[08:23] <man-di> vi1: good morning
[08:23] <vi1> man-di, morning
[08:23] <vi1> I am sorry, I wass
[08:23] <vi1> was ko yesterday
[08:24] <man-di> thats no problem at all
[08:25] <vi1> there is some pbuilder chroot that I can use for it
[08:29] <vi1> man-di, the problem I was stuck yesterday is
[08:29] <vi1> X11 connection rejected because of wrong authentication.
[08:29] <vi1> when I try to run eclipse under the pbuilder chroot (root user)
[08:30] <vi1> DIPLAY variable is set correctly (locahost:12) , but I guess the problem is different user than that who created the ssh connection.
[08:30] <vi1> any hint?
[08:33] <man-di> xauth
[08:33] <man-di> the problem is that the MIT cookie does not match
[08:33] <man-di> gone
[08:42] <man-di> the problem is that the MIT cookie does not match
[08:43] <man-di> damn jsf
[08:50] <vi1> man-di, so here we go http://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/15750/
[08:53] <man-di> huh
[08:53] <man-di> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.eclipse.swt.SWTError
[08:53] <man-di> can you check this swt is successfully installed?
[08:53] <man-di> and includes the classes it should
[08:54] <man-di> I guess there is no org.eclipse.swt.gtk.linux.sparc_3.2.2.R3_2_maintenance.jar but a org.eclipse.swt.gtk.linux.sparc64_3.2.2.R3_2_maintenance.jar
[08:55] <man-di> ?
[08:55] <man-di> thats the problem then if thats the case
[08:58] <vi1> org.eclipse.swt.gtk.linux.sparc_3.2.2.R3_2_maintenance.jar is there
[08:58] <man-di> hmmm
[08:58] <vi1> swt looks ok so far
[08:59] <man-di> !MESSAGE The following is a complete list of bundles which are not resolved, see the prior log entry for the root cause if it exists:
[08:59] <man-di> !SUBENTRY 1 org.eclipse.osgi 2 0 2007-04-15 07:26:12.147
[08:59] <man-di> !MESSAGE Bundle update@plugins/org.eclipse.swt.gtk.linux.sparc_3.2.2.R3_2_maintenance.jar [6]  was not resolved.
[08:59] <man-di> !SUBENTRY 2 org.eclipse.swt.gtk.linux.sparc 2 0 2007-04-15 07:26:12.148
[08:59] <man-di> !MESSAGE Platform filter did not match: (& (osgi.ws=gtk) (osgi.os=linux) (osgi.arch=sparc))
[08:59] <man-di> !SUBENTRY 2 org.eclipse.swt.gtk.linux.sparc 2 0 2007-04-15 07:26:12.149
[08:59] <man-di> !MESSAGE Missing Constraint: Fragment-Host: org.eclipse.swt; bundle-version="[3.0.0,4.0.0)"
[08:59] <man-di> something is borked in SWT
[08:59] <vi1> swt has jni bindings, maybe that thing
[09:01] <man-di> can you paste the manifest of org.eclipse.swt.gtk.linux.sparc_3.2.2.R3_2_maintenance.jar please?
[09:03] <vi1> sure
[09:04] <vi1> http://paste.ubuntu-nl.org/15754/
[09:06] <vi1> can the (osgi.arch=sparc) clause cause the troubles?
[09:06] <man-di> and uname -m return sparc64?
[09:06] <man-di> vi1: thats what I think: sparc vs sparc64
[09:08] <man-di> from the first paste: BootLoader constants: OS=linux, ARCH=sparc64, WS=gtk, NL=en_US
[09:08] <man-di> different archs
[09:08] <vi1> Linux sparky 2.6.17-11-sparc64 #2 Thu Feb 1 19:25:47 UTC 2007 sparc64 GNU/Linux
[09:09] <man-di> so what we need to know now: are all supported sparc sparc64 or do we need to care about sparc(32) too?
[09:10] <man-di> vi1: is there a linux32 command on the sparc?
[09:11] <vi1> man-di, just a sec, swt install does not look so good any more
[09:11] <vi1> the swt.jar link is dead
[09:11] <vi1> let me fix that and try again
[09:13] <man-di> eclipse doest use the swt.jar link in /usr/share/java
[09:13] <man-di> thats a different story
[09:13] <man-di> thats only for 3rd party apps
[09:15] <vi1> ok, now I see it
[09:16] <vi1> there is also a slight difference between linux and sparc in the naming
[09:16] <vi1> org.eclipse.swt.gtk.linux.sparc_3.2.2.R3_2_maintenance.jar
[09:16] <vi1> org.eclipse.swt.gtk.linux.x86_3.2.2.v3236.jar
[09:16] <vi1> i meant x86
[09:17] <man-di> hmmm
[09:18] <man-di> that is becuase we use SWT from ia64 for all officially-non-supported archs
[09:18] <man-di> SWT versions are not all the same for the different archs
[09:18] <man-di> vi1: when you exec linux32 and then run eclipse I really wonder if it works or if the error message is different
[09:19] <vi1> man-di, linux32 eclipse makes a difference :)
[09:19] <vi1> eclipse booting up
[09:19] <man-di> hehehe
[09:19] <vi1> you was right from the very beggining ;)
[09:20] <man-di> thanks for the flowers
[09:20] <man-di> now lets think how to solve that
[09:20] <man-di> I dont know enough about sparc to decide what to do
[09:20] <man-di> I think
[09:21] <vi1> man-di, on the other hand, it crashed again ;)
[09:21] <man-di> vi1: what does uname -m output under linux32?
[09:21] <man-di> oh?
[09:21] <man-di> error message?
[09:21] <vi1> jvm crash
[09:22] <man-di> uuffffff
[09:22] <man-di> thats no bug in eclipse then ;-)
[09:22] <vi1> i can send you a scrshot
[09:22] <man-di> vi1: that would be great
[09:23] <man-di> dcc doesnt work here
[09:23] <man-di> I'm behind a firewall
[09:23] <vi1> ok, mail
[09:24] <man-di> there was some pasting service for images...
[09:24] <man-di> if I would remember the url
[09:26] <vi1> linux32 uname -m
[09:26] <vi1> sparc
[09:26] <man-di> okay, thats what I guessed
[09:27] <man-di> perhaps we should patch eclipse's arch detection code
[09:27] <man-di> you dont know if the userland of sparc is always 32 bit or sometimes 64 bit?
[09:28] <man-di> sparc64 only means the kernel is 64bit
[09:30] <vi1> no idea, i am old-school x86 guy
[09:31] <man-di> we can ask doko
[09:33] <man-di> nice screenshot
[09:40] <vi1> nice screenshot not saying anything
[09:43] <man-di> well, it says which arch, which runtime, etc.
[09:47] <man-di> I should do a debian bts eclipse bug triaging
[01:20] <Mammnon> hello everybody
[01:21] <Mammnon> may I ask a question?