=== BenC [n=bcollins@debian/developer/bcollins] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
BenC | successful boot, with nvidia drivers...I think this is ready to upload | 12:19 |
---|---|---|
Nafallo | BenC: yay! | 12:45 |
=== ..[topic/#ubuntu-kernel:BenC] : Ubuntu kernel development discussion ONLY | Kernel Wiki: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam | Latest kernel upload: 2.6.22-1 (really 2.6.21, but whos counting) | Latest news: -rt and -xen kernels included in build. | ||
ajmitch | BenC: nice, so xen kernel binaries will still fall to universe? | 01:03 |
BenC | yes | 01:03 |
BenC | xen and rt will be in universe | 01:04 |
=== johanbr [n=j@blk-224-156-151.eastlink.ca] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== cjwatson_ [n=cjwatson@82-69-40-219.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
BenC | battery life seems pretty good with this tickless kernel | 02:17 |
=== jml [n=jml@59.167.203.115] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== pkl_ [n=phillip@lougher.demon.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== jml_ [n=jml@59.167.203.115] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
BenC | awesome, build failures all around | 03:02 |
=== reitblatt [n=mark@resnet-50-133.dorm.utexas.edu] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== reitblatt [n=mark@resnet-50-133.dorm.utexas.edu] has left #ubuntu-kernel [] | ||
=== MrNOKIA1 [n=user@86.121.178.243] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== ivoks [n=ivoks@0-195.dsl.iskon.hr] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== dade` [n=dade@85-18-201-175.ip.fastwebnet.it] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== dade` [n=dade@85-18-201-175.ip.fastwebnet.it] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== dade` [n=dade@85-18-201-175.ip.fastwebnet.it] has left #ubuntu-kernel [] | ||
=== sb73542 [n=Sully@200.107.49.51] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== sb73542 [n=Sully@200.107.49.51] has left #ubuntu-kernel [] | ||
=== m0rg0th [n=manugarg@220.225.228.97] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== pulkit [n=root@221.134.114.125] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== pulkit [n=root@221.134.114.125] has left #ubuntu-kernel [] | ||
=== bdgraue [n=bdgraue@dyndsl-085-016-027-253.ewe-ip-backbone.de] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== ivoks [n=ivoks@32-36.dsl.iskon.hr] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== qiyong [n=qiyong@fc-cn.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
qiyong | why ntfs is read only? why not rw? | 08:18 |
=== Lure [n=lure@ubuntu/member/lure] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== abogani [n=alessio@adsl203-157-083.mclink.it] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== allee [n=ach@dialin-145-254-251-234.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== gortiz [n=gortiz@88.87.105.4] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== sky_walkie [i=czzhrd02@xdsl-563.lodz.dialog.net.pl] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== ivoks [n=ivoks@5-14.dsl.iskon.hr] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== cassidy [n=cassidy@host-213-189-171-21.brutele.be] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== ivoks [n=ivoks@21-187.dsl.iskon.hr] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== jml [n=jml@59.167.203.115] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== m0rg0th_ [n=manugarg@220.225.228.97] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== bdgraue [n=bdgraue@dyndsl-085-016-027-253.ewe-ip-backbone.de] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== gicmo [n=gicmo@p5491E2BC.dip.t-dialin.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== m0rg0th_ [n=manugarg@220.225.228.97] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== n2diy [n=darryl@66.212.42.141] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== bdgraue_ [n=bdgraue@dyndsl-085-016-169-160.ewe-ip-backbone.de] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== zul [n=chuck@ubuntu/member/zul] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== smurf [n=smurf@debian/developer/smurf] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== m0rg0th [n=manugarg@220.225.228.97] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== EtienneG [n=etienne@ubuntu/member/EtienneG] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== lifeless [n=robertc@ppp245-86.static.internode.on.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== tarnap_ [n=verges@24-151.63-81.stat.fixnetdata.ch] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
tarnap_ | i salute you! | 01:54 |
=== tarnap_ [n=verges@24-151.63-81.stat.fixnetdata.ch] has left #ubuntu-kernel ["Ex-Chat"] | ||
=== sky_walkie [i=czzhrd02@xdsl-563.lodz.dialog.net.pl] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== gortiz [n=gortiz@88.87.105.4] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== zul [n=chuck@CPE0006258ec6c1-CM000a73655d0e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== johanbr [n=j@blk-224-156-151.eastlink.ca] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
Mithrandir | BenC: I've made sure the new kernel builds on palmer now. Hopefully it won't take too long. | 03:50 |
BenC | Mithrandir: thanks | 03:50 |
=== alleeHol [n=ach@dialin-145-254-255-184.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== _allee_ [n=ach@dialin-145-254-253-254.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== cjwatson_ [n=cjwatson@82-69-40-219.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== Keybuk [n=scott@wing-commander.netsplit.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
Keybuk | ya know | 04:46 |
Keybuk | it's just occurred to me that it wouldn't be that hard to put hd[a-z] [0-9] symlinks in place pointing to the libata equivalents | 04:46 |
Keybuk | since we know it's libata, we can find out whether it's PATA, and from there work out which controller it is, etc. | 04:47 |
Keybuk | and the hd names are controller-predictable | 04:47 |
BenC | Keybuk: can you get enough info, like PATA, master/slave and such out of it? | 04:51 |
Keybuk | I think all the info is in the sysfs path alone | 04:51 |
Keybuk | if not, it shouldn't be hard to add it? | 04:52 |
mjg59_ | It's not as easy as you'd think | 04:52 |
Keybuk | no? ;-/ | 04:53 |
mjg59_ | You want to expose cable type, really | 04:53 |
Keybuk | aren't the resource ranges of PATA devices predictable? | 04:54 |
mjg59_ | Not if they're in native mode | 04:55 |
Keybuk | oh well, it was a good idea :) | 04:55 |
=== dade` [n=dade@85-18-201-175.ip.fastwebnet.it] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== pkl_ [n=phillip@lougher.demon.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== pkl_ [n=phillip@lougher.demon.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== pmjdebruijn [n=pmjdebru@pmjdebruijn.xs4all.nl] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== johanbr [n=j@JBrannlund.MathStat.Dal.Ca] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== Codename_PBLP [n=Shoaibi@202.163.65.233] has joined #UBUNTU-KERNEL | ||
=== bdmurray [n=bdmurray@c-24-21-235-175.hsd1.or.comcast.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
bdmurray | BenC: ping | 05:54 |
BenC | bdmurray: hey | 05:54 |
bdmurray | I'm looking at bug 110168 where the reporter says only one cpu is showing up | 05:54 |
bdmurray | I asked for /proc/cpuinfo and sure enough there is only 1 CPU what else should we look at? | 05:55 |
dade` | -386 kernel ? | 05:59 |
bdmurray | yes | 06:01 |
Nafallo | that flavour isn't SMP, right? | 06:02 |
Nafallo | so tell him to try with -generic | 06:02 |
bdmurray | ah, wrong answer then | 06:02 |
bdmurray | yes he is using generic but it is on i386 | 06:03 |
Nafallo | that's not -386 kernel then ;-) | 06:03 |
bdmurray | indeed | 06:04 |
=== cjwatson_ [n=cjwatson@82-69-40-219.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
BenC | model name : Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.80GHz | 06:13 |
BenC | I don't think that's a dual core cpu | 06:13 |
BenC | hmm...maybe it is | 06:15 |
BenC | bdmurray: Could be he has multi-core disabled in BIOS...waiting for dmesg | 06:18 |
=== bleinmono [n=toffel@ppp91-76-73-141.pppoe.mtu-net.ru] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
bdmurray | BenC: okay, thanks. so dmesg would be definitive then? | 06:23 |
BenC | dmesg would at least tell us why it didn't probe, or failed to probe the second core | 06:24 |
mjg59 | Dual-core Celeron? Really? | 06:24 |
mjg59 | Everything I can find suggests not | 06:25 |
=== Zic [n=Zic@Final-Fantasy.FF-IRC.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== mdz [n=mdz@yttrium.canonical.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
mdz | pkl_: do you have any thoughts on bug 96084? | 06:31 |
mdz | there may be more than one problem there, but it seems certain that there is at least one genuine bug which should be investigated | 06:31 |
pkl_ | I seem to recall the original bug was something quite weird and unexplained. If it is still happening, then it should be looked at again. | 06:38 |
pkl_ | mdz: I'll have a look at it again, and see if there's anything possible fixes for the first Feisty kernel SRU. | 06:39 |
mdz | pkl_: I read over the comments, and I didn't see any which seemed to point to a cause; everyone is going on about the top level symptom (being dropped to initramfs) | 06:39 |
mdz | pkl_: oh, I see a BUG in one of the screenshots | 06:40 |
pkl_ | mdz: yes, it looked like the probe was passing a NULL string to printk. | 06:41 |
mdz | pkl_: could you follow up to the bug with your analysis? it's a great help both to other developers (to benefit from your analysis and follow it further) and the community (to know that someone has looked at the bug) | 06:44 |
pkl_ | mdz: OK | 06:44 |
=== Eruantalon [n=hans@5634185c.rev.stofanet.dk] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== ivoks [n=ivoks@2-37.dsl.iskon.hr] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
lamont | BenC: did the hppa build-fix get uploaded yet? | 07:20 |
lamont | just curious | 07:20 |
BenC | lamont: feisty SRU hasn't happened yet | 07:21 |
lamont | right | 07:21 |
BenC | we're trying to snag a couple more fixes | 07:21 |
lamont | ok. was actually meaning to gutsy | 07:22 |
BenC | the gutsy upload is strictly 2.6.21 stock source | 07:22 |
lamont | we didn't make the window to have feisty/hppa in launchpad, so the target is now to have enough there to make the bootstrap of gutsy easy. | 07:22 |
BenC | so if isn't in linux-2.6, then no | 07:22 |
Nafallo | feisty is SO yesterday ;-) | 07:22 |
BenC | lamont: unless you mean the debian/* fixes, in which case, yes they did make it :) | 07:23 |
lamont | Makefile | 07:23 |
BenC | yeah, the strip fixes made it into gutsy | 07:23 |
lamont | and it needs an hppa.ignore abi file in the gutsy upload as well, until we finally get the abi file back into the source tree... | 07:23 |
mrec__ | BenC: do you still accept critical bugfixes? | 07:23 |
lamont | that's actually true for any ports arch where we don't have the previous abi file. | 07:24 |
BenC | mrec__: of course :) | 07:32 |
mrec__ | http://mcentral.de/hg/~mrec/v4l-dvb-stable/ the last 3 patches.. they're already included in the repository on linuxtv now | 07:33 |
mrec__ | but linus didn't pull them for 2.6.21 | 07:33 |
mrec__ | http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-dvb%40linuxtv.org/msg23028.html | 07:33 |
mrec__ | it doesn't solve that problem, but it solves crashing the whole box if it happens at least | 07:34 |
BenC | mrec__: any chance we could get some patches against feisty git? | 07:35 |
mrec__ | BenC: I can prepare them they aren't difficult.. | 07:35 |
mrec__ | even I think they should apply as they are there | 07:36 |
BenC | mrec__: If you could just send the request and link to kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com (feisty in the subject) so pkl can pick it up, that'd be great | 07:36 |
mrec__ | ok I'll send it tomorrow | 07:37 |
BenC | he can probably grab the patches easily, so I wouldn't worry about getting them just for feisty git | 07:37 |
mrec__ | many interesting things happen now on the multimedia side, Kworld just sent me an email that they're interested in linux support | 07:38 |
mrec__ | they even sent me windows code :) | 07:38 |
mrec__ | (to replace some reverse engineered drivers) | 07:38 |
pkl_ | mrec_: yeah, please send the link to kernel-team, and I'll pick up the patches from there. Thanks. | 07:41 |
=== jpon [n=jpon@neu67-3-82-239-80-181.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== bleinmono [n=toffel@ppp91-76-73-141.pppoe.mtu-net.ru] has left #ubuntu-kernel [] | ||
=== johanbr [n=j@blk-224-156-151.eastlink.ca] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== m0rg0th [n=manugarg@219.64.120.181] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== Eruantalon [n=hans@5634185c.rev.stofanet.dk] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
BenC | yay, lum uploading | 08:54 |
BenC | pretty much gets us at 98% of functionality for gutsy kernel | 08:54 |
BenC | cjwatson: btw, there's a new udeb, ubuntu-modules, which contains some scsi and net controllers that used to be in normal udeb's | 08:55 |
=== doko_ [n=doko@dslb-088-073-082-203.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== johanbr [n=j@blk-224-156-151.eastlink.ca] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== ash211 [n=andrew@user-1121k7e.dsl.mindspring.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== calavera [n=cal@195.Red-80-26-32.staticIP.rima-tde.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
Nafallo | Linux silverfairy 2.6.22-1-generic #1 SMP Fri Apr 27 14:45:08 GMT 2007 i686 GNU/Linux | 10:19 |
Nafallo | :-) | 10:19 |
BenC | kewl | 10:19 |
BenC | is that from the archive build? | 10:20 |
Nafallo | indeed. I grabbed it from LP :-) | 10:20 |
BenC | nice | 10:20 |
BenC | lrm and lum are uploaded, just waiting for the builds | 10:21 |
Nafallo | lum? metapackages? | 10:21 |
BenC | lum == linux-ubuntu-modules | 10:21 |
Nafallo | aha. kewl. | 10:22 |
BenC | like lrm, but it's all the stuff that used to be in ubuntu/ in feisty | 10:22 |
Nafallo | so my webcam might work soon ;-) | 10:22 |
BenC | ivtv doesn't build right with 2.6.21 v4l2 yet | 10:22 |
BenC | I probably just need to snag a newer version | 10:22 |
Nafallo | qcusb :-) | 10:22 |
BenC | ah, that should be there then | 10:23 |
BenC | wont have meta packages till after UDS | 10:23 |
Nafallo | hmm. the source is probably in unapproved? | 10:23 |
BenC | let this initial upload simmer a bit | 10:23 |
Nafallo | I haven't seen lrm and lum on -changes | 10:24 |
BenC | probably...archive folks are well into their weekend by now | 10:24 |
Nafallo | indeed | 10:24 |
BenC | lrm is in need-build on lp | 10:24 |
Nafallo | ah :-) | 10:24 |
Nafallo | I haven't seen my sponsored uploads to main yet either ;-) | 10:25 |
Nafallo | atleast not in the archive | 10:25 |
Nafallo | eog was the first one, and it's pending :-P | 10:27 |
Nafallo | :-) | 10:27 |
=== dade` [n=dade@85-18-201-175.ip.fastwebnet.it] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== zorglu_ [n=zorglub@165.43.102-84.rev.gaoland.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
zorglu_ | q. i would like to intercept a given syscall for all the apps (namely the bind() syscall), is there a way to do that? where should i look ? | 10:35 |
BenC | zorglu_: I'm not sure you can, but the kernel source is the place to look | 10:39 |
zorglu_ | hehe :) | 10:39 |
BenC | are you attempting to get rid of the port < 1024 restriction on non-root? | 10:40 |
zorglu_ | thanks but very large :) i would look for something similar to ipfilter but for syscall | 10:40 |
zorglu_ | i was wondering if the guys doing all the security have soemthing like that | 10:40 |
BenC | there's no easy to to hook into syscalls | 10:40 |
BenC | basically hacking the code and recompiling, that's about it | 10:41 |
zorglu_ | arg no cool | 10:41 |
zorglu_ | ok thanks for your help | 10:41 |
mjg59 | Well, for dynamically linked applications, you can LD_PRELOAD | 10:42 |
=== cjb [n=cjb@pullcord.laptop.org] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== OldKid [n=oldi@fresno121.webperoni.de] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
zorglu_ | yep i was thinking about something like that, but issue with statically linked exe | 10:42 |
zorglu_ | well a first implementation could use tLD_PRELOAD and maybe doing modif in kernel if the approach is proven 'good' | 10:43 |
cjb | Hi. There's a vm_insert_pfm() namespace clash; the Ubuntu kernel has started defining it for some reason (upstream doesn't), and drm uses it too, so compiling against drm is broken. I don't see a launchpad bug; does anyone know about this? | 10:44 |
BenC | cjb: how is it broken? | 11:07 |
cjb | BenC: /home/cjb/git/drm/linux-core/drm_compat.c:190: error: static declaration of vm_insert_pfn follows non-static declaration | 11:07 |
cjb | include/linux/mm.h:1126: error: previous declaration of vm_insert_pfn was here | 11:07 |
cjb | 11:07 | |
cjb | BenC: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10576 diagnoses it. | 11:07 |
BenC | cjb: that's not our bug...your source need to not define it | 11:07 |
BenC | obviously it is doing so to be compatible with pre 2.6.21 kernels, which our kernel is | 11:08 |
BenC | however we pulled in some changes related to that from 2.6.21 to support newer drivers (like newer drm) | 11:08 |
BenC | cjb: edit drm_compat.c, and comment out that function declaration | 11:09 |
cjb | BenC: So, you're using code from 2.6.21, but you're not willing to advertise your kernel as 2.6.21, and you don't care that it breaks stuff. :) | 11:09 |
BenC | I'm not going to call our kernel 2.6.21 just because we pulled one API from 2.6.21 | 11:10 |
cjb | Yeah, I know I can do that. I was hoping that other people using Ubuntu might be able to compile drm too. ;-) | 11:10 |
BenC | and there's no way for me to "fix" it | 11:10 |
=== zaph31 [n=cyril@lns-bzn-22-82-249-94-119.adsl.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
cjb | Okay, I understand. It's not usual for something to check the kernel version, then? | 11:11 |
BenC | cjb: there's a small matter of whether we want a 2.6.20 compatible API, or better hw support...since we are more interested in the latter, since it helps alleviate the need for the former, we chose to update things | 11:11 |
BenC | cjb: it's normal yes, but it only applies to stock kernel code...no distro that I know of has perfect API compatibility with the stock source that the base on | 11:12 |
cjb | BenC: Yeah. | 11:15 |
=== ash211_ [n=andrew@user-1121k7e.dsl.mindspring.com] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== zaph31 [n=cyril@lns-bzn-22-82-249-94-119.adsl.proxad.net] has left #ubuntu-kernel ["Konversation] | ||
cjb | BenC: drm has a policy to only support API changes in official kernel releases, so I guess I can just tell you that if you pull drm early without being willing to fix the API checks, you'll continue to lose. :) | 11:30 |
=== gortiz [n=gortiz@88.87.105.4] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
BenC | cjb: how can I fix those checks? | 11:30 |
BenC | I mean really, what would you have me do? | 11:30 |
cjb | BenC: You can make them fail in your kernel source.. | 11:32 |
cjb | Oh. No you can't; sorry, being slow. | 11:32 |
BenC | besides, I think only a very very very few of our users plan on compiling their own drm, and those people know how to overcome this, and expect to do so, which means it isn't a loss for me or the distro | 11:32 |
BenC | or for our users in general | 11:33 |
cjb | I'd hope for more collaboration upstream than "haha, we broke compiling drm, it's your problem", but I understand your situation. | 11:33 |
mjg59 | cjb: I can't think of any clean method to make these things fail. The assumption that checking for a kernel version is equivalent to checking for an API version has never been true. | 11:35 |
BenC | cjb: there's no way to collaborate, there's nothing I can do to fix it | 11:39 |
BenC | it's simply not possible | 11:39 |
BenC | besides, I didn't "break" anything | 11:40 |
=== MrNOKIA1 [n=user@86.121.181.146] has joined #ubuntu-kernel | ||
=== gortiz [n=gortiz@88.87.105.4] has joined #ubuntu-kernel |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!