[12:44] you can also package final as rc2 [12:44] e.g. by choosig proper name in changelog and rename downloaded tarball properly e.g. 1.99.... [12:45] but no need to hurry [12:45] its probably the same [12:45] anyway [12:45] ill worry about that tomorrow or later. === gnomefreak gone for night [12:49] sure [12:49] night [12:50] me asleep how too [02:37] @ france [02:37] @now france [02:39] @now france [02:55] remind me how much i hate these long ass nights [03:05] @now paris [03:05] Current time in Europe/Paris: April 19 2007, 03:05:23 - Next meeting: Development Team in 13 hours 54 minutes === DarkMageZ [n=richard@ppp6-91.lns4.syd7.internode.on.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === asac_ [n=asac@debian/developer/asac] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === hjmf [n=hjmf@6.Red-88-25-28.staticIP.rima-tde.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [11:18] ok i am going through major upgrade of my gateway server here ... if i never come up you know that sarge->etch upgrade did kill me :) === AlexLatchford [n=alex@82-44-193-109.cable.ubr07.haye.blueyonder.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [01:25] How do I retrace a crash report on my own system? [01:25] getting a segfault when running a java applet [01:46] AlexLatchford: use either apport-retrace or gdb with debugging packages installed [01:46] for the later: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs#head-523978f1f3009b1b57ef020d5e3ff8674e737f41 [01:52] ta [01:54] asac: I did that migration (was sid->etch) last weekend and it worked like a charm! :) [01:55] ofcourse from sid to etch was a full reinstall of system related files [01:55] I'll never go again to unstable on the server :) [02:11] sorry for the down time repos should be back up now [02:12] with hofully fixed firefox [02:15] someone ping me when he gets back if he does === ActiveOne [n=idleone@c-69-249-136-37.hsd1.pa.comcast.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === ActiveOne [n=idleone@c-69-249-136-37.hsd1.pa.comcast.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [03:16] gnomefreak: have you packaged thunderbird 2.0? If so you might want to answer Bug #107691 ;) [03:16] Malone bug 107691 in mozilla-thunderbird "thunderbird 2.0 is out of the oven" [Wishlist,Unconfirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/107691 [03:16] ty [03:16] k ) [03:16] :) [03:19] i didnt give repo yet because i might be upgrading it soon and dont want them to try and get it before hand [03:22] when I have some time I have to test your builds, promised :) [03:22] s/I/I'll/g [03:24] :) take your time there is a problem with firefox2.0.0.3 in my repos atm [04:01] gnomefreak, I did dist-upgrade and got an upgrade for firefox and firefox-gnome-support or something like that but now my IceApe wont startup :/ [04:01] ideinstall libnspr4-0d [04:01] IdleOne: install ^^^ [04:02] ok [04:02] iceape hasnt changed here [04:03] btw when we going to stop getting the untrusted package warnings? [04:03] the problem with firefox atm is its not grabbing that package as a depend and it should. but since the new packaging of firefox its a bit different than adding a depend [04:03] IdleOne: nothing atm [04:03] that will hopfully be fixed shortly [04:03] shortly == 2 weeks or so [04:04] ok cool. I know you are working hard on this and it isnt easy. thanks for the hard work you guys do [04:05] btw thanks for the hint on libnspr4-0d fixed my iceape issue [04:05] yw. i would like to get firefox fixed thunderbid updated and gutsy chroot and repo open than ill worry about key ;) === gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam === asac [n=asac@debian/developer/asac] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [05:28] asac: firefox still doesnt grab libnspr-0d and we need to make mozilla-thunderbird upgrade to thunderbird as it doesnt do it now. [05:29] damn this upgrade costed my about half the day [05:29] im not saying today (since i have alot of work to do on someones pc [05:29] asac: it fudged system? [05:29] what version has mozilla-thunderbird [05:29] is there an epoch ? [05:29] no ... network cards switched === gnomefreak doesnt know what an epoch is [05:29] e.g. what was eth0 because eth1 [05:29] ah [05:29] and other way around [05:30] that can burn up hours [05:30] then there was some wierd thing about setting broadcast address in interfaces [05:30] destroying the routing [05:30] problem was the system has no monitor [05:30] mozilla-thunderbird in feisty 1.5.0.10 i think to the 1.99-rc1 [05:30] it depends on thunderbird but thunderbirdd wont be installed [05:31] is there a typo somewhere? [05:31] no [05:31] not that i saw [05:31] but you can install by hand (e.g. mozilla-thunderbird + thunderbird) [05:31] ? [05:31] i installed thunderbird by hand [05:32] i can install mozilla-thunderbird [05:32] by hand [05:32] gnomefreak: there is no thunderbird [05:32] in your archive [05:32] ah sorry [05:32] :) [05:32] sure there is === gnomefreak just installed it ;) [05:33] i have to do lots of clean ups ... will try to figure out [05:33] when installing thunderbird The following packages will be REMOVED: language-support-en mozilla-thunderbird mozilla-thunderbird-enigmail mozilla-thunderbird-inspector mozilla-thunderbird-typeaheadfind thunderbird-locale-en-gb [05:33] if i have a fix ... i will push to bzr [05:33] ok [05:33] yes [05:33] take your time ill be out most of the day [05:33] that is because of locales [05:33] you won't upgrade automatically because of that [05:33] ah might be [05:33] so no problem [05:33] as long as it upgrades in chroot when no locales are installed [05:33] then good [05:34] cool and i dont know the problem with firefox other than its not grabbing the needed package [05:34] ok === gnomefreak didnt try in chroot [05:34] does it grab libnss3 ? [05:34] or doesn't depend on any? [05:34] not sure [05:34] it depends on libnss3 so should grab it [05:34] ^^ in control [05:35] but no mention of libnspr4-0d in control [05:35] let me downgrade and try firefox without libnss [05:35] hmm [05:36] it has libnss3-0d [05:36] thats why i was thinking of adding libnspr4-0d to depedns list [05:37] its the quick fix if shlibs should grab it and its not (i couldnt find where that is defined on what shlib looks) [05:37] yes [05:37] i see the problem [05:37] nspr needs an epoch [05:37] add a 1: before the version of nspr in changelog [05:37] i will create a branch for that [05:38] debian hasn't this problem so they don't need the epoch [05:38] hmmm [05:38] bullshit [05:38] for nss and nspr? [05:39] gnomefreak: there should be a transitional package libnspr-dev [05:39] produces [05:39] produced [05:39] when building nspr [05:39] where is it? [05:39] its not in your archive [05:39] whats the name of it [05:39] libnspr-dev [05:39] thats not in repo? [05:40] there are libnspr4-dev libnspr-dev [05:40] latter is not in your repo [05:40] at least apt-cache show doesn't show it [05:40] it didnt build on [05:40] one [05:40] looking in the folder [05:40] libnspr4-dev is only -dev file in there [05:41] s/file/package [05:41] nss didnt build one either (if that is a problem) [05:42] control file doesnt list one (should it?) [05:43] ok got yes [05:43] right [05:43] i am looking [05:43] will take some time i guess [05:43] have to do house cleaning now ... and then talk to customer [05:44] thats file i have to go anyway [05:44] s/file/fine [05:44] ill cu later === IdleOne [n=idleone@unaffiliated/idleone] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [06:49] gnomefreak: what depends does firefox have on libnss3-0d ... which version is shown for you? [06:50] there might be some confusion as there exist libnspr4-dev and libnss3-dev in universe [06:50] those are from xulrunner and are version 1.8.xx [06:50] you have to be sure that you build with your latest libs [06:50] : [06:50] its version 4.4.6 or something [06:51] i will add a >= 4.0 to build-depends so it gets more safe ... but it should work if you build with 4.4 [07:45] hmm [07:45] somehow libnss3-0d has not the libnspr4-0d dependency it should have [08:21] build-deps are libnss3-dev, libnspr4-dev i will look at reg deps [08:22] libnss3-0d (>= 1.8.0.10) is it [08:36] i found the bug [08:37] ok [08:45] oh adn thunderbird needs an icon [08:45] guess i could see if they were included [08:48] yeah [08:48] easy enough :) [08:49] i have some pretty cool mozilla icons that i like (thinks thunderbirds can be a bit different though) [08:52] looks like its gonna be a week or so before i can build gutsy chroot === AlexLatchford [n=alex@82-44-193-109.cable.ubr07.haye.blueyonder.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [09:09] ok [09:09] pushing [09:09] you need to respin everything :) [09:09] first libnspr4 [09:09] then libnss [09:10] gnomefreak: ^^ [09:10] you just need to update nspr from bzr [09:11] those the only 2 for respin firefox and freinds too? [09:12] right [09:12] you are lucky [09:12] :) [09:12] just need to respin nspr and nss [09:12] oh ok [09:12] firefox already has libnss as dependency [09:12] which will now pull in libnspr4-0d [09:12] ok cool :) [09:12] anyway ... eventually firefox should be respun ... but that can probably wait till next update [09:13] gnomefreak: just do a bzr pull [09:13] bzr merge? [09:13] if you do merge you always would need to commit afterwards [09:13] oh [09:13] pull is better if you don't do checkins on your own [09:14] it automatically commits stuff [09:14] to your local branch [09:15] ok cool === IdleOne [n=idleone@c-69-249-136-37.hsd1.pa.comcast.net] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [09:16] no changes to nss? [09:20] no [09:20] problem is due to nspr only [09:20] k [09:21] no need to update-orig? [09:23] its building [09:23] ill have them uploaded my morning [09:23] s/my/by [09:24] grr.. fucking openoffice [09:25] /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libspell680li.so: undefined symbol: _ZN8Hunspell5spellEPKc [09:25] need to roll back libhunspell.. [09:30] roll back i doubt but honestly OO.o is a bitch to build from what i hear [09:30] hmmm our hunspell causing this? [09:30] probably just a respin [09:30] with new hunspell [09:30] give it a try :-D [09:30] takes a few hours i guess though [09:30] of course ;) [09:30] give me more than a few hours please [09:31] shit [09:31] nvm its all good [09:31] gnomefreak: please push nspr and nss :) [09:31] then i can finally spin [09:31] asac: working on it [09:31] :) [09:31] good [09:32] nspr version is already good [09:32] no need to change changelog [09:32] i already did that [09:32] for mozillateam [09:32] i saw that should i push nss to mt2? [09:32] hmm, you guys screwed my OOo.. *evils* [09:32] hint testing repo [09:32] :P [09:32] :) [09:32] yeah suppose [09:33] no [09:33] I wasn;t aware that hunspell was used across, the lot.. but meh oh well [09:33] why do you ask gnomefreak ... i just told "no need to change" ... :) [09:33] i know :( [09:33] :-P [09:33] im doing like 15 things at once [09:33] yeah ... multitasking [09:34] AlexLatchford: previously all linked statically [09:34] There an easy to rollback linhunspell? [09:34] easy way* [09:34] hmmmm nspr doesnt need libnspr4-dev to build [09:35] AlexLatchford: is ther libhunspell somewhere in /usr/lib/openoffice/ [09:35] ? [09:35] gnomefreak: hey ... makes sense, right? [09:35] it produces it [09:35] again nvm wrong chroot [09:35] ok [09:37] Dont think so [09:37] http://groups.google.co.uk/group/linux.debian.bugs.dist/browse_thread/thread/6bb585843ef36dc0/455102af44fafff7?lnk=gst&q=%23416711&rnum=1#455102af44fafff7 [09:37] Same error message I am receiving though [09:38] interesting [09:39] did we include inofficial hunspell? [09:39] apparently [09:39] AlexLatchford: you see what version is currently in archive? [09:39] 1.1.5.-6 [09:39] in feisty? [09:39] 1.1.5-6 in my repo [09:40] yes [09:40] 1.1.4-7 [09:40] in feisty repo [09:40] ah okay [09:40] thats bad [09:40] So it is a Mozilla Specific bug [09:40] we included an inoffical version and now debian maintainer did not bump library version [09:40] thus it goes unseen [09:40] it could be yes since they all need to be built on new hunspell [09:41] AlexLatchford: nothing mozilla specific [09:41] Hmm okay.. [09:41] once libhunspell is synched to gutsy openoffice need a respin [09:41] So 2.0.0.3-mt2 needs 1.1.5-6? [09:41] or 3.x? [09:42] gnomefreak: did it fail to build with feisty hunspell? [09:42] i guess it should build against 1.1.4 as well [09:42] did what fail to build with fesitys? [09:42] i wasn't aware that we shipped the inofficial build as official in feisty [09:43] 1.1.4-7 == unofficial? [09:43] gnomefreak: why did we build latest hunspell on our own? because there was a versioned build-depends right? [09:43] yes i think so [09:43] hmmm ... i guess we could build for latest feisty version as well [09:43] which is not true for debian [09:43] as it never had 1.1.4 [09:43] repo is going down for a few [09:43] k [09:46] So is there a way tonight I can get my OOo back? [09:47] install feistys version by using apt-get isntall hunspell=1.4... whatever it is [09:47] ta [09:47] as soon as asac tells me what it is ill respin it if that will fix anything [09:47] :) [09:47] im uploading nss stuff atm [09:47] (I really am like a Guinea pig) [09:48] Good Job bud :) === gnomefreak hasnt tried OO.o:( [09:48] try it [09:48] after typing anything it should crash [09:48] ty sorry for so many issues but we will get them worked out asap [09:48] no problems bud, I currently am not doing much else [09:48] may as well help test [09:49] this huspell issue will be fixed in gutsy as everyone will be using same version [09:49] yeah sure [09:49] Was that version needed for the 2.x or 3.x line of firefox? === gnomefreak not thrilled at the toolchain in gutsy (what is talked about) [09:50] 2.0 i think [09:50] gnomefreak: either we should respin openoffice [09:50] 3.0 should be on something else but would have to look in changelog [09:50] or we should respin firefox with current feisty hunspell [09:50] you choose :) [09:50] i guess better respin with current feisty [09:50] at least for feisty repo [09:50] well that is screwed either way [09:51] firefox in testing repo == built on hunspell (was whole point of adding it?) [09:51] OO.o is a bitch === gnomefreak never tried it personally [09:52] :) [09:52] well no you added other stuff to ff in testing repo like patch system [09:52] right? [09:53] libhunspell-1.1-0 (>= 1.1.5-1) not good [09:53] thats iceape [09:53] i would have to rebuild everything with feistys version [09:53] yes ... thats the reason why [09:53] you can use feisty version in there [09:53] e.g. 1.1.4-someting [09:53] yeah [09:54] then remove hunspell from your archive [09:54] just change control file i hope [09:54] and respin ffox + iceape + tbird :) [09:54] yes change control for iceape [09:54] ffox should have unversioned dependency i guess [09:54] can i unversion iceape adn tb? [09:55] Build-Depends? [09:55] although it doesnt matter [09:55] no please use version that is currently in feisty as lower bound [09:55] no depends [09:55] ok [09:55] don't do anything in depends [09:56] there should be no reference in debian/control to hunspell ... except for build-depends, right? [09:56] not looking right now but give me a minute ill let you know [09:57] your right [09:57] https://launchpad.net/~jonzep [09:57] he is in mozillateam [09:57] now people that use repo need to remove hunspell/install feistys version [09:57] haven't seen anything from him [09:57] but he has high karma [09:58] yeah [09:58] but thats not a problem === gnomefreak doesnt know him [10:00] ok ill rebuild everything and pull hunspell from repos? [10:01] does that sound like best way? [10:02] well i think its best this way as long as you agree [10:04] woops OOo fixed [10:04] (rolled back libhunspell) [10:04] woop even [10:07] AlexLatchford: it will be fixed everything will depend on the version you now have installed [10:08] coolio [10:09] at least I still have the data [10:09] thought the file I was working on was corrupt [10:09] is a bit of coursework, 82 pages long thus far lol [10:09] removed doing all the release shit now [10:09] cool cool [10:09] will rebuild ff first [10:10] hopfully will have atleast ff done tonight [10:10] man you are a work horse [10:11] if there is anything I can do, gimme a shout.. [10:11] (I can usually follow instructions :)) [10:13] asac: repo should be up and ready for you. you had wanted nss and nspr for something [10:15] yes [10:15] i will spin all now [10:16] ok [10:16] im downgrading huspell to respin [10:16] good [10:16] im bumping mt versions on the packages up one === gnomefreak needs to keep track of all these buildfs [10:17] ubuntu repos are slow as shit still [10:20] libhunspell-dev (>= 1.1.4-7) is now depends on iceape [10:24] than again there is a good change it wont be done tonight === gnomefreak wonders what kind of lag i will have running to builds at once [10:36] im gonna try 2 builds at once so to cut down on lag im gonna walk away from pc [10:37] there iceape and ff 2.0.0.3 started to build [10:38] cu [10:40] AlexLatchford: btw no thunderbird doesnt touch your profile so everything stays. you may want to find icon in /usr/share/thunderbird/icons you should beable to copy one to /usr/share/pixmaps with sudo and use it :) [10:40] you will need icon for launcher on panel if you use one. change command to launch to thunderbird [10:41] and i have enigmail for it just not sure how to build from xpi (dont htink i can) [10:42] :) [10:42] I will give it a spin sometime tomorrow then [10:42] yeah wait for me to rebuild it [10:42] ill let you know when [10:47] i would like to get the transition smoother if possible and maybe upgrade it to final release if asac thinks we can [10:48] that would entail adding locales :( [10:50] anyway im off for now i got both building [11:11] gnomefreak: looks like you have messed up iceape build again [11:11] you did not build orig.tar.gz [11:11] diff.gz [11:11] huh? [11:11] sure i did [11:12] ok i wait till it finishes [11:12] im building mt6 atm but it paused at dpkg-source: building iceape using existing iceape_1.1.1.orig.tar.gz [11:12] dpkg-source: building iceape in iceape_1.1.1-3.mt6.diff.gz [11:12] for a while [11:12] yes [11:12] sorry [11:13] its all fine [11:13] its mt5 though [11:13] yeah im running mt6 for the huspell change [11:14] hmm ... but firefox is fine, right? [11:14] then i will go ffox [11:14] mt2 [11:14] and -trunk [11:14] brb gonna restart irssi so i can get channels in order. i havent rebuilt trunk im re running firefox with old hunspall installed [11:14] should i rebuild trunk? [11:16] only things that have been done so fare have been rebuilt uploaded nss nspr and pulled hunspell out of repos [11:16] far* [11:16] brb === gnomefreak [n=gnomefre@ubuntu/member/gnomefreak] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [11:22] no -trunk has not yet changed [11:22] ok === IdleOne [n=idleone@unaffiliated/idleone] has joined #ubuntu-mozillateam [12:05] gnomefreak: are all these in revision control, eg bzr branches? [12:06] ajmitch: ther eis a branch for rc1 === gnomefreak doesnt have any cpu left to do much with atm [12:06] AlexLatchford: Admiral_Chicago are either of you here? [12:06] Yep [12:07] AlexLatchford: if you get time can you update https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ThunderbirdNewVersion for 2.0 [12:07] if tb2 will use mozldap 6.x, it'd be better to use it in a separate package (which I've done) [12:07] gnomefreak: will add to the todo list [12:07] ty [12:08] Added. [12:08] as well as svrcore, but I can't recall what else uses that [12:09] i will talk to asac about it in morning, he makes final call on it. [12:10] he should be sleeping if not should be soon (hint stop working late if you can) [12:10] this will be my last late night for a while they are burning me out [12:11] AlexLatchford: ty [12:11] gnomefreak: I will try to get to it over the weekend [12:13] ajmitch: so you have mozldap source package ready? [12:14] somewhere in bzr? [12:14] AlexLatchford: when ever its not important i was asked about it though and it doesnt look like i will get to it this week [12:14] excluding minor things like debian/copyright & some useful descriptions, sure [12:14] not in bzr yet though it should be [12:15] not ITP'd yet, I really should get onto that as well [12:16] asac: would svrcore be useful as well? [12:16] ajmitch: you/we need to fix thunderbird code as welll ... looks not like you can configure it to use system mozldap that easily [12:16] wonderful [12:16] at least mozldap uses pkg-config (borrowed from fedora) [12:16] wonderful? thought its bad news :) [12:17] I'm sure it won't be hard ;) [12:17] thats good news :) [12:17] in mozilla configure in there is if test "$MOZ_LDAP_XPCOM"; then [12:17] ... [12:17] there is currently [12:17] LDAP_LIBS='-L${DIST}/bin -L${DIST}/lib -lldap50 -llber50 -lprldap50' [12:17] so if --with-system-ldap is given it should probably by [12:18] right, what version of thunderbird is that for? [12:18] PKG_CHECK_MODULES(LDAP, ... [12:18] 2.0 [12:18] ah [12:18] so it's still using the old version [12:18] is 6 from trunk? [12:18] I'd presume so [12:18] apparently yes ... can you build ldap 5 same way? [12:18] it's a separate tarball now [12:18] it should be possible, if I can make them not conflict [12:19] you can make libmozldap5-0 and libmozldap6-0 i guess [12:20] yes, there are some additional tools [12:20] what packages do you squeze out of current source? [12:21] currently libmozldap6, libmozldap-bin & libmozldap-dev [12:21] ok ... did you fix soname ? [12:21] followed SONAME pattern of libnss3, etc [12:21] mozilla usually has no good soname [12:21] yes ... libnss3 is bad [12:21] we now use libnss3-0d [12:21] ah right [12:21] since we do it proper :) [12:21] probably good to use libmozldap6-0d then [12:22] yes [12:22] more -0d packages :( [12:22] gnomefreak: more broken upstreams [12:22] you think it might be worth naming the tools libmozldap6-bin ? [12:22] hm [12:22] e.g. so we can have libmozldap5-bin installed at same time? [12:22] -dev is good imo [12:22] currently I don't have the tools even included [12:22] so what is in -bin ? [12:22] still "the future" :) [12:23] seems to be, I shoudl have checked it further [12:23] what tools are in there? [12:23] .e.g what will be in there ;) ? [12:24] little things like ldapdelete, ldappasswd, ldapsearch [12:25] ITP ... debian? [12:25] todo [12:26] if you package mozilla stuff for debian please set maintainer to pkg-mozilla-maintainers@... and you as uploader [12:26] we do so for everything that is new :) [12:26] ok [12:26] and at best commit to svn.debian.org/pkg-mozilla ... [12:27] your debian directory [12:27] which means I'd have to join the team [12:27] look of what is in there atm [12:27] sure [12:27] if you need access just let me know [12:27] sigh, another team === ajmitch seems to collect them [12:27] heh, jordi is an admin [12:27] wonderful [12:28] he was my AM [12:28] yeah ... jordi is not active though [12:28] if you have something you want to commit, I will set you up [12:28] ok, I'll get this changed & ready [12:28] ajmitch: going for DD?