=== geser [i=mb@ubuntu/member/geser] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== Kmos [n=gothicx@unaffiliated/kmos] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== ubotu [n=ubotu@ubuntu/bot/ubotu] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== jml_ [n=jml@59.167.203.115] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== effie_jayx [n=valles@190.37.175.250] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== freet15 [n=freet15@61.149.0.98] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== effie_jayx [n=valles@190.37.175.250] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== poolie [n=mbp@ppp112-44.static.internode.on.net] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== effie_jayx [n=valles@190.37.175.250] has joined #launchpad | ||
ubotu | New bug: #106889 in launchpad "Typo in Answers Tab Tooltip (for People/Teams)" [Undecided,Unconfirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/106889 | 03:30 |
---|---|---|
=== effie_jayx [n=valles@190.37.175.250] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== Hobbsee [n=Hobbsee@ubuntu/member/hobbsee] has joined #launchpad | ||
mpt | Gooooooooooooooooood afternoon Launchpadders! | 04:29 |
ajmitch | hello mpt | 04:30 |
=== effie_jayx [n=valles@190.37.175.250] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== stub [n=stub@ppp-58.8.11.197.revip2.asianet.co.th] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== mthaddon [n=mthaddon@canonical/launchpad/mthaddon] has joined #launchpad | ||
Hobbsee | hi mpt! | 04:38 |
=== effie_jayx [n=l3ap@190.37.175.250] has joined #launchpad | ||
ajmitch | aha, Hobbsee | 04:39 |
Hobbsee | ajmitch: indeed! | 04:39 |
ubotu | New bug: #106900 in malone "Confusing batched notification if attachment is quickly removed" [Undecided,Unconfirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/106900 | 04:45 |
=== mthaddon [n=mthaddon@canonical/launchpad/mthaddon] has joined #launchpad | ||
Hobbsee | looks like we have a spammer. https://launchpad.net/bounties/winmodem-support | 05:05 |
ubotu | New bug: #106908 in malone ""Report a new bug" page for non-LP-using project needs beautifying" [Undecided,Unconfirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/106908 | 05:16 |
mpt | ugh, bounties still show up? | 05:18 |
mpt | they should have a "sorry, we're closed" sign | 05:19 |
ubotu | New bug: #106909 in launchpad-bazaar "faq should explain how imports work" [Undecided,Unconfirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/106909 | 05:20 |
=== Bhaskar1 [n=Bhaskar1@202.79.37.177] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== superm1 [n=superm1@ubuntu/member/superm1] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== BjornT [n=bjorn@canonical/launchpad/BjornT] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== tj9991 [n=tslocum@c-67-183-68-252.hsd1.wa.comcast.net] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== mthaddon [n=mthaddon@canonical/launchpad/mthaddon] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== fabbione [i=fabbione@gordian.fabbione.net] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== mthaddon [n=mthaddon@canonical/launchpad/mthaddon] has joined #launchpad | ||
poolie | lifeless: now launchpad has visible dildos too: http://librarian.launchpad.net/6561186/Corrupt2.png | 07:18 |
ubotu | New bug: #106924 in malone ""Is this a new tag?" question is tautological" [Undecided,Unconfirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/106924 | 07:20 |
poolie | bug 85575 | 07:20 |
ubotu | Malone bug 85575 in vte "gnome-terminal reacting very sluggishly" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/85575 - Assigned to Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs) | 07:20 |
lifeless | nice | 07:20 |
=== Seveas [n=seveas@ubuntu/member/seveas] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== jamesh_ [n=james@canonical/launchpad/jamesh] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== mthaddon [n=mthaddon@canonical/launchpad/mthaddon] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== superm1 [n=superm1@ubuntu/member/superm1] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== ubotu [n=ubotu@ubuntu/bot/ubotu] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== jamesh_ is now known as jamesh | ||
BjornT | lifeless: time for reviewer meeting? | 08:09 |
lifeless | cool | 08:10 |
lifeless | I wasn't sure if it was now or +1 hour | 08:10 |
lifeless | reviewer meeting now | 08:10 |
lifeless | spiv: | 08:10 |
lifeless | jamesh: | 08:10 |
jamesh | hi | 08:11 |
spiv | Hello | 08:11 |
lifeless | just setting up | 08:12 |
lifeless | agenda for now | 08:12 |
=== Sewar [n=Mohammed@166.87.122.60] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== Sewar [n=Mohammed@166.87.122.60] has left #launchpad [] | ||
lifeless | * Roll call | 08:12 |
lifeless | * Next meeting | 08:13 |
lifeless | * Queue status. | 08:13 |
lifeless | * How are post-merge reviews of rs/trivial commits going? (BjornT for .eu) | 08:13 |
lifeless | * Training up reviewers - to discuss (BjornT for .eu) | 08:13 |
lifeless | * [fasttrack] (BjornT for .eu) | 08:13 |
jamesh | the pending-reviews script is part way through a run (started at 05:42 UTC) | 08:13 |
lifeless | * Urgent review requests (lifeless for .au) | 08:13 |
lifeless | next meeting at the usual time ? | 08:15 |
jamesh | sure. | 08:15 |
BjornT | sure | 08:15 |
spiv | Sure. | 08:15 |
=== Sewar [n=Mohammed@166.87.122.60] has joined #launchpad | ||
lifeless | queue status | 08:17 |
lifeless | so spiv, bjornt and jamesh you all have red reviews on my screen | 08:17 |
=== Sewar [n=Mohammed@166.87.122.60] has left #launchpad [] | ||
jamesh | lifeless: I've done that one since pending-reviews was last generated | 08:18 |
spiv | I have one less than on the current page. | 08:18 |
lifeless | heh | 08:18 |
lifeless | meeeting syndrome :) | 08:18 |
spiv | Which still leaves me with two, though :) | 08:18 |
BjornT | i will do mine today. i had friday off, that's why i didn't do them then. | 08:19 |
lifeless | BjornT: was that an urgent thing, or preplanned ? | 08:20 |
spiv | And I've been sucking because I've been focussing on bzr, but after the freeze kicks in tomorrow morning I won't have that excuse any more. | 08:20 |
spiv | I should have realised how little launchpad review time I'd have earlier and punted my reviews :/ | 08:20 |
lifeless | right | 08:20 |
lifeless | I was about to say something along those lines | 08:21 |
BjornT | lifeless: i requested the day off a few days in advance. i didn't bother adding it to PendingReviews since one day usually doesn't make much difference. | 08:22 |
lifeless | BjornT: I think that assessment was wrong - please in future do let me know. | 08:22 |
lifeless | reviews are a significant latency in the development cycle; where we dont need that latency we shouldn't have it. | 08:23 |
lifeless | leave and being busy are both avoidable things, and its up to us to avoid them - in both cases by signalling you dont have review cycles for that time period. | 08:23 |
BjornT | lifeless: ok, will do that in the future. i guess we should add notices for public holidays as well, then? | 08:23 |
lifeless | yes, I think so. | 08:23 |
lifeless | jamesh: so what happened with that 10 day review? how did it get so old? | 08:24 |
jamesh | I didn't allocate enough time for reviews last week. Also, it was 5 days old by the first work day it was on my queue (which isn't an excuse for not sending the review last week) | 08:26 |
lifeless | jamesh: well 5 days old, 4 of which were weekend and pub holiday; so I should be saying '10 -4 -2' == 4 days old review. | 08:27 |
lifeless | which sounds much less several | 08:27 |
lifeless | subjective/objective time in a sense. | 08:27 |
lifeless | *severe* I mean. | 08:28 |
lifeless | jamesh: so is there anything we can do to help you [and all reviewers] allocate enough time ? | 08:29 |
lifeless | we can think of reviews in a RT os scheduling sense I guess | 08:31 |
jamesh | don't know. I should have been checking up on them more frequently | 08:31 |
BjornT | maybe having the pending-reviews script sending a daily reminder of your review queue would help? | 08:32 |
=== allenap [n=allenap@212.233.34.156] has joined #launchpad | ||
lifeless | would it be read? | 08:33 |
lifeless | and acted on? | 08:33 |
lifeless | alternatively, how about a per-reviewer subpage? | 08:33 |
BjornT | i would read it | 08:33 |
lifeless | do you find checking daily a problem at the moment? | 08:33 |
BjornT | and often people state that they didn't do some reviews since they forgot to check their queue status. | 08:34 |
lifeless | I'm in favour of this | 08:34 |
lifeless | can you take it to the .eu meeting | 08:34 |
BjornT | sure | 08:34 |
lifeless | see if it works for them as well? | 08:34 |
lifeless | I suggest it only mail if there are reviews to do | 08:35 |
spiv | +1 | 08:35 |
lifeless | jamesh: ? | 08:36 |
BjornT | yeah, i agree with sending mail only if there are reviews to do. makes it less likely for people to ignore the e-mails. | 08:36 |
jamesh | I suppose I could look at something like that. The alternative would be an Atom feed | 08:36 |
jamesh | not sure which people would prefer | 08:36 |
lifeless | jamesh: lets start with mail; its much the same machinery, and does not need any affirmative action on the reviewers behalf. | 08:37 |
jamesh | could you file a bug with the details of how it should work? | 08:37 |
lifeless | sure | 08:37 |
lifeless | how detailed do you want ? | 08:37 |
jamesh | what you want in the emails, when emails should be sent, etc | 08:38 |
jamesh | perhaps it'd be useful to know about needs-reply branches that have been modified since being moved to that state too | 08:38 |
lifeless | sure you don't want a spec ? | 08:38 |
lifeless | :0 | 08:38 |
jamesh | either a bug or spec would be fine | 08:39 |
lifeless | hmm | 08:39 |
lifeless | I wonder if we should automatically bump needs-review-with-conflicts down to needs-reply | 08:40 |
BjornT | i'm not so sure about that. i often review branches having only trivial conflicts. | 08:41 |
lifeless | yeah defer that thought | 08:41 |
lifeless | how does this sound | 08:43 |
lifeless | https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad-development-infrastructure/+bug/106936 | 08:43 |
ubotu | Malone bug 106936 in launchpad-development-infrastructure "daily review mails" [Undecided,Unconfirmed] | 08:43 |
=== bd_ [n=foo@donlanbj3.umeres.maine.edu] has left #launchpad [] | ||
BjornT | looks good for a first step. it'd be nice to include the description of the branch, and a link to the diff, but maybe it's not easy to get the description? | 08:46 |
jamesh | I'll have to ask how close the "reviews in launchpad" stuff is likely to be | 08:46 |
lifeless | indeed :) | 08:47 |
lifeless | however if we keep moving the goal posts :) | 08:47 |
lifeless | ... | 08:47 |
lifeless | anyhow | 08:47 |
=== lamont [i=lamont@nat/hp/x-cc3bc171ccc123d5] has joined #launchpad | ||
lifeless | * Urgent review requests (lifeless for .au) | 08:47 |
lifeless | so I wanted to raise this | 08:47 |
lifeless | currently there is no formal documentation on what dev's should do when something is urgent; | 08:48 |
=== mpt [n=mpt@canonical/launchpad/mpt] has joined #launchpad | ||
lifeless | its made clear its their responsbility, but I couldn't find anything saying 'ask around', or 'put it on pending reviews with a /!\ this is urgent marker', or ... | 08:48 |
lifeless | this came up because at the long weekend there was a branch for a critical hotfix that got lost | 08:50 |
lifeless | not due to anyone doing anything wrong | 08:50 |
lifeless | but it fell through the urgent cracks and got treated as normal | 08:50 |
ubotu | New bug: #106936 in launchpad-development-infrastructure "daily review mails" [Undecided,Unconfirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/106936 | 08:50 |
Mez | kiko / SteveA around ? (shipit stuff) | 08:50 |
lifeless | ok | 08:52 |
=== lifeless taps the mic | ||
=== neversfelde [n=chrman@nrbg-4db4413f.pool.einsundeins.de] has joined #launchpad | ||
BjornT | lifeless: maybe refine ProductionProcess, and add something to that document? | 08:53 |
lifeless | possibly | 08:53 |
lifeless | possibly WorkingWithReviews ? | 08:53 |
BjornT | well, anything urgent should be cherry picked. so it makes sense to have one document describing how to make urguent fixes. | 08:54 |
lifeless | good point | 08:54 |
lifeless | ok | 08:54 |
lifeless | who wants to do that ? :) | 08:54 |
BjornT | i don't think ProductionProcess is a good name for that document, though. | 08:54 |
lifeless | ok | 08:57 |
lifeless | I'll mail the list | 08:57 |
lifeless | any other business? | 08:57 |
lifeless | 5 | 08:59 |
BjornT | lifeless: what about training up new reviewers? | 08:59 |
=== lamont [i=lamont@nat/hp/x-c7d108e7f9b7a12d] has joined #launchpad | ||
BjornT | iirc, the last thing that was said, was that it should be discussed further at the next meeting | 08:59 |
lifeless | hmm, agenda has it for .eu meeting follow up - IIRC the feeling here was a buddy system for some reviews was sufficient. | 08:59 |
lifeless | ah | 09:00 |
lifeless | we deferred the main conversation | 09:00 |
lifeless | did you discuss in .eu time ? | 09:00 |
BjornT | it was discussed at the .eu meeting. it's in the meeting log for 2007-04-04 | 09:01 |
lifeless | ok | 09:01 |
lifeless | I like the 'Another variant on that is to have the new reviewer send the review to an experienced reviewer for comments, before sending it to the reviewee.' proposall | 09:02 |
lifeless | as its the simplest to implement immediately | 09:02 |
lifeless | Barry will be joining the ranks very soon - in fact once we agree on a training mechanism. | 09:02 |
lifeless | BjornT: looks like there wasn't a strong preference amongst the .eu crowd. Lets vote here: | 09:03 |
lifeless | is 'Another variant on that is to have the new reviewer send the review to an experienced reviewer for comments, before sending it to the reviewee.' a good start that we should go forward with ? | 09:03 |
spiv | That sounds fine to me (I'm happy with any variant on the basic idea of an established reviewer reviewing new reviews). | 09:04 |
BjornT | +1, since it's probably the easiest thing. | 09:04 |
BjornT | although, i think one important part is to have a document describing what a reviewer should look for in a diff. | 09:05 |
=== lamont [i=lamont@nat/hp/x-0ee76ba41a9ab98b] has joined #launchpad | ||
lifeless | BjornT: which is different from our coding standards how ? | 09:05 |
SteveA | design standards? | 09:08 |
BjornT | lifeless: surely a reviewer should look at more than the coding standard? for example, is there a spec, does the implementation follow the spec, is the code design reasonable, etc. | 09:08 |
lifeless | well, I mean to say that we have a set of standards that describe what developers should be producing, hopefully in quantitative terms. | 09:08 |
lifeless | I struggle to imagine anything that we would give as advice to a reviewer that isn't also good advice for the developer. | 09:09 |
BjornT | lifeless: agreed, that document should be required reading for new developers. | 09:10 |
lifeless | in which case, I argue that its not a reviewer centric document, its part of the '* standards' if you like. | 09:10 |
BjornT | currently, the best way of learning all the standards and requirements is to submit branches for review and learn from the review replies. | 09:11 |
jamesh | sounds good. We do want to encourage people to "self review" to an extent anyway ... | 09:11 |
jamesh | so they should know what to look for | 09:11 |
lifeless | I agree they should know what to look for | 09:12 |
BjornT | yeah, i don't argue for that it should be for reviewers only. any developer is a potentional reviewer :) | 09:12 |
=== lamont [i=lamont@nat/hp/x-5f2ba173ca77f099] has joined #launchpad | ||
lifeless | we currently have: | 09:13 |
lifeless | https://launchpad.canonical.com/TipsForReviewers | 09:13 |
lifeless | which has suggested reading for generalaties about review | 09:13 |
lifeless | https://launchpad.canonical.com/PreMergeReviews | 09:14 |
lifeless | has 'what are reviewers looking for' | 09:14 |
lifeless | which points to TipsForReviewers | 09:14 |
lifeless | which still has that unresolved 'all pillars' thing | 09:15 |
lifeless | anyhow | 09:15 |
lifeless | I'm +1 on documenting our design standards and so forth better. | 09:15 |
lifeless | I'm not at all convinced that the *primary audience* of such documentation is the review team. | 09:15 |
lifeless | I htink the primary audience is our developers; that the review team is responsible for feeding suggesting into the documentation. | 09:16 |
lifeless | ... | 09:16 |
lifeless | and enforcing it. | 09:16 |
BjornT | i agree. that document should be for both developers and reviewers. especially since developers are exepcted to do a self-review before submitting the branch for review. | 09:17 |
lifeless | SteveA: does this make sense to you? | 09:17 |
SteveA | I agree with developers doing a self-review before the review | 09:18 |
SteveA | and I agree that both things ought to involve reviewing the spec and the coding standards | 09:19 |
lifeless | I fear the butt | 09:20 |
=== zyga [n=zyga@ubuntu/member/zyga] has joined #launchpad | ||
lifeless | SteveA: was that the end of your statement ? | 09:22 |
=== raphink [n=raphink@ubuntu/member/raphink] has joined #launchpad | ||
lifeless | ok, looks like steve is awol | 09:25 |
lifeless | I agree with what Steve is saying | 09:25 |
lifeless | I dont think it contradicts my point | 09:25 |
lifeless | concrete proposal: lets add anything that comes up as 'this should have been looked for' to the current design standards docs | 09:27 |
lifeless | and if there isn't an appropriate document, add one at the time. | 09:27 |
=== lamont [i=lamont@nat/hp/x-93eaede51b1168ea] has joined #launchpad | ||
lifeless | jamesh: ^ | 09:27 |
lifeless | BjornT: ^ | 09:27 |
lifeless | spiv: ^ | 09:27 |
jamesh | sounds good | 09:28 |
spiv | I agree. | 09:28 |
=== sabdfl [n=sabdfl@ubuntu/member/pdpc.silver.sabdfl] has joined #launchpad | ||
BjornT | lifeless: what do you mean by 'this should have been looked for'? | 09:29 |
=== lamont [i=lamont@nat/hp/x-4fb06ad7ad5c9649] has joined #launchpad | ||
lifeless | BjornT: I mean, that when in a review or other discussion something is found that *should* have been picked up by a prior review, we document what it is that should have been looked for by said review. | 09:30 |
lifeless | whether it is a design issue, UI, CSXF or whatever. | 09:31 |
lifeless | start building this missing document base. | 09:31 |
BjornT | does a self-review count as a prior review? :) | 09:31 |
lifeless | separately it might be nice if a dev says 'I did not know to look for X' to also incorporate it into the same body of documentation. | 09:31 |
lifeless | yes, self-review does count | 09:31 |
BjornT | cool | 09:31 |
lifeless | ok | 09:32 |
lifeless | any other business ? | 09:32 |
lifeless | 1.5 hour review meeting meep. | 09:33 |
lifeless | still, we covered a lot | 09:33 |
lifeless | 5 | 09:33 |
lifeless | 4 | 09:33 |
lifeless | 3 | 09:33 |
lifeless | 2 | 09:33 |
lifeless | 1 | 09:33 |
lifeless | --- | 09:33 |
lifeless | I'll write this up into minutes shortly. Thanks all! | 09:33 |
=== lamont [i=lamont@nat/hp/x-7a4ebaa734d9dccd] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== schwuk [n=dave@ubuntu/member/schwuk] has joined #launchpad | ||
Theuni_ | hey | 09:50 |
Theuni_ | any admin around? | 09:50 |
=== lamont [i=lamont@nat/hp/x-a682af64a6095cc3] has joined #launchpad | ||
mthaddon | what can I help with Theuni_? | 09:54 |
Theuni_ | mthaddon: when importing the zope bugtracker, some milestone seems to have ended up in the wrong release series | 09:57 |
Theuni_ | i can't see any way to move that milestone to the correct series from the UI, so I guess I need some admin to help me do that :) | 09:57 |
Theuni_ | See https://launchpad.net/zope3/3.4/+milestones | 09:58 |
Theuni_ | It has a '3.3' milestone in there. That should go to the 3.3 release series ... | 09:58 |
mthaddon | ah, ok - different type of admin, I'm afraid :( | 09:58 |
=== lamont [i=lamont@nat/hp/x-a2517de5261f6a17] has joined #launchpad | ||
Theuni_ | ok, np. | 09:58 |
spiv | Theuni_: jamesh can probably help | 09:58 |
spiv | jamesh: ^ | 09:58 |
=== mrevell [n=matthew@canonical/launchpad/mrevell] has joined #launchpad | ||
jamesh | Theuni_: I don't think we have a mechanism to move milestones from the web UI at the moment. | 09:59 |
jamesh | stub or lifeless could probably do the moves though | 10:00 |
Theuni_ | :) | 10:00 |
=== Theuni_ holds the line | ||
jamesh | (I could figure out the SQL if needed) | 10:00 |
=== lamont [i=lamont@nat/hp/x-930f699c7d288154] has joined #launchpad | ||
jamesh | Theuni_: also, you should find a logo image for the zope3 product -- it will make all the zope3 pages on LP look a bit nicer :) | 10:02 |
Theuni_ | hmm. there's some kind of logo n the product homepage, but it looks blurry | 10:03 |
jamesh | the "Change branding" menu item lets you change things | 10:03 |
jamesh | http://www.zope.org/Images/zbutton might be a good choice after being resized slightly | 10:04 |
=== lamont [i=lamont@nat/hp/x-0facbf1072764f4d] has joined #launchpad | ||
Theuni_ | better now? :) | 10:08 |
=== jamesh_ [n=james@canonical/launchpad/jamesh] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== AlexLatchford [n=alex@82-44-193-109.cable.ubr07.haye.blueyonder.co.uk] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== niemeyer [n=niemeyer@yttrium.canonical.com] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== jkakar [n=jkakar@yttrium.canonical.com] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== mholthaus_ [n=mholthau@245-218.0-85.cust.bluewin.ch] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== mimilus [n=mimilus@ADijon-257-1-19-166.w86-204.abo.wanadoo.fr] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== jamesh_ is now known as jamesh | ||
=== mdz [n=mdz@yttrium.canonical.com] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== Spads [n=spacehob@unaffiliated/spads] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== Rinchen [n=joey@canonical/launchpad/rinchen] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== Gwaihir [n=Gwaihir@mail.foredil.it] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== zyga [n=zyga@ubuntu/member/zyga] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== sabdfl [n=sabdfl@ubuntu/member/pdpc.silver.sabdfl] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== zyga [n=zyga@ubuntu/member/zyga] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== Rinchen [n=joey@canonical/launchpad/rinchen] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== Bhaskar1 [n=Bhaskar1@202.79.37.177] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== jikanter [n=jordan@c-24-12-220-77.hsd1.il.comcast.net] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== allenap [n=allenap@212.233.34.156] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== kiko-afk is now known as kiko | ||
=== Spads [n=spacehob@unaffiliated/spads] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== stu1 [n=stub@ppp-58.8.12.154.revip2.asianet.co.th] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== kiko [n=kiko@canonical/launchpad/kiko] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== kiko [n=kiko@canonical/launchpad/kiko] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== sabdfl [n=sabdfl@ubuntu/member/pdpc.silver.sabdfl] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== kiko [n=kiko@canonical/launchpad/kiko] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== MrNOKIA1 [n=user@86.121.182.108] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== cprov [n=cprov@canonical/launchpad/cprov] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== TeTeT [n=spindler@modemcable178.77-70-69.static.videotron.ca] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== bquorning [n=bquornin@ip22.ds1-by.adsl.cybercity.dk] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== MrNOKIA1 is now known as MrNOKIA | ||
=== bquorning [n=bquornin@ip22.ds1-by.adsl.cybercity.dk] has left #launchpad [] | ||
=== MrNOKIA [n=user@unaffiliated/mrnokia] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== jkakar [n=jkakar@yttrium.canonical.com] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== thumper [n=tim@ordo.xlii.org] has joined #launchpad | ||
thumper | hi all | 01:30 |
=== thumper stretches | ||
kiko | hey thumper | 01:32 |
thumper | kiko: hi | 01:33 |
kiko | yawn. | 01:34 |
thumper | kiko: I'm with ddaa atm | 01:35 |
kiko | thumper, I know, Rinchen told me you would be there. that's great news! | 01:35 |
=== statik [n=emurphy@canonical/launchpad/statik] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== Zac_Charles [i=Zac_Char@ppp209-49.lns1.hba1.internode.on.net] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== Nafallo [n=nafallo@ubuntu/member/nafallo] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== jsgotangco [n=jsg123@ubuntu/member/jsgotangco] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== WaterSevenUb [n=WaterSev@azevedo.astro.up.pt] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== schwuk [n=dave@ubuntu/member/schwuk] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== dneary [n=dneary@mne69-9-88-163-116-163.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== RAOF [n=chris@60-242-199-65.tpgi.com.au] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== matsubara [n=matsubar@canonical/launchpad/matsubara] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== kiko is now known as kiko-afk | ||
statik | anyone know a browser that I can use on linux to sorta check for safari compatibility | 02:24 |
LarstiQ | webkit or khtml iirc | 02:25 |
statik | ta | 02:25 |
=== bigjools [n=ed@canonical/launchpad/bigjools] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== Hobbsee [n=Hobbsee@ubuntu/member/hobbsee] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== ddaa [n=david@canonical/launchpad/ddaa] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== WaterSevenUb [n=WaterSev@azevedo.astro.up.pt] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== salgado [n=salgado@canonical/launchpad/salgado] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== neversfelde [n=chrman@nrbg-4db443f1.pool.einsundeins.de] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== barry [n=barry@canonical/launchpad/barry] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== stub [n=stub@ppp-58.8.12.154.revip2.asianet.co.th] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== fabio [n=fabio@201.29.163.142] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== flacoste [n=francis@modemcable105.83-202-24.mc.videotron.ca] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== caravena [n=caravena@125-152-223-201.adsl.terra.cl] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== barry [n=barry@canonical/launchpad/barry] has joined #launchpad | ||
popey | aaargh, I have managed to link a bug to an incorrect external system, can I delete them? | 03:40 |
popey | bug 106996 | 03:40 |
ubotu | Malone bug 106996 in kopete "Kopete needs a method to block ICQ spammers" [Undecided,Unconfirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/106996 | 03:40 |
popey | should be linked to kde 57234 and 63839, but not the kde url and not the ATi one :( | 03:40 |
ubotu | KDE bug 57234 in general "messages from people not in contact list should be filtered." [Wishlist,New] http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57234 - Assigned to kopete-devel@kde.org | 03:41 |
ubotu | KDE bug 63839 in general "Easier way to block senders" [Wishlist,Resolved: fixed] http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63839 - Assigned to kopete-devel@kde.org | 03:41 |
popey | sorry | 03:41 |
popey | ooo, neat | 03:41 |
=== effie_jayx [n=l3ap@200.84.120.245] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== dungodung [n=felix@wikipedia/dungodung] has joined #launchpad | ||
popey | figured it out \o/ | 03:50 |
=== popey hugs launchpad | ||
=== effie_jayx [n=l3ap@200.84.120.245] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== effie_jayx [n=l3ap@200.84.120.245] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== _neversfelde [n=chrman@nrbg-4db443f1.pool.einsundeins.de] has joined #launchpad | ||
ubotu | New bug: #107001 in malone "some bug followups break threading" [Undecided,Unconfirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/107001 | 04:00 |
=== OgMaciel [n=omaciel@ubuntu/member/gnukemist] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== phanatic [n=phanatic@ubuntu/member/phanatic] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== pochu [n=emilio@ubuntu/member/pochu] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== oojah is now known as aquarioojah | ||
=== aquarioojah is now known as oojah | ||
=== gnomefre1k [n=gnomefre@adsl-144-154-3.rmo.bellsouth.net] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== WaterSevenUb [n=WaterSev@azevedo.astro.up.pt] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== effie_jayx [n=l3ap@190.37.175.250] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== kiko-afk is now known as kiko | ||
=== Rinchen [n=joey@canonical/launchpad/rinchen] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== phanatic [n=phanatic@ubuntu/member/phanatic] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== jsgotangco [n=jsg123@ubuntu/member/jsgotangco] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== cprov is now known as cprov-lunch | ||
=== sabdfl [n=sabdfl@ubuntu/member/pdpc.silver.sabdfl] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== alefteris [n=alefteri@unaffiliated/alefteris] has joined #launchpad | ||
alefteris | hi all! is it possible to mass export po files from rosseta? | 05:56 |
kiko | alefteris, for a certain project? sure. | 05:57 |
alefteris | how can someone do that? | 05:58 |
alefteris | fir example for the gnome packages | 05:58 |
kiko | not for a group of projects. | 05:58 |
kiko | and you said "packages" so perhaps you're talking about distro packages, not projects. | 05:58 |
=== lamont [i=lamont@nat/hp/x-24f9c20f67f8b6b7] has joined #launchpad | ||
alefteris | kiko, how is the merging with upstream feature working then? can you please explain a bit? :) | 06:00 |
ubotu | New bug: #107027 in launchpad "Assinging a bug re-sends it to people who have already received it" [Undecided,Unconfirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/107027 | 06:01 |
kiko | alefteris, I think it has changed. danilos? | 06:01 |
danilos | alefteris: what 'merging with upstream' feature are you talking about? | 06:02 |
kiko | danilos, I think he wants to know how strings from distro translations are reused in the project context. | 06:03 |
alefteris | is there anyway the translations from rosseta to be used by the upstream project, ex gnome? | 06:03 |
=== superm1 [n=superm1@ubuntu/member/superm1] has joined #launchpad | ||
danilos | alefteris: sure, but you can export them only per-package, eg. you go to https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/feisty/+source/gnome-desktop/+pots/gnome-desktop-2.0/ and choose 'Download translations' | 06:04 |
kiko | oh. | 06:05 |
alefteris | ok thats what i wanted to ask.. so there is no mass export of all gnome packages thing? | 06:05 |
Lumiere | is there a way to make your default view of a projects bugs to be bugs.launchpad.net/<project>/+bugs | 06:06 |
Lumiere | instead of bugs.launchpad.net/<project>/ | 06:06 |
danilos | alefteris: no, but what do you want to use that for? or do you actually want a single-language mass-export? | 06:06 |
alefteris | the latter | 06:07 |
danilos | alefteris: ah, ok, that makes sense, but we don't have it at the moment; what you *can* do, however, is download a language pack which is regenerated daily and contains all the gnome translations (including some others) | 06:07 |
alefteris | a ok | 06:08 |
alefteris | thanks for you answers danilos kiko :) | 06:08 |
danilos | alefteris: there's a separate language pack for GNOME (strangely named "language-pack-gnome-LANGCODE" :), so you can use that | 06:09 |
alefteris | ok, also another question: is there a meta package that gets installed when you chooso to install the language support for a spesific language from System -> System managment-> languge support? | 06:11 |
alefteris | sorry found it :) | 06:20 |
=== zyga [n=zyga@ubuntu/member/zyga] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch | ||
=== cprov-lunch is now known as cprov | ||
=== matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara | ||
=== kiko is now known as kiko-fud | ||
=== silwol [n=silwol@teacheradsl245.eduhi.at] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== kjcole [n=kjcole@ubuntu/member/kjcole] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== silwol [n=silwol@teacheradsl245.eduhi.at] has left #launchpad [] | ||
=== flacoste is now known as flacoste_lunch | ||
=== jamesh [n=james@canonical/launchpad/jamesh] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== gmt [n=gentoo@host162-165.pool80183.interbusiness.it] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk | ||
=== kjcole [n=kjcole@ubuntu/member/kjcole] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== Loevborg [n=loevborg@dslb-088-064-090-140.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #launchpad | ||
Loevborg | Why doesn't searching for "interface eth0 is being released" reveal https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/102716? | 07:58 |
ubotu | Malone bug 102716 in network-manager "NetworkManager fails to bring up wired interface after resume" [Undecided,Unconfirmed] | 07:58 |
Loevborg | Does launchpad bug search not include comments? | 07:59 |
=== alefteris [n=alefteri@unaffiliated/alefteris] has left #launchpad [""] | ||
salgado | Loevborg, no, it doesn't | 08:01 |
Loevborg | it really, _really should | 08:01 |
Loevborg | (at the very least optionally) | 08:02 |
Loevborg | the submitter often adds important information, such as error messages, in a 2nd comment | 08:02 |
Loevborg | Searching by error message is really one of the most logical ways to find a bug. | 08:02 |
salgado | Loevborg, bug 70665 seems to be about that | 08:03 |
ubotu | Malone bug 70665 in malone "Allow searching in comments" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/70665 - Assigned to Bjrn Tillenius (bjornt) | 08:03 |
Loevborg | that's right | 08:04 |
Loevborg | thanks | 08:04 |
salgado | Loevborg, there seems to be a fix for it already. you can subscribe to be notified when it gets rolled out to production | 08:04 |
Loevborg | pity that bug's "fixed" for 1 month | 08:05 |
Loevborg | but yes, I'll subscribe to the bug, thanks | 08:06 |
=== Spads [n=spacehob@unaffiliated/spads] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== Kmos [n=gothicx@unaffiliated/kmos] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== sabdfl [n=sabdfl@ubuntu/member/pdpc.silver.sabdfl] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== flacoste_lunch is now known as flacoste | ||
=== fabio [n=fabio@201.29.163.142] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== matsubara-afk is now known as matsubara | ||
=== kalikiana [n=kalikian@xdsl-87-78-118-83.netcologne.de] has joined #launchpad | ||
kalikiana | Arg, when will the font be fixed I wonder? | 08:28 |
=== neversfelde [n=chrman@nrbg-4db443f1.pool.einsundeins.de] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== kjcole [n=kjcole@ubuntu/member/kjcole] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== kiko-fud is now known as kiko | ||
=== daq4th [n=darkness@netstation-005.cafe.zSeries.org] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== Rinchen [n=joey@canonical/launchpad/rinchen] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== tokj [n=tk@151.82.2.2] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== mholthaus_ [n=mholthau@178.177.79.83.cust.bluewin.ch] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== kalikiana is now known as kalikiana|away | ||
=== jkakar_ [n=jkakar@yttrium.canonical.com] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== doko [n=doko@dslb-088-073-122-210.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== sabdfl [n=sabdfl@ubuntu/member/pdpc.silver.sabdfl] has joined #launchpad | ||
Kmos | bug 107062 | 09:30 |
ubotu | Malone bug 107062 in kubuntu-docs "Linux.org is hurting Linux; don't recommend it" [Wishlist,Needs info] https://launchpad.net/bugs/107062 - Assigned to Richard Johnson (nixternal) | 09:30 |
Kmos | lol | 09:30 |
=== WaterSevenUb [n=WaterSev@azevedo.astro.up.pt] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== superm1 [n=superm1@ubuntu/member/superm1] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== kiko [n=kiko@200-171-140-32.dsl.telesp.net.br] has joined #launchpad | ||
OgMaciel | danilos: ping | 09:35 |
=== mimilus [n=mimilus@ADijon-257-1-19-166.w86-204.abo.wanadoo.fr] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== kalikiana|away is now known as kalikiana | ||
nixternal | Kmos: haha, you liked that one | 09:49 |
=== kalikiana [n=kalikian@xdsl-87-78-118-83.netcologne.de] has left #launchpad [""And] | ||
ubotu | New bug: #107077 in launchpad "database/productrelease.py has duplicate lines causing two queries" [Undecided,Unconfirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/107077 | 09:50 |
Kmos | nixternal :) | 09:52 |
pochu | Kmos, nixternal: what about http://www.whylinuxisbetter.net/ :) | 09:53 |
Kmos | hehe | 09:53 |
Kmos | myownlinuxdomain.com :D | 09:54 |
nixternal | there are a couple of good ones that I will list in the future, but removing linux.org because someones blog says it is evil is nuts | 09:54 |
Kmos | pochu: that one is nice | 09:54 |
Kmos | nixternal: right.. it's a big LOL :) | 09:54 |
pochu | :-) | 09:55 |
OgMaciel | mdke: hey, do you subscribe to the rosetta mailing list by any chance? | 09:56 |
=== phanatic [n=phanatic@ubuntu/member/phanatic] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== dneary [n=dneary@mne69-9-88-163-116-163.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== zwnj [n=behnam@213.207.210.231] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== fabio [n=fabio@201.29.163.142] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== john_ [n=john@85.112.67.32] has joined #launchpad | ||
john_ | Hey Guys. Congrats on the launch. I have a strange question. Why did launchpad use Zope in the first place? Is there a write up of this somewhere? I am interested in how the project was affected by this decision, good or bad. | 10:22 |
=== stgraber [n=stgraber@ubuntu/member/stgraber] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== Gwaihir [n=Gwaihir@ubuntu/member/gwaihir] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== sabdfl is now known as sabdfl-nap | ||
=== Spads [n=spacehob@unaffiliated/spads] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== sabdfl [n=sabdfl@ubuntu/member/pdpc.silver.sabdfl] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== mdke [n=matt@212-139-102-47.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== ok [n=mholthau@178.177.79.83.cust.bluewin.ch] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== sinzui [n=sinzui@pool-70-17-92-27.res.east.verizon.net] has joined #launchpad | ||
=== superm1 [n=superm1@ubuntu/member/superm1] has joined #launchpad |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!