[01:18] <Draconicus> I screwed up Beryl. It's being retarded, now. I'm gonna restart X. brb.
[04:03] <borschty_> what are the specs of the computers of the build-farm?
[04:39] <concept10> anyone moved to the feisty repo yet without any major problems?  ive been tracking the packages (some what) and dont see many changes that will effect the system..
[05:07] <RAOF> concept10: You mean the gusty repo, right?
[05:08] <RAOF> My KVM doesn't seem to be broken at the moment, but I wouldn't run gutsy in anything but an isolated environment at this point (chroot, VM).
[05:08] <concept10> RAOF, yep
[09:28] <aftertaf> any help available for wifi being dead right now?
[09:28] <aftertaf> er sorry... Hi all :)
[09:30] <Hobbsee> hi aftertaf
[09:32] <aftertaf> hi Hobbsee :)
[09:32] <aftertaf> how are you?
[09:33] <Hobbsee> good - at uds
[09:34] <aftertaf> uds?
[09:36] <Hobbsee> ubuntu developers summit
[09:36] <aftertaf> oooohhhh nice
[09:36] <aftertaf> anyone know why wifi doesnt work in gitsy right now? :D
[09:36] <Hobbsee> sure.  merges arent done yet.
[09:37] <Hobbsee> it's not supposed to work right now
[09:37] <aftertaf> i went gutsy cos official release kernel in feisty just would not boot on my machine, and so no nvidia because other version i didnt have the kernel headers.......
[09:37] <aftertaf> oh ok :)
[09:37] <aftertaf> loool
[09:37] <aftertaf> merges ie cvs code updates, right?
[09:41] <Hobbsee> upstream versions + debian changes + ubuntu changes == merge
[09:43] <aftertaf> ok. any previsions on merge finish ?
[09:43] <aftertaf> vaguely....
[09:45] <Hobbsee> "when it's done"
[09:45] <Hobbsee> "depends on how many people helo"
[09:46] <aftertaf> hehe
[09:47] <Hobbsee> er, help
[10:27] <PriceChild> !guts
[10:27] <ubotu> Sorry, I don't know anything about guts - try searching on http://bots.ubuntulinux.nl/factoids.cgi
[10:28] <PriceChild> !gutsy
[10:28] <ubotu> Gutsy Gibbon is the code name for the next release of Ubuntu (7.10). See https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-announce/2007-April/000276.html and https://wiki.ubuntu.com/GutsyReleaseSchedule Support in #ubuntu+1
[10:28] <aftertaf> lol
[10:36] <fb33> why when I launch beryl-manager I get a black screen?
[12:50] <jacque1> hi
[12:53] <Seeker`> hi
[01:35] <fuoco> anyone knows of a page that shows a 'diff' list of packages between feisty and gutsy?
[01:59] <gnomefreak> fuoco: what package?
[01:59] <fuoco> gnomefreak: i mean a general list of all packages, to see which ones are newer in gutsy compared to feisty
[02:00] <gnomefreak> fuoco: get the sources for both and debdiff them
[02:00] <gnomefreak> fuoco: maybe packages.ubuntu.com has them
[02:01] <fuoco> hmm
[02:03] <borschty_> or download Packages.gz of both, extract and diff them
[02:04] <borschty_> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/gutsy-changes/ or maybe this page could be helpful
[02:08] <gnomefreak> fuoco: changelog file will tell you but you need the source. you can try just the .diff and the .dsc but should list feisty and gutsy in changelog
[04:38] <Turms> is there any repo of medibuntu-sos-sts for gutsy?
[05:51] <gnomefreak> Turms: i doubt it. normally 3rd party repos come around near end of devel cycle
[05:51] <gnomefreak> anything before that is usless
[06:07] <Turms> gnomefreak: thanks :-)
[06:07] <gnomefreak> YW
[06:07] <gnomefreak> oops
[06:07] <Turms> :-)
[07:10] <TheCreationist> Where can I go to request features for the Gutsy installer?
[07:15] <ToHellWithGA> TheCreationist: in a spec perhaps?
[07:15] <ToHellWithGA> or on a wish list
[07:15] <TheCreationist> ToHellWithGA: Right... but does Ubuntu have an official Feature Request system?
[07:16] <ToHellWithGA> TheCreationist: it does, wish lists
[07:16] <TheCreationist> ok
[07:17] <ToHellWithGA> i dunno where to find the wish lists, but i'd think launchpad would be a good place to look
[07:18] <rollerskatejamms> Anybody know how to roll back after installing a metapackage?
[11:10] <Lordveda> Is there a constant devel branch for the ubuntu distribution
[11:11] <Lordveda> I know I can add repositories to apt-get
[11:11] <Lordveda> no answer
[11:11] <Lordveda> cool
[11:22] <Lordveda> I think there should be a constant devel tree in ubuntu. This is the same for debian, Redhat and other distributions.
[11:23] <DeepB> i agree
[11:25] <Lordveda> For those who like to have recent softwares that are stable, this should be present in such a tree.
[11:26] <concept10> I second that... (or third)  for those who want the latest libraries and such
[11:27] <concept10> Lordveda, we should do some work in the community to propose that