[11:47] <gnomefreak> asac: you up yet?
[11:52] <asac> sure
[11:53] <asac> currently spinnin iceape to see whats going on :)
[11:53] <asac> are there warnings?
[11:53] <asac> for certs ?
[11:53] <gnomefreak> dealing with the stupid undeliverable
[11:54] <asac> undeliveralbe?
[11:54] <gnomefreak> not since ffox upgrade. i havent checked with iceape yet
[11:54] <asac> mail bomb?
[11:54] <gnomefreak> bug 114943
[11:54] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 114943 in firefox "[EDGY]  firefox crashed [@gtk_style_realize]  [@IA__gtk_style_attach] " [High,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/114943
[11:54] <gnomefreak> yes
[11:54] <asac> ah
[11:54] <gnomefreak> i just pinged guys in #launchpad about it
[11:54] <asac> thats not a problem :)
[11:55] <asac> yeah ... would be nice to here how debian bts deals with that kind of flood
[11:55] <gnomefreak> whats wrong with totem-xine?
[11:56] <asac> totem-xine is broken :)
[11:56] <asac> does not work in mozilla
[11:56] <asac> e.g. as embed plugin
[11:56] <gnomefreak> it doesnt?
[11:56] <asac> its not supported anyway :)
[11:56] <asac> so use is discouraged
[11:56] <asac> gstreamer is viable alternative
[11:56] <gnomefreak> oh
[11:57] <gnomefreak> xine plays more formats out of box
[11:57] <asac> doesn't matter :)
[11:58] <asac> gstreamer works nowadays as well
[11:58] <asac> in edgy xine supports more formats
[11:58] <asac> in feisty i haven't seen a thing that gstreamer cannot plays
[11:58] <gnomefreak> oh ok
[12:01] <gnomefreak> whats wrong with iceape?
[12:02] <gnomefreak> just the certs issue?
[12:03] <asac> have no idea
[12:03] <asac> i even don't know if there is a cert issue
[12:03] <asac> :)
[12:03] <asac> now starting my build :)
[12:03] <asac> lets see
[12:04] <gnomefreak> it seemst o remmeber them atm
[12:04] <asac> ok there is an issue
[12:04] <gnomefreak> what issue?
[12:04] <asac> fairly easy to solve though :)
[12:04] <asac> ca cert not recognized
[12:04] <gnomefreak> i got 2 of them from LP a little while ago restarted iceape and didnt get it again
[12:05] <gnomefreak> ok this is odd
[12:06] <gnomefreak> im not sure i like this at all :(
[12:06] <gnomefreak> maybe ill ping ben later about this
[12:06] <gnomefreak> brb smoke
[12:09] <asac> you probably selected "accept certificate forever"
[12:11] <gnomefreak> i always do
[12:16] <asac> sure :) ... at least the gtk_style_realize crash is mostly fixed
[12:17] <gnomefreak> someone stated it was bad in thier own words
[12:17] <asac> that it didn't crash anymore?
[12:18] <asac> ok iceape appears to be ready
[12:18] <asac> i pushed my changes
[12:18] <asac> to bzr
[12:18] <asac> now sending up
[12:18] <gnomefreak> 06:10 <          topyli > i wouldn't use firefox as a benchmark for anything  though :)
[12:18] <gnomefreak> 06:11 <           kaukx > qiuite a bit ? firefox on feisty is a crash master!!!!
[12:18] <gnomefreak> 06:11 <           orbin > kaukx: ah, so i'm not alone. :)
[12:18] <gnomefreak> asac: ty ill update in a bit
[12:20] <asac> user trolls or what?
[12:21] <gnomefreak> topyli isnt hes been around for a long time the other 2 ive never seen or dont remember seeing
[12:24] <asac> being around for long time is typically a property of a troll as well :)
[12:27] <gnomefreak> true
[12:28] <gnomefreak> maybe make it for next ubuntu release
[12:28] <gnomefreak> what file hold the prefferences?
[12:31] <gnomefreak> think i found it
[12:32] <gnomefreak> pref("browser.toolbars.showbutton.go",      false);   think we should change that to true
[12:33] <gnomefreak> right now without it it opens the search panel like if you typed launchpad.net <enter> it will open search panel. i changed mine locally in prefferneces menu
[12:51] <gnomefreak> lol 1 theme for seamonkey on mozilla site
[12:52] <gnomefreak> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/search?q=seamonkey+themes&status=4
[12:53] <asac> its already uploaded
[12:57] <gnomefreak> im talking for ubuntu2
[12:57] <gnomefreak> when we have a list to do
[12:59] <gnomefreak> since ubuntu is concidered modern would you have issues in changing default theme from classic to modern at the same time of the showbutton change? and ubuntu2 with any bug fixes we can fit in (would like a fairly long list of items before jumping to ubuntu2 unless we have to respin for some odd reason
[12:59] <gnomefreak> )
[01:01] <gnomefreak> but not sure about the theme change (since debain ships with classic)
[01:04] <asac> i have no opinion on that
[01:04] <asac> :)
[01:04] <asac> its your package
[01:04] <asac> i will just review and upload whats in bzr
[01:10] <gnomefreak> k :)
[01:20] <gnomefreak> ok i made a iceape to do list :)
[01:21] <asac> thats good .... maybe use bugs for that :)
[01:21] <asac> once there is a package in the archive where you can file against
[01:23] <gnomefreak> yep :)
[01:27] <gnomefreak> will Depends: iceape-browser (>= ${source:Upstream-Version}-0), iceape-browser (<= ${source:Version}.1~)  need to be changed with every upload?
[01:29] <asac> nope
[01:29] <gnomefreak> k
[01:30] <asac> i am a bit unsure why mike added that kind of depends range at all
[01:30] <asac> as if there will be a "just iceape-browser" update at some point
[01:30] <asac> which is far from going to happen soon
[01:30] <gnomefreak> yeah i dont see that happening since everything is built in
[01:30] <asac> right
[01:31] <asac> maybe at some point we can split the package in multiple sources
[01:31] <asac> e.g. source per component
[01:31] <asac> but for that there needs to be upstream fixage all over :)
[01:32] <gnomefreak> yeah, i think its better as is since you can change one package and not affect the others
[01:51] <gnomefreak> did you ever fix enigmail in gutsy?
[01:52] <gnomefreak> yep looks like it
[02:08] <asac> should be in
[02:08] <asac> hanged in NEW
[02:08] <asac> in binary NEW ... and unfortunately no mail is send for binary NEW
[02:08] <asac> :(
[02:08] <asac> so i didn't notice
[04:02] <gnomefreak> if binary NEW doesnt send email how do you know if it fails or passes?
[04:05] <asac> hehe
[04:05] <asac> no idea :)
[04:05] <asac> hope that NEW people do a decent job
[04:05] <asac> watch if it becomes available for download on archive mirrors
[04:05] <asac> etc.
[04:06] <gnomefreak> im waiting for the gutsy changes ML post for it that should be a sign it will hit archives soon after
[04:08] <asac> j
[04:08] <asac> y
[04:09] <gnomefreak> good thing is i havent had it crash on me once since we first added it to repo
[04:09] <asac> which?
[04:09] <asac> enig?
[04:09] <gnomefreak> no iceape
[04:10] <gnomefreak> enigmail works great
[04:10] <asac> ah ... right
[04:10] <asac> :)
[04:10] <gnomefreak> that hasnt crashed either
[04:10] <asac> yes
[04:10] <asac> its getting better every time
[04:11] <gnomefreak> i was happy i went through it and it gave me choice to set it up for all identies
[04:11] <asac> cool
[04:11] <asac> :)
[04:11] <asac> even me noticed a difference ... which means "a lot must have changed"
[04:11] <asac> :)
[04:12] <gnomefreak> :)
[04:12] <gnomefreak> moron trying to put ntfs partition *inside* ext3 partition and wants grub to boot to it
[04:12] <asac> hehe
[04:13] <gnomefreak> asac: have you seen but 111940 yet? i am kind of wondering why its against hunspell if hunspell isnt the issue
[04:14] <asac> bug 111940
[04:14] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 111940 in hunspell "libhunspell-1.1-0 1.1.5-6: Incompatible ABI change" [High,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/111940
[04:14] <gnomefreak> oops bug yes not but
[04:15] <asac> we have no problem from that
[04:15] <asac> its only openoffice that needs a respin
[04:15] <asac> point is that openoffice build currently fails :) ... so no respin available yet ;)
[04:16] <gnomefreak> ha
[04:16] <asac> afaik it fails because of something java related
[04:16] <gnomefreak> i havent heard that yet but yeah i had oo.o crash on me while checking that bug
[04:18] <gnomefreak> can i reject the hunspell task?
[04:20] <gnomefreak> asac: have we heard of .5 release of sunbird yet?
[04:21] <asac> keep the hunspell task
[04:21] <asac> its not yet decided if we want to change soname ... which would be unfortunate because the current soname is an upstream agreed one
[04:22] <gnomefreak> soname of hunspell?
[04:22] <asac> yes
[04:22] <asac> problem is that there is abi breakage, but soname was not bumped
[04:22] <asac> problem was that we pulled in a debian experimental package
[04:22] <gnomefreak> yeah thats good
[04:23] <asac> and now we have the mess, debian maintainer agreed on the same soname he used in his experimental version
[04:23] <gnomefreak> arnt we merging fron there anyway?
[04:23] <asac> but for an incompatible package
[04:23] <gnomefreak> ah
[04:23] <asac> and of course, there is no way to tell them: bump soname
[04:23] <asac> diverging soname from them would be quite unfortunate either
[04:23] <gnomefreak> lol that is a damn mess
[04:23] <asac> anyway, no final decision
[04:24] <gnomefreak> once we know we have to rebuild everything depending on it "oh what fun"
[04:31] <asac> we have to respin anyway :)
[04:31] <asac> otherwise we crash :(
[04:31] <asac> happely there are just mozillas and openoffice afaik
[04:35] <gnomefreak> yep
[04:41] <gnomefreak> asac: have you seen bug 60995 upstream is mozilla 358764
[04:41] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 60995 in firefox "The backspace key pages up instead of going back in history" [Wishlist,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/60995
[04:41] <ubotu> Mozilla bug 358764 in Keyboard Navigation "On Linux, backspace should do nothing" [Trivial,Resolved: fixed]  http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358764
[04:41] <gnomefreak> or has it already been fixed in 2.0.0.3
[04:43] <gnomefreak> i dont have ffox source atm to check
[04:44] <asac> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358764#c4
[04:44] <asac> :)
[04:44] <ubotu> Mozilla bug 358764 in Keyboard Navigation "On Linux, backspace should do nothing" [Trivial,Resolved: fixed] 
[04:45] <asac> crazy man
[04:46] <gnomefreak> its not fixed here in gutsy (personally i dont see why it should. my backspace pages up
[04:47] <asac> its fixed on trunk
[04:47] <asac> but not fixed in the way people wished :)
[04:47] <asac> new behaviour is: just do nothing
[04:47] <gnomefreak> asac: can you comment and close it as you wish
[04:47] <asac> people will probably scream again
[04:47] <asac> we keep it open until this lands on the branch
[04:47] <asac> :)
[04:47] <gnomefreak> ok
[04:48] <asac> or we move to ffox3
[04:49] <gnomefreak> it wont be fixed in edgy nor feisty as they wish anyway
[04:49] <asac> right
[04:50] <asac> gnomefreak: i rejected it :)
[04:51] <asac> let the mob appear
[04:51] <asac> ;)
[04:51] <gnomefreak> epiphany does nothing at all
[04:51] <asac> yes
[04:51] <asac> like ffox in future
[04:51] <asac> just don't read the mail of trolls that will inevitably now appear
[04:52] <gnomefreak> lol
[04:57] <asac> gnomefreak: tbird 1.5 wsill be supported upstream till autumn
[04:57] <asac> i need to figure things out before i can say anything on how we will approach this
[04:58] <gnomefreak> oh ther eis a date now?
[04:58] <gnomefreak> or is that just tbird?
[05:00] <asac> tbird
[05:00] <asac> ffox will have one more release
[05:00] <asac> 1.5.0.13 that is??
[05:00] <asac> and then gone
[05:01] <asac> i am currently trying to figure out how to best query bugzilla to see what fixes are scheduled for the release after that
[05:01] <asac> so i can look how hard it will be to backport stuff in time
[05:04] <gnomefreak> asac: problem if you backport for feisty you also have to do edgy and dapper
[05:04] <gnomefreak> i see big issues with 2.0 on dapper for either
[05:05] <asac> no edgy has 2.0
[05:05] <asac> i just would backport for dapper
[05:05] <asac> 2.0 is still supported for some tim
[05:05] <gnomefreak> your taking a stable (LTS) release and bringing in fairly unstable packages
[05:06] <gnomefreak> edgy and feisty would get tbird 2.0 not sure what version dapper has atm
[05:06] <asac> yeah ... but better then no providing support at all :)
[05:06] <gnomefreak> !mozilla-thunderbird dapper
[05:06] <asac> idea is to keep backporting for a while
[05:06] <asac> and see how long that is going
[05:06] <asac> as stated in official memo
[05:06] <gnomefreak> !info mozilla-thunderbird dapper
[05:06] <ubotu> mozilla-thunderbird: Mozilla Thunderbird standalone mail client. In component main, is optional. Version 1.5.0.10-0ubuntu0.6.06 (dapper), package size 10104 kB, installed size 28800 kB
[05:07] <gnomefreak> there was an official memo?
[05:11] <gnomefreak> ill be back im heading to lunch
[05:23] <asac> bon appetite
[05:23] <asac> gnomefreak: yes in wiki
[05:23] <asac> and bug
[05:24] <asac> where the troll rule atm
[05:24] <asac> i banned it from my inbox for now because i couldn't stand the whining anymore
[05:24] <asac> better ignore then jump in and feed the trolls :)
[05:48] <asac> gnomefreak: i am thinking about improving how we merge iceape from debian
[05:49] <asac> maybe you can run a diff on the two orig.tar.gz balls (e.g. debians vs. ours) ... and show it to me?
[05:49] <asac> recursive diff :)
[05:49] <asac> with diff -ur mozilla.from.debian.orig/ mozilla.from.ubuntu.orig
[05:49] <asac> with diff -Nurp mozilla.from.debian.orig/ mozilla.from.ubuntu.orig
[05:50] <asac> e.g. name mozilla dir from debian orig like mozilla.from.debian.orig ... and same for ubuntu one
[05:50] <asac> gnomefreak: ^^^^
[05:50] <asac> thanks
[06:07] <gnomefreak> ok let me see if i can find the orig.tar for debian
[06:09] <gnomefreak> what do you mean mozilla.from.*
[06:16] <gnomefreak> you just want the diffs from the mozilla dir?
[06:29] <gnomefreak> our mozilla dir in orig is empty
[06:35] <gnomefreak> debians doesnt have a mozilla dir at all
[06:38] <gnomefreak> i unpacked the 2 orig.tars and running diff on the unpacked dirs. using gnomefreak@Gutsy:~/diff_iceape$ diff -ur iceape-1.1.1.orig/ ubuntu-1.1.x/  since the mozilla dirs are useless
[06:46] <gnomefreak> trying something different
[06:52] <asac> no ... you have to compare both mozilla dirs
[06:52] <asac> don't use dpkg-source to unpack
[06:52] <asac> but tar
[06:52] <asac> directly
[06:52] <asac> e.g. compare just pristing orig content
[06:53] <gnomefreak> debian has no mozilla and ubuntus is enpty
[06:56] <asac> hey
[06:56] <asac> you will figure out :)
[06:56] <asac> just read this: you have two tarballs right?
[06:56] <asac> idea is to compare contents of both
[06:56] <asac> nothing more
[06:56] <gnomefreak> yes
[06:57] <asac> :)
[06:57] <gnomefreak> i also have a dir with the dsc and diffs for both
[06:57] <asac> that is completely irrelevant atm :)
[06:57] <gnomefreak> 2 seperate dirs. seeing what one would giive me an answer
[06:57] <asac> the idea is to get a diff of orig.tar.gz content
[06:57] <asac> the rest you can delete for this ;)
[06:58] <asac> just download orig.tar.gz
[06:58] <asac> of both
[06:58] <asac> then compare :)
[06:58] <gnomefreak> cant
[06:58] <asac> k
[06:59] <gnomefreak> cant run diff against orig.tar.gz it gives me binarys are differnet
[06:59] <gnomefreak> thats all it gives me
[06:59] <gnomefreak> if i unpack them i get .bzr line and one other line
[07:00] <asac> yeah
[07:00] <asac> extract
[07:00] <asac> compare resulting dirs
[07:00] <asac> thats the idea
[07:00] <gnomefreak> basicly saying that uubuntu has a bzr and something else that debian doesnt
[07:01] <gnomefreak> once my proc stopps lagging i will show you the 2 lines of uoutput
[07:01] <asac> we are talking about comparing mozilla/ trees in orig.tar.gz, right?
[07:03] <asac> ok the diretory is not called mozilla/ but iceape.ubuntu-1.1.1 or somethign like that
[07:05] <gnomefreak> yes
[07:05] <gnomefreak> the source dirs from each orig.tar
[07:06] <gnomefreak> running diff on them gives me nothing but 2 lines unless i dpkg-source -x file.dsc
[07:06] <gnomefreak> than it gives me 1000+ lines of output
[07:06] <gnomefreak> expected result
[07:07] <gnomefreak> ill give you the 2 lines it gives me in a minute
[07:10] <gnomefreak> gnomefreak@Gutsy:~/diff_iceape$ diff -ur iceape-1.1.1.orig/ ubuntu-1.1.x/ 2>&1 | tee diff1.txt   <<< waiting for that to output something atm
[07:13] <asac> did you download a fresh debian orig? from ftp.debian.org?
[07:14] <gnomefreak> from packages.debian.org
[07:14] <gnomefreak> Only in ubuntu-1.1.x/: .bzr
[07:14] <gnomefreak> Only in ubuntu-1.1.x/: mozilla
[07:14] <asac> k
[07:14] <gnomefreak> those are the 2 lines i meant
[07:14] <asac> oh ... so you have mozilla in ubuntu-1.1.x ?
[07:14] <gnomefreak> IMHO that isnt helpful
[07:14] <asac> maybe diff on that instead of ubuntu-1.1.x
[07:15] <gnomefreak> its empty
[07:15] <gnomefreak> mozilla dir in ubuntu-1.1* is empty no hidden files no nothing
[07:17] <gnomefreak> you want me to try diff -ur iceape-1.1.1.orig/ ubuntu-1.1.x/mozilla 2>&1 | tee diff1.txt
[07:17] <gnomefreak> should output nothing
[07:24] <asac> so you claim that debian orig.tar.gz file is empty?
[07:24] <asac> or ubuntu one?
[07:24] <asac> i can't believe that ... really ... you did something wrong
[07:24] <asac> :)
[07:27] <gnomefreak> asac: the mozilla dir is missing from debian and empty in ubuntus
[07:27] <asac> yeah ... there should be no mozilla dir
[07:27] <asac> your ubuntu tarball is borked
[07:27] <gnomefreak> if you want output simular to @@ -1,4 +0,0 @@
[07:27] <gnomefreak> -#!/bin/sh
[07:27] <gnomefreak> -
[07:27] <gnomefreak> -echo "Mozilla has been replaced by Iceape. Extensions still using update-mozilla-chrome"
[07:27] <gnomefreak> -echo "should be updated"
[07:27] <asac> try the one you have on net
[07:27] <gnomefreak> than i need to unpack the .dsc and run diff against source dirs than
[07:28] <asac> no
[07:28] <asac> :)
[07:28] <asac> what size has your orig.tar.gz
[07:28] <gnomefreak> the one i have is the one i uploaded to revu
[07:28] <asac> you extracted
[07:28] <gnomefreak> 40.5mb
[07:28] <gnomefreak> thats tared up
[07:29] <asac> yep
[07:29] <gnomefreak> unpacked is over 100 mb
[07:29] <gnomefreak> its still counting
[07:29] <gnomefreak> over 200MB
[07:29] <asac> maybe try tomorrow :)
[07:29] <asac> it will definitly work ;)
[07:29] <asac> otherwise i will do when come around :)
[07:29] <gnomefreak> 205.6MB
[07:30] <gnomefreak> the command i ran was correct right?
[07:30] <asac> the diff was ok
[07:30] <asac> but your directory setup was probably wrong
[07:30] <asac> messing something up when extracting tarball :)
[07:33] <gnomefreak> lets wait until it hits archive and get it from there if you feel something is wrong. i dont know why there is a ubuntu-1.1.x/mozilla  that is empty and no iceape-1.1.1.orig/mozilla but that doesnt matter too much since you want the diff of the source dirs. so i ran diff on iceape-1.1.1.orig/ ubuntu-1.1.x/
[07:33] <asac> it must be your tarball ... you probably didn't remove the mozilla dir after moving contents one dir up
[07:34] <asac> so does iceape dir and ubuntu dir have about the same size?
[07:34] <gnomefreak> yes] 
[07:35] <gnomefreak> 1MB or so off
[07:35] <asac> k
[07:35] <asac> how long did the diff command run?
[07:35] <gnomefreak> i ran mv mozilla/* . and mv mozilla/.?* . but mv mozilla/.?* . failed due to it was busy 30 minutes after running the first one
[07:36] <gnomefreak> 2 minutes or so
[07:36] <gnomefreak> give or take
[07:36] <asac> k
[07:36] <asac> apparently the ubuntu rebranding is wrong in your tarball then
[07:36] <asac> because thats the only changes expected
[07:36] <asac> if you have no difference there is something wrong :)
[07:37] <gnomefreak> i only get them after unpacking .dsc (i get all changes)
[07:37] <asac> yeah that isn't what i am looking for
[07:37] <asac> :)
[07:37] <gnomefreak> and they run 5+ minutes
[07:37] <asac> we run remove.nonfree
[07:37] <asac> you remember
[07:37] <gnomefreak> yes
[07:37] <asac> to patch orig.tarball
[07:37] <asac> we change debian to ubuntu
[07:37] <asac> so there should be difference in the sourcetree
[07:37] <gnomefreak> correct
[07:37] <asac> right
[07:38] <asac> wait ... i push my orig.tar.gz
[07:38] <gnomefreak> asac: should i try running it against ubuntu-1.1.x/debian?
[07:38] <gnomefreak> and debian dir in debians source
[07:38] <asac> no
[07:38] <gnomefreak> k
[07:38] <asac> just orig.tar.gz content
[07:38] <asac> nothing else is of concern here :)
[07:39] <gnomefreak> Only in ubuntu-1.1.x/: .bzr
[07:39] <gnomefreak> Only in ubuntu-1.1.x/: mozilla
[07:39] <gnomefreak> those seema  bit general
[07:39] <asac> gnomefreak: right
[07:39] <asac> please try my ubuntu orig :)
[07:39] <gnomefreak> thats why i was thinking in /debian
[07:39] <gnomefreak> where is it?
[07:39] <asac> it will be in http://people.ubuntu.com/~asac/ soon
[07:39] <asac> currently uploading
[07:39] <gnomefreak> k
[07:40] <asac> takes another 8 minutes to push
[07:40] <asac> slow upload with ~70 k
[07:40] <gnomefreak> thats ok take your timee
[07:40] <asac> 20 minutes -> meeting mofo
[07:40] <asac> in 20 min.
[07:40] <gnomefreak> k
[07:41] <gnomefreak> oh can you remove iceape revu once it hits repos
[07:41] <gnomefreak> ?
[07:42] <asac> no idea ... can i do that?
[07:42] <asac> i have all rights except admin i guess :)
[07:42] <gnomefreak> oh ok
[07:42] <gnomefreak> i thought reviewers were able to
[07:43] <gnomefreak> ill ask ajmitc_h after it hits archives if you cant do it
[07:44] <asac> gnomefreak: your orig.tar.gz is borked
[07:44] <asac> i wrote it in revu page
[07:44] <asac> so no wonder that diff doesn't work
[07:44] <asac> May 14 05:01 asac@jwsdot.com   redo orig.tar.gz in proper fashion will fix this
[07:44] <gnomefreak> could be a good reason
[07:44] <asac> that *IS* the reason
[07:44] <gnomefreak> that would be because the second mv command didnt work
[07:44] <asac> maybe
[07:44] <gnomefreak> cause i ran the first one
[07:44] <asac> i don't care :)
[07:45] <asac> ;)
[07:45] <gnomefreak> :)
[07:45] <asac> please keep your eyes more open next time :)
[07:45] <asac> now the good orig will be in my people account :)
[07:45] <gnomefreak> ok
[07:46] <asac> dunno :) ... better find it out instead of ignoring
[07:46] <asac> otherwise you will always get troubles ;)
[07:46] <gnomefreak> i will look at it more indepth tomorrow if i get time
[07:47] <gnomefreak> ok wgetting it atm
[07:47] <asac> hey not yet finished :)
[07:47] <asac> 30 seconds left
[07:48] <asac> 22
[07:48] <asac> 10
[07:48] <asac> 5
[07:48] <asac> 4
[07:48] <asac> 3
[07:48] <asac> 2
[07:48] <asac> 1
[07:48] <asac> finish
[07:48] <asac> gnomefreak: go
[07:49] <gnomefreak> :)
[07:53] <gnomefreak> btw restarted download ;)
[08:15] <asac> cool
[08:16] <asac> i will be off soon for a while
[08:16] <asac> will take a glance later
[08:17] <gnomefreak> ill post them somewhere and give you link to it/them
[08:29] <gnomefreak> did you want both the -ur and the -Nurp output?
[08:29] <gnomefreak> or just -Nurp
[08:30] <gnomefreak> ftp://youmortals.com/gnomefreak.youmortals.com/diff-ur.txt  and ftp://youmortals.com/gnomefreak.youmortals.com/diff-Nurp.txt  and the 2 files you wanted as i understood it
[08:31] <gnomefreak> crap
[08:31] <gnomefreak> http://gnomefreak.youmortals.com/diff-ur.txt and http://gnomefreak.youmortals.com/diff-Nurp.txt
[08:32] <gnomefreak> those are the right addresses. im off not lay down and try to rm -rf headache/from/hell
[08:58] <asac> i will have to look into this
[08:58] <asac> gnomefreak: ok
[08:59] <asac> this looks wierd
[08:59] <asac> either the remove.nonfree script is not doing what it should be or the tarball i used is borked :)
[09:41] <Adri2000> heya
[09:43] <Adri2000> libxul-dev have unmet deps in gutsy, seems that it needs to be transitioned. is anyone going to do it?
[09:50] <asac> what deps are unmet?
[09:50] <asac> Adri2000: ?
[09:51] <Adri2000>   libxul-dev: Depends: libnss3-dev (= 1.8.0.10-3ubuntu1) but it is not going to be installed
[09:51] <Adri2000>               Depends: libnspr4-dev (= 1.8.0.10-3ubuntu1) but it is not going to be installed
[09:51] <Adri2000>               Depends: libmozjs-dev (= 1.8.0.10-3ubuntu1) but it is not going to be installed
[09:51] <asac> ok
[09:51] <asac> problem is that it has strict depends
[09:52] <asac> dunno about libmozjs-dev ... guess it has the same problem with strict libnss3-dev and libnspr4-dev
[09:52] <asac> this needs to be fixed
[09:52] <asac> Adri2000: can you try if merging latest from debian helps?
[09:52] <asac> it should fix everything
[09:54] <Adri2000> hmm ok, I will look at that
[09:55] <asac> yes ... just latest xulrunner should work
[09:56] <Adri2000> asac: libnss3-dev libnspr4-dev libmozjs-dev are now built from the firefox source package and no more from xulrunner, is that it?
[09:57] <asac> yes thats it
[09:57] <asac> but latest debian package should work
[09:57] <asac> debian has the same transition
[09:57] <Adri2000> ok
[09:58] <asac> someone just has to do the merge
[09:58] <asac> :)
[10:00] <asac> i can do tomorrow i guess
[10:00] <asac> should be straight forward
[10:01] <Adri2000> maybe a sync is enough, if the x86_64 build fixes have been included upstream
[10:01] <asac> i will look
[10:01] <asac> what the conflicts are
[10:01] <Adri2000> do you have a 64bits to test build it?
[10:01] <asac> maybe we need a conflict with firefox-dev
[10:01] <asac> i am on 64bits
[10:01] <asac> but that issue is definitly solved in debian
[10:02] <Adri2000> ok, so I'll let this merge for you :)
[10:05] <asac> k :)
[10:05] <asac> Adri2000: if you want, do it :)
[10:06] <Adri2000> no, don't worry, I have some other merges to do :p
[10:07] <asac> Adri2000: i am a merge o novice :)
[10:07] <asac> is there any garbage in the tar.gz provided?
[10:07] <asac> e.g. some DOT files?
[10:07] <asac> or just the conflicts in the files? .e.g. debian/control etc.
[10:07] <asac> ?
[10:07] <Adri2000> use the grab-merge.sh, it does everything for you
[10:08] <Adri2000> +script
[10:08] <asac> hmm
[10:09] <Adri2000> ./grab-merge.sh xulrunner, check the conflicts, update the changelog and build the source package
[10:09] <asac> >sure
[10:09] <asac> should i use my name in changelog ... or just keep merge o matic :)?
[10:10] <asac> stupid question, i know :)
[10:11] <Adri2000> well, I believe in the past there were some uploads with Merge-o-Matic in the changelog...
[10:11] <Adri2000> but, yes, better to put your name :)
[10:13] <asac> Adri2000: cool thanks for the short intro :)
[10:13] <asac> i think i can handle it now :)
[10:13] <asac> should probably help a bit on main in future :)
[10:17] <asac> ok night all
[11:37] <gnomefreak> asac: merged xulrunner? that is gonna mean all browsers need rebuild?