=== agoliveira [n=adilson@201.47.77.165.adsl.gvt.net.br] has joined #ubuntu-mobile === boredand1logging [n=nali@c-24-98-177-125.hsd1.ga.comcast.net] has joined #ubuntu-mobile === boredand1logging is now known as boredandblogging === boredandblogging [n=nali@ubuntu/member/boredandblogging] has joined #ubuntu-mobile === concept10 [n=concept1@ppp-70-247-163-181.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net] has joined #ubuntu-mobile === merriam__ [n=merriam@85-211-245-180.dyn.gotadsl.co.uk] has joined #ubuntu-mobile === boredandblogging [n=nali@ubuntu/member/boredandblogging] has joined #ubuntu-mobile === zul [n=chuck@ubuntu/member/zul] has joined #ubuntu-mobile === guerby [n=guerby@gut75-4-82-235-162-148.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-mobile === btraynor [n=btraynor@gromit.mixdown.ca] has joined #ubuntu-mobile === btraynor is now known as wmat === zul [n=chuck@CPE0006258ec6c1-CM000a73655d0e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has joined #ubuntu-mobile === boredandblogging [n=nali@ubuntu/member/boredandblogging] has joined #ubuntu-mobile === zul [n=chuck@ubuntu/member/zul] has joined #ubuntu-mobile === guerby [n=guerby@gut75-4-82-235-162-148.fbx.proxad.net] has joined #ubuntu-mobile === zul_ [n=chuck@CPE0006258ec6c1-CM000a73655d0e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has joined #ubuntu-mobile === boredandblogging [n=nali@ubuntu/member/boredandblogging] has joined #ubuntu-mobile === sabotage_afk [n=sbryan@jffwprtest.jf.intel.com] has joined #ubuntu-mobile === mdz [n=mdz@yttrium.canonical.com] has joined #ubuntu-mobile === jsgotangco [n=jsg123@ubuntu/member/jsgotangco] has joined #ubuntu-mobile [11:42] (lool/#ubuntu-mobile) mdz: I think recent dpkg-source have been fixed to ignore most bzr/git stuff they failed to ignore in the past [11:43] lool: ah, we haven't merged dpkg yet in gutsy [11:43] (lool/#ubuntu-mobile) tko: debian/ in upstream VCS is fine, but it's painful in tarballs [11:43] (lool/#ubuntu-mobile) mdz: Then you have a good motivation to do so :) === lool . o O ( I suppose the apt-getable archive isn't interesting for the tarballs if Ubuntu takes SVN snapshots of the upstream sources ) [11:46] (lool/#ubuntu-mobile) mdz: Are you recommending the use of native packages because it makes it easier to build/upload stuff from bzr checkouts? [11:47] lool: yep [11:47] lool: combined with the fact that there are no upstream tarball releases [11:52] would there be much benefit from us doing real tarball releases? [11:54] (lool/#ubuntu-mobile) tko: Speaking for Debian, which is currently *not* packaging hildon, there certainly would be benefit for other distros [12:01] right. annoying that being both upstream maintainer and packager doing so means extra work :-/ === zul [n=chuck@CPE0006258ec6c1-CM000a73655d0e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has joined #ubuntu-mobile [12:16] lool: do you know of any reason why Debian could not adopt Ubuntu's packages verbatim? [12:17] (lool/#ubuntu-mobile) mdz: Some developers have complained about the changelog entries, and they usually need some checks to meet Debian standards [12:17] (lool/#ubuntu-mobile) mdz: Check libhildon, it has a couple of lintian errors [12:18] (lool/#ubuntu-mobile) The copyright file is mostly clean, but Debian ftpmasters would require a download URL [12:18] (lool/#ubuntu-mobile) etc; [12:18] lool: I haven't seen tollef's new package, but with the old hildon-libs one, the only issue was the lack of descriptions [12:18] which we have a plan to clean up later, not blocking entry into the archive for that [12:18] (lool/#ubuntu-mobile) debhelper build-dep is >= 4 while debian/compat says 5 [12:19] lool: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/mobile-maemo-packaging-cleanup [12:19] I added incorrect debhelper deps to the list; please feel free to add other problems you find [12:20] (lool/#ubuntu-mobile) mdz: Thanks, didn't know about this spec [12:22] (lool/#ubuntu-mobile) mdz: Coincidentally, I wondered this morning on #debian-devel-french whether anybody would be interesting about having hildon packages in Debian, and mentionned some use cases [12:23] (lool/#ubuntu-mobile) It seems no awake french DD has particular interest on the packages though [12:23] if anyone has such an interest, please point them to bzr [12:23] so that we can stay in sync [12:24] (lool/#ubuntu-mobile) mdz: I will; any shared source repository for packages is always a good idea [12:28] (lool/#ubuntu-mobile) mdz: Is this MaemoPackagingCleanup supposed to happen on upstream debian/ or only in Ubuntu's bzr? [12:28] (lool/#ubuntu-mobile) Do some people here already commit on the upstream debian/? [12:29] all of our work will go into bzr [12:29] if it can be merged from there to upstream, that would be good [12:30] or if upstream would prefer to remove the packaging from svn and let that part happen in bzr, that's also ok [12:30] but we definitely want it to be decentralized [12:31] (lool/#ubuntu-mobile) (I understand that we want the changes to end up in the bzr, but I was wondering whether we could do them "upstream" in the SVN, and merge that in bzr from the upstream branch) [12:34] lool: the point of using bzr is that anyone can create a branch and we can easily merge between them [12:37] (lool/#ubuntu-mobile) Sure, I understand how Debian could create a debian branch and benefit from sharing the same repository; it's just that "upstream" is currently using SVN which makes me wonder whether changing debian/ in bzr is the best way to go -- but indeed, would they use bzr, they would have an easy time pulling the fixes :-) [12:44] lool: we require the ability to grant commit access, including the packaging, to ubuntu mobile developers === agoliveira [n=adilson@200.146.40.59.adsl.gvt.net.br] has joined #ubuntu-mobile [01:10] (lool/#ubuntu-mobile) Ah, dpkg-source -i doesn't work on native packages [01:11] (lool/#ubuntu-mobile) Needs -I.bzr instead === jsgotangco [n=jsg123@ubuntu/member/jsgotangco] has joined #ubuntu-mobile === TeTeT [n=spindler@modemcable178.77-70-69.static.videotron.ca] has joined #ubuntu-mobile === webjames [n=james@cpc1-oxfd9-0-0-cust930.oxfd.cable.ntl.com] has joined #ubuntu-mobile [02:39] Hello [02:39] is this the only information at the moment: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MobileAndEmbedded [02:41] will is have sms, and dialing using gsm? === zul_ [n=chuck@CPE0006258ec6c1-CM000a73655d0e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has joined #ubuntu-mobile [03:13] Mithrandir: hi === zul_ is now known as zul === zul [n=chuck@CPE0006258ec6c1-CM000a73655d0e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has joined #ubuntu-mobile === zul_ [n=chuck@CPE0006258ec6c1-CM000a73655d0e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has joined #ubuntu-mobile === zul [n=chuck@CPE0006258ec6c1-CM000a73655d0e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has joined #ubuntu-mobile === zul [n=chuck@CPE0006258ec6c1-CM000a73655d0e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has joined #ubuntu-mobile === agoliveira is now known as adilson-lunch [04:51] mdz: hiya [04:52] Mithrandir: checking in to see how the hildon packaging is going [04:52] webjames: that would depend on the people distributing hardware. We are currently working on the software stack and I am not aware of GSM capabilities of any of the current target platforms. [04:53] mdz: it's a public holiday in Norway so I'm not really here. [04:53] Mithrandir: oh, norway too? [04:53] yes. Doubly so, both Ascension day and constitution day. [04:54] so lots of people out in the streets with classical clothes on and such. [04:56] what fun [04:56] Mithrandir: let's catch up tomorrow then [04:57] sounds good. [04:57] have you seen any guide to what bits should be packaged first yet? === ferulo [n=fherrera@a88-115-27-99.elisa-laajakaista.fi] has joined #ubuntu-mobile === seb128 [n=seb128@ubuntu/member/seb128] has joined #ubuntu-mobile === sabotage_afk is now known as sabotage === adilson-lunch is now known as adilson === zul [n=chuck@CPE0006258ec6c1-CM000a73655d0e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has joined #ubuntu-mobile [05:52] Mithrandir: no response to my inquiries, suspect it may be a holiday in finland as well === zul [n=chuck@CPE0006258ec6c1-CM000a73655d0e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has joined #ubuntu-mobile === jsgotangco [n=jsg123@ubuntu/member/jsgotangco] has joined #ubuntu-mobile === zul [n=chuck@CPE0006258ec6c1-CM000a73655d0e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has joined #ubuntu-mobile [06:36] yup, it's holiday here === zul_ [n=chuck@CPE0006258ec6c1-CM000a73655d0e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has joined #ubuntu-mobile === zul [n=chuck@CPE0006258ec6c1-CM000a73655d0e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has joined #ubuntu-mobile === zul [n=chuck@CPE0006258ec6c1-CM000a73655d0e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has joined #ubuntu-mobile === zul [n=chuck@CPE0006258ec6c1-CM000a73655d0e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has joined #ubuntu-mobile [07:33] (lool/#ubuntu-mobile) Concerning the descriptions: I found out that Maemo has a nicely documented trademark policy, but it might be a bit painful to use this name in the source packages; there are plenty of rules to follow, such as using the (TM) symbol, or avoiding "based on maemo" in favor of "incorporating maemo"; so I recommend avoiding "maemo" altogether, except perhaps for the Homepage link [07:33] (lool/#ubuntu-mobile) Links to TM policies: http://maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-developers/2007-May/010234.html [07:42] lool: I've being looking at this a few days ago but, according to mdz, this should not be a problem as we are refering to maemo itself, not naming anything after it. [07:44] (lool/#ubuntu-mobile) I suppose it would be fair use; I wondered about it for a Debian "pkg-maemo" project === doko_ [n=doko@dslb-088-073-105-117.pools.arcor-ip.net] has joined #ubuntu-mobile === adilson is now known as adi-physiotherap === adi-physiotherap is now known as adilson === zul [n=chuck@CPE0006258ec6c1-CM000a73655d0e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has joined #ubuntu-mobile === zul [n=chuck@CPE0006258ec6c1-CM000a73655d0e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has joined #ubuntu-mobile === zul [n=chuck@CPE0006258ec6c1-CM000a73655d0e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com] has joined #ubuntu-mobile