[08:53] <ubotu> New bug: #24955 in xorg (main) "xserver-xorg: undefined colors render important apps unusable" [High,Rejected]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/24955
[09:35] <ubotu> New bug: #116768 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.20 (restricted) "nvidia-glx should depend on it's kernel version" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/116768
[11:53] <ubotu> New bug: #86142 in xserver-xorg-video-nv (main) "Jerky rendering in Epiphany (herd4)" [Low,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/86142
[11:53] <ubotu> New bug: #116793 in xserver-xorg-video-intel (main) "3d applications with compiz enabled are not usable (Intel 945GM GPU - feisty)" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/116793
[11:55] <ubotu> New bug: #106836 in xorg (main) "blinking screen when on launchpad.net" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/106836
[07:01] <kylem> bryce/timo, working on merge of mesa 6.5.3 from experimenta (thank jcristau)
[07:01] <jcristau> :)
[07:02] <kylem> then i need to bisect and find which patches fix fullscreen gl on i965 for feisty 6.5.2 *cry*
[07:11] <ubotu> New bug: #85844 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.20 (restricted) "fglrx power saving" [Undecided,Rejected]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/85844
[07:30] <kylem> tepsipakki, why'd we remove lesstif-dev from build-deps in mesa?
[08:17] <ubotu> New bug: #116808 in xserver-xorg-video-intel (main) "White boxes instead of shadows on Intel 945 (-intel driver)" [Critical,Unconfirmed]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/116808
[08:18] <bryce> kylem: great
[08:18] <jcristau> kylem: maybe because you didn't build libGLw?
[08:19] <kylem> aha.
[08:19] <kylem> ok. that explains that.
[08:19] <kylem> jcristau, thanks!
[08:19] <jcristau> np
[08:20] <kylem> (i was trying to figure out how a few changelog pieces fit together...)
[09:25] <ubotu> New bug: #43317 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.15 (restricted) "xvidtune doesn't work with latest nvidia-glx" [Medium,Needs info]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/43317
[09:46] <keescook> bryce: appres 1.0.1 sponsored.  :)
[09:47] <bryce> great thanks
[09:47] <bryce> I'm almost done with beforelight, just need to test the deb
[09:47] <keescook> cool.  I'm morbidly curious to know what caused the weird paths...
[09:50] <bryce> yup, I think I figured it out, but would appreciate your doublechecking on it
[09:55] <bryce> ok, you got mail
[09:55] <ubotu> New bug: #24059 in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.15 (restricted) "hyperthreading smp not supported on NVIDA6610XL with kernel 2.6.12-9-686-smp" [Medium,Rejected]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/24059
[10:01] <ubotu> New bug: #25954 in xserver-xorg-input-keyboard (main) "random extra keys are unsupported" [Medium,Rejected]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/25954
[10:26] <ubotu> New bug: #26538 in xserver-xorg-video-sis (main) "Screen corruption and crashes with hardware acceleration" [Medium,Rejected]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/26538
[10:49] <bryce> kylem: do you know if the i810 driver on feisty supports custom modelines?
[11:23] <keescook> bryce: nice work tracking down that path bug.  :)  did your patch fix it?  (I would have expected a patch to Makefile.in too)
[11:24] <keescook> you can examine the debian contents with "dpkg-deb -c PKG.deb"
[11:24] <bryce> it seemed to prevent the creation of the extra subdirs for me, but I wasn't 100% sure
[11:24] <bryce> I didn't know if Makefile.in needed to be patched, or if that would be autogenerated
[11:24] <bryce> ok cool, I was wondering how to do that
[11:26] <ubotu> New bug: #27421 in linux-source-2.6.15 (main) "Logitech RX300 mouse extra-buttons without kernel events" [Medium,Rejected]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/27421
[11:26] <keescook> "automake" (usually run prior to tarball creation) makes Makefile.in from Makefile.am.  "configure" makes Makefile from Makefile.in, so in this case, looking at the debian/rules, it (correctly) doesn't rerun automake, so I think Makefile.in will need patching too.
[11:27] <bryce> ok yeah
[11:28] <bryce> I had initially tested with Makefile.in (and Makefile) corrected.  I tried to back out those changes to be sure
[11:32] <keescook> cool; I figured the dpkg-deb investigation tool was the missing bit.  also, the build log dumps a similar report (which is where I noticed it)
[11:46] <bryce> yeah I'm building a checklist to go through for these packages
[11:46] <bryce> in the future I hope to scriptify some of the steps, so tools that allow for detecting issues like these are handy to know about
[11:48] <jcristau> 'debdiff old.deb new.deb' is useful too, when you want to check changes in the package contents
[11:49] <keescook> bryce: also, check for useless whitespace (empty lines in 00list, or ^ +$
[11:49] <keescook> in changelogs, etc)
[11:50] <tepsipakki> gah, I didn't have the time to push the x11* changes
[11:50] <tepsipakki> hey dudes, I'm drunk
[11:51] <bryce> heh, congrats
[11:51] <tepsipakki> bryce: whoa
[11:51] <tepsipakki> anyway, I'll push the changes tomorrow
[11:52] <bryce> okidokie
[11:52] <tepsipakki> so, hopefully we all have a syncable apps-suite by Monday :)
[11:53] <bryce> what will that include?
[11:54] <bryce> (so I can avoid duplicating efforts)
[11:55] <tepsipakki> all the numerous apps
[11:55] <tepsipakki> x*
[11:55] <tepsipakki> :)
[11:56] <bryce> ah, ok, I'm working on non-x* ones
[11:56] <tepsipakki> doing xrandr merge was ok, I understood that there was an alpha release coming soon
[11:57] <tepsipakki> they should be ok, but I'm wary about it
[11:57] <bryce> it's good practice for me in any case
[11:58] <tepsipakki> of course
[11:58] <jcristau> tepsipakki: the packages will be in NEW for a while
[11:58] <jcristau> hopefully not too long
[11:58] <tepsipakki> jcristau: yeah
[11:59] <tepsipakki> today was too busy for me to commit the changes
[11:59] <tepsipakki> there could be some patches missing, but packaging itself should be _perfect_ :)
[12:00] <tepsipakki> (patches from ubuntu
[12:00] <tepsipakki> +)
[12:01] <tepsipakki> umm
[12:02] <tepsipakki> ignore me :)
[12:06] <bryce> never!