscher> Carlos: For german I uploaded the translations manually but they still seem to be stuck in the queue...
[04:35] <carlos> Kuhrscher: right now, the queue is handling a full kde-i18n-* import
[04:35] <carlos> I fixed some, but until current import finish
[04:35] <carlos> is a bit hard to know what else needs fixing
[04:35] <carlos> so I'm just waiting for that run to be finished
[04:35] <Kuhrscher> Isn't the kde translation already imported?
[04:36] <carlos> full KDE import takes a while to complete
[04:36] <carlos> it is
[04:36] <carlos> but
[04:36] <carlos> seems like after beta we got a new version imported
[04:37] <carlos> in fact, I guess that's because Riddell added the missing desktop .po files
[04:37] <Kuhrscher> Interesting, I though the most recent version is already in Feisty...
[04:37] <Kuhrscher> Ahh, nice to hear :)
[06:59] <shirish> ok anybody up?
[07:01] <shirish> any launchpad staff here?
[07:02] <shirish> any launchpad experts here?
[07:03] <pochu> shirish: what's up?
[07:03] <shirish> pochu, can u delete a bug report reported by me, I have made a duplicate
[07:03] <pochu> shirish: I can mark it as a duplicate
[07:03] <pochu> and you too ;)
[07:03] <shirish> how do I mark a duplicate?
[07:04] <pochu> shirish: there is a "Mark as duplicate" in the left menu, isn't there?
[07:05] <shirish> pochu: got it, as marking duplicate should I give the bug no. of what its duplicate of
[07:05] <pochu> shirish: yeah :)
[07:06] <shirish> pochu: Did it, can u look at my bug report & give me any suggestions as to what I should have improved upon?
[07:07] <pochu> shirish: if you give me the bug number, yes
[07:07] <shirish> pochu, the duplicate I marked is l8ter on when I was in ubuntu I tried to use the launchpad integration in 7.04 beta & it didn't add much
[07:07] <shirish> just a moment, please
[07:07] <shirish> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/99090
[07:07] <ubotu> Malone bug 99090 in Ubuntu "apt-get unable to read /etc/apt/sources.list" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  
[07:08] <pochu> shirish: the first thing is that the bug is filed under no package. It should be under "apt"
[07:08] <pochu> shirish: so the devs can notice it
[07:08] <shirish> damn, now I can't change tht
[07:08] <pochu> yes, you can
[07:08] <shirish> I was trying for apt-get
[07:08] <shirish> pochu: how? sorry, newbie here
[07:09] <pochu> shirish: click in "Ubuntu" (beside unconfirmed" and point the package to "apt")
[07:10] <shirish> pochu: I did a mistake here, instead of clicking on Ubuntu I clicked & now Baltix linux down of Ubuntu, anyway I can delete tht first?
[07:11] <pochu> hehe, what did you do?
[07:11] <pochu> shirish: we can reject it :)
[07:11] <pochu> shirish: you don't need to add another task, just change the "Ubuntu" task
[07:11] <pochu> to point to apt (Ubuntu)
[07:12] <shirish> I already did tht, but now can I kill the task somehow or no?
[07:12] <shirish> also is there a way to reject or delete it by the reporter themselves or no?
[07:14] <shirish> pochu: are u there?
[07:14] <pochu> shirish: yeah, there is
[07:15] <pochu> shirish: you can't delete the task, but you can reject it
[07:15] <shirish> pochu: how?
[07:15] <pochu> shirish: click on apt (Baltix) and reject it
[07:16] <shirish> pochu: thnx I think I did it, should it look like tht?
[07:16] <pochu> shirish: cool :)
[07:17] <shirish> pochu: ok thnx, now I wait for ur verdict on what else I could have added or deleted from the bug-report itself
[07:18] <pochu> let's see
[07:20] <pochu> shirish: run "apt-get" in the terminal, and put the output in a comment. Also, attach in the comment your file /etc/apt/sources.list
[07:20] <pochu> shirish: BTW, the main server is in London, I think :)
[07:21] <shirish> pochu: I'm in windows atm, I'm also unable to run GAIM for some reason, don't know why, although 'm able to browse the net, right now talking through windowsxp
[07:21] <pochu> shirish: ok, when you are back to Ubuntu, update your system, and then see if it works again
[07:21] <shirish> pochu: you mean change it back to main server?
[07:22] <pochu> if you can dist-upgrade with your mirror, you don't have to do that
[07:22] <pochu> but if it doesn't work, change to another mirror
[07:23] <shirish> pochu: what do u mean dist-upgrade please clarify, although I can see the indian mirror & have also downloaded couple of debs just to see tht the mirror is working or not.
[07:25] <pochu> shirish: open Update Manager, update, and install the updates
[07:25] <shirish> pochu: also can u again run by what ddo u mean by run "apt-get" in the terminal, and put the output in a comment? How do I do tht?
[07:25] <shirish> pochu: I have tried tht with the Main server as well as the Indian Server doesn't work, if u want will try again
[07:26] <pochu> shirish: open a terminal, write "apt-get" and type enter, then copy everything and put it in the bug report
[07:26] <shirish> the error comment of not being able to read sources, it came while i did sudo apt-get update
[07:26] <pochu> shirish: also attach /etc/apt/sources.list
[07:26] <shirish> pochu: ok will do.
[07:26] <pochu> shirish: what you've filed isn't a bug, but a problem with your mirror (which isn't Ubuntu's fault, btw)
[07:27] <shirish> pochu: I have been trying to update both with the main server & the indian server & with both its failing, with the main server, I'm able to just get the package-listing as to how many packages are updates but after it fails, will try again though.
[07:28] <shirish> I hope ur here when I come back, sorry for being a nuisance
[08:26] <samurai> hi everyone
[08:26] <samurai> have a quick question?
[08:27] <samurai> if you experience an issue with Launchpad/Malone how should that be reported?
[08:27] <ddaa> samurai: by filing a bug on "malone"
[08:27] <ddaa> though, it depends on the nature of the issue
[08:27] <samurai> error report upload error 
[08:28] <ddaa> mh... that's probably a known bug, but malone is the right place too look
[08:28] <samurai> basically ddaa encountered an error while trying to upload a crash report from another app
[08:28] <samurai> k thanks 
[08:28] <ddaa> https://launchpad.net/malone/+bugs
[08:29] <samurai> thanks much
[08:29] <ddaa> samurai: sounds like https://bugs.beta.launchpad.net/malone/+bug/87638
[08:29] <ubotu> Malone bug 87638 in malone "Attempting to upload a crash report, apport failed with "HTTP Error 500: Internal Server Error"" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]   - Assigned to Bjrn Tillenius (bjornt)
[08:29] <ddaa> I mean https://bugs.launchpad.net/malone/+bug/87638
[08:30] <samurai> I'll take a look a that one too
[08:34] <samurai> actually it isn't related to that one
[08:34] <samurai> although I did log one the other day that was similar to that
[08:41] <shirish> ok anybody out there?
[08:42] <shirish> can somebody help me with finding out, the bug report tht my launchpad integrated with Ubuntu sent?
[08:42] <kiko> shirish, huh?
[08:43] <shirish> kiko, hi I am using feisty which has this report a problem thing, it sent a bug-report of an application crash, anyway to know where it sent
[08:43] <kiko> shirish, it sent it to ubuntu/+bugs
[08:43] <shirish> kiko: so how do I find out which one is mine & can u give me the whole link please.
[08:46] <matsubara> shirish: did the tool give you any number or code to find out your bug number?
[08:46] <kiko> it must have
[08:48] <shirish> matsubara: how do I give the tool any number or code?
[08:49] <shirish> it seems to a pretty automated beast or is there any hidden preference to it?
[08:50] <samurai> ddaa: where I get confused is in selecting the package with the problem. If I put "Malone" in as the package  I get a message saying "malone does not exist in Ubuntu" 
[08:51] <ddaa> samurai: malone is not a package
[08:51] <matsubara> samurai: malone is not a ubuntu package. it's the name of the bug trackers itself
[08:51] <matsubara> bug tracker, i mean
[08:51] <ddaa> samurai: and launchpad is not _just_ the ubuntu bug tracker
[08:51] <samurai> right so how do you log an error with Malone
[08:51] <samurai> that was my original question above
[08:52] <ddaa> https://launchpad.net/malone/+bugs
[08:52] <ddaa> as I pasted before
[08:52] <samurai> sorry I didn't understand that then... 
[08:52] <matsubara> shirish: ok, let's start from the beginning. When your application crashed, what happened?
[08:52] <ddaa> even https://launchpad.net/malone/+filebug
[08:52] <samurai> cool thanks for being a pest :-)
[08:52] <samurai> actually sorry for me being a pest
[08:53] <shirish> matsubara: it was software sources which crashed & then the ubuntu bug report a problem thing showed up
[08:53] <samurai> I need more coffee :-)
[08:53] <ddaa> nevermind, it's going to our quotes page anyway
[08:53] <samurai> nice
[08:53] <shirish> it asked me whether I want to give the smaller report or the bigger report
[08:53] <samurai> ddaa: now I get it
[08:54] <shirish> matsubara: it asked me whether I want to give the smaller report or the bigger report
[08:54] <matsubara> shirish: ok, I'm following. and then?
[08:54] <shirish> matsubara: the smaller report was 23.1 KB & the bigger report was 1 MB
[08:55] <shirish> matsubara: then naturally I went for the bigger report, it reported & closed by itself
[08:55] <shirish> there was no report as to whether it was successful or not, if it was successful, any  bug no. or something like mozilla does
[08:55] <shirish> matsubara: there was no report as to whether it was successful or not, if it was successful, any  bug no. or something like mozilla does
[08:55] <shirish> matsubara: mozilla/firefox does
[08:56] <shirish> matsubara: also do not know if there is a cache or log where it has all the things it did, it should be somewhere
[08:57] <shirish> matsubara: any clues or nothing at all?
[08:59] <shirish> I guess not :(
[09:00] <matsubara> shirish: AFAIK, somewhere between the "choose report to send" and "reporting it", it should present an URL or code that you can use to finish the bug report
[09:06] <ubotu> New bug: #99127 in malone "Encounter a urlopen error 104 when Apport was uploading to Malone" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/99127
[09:37] <kiko> the also notified list for ubuntu answers is just amazing.
[09:47] <jwendell> Hi kiko. Could you change bug tracker for f-spot? It uses gnome bugzilla
[09:47] <kiko> jwendell, is it part of the gnome project?
[09:48] <jwendell> kiko, not yet
[09:48] <kiko> jwendell, do you want to own it?
[09:48] <jwendell> kiko, no
[09:48] <kiko> ok
[09:48] <kiko> done
[09:49] <kiko> jwendell, thanks! keep it coming
[09:49] <jwendell> kiko, thanks
[10:02] <bdmurray> Does malone just silently drop e-mail attachments for bugs?
[10:03] <kiko> bdmurray, yeah, currently.
[10:06] <bdmurray> I understand there is a bug about it already, but would there way to e-mail senders of attachments to add them via the web interface?
[10:06] <bdmurray> I seem to be telling people to go to the bugs web page a lot recently.
[10:09] <kiko> bdmurray, hmmmm. I think I get errormail when that happens. do you really want me to look into this today? :)
[10:11] <bdmurray> kiko: what do you mean?
[10:20] <ubotu> New bug: #99160 in launchpad "test bug -- rejected" [Undecided,Rejected]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/99160
[10:22] <kiko> bdmurray, well, just that I'm super busy today
[10:22] <bdmurray> kiko: I understand.  If seems technically possible I'd be happy to submit a bug report.
[10:23] <bdmurray> If it that is
[10:23] <kiko> bdmurray, I think there's a bug open and BjornT_ actually meant to fix it a month or two ago
[10:23] <kiko> but we have been overrun
[10:24] <ploum> hello
[10:24] <ploum> I want to request access to staging.launchpad.net
[10:24] <ploum> In order to be able to develop conseil
[10:24] <matsubara> bdmurray: bug 99160 is your answer. I just filed it with an attachment. the attachment is silently dropped and now warning
[10:24] <ploum> http://conseil.fritalk.com/
[10:24] <ubotu> Malone bug 99160 in launchpad "test bug -- rejected" [Undecided,Rejected]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/99160
[10:24] <bdmurray> kiko: okay well if best solution isn't far off then a temporarly solution seems excessive
[10:24] <kiko> yeah, it's actually not so difficult
[10:25] <bdmurray> not as difficult as my typing it seems
[10:26] <matsubara> bdmurray: bug 30225 is the one you're looking for, btw.
[10:26] <ubotu> Malone bug 30225 in malone "Attach files via email" [High,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/30225 - Assigned to Bjrn Tillenius (bjornt)
[10:26] <bdmurray> matsubara: thanks I found that
[10:27] <kiko> matsubara, you are 10/10
[10:27] <matsubara> ploum: staging is currently closed for some internal testing, we'll re-open it next week
[10:28] <ploum> matsubara: it will stay open then ?
[10:28] <matsubara> ploum: AFAIK, yes.
[10:29] <ploum> (so I suppose that I cannot join the beta-test team then ;-)
[10:29] <matsubara> ploum: yes, you can. Just apply in launchpad-beta-testers
[10:30] <ploum> I applied
[10:31] <ploum> thanks :-)
[10:31] <matsubara> mrevell: ^
[10:43] <nilton> hello to all
[10:44] <LaserJock> hi nilton 
[10:45] <nilton> hello
[10:45] <nilton> I ask myself in which time arrived the CDs that pedi is for the Flisol Peru 
[10:45] <LaserJock> 2/act
[10:46] <LaserJock> argg, sorry
[11:58] <kiko> what did we do now
[11:58] <somerville32> You made salgado leave, no doubt.
[11:59] <kiko> he doesn't want to go to the party on the weekend
[11:59] <kiko> no clue why
[11:59] <somerville32> hehe.
[11:59] <somerville32> Anyhows, You wouldn't happen to know if the voting stuff salgado was working on is ready or not, would you?
[12:00] <kiko> depends on what voting stuff that is
[12:03] <somerville32> The voting stuff for the CC nomination confirmation vote
[12:04] <kiko> what was pending work on the launchpad side, do you know?
[12:05] <Kmos> when there is the next developer meeting? isn't at topic
[12:06] <somerville32> Thu 29 Mar, 1400 UTC
[12:07] <kiko> always on thursday, yes.
[12:07] <Kmos> today is 30 :)
[12:07] <Kmos> and in one our here will be 31 :)
[12:07] <Kmos> *hour
[12:08] <Kmos> 05 April ?
[12:08] <Kmos> :)
[12:08] <Kmos> or 18 ?
[12:08] <somerville32> 18th is Wednesday
[12:08] <Kmos> yeah
[12:08] <Kmos> 19
[12:10] <somerville32> :)