[07:04] <DanaG> Odd, after I log into GDM, the background goes blue for a while until my desktop starts.
[07:04] <DanaG> How do I change that (to brown-orange or to black)?
[07:05] <DanaG> Oh, and I found a new bug I think I'll file a report on (if there isn't one already)
[07:06] <DanaG> Brightness control with gnome-power-manager (and thus HAL) is broken -- between the discrete steps of 12.5 (will be 12 or 13) units, the backlight is entirely OFF.
[07:07] <DanaG> So when Gnome fades the brigntness, it goes bright<off>medium<off>dim -- and the default would go to off again after that.
[10:33] <_4strO> yop yop
[01:49] <cypherdelic> im with gutsy repo on feisty kernel :)
[01:50] <cypherdelic> stuff runs well
[01:51] <scotty2hott2k> has any plans actually been made for new features for gutsy?
[01:53] <cypherdelic> but new ia32libs fckd-up dependencies of acroread,vmwareplayer because of ia32libs-gtk/sdl which i had to uninstall before installation of ia32libs. thats because some libraried from gtk/sdl were transferred to ia32libs. ill keep on waiting.
[01:56] <gnomefreak> acroread isnt in feisty or gutsy
[01:57] <cypherdelic> i know but as vmwplayer (which IS in feisty AND'll be in gutsy, it depends on ia32libs-gtk/sdl
[01:58] <gnomefreak> is your system feisty or gutsy?
[01:58] <cypherdelic> its basically feisty/feisty kernel
[01:58] <gnomefreak> with gutsy repos?
[01:59] <cypherdelic> but i changed all official mirrors in sources.list from feisty to gutsy
[01:59] <gnomefreak> did you dist-upgrade after that?
[01:59] <cypherdelic> and the 3rd party ones, that i know of them having gutsy repo
[01:59] <cypherdelic> gnomefreak: of course
[01:59] <gnomefreak> cypherdelic: than why are you saying your on feisty?
[02:00] <cypherdelic> becaue im still with 2.6.20-15-lowlatency-feisty
[02:00] <cypherdelic> amd64
[02:00] <gnomefreak> thats gutsys kernel
[02:00] <gnomefreak> for the time being
[02:00] <cypherdelic> no gutsys is 2.6.22
[02:00] <gnomefreak> no its not
[02:01] <gnomefreak> cypherdelic: gutsys kernel hasnt been release for upgrade
[02:01] <cypherdelic> oh i may be wrong
[02:01] <gnomefreak> hint why you are still on 2.6.20
[02:01] <gnomefreak> when the meta package is finished it will be pushed.
[02:01] <cypherdelic> ok thanks
[02:02] <gnomefreak> ok well dependencies for arcoread are gonna be messed up
[02:02] <gnomefreak> since ther eis no ubuntu package for it
[02:02] <cypherdelic> dont care acroread
[02:02] <cypherdelic> vmwareplayer
[02:03] <cypherdelic> depends on ia32libs-gtk/sdl but not installable because of ia32libs that contents files from both gtk and sdl
[02:03] <gnomefreak> ia32libs may be having issues as it was on feisty as well
[02:04] <gnomefreak> i dont have a gutsy 64bit around. maybe wait for alpha to be released?
[02:04] <gnomefreak> i dont remember seeing them getting merged either
[02:04] <cypherdelic> gnomefreak for vmware-player its only ia32libs-gtk
[02:05] <gnomefreak> cypherdelic: if vmware-player wasnt merged it wont have correct depends in it
[02:06] <gnomefreak> cypherdelic: file a bug someone will fix the control file and rebuild it or merge it fix control and build it
[02:07] <cypherdelic> so may it help to block actual version of ia32-libs, that i may be able to install ia32-libs-gtk?
[02:08] <gnomefreak> cypherdelic: they will make it depend on the right version
[02:08] <cypherdelic> i have no idea about that "file a bug"
[02:09] <cypherdelic> im autist :)
[02:09] <gnomefreak> !bugs
[02:09] <ubotu> If you find a bug in Ubuntu or any of its derivatives, please file a bug report at: http://bugs.ubuntu.com/  -  Bugs in/wishes for the bots can be filed at http://launchpad.net/products/ubuntu-bots
[02:10] <cypherdelic> gnomefreak: they want to have my email-address
[02:11] <cypherdelic> gnomefreak: cant i file a bug anonymously?
[02:11] <gnomefreak> cypherdelic: alot of things are going to break in gutsy to garrentee a fix it has to be filed as a bug.
[02:11] <gnomefreak> cypherdelic: no
[02:11] <cypherdelic> gnomefreak: thats very bad
[02:12] <gnomefreak> no its not it stops spam and other crap from posting on Launchpad
[02:13] <cypherdelic> gnomefreak: as im working for a company that OWN everything i develop, so i wont do a "DON'T" and tell a bug report my email address
[02:13] <cypherdelic> OWNS
[02:14] <gnomefreak> cypherdelic: than your bug is likely to not get fixed unless someone else files it
[02:14] <Toma-> Give me some details and your email and ill file it?
[02:15] <cypherdelic> my company could impeach me for that
[02:15] <Toma-> are you serious?
[02:15] <cypherdelic> YES
[02:15] <Toma-> get a new job dude
[02:15] <cypherdelic> its an apprenticeship
[02:15] <Toma-> even more reason to leave :)
[02:15] <cypherdelic> thats the way they promised me future
[02:16] <cypherdelic> i need this apprenticeship to EVER get work
[02:16] <Toma-> well dont file bugs
[02:16] <gnomefreak> than i would say dont use development versions.
[02:17] <gnomefreak> when testing devel versions bugs are needed to be files
[02:17] <gnomefreak> filed
[02:17] <cypherdelic> oh well im allowed to personally use it
[02:18] <cypherdelic> but im not allowed to code under GPL because everything i code or develelop in any way to my business (it-systemelectricia) belongs to my company
[02:18] <cypherdelic> dot. Over
[02:18] <gnomefreak> yes you can im not stopping you what i am saying is if bug is not filed chances of it getting fixed is low
[02:20] <cypherdelic> maybe someone different cares about vmwareplayer
[02:21] <cypherdelic> i dont care about it ether, the only vm i got, was a xp-pro-sp2 for viewing education-videos of one of my teachers lol
[02:22] <gnomefreak> vythe maintainer cares about it. but he wont know something is wrong with it unless you file a bug on it. or build it yourself and fix control file. your comapny can not tell you what you can and can not license at home.
[02:22] <gnomefreak> s/vythe/the
[02:23] <cypherdelic> its not relevant if its beeing developed in home or office
[02:23] <cypherdelic> its part of them
[02:24] <gnomefreak> anyway since you wont file a bug than i suggest you wait until its fixed if it gets fixed. remember gutsy hasnt been release for public use yet.
[03:00] <l3on> hi all
[03:00] <l3on> :)
[03:09] <Hobbsee> heya
[06:29] <DShepherd> are the specs for gibbon available? if they are where can i find themm
[06:39] <Hobbsee> DShepherd: blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu
[08:17] -ChanServ(ChanServ@services.)- You do not have channel operator access to [#ubuntu-boot] 
[08:17] -ChanServ(ChanServ@services.)- [#ubuntu-server]  Ubuntu Server Discussions (development and support)
[08:17] -ChanServ(ChanServ@services.)- [#ubuntu-ops]  Welcome to #ubuntu-ops - Home of the operators for official K/X/Ed/Ubuntu channels. Questions, requests and complaints about Ubuntu related channels and their people can be filed here"
[08:17] -ChanServ(ChanServ@services.)- [#ubuntu+1]  Please read the topic. Especially if things are broken!
[10:06] <sivik> how do i install a .cpkg file
[10:10] <PriceChild> Hmmm I can't verify the signings on the new compiz packages...
[10:11] <PriceChild> Anyone else around?
[10:12] <borschty_> did you try reloading?
[10:13] <PriceChild> Hmm apt thinks they're fine
[10:13] <PriceChild> but the update manager complained
[10:13] <PriceChild> how odd...
[10:13] <PriceChild> ah well :)
[10:13] <borschty_> i used synaptic and it did not complain iirc
[10:16] <sivik> !cpkg
[10:16] <ubotu> Sorry, I don't know anything about cpkg - try searching on http://bots.ubuntulinux.nl/factoids.cgi