[06:20] <holycow> hi guys
[06:20] <holycow> i'm running ubuntu on a core duo laptop and i'm getting intermittent freezes
[06:21] <holycow> i'm trying to track down the issue and so far syslog seems to have some stuff about ata2 port being slow and then doing some reinitializing
[06:22] <holycow> that might explain it but just curious if there is anything more i can do to track down this issue before posting a bug?
[06:22] <holycow> oh look there it is again
[06:23] <holycow> ata2 too slow to respond
[06:23] <holycow> soft resetting port
[06:23] <holycow> *hmm*
[06:23] <holycow> tips?
[07:29] <fabbione> BenC, kylem: please take a look at 197619
[07:29] <fabbione> ops
[07:29] <fabbione> 107619
[07:31] <BenC> fabbione: I've been rejected
[07:31] <BenC> "Not allowed here"
[07:31] <fabbione> BenC: ops.. 
[07:31] <fabbione> sorry about that.. just one sec
[07:32] <fabbione> BenC: you should be good now
[07:33] <BenC> fabbione: looks like something for kyle, but he's sick today
[07:34] <BenC> fabbione: Can you email him a reminder?
[07:34] <fabbione> yeps.. ok.. i did check already and the code didn't change from release
[07:34] <fabbione> yes of course
[07:39] <pkl_> and you'll have to add kyle to the users allowed to access it, but whatever you did, didn't allow me in.
[07:40] <pkl_> but -> because
[07:49] <fabbione> pkl_: already done with kyle
[07:54] <pkl_> can I have a look at it, or it too secret
[07:56] <fabbione> pkl_: sure.. what's your LP id?
[07:56] <pkl_> plougher
[07:58] <pkl_> no, phillip-lougher
[07:58] <fabbione> make up your mind :)
[07:58] <fabbione> done
[08:03] <zul> congrats guys
[11:22] <BenC> dpkg-deb: building package `linux-image-2.6.22-1-generic' in `../linux-image-2.6.22-1-generic_2.6.22-1.1_i386.deb'.
[11:22] <BenC> first step of the new build system...done
[11:22] <Nafallo> nice :-)
[11:23] <BenC> it's going to be so sweet, instead of setting flavours=, you just do things like "fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch-FLAVOUR" where FLAVOUR is like generic or whatever
[11:24] <BenC> there's {prepare,build,install,binary}-arch-% targets for each flavour
[11:24] <Nafallo> will I get 22 when gutsy opens? :-)
[11:28] <BenC> Probably wont show up for a week or two
[11:29] <Nafallo> feels odd running something stable :-)
[11:47] <bdmurray> BenC: ping
[11:47] <BenC> bdmurray: yo
[11:48] <bdmurray> Maybe this should be a kernel team discussion but I was curious about setting the importance of network adapter bugs as medium
[11:48] <BenC> do you have an example?
[11:49] <bdmurray> Not a specific one, but the general rule is to set network adapter ones as medium.
[11:49] <BenC> it all depends on the bug
[11:50] <bdmurray> makes sense
[11:50] <BenC> for ethernet adapters, the issue is that even if a specific model is broken, it's easy for users to toss another $5 10/100 adapter in there
[11:51] <BenC> if we're talking about bringing down the system (data loss, total lockups) then we can mark it high
[11:51] <BenC> IMO, things like wireless adapters on laptops not working should get high, but that's because most times they can't easily fix it (plus for wireless laptop cards, a bug in the driver affects a lot of ppl)
[11:52] <BenC> there's only like 6 major drivers for wireless, but there's like over 100 ethernet drivers
[11:53] <bdmurray> The wireless makes sense
[11:56] <jb-home> bdmurray: I'm avoiding the feeling of running something stable by not doing the last apt-get upgrade. =)
[11:56] <jb-home> I'll wait until gusty opens.
[11:56] <Nafallo> jb-home: :-)
[11:56] <jb-home> Err, Nafallo.  Wichever of you spoke.
[11:56] <jb-home> I should *really* be asleep now.
[11:56] <jb-home> =)
[11:57] <Nafallo> :-)
[11:59] <bdmurray> BenC: do you think it is worth qualifying at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance
[12:00] <BenC> bdmurray: Not sure...maybe something more specific in KernelTeam wiki?
[12:03] <jb-home> BenC: We have a good chunk of an hppa/feisty archive, except you need to use a non-Ubuntu kernel (binutils trouble)
[12:03] <jb-home> It builds but won't boot.
[12:03] <jb-home> BenC: What's your box?
[12:04] <jb-home> If it's an a500 I have a kernel that will work for you, if you dont mind keeping it building as part of your tests.
[12:12] <BenC> jb-home: we have a fix for hppa in ubuntu-feisty.git
[12:13] <BenC> jb-home: I do have an a500, I just need to boot it so I can start building again
[12:13] <BenC> jb-home: first post-release upload we do, hppa will get fixed up
[12:13] <jb-home> BenC: http://people.ubuntu.com/~jbailey/hppa/a500/linux-2.6.21-rc2_2.6.21-rc2_hppa.deb
[12:14] <jb-home> BenC: That's build with make deb-pkg from Kyle's merge tree.
[12:14] <BenC> jb-home: ok
[12:14] <jb-home> Right, the fix you have there allows it to build, but not to boot.
[12:14] <jb-home> The boot failure is a binutils bug.
[12:15] <jb-home> But that way at least we'll have update linux-libc-dev and such.
[12:15] <jb-home> I'm going to work on getting it booting pretty quick.  We're getting the userspace bits sorted out so that at least that can go on with a minimum of fuss.
[12:16] <jb-home> Also, you now probably need linux32 when building things, like on sparc/ppc.