[12:27] <gnomefreak> Admiral_Chicago: have you mentored anyone from bug 110049 yet?
[12:27] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 110049 in firefox "Firefox needs a better clue file" [Undecided,In progress]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/110049
[12:27] <Admiral_Chicago> gnomefreak: look up about 15 lines
[12:27] <gnomefreak> person mainly asking about would be jen
[12:28] <Admiral_Chicago> i've emailed the group already though
[12:28] <gnomefreak> i would miss that :(
[12:28] <Admiral_Chicago> i actually did that yesterday
[12:30] <Admiral_Chicago> gnomefreak: so I'll wait on their response, it looks like we have a good base, I'm looking to add 10 cases
[12:30] <Admiral_Chicago> should have something real good commited by end of next week
[12:30] <gnomefreak> what do you think as far as jen for member? or should we have him/her go through the meeting?
[12:31] <gnomefreak> me will grab the branch and take a look at it and pass on news to asac and hjmf if they dont already know. they are the 2 that are big on bughelper its still fairly new to me
[12:32] <Admiral_Chicago> he looks like a very good candidate,
[12:32] <Admiral_Chicago> before the next meeting, I'll email the concil and tell them my idea
[12:33] <gnomefreak> k
[12:34] <Admiral_Chicago> when is the next meeting...
[12:34] <Admiral_Chicago> i don't see anything on the fride
[12:36] <gnomefreak> im waiting on replys from everyone from the ML
[12:37] <gnomefreak> i was thinking 5th of june at 1800UTC
[12:39] <gnomefreak> if you alex and asac and one other person agree it will be set in stone
[12:39] <gnomefreak> i will be pretty much tied up with drs and OO.o until the weekend but i should be here 80% of time
[12:41] <Admiral_Chicago> i'll be okay with that time
[12:47] <gnomefreak> k ill bbs
[02:02] <gnomefreak> wth is Unpacking oob680-m5-core.tar.bz2...
[02:02] <gnomefreak> Fixing unfortunate snafus
[07:50] <Admiral_Chicago> asac: ping.
[07:50] <Admiral_Chicago> asac: i'm looking at fx's clue file i'm thinking the @ char in a problem no? do we need it?
[07:52] <Admiral_Chicago> i'll be at my desk but watching tv so i'll be in and out regularly
[09:54] <gnomefreak> OO.o fails to build. :(
[09:56] <gnomefreak> ill be back need to reboot
[10:55] <asac> ole
[10:57] <asac> gnomefreak: it failed? you have a log?
[11:38] <gnomefreak> yea i think so giv eme a minute to check.
[11:40] <gnomefreak> it seems to fail in differetn spot than first time. i didnt have log for the first spin but do for second. what part of log would be helpful? here is a few lines from end till stopped
[11:41] <gnomefreak> make[1] : *** [all-recursive]  Error 1
[11:41] <gnomefreak> make[1] : Leaving directory `/home/gnomefreak/dapper_builds/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-2.0.2/ooo-build'
[11:41] <gnomefreak> make: *** [debian/stampdir/build]  Error 2
[11:44] <gnomefreak> gonna try cleaning and rerunning it it failed way too early this time
[12:05] <asac> gnomefreak ... that part says nothing
[12:05] <asac> i need more context
[12:05] <asac> at least 20-30 lines
[12:11] <gnomefreak> i will give you everything in a minute
[12:12] <asac> k
[12:12] <gnomefreak> http://gnomefreak.pastebin.ca/507037  <<< full build
[12:12] <gnomefreak> till errror
[12:14] <gnomefreak> im wondering if its build-dep of something that i already spun that is meeing it up so i am going through those
[12:15] <asac> i don't see where it fails
[12:18] <gnomefreak> sad part is that is full log
[12:18] <gnomefreak> maybe ping doko about it?
[12:19] <asac> i do
[12:19] <gnomefreak> you do?
[12:22] <asac> pinged doko .. maybe your hard disk is full?
[12:25] <gnomefreak> it better not be
[12:25] <gnomefreak> thought command was dh :(
[12:26] <asac> df -k
[12:27] <gnomefreak> 83%
[12:27] <gnomefreak> used
[12:27] <asac> maybe it was full when you extracted ooo?
[12:27] <asac> can you redownload?
[12:28] <gnomefreak> maybe ill see what i can do to get rid of some stuff
[12:28] <asac> and ensure that there is enough space
[12:28] <gnomefreak> redownload OO.o sure i also have a dapper chroot on my feisty system i can use to build it )
[12:28] <gnomefreak> :)
[12:29] <gnomefreak> just might do that
[12:30] <gnomefreak> ill do that brb
[12:34] <asac> so you are now on feisty?
[12:34] <asac> fine
[12:34] <gnomefreak> yep
[12:34] <gnomefreak> in dappper chroot
[12:34] <gnomefreak> this is a 40gig drive the otehr was a 20 gig
[12:36] <asac> k ... guess you need 20
[12:36] <asac> free
[12:37] <gnomefreak> i have 65+% free
[12:37] <gnomefreak> im just gettng rid of a few non needed things atm
[12:37] <gnomefreak> source takes a while to download
[12:38] <gnomefreak> might take kde off my gutsy system
[12:38] <gnomefreak> thats a few gigs there
[12:40] <gnomefreak> i should have it started before i leave for appt.
[01:04] <gnomefreak> i had a few thoughts so im gonna see if they clean up enough (and should clean up alot of space
[01:04] <asac> k
[01:13] <gnomefreak>  53%
[01:13] <gnomefreak> geting down there :)
[01:15] <asac> gnomefreak: done?
[01:16] <gnomefreak> not yet dpkg is taking sweet time
[01:18] <gnomefreak> not sure how much space i will need for OO.o so im getting rid of everything i dont need like libqt3-mt :)
[01:19] <gnomefreak> i also dropped 2 of my chroots on gutsy sys
[01:23] <asac> good
[01:33] <gnomefreak> that was odd. gnome-panels left and came back :(
[01:37] <gnomefreak> ok down to 41% of 20 gigs being used thats 10+ gigs free should i try now or wait fot spkg to finish removing kde libs/packages?
[01:37] <gnomefreak> dpkg*
[01:38] <gnomefreak> im gonna try it i ran clean just incase lets see how it goes
[01:43] <gnomefreak> its going lets see how far it gets if 60% of 20 gigs isnt enough that i have no choice but to use feisty sys
[01:44] <asac> gnomefreak: ok
[01:44] <asac> please observe while openoffice extracts its sources
[01:44] <asac> (it does at the begin at the build afaik)
[01:45] <asac> e.g. observe how your disk space performs :)
[01:45] <gnomefreak> its failed again
[01:45] <gnomefreak> sysfs                 18508428   6865640  10702588  40% /sys
[01:47] <gnomefreak> http://gnomefreak.pastebin.ca/507096
[01:47] <gnomefreak> looks very simular to last one
[01:49] <gnomefreak> maybe it fills up my memory and stops? althought that seems weird since none of the other packages did that
[01:52] <gnomefreak> apt-get build-dep isnt outputting anything so i should have all needed libs....
[01:55] <gnomefreak> was hoping fakeroot ./debian/rules binary would give me something to go on but still no. Can you test build it on your system (not sure if 64bit would have same affect as on 32
[02:10] <gnomefreak> asac: stupid question but are you backporting tbird 2.0 to feisty atm?
[02:10] <asac> no
[02:10] <asac> not needed atm
[02:10] <gnomefreak> they are
[02:10] <asac> tbird support will go on till autumn
[02:10] <gnomefreak> someone is
[02:10] <gnomefreak> bug 107691
[02:10] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 107691 in thunderbird "thunderbird 2.0 is out of the oven" [Wishlist,Fix released]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/107691
[02:42] <gnomefreak> asac: i guess we are gonna need someone to spin it. ill ask in -motu if anyone feels like it
[02:42] <gnomefreak> once i get paperwork finished
[02:43] <asac> whats the problem?
[02:44] <asac> disk space?
[02:44] <gnomefreak> no
[02:44] <gnomefreak> im not sure why its not building. i cant find anything wrong with system
[02:45] <gnomefreak> 60% or 20 gigs should be plenty of space to build it. thats what around 13gigs
[02:45] <gnomefreak> maybe 12
[02:48] <asac> i can try
[02:52] <gnomefreak> let me know if it fails for you. but if you have more pressing things that need to get done i wouldnt put this infront of it
[02:54] <asac> yeah i won't
[05:18] <hjmf> asac ping!
[05:19] <asac> hi!
[05:19] <hjmf> hi
[05:19] <hjmf> question about bug 116421
[05:19] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 116421 in firefox "firefox shell breaks "profile" option" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/116421
[05:19] <hjmf> do you know if really exists a -profile flag for firefox?
[05:19] <hjmf> after reading the man page I haven't found any
[05:20] <hjmf> and /usr/bin/firefox bash script handles well the options in the man page
[05:20] <asac> fama est
[05:20] <asac> people always get this wrong
[05:20] <asac> afaik that option existed at some point in the past
[05:20] <asac> now you have -P profilename
[05:20] <hjmf> yep noticed
[05:20] <asac> but you never could pass a full path name
[05:21] <asac> at least i cannot remember
[05:21] <hjmf> I just wanted to confirm before rejecting the bug
[05:21] <hjmf> with -P you just pass the profile name
[05:21] <hjmf> not any path file
[05:21] <asac> wait a sec
[05:22] <asac> http://www.mozilla.org/docs/command-line-args.html
[05:22] <asac> thats the official set afaik
[05:22] <hjmf> OK will read and then reject it if procceed
[05:22] <hjmf> thank you
[05:23] <asac> cool
[05:23] <asac> hjmf: do you plan to do motu things at some point?
[05:24] <hjmf> hmm, I'm very busy nowadays and from what I'm seeing from you and gnomefreak that looks quite hard
[05:24] <asac> k
[05:24] <asac> hjmf: actually its not what we do here :)
[05:24] <hjmf> however it can be very interesting for me
[05:24] <asac> its like merging packages
[05:24] <asac> which is a simple thing
[05:24] <hjmf> ah ok
[05:25] <hjmf> then I have no idea yet :)
[05:25] <asac> or packaging new small things
[05:25] <hjmf> do you want me to do something?
[05:25] <hjmf> I might want to learn
[05:25] <asac> no ... just if you want to do something i am happy to help or guide you :)
[05:26] <hjmf> :)
[05:26] <asac> http://merges.ubuntu.com/universe.html
[05:26] <hjmf> ah ok, will read and learn what is that stuff about
[05:26] <asac> yeah ... just if time permits.
[05:26] <asac> :)
[05:26] <hjmf> if I'll need help I know who ask to
[05:26] <hjmf> :)
[05:27] <asac> sure ... i am here ;)
[05:27] <hjmf> thank you asac
[05:27] <asac> yw
[05:49] <hjmf> hmm, after looking some docs about motu merging looks that it is a good thing to start to play with
[05:50] <hjmf> looks quite interesthing though I still need to figure out many things about it e.g. when, where, do I have to be a MOTU...
[05:50] <hjmf> ?
[05:50] <hjmf> Certainly it *must* be in my TODO list
[05:51] <hjmf> ...but also has to wait a bit ....
[05:51] <hjmf> maybe a couple of weeks :)
[05:51] <hjmf> but it has picked me a bit
[06:17] <asac> cool :)
[06:17] <asac> actually i think you can prepare merges and upload to revu
[06:17] <asac> but i am not sure
[06:17] <asac> maybe ask on -motu
[06:17] <asac> how to get started
[06:17] <asac> if you need someone to sponsor i can do that
[06:17] <asac> revu is good nevertheless, because there are others looking at your work
[06:18] <asac> hjmf: but as said ... ask if revu is good to show your competence in merging etc.
[06:46] <hjmf> asac: sure :)
[06:52] <hjmf> thank you asac, will tell you when (if) I made some progress :)
[06:54] <hjmf> I've read some wiki pages and they seem to be pretty self explanatory on how to start
[06:55] <hjmf> but before start messing I'll request your mentorship :)
[07:28] <gnomefreak> IMHO merges are hard to do
[07:29] <gnomefreak> asac: how did OO.o do or not yet tried?
[07:29] <asac> nope
[07:29] <asac> not yet
[07:29] <asac> hjmf: your welcome
[07:38] <gnomefreak> asac: hjmf while i have you 2 here is june 5th at 1800UTc good for meeting for you?
[07:38] <gnomefreak> @schedule new_york
[07:38] <ubotu> Schedule for America/New_York: 24 May 16:00: Ubuntu Development Team | 25 May 08:00: MOTU | 27 May 10:00: LoCo Team | 29 May 11:00: Kernel Team | 29 May 17:00: Community Council | 30 May 08:00: Edubuntu
[07:44] <asac> asac: yes ... looks like
[07:45] <gnomefreak> ok
[08:35] <hjmf> gnomefreak: to me it is OK
[08:35] <hjmf> bug 116421
[08:35] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 116421 in firefox "firefox shell breaks "profile" option" [Medium,Confirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/116421
[08:36] <hjmf> after OP's complaints and a few tests I've confirmed that bug and tagged as mt-eval
[08:37] <hjmf> not sure if we want to hack the /usr/bin/firefox script.
[08:37] <hjmf> But certainly the  -profile commandline option seems to work
[08:39] <hjmf> asac, gnomefreak  ^^^
[08:50] <gnomefreak> k rather not hack anything if we can avoid it i would think. is this on feisty?
[08:51] <gnomefreak> asac: things like that, that are not security fixes can we sneak in with security fixes? im not sure how to explain that fix in feisty otherwise
[08:51] <hjmf> gnomefreak: yes, I guess it is the result of an undocumented feature
[08:51] <gnomefreak> maybe sneak it in in 2.0.0.4
[08:51] <gnomefreak> if it ever releases
[08:53] <hjmf> gnomefreak: do you know where is the script from? debian, mozilla, ubuntu?
[08:53] <asac> hjmf: interesting
[08:53] <gnomefreak> i would think that is ubuntu side of things
[08:54] <hjmf> it can be handled through the script, but the whole parsing commandline options might be changed which I don't like
[08:54] <gnomefreak> i peaked at this this morning i think
[08:56] <hjmf> it might be needed to parse the command line options in pairs just for this particular situation
[08:57] <gnomefreak> i guess maybe add a patch for the diff. since that way saves you from hacking it, atleast it will look more official. but with that type of patch we need mozilla to ack it right asac ?
[08:58] <hjmf> or the dirty solution is *after* parsing command line options as is now, search for -profile <path> and fix just only that part
[08:58] <hjmf> which will be a one liner fix
[08:59] <hjmf> I mean by fixing that part removing the file:// string
[08:59] <gnomefreak> im looking at the script now
[09:01] <hjmf> it can be fixed as
[09:01] <gnomefreak> hmmmmmm
[09:02] <gnomefreak> can you give me the full line in feisty that has file://
[09:03] <gnomefreak> could just be me but i dont see it nor anything like it in that script in gutsy
[09:03] <hjmf> echo "$@" | sed "/ -profile file:\/\// -profile/"
[09:03] <hjmf> placing that line before the last line of the script
[09:04] <hjmf> which is exec_verbose ${MOZ
[09:04] <hjmf> ...
[09:04] <hjmf> or just
[09:05] <gnomefreak> that line will fix it?
[09:05] <gnomefreak> i want to see the issue line
[09:05] <hjmf> exec_verbose ${MOZ_PROGRAM} "echo "$@" | sed '/ -profile file:\/\//'"
[09:05] <hjmf> not tested, but it has to do the trick
[09:06] <hjmf> gnomefreak: the *offending*  code is from line 243 to 265
[09:07] <hjmf> im through vnc and I cannot copy & paste
[09:07] <gnomefreak> lol
[09:07] <gnomefreak> not in gutsy its not
[09:08] <asac> what is the problem?
[09:08] <asac> i mean in what case is -profile broken?
[09:08] <hjmf> it is broken in feisty
[09:09] <hjmf> as you cannot pass a path because the script takes it as an url and appends the file:// string to it
[09:09] <gnomefreak> give me steps to reproduce and ill tell you if its fixed in gutsy
[09:10] <hjmf> gnomefreak: just run bash -x /usr/bin/firefox -profile some/path and check that the final ops passed to firefox-bin are right
[09:10] <hjmf> w/o the file:///
[09:10] <hjmf> string
[09:10] <hjmf> Have to go for some minutes
[09:10] <hjmf> back in a while
[09:11] <hjmf> the gutsy script looks very different that the one on feisty
[09:11] <hjmf> though still have to look at it
[09:11] <hjmf> back in a while
[09:12] <gnomefreak> looks fine here
[09:16] <gnomefreak> i say if someone can confirm that it works in gutsy as it should other than myself we can close the bug as its fixed in gutsy to do it the right way as this is not a security fix.
[09:19] <gnomefreak> the package in our feisty repo might also fix this issue
[09:19] <gnomefreak> asac: btw 2.0.0.4 looks like it is released
[09:20] <gnomefreak> oh nevermind thats RC'
[09:27] <hjmf> gnomefreak: you are right it is fixed in gutsy
[09:28] <gnomefreak> than i would close it as such
[09:28] <gnomefreak> hjmf: i dont have feisty chroot atm but can you test the firefox from our feisty repo
[09:28] <gnomefreak> the one in gutsy was previewed in that archive
[09:28] <gnomefreak> im working on a feisty chroot atm
[09:29] <gnomefreak> if it is fixed send them to it :)
[09:29] <gnomefreak> myabe find out from asac if he feels ok about backporting it or fixing it in feisty but i doubt it
[09:29] <hjmf> do you have that firefox script to paste it somewhere? if not I'll download the full package
[09:30] <gnomefreak> from our package?
[09:30] <gnomefreak> or from gutsy?
[09:30] <hjmf> yes
[09:30] <hjmf> from our feisty package
[09:30] <gnomefreak> hjmf: if you give me time i will
[09:30] <hjmf> ty
[09:30] <gnomefreak> i am setting up chroot atm. ill ping you with it
[09:30] <gnomefreak> when done
[09:31] <hjmf> k
[09:31] <hjmf> I'll be out for a while, so no hurry
[09:35] <gnomefreak> k sometime in next 2+ hours or tomorrow morning if i didnt give it to you by morning remind me
[09:35] <gnomefreak> im gonna try to throw feisty on shitty laptop tonight too
[09:39] <gnomefreak> holy shit thats alot of money
[09:40] <hjmf> gnomefreak: don't worry I think it is a good opportunity to start testing *our* builds so I'll download that package
[09:40] <hjmf> :P
[09:40] <gnomefreak> $180.00 USD for a battery for my laptop :(
[09:40] <gnomefreak> cheaper to by a laptop
[09:40] <gnomefreak> ebay == 30 USD though
[09:41] <gnomefreak> had an idea lets see if it works
[09:46] <gnomefreak> asac: devel meeting in like 15 minutes
[09:51] <asac> yep
[09:51] <asac> getting something to drink
[10:56] <Admiral_Chicago> JenFraggle: great job i'll review it now
[11:00] <Admiral_Chicago> JenFraggle: it looks good, great jobx
[11:00] <Admiral_Chicago> JenFraggle: now I 'm off to do dishes and house work. good work today
[11:00] <JenFraggle> thanks
[11:00] <JenFraggle> i feel all productive now, just in time for bed
[11:00] <Admiral_Chicago> asac: might want to check out the one clue file that JenFraggle made today with my help.
[11:01] <Admiral_Chicago> just pull the bzr branch
[11:01] <Admiral_Chicago> okay time to run
[11:02] <asac> hey guys ... give an old man some rest :)
[11:02] <asac> i will be back in 15 minutes or so
[11:03] <Admiral_Chicago> haha. i'll be back in ~1 hr
[11:04] <ThunderStruck> laptop running :)
[11:18] <asac> Admiral_Chicago: cool
[11:19] <asac> ThunderStruck: has it more horse power than your desktop?
[11:21] <ThunderStruck> hell no
[11:21] <ThunderStruck> p2 300mhz with ~300 mb ram
[11:24] <gnomefreak> god way too much highlight
[11:24] <gnomefreak> hmmmm
[11:24] <gnomefreak> better
[12:15] <gnomefreak> asac: did you start on sunbird yet?
[12:16] <asac> yes
[12:16] <gnomefreak> i would say build RC and upgrade it to final
[12:16] <asac> still playing around to get it build against something system installed
[12:16] <gnomefreak> ah
[12:16] <asac> e.g. not building whole js engine and gecko on its own
[12:17] <gnomefreak> lightning kind of kills the view of tbird takes up too much of the ui
[12:17] <gnomefreak> 1 little box for messages and 3 big boxes for lightning
[12:17] <gnomefreak> and 1 little box for folders