[12:39] <asac> some bug commentors are plain nuts :)
[12:39] <gnomefreak> lol
[12:41] <asac> Bug 89704
[12:41] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 89704 in firefox "No backport of Firefox 2.o to Dapper" [Wishlist,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/89704
[12:41] <asac> last comment
[12:42] <erb__> If you type in a field with Opera, and then reload/refresh the page, the text in the field is cleared. Does anyone know how to prevent this?
[12:42] <asac> i guess ubuntu-mozillateam does not use opera a lot ;)
[12:43] <gnomefreak> problem there is he doesnt read everything. mozilla did not stop patching 1.5 but will in the months to come
[12:43] <asac> gnomefreak: right
[12:43] <gnomefreak> erb__: try #opera?
[12:43] <asac> is there such a channel=
[12:43] <asac> ?
[12:43] <gnomefreak> asac: should be
[12:44] <gnomefreak> if not than good luck
[12:44] <asac> erb__: try that or look for internet forums
[12:44] <erb__> OK, I wansn't sure if Opera is derived from Mozilla
[12:44] <gnomefreak> do we have a final support date yet?
[12:44] <asac> gnomefreak: not yet
[12:44] <gnomefreak> erb__: no its nonfree
[12:45] <asac> there will definitly be one more release
[12:45] <asac> everything else would be crazy
[12:45] <gnomefreak> oh there will?
[12:45] <gnomefreak> .4?
[12:45] <asac> yes
[12:45] <gnomefreak> oh duh
[12:45] <asac> thats for sure
[12:45] <asac> i will have to go with redhat/novell guys to figure out what happens next
[12:45] <gnomefreak> 1.5.0.11 would be next release of 1.5 iirc
[12:46] <asac> current + 1 it will be :)
[12:46] <gnomefreak> asac: we can backport 2.0 to dapper but i think best way to do that is to kill the libc6 depend
[12:46] <asac> are we at .10?
[12:46] <gnomefreak> i think .10 is last
[12:46] <gnomefreak> thats why i was thinking .11
[12:46] <asac> problem is not firefox, but that all apps that use mozembed will break and need at least a respin
[12:47] <gnomefreak> yeah that is alot of work
[12:47] <gnomefreak> IMHO dapper should have gotten 2.0 beta (iirc that was there) since its LTS
[12:48] <asac> dapper?
[12:48] <gnomefreak> maybe not as stable as people would like but there werent that many issues
[12:48] <gnomefreak> asac: yeah dapper
[12:48] <asac> you cannot do that
[12:48] <asac> really
[12:48] <asac> beta is not officially supported, no security issues tracked. Complete mess
[12:48] <gnomefreak> i can dream cant i :(
[12:48] <asac> sure ;)
[12:49] <asac> we can also put up 3.0 to gutsy
[12:49] <gnomefreak> well i dont think this was something they were thinking about
[12:49] <asac> :)
[12:49] <gnomefreak> in universe?
[12:49] <asac> but i doubt thats wise :)
[12:49] <asac> they certainly did think about the firefox support mess
[12:49] <gnomefreak> asac: would it hurt anything for the alphas?
[12:49] <asac> we will have the firefox-trunk package
[12:50] <asac> but that won't be used by mozembedders
[12:50] <gnomefreak> yeah we have to repin everything after i get gutsy repo opened
[12:50] <gnomefreak> respin. but i can do that given a few days
[12:50] <asac> tomorrow i will try to upload tbird
[12:50] <asac> want to have it going before sevilla
[12:50] <gnomefreak> true
[12:51] <asac> take ;)
[12:51] <gnomefreak> i leave sometime this week and will be in and out for the most part thursday-sunday i doubt ill be here at all
[12:52] <asac> ok
[12:52] <gnomefreak> do you want respin on ffox in gutsy once nss and nspr are uploadeD?
[12:52] <asac> yes
[12:52] <gnomefreak> or do you want to wait out the hunspell?
[12:53] <asac> current idea. push nss and nspr through NEW
[12:53] <asac> then go and push thunderbird
[12:53] <asac> 2.0
[12:54] <gnomefreak> if we are not waiting for new hunspell i can respin all of them in gutsy with the time i have since i can leave them build for a couple of hours
[12:54] <asac> then enigmail, locales, ffox, ffox-trunk
[12:54] <gnomefreak> iceape > ffox-trunk IMHO
[12:55] <asac> ah right
[12:55] <gnomefreak> its gonna need the most care i would think
[12:55] <asac> yes
[12:55] <asac> why?
[12:55] <gnomefreak> ffox-trunk upstream is still working on everyday
[12:55] <gnomefreak> iceape == stable release
[12:56] <asac> ah ... yes we release ffox-trunk to official archive only on alpha/beta/rc releases
[12:56] <asac> not daily
[12:56] <gnomefreak> -trunk we will be updating more
[12:56] <asac> maybe i name it ffox-preview
[12:56] <asac> not -trunk
[12:56] <asac> yes
[12:56] <gnomefreak> that might be better
[12:56] <gnomefreak> we wont keep it in repos unles sit is stable before release?
[12:57] <asac> think we will not release it
[12:57] <gnomefreak> unless it
[12:57] <asac> but maybe we will
[12:57] <asac> and update as security releases
[12:57] <gnomefreak> ok than why tease people ;)
[12:57] <asac> but that has to be figured out
[12:57] <gnomefreak> asac: that is coming up in sevilla?
[12:57] <asac> probably
[12:58] <asac> one point i should add to my list
[12:58] <asac> :)
[12:58] <gnomefreak> :)
[12:58] <gnomefreak> i need to test reply-to-list (i havent gotten a list post since i installed it)  i would like that to be added but im sure there are easier things we can do
[12:59] <asac> its not there?
[12:59] <asac> afaik the patch is in
[12:59] <gnomefreak> the patch but the addon itself is a bitch to find
[12:59] <asac> a bitch?
[12:59] <gnomefreak> since tbird doesnt support it it seems
[12:59] <asac> hmmm
[01:00] <gnomefreak> its not on tbirds extentions page
[01:00] <asac> once i released icedove he will probably update his extension
[01:00] <asac> ah yes ... the link is in my entry
[01:00] <gnomefreak> yep
[01:00] <gnomefreak> your doing icedove for debian?
[01:00] <asac> http://www.asoftsite.org/s9y/archives/114-thunderbird-+-reply-to-list-...-here-it-comes.html
[01:00] <asac> yes icedove 2.0
[01:00] <gnomefreak> ah
[01:00] <gnomefreak> yep thats where i got it from
[01:01] <gnomefreak> afaik it hasnt been tested on 2.0
[01:01] <gnomefreak> seems someone in the replys tested on 3.0 thougyh
[01:01] <gnomefreak> -y
[01:01] <asac> http://alumnit.ca/wiki/index.php?page=ReplyToListThunderbirdExtension
[01:01] <asac> slow site
[01:01] <asac> but there the extension is
[01:02] <gnomefreak> yeah this was one of the pages i looked at. i think your blog sends you here
[01:02] <asac> yes
[01:02] <asac> http://alumnit.ca/wiki/attachments/replytolist-0.2.0.xpi
[01:02] <asac> thats the desired blob
[01:02] <gnomefreak> yeah it took me a while to go through each link to get to where i got it
[01:04] <asac> does it work?
[01:04] <asac> i don't see the patch
[01:04] <asac> do you have the patch?
[01:04] <gnomefreak> not sure yet ill know by tomorrow
[01:04] <gnomefreak> no patch needed
[01:04] <asac> didn't i modify it?
[01:04] <gnomefreak> it was included afaik
[01:04] <asac> no patch needed?
[01:04] <gnomefreak> asac: no
[01:04] <gnomefreak> not that i saw
[01:04] <asac> hmm doubt it has been included
[01:04] <gnomefreak> I also want to say that apparently your patch is also included in the mozilla-thunderbird-2.0.0.0 (testing) package
[01:05] <asac> will look
[01:05] <gnomefreak> that is last post on last link
[01:05] <gnomefreak> http://alumnit.ca/wiki/index.php?page=ReplyToListThunderbirdExtension
[01:05] <gnomefreak> so i figured it was included
[01:05] <asac> ups
[01:06] <asac> which mozilla-thunderbird package ... upstream?
[01:06] <asac> hmmm
[01:06] <asac> interesting
[01:08] <gnomefreak> im using ours
[01:08] <gnomefreak> so im assuming it was placed in upstream
[01:10] <gnomefreak> im grabbing the latest source of our build ill see if it was added
[01:11] <gnomefreak> it would be nice if the patch stated the version of thunderbird
[01:12] <gnomefreak> it was built on apr. 6
[01:12] <gnomefreak> 2006
[01:12] <gnomefreak> atleast alumnit;s patch is
[01:14] <gnomefreak> it doesnt seem to work on our build
[01:14] <gnomefreak> atleast it cant reply to ubuntu-users list
[01:15] <asac> ok
[01:15] <asac> i think we need the patch
[01:15] <asac> makes sense
[01:15] <asac> thought i did that
[01:15] <gnomefreak> yep it does
[01:15] <asac> but i can't see it here
[01:15] <gnomefreak> i never saww it
[01:17] <gnomefreak> i do remember the patch we used for 1.5 fails to apply on 2.0
[01:18] <asac> i remembe rthat i merged it
[01:18] <asac> i guess you have it somewhere
[01:18] <asac> :)
[01:18] <asac> i gave it to you ;)
[01:18] <gnomefreak> i dont :( that im aware of
[01:18] <asac> but it never ended in bzr
[01:19] <gnomefreak> i had the 1.5 version never saw 2.0 version
[01:19] <asac> maybe ... anyway tomorrow it will land in bzr
[01:19] <gnomefreak> ok
[01:19] <asac> nss, nspr will go up :)
[01:19] <gnomefreak> :)
[01:20] <asac> so what issues did tbird have so far?
[01:20] <gnomefreak> i will try to fork gutsy in dists/ in my repo
[01:20] <gnomefreak> the hopepage and stuff were fixed
[01:20] <gnomefreak> homepage*
[01:21] <gnomefreak> the install dilog
[01:21] <gnomefreak> dialog (the one where you set up accounts)
[01:21] <gnomefreak> the folder i guess people can deal with
[01:21] <gnomefreak> if it upgrades smoothly
[01:21] <asac> hmm
[01:22] <asac> yes the install dialog
[01:22] <gnomefreak> since i wasnt able to upgrade mozilla-thunderbird to thunderbird
[01:22] <asac> thats a bit wierd
[01:22] <asac> i don't see it here
[01:22] <asac> :)
[01:22] <asac> i mean i don't see in sourc where the wizard info is
[01:22] <gnomefreak> asac: go to add account
[01:22] <gnomefreak> ah
[01:22] <asac> yes i know that .)
[01:22] <gnomefreak> ;)
[01:22] <asac> its missing in sources ;)
[01:23] <asac> what is the list we are missing?
[01:23] <asac> google?
[01:23] <gnomefreak> google on ffox is not included
[01:24] <asac> yes that i know
[01:24] <gnomefreak> gmail unix spool and a couple of others
[01:24] <asac> i mean for tbird
[01:24] <asac> gmail
[01:24] <asac> you said
[01:24] <gnomefreak> hold on im load ing it
[01:25] <gnomefreak> upstream has.  email account, unix mailspool (movemail), RSS news & blogs, Gmail, newsgroup account
[01:26] <asac> hmmm think i found it
[01:26] <gnomefreak> we have. email account, and newsgroup account
[01:26] <asac> ./usr/lib/thunderbird/isp
[01:26] <asac> ./usr/lib/thunderbird/isp/SpamAssassin.sfd
[01:26] <asac> ./usr/lib/thunderbird/isp/SpamPal.sfd
[01:26] <asac> ./usr/lib/thunderbird/isp/en-US
[01:26] <asac> ./usr/lib/thunderbird/isp/en-US/gmail.rdf
[01:26] <asac> ./usr/lib/thunderbird/defaults/isp
[01:26] <asac> those are missing
[01:26] <asac>  ./usr/lib/thunderbird/defaults/isp/rss.rdf
[01:26] <asac> anything else?
[01:27] <gnomefreak> for tbird?
[01:27] <gnomefreak> i think that is it
[01:28] <gnomefreak> oh -dbg package maybe?
[01:28] <gnomefreak> liferea can use one too IMHO but i dont think its used enough to get too many reports on it
[01:34] <gnomefreak> asac: read #8 http://people.ubuntulinux.org/~mako/ubuntu-traffic/latest.html
[01:34] <asac> ok testbuild
[01:34] <asac> nice
[01:36] <asac> gnomefreak: maybe bzr will be updated in 10 min
[01:37] <gnomefreak> ok ill grab it tonight and build it over night for testing
[01:37] <asac> first lets see :)
[01:37] <gnomefreak> do you have pittis repo handy google cant find it
[01:38] <asac> hmm
[01:39] <asac> deb http://people.ubuntu.com/~pitti/ddebs feisty main restricted universe multiverse
[01:39] <gnomefreak> ah ty
[01:40] <asac> lets see
[01:42] <asac> hmm  now i have email + gmail + news
[01:42] <asac> what am i missing?
[01:42] <asac> gnomefreak: what else is there?
[01:46] <gnomefreak> the only things i remember are the folders but thats in upstream, the gmail thing and the patch
[01:48] <gnomefreak> only thing i find is tool bars
[01:48] <asac> i see it here as well
[01:48] <asac> in dist/bin it works
[01:49] <asac> as usual upstream build system is broken for "real" unix installs
[01:49] <asac> now it works
[01:49] <asac> rss.rdf didn't install to right place (e.g. ended in /usr/lib/thunderbird/defaults/isp instead of /usr/lib/thunderbird/isp
[01:49] <asac> and movemail.rdf wasn't installed at all
[01:49] <asac> tse
[01:50] <gnomefreak> are those used often?
[01:53] <asac> actually movemail is broken
[01:53] <asac> i would like to drop it
[01:54] <asac> but upstream ships it for whatever reason
[01:55] <asac> (feisty2)asac@hector:~/ubuntu_bzr/tbird-2.0/build-tree/mozilla/mailnews/base/ispdata$ lsCVS  Makefile.in  README  aol.rdf  dotmac.rdf  gmail.rdf  googlemail.rdf  movemail.rdf
[01:55] <asac> looks like ther is aol.rdf as well
[01:55] <asac> and googlemail :)
[01:58] <gnomefreak> aol mail?
[01:59] <asac> yeah
[01:59] <gnomefreak> yuck
[01:59] <asac> nobody knows what happens if you use that though :)
[02:00] <gnomefreak> true
[02:00] <asac> might be a century old ;)
[02:00] <asac> its such a borked thing
[02:00] <asac> i guess i will drop movemail for now
[02:00] <asac> lets see how much people wine
[02:01] <gnomefreak> cool
[02:01] <asac> why is that cool ;)
[02:01] <gnomefreak> if it is broken we dont need it
[02:01] <asac> i already know what they will write ;)
[02:02] <gnomefreak> too much work to worry about broken crap
[02:02] <asac> tries to integrate well with unix
[02:02] <asac> e.g. what mutt does
[02:02] <asac> but fails miserably :)
[02:03] <gnomefreak> ah
[02:04] <asac> yeah will be in bad most likely
[02:04] <asac> will commit the missing rss.rdf fix
[02:04] <asac> and push to bzr
[02:04] <asac> so maybe try to merge/pull
[02:05] <gnomefreak> k
[02:05] <gnomefreak> ill pull when i get back at;east try to
[02:16] <AlexLatchford> Howdy guys, can anyone experience these bugs?
[02:16] <AlexLatchford> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373424
[02:16] <ubotu> Mozilla bug 373424 in General "Rapidly pressing enter key twice causes crash" [Critical,Unconfirmed] 
[02:16] <AlexLatchford> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=374201
[02:16] <ubotu> Mozilla bug 374201 in Keyboard Navigation "browser crashes when using the enter key to break up paragraphs" [Critical,Unconfirmed] 
[02:16] <AlexLatchford> I have had 4 people now complain to me about this, not on Linux though
[02:16] <AlexLatchford> and I cannot seem to reproduce..
[02:17] <AlexLatchford> (I am not sure if this is a Windows Only bug), but apparently it is pretty annoying one that should get attention for 2.0.0.4
[02:23] <asac> hmm
[02:23] <asac> extension problem?
[02:23] <asac> if its only on windows then we should not bother
[02:25] <asac> most wierd problems are extension/plugin caused :)
[02:26] <asac> are there talkback ids in the bugs?
[02:26] <asac> ah both unconfirmed
[02:26] <asac> hmm
[02:27] <asac> i can't confirm unless we have reports about these
[02:31] <asac> gnomefreak: ok bzr is pushing tbird update
[02:37] <asac> gnomefreak: bzr revert your changes
[02:37] <asac> bzr pull
[02:37] <asac> then change version to -0ubuntu0.mt1
[02:38] <asac> ok out
[05:57] <gnomefreak> asac: you want it to be thunderbird (2.0.0.0-1-0ubuntu0.mt1)? that looks weird. looks worse the way it is. old version is thunderbird (2.0.0.0-1). ill spin it in morning once you answer and im awake or something like that. its almost midnight and im tired.
[11:11] <gnomefreak> bug 89704 is turning into a circus :(
[11:11] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 89704 in firefox "No backport of Firefox 2.o to Dapper" [Wishlist,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/89704
[12:05] <asac> right
[12:27] <asac> gnomefreak: 2.0.0.0-0ubuntu0.mt1
[02:01] <asac> wth ... mail-servers are getting lazy nowadays
[02:01] <asac> just deliever weeks after retrieval
[02:13] <asac> ok sunbird is open for adoption
[02:14] <Admiral_Chicago> not me.
[02:15] <Admiral_Chicago> blah, breakfanht
[02:30] <Admiral_Chicago> bug #54637
[02:30] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 54637 in mozilla-thunderbird "Searching in messages freezes Thunderbird" [Medium,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/54637
[02:46] <asac> hmm ... probably .msf file needs to be regenerated
[02:46] <asac> to not freeze anymore
[04:33] <gnomefreak> dpkg-source: warning: executable mode 0755 of <somefile> will not be represented in diff   is there a way to stop all those warnings?
[04:57] <hjmf> Hi all
[04:57] <hjmf> One question on thunderbird bug 54637
[04:57] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 54637 in mozilla-thunderbird "Searching in messages freezes Thunderbird" [Medium,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/54637
[04:58] <hjmf> https://bugs.beta.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozilla-thunderbird/+bug/54637/comments/7
[04:58] <hjmf> > I can still reproduce this - is it worth trying to strace it? What sort
[04:58] <hjmf> of debugger output would help isolate the issue? <
[04:59] <hjmf> it is a freeze, maybe a live gdb bt if any? or maybe a strace?
[04:59] <gnomefreak> hjmf: is it freeze system up totally or just tbird?
[05:00] <hjmf> I didn't triage that bug, but I understand that is only tb
[05:00] <hjmf> Oops, the OP says that he has already tried to strace with no results
[05:00] <gnomefreak> yay its building finally
[05:01] <gnomefreak> is he doing it correctly or winging it ;)
[05:02] <hjmf> I'm too newbie with gdb to say which commands to use on a freeze and if it yelds something usable :(
[05:02] <gnomefreak> ok opening it and looking at it
[05:03] <gnomefreak> the OP is mark im sure he knows what hes doing
[05:03] <hjmf> that's why I'm reluctant to post a quick answer :-P
[05:04] <gnomefreak> btw you have a good dbg package where as he doesnt
[05:04] <hjmf> do you have messages to search at on tb
[05:04] <hjmf> ?
[05:05] <hjmf> I don't use it
[05:05] <hjmf> at all :)
[05:05] <gnomefreak> try it with the dbg package you have for retraces see if you come up with something i would go with gdb first if that fails try strace but im thinking its the amount of messages or size of them
[05:05] <asac> hjmf: any extensions/plugins?
[05:05] <gnomefreak> asac: happens in safe mode
[05:05] <hjmf> asac: mark states he doesnt
[05:05] <asac> so both of you can reproduce?
[05:05] <hjmf> I don't have tried
[05:06] <gnomefreak> ClaireNewman  and mark see it
[05:06] <gnomefreak> alex cant reproduce it
[05:07] <hjmf> s/ever/never/g
[05:10] <hjmf> I have to go out for a while, maybe half an hour. Will take a look to the logs later if you do end up with something ;)
[05:11] <asac> i asked mark to try something
[05:11] <hjmf> k thanks asac
[05:11] <hjmf> see you
[05:11] <asac> cu
[05:14] <gnomefreak> btw the above warning were due to bad .orig.tar seems that bzr got messed up when cloning
[05:19] <asac> bzr never got messed up :)
[05:20] <asac> you messed up most likely
[05:20] <asac> ah ... no executable is fine
[05:20] <asac> just ignore them
[05:20] <gnomefreak> couldnt
[05:20] <gnomefreak> it failed to build so i re did clone and it is building fine
[05:21] <bluekuja> asac: check my pm
[05:25] <gnomefreak> i hate filing a bug than 18hours later it works like it should :(
[05:26] <asac> bluekuja: why pm?
[05:27] <asac> /usr/share/pixmaps ?
[05:27] <asac> why not right place?
[05:27] <gnomefreak> safer to ask in channel he gets to it that way ;)
[05:28] <asac> he?
[05:29] <gnomefreak> i have to re-get all the branches and i cant remember if we updated iceape branch fully but i think we did
[05:29] <bluekuja> asac: I got two comments in revu saying that its not the right place
[05:29] <asac> dunno ... better keep what you have now if you are unsure
[05:29] <asac> bluekuja: then be more specific
[05:29] <asac> what package ? what kind of images?
[05:30] <bluekuja> I link it to you
[05:30] <bluekuja> just a moment
[05:30] <bluekuja> http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=4901
[05:30] <bluekuja> here it is
[05:30] <asac> if they are for you applications only you should send them somewhere to /usr/share/APPNAME/SOMEFOLDER
[05:31] <bluekuja> check last upload
[05:31] <bluekuja> on 24 april
[05:31] <asac> what does gtorrent-viewer do?
[05:32] <bluekuja> it retrieves infos from trackers, checking files and so on
[05:32] <bluekuja> before starting the download
[05:33] <bluekuja> did you see anything wrong with /pixmaps folder?
[05:34] <gnomefreak> i would be more inclinded to ask laserjock or bddebian since they are the ones that commented on it they would know why they said those things
[05:34] <asac> i am currently not seeing anything
[05:34] <asac> now looking :)
[05:34] <bluekuja> gnomefreak: yeah, that's a good point
[05:35] <bluekuja> asac: found?
[05:35] <asac> bluekuja: you run aclocal and friends during build ... which is bad
[05:36] <asac> bluekuja: yes
[05:36] <asac> its wrong
[05:36] <asac> debian/gtorrent-viewer/pixmaps/gtorrentviewer.xpm
[05:36] <asac> -> debian/gtorrent-viewer/usr/share/pixmaps/gtorrentviewer.xpm
[05:36] <asac> same for the .png
[05:36] <asac> and for applications directory
[05:36] <asac> should go below /usr/share/ as well
[05:37] <bluekuja> oh...I tried to change it into upstream source files
[05:37] <bluekuja> but I got no postive results
[05:37] <bluekuja> what do you suggest me to do to fix it?
[05:38] <asac> fix upstream Makefile.am :)
[05:38] <bluekuja> asac: you rock man :D
[05:39] <asac> pkgdatadir is bad
[05:39] <asac> e.g. its empty
[05:39] <asac> you might be able to pass -datadir to configure
[05:39] <asac> but looks borked as well
[05:44] <asac> bluekuja: looks like it needs a newer automake
[05:44] <asac> just run aclocal and automake -a -f -c once with latest automake
[05:44] <asac> and you will see
[05:45] <asac> bluekuja: yeah automake-1.4 is borked
[05:45] <asac> use automake-1.10
[05:46] <asac> and you are done
[05:46] <asac> please remove autotools-dev from build-depends
[05:46] <asac> and don't run maintainer scripts on normal build
[05:46] <asac> i guess you have to set AM_MAINTAINER_MODE or something like that
[05:47] <asac> if you have more questions let me know
[05:52] <asac> welcome :)
[05:52] <hjmf> :)
[05:53] <huizache> hello I haev just upgraded to ubuntu feisty, and i realize i lost mozilla-browser and mozilla-composer
[05:54] <huizache> how can i reinstall them in ubuntu package?
[05:56] <asac> not in feisty ... at some point we might get iceape as backports ... for now you can try
[05:56] <asac> !moztest
[05:56] <ubotu> The Mozilla-testing repos can be found at: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/PreviewArchives. Please remember these are testing repos, the packages in these repos are not stable and may break things on your system. Use with caution. Please report bugs that you find from these packages to: ubuntu-mozillateam@lists.ubuntu.com
[05:56] <asac> huizache: ^^^^
[05:56] <asac> there you find iceape-browser + iceape-composer
[05:56] <asac> which is the same
[05:56] <asac> like mozilla-browser + -composer
[05:57] <huizache> asac: ok thank you
[05:57] <asac> packages should be there unless you are on amd64
[05:57] <huizache> asac: it is an imoprtant lose...
[05:57] <asac> in that case let me know ... i will push amd64 packages then
[05:57] <asac> we will get iceape-* in gutsy again
[05:58] <asac> unfortunate that we don't have it in feisty, right.
[05:58] <huizache> asac: are they VERY buggy?
[05:59] <asac> usually not
[05:59] <asac> at least iceape should be fine
[06:00] <huizache> asac: thank you, am updating menu.lists
[06:00] <asac> he?
[06:00] <asac> ah you mean sources.lists
[06:00] <asac> :)
[06:01] <asac> hjmf: is retrace service broken?
[06:01] <huizache> sorry, yes
[06:01] <asac> hjmf: ah nevermind its edgy where you asked for amd64 retrace
[06:01] <hjmf> asac: don't know, but I can retrace and autopost rightly
[06:01] <hjmf> ah! ok
[06:02] <hjmf> yes, an edgy report
[06:02] <hjmf> :)
[06:04] <asac> bluekuja: did it work?
[06:06] <bluekuja> asac: it seems to be working now(testing it), I uploaded it into revu again, try to see it http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=4972
[06:06] <bluekuja> again
[06:10] <huizache> asac: PERFECT, it is working, I will report back bugs. Salud
[06:13] <asac> bluekuja: did you fix that autotool files don't get regen?
[06:13] <bluekuja> asac: nope I changed makefile.am only
[06:14] <asac> to what?
[06:14] <asac> you should have regen with new autoconf only
[06:14] <asac> aeh automake
[06:14] <asac> nothing else needed ... + fix the autoregen of those files.
[06:14] <asac> at least thats what i would ask you to do ;)
[06:15] <bluekuja> asac: damn, I missed it and I changed makefile.am to change subdirs
[06:15] <bluekuja> to install it not on pixmaps
[06:15] <bluekuja> but on /usr/share/application/pixmaps
[06:16] <bluekuja> and now I have /usr/share/pixmaps
[06:16] <asac> bluekuja: maybe you have been offline?
[06:16] <asac> wait a sec
[06:16] <asac> 17:38 < bluekuja> asac: you rock man :D
[06:16] <asac> 17:39 < asac> pkgdatadir is bad
[06:16] <asac> 17:39 < asac> e.g. its empty
[06:16] <asac> 17:39 < asac> you might be able to pass -datadir to configure
[06:16] <asac> 17:39 < asac> but looks borked as well
[06:16] <asac> 17:44 < asac> bluekuja: looks like it needs a newer automake
[06:16] <bluekuja> I got dced
[06:16] <asac> 17:44 < asac> just run aclocal and automake -a -f -c once with latest automake
[06:16] <asac> 17:44 < asac> and you will see
[06:16] <asac> 17:45 < asac> bluekuja: yeah automake-1.4 is borked
[06:16] <asac> 17:45 < asac> use automake-1.10
[06:16] <asac> 17:46 < asac> and you are done
[06:16] <asac> 17:46 < asac> please remove autotools-dev from build-depends
[06:16] <asac> 17:46 < asac> and don't run maintainer scripts on normal build
[06:16] <asac> 17:46 < asac> i guess you have to set AM_MAINTAINER_MODE or something like that
[06:17] <asac> 17:47 < asac> if you have more questions let me know
[06:17] <bluekuja> awwwww
[06:17] <bluekuja> I got dced
[06:17] <bluekuja> after i said you rock man
[06:17] <asac> all ok ;)
[06:17] <bluekuja> :D
[06:17] <asac> yeah i saw that now
[06:18] <bluekuja> let's do it
[06:25] <bluekuja> asac: i get this output after aclocal and automake
[06:25] <bluekuja> asac: src/Makefile.am:8: `CFLAGS' is a user variable, you should not override it;
[06:25] <bluekuja> src/Makefile.am:8: use `AM_CFLAGS' instead.
[06:29] <gnomefreak> seems alpha 5 was released
[06:29] <gnomefreak> ill see about spinning that when tbird is done
[06:31] <asac> bluekuja: yeah thats a bug
[06:32] <asac> in upstream Makefiles
[06:32] <asac> you must not set CFLAGS
[06:32] <asac> but use AM_CFLAGS
[06:32] <bluekuja> asac: yes, I just changed it
[06:32] <bluekuja> asac: now i get configure.in:89: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_PROG_INTLTOOL
[06:32] <bluekuja>       If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
[06:32] <bluekuja>       See the Autoconf documentation.
[06:32] <bluekuja> make[1] : *** [configure]  Error 1
[06:32] <bluekuja> make[1] : Leaving directory `/home/andy/package-revu-3/gtorrent-viewer-0.2b'
[06:32] <bluekuja> make: *** [build-stamp]  Error 2
[06:32] <asac> did you rerun autoconf?
[06:32] <bluekuja> yes
[06:33] <asac> automake?
[06:33] <asac> automake -a -f -c ?
[06:33] <bluekuja> aclocal, automake, autoconf
[06:33] <bluekuja> ye
[06:33] <bluekuja> let me re-run them
[06:33] <bluekuja> again
[06:34] <asac> maybe you have to run aclocal, autoconf, automake ? ... e.g. in that sequence?
[06:34] <bluekuja> yeah
[06:34] <bluekuja> let's try
[06:35] <bluekuja> ./configure: line 3791: `AC_PROG_INTLTOOL(0.23)'
[06:35] <bluekuja> make: *** [config.status]  Error 2
[06:35] <bluekuja> now
[06:35] <bluekuja> running them in that sequence
[06:36] <bluekuja> in sequence aclocal, automake, autoconf now i get
[06:36] <bluekuja> configure.in:89: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_PROG_INTLTOOL
[06:36] <bluekuja>       If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
[06:36] <bluekuja>       See the Autoconf documentation.
[06:37] <asac> interesting ... for me it just worked :/
[06:37] <bluekuja> mmmm....
[06:37] <bluekuja> lets do it again starting from the first step
[06:40] <asac> bluekuja: clean target does not clean your sources
[06:40] <asac> which is big problem
[06:40] <bluekuja> yeah
[06:40] <asac> $(MAKE) clean distclean
[06:42] <bluekuja> added
[06:42] <bluekuja> lets try
[06:48] <bluekuja> asac: that error again
[06:48] <bluekuja> with this one ./configure: line 3791: syntax error near unexpected token `0.23'
[06:48] <bluekuja> ./configure: line 3791: `AC_PROG_INTLTOOL(0.23)'
[06:52] <asac> bluekuja: what versions of the helper apps are you using?
[06:53] <bluekuja> what do you mean with helper apps?
[06:54] <bluekuja> automake, autoconf etc?
[06:55] <bluekuja> asac: ?
[06:58] <asac> yes
[06:59] <bluekuja> asac: automake 1.10
[06:59] <bluekuja> autoconf 2.61
[06:59] <asac> aclocal as well?
[06:59] <bluekuja> yes
[07:00] <asac> hmm
[07:00] <bluekuja> asac: I gonna become crazy for this
[07:00] <bluekuja> asac: :D
[07:00] <asac> works here
[07:01] <bluekuja> damn
[07:01] <asac> i have AC_PROG_INTLTOOL([0.23] )
[07:01] <asac> is it the same for you?
[07:02] <bluekuja> yes
[07:02] <bluekuja> thats it
[07:02] <bluekuja> ./configure: line 3791: `AC_PROG_INTLTOOL(0.23)'
[07:03] <asac> yeah ... no problem here ;)
[07:03] <bluekuja> you can build without problems there?
[07:03] <asac> yes
[07:03] <bluekuja> that's strange....did you download the source using revu?
[07:04] <asac> he?
[07:04] <asac> i pulled what was there with wget
[07:04] <asac> dpkg-source -x ...
[07:04] <bluekuja> yeah, great
[07:04] <bluekuja> well, I really dont know whats wrong here
[07:05] <bluekuja> build hangs at AC_PROG point
[07:05] <bluekuja> with an error 2
[07:07] <bluekuja> asac: I have to leave now....will you be on tomorrow?
[07:07] <bluekuja> or late evening?
[07:07] <asac> i am here
[07:07] <bluekuja> great
[07:07] <asac> if not i will be back  :)
[07:07] <asac> i pull clean now
[07:07] <bluekuja> hehehe :D
[07:08] <bluekuja> can you send me by email your files?
[07:08] <bluekuja> so I can check whats wrong
[07:08] <bluekuja> asac: do you think that after fixing this, .xpm and .png error will be ok?
[07:08] <asac> (feisty2)asac@hector:~/ubuntu_revu/gtorrent-viewer-0.2b$ aclocal-1.10
[07:09] <asac> (feisty2)asac@hector:~/ubuntu_revu/gtorrent-viewer-0.2b$ autoconf
[07:09] <asac> autoconf      autoconf2.13  autoconf2.50
[07:09] <asac> (feisty2)asac@hector:~/ubuntu_revu/gtorrent-viewer-0.2b$ autoconf2.50
[07:09] <asac> (feisty2)asac@hector:~/ubuntu_revu/gtorrent-viewer-0.2b$ automake-1.10 -a -f -c
[07:09] <asac> src/Makefile.am: installing `./depcomp'
[07:09] <asac> src/Makefile.am:8: `CFLAGS' is a user variable, you should not override it;
[07:09] <asac> src/Makefile.am:8: use `AM_CFLAGS' instead.
[07:09] <asac> (feisty2)asac@hector:~/ubuntu_revu/gtorrent-viewer-0.2b$ dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -bdpkg-buildpackage: source package is gtorrent-viewer
[07:09] <asac> dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.2b-1
[07:09] <asac> dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by Andrea Veri <bluekuja@ubuntu.com>
[07:09] <asac> dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture amd64
[07:09] <asac> dpkg-buildpackage: source version without epoch 0.2b-1 fakeroot debian/rules clean
[07:09] <asac> dh_testdir
[07:09] <asac> dh_testroot
[07:09] <asac> rm -f build-stamp
[07:09] <asac> # Add here commands to clean up after the build process.
[07:09] <asac> dh_clean  debian/rules build
[07:09] <asac> dh_testdir
[07:09] <asac> # Add here commands to configure the package.
[07:09] <asac> CFLAGS="-Wall -g -O2 -Wl,-z,defs" ./configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=\${prefix}/share/man --infodir=\${prefix}/share/info
[07:09] <asac> checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
[07:09] <asac> checking whether build environment is sane... yes
[07:09] <asac> ups sorry
[07:10] <asac> it works
[07:10] <asac> yes its fixed here now
[07:10] <asac> just the above
[07:10] <asac> done
[07:11] <asac> i have no autoconf2.6
[07:11] <asac> bluekuja: maybe thats the problem for you+
[07:11] <asac> oh its 2.61 ... so nevermind
[07:12] <bluekuja> asac: after fixing this, .png and .xpm problem will be ok?
[07:14] <asac> y
[07:14] <bluekuja> asac: well the only thing that seems to be not working is the on you said before
[07:15] <bluekuja> asac: AC_PROG_
[07:15] <bluekuja> asac: i get it and it hangs
[07:15] <asac> yeah ... thats on you to figure out ;)
[07:16] <asac> i have no problems
[07:16] <bluekuja> I'm getting version 2.50 and 2.12 of auto/make/conf
[07:16] <bluekuja> *2.13
[07:16] <asac> read above
[07:16] <asac> its all in there
[07:16] <asac> got to go
[07:17] <bluekuja> thanks a lot asac
[07:17] <bluekuja> I'll look for you
[07:17] <bluekuja> ;)
[07:29] <gnomefreak> asac: trunk is failing with ./debian/rules:29: /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/tarball.mk: No such file or directory
[07:29] <gnomefreak> ./debian/rules:30: /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk: No such file or directory
[07:29] <gnomefreak> ./debian/rules:31: /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/patchsys-quilt.mk: No such file or directory
[07:29] <gnomefreak> ./debian/rules:32: /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/autotools.mk: No such file or directory
[07:29] <gnomefreak> make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/share/cdbs/1/class/autotools.mk'.  Stop.
[07:30] <gnomefreak> i am gonan work on it to see whats going on but this is all done by ./debian/rules neworig  and i found the lines in rules but not sure why its not working.
[07:30] <asac> yeah
[07:31] <asac> you are missing build-depends
[07:31] <asac> install them first
[07:31] <asac> then you can regen
[07:31] <asac> especially you miss cdbs gnomefreak
[07:31] <gnomefreak> hmmm than apt-get build-dep is borked
[07:31] <asac> ok shopping
[07:31] <asac> yeah
[07:31] <asac> install manually
[07:31] <gnomefreak> it should have pulled them in :(
[07:31] <gnomefreak> ok ill grab them and try go shopping :)
[07:32] <asac> yeah but you miss at least cdbs
[07:32] <asac> if not quilt as well
[07:34] <gnomefreak> Reading state information... Done
[07:34] <gnomefreak> quilt is already the newest version.
[07:34] <gnomefreak> autotools-dev is already the newest version.
[07:34] <gnomefreak> cdbs is already the newest version.
[07:34] <gnomefreak> debhelper is already the newest version.
[07:34] <gnomefreak> thats not it :(
[07:34] <gnomefreak> oh wait
[07:36] <gnomefreak> nvm i had them in chroot not in base sysnad neworig wont build in chroot so i have to build it in base sys and build package in chroot
[08:05] <asac> actually i think we should reject crash reports for edgy
[08:06] <asac> that are no regressions due to security update
[08:24] <hjmf> hmm, that will take out all the fun! (my fun)
[08:25] <hjmf> seriously, do you mean rejecting any new crash report from edgy?
[08:25] <hjmf> It will be safe, as most of them if not all, are instant dups of some other bug
[08:26] <hjmf> though I have no problem on retracing them and search for a dup as it is a nearly automated task
[09:29] <asac> right ... lets just keep this on the radar
[11:50] <gnomefreak> asac: you didnt remove the thenes-system-cario-fix patch from trunk branch?
[11:58] <gnomefreak> @schedule new_york
[11:58] <ubotu> Schedule for America/New_York: 01 May 11:00: Kernel Team | 01 May 14:00: Mozilla Team | 02 May 08:00: Edubuntu | 02 May 16:00: Xubuntu Developers | 03 May 12:00: Ubuntu Development Team | 08 May 16:00: Technical Board