[12:21] <keir> what's going to be in 1.1?
[12:21] <thumper> as things get approved, they'll be associated with the releases
[12:22] <thumper> it seems that 1.1.5 is May's one, 1.1.6 is June's
[12:23] <keir> fix released means it's already running on launchpad.net?
[12:27] <ajmitch> useful ones, sure
[12:29] <LaserJock> ajmitch: are you saying we don't have useful bugs? ;-)
[12:29] <ajmitch> LaserJock: yes
[12:29] <LaserJock> doh
[12:31] <Hobbsee_> darn.  networkmanager fell over
[12:32] <LaserJock> really? I've never heard of that happening </sarcasm>
[12:32] <thumper> Hobbsee_: I've noticed that a few times recently
[12:32] <Hobbsee_> it's unusual for it to happen here
[01:17] <welshbyte> launchpad's timing out when i go to a +filebug page, enter a summary and click continue - OOPS-505C856 ?
[01:17] <ubotu> https://devpad.canonical.com/~jamesh/oops.cgi/505C856
[01:31] <welshbyte> ah ha, it's working now... thanks
[03:55] <ubotu> New bug: #115893 in launchpad-bazaar "Publish what version of bzrlib Launchpad uses for code hosting" [Medium,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/115893
[04:05] <ubotu> New bug: #115896 in malone "Wrong upstream linking status (Closed/Fixed showed as Unknown)" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/115896
[04:43] <kiko-fud> yawn
[04:49] <LaserJock> hola kiko-fud 
[04:49] <kiko-fud> hey LaserJock 
[04:49] <kiko-fud> I'm zzzz/2
[04:51] <LaserJock> hmm, I wonder why people send "Don't send me any more emails" emails to launchpad-users
[04:51] <kiko-fud> because they are cluebies!
[04:52] <LaserJock> sometimes I want to email them and ask more info, but considering their email I don't think it'd be nice nor get much of anywhere
[05:06] <kiko-fud> heh, true
[06:00] <effie_jayx> beuno,  here 
[06:05] <beuno> effie_jayx: does this help: https://help.launchpad.net/RosettaFAQ#head-168f69f965337a49d0ca9a0c69da7fee29100bd5
[06:05] <effie_jayx> ok
[06:05] <effie_jayx> here is the thing
[06:06] <effie_jayx> singular and plural forms change depending of the gender
[06:06] <effie_jayx> example
[06:06] <effie_jayx> 0 items:  Awalaa  (brother / sister)
[06:06] <effie_jayx> 1 item:   Awalakai (hermano)  awalakal  (hermana)
[06:06] <effie_jayx>          2 items: Awalakana  (brothers)
[06:07] <effie_jayx> the prefixes change 
[06:07] <effie_jayx> akana is for both... so no issue there
[06:07] <effie_jayx> but singular the prefixes change depending of the gender
[06:08] <beuno> effie_jayx: I don't think rosetta handles "genders" in plurals
[06:09] <effie_jayx> ok
[06:09] <effie_jayx> so I will go for the first one... 
[06:09] <effie_jayx> the first one covers the two
[06:09] <effie_jayx>  0 items:  Awalaa  (brother / sister)
[06:09] <effie_jayx> but here the noun is in infinitive form
[06:11] <effie_jayx> beuno,  ok.,.. so who do I send this too :S
[06:12] <beuno> effie_jayx: you are trying to setup a new language or a specific package to translate?
[06:12] <effie_jayx> a new language
[06:14] <beuno> effie_jayx: 
[06:14] <beuno>     *
[06:14] <beuno>       If nobody has created a team for your language, e-mail [MAILTO]  rosetta@launchpad.net, including your language name, its ISO 639 code ("en", "fr", "es", etc.) and your launchpad.net ID, and the Rosetta team will make it happen.
[06:14] <beuno>       If it is a group of several translators who want to work on the same language, it's easier to create a Launchpad team for that purpose. [WWW]  Create a team and add all of your team mates to it, and tell the Rosetta team at [MAILTO]  rosetta@launchpad.net about it.
[06:14] <effie_jayx> beuno,  there is a team
[06:15] <effie_jayx> beuno,  https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-l10n-guc/
[06:17] <beuno> effie_jayx: I don't see it as a language to translate in Ubuntu: https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/feisty/
[06:17] <effie_jayx> beuno,  well.. I need to set up the plural forms for it to be avaliable
[06:17] <effie_jayx> the plural forms I got ready
[06:18] <effie_jayx> I shall send it to the team owner and see...
[06:18] <effie_jayx> Thanks for your help brother 
[06:18] <beuno> effie_jayx: ok, you might have to email them, but I'm not really sure what the process for it is...
[06:18] <effie_jayx> :D
[06:18] <beuno> sorry I couldn't be more helpful, and good luck with your nomination  :D
[06:20] <effie_jayx> beuno,  ahhh thanks :D
[06:27] <ardya> hi folks
[06:38] <cables> When I reply to something on Launchpad Answers using my email client, will it work if I don't sign the message?
[06:42] <Fujitsu> cables: AFAIK it only needs a signature if you're changing status etc. on Malone.
[06:43] <cables> Fujitsu, ok. There should be an option, btw, to make it require a signature for everything, and strip out the signature before the comment is displayed on the site.
[06:43] <Fujitsu> Telling me isn't going to do any good :(
[06:43] <cables> lol
[06:43] <cables> just mentioning it
[06:44] <Hobbsee> Fujitsu: fix all the bugs, kthxbye.
[06:45] <Fujitsu> Hobbsee: It would be nice to have the facility to.
[06:51] <jamesh> spiv, thumper: reviewers meeting in 10
[06:56] <thumper> k
[07:03] <jamesh> spiv, thumper: ping
[07:04] <thumper> jamesh: pong
[07:04] <spiv> pong
[07:04] <jamesh> okay, lets start
[07:04] <jamesh>  * Roll call
[07:04] <jamesh>  * Next meeting
[07:04] <jamesh>  * Queue status.
[07:04] <jamesh>  * Urgent review requests (lifeless for .au)
[07:04] <jamesh>  * New reviewers (lifeless for .au)
[07:05] <jamesh> welcome back spiv
[07:05] <spiv> Thanks :)
[07:05] <jamesh> should we try for the normal time next week?
[07:05] <thumper> my UTC0600 thing is each week
[07:05] <jamesh> or is it going to be difficult for thumper every week?
[07:06] <thumper> I'm ok on other days if that helps
[07:06] <thumper> it's just Monday
[07:06] <spiv> UTC0600 is fine any day of the week for me, it's in normal business hours.
[07:06] <jamesh> same here.
[07:07] <jamesh> so the constraints are when BjornT gets up and when thumper is busy
[07:07] <spiv> So is 0500, but that makes it harder for BjornT.
[07:07] <spiv> jamesh: welcome back :)
[07:07] <thumper> BjornT is in UTC+2?
[07:07] <thumper> or +1?
[07:08] <jamesh> I think he's +3 now
[07:08] <jamesh> TZ=Europe/Vilnius date '+%z'
[07:09] <jamesh> so, how does Tuesday 0600 UTC sound?
[07:09] <thumper> fine
[07:09] <jamesh> on to the queue status.
[07:10] <jamesh> I suck and have two branches past the due date
[07:10] <jamesh> there are 8 total past due and 6 still fresh
[07:10] <thumper> jamesh: I thought the state age took weekends into account
[07:10] <spiv> thumper has one past the date, but that's now blocked on me doing a meta-review, which I'll make sure happens right after this meeting.
[07:10] <jamesh> thumper: it does.
[07:10] <thumper> how come then state age on Friday was 1
[07:10] <thumper> and Monday it's 4?
[07:11] <jamesh> oh.  The red marking takes the weekend into account
[07:11] <jamesh> the number doesn't
[07:11] <thumper> ah
[07:12] <jamesh> the oldest branch is 32 days old, but can't be handled by anyone but SteveA or kiko
[07:13] <thumper> jamesh: is it UTC based for incrementing the state age?
[07:13] <jamesh> thumper: the ages are all time deltas
[07:13] <thumper> ok
[07:13] <spiv> jamesh: the 32-day old branch isn't really a code review, is it?
[07:13] <jamesh> thumper: the weekend calculation for the red uses UTC weekends though
[07:14] <jamesh> spiv: not really.  It needs review/approval though
[07:14] <spiv> Perhaps from the point of view of the pending reviews page it should be "work-in-progress"?  Although I guess we don't have a better forum for tracking that sort of approval.
[07:14] <spiv> Maybe the bug tracker instead.
[07:15] <jamesh> spiv: it isn't work in progress though: it is more like a spec that has been complete but needs to be signed off on
[07:16] <jamesh> anyway, I don't think it is something we can address right now.
[07:16] <spiv> That's sort of my point; that it's queued in the wrong place (even though we don't really have a right place...)
[07:17] <spiv> Anyway, sorry for sidetracking the meeting.
[07:17] <jamesh> I don't think we've got a better place to queue it though.
[07:18] <spiv> nods, rather.
[07:19] <jamesh> I don't have anything to say about the last two items on the agenda
[07:19] <thumper> i do
[07:19] <jamesh> so, is there any other business?
[07:19] <jamesh> thumper: go on
[07:19] <thumper> How long are we going to do the reviewer reviews for new reviewers?
[07:20] <jamesh> I don't know.  We should check with lifeless
[07:20] <spiv> That's a good question
[07:20] <jamesh> thumper: are you finding the meta-reviews useful?
[07:20] <thumper> yeah, in general
[07:20] <thumper> I still have questions of other reviewers
[07:20] <thumper> and it seems helpful
[07:20] <spiv> I guess roughly speaking when we're confident that the new reviewers will do a good job without assistance.
[07:21] <jamesh> I think you've been doing a good job
[07:21] <spiv> Which I'd guess means "pretty soon" :)
[07:21] <jamesh> and you can always ask questions about a review, even if no one is officially doing a meta-review
[07:22] <jamesh> I guess lifeless will be back for next week's meeting, right?
[07:22] <jamesh> we can bring it up then.
[07:22] <thumper> ok
[07:22] <jamesh> any other business?
[07:23] <spiv> Not from me.
[07:23] <thumper> nope
[07:23] <jamesh> okay then.  meeting ends
[07:23] <jamesh> thanks everyone.
[08:16] <pr3d4t0r> :: yawn ::
[08:16] <pr3d4t0r> Hello.
[10:30] <ubotu> New bug: #115930 in launchpad "XMLRPC request body should be logged in OOPS reports" [Medium,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/115930
[10:40] <chengsta> hi
[10:41] <chengsta> i have a question for one of the launchpad administrators: is there a way to delete my launchpad account?
[10:42] <Fujitsu> chengsta: You should file a support request against the launchpad project in the answer tracker.
[11:16] <SteveA> morning!
[11:50] <seb128> hi
[11:50] <seb128> I've opened an upstream task on bug #110655
[11:50] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 110655 in gnome-themes "right click menu close and activate item when open in a corner" [Low,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/110655 - Assigned to Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs)
[11:50] <seb128> and the task is on rebuntu
[11:50] <seb128> how do I change it to gnome-themes?
[11:50] <seb128> and why did it do that?
[11:55] <carlos> seb128: only admins and I guess owners of rebuntu are able to change it
[11:55] <carlos> BjornT: ^^^
[11:55] <seb128> carlos: and were can I change the upstream association for gnome-themes package?
[11:55] <carlos> seb128: about why it was filed against rebuntu... it's either a bug or an error typing the name...
[11:55] <seb128> so next task is opened on gnome-themes correctly ;)
[11:55] <seb128> there is no name
[11:56] <seb128> opening an upstream task only asks for the upstream URL
[11:56] <carlos> upstream URL?
[11:56] <carlos> how do you do that?
[11:56] <carlos> seb128: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-themes/+bug/110655/+choose-affected-product
[11:56] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 110655 in gnome-themes "right click menu close and activate item when open in a corner" [Low,Confirmed]   - Assigned to Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs)
[11:56] <carlos> there it asks you for a project name
[11:56] <carlos> in this case, it should be gnome-themes
[11:56] <seb128> carlos: thanks
[11:57] <carlos> isn't that the form you filled ?
[11:57] <seb128> no
[11:57] <carlos> under the task list, you have a: Also affects: +Upstream... +Distribution....
[11:57] <seb128> right
[11:57] <carlos> and that gives you the url I gave you
[11:57] <seb128> carlos: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-themes/+bug/94791
[11:58] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 94791 in gnome-themes "custom colors for active and inactive are too similar" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  
[11:58] <seb128> click on Upstream
[11:58] <seb128> it does 
[11:58] <seb128> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-themes/+bug/94791/+add-affected-product?field.product=rebuntu
[11:58] <seb128> 
[11:58] <seb128> you don't get the product now because there is a rebuntu task already
[11:58] <carlos> oh
[11:58] <carlos> I see
[11:58] <seb128> there is a wrong gnome-themes upstream product = rebuntu somewhere
[11:58] <seb128> but I don't know where I can change it
[11:59] <carlos> seb128: but you can choose another project!
[11:59] <seb128> no
[11:59] <seb128> well, right
[11:59] <seb128> you have a link
[11:59] <carlos> seb128: ;-)
[11:59] <carlos> but yeah, it's confusing
[11:59] <seb128> but that's only for the task you open no?
[11:59] <seb128> I want to change the default association
[11:59] <seb128> hum
[12:00] <seb128> yes, it's only for the task
[12:00] <carlos> seb128: https://launchpad.net/rebuntu/ferro/+ubuntupkg
[12:00] <carlos> there are a lot of packages linked to rebuntu
[12:01] <carlos> it sounds like an Ubuntu derivative
[12:01] <carlos> that is trying to use launchpad in a different way it was desinged
[12:01] <seb128> ah
[12:01] <seb128> who should I ping to look at the situation? ;)
[12:01] <carlos> don't worry, I'm going to mail our devel mailing list
[12:02] <carlos> to see what could we do here
[12:02] <seb128> thank you
[12:02] <carlos> np
[12:05] <BjornT> seb128: hmm. one major bug is that it's not possible to delete/change an upstream->package relationship.
[12:33] <kiko-zzz> BjornT, that's a major bug, you're right. 
[12:36] <seb128> hey kiko-zzz
[12:36] <kiko-zzz> hey seb128 
[12:36] <kiko-zzz> I am collecting these warts
[01:56] <cprov> good morning, folks !
[02:31] <ubotu> New bug: #115960 in soyuz "Package search results don't make clear which things have bugs/questions" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/115960
[02:41] <exarkun> https://code.launchpad.net/~game-hackers/game/trunk says "You can upload to this branch at: sftp://radix@bazaar.launchpad.net/~game-hackers/game/trunk" but I bet I actually can't
[02:42] <exarkun> also is codebrowse.launchpad.net down or undergoing maintenance or something?  I've been waiting for a page to load from it for a couple minutes now
[02:47] <salgado> exarkun, the first looks like a bug --it should use your launchpad user name rather than Chris'
[02:50] <salgado> exarkun, and we've been experiencing some problems with codebrowse lately. I'll see if I can find someone to bounce it
[02:51] <exarkun> cool, thanks
[02:55] <ubotu> New bug: #115965 in launchpad-bazaar ""Register branch" should work with remote CVS/SVN" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/115965
[02:59] <wolly> Ciao a tutty (Say hello to everyone :-) )
[02:59] <wolly> Some days ago I have uplodaed a .po files for the translation of wordpress in italian
[03:00] <wolly> But it is non yet approved
[03:00] <wolly> I'd like to know if I made some mstakes or if launchpad is closed to new translatino project
[03:09] <pr3d4t0r> :: yawn ::
[03:09] <pr3d4t0r> Good morning :)
[03:13] <salgado> exarkun, codebrowse.lp.net has been bounced
[03:14] <exarkun> pages loading now, thanks a lot :)
[03:19] <mpt> keir, did you post your list of Blender Blockers(TM) anywhere? If not, the launchpad-users@ mailing list might be a good place
[03:25] <ubotu> New bug: #115973 in launchpad ""Complete your registration" page has inappropriate tabs" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/115973
[03:27] <salgado> mpt, ping
[03:27] <mpt> (salgado: In case I'm not here right now, tell me about what you want, and I'll reply when I'm available.)
[03:30] <lifeless> its ALIVE
[03:31] <Hobbsee> oh no!!  lifeless is alive!
[03:31] <lifeless> yup
[03:31] <lifeless> my machine has no power, so Im scamming one here in brazil :)
[03:33] <Hobbsee> lifeless: heh, fair enough.  not playing mao instead?
[03:34] <lifeless> we may dothat after work :). It will depend I think; having got in at 2am last night Im a little fcked right now.
[03:35] <Hobbsee> haha
[03:41] <mwhudson> exarkun: guess who gets to work on codebrowse now
[03:42] <exarkun> mwhudson: are you the lucky winner
[03:42] <mwhudson> i am
[03:42] <exarkun> mwhudson: hooray
[03:42] <exarkun> mwhudson: plz add line number anchors kthx
[03:43] <mwhudson> exarkun: that's done in upstream already actually
[03:44] <mwhudson> like, yesterday
[03:44] <exarkun> oh, excellent :)
[03:46] <mwhudson> exarkun: i filed the bug asking for it about two months ago...
[03:47] <exarkun> two months for a feature request on a decently sized project is not bad.
[03:47] <exarkun> I mean, it wouldn't be
[03:47] <exarkun> for a company that didn't have a kazillion employees
[03:47] <exarkun> but shouldn't you guys be turning things around in like 7 seconds?
[03:48] <mwhudson> it's not a canonical product
[03:49] <mwhudson> http://www.lag.net/loggerhead/
[03:49] <exarkun> huh
[04:12] <LarstiQ> exarkun, mwhudson: robey certainly is overloaded
[04:13] <mwhudson> yeah, and that's why i'm going to spend some time on loggerhead/codebrowse
[04:16] <mwh> loggerhead is now eating my virtual machine
[04:23] <mwh> !!!
[04:23] <mwh> the loadavg is 13.5 now
[04:25] <LarstiQ> what operation is it attempting?
[04:25] <mwh> looking at the file listing for launchpad
[04:33] <keir> mpt: i didn't finish it yet, i'll take another go at it later tonight.
[06:20] <jorgp> can someone please tell me how I can remove my name from a bug that I am listed as also notified, I can not find it anywhere
[06:21] <kiko> jorgp, you are a contact for one of the projects or packages listed. look at the X-Launchpad-Message-Rationale header in your email.
[06:21] <kiko> jorgp, it will tell you exactly why you are getting emailed.
[06:32] <jorgp> kiko: thanks, it says that I am a bug contact for xsane
[06:33] <kiko> jorgp, if you registered the project, that can happen. you can hand it off by just changing the maintainer in the project page.
[06:33] <kiko> jorgp, if you want to, you can reassign to the person "registry".
[06:33] <kiko> that's the catch-all registrant.
[06:34] <jorgp> ok, I am looking where I need to go to do that
[06:36] <kiko> launchpad.net/xsane
[06:39] <jorgp> its a little confusing if you dont use launchpad alot
[06:41] <jorgp> heh, I still dont see it
[06:42] <kiko> jorgp, hmmm
[06:42] <matsubara> jorgp: the Change maintainer link in the Actions menu
[06:43] <kiko> matsubara, it's already the Registry admins, though
[06:43] <kiko> jorgp, ah, it says "xsane (Ubuntu)" in the header, right?
[06:43] <kiko> jorgp, see:
[06:43] <kiko> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xsane
[06:43] <kiko> click on the Bug contacts portlet.
[06:44] <carlos> cheers
[06:45] <jorgp> ah, thanks found it
[06:46] <kiko> jorgp, good man.
[06:47] <seb128> grrrrr
[06:47] <seb128> bug #115199
[06:47] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 115199 in gnome-system-tools "list of services in services-admin is not extensible" [Wishlist,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/115199 - Assigned to Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs)
[06:47] <seb128> the upstream product default to rebuntu
[06:48] <jorgp> kiko: thanks for your help, it had been to that page alot, just the wording got me, bugmail
[06:48] <seb128> is there a way to fix packages which have b0rked this way?
[07:40] <kiko> jorgp, you're welcome. note also that you can just filter that bugmail based on the header (instead of unsubscribing as a bug contact)
[07:42] <radix> I wonder if there's already a bug for "abandoned branches should not appear in recent branches"
[07:43] <kiko> I would suppose so
[07:43] <kiko> mwhudson, you ignorer.
[07:43] <kiko> :)
[07:44] <mwhudson> hm?
[07:44] <mwhudson> oh i'm probably not authed again
[07:45] <kiko> indeed
[07:46] <kiko> indeed
[07:54] <lifeless> salgado: hi. the change to the pdebs keyring location is wierd to me
[07:54] <lifeless> salgado: keeping it role based would be better I think, so that if/when you hand over the responsibility to someone else noone has to update their config
[07:55] <ubotu> New bug: #116033 in launchpad "abandoned branches should not appear in "Latest Code"" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/116033
[07:56] <salgado> lifeless, I don't see what you mean... which config would they have to change?
[07:57] <lifeless> well, the wiki page that says ~salgado will have to be changed, for instance.
[07:58] <lifeless> I dont know hwat other changes you areplanning, but you can see my point I hope.
[07:59] <salgado> lifeless, ah, right. that was just a temporary change to have the pubkey served through https rather than plain http. I'll move it somewhere generic once everything is settled
[08:01] <jorgp> thank you kiko
[08:06] <lifeless> salgado: ah. I thought that key was already on th ekey servers.
[08:16] <pochu> matsubara: around? See python-numpy on https://launchpad.net/~kitterman/+packages. The 1:1.0.2-3ubuntu1 link is broken, since it's been uploaded recently.
[08:16] <pochu> (4 minutes ago, atm)
[08:18] <matsubara> pochu: thanks for the pointer.
[08:19] <pochu> No problem.
[08:21] <matsubara> cprov: could you check why we have those broken links in the +packages page and add the info to bug 115078?
[08:21] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 115078 in soyuz "Broken link in /people/me/+packages" [Undecided,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/115078
[08:21] <matsubara> cprov: it seems to happen only on recently uploaded packages.
[08:22] <pochu> matsubara: for normal uploads, it seems to happen for more than half an hour. However, for uploads to -proposed, it may be broken for some days. And as Fujitsu said in his comment, if the upload is rejected, then it'll be a broken link.
[08:32] <cprov> matsubara: we should wait the package to be published before rendering the link (or even presenting the package).
[09:46] <ubotu> New bug: #116048 in launchpad "Remove test_ftparchive.py hack when pqm/lpnet moves to feisty" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/116048
[10:39] <Ebuntor> hi I've got a question, not sure if this is the right channel to ask: if I have an active openPGP key on my launchpad account it will show as a link on my account page. even unregistered people can see it. I'm a little worried about showing my name and email publicly because of spam. so I was wondering if there is any way I can remove this link form my account without having to deactivate my key?
[10:40] <kiko> Ebuntor, that sounds like a bug. we disclose gpg keys to users that are not logged in? salgado, matsubara?
[10:40] <Kmos> Ebuntor: only registered people can see your mail
[10:40] <Kmos> gpg key really don't know
[10:40] <Ebuntor> no not my mail, that's hidden. I'm talking about the link to my pgp key
[10:41] <Ebuntor> here's a link http://keyserver.ubuntu.com:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x6B01986F&op=index
[10:41] <Ebuntor> you can find a link to it on my account https://launchpad.net/~ebuntor
[10:41] <Ebuntor> so I'd like to remove that link
[10:41] <kiko> Ebuntor, I understand now.
[10:41] <kiko> Ebuntor, well...
[10:42] <kiko> why would removing the link actually help much?
[10:42] <kiko> Ebuntor, you do realize that there are other indexes of that information, web and google-accessible?
[10:42] <elmo> the keyserver is spidered
[10:43] <elmo> both ours and many others in the global keyserver network
[10:43] <Ebuntor> yeah I know but still theoratically a bot could come across it. I mean why add a option to hide your email if it's still visible via your pgp key 
[10:45] <kiko> Ebuntor, because some people have different email addresses between keys and launchpad accounts, for instance.
[10:45] <kiko> Ebuntor, and it's not "theoretically" -- bots /do/ spider the PGP web UI.
[10:46] <Ebuntor> I see
[10:46] <elmo> http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF8&q=4096R%2FAB2A91F5
[10:46] <elmo> ^-- f.e.
[10:47] <Ebuntor> heh I get your point elmo, the only way would be to not have any key at all ;)
[10:48] <kiko> Ebuntor, yes. or to use a different email address on your key (one which was more seriously spamfiltered and anoymized for instance).
[10:48] <kiko> or just don't care too much about that level of privacy, since it's probably true that you don't have it anyway. :)
[10:50] <Ebuntor> well in this case I'm not so worried about my privacy more about getting 500 email every day about viagra ;)
[10:52] <Ebuntor> well thanks for all the info and help guys :)
[10:52] <kiko> Ebuntor, spam filtering is the solution, unfortunately. trying to hide from spammers doesn't help :-(
[10:52] <kiko> you're welcome!
[10:57] <Ebuntor> kiko: just one more question, how could remove my key from the server? by revoking and uploading it again? 
[10:57] <kiko> Ebuntor, that much I don't know. I'm not sure how keyservers work. but maybe you want to google about keyservers and revocation?
[10:58] <Ebuntor> I'll do that, ty
[11:30] <ubotu> New bug: #116070 in rosetta "Translation files not being imported" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/116070
[11:43] <thumper> morning
[12:15] <ubotu> New bug: #116081 in launchpad "branch subscriptions" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/116081